DOCSLIB.ORG

2018 Top 200 Employers for STEM OPT Students

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2018 Top 200 Employers for OPT and STEM OPT Students Number of Students Number of Students Number of Students Participating in Top 200 Employer Names Participating in OPT or STEM OPT Participating in OPT in 2018 STEM OPT in 2018 in 2018 Amazon 2,911 851 2,395 Integra Technologies LLC 2,081 1,302 936 Intel Corporation 1,348 368 1,111 Google 1,193 308 996 Microsoft Corporation 867 243 690 AZTech Technologies LLC 854 705 188 Deloitte 747 216 579 Facebook 725 259 528 XCG Design Corporation 680 355 362 Tellon Trading, Inc 647 455 229 IBM 628 143 563 Veridic Solutions 558 332 307 Apple, Inc 538 166 433 CG Max Design Corp 521 224 326 Global IT Experts, Inc 467 442 28 Marlabs, Inc 448 166 311 Randstad 439 231 231 Ernst & Young 432 157 298 Qualcomm Technologies, Inc 416 118 351 PricewaterhouseCoopers 412 160 273 Cisco System, Inc 411 133 322 Populus Group 381 137 275 Cerner Corporation 380 94 313 Modis E&T LLC 374 120 281 Capgemini America 370 99 312 Insight Global 357 160 217 eBay or PayPal 350 116 274 JP Morgan Chase 348 68 295 Robert Half 346 260 96 University of Florida 335 224 118 Saibersys 330 144 203 Cloud Big Data 324 251 98 2018 Top 200 Employers for OPT and STEM OPT Students Walmart 320 124 224 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 315 119 220 Sinocontech 315 252 73 Cummins 312 90 241 Findream, LLC 312 112 209 Goldman Sachs 312 112 232 Stanford University 306 113 215 Oracle 305 73 256 Cognizant 301 54 258 Collabera 300 149 161 Arizona State University 298 258 59 Tesla, Inc 296 126 198 Elbum LLC 291 236 60 Apex Systems 282 115 182 Pioneer Consulting Services 282 121 205 University of Michigan 280 164 124 Columbia University 262 135 135 Amensys, Inc 261 117 165 E‐Giants Technologies LLC 259 77 217 Kforce, Inc 258 101 171 Citigroup 255 93 178 Johns Hopkins University 248 114 145 Vastek, Inc 248 139 121 University of Maryland 247 148 119 University of Pennsylvania 246 90 171 Harvard University 244 101 159 University of California, Los Angeles 241 139 127 Acuty LLC 240 203 41 Bank of America 237 64 180 University of California, Berkeley 235 127 115 Arecy LLC 234 175 61 Cloud Hybrid Technologies LLC 234 221 14 Nemo IT Solutions 224 140 97 Kelly Services 217 130 90 Adecco 215 119 108 2018 Top 200 Employers for OPT and STEM OPT Students University of Southern California 214 156 78 JNIT Technologies 213 78 157 Denken Solutions, Inc 211 113 144 Antra, Inc 209 57 169 BSASPEC, Inc 208 87 132 Genius Minds LLC 206 165 48 Pro‐Tek Consulting 205 93 136 University of Washington 204 115 103 NVIDIA Corporation 201 67 160 Bloomberg 200 59 159 Oath 200 69 173 The Ohio State University 199 126 75 North Carolina State University 192 138 61 Indiana University 190 108 88 Purdue University 190 96 101 University of Minnesota 187 93 97 Infosys Limited 185 5 182 The Mathworks, Inc 181 48 148 XtracIT 178 96 103 Dell, Inc 176 47 135 University at Buffalo 172 171 1 IMCS Group, Inc 171 104 88 Cornell University 170 112 72 Rutgers University 165 110 64 University of Pittsburgh 165 100 72 Wayfair 165 54 121 VMWare 164 57 127 PRO Unlimited 162 136 29 Uber Technologies, Inc 162 41 129 Northwestern University 161 61 107 McKinsey & Company 160 58 108 Capital One 155 41 129 Morgan Stanley 155 43 117 University of California, San Diego 154 83 