Vegetation Survey and GIS-Based Zonation of the Fond D'albaretz Forest, Praslin, Seychelles

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vegetation Survey and GIS-Based Zonation of the Fond D'albaretz Forest, Praslin, Seychelles Research Collection Master Thesis Vegetation survey and GIS-based zonation of the Fond d'Albaretz Forest, Praslin, Seychelles Author(s): Farrèr, Claudia; Hertach, Martin Publication Date: 2009 Permanent Link: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-005791819 Rights / License: In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted This page was generated automatically upon download from the ETH Zurich Research Collection. For more information please consult the Terms of use. ETH Library Vegetation Survey and GIS- based Zonation of the Fond D’Albaretz Forest, Praslin, Seychelles Master Thesis in Environmental Sciences Claudia Farrèr Martin Hertach March, 2009 Supervision: Dr. Karl Fleischmann and Prof. Peter J. Edwards Institute of Integrative Biology Zurich Abstract The Seychelles flora displays a high degree of endemism and various endemic woody species are threatened according to the IUCN Red List. The habitats of rare endemic species are often confined to boulder fields and glacis. Threats are competition by invasive species, forest fires and anthropogenic habitat degradation. To preserve habitats it is crucial to understand possible interconnections between the vegetation composition, boulder fields and fire disturbances. We investigated these interconnections in the area of the Fond D’Albaretz on Praslin Island, which is part of a unique ecological framework and shelters large interlinked boulder fields. An extensive database on the vegetation composition was acquired by means of count-plot analysis and trail transecting. Vegetation zonations were conducted in terms of (i) nativeness, (ii) protection values and (iii) presence of red listed species. Connection between the occurrence of boulder fields and palms was studied with a boulder field classification. Spatial data on the occurrence of boulder fields and large patches of the fern Dicranopteris linearis were gained using satellite images, a geographic information system (GIS) and the global positioning system (GPS). We also studied post-fire succession by qualitatively monitoring recently affected areas. To visualize the risk of the induction and the spread of fire, we produced a fire risk map by including topographic, anthropogenic and vegetation-based parameters. Based on prominence values, we found that 75.4% of the vegetation of the Fond D’Albaretz is native and 20.7% is endemic. Twenty-one different endemic species were found, one of which was classified as “critically endangered”, one as “endangered”, eleven as “vulnerable”, five as “near threatened” and three as “least concern”. The vegetation zonation reveals a uniform high protection value of the forest and is therefore comparable to the Vallée de Mai. We found a significant correlation between the presence of big boulders and palms (adults and saplings). We also found a moderate significance for the correlation between the presence of big boulders and threatened species. Interpretation of satellite images and spatial mapping in the field showed that boulder fields cover an area of 46’437 m 2. Resprouting in post- fire-areas is dominated by endemic species. Most of the area of the Fond D’Albaretz shows a high risk of spreading or inducing forest fires. The Fond D’Albaretz is of high ecological importance due to its consistently high protection value, its comparability to the Vallée de Mai and its relics of original low-altitude forest. The extensive boulder fields are a hideaway for threatened plant species and protect them from forest fires. The limited presence of Dicranopteris l. and invasive species suggests that forest fires only rarely affected the Fond D’Albaretz in the past. The protective force of boulder fields against fires, the absence of preceding disturbances and the ecological framework seem to be the main reasons for the high ecological value distinctive of the Fond D’Albaretz. The use of GIS proved to be very valuable and the newly established fire risk map can be used as a measure to effectively fight forest fires in the future. Keywords : Ecological importance, Boulder field classification, Protection value, Vegetation zoning, Dicranopteris l. , Red listed woody plant species, Geographic information system, Fire risk map, Fond D’Albaretz, Praslin, Seychelles. Acknowledgements We would like to thank our supervisors Dr. Karl Fleischmann and Prof. Peter J. Edwards from the Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH, for the possibility to write this master-thesis and for their overall support. Special thanks go to Matthieu and Bart LaBuschagne and their families who made this work possible. Your