DOCSLIB.ORG

Eel Weir FERC Environmental Assessment Supplement 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Document Accession #: 20140408-3044 Filed Date: 04/08/2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION S.D. Warren Company Project No. 2984-042 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (April 8, 2014) In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (Commission) regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for new license for the Eel Weir Project, located at the outlet of Sebago Lake on the Presumpscot River, in Cumberland County, Maine, and has prepared a supplemental Environmental Assessment (supplemental EA) for the project. The supplemental EA contains the staff’s analysis of the potential environmental impacts of the project and concludes that licensing the project, with appropriate environmental protective measures, would not constitute a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment. A copy of the supplemental EA is available for review at the Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission’s website at http://www.ferc.gov using the “eLibrary” link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at [email protected], at (866) 208-3676 (toll free), or (202) 502-8659 (TTY). You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via e-mail of new filings and issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support. Any comments should be filed within 30 days from the date of this notice. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file comments using the Commission’s eFiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs- filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support. In lieu of electronic filing, please send a paper copy to: Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Document Accession #: 20140408-3044 Filed Date: 04/08/2014 Project No. 2984-042 2 Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426. The first page of any filing should include docket number P-2984-042. For further information, contact Tom Dean at (202) 502- 6041. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary. Document Accession #: 20140408-3044 Filed Date: 04/08/2014 SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR HYDROPOWER LICENSE Eel Weir Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. 2984-042 Maine Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Energy Projects Division of Hydropower Licensing 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426 April 2014 Document Accession #: 20140408-3044 Filed Date: 04/08/2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................ ix I. APPLICATION...........................................................................................- 1 - II. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION ......................................................- 2 - A. Purpose of Action........................................................................................- 2 - B. Need for Power............................................................................................- 3 - III. PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES .........................................- 4 - A. Description of Existing Project Facilities.....................................................- 4 - B. Description of Existing Project Operation....................................................- 4 - C. Proposed Action ..........................................................................................- 9 - D. Proposed Action with Additional Environmental Measures.......................- 11 - 1. Agency- and Interested Party-Recommended Changes to the LLMP ........................................................................................- 11 - 2. Staff Alternative.........................................................................- 18 - 3. 2014 Staff Alternative with Mandatory Conditions ....................- 20 - E. No-Action .................................................................................................- 21 - F. Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Study ....................- 21 - IV. AGENCY CONSULTATION AND COMPLIANCE.........................................- 22 - A. Agency Consultation .................................................................................- 22 - 1. Scoping......................................................................................- 22 - 2. Interventions..............................................................................- 23 - 3. Comments on the Application ....................................................- 24 - 4. Comments on the Draft Environmental Assessment ...................- 25 - B. Compliance with Mandatory Requirements ...............................................- 26 - 1. Water Quality Certification .......................................................- 26 - 2. Section 18 Fishway Prescription ...............................................- 26 - 3. Coastal Zone Management Act..................................................- 27 - 4. Endangered Species Act ............................................................- 27 - 5. Section 106 Consultation...........................................................- 28 - V. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS............- 29 - A. General Description of the Locale .............................................................- 29 - B. Cumulative Effects Analysis......................................................................- 31 - 1. Geographic Scope .....................................................................- 32 - 2. Temporal Scope.........................................................................- 32 - C. Environmental Analysis.............................................................................- 33 - 1. Geological and Soil Resources ..................................................- 33 - 2. Water Resources........................................................................- 60 - 3. Fisheries and Aquatic Resources.............................................- 119 - 4. Terrestrial Resources ..............................................................- 190 - 5. Recreational Resources and Land Use ....................................- 204 - 6. Archeological and Historic Resources.....................................- 239 - 7. Socioeconomic Resources........................................................- 244 - i Document Accession #: 20140408-3044 Filed Date: 04/08/2014 D. No-Action Alternative .............................................................................- 250 - VI. DEVELOPMENTAL ANALYSIS ...................................................................- 252 - A. Power and Economic Benefits of the Project ...........................................- 252 - B. Power and Economic Benefits of the No-Action Alternative ...................- 253 - C. Cost of Environmental Measures .............................................................- 253 - D. Power and Economic Benefits of the Applicant’s Proposed Project.........- 266 - E. Power and Economic Benefits of the Proposed Action with Additional Staff- Recommended Measures .........................................................................- 266 - F. Power and Economic Benefits of the Proposed Action with Additional Staff- Recommended Measures and Mandatory Conditions...............................- 267 - G. Economic Comparison of the Alternatives (Supplemental EA).................- 267 - VII. COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT AND RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE ................................................................................................................................- 268 - A. Measures Proposed by S.D. Warren ........................................................- 269 - B. Additional Measures Recommended by Staff ...........................................- 270 - C. Additional Recommended Measures ........................................................- 272 - D. Measures Not Recommended...................................................................- 281 - VIII. CONSISTENCY WITH FISH AND WILDLIFE RECOMMENDATIONS...- 282 - A. Recommendations Pursuant to Section 10(j) of the FPA..........................- 286 - B. Recommendations under Section 10(a) of the FPA..................................- 292 - IX. CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLANS.....................................- 294 - X. FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT .....................................................- 295 - XI. LITERATURE CITED.....................................................................................- 296 - XII. LIST OF PREPARERS ...................................................................................- 307 - Appendix A – Figures Appendix B – Maine’s LLMP Proposal Appendix C – LLMP Wetlands Monitoring Survey Results Appendix D – Maine Department of Environmental Protection Water Quality Certification Conditions ii Document Accession #: 20140408-3044 Filed Date: 04/08/2014 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page Figure 1. Maine’s recommended changes to the LLMP for Sebago Lake
Recommended publications
  • Surficial Geology of the Naples 7.5' Quadrangle, Maine