78 Aerotek, Inc 152 147 5 2018 Top 200 Employers for OPT and STEM OPT Students Consultadd, Inc 148 68 86 Oklahoma State University 148 130 20 Federal Soft Systems 147 56 110 Massachusetts General Hospital 147 40 115 SAP America, Inc 147 58 113 Samsung Research America 145 37 116 Sriven Systems of TX, Inc 142 34 116 Artech Information Systems LLC 141 65 92 Expedia, Inc 141 47 107 MicroNet 141 57 91 Pennsylvania State University 141 79 69 Carnegie Mellon University 139 139 Duke University 139 74 70 FedEx Services 139 50 96 Northeastern University 139 101 45 I3 INFOTEK, INC 136 65 91 Wayne State University 136 113 25 Masswell Development Group, Inc 135 124 12 University of Illinois at Chicago 135 122 13 LinkedIn 134 37 108 Tuutkia LLC 134 134 Yale University 134 63 84 California Creative Solutions, Inc 132 30 114 Salesforce 132 44 99 Vyzer Solutions, Inc 132 39 104 Logging‐In.com 130 83 60 University of California San Francisco 130 48 98 Mythri Consulting LLC 129 61 82 Vsion Technologies, Inc 129 36 103 Reliable Software Resources, Inc 128 34 104 Synopsys, Inc 128 47 96 Michigan State University 127 71 63 Ventois 127 34 100 Friendly Consultants, Inc 126 36 101 GlobalFoundries 125 49 95 2018 Top 200 Employers for OPT and STEM OPT Students AG Technologies LLC 124 112 16 iScientia LLC 124 49 89 Vintech Solutions, Inc 124 65 81 Exa Data Solutions, Inc 122 47 81 National Institutes of Health 122 24 100 Egen Solutions, Inc 120 51 76 Florida International University 120 99 35 Georgia Institute of Technology 120 60 68 Adobe Systems Incorporated 119 56 83 California Institute of Technology 119 52 77 SilverXis, Inc 118 72 53 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc 117 23 106 Aecom 117 27 98 EASi LLC 117 22 103 New Beast LLC 116 106 12 Blackrock 115 35 85 Clemson University 114 85 34 Juniper Network 114 25 100 PVR Technologies, Inc 114 51 79 Sakthi Automotive Group 114 66 61 Anjaneyap, Inc 113 56 65 Baylor College of Medicine 112 42 78 ServiceNow, Inc 112 44 83 Binghamton University 111 111 University of Utah 111 70 48 Applied Materials 109 38 87 Flexon Technologies 109 46 81 HP, Inc 109 35 87 New York University 109 109 University of Missouri 109 78 36 Xenon Infotek, Inc. 109 38 83 HCL Global Systems, Inc 108 40 81 University of Illinois at Urbana 108 65 49 KPMG 107 39 72 Rang Technologies 107 75 35 2018 Top 200 Employers for OPT and STEM OPT Students Teknaux LLC 107 59 63 Applied Computer Techniques 106 21 88 Innovative Intelligent Solutions 105 31 81 RevereIT LLC 104 41 75 Vastika, Inc 104 52 76 Washington University in St. Louis 103 39 68 Advansoft International, Inc 102 62 43 Volt Management Corporation 102 30 83 Akamai Technologies, Inc 101 24 86 TekWissen LLC 101 51 55 Iowa State University 100 57 59 Microinfo, Inc 100 39 66 Sierra Consulting Inc 100 34 73 Tata Consultancy Services Limited 99 18 84 University of California, Davis 99 53 52 Career Soft Solutions, Inc 98 47 58 Formac Inc 98 40 70 LHP Engineering Solutions 97 53 55 University of Delaware 97 67 32 University of Houston 97 68 31 Strategic Resources International, Inc 96 28 73 Virginia Tech 96 63 37 Drexel University 95 76 23 TEKsystems 95 39 62 Econtenti, Inc 94 33 74 Comtek Global Inc DBA CentillionZ 93 37 73 Experis US, Inc 93 30 66 Micron Technology, Inc 93 34 70 .
Recommended publications
  • 2021 Microsoft Partner of the Year Award Winners and Finalists

