Janaury 11, 2002
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2016 Lilly Report of Political Financial Support
16 2016 Lilly Report of Political Financial Support 1 16 2016 Lilly Report of Political Financial Support Lilly employees are dedicated to innovation and the discovery of medicines to help people live longer, healthier and more active lives, and more importantly, doing their work with integrity. LillyPAC was established to work to ensure that this vision is also shared by lawmakers, who make policy decisions that impact our company and the patients we serve. In a new political environment where policies can change with a “tweet,” we must be even more vigilant about supporting those who believe in our story, and our PAC is an effective way to support those who share our views. We also want to ensure that you know the story of LillyPAC. Transparency is an important element of our integrity promise, and so we are pleased to share this 2016 LillyPAC annual report with you. LillyPAC raised $949,267 through the generous, voluntary contributions of 3,682 Lilly employees in 2016. Those contributions allowed LillyPAC to invest in 187 federal candidates and more than 500 state candidates who understand the importance of what we do. You will find a full financial accounting in the following pages, as well as complete lists of candidates and political committees that received LillyPAC support and the permissible corporate contributions made by the company. In addition, this report is a helpful guide to understanding how our PAC operates and makes its contribution decisions. On behalf of the LillyPAC Governing Board, I want to thank everyone who has made the decision to support this vital program. -
Senators & Committees
Select Committees Hearing Rooms Committee on Committees Note: The ongoing replacement of Capitol heating, ventilation and Chair: Sen. Robert Hilkemann; V. Chair: Sen. Adam Morfeld air conditioning equipment requires temporary relocation of certain Senators & 1st District: Sens. Bostelman, Kolterman, Moser legislative offices and hearing rooms. Please contact the Clerk of the 2nd District: Sens. Hunt, Lathrop, Lindstrom, Vargas Legislature’sN Office (402-471-2271) if you have difficulty locating a 3rd District: Sens. Albrecht, Erdman, Groene, Murman particular office or hearing1st room. Floor Enrollment and Review First Floor Committees Chair: Sen. Terrell McKinney Account- ing 1008 1004 1000 1010 Reference 1010-1000 1326-1315 Chair: Sen. Dan Hughes; V. Chair: Sen. Tony Vargas M Fiscal Analyst H M 1012 W 1007 1003 W Members: Sens. Geist, Hilgers, Lathrop, Lowe, McCollister, 1015 Pansing Brooks, Slama, Stinner (nonvoting ex officio) 1402 1401 1016 Rules 1017 1308 1404 1403 1401-1406 1019 1301-1314 1023-1012 Chair: Sen. Robert Clements; V. Chair: Sen. Wendy DeBoer 1305 1018 Security Research 1306 Members: Sens. J. Cavanaugh, Erdman, M. Hansen, Hilgers (ex officio) 1405 1021 1406 Pictures of Governors 1022 Research H H Gift 1302 1023 15281524 1522 E E 1510 Shop Pictures of Legislators Info. 1529-1522 Desk 1512-1502 H E E H Special Committees* 1529 1525 1523 1507 1101 Redistricting 1104 Members: Sens. Blood, Briese, Brewer, Geist, Lathrop, Linehan, Lowe, W Bill Room Morfeld, Wayne 1103 Cafeteria Mail-Copy 1114-1101 1207-1224 Building Maintenance Center 1417-1424 1110 Self- 1107 Service Chair: Sen. Steve Erdman Copies Members: Sens. Brandt, Dorn, Lowe, McDonnell, Stinner W H W M 1113 1115 1117 1423 M 1114 Education Commission of the States 1113-1126 1200-1210 1212 N Members: Sens. -
FY 2019 Political Contributions.Xlsx
WalgreenCoPAC Political Contributions: FY 2019 Recipient Amount Arkansas WOMACK FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE 1,000.00 Arizona BRADLEY FOR ARIZONA 2018 200.00 COMMITTE TO ELECT ROBERT MEZA FOR STATE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 200.00 ELECT MICHELLE UDALL 200.00 FRIENDS OF WARREN PETERSEN 200.00 GALLEGO FOR ARIZONA 1,000.00 JAY LAWRENCE FOR THE HOUSE 18 200.00 KATE BROPHY MCGEE FOR AZ 200.00 NANCY BARTO FOR HOUSE 2018 200.00 REGINA E. COBB 2018 200.00 SHOPE FOR HOUSE 200.00 VINCE LEACH FOR SENATE 200.00 VOTE HEATHER CARTER SENATE 200.00 VOTE MESNARD 200.00 WENINGER FOR AZ HOUSE 200.00 California AMI BERA FOR CONGRESS 4,000.00 KAREN BASS FOR CONGRESS 3,500.00 KEVIN MCCARTHY FOR CONGRESS 5,000.00 SCOTT PETERS FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 TONY CARDENAS FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 WALTERS FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 Colorado CHRIS KENNEDY BACKPAC 400.00 COFFMAN FOR CONGRESS 2018 1,000.00 CORY GARDNER FOR SENATE 5,000.00 DANEYA ESGAR LEADERSHIP FUND 400.00 STEVE FENBERG LEADERSHIP FUND 400.00 Connecticut LARSON FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 Delaware CARPER FOR SENATE 1,000.00 Florida BILIRAKIS FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 DARREN SOTO FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 DONNA SHALALA FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 STEPHANIE MURPHY FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 VERN BUCHANAN FOR CONGRESS 2,500.00 Georgia BUDDY CARTER FOR CONGRESS 4,000.00 Illinois 1 WalgreenCoPAC Political Contributions: FY 2019 Recipient Amount CHUY GARCIA FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 CITIZENS FOR RUSH 1,000.00 DAN LIPINSKI FOR CONGRESS 1,000.00 DAVIS FOR CONGRESS/FRIENDS OF DAVIS 1,500.00 FRIENDS OF CHERI BUSTOS 1,000.00 FRIENDS OF DICK DURBIN COMMITTEE -
Introduction
1 INTRODUCTION At the 2017 Annual Meeting, the League of Women Voters of Nebraska voted to approve a Money in Politics study in Nebraska. Much has been written and researched nationally about the overall increase in campaign donations and “dark money” funneled through shadowy non-profit organizations; the LWVNE study focused on what, if any, of the nationally identified trends were also true in Nebraska. The League study was scoped down to the 2016 Nebraska State Legislature races to analyze: 1. To what extent can a winner be predicted based on the amount of money raised? 2. What did the source of donations play? 3. Was “dark money” a part of Nebraska’s political landscape? 4. How do Nebraska campaign finance laws compare to surrounding states? 5. What is the overall effect of Nebraska’s campaign finance laws on the Nebraska Unicameral? 6. Has the Governor gone too far in recruiting and financing Unicameral candidates? 7. How could Nebraska’s campaign finance laws be updated and improved? The League of Women Voters of Nebraska, a non-partisan non-profit organization, does not endorse, support or oppose candidates for office. The League of Women Voters takes positions on and advocates for issues particularly in the area of voting rights and protecting and promoting democracy. The League of Women Voters-US has a long-standing position on Money in Politics which can be summed up as: Elections should be about the voters not big money interests. This study will be used to develop the Nebraska League’s position statement. When this report is read on-line, links to the full data are enabled for readers who wish to see a full 50 state comparison or additional commentary. -
2017-Year-End-Political-Report.Pdf
1 Verizon Political Activity January – December 2017 A Message from Craig Silliman Verizon is affected by a wide variety of government policies -- from telecommunications regulation to taxation to health care and more -- that have an enormous impact on the business climate in which we operate. We owe it to our shareowners, employees and customers to advocate public policies that will enable us to compete fairly and freely in the marketplace. Political contributions are one way we support the democratic electoral process and participate in the policy dialogue. Our employees have established political action committees at the federal level and in 18 states. These political action committees (PACs) allow employees to pool their resources to support candidates for office who generally support the public policies our employees advocate. This report lists all PAC contributions, corporate political contributions, support for ballot initiatives and independent expenditures made by Verizon and its affiliates during 2017. The contribution process is overseen by the Corporate Governance and Policy Committee of our Board of Directors, which receives a comprehensive report and briefing on these activities at least annually. We intend to update this voluntary disclosure twice a year and publish it on our corporate website. We believe this transparency with respect to our political spending is in keeping with our commitment to good corporate governance and a further sign of our responsiveness to the interests of our shareowners. Craig L. Silliman Executive Vice President, Public Policy and General Counsel 2 Verizon Political Activity January – December 2017 Political Contributions Policy: Our Voice in the Democratic Process What are the Verizon Political Action Committees? including the setting of monetary contribution limitations and The Verizon Political Action Committees (PACs) exist to help the establishment of periodic reporting requirements. -