    Surficial Geology of the Naples 7.5' Quadrangle, Maine

    DE PART MENT OF CON SER VA TION Maine Geo logi cal Sur vey Rob ert G. Marv in ney, State Ge olo gist OPEN- FILE NO. 97-65 Ti tle: Sur fic ial Ge ol ogy of the Naples 7.5- minute Quad ran gle, Cum ber land County, Maine Author: Carol T. Hildreth Date: 1997 Fi nan cial Sup port: Funding for the prepara tion of this report was provided in part by the U.S. Geo logi cal Sur vey STATE MAP Pro gram, Co op era tive Agree ment No. 1434- 95- A- 01364. As so ci ated Maps: Sur fic ial ge ol ogy of the Naples quad ran gle, Open- File 97- 50 Surfic ial materials of the Naples quadran gle, Open- File 98-188 Con tents: 9 p. report Maine Geo logi cal Sur vey Open- File 97- 65 Surficial Geology of the Naples 7.5-minute Quadrangle, Cumberland County, Maine Carol T. Hil dreth CTH En ter prizes 135 Wash ing ton Street Hol lis ton, Mas sa chu setts 01746 IN TRO DUC TION The Naples 7.5' quadran gle has an area of about 133 km2 others (1985, p. 52) point out that de posit s of gla cial streams in (52 mi2). It is lo cated in south west ern Maine, within the Sea - Maine form a den dritic pat tern that may reflect pre gla cial drain - board Lowland physiographi c province , about 32 km (20 mi) age (Figure 2). Thus the pregla cia l Androscog gin River may northwest of Portland.
  • The Following Document Comes to You From