support with all our daily life and work problems was fantastic. Matt, we thank you for all the adventurous trips in the forest. We have spent an unforgettable time in the Seychelles! Many thanks go also to the staff of the Hotel Coco de Mer for cheering up our days, for cooking and joining us in the staff canteen and for their kindness to provide internet access. A special thank goes to our neighbours Sudarsana Weliwitigoda and Don Jagath Katugampola with his wife Ayomi and their daughter Suchali. Thank you for all the good times we spent at your home, the delicious food and all the nice talks. We will miss you! Many thanks go to the Plant Conservation Action group (PCA) and especially to Katy Beaver, Frauke Fleischer-Dogley and Lindsay Chong Seng for administrative help, accommodation and inputs for our work. It is always a great pleasure to meet you! We would like to thank Victorin Laboudallon for the insightful walk and helping us with identifying species. We are thankful to Justin Prosper from the GIS-Unit at the Policy Planning and Services Division of the Ministry of Environment on Mahé for providing us with all the needed spatial data of Praslin. We are grateful to the Praslin Development Fund (PDF), where we thank the chairman Mr. Michel Gardette for organising us the permit to visit the Fond Ferdinand Nature Reserve and Micheal Gill who was a great guide in the field and helped us to locate former plots. Special thanks go to Patrizia Frei for statistical support, inputs for writing the report and unforgettable two weeks in the Seychelles. We thank Karsten Rohweder and Hans-Heini Vogel from the Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH, for providing us with even in the tropics astonishing good working laptops and for their technical support by finishing our thesis. Last but not least, we would like to thank our parents for their overall support. Content 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................1 2. Methods ........................................................................................................................................4 2.1 General principles.................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Trail transecting........................................................................................................................................ 4 2.3 Count-plot analysis................................................................................................................................... 6 2.4 Photo monitoring.....................................................................................................................................7 2.5 Boulder field classification....................................................................................................................... 8 2.6 Vegetation zoning..................................................................................................................................... 9 2.7 Dicranopteris linearis survey......................................................................................................................13 2.8 Boulder field mapping ...........................................................................................................................14 2.9 Qualitative monitoring of post-fire areas...............................................................................................14 2.10 Fire risk map.........................................................................................................................................15 3. Results ....................................................................................................................................... 17 3.1 Fond D’Albaretz - State of the forest .....................................................................................................17 3.1.1 General findings.......................................................................................................................17 3.1.2 Prominence along trail transects..............................................................................................17 3.1.3 Prominence within sampling plots ..........................................................................................19 3.1.4 Red listed species......................................................................................................................21 3.2 Boulder field classification.....................................................................................................................22 3.2.1 Palms vs. dicotyledonous trees.................................................................................................23 3.2.2 Threatened species vs. invasive species....................................................................................24 3.3.