    2021 Microsoft Partner of the Year Award Winners and Finalists

    2021 Microsoft Partner of the Year Award Winners and Finalists The Microsoft Partner of the Year Awards acknowledge outstanding achievements and innovations from across our global partner ecosystem. This impressive group of partners and their solutions demonstrates amazing agility and creativity in building new technologies across the intelligent cloud to edge, all with the goal of exceeding customer expectations by bringing technology to life in meaningful ways. This year’s group of winners and finalists is an inspiring reflection of the impact our partner ecosystem enables through the innovative technologies they continue to build for our mutual customers. Across categories including Azure, Modern Work & Security, and Social Impact, our partners are dedicated to helping customers solve challenges and truly work to support our mission to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more. Congratulations to this year’s winners and finalists, which have shown exceptional expertise, dedication to our customers, and care for our world through a year of change. Table of contents Partner of the Year Awards: Category Winners • Azure • Business Applications • Modern Work & Security • Industry • Social Impact • Business Excellence Category Finalists Country/Region Winners 2021 Microsoft Partner of the Year Award Winners – Category Azure 2021 Microsoft Partner of the Year Award Winners – Category 2021 Microsoft Partner of the Year Award Winners – Category Azure AI Icertis United States www.icertis.com Icertis’ strategic bet with Microsoft on Azure AI is delivering strong customer success and leadership positioning in the contract lifecycle management market. Hundreds of customers have been empowered through over 10 million contracts valued at more than $1 trillion, and in 40+ languages across 90+ countries.
  • Servicenow Events 16:9 Powerpoint Template

    Servicenow Events 16:9 Powerpoint Template

    Visibility to Multi-Cloud Measurable outcomes from CMDB Table of Contents Visibility into Multi-Cloud/Hybrid Cloud 3 Customer journey to Cloud Discovery 4 Visibility into TAGS 6 Deep-dive Discovery of cloud VMs 6 Event-driven Discovery 8 Discovering serverless workloads 9 New York Release enhancements 11 AWS—Identity and Access Management (IAM) roles 11 AssumeRole enhancements for AWS organizations 11 Cloud Discovery UI improvements 11 ITOM Visibility low-code framework—pattern engine and out-of-band patterns 13 For more information 14 Journey to Cloud starts with ServiceNow ITOM Multi-cloud is Cloud and DevOps are independent but mutually reinforcing strategies for quickly becoming delivering business value through IT. A hybrid or multi-cloud workload deploy- the de-facto ment offers the advantage of high resiliency, combined with the agility to adapt quickly to changing digital business requirements. Multi-cloud is quickly deployment becoming the de-facto deployment standard as organizations of all types leverage an ever-increasing variety of cloud computing services. standard as organizations Key factors that influence multi-cloud deployment strategies are: • “Best-of-breed” service offering of all types • Cost to IT Ops and enterprise licensing leverage an • Choice of technology stack for IaaS/PaaS/FaaS services ever-increasing • M&A and data sovereignty, which plays a vital role on the decision- making process variety of cloud computing Visibility into multi-cloud/hybrid cloud services. For many customers, migration to cloud is a transformational journey. Visibility to multi-cloud/hybrid cloud deployment data with on-premise infrastructure and application data is critical to solve the real-world challenges from IT Operations.
  • 967000 Phoenix Autocallable Notes Due May 27, 2022 Linked to The

    967000 Phoenix Autocallable Notes Due May 27, 2022 Linked to The

    Amendment No. 1 dated July 25, 2018 to the Pricing Supplement dated May 24, 2018 Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(2) (To the Prospectus dated March 30, 2018 and the Prospectus Supplement dated July 18, 2016) Registration No. 333–212571 $967,000 Phoenix AutoCallable Notes due May 27, 2022 Linked to the Least Performing Reference Asset of Three Equity Securities Global Medium-Term Notes, Series A Terms used in this pricing supplement, but not defined herein, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the prospectus supplement. Issuer: Barclays Bank PLC Denominations: Minimum denomination of $1,000, and integral multiples of $1,000 in excess thereof Initial Valuation Date: May 24, 2018 Issue Date: June 1, 2018 Final Valuation Date:* May 24, 2022 Maturity Date:* May 27, 2022 Reference Assets: The American depositary shares representing the ordinary shares of Alibaba Group Holding Limited (“Alibaba”), the common stock of ServiceNow, Inc. (“ServiceNow”) and the common stock of Amazon.com, Inc. (“Amazon”), as set forth in the following table: Reference Asset Bloomberg Ticker Initial Price Coupon Barrier Price Barrier Price Alibaba BABA UN <Equity> $197.37 $128.29 $118.42 ServiceNow NOW UN <Equity> $175.52 $114.09 $105.31 Amazon AMZN UW <Equity> $1,603.07 $1,042.00 $961.84 Each of the securities noted above are referred to herein as a “Reference Asset” and, collectively, as the “Reference Assets.” Automatic Call: If, on any Call Valuation Date, the Closing Price of each Reference Asset is equal to or greater than its Initial Price, the Notes will be automatically called for a cash payment per $1,000 principal amount Note equal to the Redemption Price payable on the Call Settlement Date.
  • 2018 Performance Related Share Grant