2020 Contributions
State Candidate Names Committee Amount Party Office District CA Holmes, Jim Jim Holmes for Supervisor 2020 $ 700 O County Supervisor 3 CA Uhler, Kirk Uhler for Supervisor 2020 $ 500 O County Supervisor 4 CA Gonzalez, Lena Lena Gonzalez for Senate 2020 $ 1,500 D STATE SENATE 33 CA Lee, John John Lee for City Council 2020 - Primary $ 800 O City Council 12 CA Simmons, Les Simmons for City Council 2020 $ 1,000 D City Council 8 CA Porada, Debra Porada for City Council 2020 $ 500 O City Council AL CA California Manufacturers & Technology Association Political Action Committee $ 5,000 CA Desmond, Richard Rich Desmond for Supervisor 2020 $ 1,200 R County Supervisor 3 CA Hewitt, Jeffrey Jeffrey Hewitt for Board of Supervisors Riverside County 2018 $ 1,200 O County Supervisor 5 CA Gustafson, Cindy Elect Cindy Gustafson Placer County Supervisor, District 5 - 2020 $ 700 O County Supervisor 5 CA Cook, Paul Paul Cook for Supervisor 2020 $ 1,000 R County Supervisor 1 CA Flores, Dan Dan Flores for Supervisor 2020 $ 500 County Supervisor 5 CA California Taxpayers Association - Protect Taxpayers Rights $ 800,000 CA Latinas Lead California $ 500 CA Wapner, Alan Wapner for Council $ 1,000 City Council CA Portantino, Anthony Portantino for Senate 2020 $ 2,000 D STATE SENATE 25 CA Burke, Autumn Autumn Burke for Assembly 2020 $ 2,000 D STATE HOUSE 62 CA California Republican Party - State Account $ 15,000 R CA Fong, Vince Vince Fong for Assembly 2020 $ 1,500 D STATE HOUSE 34 CA O'Donnell, Patrick O'Donnell for Assembly 2020 $ 4,700 D STATE HOUSE 70 CA Sacramento Metropolitan Chamber Political Action Committee $ 2,500 CA Patterson, Jim Patterson for Assembly 2020 $ 1,500 R STATE HOUSE 23 CA Arambula, Joaquin Dr. -
Pfizer Inc. Regarding Congruency of Political Contributions on Behalf of Tara Health Foundation
SANFORD J. LEWIS, ATTORNEY January 28, 2021 Via electronic mail Office of Chief Counsel Division of Corporation Finance U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549 Re: Shareholder Proposal to Pfizer Inc. Regarding congruency of political contributions on Behalf of Tara Health Foundation Ladies and Gentlemen: Tara Health Foundation (the “Proponent”) is beneficial owner of common stock of Pfizer Inc. (the “Company”) and has submitted a shareholder proposal (the “Proposal”) to the Company. I have been asked by the Proponent to respond to the supplemental letter dated January 25, 2021 ("Supplemental Letter") sent to the Securities and Exchange Commission by Margaret M. Madden. A copy of this response letter is being emailed concurrently to Margaret M. Madden. The Company continues to assert that the proposal is substantially implemented. In essence, the Company’s original and supplemental letters imply that under the substantial implementation doctrine as the company understands it, shareholders are not entitled to make the request of this proposal for an annual examination of congruency, but that a simple written acknowledgment that Pfizer contributions will sometimes conflict with company values is all on this topic that investors are entitled to request through a shareholder proposal. The Supplemental letter makes much of the claim that the proposal does not seek reporting on “instances of incongruency” but rather on how Pfizer’s political and electioneering expenditures aligned during the preceding year against publicly stated company values and policies.” While the company has provided a blanket disclaimer of why its contributions may sometimes be incongruent, the proposal calls for an annual assessment of congruency. -
2016-Year-End-Political-Report.Pdf