Recommended publications
  • (J. Arn. Clear', Certainly Fosberg (Occas. Again Species
    BLUMEA 23 (1977) 449—474 Notes on Asiatic, Pacific, and Australian Diospyros A.J.G.H. Kostermans c/o Herbarium Bogoriense, Bogor, Indonesia Summary In order alphabetical 56 species of Diospyros (Ebenaceae) are treated. Of these, 39 species are proposed as in new, 7 specific names are new combinations, 3 specific names appear a new status, and I as a new 6 listed in relation miscellaneous name; species are to notes or to synonymy. the the Flora of the A revision of Ebenaceae for new Ceylon gave me opportunity in 1974 to hunt during three months for Diospyros in Ceylon. The revisional work confronted me with Bakhuizen van den Brink Sr.'s monograph of he had treated also Diospyros (Bull. Jard. Bot. Buitenzorg, III, 15, 1936—1941), as extra-malesian species. Bakhuizen's of which The greatest headache was treatment Diospyros ferrea, in he had that head Howard lumped so many species, nobody could make or tail ofit any more. & Norlindh Arb. called the 'inconsistent and less than (J. Arn. 43, 1962: 100) monograph clear', certainly an understatement. started Fosberg (Occas. Papers B.P. Bishop Mus. 15, 1939: 121) to extract again species from Bakhuizen's conglomerate, but followed him in so far, that he considered the of. Hawaiian D. sandwicensis a subspecies D. ferrea. A. C. Smith 0. Arn. Arb. 52, 1971) and for Pacific Green (Kew Bull. 23, 1969) cleared problems species. well ofrelated I believe that Bakhuizen, who disentangled fairly a similar group species who had started (D. peregrina group), had been misled by his predecessor Hiern, the in the D.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Archives Christopher N. Kaiser-Bunbury, Diego P. Vázquez
    1 Ecological Archives 2 3Christopher N. Kaiser-Bunbury, Diego P. Vázquez, Martina Stang, and Jaboury Ghazoul. 2014. 4Determinants of the microstructure of plant-pollinator networks. Ecology. 5 6Appendix A: Detailed supplementary information on the methods, including tables and figures 7 8 A.1 Plant–pollinator networks 9In total, 97 flower visitor taxa were recorded, of which 14 taxa, belonging to the groups of 10spiders, crickets, true bugs (hemiptera) and ants, were excluded from the networks as they were 11not considered pollinators of the inselberg plants. Pollinators were identified to species level for 1228 taxa (34%) and to morpho-species level for the remaining 55 taxa (66%; hereafter all 13pollinator taxa are referred to as ‘pollinator species’). Morpho-species were not pooled based on 14morphological traits such as size, but they were distinguished at the smallest possible level 15without taxonomic determination and assigned a species code. Flower visitors were recorded as 16pollinators when they touched the sexual parts of flowers. Sampling of interactions was 17conducted by the same three observers throughout the 8-month flowering season and sampling 18was standardized between observers fortnightly. We used equal observation periods for all plant 19species to reduce sampling bias and to collect data on interaction frequency independent of size 20constraints and flower abundance (Ollerton and Cranmer 2002). 21 To assess the effect of sampling on network dissimilarities we conducted a rarefaction 22analysis (Hurlbert 1971, Heck et al. 1975). We calculated Bray-Curtis dissimilarities (see Section 23D below for a detailed description on dissimilarity matrices) between rarefied interaction 24matrices sampled at four different proportions (0.8, 0.6, 0.4 and 0.2) and compared the resulting 25mean ± 95% CI dissimilarities of the rarefied matrices to the dissimilarity between the original 26matrices.
    [Show full text]
  • 089256/EU XXIV. GP Eingelangt Am 27/07/12