    2018 Performance Related Share Grant

    October 3, 2018 Grant of performance shares to Corporate executive officers The Board of Directors of Capgemini SE, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, has decided during its meeting on October 3, 2018, to grant a total of 1 384 530 performance shares of the company Capgemini SE to employees and corporate officers of the Company and its French and foreign subsidiaries. Out of this total, reduced versus last year due to the share price evolution, 61 000 performance shares have been granted to Mr. Paul Hermelin, Chairman and CEO, and to Messrs. Thierry Delaporte and Aiman Ezzat, Chief Operating Officers, as follows: Board of Directors decision on As a reminder 03.10.2018 2018 % of the total 2017 % of the (total number of authorized (total number of shares total shares granted) amount * granted) authorized amount Mr. P. Hermelin 28 000 35,000 2.07% Chairman and CEO Mr. T. Delaporte 16 500 3,62% n/a n/a Chief Operating Officer Mr. A. Ezzat 16 500 n/a n/a Chief Operating Officer * Ceiling of 10% of the maximum allocation authorized by the Shareholders' Meeting of May 23, 2018 (23rd resolution) for the total allocation to Corporate executive officers For each of the Corporate executive officers, the final vesting of the shares, after a three-years acquisition period, is subject to the completion of the following performance conditions: • A market performance condition (35%) based on the comparative performance of the Capgemini SE share against the average performance of a basket of eight comparable companies in the same business
  • 2014 Registration Document Annual Financial Report Contents

    2014 Registration Document Annual Financial Report Contents

    2014 REGISTRATION DOCUMENT ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CONTENTS 1 4 Presentation of the Company Financial Information 129 and its activities 5 4.1 Analysis on Capgemini 2014 Group consolidated 1.1 Milestones in the Group’s history and its values 6 results AFR 130 1.2 The Group’s activities 8 4.2 Consolidated accounts AFR 136 1.3 Main Group subsidiaries and simplified 4.3 Comments on the Cap Gemini S.A. Financial organization chart 13 Statements AFR 195 1.4 The market and the competitive environment 15 4.4 Cap Gemini S.A. financial statements AFR 197 1.5 2014, a year of strong growth 17 4.5 Other financial and accounting information AFR 221 1.6 The Group’s investment policy, financing policy and market risks AFR 25 1.7 Risk analysis AFR 26 5 CAP GEMINI and its shareholders 223 2 5.1 Cap Gemini S.A. Share Capital AFR 224 5.2 Cap Gemini S.A. and the stock market 229 Corporate governance 5.3 Current ownership structure 233 and Internal control 33 5.4 Share buyback program AFR 235 2.1 Organization and activities of the Board of Directors AFR 35 6 2.2 General organization of the Group AFR 54 2.3 Compensation of executive corporate officers AFR 58 2.4 Internal control and risk management Report of the Board of Directors procedures AFR 70 and draft resolutions 2.5 Statutory Auditors’ report prepared in accordance with Article L.225-235 of the French Commercial of the Combined Shareholders’ Code on the report prepared by the Chairman Meeting of May 6, 2015 237 of the Board of Directors AFR 79 6.1 Resolutions presented at the Ordinary Shareholders’
  • Cognizant—2019 Proxy Statement & Annual Meeting Notice

