DOCSLIB.ORG

ASME 160314.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ASME 160314.Pdf ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY DIVISION NEWSLETTER 14 MAR. 2016 If you need older URLs contact George at [email protected]. Please Note: “This newsletter contains articles that offer differing points of view regarding climate change, energy and other environmental issues. Any opinions expressed in this publication are the responses of the editor alone and do not represent the positions of the Environmental and Energy Engineering Division or the ASME.” George Holliday A. ENVIRONMENT 1. CLIMATE ALARMISM ON STEROIDS, WE ARE IN A “GLOBAL CLIMATE CRISIS” You just gotta love the phrase “unprecedented shift in temperature”, as if somehow people aren’t able to handle climate shifts say, like the difference in average annual temperature between New York and Miami (which is far greater than that caused by climate change), or the fact that humans simultaneously inhabit Antarctica and Death Valley, CA. No,… http://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/03/01/climate-alarmism-on-steroids-we-are-in-a-global-climate- crisis/ Don Shaw 1 2. JJDS Environmental is a full service Quality, Environmental and Safety consulting firm, formed in December 1999, which is dedicated to balancing legal requirements and cost. JJDS Environmental is a certified (SBA) small business located in Doylestown, PA (suburban Philadelphia); we are also a registered military (CCR), EPA, DOE, NASA and TDA contractor. JJDS Environmental's services include quality assurance and control programs, waste minimization/pollution prevention programs, safety and environmental auditing, compliance assistance programs, environmental permitting, USACE plan development and implementation, remediation services, construction oversight, start-up assistance, Environmental Management Systems, education and training programs, operator certification programs, peer review services, USACE/NAVFAC certified quality management, waste disposal contracting, expert testimony and contractor bid package preparation/evaluation. JJDS Environmental personnel include a USACE/NAVFAC Certified Quality Manager. Mr. Feldman, the Owner/Principal, has over 30 years industrial experience and over 20 years environmental experience. He earned a Bachelor of Science in Chemical Engineering at New Mexico State University in 1969. Before 2 beginning environmental work Mr. Feldman held a variety of engineering and production positions at industrial facilities. In 1980, he was the Environmental Manager at a large chemical plant in Illinois for Olin Corporation where he was responsible for overall compliance of the plant. Since then Mr. Feldman has held numerous positions in the environmental field with a heavy concentration on compliance monitoring and assistance for a wide range of industrial facilities. Mr. Feldman has been responsible for developing various environmental training tools and compliance assistance programs for both Olin and FMC Corporations. In addition, he has served on numerous industry trade association committees; he was a reviewer of the Chemical Manufacturer's Association RCRA [Resource Conservation and Recovery Act] Subpart CC compliance manual developed in association with EPA, and co-authored and edited CMA's Responsible Care¨ Pollution Prevention Code compliance manual. Mr. Feldman is currently ViceChair of the ASME Hazardous Waste Incinerator Operators Certification Committee and Chair of the Testing Sub-Committee. To view Mr. Feldman's resume "click here" 3. REPORT: BIN LADEN PLANNED TO DESTABILISE AMERICA USING THE CLIMATE ISSUE Guest essay by Eric Worrall Reuter’s reports that the terrorist Osama Bin Laden intended to use the climate issue to spread chaos in the United States, by calling for people concerned about greenhouse gasses to rise up and overthrow the government. According to Reuter’s; Osama bin Laden wrote a letter calling on the American people… http://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/03/01/terrorist-plan-to-destabilise-america-using-the-climate-issue/ 3 4. NEW PUBLICATION DEMONSTRATES THAT SCIENTISTS HAVE ROUTINELY EXAGGERATED THE “EVIL TWIN OF CLIMATE CHANGE” AKA OCEAN ACIDIFICATION A new paper published in the ICES Journal of Marine Science puts the issue of “ocean acidification” to the test, and finds that there has been significant exaggeration in the issue. The paper is: Applying organized scepticism to ocean acidification research “Ocean acidification” (OA), a change in seawater chemistry driven by increased uptake of atmospheric