1 Verizon Political Activity January – December 2016 A Message from Craig Silliman Verizon is affected by a wide variety of government policies -- from telecommunications regulation to taxation to health care and more -- that have an enormous impact on the business climate in which we operate. We owe it to our shareowners, employees and customers to advocate public policies that will enable us to compete fairly and freely in the marketplace. Political contributions are one way we support the democratic electoral process and participate in the policy dialogue. Our employees have established political action committees at the federal level and in 18 states. These political action committees (PACs) allow employees to pool their resources to support candidates for office who generally support the public policies our employees advocate. This report lists all PAC contributions, corporate political contributions, support for ballot initiatives and independent expenditures made by Verizon and its affiliates during 2016. The contribution process is overseen by the Corporate Governance and Policy Committee of our Board of Directors, which receives a comprehensive report and briefing on these activities at least annually. We intend to update this voluntary disclosure twice a year and publish it on our corporate website. We believe this transparency with respect to our political spending is in keeping with our commitment to good corporate governance and a further sign of our responsiveness to the interests of our shareowners. Craig L. Silliman Executive Vice President, Public Policy and General Counsel 2 Verizon Political Activity January – December 2016 Political Contributions Policy: Our Voice in the Democratic Process What are the Verizon Good Government Clubs? setting of monetary contribution limitations and the The Verizon Good Government Clubs (GGCs) exist to help the establishment of periodic reporting requirements. -
Lobbyist Spending: Nebraska’S Other Pandemic Thrives During COVID-19 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Lobbyist Spending: Nebraska’s Other Pandemic Thrives During COVID-19 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2000, gross earnings for the Nebraska lobby were recorded as $3,002853. Since then, we have seen increases each year reaching an all-time high in 2019 of $19,405,061. The 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, however, brought the steady growth in total earnings to a halt. Gross earnings in 2020 dropped nearly a million dollars from $19,405,061 to $18,589,372, but the loss in revenue to the individual lobbying firms was not as dramatic as one might think. In fact, lobbyist com- pensation increased for more than half of our top-10 firms. It appears that the limits on entertainment and tickets to events reduced lobby expenses, making more funds available for lobbyist compensation. Issues at the capitol caused major educational entities to invest more heavily in lobbying. Eight of 15 school districts that employ their own lobbyists increased their spending. Most school districts without their own lobbyists had to hope their interests were protected. Although the University of Nebraska slightly increased its overall spending, it reduced spending on enter- tainment, gifts, and tickets by more than $33,000. The virus dramatically cut into athletic ticket distribution. The accountability and disclosure records indicate lobbyist entertainment expenses for our legislators as $74,576, but none of that money showed up on our senator’s gift report. Since food and beverages are exempt from reporting, we have to conclude that everyone is dining well at the capitol despite COVID-19. Common Cause Nebraska continues to be concerned about the influence of campaign contributions from lobbyists, political action committees (PACs), and principals (entities that hire lobbyists). -
Political Contributions 2018
REPORT 2018U.S. Political Contributions & Related Activity LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN The 300,000 employees of UnitedHealth Group are dedicated to making a difference in the lives of the 141 million people we are privileged to serve, one person and one health system at a time. Health care remains an extremely important and deeply personal priority for Federal and State policy-makers, and the constituents and communities they represent. UnitedHealth Group values the opportunity to participate meaningfully in the ongoing national conversation about health care and to share proven solutions and best practices that aim to address the total cost of care, advance health care quality and outcomes, and improve the health care experience for everyone. The UnitedHealth Group PAC is one element of our comprehensive efforts to engage elected officials and communicate the breadth and scope of our Enterprise’s capabilities and expertise to help solve complex health care challenges. The UnitedHealth Group PAC is a nonpartisan political action committee funded entirely by voluntary contributions from eligible employees to support Federal and State candidates, political