    The Following Document Comes to You From

    MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE The following document is provided by the LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib Reproduced from scanned originals with text recognition applied (searchable text may contain some errors and/or omissions) ACTS AND RESOLVES AS PASSED BY THE Ninetieth and Ninety-first Legislatures OF THE STATE OF MAINE From April 26, 1941 to April 9, 1943 AND MISCELLANEOUS STATE PAPERS Published by the Revisor of Statutes in accordance with the Resolves of the Legislature approved June 28, 1820, March 18, 1840, March 16, 1842, and Acts approved August 6, 1930 and April 2, 193I. KENNEBEC JOURNAL AUGUSTA, MAINE 1943 PUBLIC LAWS OF THE STATE OF MAINE As Passed by the Ninety-first Legislature 1943 290 TO SIMPLIFY THE INLAND FISHING LAWS CHAP. 256 -Hte ~ ~ -Hte eOt:l:llty ffi' ft*; 4tet s.e]3t:l:ty tfl.a.t mry' ~ !;;llOWR ~ ~ ~ ~ "" hunting: ffi' ftshiRg: Hit;, ffi' "" Hit; ~ mry' ~ ~ ~, ~ ft*; eounty ~ ft8.t rett:l:rRes. ~ "" rC8:S0R8:B~e tffi:re ~ ft*; s.e]38:FtaFe, ~ ~ ffi" 5i:i'ffi 4tet s.e]3uty, ~ 5i:i'ffi ~ a-5 ~ 4eeme ReCCSS8:F)-, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ffi'i'El, 4aH ~ eRtitles. 4E; Fe8:50nable fee5 ffi'i'El, C!E]3C::lSCS ~ ft*; sen-ices ffi'i'El, ~ ft*; ffi4s, ~ ~ ~ ~ -Hte tFeasurcr ~ ~ eouRty. BefoFc tfte sffi4 ~ €of' ~ ~ 4ep­ i:tt;- ~ ffle.t:J:.p 8:s.aitional e1E]3cfisc itt -Hte eM, ~ -Hte ~ ~~' ~, ftc ~ ~ -Hte conseRt ~"" lIiajority ~ -Hte COt:l:fity COfi111'lissioReFs ~ -Hte 5a+4 coufity. Whenever it shall come to the attention of the commis­ sioner
  • Presumpscot Watershed Initiative Factsheet.Pub

    Presumpscot Watershed Initiative Factsheet.Pub

    Presumpscot Watershed Initiative PROJECT FACTSHEET Historical Background The success of the Presumpscot The Presumpscot River flows 27 miles from Sebago Lake into Casco Bay and the Watershed Initiative was the result of Gulf of Maine. The river’s watershed encompasses 205 square miles of primarily many partners working together throughout the watershed to improve forested and agricultural land. The river itself has a history of extensive industrial habitat and water quality and to foster use since the early 1700s. By the 1950s, the river had nine ddams an was so stewardship. In addition to the Casco polluted that fumes from the river peeled paint off nearby homes. Prior to Bay Estuary Partnership, partners industrialization, there were abundant salmon, alewife, shad, smelt, and eel included: fisheries, which have since been greatly diminished. Cumberland County Soil and Water Conservation District In recent years the water and habitat quality of the river have improved with the Friends of Casco Bay cessation of pulp mill discharges in the 1990s and the removal of Smelt Hill Dam Presumpscot River Watch in 2002. Anadromous fish are returning to the river’s main stem and tributaries. Presumpscot River Watershed Coalition Environmental Challenges Maine Department of While the river has recovered from some past problems, increased watershed Environmental Protection and shoreline development are leading to environmental impacts: Municipal road crews, state agencies, Toxic chemicals and excess nutrients enter the river system via stormwater golf courses, citizen volunteers, landowners, schools, and many flowing from impervious surfaces. others! Excess sedimentation from roadways and livestock activities deteriorate fish spawning areas. The loss of riparian vegetation causes thermal impacts, which impair water quality for cold water fisheries.
  • Geologic Site of the Month: Why Is Sebago Lake So Deep?

    Geologic Site of the Month: Why Is Sebago Lake So Deep?

    Why is Sebago Lake so deep? Maine Geological Survey Maine Geologic Facts and Localities February, 1999 Why is Sebago Lake so deep? 43° 51‘ 13.36“ N, 70° 33‘ 43.98“ W Text by Robert A. Johnston Maine Geological Survey, Department of Agriculture, Conservation & Forestry 1 Why is Sebago Lake so deep? Maine Geological Survey Introduction Modern geophysical equipment allows geologists to investigate previously unmapped environments, including ocean and lake floors. Recent geophysical research studied the types, composition, areal extent, and thickness of sediments on the bottom of Sebago Lake in southwestern Maine. Geologists used side- scan sonar and seismic reflection profiling to map the bottom of the lake. Approximately 58 percent of the lake bottom was imaged with side-scan sonar and over 60 miles of seismic reflection profiles were collected. This web site will discuss the findings of the seismic reflection profiling. Maine Geological Survey, Department of Agriculture, Conservation & Forestry 2 Why is Sebago Lake so deep? Maine Geological Survey Physiographic setting Sebago Lake, although second in surface area to Moosehead Lake, is Maine's deepest lake. With a water depth of 316 feet, its deepest part is 49 feet below sea level! Sebago Lake is located in southwestern Maine 20 miles northwest of Portland and 50 miles southeast of the White Mountains. It lies along the transition between the Central Highlands and the Coastal Lowlands physiographic regions of New England (Figure 1). The abrupt change in landscape can be seen in panoramic views from several vantage points near Sebago Lake. Denny, 1982 Denny, Maine Geological Survey From From Figure 1.
  • Maine Boating 2008 Laws & Rules