    089256/EU XXIV. GP Eingelangt am 27/07/12 COUNCIL OF Brussels, 27 July 2012 THE EUROPEAN UNION 12957/12 ENV 650 PECHE 295 WTO 279 COVER NOTE from: European Commission date of receipt: 26 July 2012 to: General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union No Cion doc.: D021920/01 Subject: Commission Regulation (EU) No …/.. of XXX amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein Delegations will find attached Commission document D021920/01. ________________________ Encl.: D021920/01 12957/12 KS/cm 1 DG E 1A EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX D021920/01 […](2011) XXX draft COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No …/.. of XXX amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein EN EN COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No …/.. of XXX amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 of 9 December 1996 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein1, and in particular Article 19(5) thereof, Whereas: (1) Regulation (EC) No 338/97 lists animal and plant species in respect of which trade is restricted or controlled. Those lists incorporate the lists set out in the Appendices to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), hereinafter ‘the Convention’.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for Seychelles
    AFB/PPRC.10/15 3 December 2012 Adaptation Fund Board Project and Programme Review Committee Tenth Meeting Bonn, 11-12 November 2012 PROPOSAL FOR SEYCHELLES AFB/PPRC.10/14 I. Background 1. The Operational Policies and Guidelines for Parties to Access Resources from the Adaptation Fund, adopted by the Adaptation Fund Board, state in paragraph 41 that regular adaptation project and programme proposals, i.e. those that request funding exceeding US$ 1 million, would undergo either a one-step, or a two-step approval process. In case of the one- step process, the proponent would directly submit a fully-developed project proposal. In the two- step process, the proponent would first submit a brief project concept, which would be reviewed by the Project and Programme Review Committee (PPRC) and would have to receive the approval by the Board. In the second step, the fully-developed project/programme document would be reviewed by the PPRC, and would finally require Board’s approval. 2. The Templates Approved by the Adaptation Fund Board (Operational Policies and Guidelines for Parties to Access Resources from the Adaptation Fund, Annex 3) do not include a separate template for project and programme concepts but provide that these are to be submitted using the project and programme proposal template. The section on Adaptation Fund Project Review Criteria states: For regular projects using the two-step approval process, only the first four criteria will be applied when reviewing the 1st step for regular project concept. In addition, the information provided in the 1st step approval process with respect to the review criteria for the regular project concept could be less detailed than the information in the request for approval template submitted at the 2nd step approval process.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation / Doctoral Thesis
    DISSERTATION / DOCTORAL THESIS Titel der Dissertation /Title of the Doctoral Thesis „Phylogenetic community structure assessment of a mixed Dipterocarp forest using DNA barcoding and molecular phylogeny of the dominant tree family Dipterocarpaceae“ verfasst von / submitted by Jacqueline Heckenhauer, BSc, MSc angestrebter akademischer Grad / in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Wien, 2017 / Vienna 2017 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt / A 794 685 437 degree programme code as it appears on the student record sheet: Dissertationsgebiet lt. Studienblatt / Biologie/Biology field of study as it appears on the student record sheet: Betreut von / Supervisor: ao. Univ.-Prof. i. R. Dipl.-Biol. Mag. Dr. Mary Rosabelle Samuel ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all I would like to express my deep gratitude to my supervisor Prof. Rosabelle Samuel for giving me the opportunity to write my PhD thesis about such an interesting topic, for her excellent supervision, and for supporting me to participate at conferences. She always had time when questions arose. I would also like to thank her for the helpful suggestions and the constructive criticism regarding the preparations of the manuscripts. I would like to thank all collaborators and co-authors for their great professional support, especially, Dr. Kamariah Abu Salim, for enabling trouble-free field work by dealing with the export permits and providing material; Ass. Prof. Ovidiu Paun, for being a brilliant advisor regarding the RADseq, during library preparation, as well as with analysis and interpretation of RADseq data; Prof. Mark W. Chase, for interesting debates during his visits to Vienna and his help in editing English texts; Charles Bullard Professor Peter S.