parties, and other political action committees who champion policies that increase affordability and access to quality health care. All PAC contributions and corporate contributions are made in accordance with applicable election laws and overseen by the UnitedHealth Group Board of Directors’ Public Policy Strategies and Responsibility Committee. UnitedHealth Group is committed to advancing actionable policy solutions with Federal and State policy-makers on how best to create a modern, high-performing, simpler health care system, and delivering on our mission of helping people live healthier lives and helping make the health system work better for everyone. -
Board of Regents Meeting
Board of Regents Meeting Nebraska Innovation Campus Conference Center NOTICE OF MEETING Notice is hereby given that the Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska will meet in a publicly convened session on Friday, April 9, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. at the Nebraska Innovation Campus Conference Center, 2021 Transformation Drive, Lincoln, Nebraska. An agenda of subjects to be considered at said meeting, kept on a continually current basis, is available for inspection in the office of the Corporation Secretary of the Board of Regents, Varner Hall, 3835 Holdrege Street, Lincoln, Nebraska, or at https://nebraska.edu/regents/agendas‐minutes A copy of this notice will be delivered to the Lincoln Journal Star, the Omaha World‐Herald, the Daily Nebraskan, the Gateway, the Antelope, the Kearney Hub, the Lincoln office of the Associated Press, members of the Board of Regents, and the President’s Council of the University of Nebraska. Dated: April 2, 2021 Stacia L. Palser Interim Corporation Secretary Board of Regents University of Nebraska Board of Regents Varner Hall | 3835 Holdrege Street | Lincoln, NE 68583-0745 | 402.472.3906 | FAX: 402.472.1237 | nebraska.edu/regents AGENDA THE BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA Nebraska Innovation Campus Conference Center, 2021 Transformation Drive, Lincoln, Nebraska 68508 Friday, April 9, 2021 9:00 a.m. Health and safety protocols will be in place. Masks or face coverings are required. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES AND RATIFICATION OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON FEBRUARY 12, 2021 IV. PRESENTATIONS Legislative Update: Senator Mike Hilgers, Speaker of the Legislature 2020 Presidential Medal of Service V. -
2020 Political Contributions and Related Activity Report
2020 Political Contributions & Related Activity Report 2020 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Scott Anglin Elena McFann, SVP, Treasurer & President, Medicaid West Chief Investment Officer Region Laurie Benintendi Kristen Metzger VP & Counsel, CSBD/Clinical President, Medicaid Central Region Robert Galle VP, Stars Prakash Patel EVP & President, Diversified Business Group Nancy Gilbride VP, Chief Sales Officer, IngenioRx Maria Proulx RVP, Sales Julie Goon SVP, Public Affairs Kevin Riordan Anthem PAC Chair RVP, Federal Affairs Anthem PAC Treasurer Morgan Kendrick President, West Markets Rajeev Ronanki Commercial SVP & Chief Digital Officer Scott Kreiling Patricia Sauro SVP, Sales Enblmt - Fast VP, Culture, Transformation, Forward Track Leader & Organizational Performance Mona Lisa Lysinger VP, Human Resources CSBD Bryony Winn Chief Strategy Officer Gloria McCarthy EVP & Chief Adminsitrative Tracy Winn Officer PAC Manager Anthem PAC Asst Treasurer Paul Marchetti SVP, Healthcare Mgmt 1 2020 CHAIRMAN’S LETTER As the calendar turned to start a new decade, none of us imagined what we would face in 2020. Through it all, Anthem remained focused on its core business issues. We were able to do so because of our associates, who made the pivot to working under pandemic conditions, while continuing to deliver on our promises to those we serve. Those promises are easier to manage because our associates also stepped up in 2020 to ensure that Anthem PAC was able to leverage our collective voices to help shape and inform the legislative landscape around COVID-19 delivery of care and many other core business issues in support of our company, our industry, and our customers. The generous donations of our associates allowed Anthem PAC to help elect federal and state lawmakers across the political spectrum who believe in the value of a competitive marketplace that allows us to offer consumers innovative, affordable healthcare choices.