    Cognizant—2019 Proxy Statement & Annual Meeting Notice

    2019Proxy Statement & Notice of Annual Meeting Proxy Guide 1 Chairman’s Letter 4 Notice of 2019 Annual Meeting 5 Corporate Governance 5 Governance Highlights 20 Committees of the Board 6 Board Overview 22 Human Capital Management and Talent Development 8 Proposal 1 Election of Directors 23 Commitment to Corporate Sustainability 8 Director Nominees 25 Director Compensation 14 Building an Experienced, Qualified and Diverse Board 26 Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions 18 Director Selection and Voting Process 27 Stock Ownership and Reporting Corporate Governance Corporate 19 Risk Oversight 28 Compensation 35 Primary Compensation Elements 38 Compensation by Individual 28 Company Performance Snapshot 47 Other Elements of Compensation 29 Proposal 2 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation 48 Company Policies Impacting Compensation (Say-on-Pay) 49 Compensation Committee Report 29 Compensation Discussion and Analysis 50 Executive Compensation Tables and Pay Ratio 30 Compensation Program Objectives Compensation 55 Potential Payments Upon Termination or 31 Compensation Structure Overview Change in Control 33 Compensation Setting Process 58 Audit Matters 58 Proposal 3 Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 59 Auditor Fees 59 Audit Committee Report Audit Matters WHY ARE WE SENDING YOU THESE MATERIALS? On behalf of our board of directors, we are 60 Shareholder Proposals making these materials available to you 60 Proposal 4 Shareholder Proposal Regarding (beginning on April 18, 2019) in connection Political Disclosure with Cognizant’s solicitation of proxies for our 62 Proposal 5 Shareholder Proposal Regarding 2019 annual meeting of shareholders. Independent Board Chairman 64 Shareholder Proposals and Nominees for the WHAT DO WE NEED FROM YOU? 2020 Annual Meeting Please read these materials and submit Shareholder Proposals your vote and proxy using the Internet, by telephone or, if you received your materials by 65 Additional Information mail, you can also complete and return your proxy by mail.
  • Virtualwisdom App-Centric Hybrid IT Infrastructure Management Contents

    Virtualwisdom App-Centric Hybrid IT Infrastructure Management Contents

    VirtualWisdom App-centric Hybrid IT Infrastructure Management Contents Introduction 3 Operational Vulnerability 4 It’s Not Getting Easier 5 Expertise Required 6 What Expertise Is Required? 7 Traditional Monitoring Tools Don’t Cut It 9 VirtualWisdom Understands 10 Getting a Handle on Infrastructure 11 Getting a Handle on Applications 12 The Human Factor 13 VirtualWisdom Understands 14 HYBRID IT TECH BRIEF | BACK TO TOC | 2 Introduction Slow application performance and application outages cost money. As organizations have become more dependent on IT, the cost of outages has risen. Reducing the number of outages requires identifying their cause before the business is impacted. This is exactly what VirtualWisdom App-centric Hybrid IT Infrastructure Management excels at. Today, the cost of downtime for a single server can be punitive. According to Statista, 24 percent of respondents worldwide reported the average hourly downtime cost of their servers as being between $300,000 - $400,000, with more than 50 percent of respondents reporting costs in higher brackets. These statistics echo those released by Gartner, who cited $5,600 per minute as the cost of downtime: $5,600 per minute is $336,000 per hour. In today’s highly consolidated data centers, multiple individual virtualized hosts typically share a common infrastructure. A failure in any component of that infrastructure could result in multiple virtualized host failures. While it’s difficult to determine how much more a multiple-server outage would cost a given organization over a single server outage, the answer is certainly more than a single server outage would cost, and those costs are already far too high.
  • Servicenow Cloud Success AWS 15MAR Webinar

    Servicenow Cloud Success AWS 15MAR Webinar

    Achieve Cloud Success with AWS Gain Cloud Service Oversight, Minimize Risks, and Reduce Costs – Simplified Through Self-Service Manisha Arora Deaddin Edris Douglas Lee Alliance Architect Senior Product Marketing Manager Head, Solution Architecture ServiceNow ServiceNow Strategic ISV Partners, AWS © 2017 ServiceNow All Rights Reserved 1 Agenda • Introduction • Why Organizations are Moving to the Cloud • The AWS Cloud • Manage Cloud Sprawl with ServiceNow • ServiceNow and AWS – Better Together • Demo • Q & A © 2017 ServiceNow All Rights Reserved 2 ServiceNow Is A Fast-Growing, Global Company ~4,800 Employees Strong Revenue & Growth Major Sites $1.391B San Diego, Silicon Valley, Seattle Amsterdam, London, Sydney, Israel, India $1B $683M $425M $244M $128M $28M $64M ‘09 ‘10 ‘11 ‘12 ‘13 ‘14 ‘15 ’16 ©© 2017 ServiceNow All 2017 ServiceNow All Rights Rights Reserved Reserved 3 Global Enterprises in Every Industry Rely on ServiceNow Construction Federal Financial Services Healthcare Higher Education Insurance IT Services Manufacturing Media MSPs Oil and Gas Retail Services Technology ©© 2017 ServiceNow All 2017 ServiceNow All Rights Rights Reserved Reserved 4 Providing Cloud Services Across the Enterprise © 2017 ServiceNow All Rights Reserved 5 IT SLAs Force Cloud Users to Look for Alternatives Manual IT processes can take weeks to months Cloud Service Needs Grow DIY on Public Clouds Creating Shadow IT Outside of Business Controls Compliance & Introduction Audit Issues of Security Risks Inability to Control Costs © 2017 ServiceNow All Rights Reserved 7 The AWS Cloud © 2017 ServiceNow All Rights Reserved 8 The AWS Cloud Eliminate costly technical debt and reallocate resources so you can deliver high-value, revenue-generating projects faster. Innovate faster and solidify your competitive advantage by merging startup agility with enterprise experience and resources.
  • Enabling Ubiquitous Buying Via Multichannel Fulfillment