    [Show full text]
  • CITES Appendices I, II and III Valid from 22 December 2011
    CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA Appendices I, II and III valid from 22 December 2011 Interpretation 1. Species included in these Appendices are referred to: a) by the name of the species; or b) as being all of the species included in a higher taxon or designated part thereof. 2. The abbreviation “spp.” is used to denote all species of a higher taxon. 3. Other references to taxa higher than species are for the purposes of information or classification only. The common names included after the scientific names of families are for reference only. They are intended to indicate the species within the family concerned that are included in the Appendices. In most cases this is not all of the species within the family. 4. The following abbreviations are used for plant taxa below the level of species: a) “ssp.” is used to denote subspecies; and b) “var(s).” is used to denote variety (varieties). 5. As none of the species or higher taxa of FLORA included in Appendix I is annotated to the effect that its hybrids shall be treated in accordance with the provisions of Article III of the Convention, this means that artificially propagated hybrids produced from one or more of these species or taxa may be traded with a certificate of artificial propagation, and that seeds and pollen (including pollinia), cut flowers, seedling or tissue cultures obtained in vitro, in solid or liquid media, transported in sterile containers of these hybrids are not subject to the provisions of the Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • No 1158/2012 of 27 November 2012 Amending Council Regu­ Lation (EC) No 338/97 on the Protection of Species of Wild Fauna and F Lora by Regulating Trade Therein
    ISSN 1977-0677 Official Journal L 339 of the European Union Volume 55 English edition Legislation 12 December 2012 Contents II Non-legislative acts REGULATIONS ★ Commission Regulation (EU) No 1158/2012 of 27 November 2012 amending Council Regu­ lation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and f lora by regulating trade therein . 1 Price: EUR 4 Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period. The titles of all other acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. EN 12.12.2012 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 339/1 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1158/2012 of 27 November 2012 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, mapingo, Diospyros masoalensis, Diospyros mcphersonii, Diospyros meeusiana, Diospyros microrhombus, Diospyros montigena, Diospyros myriophylla, Diospyros myrtifolia, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Diospyros myrtilloides, Diospyros natalensis, Diospyros Union, neraudii, Diospyros nigricans, Diospyros nodosa, Diospyros obducta, Diospyros occlusa, Diospyros olacinoides, Diospyros onivensis, Diospyros parifolia, Diospyros parvifolia, Diospyros Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 of perreticulata, Diospyros perrieri, Diospyros pervillei, Diospyros 9 December 1996 on the protection of species
    [Show full text]
  • A Kertészeti Növénytan Növényismereti Anyaga, 1991) Összeállították
    SZENT ISTVÁN EGYETEM KERTÉSZETTUDOMÁNYI KAR NÖVÉNYTANI TANSZÉK, SOROKSÁRI BOTANIKUS KERT A KERTÉSZETI NÖVÉNYTAN Növényismereti kompendiuma 2.32 Budapest, 2000 június 2 Ebben a jegyzékben azokat a növénytaxonokat adjuk közre rendszertani sorrendben, amelyek a KERTÉSZETI NÖVÉNYTAN 2. és 3. félévének foglalkozásán, azaz a NÖVÉNY- RENDSZERTAN; valamint a NÖVÉNYFÖLDRAJZ, TÁRSULÁSTAN ÉS ÖKOLÓGIA témájú előadások, gyakorlatok anyagának elsajátításához, továbbá az időközi beszámolók, kollokvium, stb., és a növénytani tanulmányokat lezáró növénytani szigorlathoz szükséges, annak alapját, taxonómiai kereteit képezik. A felsorolt fajok fontosságát a következő