CO2… http://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/03/01/new-publication-demonstrates-that-scientists-have-routinely- exaggerated-the-evil-twin-of-climate-change-aka-ocean-acidification/ 5. CLIMATE MODELS ARE NOT SIMULATING EARTH’S CLIMATE – PART 4 Guest Post by Bob Tisdale Alternate Title: Climate Models Undermine the Hypothesis of Human-Induced Global Warming According to the hypothesis of human-induced global warming; manmade greenhouse gases create an energy imbalance at the top of the Earth’s atmosphere, which causes the Earth to retain heat. One of the hypothetical results of that retained heat is… http://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/03/01/climate-models-are-not-simulating-earths-climate-part-4/ 6. AGU, EXXON AND THE CORPORATE FUNDING DILEMMA Posted on February 29, 2016 | 173 Comments by Judith Curry . to assess whether our partner/sponsor statements are in conflict with our position statements and accepted scientific consensus. – Margaret Leinen, AGU President Scientists to AGU: Drop Exxon sponsorship The relevant information is compiled [here]. Excerpts: Today more than 100 geoscientists sent the following letter to the President of the American Geophysical Union (AGU) – the world’s largest association of Earth scientists – urging the association to end its sponsorship deal with ExxonMobil. The oil giant is currently under investigation by the New York and California Attorneys General for its long history of climate denial campaigns. Many notable scientists have signed on, including the former director of NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies James E. Hansen, the former President of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and Harvard Professor James J. McCarthy, Harvard Professor and author of Merchants of Doubt Naomi Oreskes, and Michael Mann– Director of the Earth System Science Center at Pennsylvania State University. The letter is the most recent example of a growing trend of scientists stepping out of their traditional roles to urge science institutions to cut ties to fossil fuel companies. Excerpts from the actual letter: We, the undersigned members of AGU (and other concerned geoscientists), write to ask you to please reconsider ExxonMobil’s sponsorship of the AGU Fall Meetings. As Earth scientists, we are deeply troubled by the well-documented complicity of ExxonMobil in climate denial and misinformation. For example, recent investigative journalism has shed light on the fact that Exxon, informed by their in-house scientists, has known about the devastating global warming effects of fossil fuel burning since the late 1970s, but spent the next decades funding misinformation campaigns to confuse the public, slander scientists, and sabotage science – the very science conducted by thousands of AGU members. Even today, Exxon continues to fund the American Legislative Exchange Council, a 4 lobbying group that routinely misrepresents climate science to US state legislators and attempts to block pro-renewable energy policies. Just last year, Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson downplayed the validity of climate models and the value of renewable energy policies. The impacts of Exxon’s tactics have been devastating. Thanks in part to Exxon, the American public remains confused and polarized about climate change. And thanks in part to Exxon, climate science- denying members of Congress and lobby groups operating at the state level remain a major obstacle to US efforts to mitigate climate change. But by allowing Exxon to appropriate AGU’s institutional social license to help legitimize the company’s climate misinformation, AGU is undermining its stated values as well as the work of many of its own members. While we recognize that some of AGU’s scientific disciplines are deeply tied to the fossil fuel industry, we are also increasingly aware of the tension within our community regarding how we should respond to the urgency of climate change as individual scientists and as institutions. It is time to bring this tension into the light and determine how an organization such as AGU should approach the major challenges of today to ensure that we truly are working for the benefit of humanity. In particular, as the world’s largest organization of Earth scientists, if we do not take an active stand against climate misinformation now, when will we? Further details from ClimateWire (as quoted by Marlo Lewis): AGU’s meeting is the largest earth science conference in the world. It attracts tens of thousands of scientists and requires a conference space so large that it is used by Apple Inc. and Google Inc. for their yearly developer meetings. There are hundreds of sessions on the science of climate change. Exxon Mobil is a prominent sponsor and recruiter at the meeting and paid AGU $35,000 last year. According to Climatewire, one of the signers–Peter Frumhoff of the Union of Concerned Scientists– stressed that petitioners are not asking AGU to cancel the sponsorships of all oil and gas companies, just Exxon. “AGU has set an unequivocal policy that restricts accepting funding from organizations that support or engage in misinformation on science,” he said. “That’s as it should be for any scientific