    Maine Boating 2008 Laws & Rules

    Maine State Library Maine State Documents Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Law Books Inland Fisheries and Wildlife 1-1-2008 Maine Boating 2008 Laws & Rules Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalmaine.com/ifw_law_books Recommended Citation "Maine Boating 2008 Laws & Rules" (2008). Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Law Books. 479. http://digitalmaine.com/ifw_law_books/479 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Inland Fisheries and Wildlife at Maine State Documents. It has been accepted for inclusion in Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Law Books by an authorized administrator of Maine State Documents. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STATE OF MAINE BOATING 2008 LAW S & RU L E S www.maine.gov/ifw STATE OF MAINE BOATING 2008 LAW S & RU L E S www.maine.gov/ifw MESSAGE FROM THE GOVERNOR & COMMISSIONER With an impressive inventory of 6,000 lakes and ponds, 3,000 miles of coastline, and over 32,000 miles of rivers and streams, Maine is truly a remarkable place for you to launch your boat and enjoy the variety and beauty of our waters. Providing public access to these bodies of water is extremely impor- tant to us because we want both residents and visitors alike to enjoy them to the fullest. The Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife works diligently to provide access to Maine’s waters, whether it’s a remote mountain pond, or Maine’s Casco Bay. How you conduct yourself on Maine’s waters will go a long way in de- termining whether new access points can be obtained since only a fraction of our waters have dedicated public access.
  • Total Phosphorus Loads for Selected Tributaries to Sebago Lake, Maine

    Total Phosphorus Loads for Selected Tributaries to Sebago Lake, Maine

    science for a changing world Total Phosphorus Loads for Selected Tributaries to Sebago Lake, Maine Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4003 V Prepared in cooperation with the Portland Water District U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey By Glenn A. Hodgkins Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4003 Prepared in cooperation with the Portland Water District Augusta, Maine 2001 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 26 Ganneston Dr. Box 25286, Federal Center Augusta, ME 04330 Denver, CO 80225 http://me.water.usgs.gov CONTENTS Abstract.................................................................................... 1 Introduction................................................................................. 2 Description of the study area.................................................................... 2 Data collection and analysis .................................................................... 2 Data-collection networks in the Sebago Lake Basin.......................................... 2 Adequacy of current stream-gaging network ..............................................
  • Seventieth Legislature

    Seventieth Legislature

    MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE The following document is provided by the LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib Reproduced from scanned originals with text recognition applied (searchable text may contain some errors and/or omissions) NEW DRAFT. Seventieth Legislature. HOUSE. No. 87 STATE OF MAINE. IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND ONE. RESOLVE to complete the improvements of Songo and Chute River;-;. Resolved, That the sum of five hundred dollars ( 500) is 2 hereby appropriated for the purpose of completing the 3 dredging, construction of jettie::; or break-waters, and 4 other improvements, to render navigable, throughout the 5 entire season, those parts of the interior waterway, in the 6 Sebago Lake Steamboat route, known as Chute's river, 7 situated between Long lake and the bay of Naples, in the 8 town of Naples, county of Cumberland, and at Songo 9 lock and mouth of Songo river, which connects the bay of JO Naples and Sebago lake, in said town and county. 2 HOUSE-No. 87. The expenditure of such appropriation, shall be under 12 the direction of the county commissioners of Cumberland 13 county, who shall employ a competent man to supervise 14 such improvements, in accordance with the plan laid out 15 by the civil engineer employed by said commiseioners, in 16 the fall of 1899. Provided, however, that no part of this appropriation 18 shall be paid by the state, until a total sum of sixteen 19 hundred dollars ($1,600) shall have been expended on the 20 improvements of said Songo and Chute rivers, since such 21 improvements were begun in 1899.
  • Surface Water Supply of the United States 1915 Part I