kiemelésekkel jelöljük: Vastag szedéssel jelüljök azokat a taxonokat, melyek ismerete hiányában a hallgatók nem mehetnek át a növényrendszertan és növényföldrajz vizsgákon. Normál szedéssel jelöljük a növényrendszertan és növényföldrajz tárgy törzsanyagának többi taxonját. Apró betűvel jelöltök a törzsanyaghoz nem tartozó, de a rendszer részét képező taxonokat. Az időközbeni módosításokat, a listától való esetleges eltéréseket a foglalkozásokon közöljük és a növényismereti anyag újabb átdolgozásaiban rögzítjük. Ezért az „elhanyagolható” és a „feltétlenül fontos” taxonok megjelölésétől el kellett tekintenünk. Minden fontosabb hajtásos növénycsalád neve alatt megadjuk az adott taxon legfontosabb jellemzőit. Ilyen rendszerben kérdezzük vissza a 2. félév végi gyakorlaton a növényismereti anyagot. A család feldolgozásához megadott rövidítések a következők: B: jellemző vegetatív bélyeg, habitus,
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices I, II and III
    BGBl. III - Ausgegeben am 13. April 2012 - Nr. 69 1 von 46 CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA Appendices I, II and III valid from 22 December 2011 Interpretation 1. Species included in these Appendices are referred to: a) by the name of the species; or b) as being all of the species included in a higher taxon or designated part thereof. 2. The abbreviation “spp.” is used to denote all species of a higher taxon. 3. Other references to taxa higher than species are for the purposes of information or classification only. The common names included after the scientific names of families are for reference only. They are intended to indicate the species within the family concerned that are included in the Appendices. In most cases this is not all of the species within the family. 4. The following abbreviations are used for plant taxa below the level of species: a) “ssp.” is used to denote subspecies; and b) “var(s).” is used to denote variety (varieties). 5. As none of the species or higher taxa of FLORA included in Appendix I is annotated to the effect that its hybrids shall be treated in accordance with the provisions of Article III of the Convention, this means that artificially propagated hybrids produced from one or more of these species or taxa may be traded with a certificate of artificial propagation, and that seeds and pollen (including pollinia), cut flowers, seedling or tissue cultures obtained in vitro, in solid or liquid media, transported in sterile containers of these hybrids are not subject to the provisions of the Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • 1Volution De La Mycohщtщrotrophie Chez Les Orchidщes
    = == ==== = = = ======= = = = ==== = = 54:7=4'9*3.7=1*=,7&)*=)*= = == = == = .8(.51.3 *=a=.414,.*=)*8=45:1&9.438=*9=(414,.*= 472&9.43=)4(947&1* =a=.414,.*=)*=1;41:9.43=*9=(414,.*= (41*=4(947&1* =a=>89T2*8=39S,7S8=*3=.414,.*`=,74342.*`=S48(.*3(*8`= >)748(.*3(*8=*9= !3;.7433*2*39= = 57S8*39S*=*9=84:9*3:*=5:'1.6:*2*39== = = 5&7= #S1&3.*=$%&= = '*=,3=2&.=,**3= = = = ;41:9.43=)*=1&=2>(4-S9S749745-.*=(-*?=1*8=47(-.)S*8= = = = = *2'7*8=):=/:7>=a= = &55479*:78=a= #_=.-.*77>=&.11*7= = 74+*88*:7`=03.;*78.9S=)*=1&=$S:3.43= = = #2*=#&7.&3,*1&=.71&3)&= 1-&7,S*=)*=$*(-*7(-*`=03.;*78.9S=)*=.:7.3`== = = = = = = 9&1.* = = =&2.3&9*:78=a= #_=#&7(83)7S=*1488*== 74+*88*:7`=03.;*78.9S=)*=#4395*11.*7=== = = #2*= 11&.7*=5&2*8.3== 74+*88*:7`=03.;*78.9S=)*=&7.8=6= = = = #_=54>1*=#(0*>= = 74+*88*:7`=03.;*78.9S=)*=#4395*11.*7== = = #_=$.(-&7)=&9*2&3= = 74+*88*:7`=#:8S:2=) .894.7*=8&9:7*11*=)*== = = = = = = '43)7*8=$4>&:2*803.= = = = = = 1 = = = = = = = = = 7S&2':1*= = = 1*99*=9-T8*=*89=&;&39=94:9=)S).S*=A=(*:==6:.=5&79&,*39=(*99*=5&88.43=(422:3*=54:7= 1*8=47(-.)S*8=*9=6:.=2439=&.)S*=94:9=&:=143,=)*=2*8=7*(-*7(-*8`=5&7=1*:7=57S8*3(*`=1*:78= (438*.18`=1*:78=6:*89.438`=1*:7=(:7.48.9S=*9=1*:7=S2*7;*.11*2*39=(422:3.(&9.+_= 03*= +&O43= )*= 7*2*7(.*7= 94:8= (*8= 47(-.)45-.1*8`= 349&22*39= 1*8= 47(-.)45-.1*8= &2&9*:78`=8*7&=)*=5:'1.*7=)*8=&79.(1*8=)*=;:1,&7.8&9.43=A=5&79.7=)*=2&=9-T8*_=<&.=)S/A=5:'1.S= 974.8=&79.(1*8=)*=;:1,&7.8&9.43`=97T8=1&7,*8=2&.8=)&:97*8=8:.;7439_=<&.=(-4.8.=)*=7S).,*7=:3*= 8>39-T8*=*3=+7&3O&.8=51:8=143,:*=*9=)S9&.11S*=6:*=3S(S88&.7*= 54:7= :3*=