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Global Temperature Report, 1978 - 2003 the University of Alabama in Huntsville
    Global Temperature Report, 1978 - 2003 The University of Alabama in Huntsville Global Temperature Report 1978 - 2003 Earth System Science Center The University of Alabama in Huntsville Dr. John Christy & Dr. Roy Spencer December 8, 2003 Global Temperature Report, 1978 - 2003 The University of Alabama in Huntsville Global Temperature Report 1978 - 2003 Contents: 25 years of taking Earth’s temperature ......... p. 1 The atmosphere is warming ........................ p. 2 Confirming the temperature data .............. p. 3 Finding and correcting errors..................... p. 4 Conflicting climate data ............................ p. 5 The ongoing climate conundrum .............. p. 6 Earth’s climate is constantly changing ......... p. 7 Climate and environmental priorities....... p. 8 Map of regional climate trends ................. p. 9 Biographical information......................... p. 10 Selected research publications ................. p. 11 Monthly means of lower tropospherepp. 12-14 Global temperature report: 11/03 ..... pp. 15-16 © 2003 Earth System Science Center, The University of Alabama in Huntsville UAH is a Space Grant University. • An Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Institution. Global Temperature Report, 1978 - 2003 The University of Alabama in Huntsville 25 years of taking Earth’s temperature In early November 1978 a The microwave sensors “see” sensors, Spencer teamed with Dr. microwave sensor aboard the huge volumes of atmosphere — John Christy from The University National Oceanic and Atmo- about 50,000 cubic kilometers for of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) spheric Administration’s TIROS each reading. to analyze the data. polar-orbiting satellite started The data didn’t fit the forecast They concentrated on data scanning the Earth’s atmosphere. models and, as day-to-day tools from two altitude ranges: The It was looking at the intensity for forecasters, the microwave lower troposphere, from sea level of microwaves emitted by oxygen sensors weren’t very useful.
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite Measurements of Warming in the Troposphere
    This is the print version of the Skeptical Science article 'Satellites show no warming in the troposphere', which can be found at http://sks.to/troposphere. Satellite measurements of warming in the troposphere What The Science Says: Satellite measurements match model results apart from in the tropics. There is uncertainty with the tropical data due to how various teams correct for satellite drift. The U.S. Climate Change Science Program concludes the discrepancy is most likely due to data errors. Climate Myth: Satellites show no warming in the troposphere "Satellite measurements indicate an absence of significant global warming since 1979, the very period that human carbon dioxide emissions have been increasing rapidly. The satellite data signal not only the absence of substantial human-induced warming but also provide an empirical test of the greenhouse hypothesis - a test that the hypothesis fails." (Bob Carter) From 1978, a series of satellites have measured atmospheric temperature in the troposphere and stratosphere. The data is spliced together and adjusted for time-dependent biases by the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH), headed by John Christy and Roy Spencer. The initial results showed a warming trend of only 0.09°C per decade, well below the surface temperature trend of 0.17°C per decade. Climate models predict the troposphere should show greater warming than the surface. UAH versus RSS In November 2005, Carl Mears and Frank Wentz at Remote Sensing Systems (RSS) performed an independent analysis of the satellite data. In the process, they found an algebraic error in the UAH analysis. With the correction made, the UAH trend was now 0.12°C per decade - larger but still less than the surface trend.