    Surface Water Supply of the United States 1915 Part I

    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 401 SURFACE WATER SUPPLY OF THE UNITED STATES 1915 PART I. NORTH ATLANTIC SIOPE DRAINAGE BASINS NATHAN C. GROVES, Chief Hydraulic Engineer C. H. PIERCE, C. C. COVERT, and G. C. STEVENS. District Engineers Prepared in cooperation with the States of MAIXE, VERMONT, MASSACHUSETTS, and NEW YORK WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT FEINTING OFFICE 1917 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 401 SURFACE WATER SUPPLY OF THE UNITED STATES 1915 PART I. NORTH ATLANTIC SLOPE DRAINAGE BASINS NATHAN C. GROVER, Chief Hydraulic Engineer C. H. PIERCE, C. C. COVERT; and G. C. STEVENS, District Engineers Geological Prepared in cooperation with the States MAINE, VERMONT, MASSACHUSETTS^! N«\f Yd] WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1917 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPEBINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT FEINTING OFFICE "WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 15 CENTS PER COPY V CONTENTS. Authorization and scope of work........................................... 7 Definition of terms....................................................... 8 Convenient equivalents.................................................... 9 Explanation of data...................................................... 11 Accuracy of field data and computed results................................ 12 Cooperation..............................................................
  • Newsletter 8 Page.Pub

    Newsletter 8 Page.Pub

    Raymond Waterways Newsletter Published by Raymond Waterways Protective Association “To protect and improve pond and lake water quality and foster watershed stewardship” June 2004 Dear Friends of Raymond Waterways; Inside this Issue: After experiencing a “non-winter” with cerned about and this one is very close to Milfoil Update 2 hardly any snow, we anxiously await a nor- us. Little Sebago Lake has a close relative mal summer, replete with warm tempera- of variable milfoil called Myrophyllum RWPA Structure 3 tures and sunny days. pinnatum. We know that this new (to us) Lake Associations 3 plant does not have flowers like variable First, a change of date... Thomas Pond 4 You may be a bit surprised by the early milfoil, making it even more difficult to Conservation Project arrival of this publication. We surmised identify! that most people’s interest in lake activities The first line of defense, our staff... Panther Pond 4 is greater in early summer rather than late We have been fortunate to acquire the ser- Watershed Survey in the season and it gives us a chance to let vices of Noralee Raymond as Executive Crescent & Raymond 5 you know about upcoming trainings and Director. She is in charge of education, Project Completed events, hence the change. Hope you agree. overall coordination, and is the person to Free Technical 5 And, what’s on our mind is... contact for all communications. She will Assistance Of course the milfoil situation. While it is be active in running both the Milfoil 2003 Water Quality 6 very true that Raymond is surrounded by Ranger Program and the Watershed Stew- Monitoring Results infected lakes (North-Parker Pond, East- ards Program.
  • 2006 Comprehensive Plan.Pdf

    2006 Comprehensive Plan.Pdf

    NAPLES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Acknowledgments 1 INTRODUCTION 3 What is a Comprehensive Plan? 3 How can a Comprehensive Plan serve the Town of Naples? 3 What is Smart Growth? 4 Benefits After Adoption 5 Public Participation in the Planning Process 5 Goals, Objectives and Policies 6 Implementation Strategies 6 SECTION 1: ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE FUTURE 8 1.1 Community Character 9 1.2 Survey Results 15 1.3 Vision Statement 20 SECTION 2: INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 23 2.1 The People of Naples 24 2.2 Housing 38 2.3 The Economy 54 2.4 Existing Land Use 62 2.5 Natural Resources Inventory 75 2.6 Agricultural and Forest Resources 109 2.7 Cultural Resources 112 2.8 Public Facilities and Services 115 2.9 Transportation 122 2.10 Recreation and Public Access 127 2.11 Fiscal Capacity 131 SECTION 3: SUMMARY AND FINDINGS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS AND FUTURE LAND USE NEEDS 139 3.1 Projected Growth and its Impacts 140 3.2 Projected Growth and What Naples Wants 142 3.3 Summary Listing of Planning Issues facing the Town of Naples 142 SECTION 4: GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES, AND STRATEGIES 148 4.1 Goals, Objectives, Policies and Strategies of the Town of Naples 149 4.1.1 Citizen Participation 150 4.1.2 Fiscal Policy 152 4.1.2.1 Capital Investment Plan 155 4.1.3 Public Facilities and Services 158 4.1.4 Recreation and Public Access 163 4.1.5 Cultural Resources 166 ii 4.1.6 Economic Expansion 170 4.1.7 Housing 176 4.1.8 Future Land Use 181 4.1.9 Transportation 186 4.1.10 Agriculture and Forest Resources 192 4.1.11 Water Resources 196 4.1.12 Critical Natural Resources 204 SECTION 5: FUTURE LAND USE PLAN 209 5.1 Future Land Use Planning Process 210 5.2 Future Land Use Map 210 SECTION 6: APPENDIX 215 A.
  • Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities

    Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities

    Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities Alaska Aialik Bay Alaska Highway Alcan Highway Anchorage Arctic Auk Lake Cape Prince of Wales Castle Rock Chilkoot Pass Columbia Glacier Cook Inlet Copper River Cordova Curry Dawson Denali Denali National Park Eagle Fairbanks Five Finger Rapids Gastineau Channel Glacier Bay Glenn Highway Haines Harding Gateway Homer Hoonah Hurricane Gulch Inland Passage Inside Passage Isabel Pass Juneau Katmai National Monument Kenai Kenai Lake Kenai Peninsula Kenai River Kechikan Ketchikan Creek Kodiak Kodiak Island Kotzebue Lake Atlin Lake Bennett Latouche Lynn Canal Matanuska Valley McKinley Park Mendenhall Glacier Miles Canyon Montgomery Mount Blackburn Mount Dewey Mount McKinley Mount McKinley Park Mount O’Neal Mount Sanford Muir Glacier Nome North Slope Noyes Island Nushagak Opelika Palmer Petersburg Pribilof Island Resurrection Bay Richardson Highway Rocy Point St. Michael Sawtooth Mountain Sentinal Island Seward Sitka Sitka National Park Skagway Southeastern Alaska Stikine Rier Sulzer Summit Swift Current Taku Glacier Taku Inlet Taku Lodge Tanana Tanana River Tok Tunnel Mountain Valdez White Pass Whitehorse Wrangell Wrangell Narrow Yukon Yukon River General Views—no specific location Alabama Albany Albertville Alexander City Andalusia Anniston Ashford Athens Attalla Auburn Batesville Bessemer Birmingham Blue Lake Blue Springs Boaz Bobler’s Creek Boyles Brewton Bridgeport Camden Camp Hill Camp Rucker Carbon Hill Castleberry Centerville Centre Chapman Chattahoochee Valley Cheaha State Park Choctaw County
  • The Maine Lake Science Center – Now a Reality by Peter Lowell LEA Board Votes to Buy the Science Center Property

    The Maine Lake Science Center – Now a Reality by Peter Lowell LEA Board Votes to Buy the Science Center Property

    Testing Buoy on Highland Lake The 2014 Milfoil Bill LEA Education Programs The buoy is large and yellow with solar More than a decade after the original are designed to create opportunities for panels mounted on it. There are two “Milfoil Bill” passed the Maine Legislature, life-long learning through place-based round mooring buoys near it that are a new bill will significantly modify a curricula offered in partnership with attached to anchors. long-standing funding inequity. local public schools and community Page 4 By Peter Lowell, Page 8 members. Page 10 Summer 2014 Free LEA Lake News The Maine Lake Science Center – Now a Reality by Peter Lowell LEA Board Votes to Buy the Science Center Property As kids growing up on Highland Lake, we never saw algae clouds that look like green cotton candy. The sand and gravel of the lake bottom was always clean and the rocks were clear of sediment. Unfortunately, these simple indicators of water quality decline are now widespread. Our work over 43 years has led us to conclude that Maine lakes are degrading because of continued watershed development and decline is being accelerated by climate change. All of our lakes have changed over the past few decades, and their future is certainly in doubt. For six years, LEA has studied the status of lake science and visiting lake centers around the country to learn their methods and establish relationships. LEA conducts more lake testing than anyone in Maine, and we feel that no one adequately understands the “tipping points” that lead to a decline in water quality.