    Enabling Ubiquitous Buying Via Multichannel Fulfillment

    • Cognizant IBM Sterling Practice Overview Enabling Ubiquitous Buying via Multichannel Fulfillment Achieving True Multichannel Unique Nature of the Practice The retail landscape has changed dramatically over By remaining focused within the IBM Sterling com- the last few years, becoming increasingly complex merce space and seamlessly leveraging our vast as the “customer experience” spreads across capabilities in the areas of enterprise business retail channels. Customers today are “window- process consulting, change management, design, shopping” — researching, comparing and buying development, testing and QA among other areas, products online — and picking up or returning the our IBM Sterling commerce practice affords our product at stores. With the emergence of social customers an intimate consulting experience nor- and mobile commerce, customers want a seamless mally found in boutique consulting firms, but with shopping experience across channels. the added depth and breadth of a Tier 1 company. This cross-channel experience can be enabled We have some of the best IBM Sterling talent and only when there is a “buy anywhere, fulfill specialists — some with decades of implementa- anywhere” ability. tion experience. We team them up with business consultants who were retailers in the past and with IBM Sterling has a unique combination of powerful other IT practitioners with global project delivery capabilities: enterprise-wide inventory visibility; expertise. This combination of expertise can map a sophisticated order management mechanism retailer needs to the IBM Sterling product, suggest that can spawn multiple fulfillment channels; best practices and successfully implement in a inventory tracking across the entire supply chain; cost-optimized global delivery model. Our IBM and integration with multiple order capture Sterling practice is able to provide end-to-end systems.
  • 2020 Definitive Proxy

    2020 Definitive Proxy

    April 7, 2020 Cerner shareholders: I am pleased to invite you to attend the 2020 Annual Shareholders' Meeting of Cerner Corporation to be held on May 22, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. (CDT). The situation with COVID-19 is continuing to rapidly evolve, as is Cerner's response to help protect the health of our associates, clients and their patients, shareholders, and our communities. Based on the unfolding information, we have elected to hold our first virtual meeting of stockholders. You will be able to attend the 2020 Annual Meeting online, vote your shares, and submit questions during the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CERN2020. Three directors will stand for re-election at this year's Annual Shareholders' Meeting. We also will vote to ratify the appointment of KMPG LLP as our independent accounting firm and approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. Additionally, after carefully considering the advantages and disadvantages of the classification of our Board, the current views of our shareholders, and a growing sentiment among institutional investors and their advisory services in favor of annual elections, Cerner's Board recommends that you approve the proposed amendments to our charter that would declassify our Board of Directors and more clearly align the advance notice provisions for director nominations with those in our bylaws. Health information technology remains a dynamic industry that is an integral component in the delivery of global health care. For more than 40 years, Cerner has been at the forefront of digitizing health care - an important step toward improving the standard of living of the world's population.
  • CERNER CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)

    CERNER CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)

    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2005 OR o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number: 0-15386 CERNER CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 43-1196944 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 2800 Rockcreek Parkway North Kansas City, MO 64117 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (816) 221-1024 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) None (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $.01 par value per share Preferred Stock Voting Rights (Title of Class) Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No o Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes No o Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
  • SERVICENOW, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)

    SERVICENOW, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)

    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of report (date of earliest event reported): February 22, 2017 SERVICENOW, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 001-35580 20-2056195 (State or other jurisdiction of (Commission (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) File Number) Identification Number) 2225 Lawson Lane Santa Clara, California 95054 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (408) 501-8550 Not Applicable (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2 below): ☐ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) ☐ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) ☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) ☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) Item 5.02: Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. (b) On February 24, 2017, Frank Slootman notified ServiceNow, Inc. (the “Company”) of his decision to resign from his position as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, effective April 3, 2017.