    [Show full text]
  • Myxomycete Biodiversity on Five Islands of the Seychelles
    Zootaxa 4851 (2): 201–244 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4851.2.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:65C29C2A-F82F-4F3F-9454-1BFBD474D427 Myxomycete biodiversity on five islands of the Seychelles TETIANA KRYVOMAZ1*, ALAIN MICHAUD2 & STEVEN L. STEPHENSON3 1 Kyiv National Construction and Architecture University, 31, Povitroflotskyi prospect, UA-03680, Kiev, Ukraine 2 93 route de la Croizette, FR-38360, Engins, France 3 University of Arkansas, Department of Biological Sciences, Fayetteville, Arkansas USA-72701 *Corresponding author 1* �Kryvomaz – [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7426-8745 2 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8073-5899 3 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9207-8037 Abstract A survey of myxomycete diversity on five islands of the Seychelles yielded 105 species and 10 infra-specific taxa, which included 89 species on La Digue, 66 on Praslin, 63 on Mahé, 31 on Curieuse and 4 on Félicité. Among these records, 64 species are new for the Seychelles and together with data from the literature, 143 species of myxomycetes are now known for all of the Seychelles. Most collecting on all five islands was carried out in low elevation areas. Forty-four species (73% of all specimens of myxomycetes) were found in low-elevation localities, and among these were Arcyria helvetica, Dictydiaethalium dictyosporum, Echinostelium paucifilum, Physarum aeneum, Ph. echinosporum, Reticularia olivacea, and Stemonaria longa. From 54 species of plants used by myxomycetes as substrates, eight species provided 63% of the specimens of myxomycetes, with most samples recorded from Calophyllum inophyllum.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Flora of Madagascar, 14-21 Martin W
    MEP Candollea 66-2 COMPLET_. 03.01.12 08:50 Page397 Notes on the flora of Madagascar, 14-21 Martin W. Callmander, Peter B. Phillipson & Laurent Gautier (ed.) Abstract Résumé CALLMANDER, M. W., P. B. PHILLIPSON & L. GAUTIER (ed.) (2011). CALLMANDER, M. W., P. B. PHILLIPSON & L. GAUTIER (ed.) (2011). Notes on the flora of Madagascar, 14-21. Candollea 66: 397-423. In English, Notes sur la flore de Madagascar, 14-21. Candollea 66: 397-423. En anglais, English and French abstracts. résumés anglais et français. Ongoing research on Madagascar’s flora is revealing numer- Les recherches en cours sur la flore de Madagascar révèlent de ous taxonomic novelties and nomenclatural inconsistencies, nombreuses nouveautés taxonomiques, des problèmes de nomen- and providing new data on species distribution. This is the third clature et de nouvelles données sur la distribution des espèces. set of notes in a series that aims to provide the botanical com- Par cette série, nous souhaitons donner à la communauté bota- munity working on the flora of Madagascar an opportunity to nique internationale travaillant sur Madagascar la possibilité de publish short communications on these topics, and comprises publier de courtes contributions traitant de ces aspects. Cette troi- eight notes. sième livraison comprend huit notes. – Note 14. Lectotypification of two species of Bignoniaceae – Note 14. Lectotypification de deux espèces de Bignoniaceae from Madagascar, by Martin W. Callmander & Peter B. Phillip- de Madagascar, par Martin W. Callmander & Peter B. Phillip- son. Lectotypes are designated for two species of Bignoniaceae son. Des lectotypes sont désignés pour deux espèces de Bigno- from Madagascar, Rhodocolea boivinii (Baill.) H.
    [Show full text]