    [Show full text]
  • New Studies May Contribute to the Reconciliation
    SOME CONVERGENCE OF GLOBAL WARMING ESTIMATES New Studies May Contribute to the Reconciliation of Satellite, Radio Sonde, Surface Data Indicating Recent Temperature Changes the Lower End of IPPC Projections – read more here Tech Central Station, 11 August 2005 By Roy Spencer In one of a trio of new global warming papers in Science, Mears & Wentz (2005) address what they consider to be a large source of uncertainty in our (University of Alabama in Huntsville, "UAH") satellite estimate for global lower tropospheric ("LT") temperature trends since 1979. The satellite measurements come from the Microwave Sounding Units (MSUs) and Advanced Microwave Sounding Units (AMSUs) flying on NOAA's polar orbiting weather satellites. The UAH estimate of the globally averaged trend since 1979 to the present has been +0.09 deg. C/decade, considerably below the surface thermometer estimate that has been hovering around +0.20 deg. C/decade for the same period of record. This discrepancy between the UAH satellite LT trends and the surface thermometer trends has caused some consternation, since what we understand of atmospheric physics suggests that sustained warming at the surface should be amplified with height in the troposphere, not reduced. Mears & Wentz, who are very capable remote sensing experts from Remote Sensing Systems ("RSS", Santa Rosa, California), found that the LT trend was particularly sensitive to the UAH method for removing the drift of the satellites through the local observing time. The satellites are launched into sun-synchronous orbits that are meant to cross over the same Earth locations at approximately the same time each day. But since the satellites do not have on- board propulsion, the satellites fall slowly back to Earth, which changes their orbital characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • 109Th Congress House Hearings] [From the U.S
    <DOC> [109th Congress House Hearings] [From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access] [DOCID: f:31362.wais] QUESTIONS SURROUNDING THE 'HOCKEY STICK' TEMPERATURE STUDIES: IMPLICATIONS FOR CLIMATE CHANGE ASSESSMENTS HEARINGS BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND INVESTIGATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JULY 19 AND JULY 27, 2006 Serial No. 109-128 Printed for the use of the Committee on Energy and Commerce Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/house U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 31-362 PDF WASHINGTON : 2006 ______________________________________________________________________ For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE Joe Barton, Texas, Chairman Ralph M. Hall, Texas John D. Dingell, Michigan Michael Bilirakis, Florida Ranking Member Vice Chairman Henry A. Waxman, California Fred Upton, Michigan Edward J. Markey, Massachusetts Cliff Stearns, Florida Rick Boucher, Virginia Paul E. Gillmor, Ohio Edolphus Towns, New York Nathan Deal, Georgia Frank Pallone, Jr., New Jersey Ed Whitfield, Kentucky Sherrod Brown, Ohio Charlie Norwood, Georgia Bart Gordon, Tennessee Barbara Cubin, Wyoming Bobby L. Rush, Illinois John Shimkus, Illinois Anna G. Eshoo, California Heather Wilson, New Mexico Bart Stupak, Michigan John B. Shadegg, Arizona Eliot L. Engel, New York Charles W. "Chip" Pickering, Mississippi Albert R. Wynn, Maryland Vice Chairman Gene Green, Texas Vito Fossella, New York Ted Strickland, Ohio Roy Blunt, Missouri Diana DeGette, Colorado Steve Buyer, Indiana Lois Capps, California George Radanovich, California Mike Doyle, Pennsylvania Charles F.
    [Show full text]
  • 12. Minskar Värmeutstrålningen Till Rymden När Jorden Blir Varmare?
    48 12. Minskar värmeutstrålningen till rymden när jorden blir varmare? FN:s klimatmodeller förutsäger också att värmeutstrålningen från jorden ska minska när jordytan värms till följd av växthuseffekten. I bilden till vänster visas förutsägelserna från 11 av FN:s datorsimuleringar, och i mitten resultaten från mätningar gjorda under 30 års tid med Erbe/Ceres-satelliterna. Resultatet visar att när den globala medeltemperaturen stiger, ökar också värmeutstrålningen till rymden. Klimatet är med andra ord inte så känsligt för växthuseffekten som FN:s klimatpanel antar. Intressant nog visar data från NOAA (t.h.) också att jordens reflektion av solstrålning i form av värme ökat under samma period, när den globala uppvärmningen officiellt antas ha accelererat på allvar. I själva verket har både FN och James Hansen successivt justerat ner sitt antagande om klimatets känslighet (nedan). Bland skeptiker uppskattas klimatkänsligheten oftast till 1 eller lägre, och observationerna talar för att den snarare är i stor- leksordningen 0,5 på grund av ökad bildning av låga, vita moln, som reflekterar solljuset (se fråga 27), och andra avkylande effekter - dvs att de sekundära effekterna av växthuseffekten inte förstärker, utan försvagar den direkta uppvärmning som orsakas av växthusgaserna. Svante Arrhenius, som studerade växthuseffekten redan på 1800-talet, beräknade den till hela 5 grader C 1896, men ändrade sin bedömning redan 10 år senare till bara 1,6 grader C. Allt du behöver veta om KLIMATHOTET 49 13. Accelererar uppvärmningen? De grafer som beskriver temperaturförändringarna bygger ofta på ”avvikelser från det normala”, där temperaturerna jämförs med en vis tidpunkt eller tidsperiod. Eftersom avvikelserna handlar om tiondelar av en grad, spänner diagrammen också mellan ungefär -1,5 och +1,5.
    [Show full text]
  • Rn ,Evlew Rl +Rl
    ic rn ,evlew rl +rl .+-- L ..... ,r ir +. - ...... --++'_ 2 ,, __ .... _-- +++ TII+I L.... +I T+ ++ + + . +"+-m-- -- _ + __ ==_+ NASA Conference Publication 3126 NASA/MSFC FY91 Global Scale Atmospheric Processes Research Program Review Edited by F. W. Leslie NASA George C. Marshall Space Flight Center Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama Proceedings of a workshop held at NASA George C. Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, Alabama May 28-31, 1991 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of Management Scientific and Technical Information Program 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Global Water Cycle Franklin Robertson, John Christy, Steve Goodman, Tim Miller, Dan Fitzjarrald, Bill Lapenta, and Shouping Wang ................................................. Basic Studies of Baroclinic Flows T. L. Miller, S.-H. Chou, F. W. Leslie, H.-I. Lu, and K. A. Butler ........................................ Climate Dynamics Experiments Using a GCM Simulations D. Fitzjarrald, F. Robertson, J. Christy, H. Lu, B. Sohn, and J. Srikishen ......................................... MAMS - High Resolution Atmospheric Moisture/Surface Properties (460-21-30-90) Gary J. Jedlovec, Anthony R. Guillory, Ron Suggs, Robert J. Atkinson, and Grant S. Carlson .......................... AMPR/SSMI Data Comparisons Roy W. Spencer, Robbie Hood, and Frank LaFontaine ................. 13 Atmospheric Aerosol and Doppler Lidar Studies J. Rothermel, D.A. Bowdle, V. Srivastava, M. Jarzembski, D. Cutten, and E.W. McCaul, Jr ..................... 15 Global Lightning Studies Steven J. Goodman, Pat Wright, Hugh Christian, Richard Blakeslee, Dennis Buechler, and Greg Scharfen ............. 19 WetNet Operations H. Michael Goodman, Matt Smith, Vada LaFontaine, Frank LaFontaine, and Don Moss .................................... 21 Advanced Visualization Techniques Mike Botts ........................................................ 25 Interactive Access and Management for Four-Dimensional Environmental Data Sets Using McIDAS William L.
    [Show full text]
  • Temperature Trends in the Lower Atmosphere: Steps for Understanding and Reconciling Differences
    SAP-1.1 Prospectus for Temperature Trends in the Lower Atmosphere: Steps for Understanding and Reconciling Differences rogram ce P ien Sc e g n Lead Agency a National Oceanic and Atmospheric h Administration (NOAA) C Contributing Agencies e t National Aeronautics and Space a Administration (NASA) Department of Energy (DOE) m National Science Foundation (NSF) i l C . S . U 28 January 2005 CCSP Synthesis and Assessment Product 1.1 Assessment Product Synthesis and CCSP Agency Leads Tom Karl, Chris Miller, Bill Murray Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Rick Petty Department of Energy Eric Fetzer National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jay Fein National Science Foundation For More Information U.S. Climate Change Science Program 1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 250 Washington, DC 20006 USA +1.202.223.6262 (voice) +1.202.223.3065 (fax) http://www.climatescience.gov/ This prospectus has been prepared according to the Guidelines for Producing Climate Change Science Program (CCSP) Synthesis and Assessment Products. The prospectus was reviewed and approved by the CCSP Interagency Committee. The document describes the focus of this synthesis and assessment product, and the process that will be used to prepare it. The document does not express any regulatory policies of the United States or any of its agencies, or make any findings of fact that could serve as predicates for regulatory action. U.S. CLIMATE C HANGE S CIENCE P ROGRAM Prospectus for Synthesis and Assessment Product 1.1* Temperature Trends in the Lower Atmosphere: Steps for Understanding and Reconciling Differences Chief Editor: Thomas R. Karl Associate Editors: Christopher D.
    [Show full text]