Archives of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 2018; 3: 26–30
DOI: 10.12740/APP/92165
So, who wants to be here? A survey of patients’ motives for seeking psychotherapy services and their expected un-involvement in therapy
John S. Ogrodniczuk, David Kealy, Olivier Laverdière, Anthony S. Joyce
Summary Objective: The motives that bring people to psychotherapy vary widely; while some people come on their own volition, others may not care to be in psychotherapy at all, but feel compelled to seek services because of ex- ternal pressures. A patient’s motivation for therapy is believed to influence the likelihood of becoming actively and meaningfully involved in the work of psychotherapy. Methods: We surveyed 343 consecutively admitted psychiatric outpatients from three large, urban psycho- therapy clinics about their motives (internal vs. external) for seeking psychotherapy and their expected involve- ment, or lack of involvement, in the work of therapy. Results: While most patients appear to start therapy on their own volition (76%), a significant proportion also feel compelled to seek services because of external pressures (38%). The more patients were motivated by external forces to seek treatment, the more disinclined they were to become engaged in the work of thera- py; greater endorsement of internal motives was associated with reduced unwillingness to work in therapy. Conclusions: Externally motivated patients may be particularly uncertain about the relevance and/or suc- cess of therapy and may require preparatory work to help instil in them a sense of hope and investment in the treatment process.
psychotherapy, motivation, involvement
INTRODUCTION astin chan e ay e ore i e y to occ r hen a patient fee s persona y invested – as opposed Psychotherapy can e hard or , and the pa to fee in coerced – and active y en a ed in the tient s otivation to see treat ent ay e therape tic process 1 3 e f deter ination the a critica factor in their capacity to en a e in, ory has ained considera e attention in the and profit fro , s ch or ndeed, positive and iterat re as a concept a i ation of otivation that is app ica e to psychotherapy his per John S. Ogrodniczuk1, David Kealy1, Olivier Laverdière2, Antho- spective s ests that otivation, at a asic ev ny S. Joyce3:1Department of Psychiatry, University of British Colum- e , can e c assified as a tono o s or contro ed 2 bia, Vancouver, Canada; Département de Psychologie, Université ehavio rs that are a tono o s y i e in de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada; 3Department of Psy- chiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada trinsica y otivated are e perienced as se f in Correspondence address: [email protected] itiated and persona y endorsed ontro ed i e o, ho ants to e here A s rvey of patients otives for see in psychotherapy services 2 e trinsic otivation is e perienced hen an in METHOD divid a fee s press red to en a e in a ehav io r eca se of o tside forces Participants ere recr ited fro three psychi yan and co ea es ar e that interna atric o tpatient c inics offerin psychotherapy y otivated patients sho d e ore i in and phar acotherapy in t o provinces of an to co it to the tas s of therapy and to erate ada At each c inic, a consec tive ne patients or in thro h the inherent, t necessary, over the a e of 1 , ith n ish an a e pro cha en es of the psychotherape tic endeavo r ficiency, and ho provided infor ed consent, o e research s ests that a patient s otiva ere inc ded e ection criteria for st dy par tion is re ated to the intent to p rs e therapy 6 , ticipation ere not i posed in order to have the e terna d es ratin s of patients or in ca ost c inica y representative sa p e possi e pacity , patients co a oration in therapy 8 he tota sa p e inc ded 3 3 patients nfor a and positive o tco es et e pirica investi tion a o t dia noses as not co ected Partici ations of the inf ence of patients otivations pants co p eted a rief s rvey consistin of t o on their e pected invo ve ent in the therape ite s en irin a o t their otives for see in tic process re ain scarce therapy and si ite s re ardin their e pecta he present st dy s rveyed psychiatric o t tions for non invo ve ent in therapy a e 1 patients re ardin their otives interna vs e he rief y pto nventory 18 10 as then terna for see in psychotherapy and their e sed for assess ent of enera psychiatric dis pected invo ve ent, or ac of invo ve ent, in tress and the esira i ity sca e of the Persona the or of therapy in order to he p e in ad ity esearch or 11 for assess ent of socia dressin this ap in the iterat re he st dy as desira i ity escriptive statistics ere sed to not deve oped to test specific hypotheses, t in characteri e responses to the s rvey ite s Par stead to cond ct a pre i inary s rvey that co d tia corre ations ere ca c ated et een re provide so e insi ht into the iss e of patient sponses to the otivation ite s and the non in otivations and e pectations, and set possi e vo ve ent ite s, contro in for the potentia y directions for ore for a and co prehensive confo ndin inf ence of a e, enera psychiat investi ations in the f t re ric distress and socia desira i ity
Table 1. Proportion of respondents endorsing survey items (N=343) Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree % Motivation for seeking therapy I have come for therapy because other people think that 14.6 25.1 22.7 25.7 12.0 it would be good for me. I have come for therapy because I value the way therapy 0.6 2.3 21.6 53.1 22.4 can help me make changes in my life. Expectations of un-involvement in therapy I am likely to quit therapy if things become too difficult to 25.4 40.2 16.9 11.7 5.8 do or talk about. If therapy becomes boring or tedious, I will probably quit. 17.2 40.8 25.1 14.3 2.6 I would prefer to just take medications to solve my 24.5 30.6 21.6 16.0 7.3 problems. The therapist should do most of the work in our sessions 17.5 50.1 23.0 7.3 2.0 together. I am not ready to make big changes in my life. 24.2 39.1 20.1 9.6 7.0 If therapy causes me stress, I know it is not the right 14.9 34.7 31.5 15.7 3.2 treatment for me.
Archives of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 2018; 3: 26–30 28 ohn rodnic et a
RESULTS ost of the or in therapy, 16 6 reported fee in nprepared to a e a or ife chan es, he sa p e consisted of 3 3 patients, of the aver and 18 e ieved that stress ca sed y thera a e a e 3 years 12 2 ore than ha f the py o d indicate that it is not the ri ht treat sa p e ere fe a e 8 , 6 ived a one, ent for the 33 ived ith a partner and 1 had oth a e 2 sho s the partia corre ations et een er ivin arran e ents st nder a ha f of the otives for therapy and e pectations of disen sa p e 6 ere e p oyed and 60 ere a e ent fro the or of therapy indin s ed cated eyond hi h schoo ear y t o thirds de onstrated that reater endorse ent of an e of the sa p e 62 1 had received previo s terna inf ence ehind see in treat ent as psychiatric treat ent and 22 ere previo s si nificant y associated ith a of the non in y hospita i ed for psychiatric reasons vo ve ent ite s, indicatin hi her e pectations As sho n in a e 1, three arters of not eco in invo ved in the or of thera of respondents indicated an interna otive for py et, even a on those patients ho stron see in therapy, hereas s i ht y ore than y endorsed an e terna y otivatin factor re one third 3 reported ein otivated y sponded stron y a ree , p ards of 20 had e terna forces eca se respondents can e o o e pectations of not or in in therapy see tivated y oth factors, the tota percenta e is a e 3 onverse y, reater endorse ent of hi her than 100 an interna otive for see in treat ent as si e ardin e pectations of eco in nin nificant y and ne ative y associated ith of the vo ved in therapy, 1 6 of respondents indi 6 non invo ve ent ite s, ref ectin o er e pec cated that they o d i e y it if therapy e tations of not or in in therapy A on pa ca e too diffic t, 16 o d it if thera tients ith hi h interna otivation responded py eca e orin or tedio s, 23 3 o d stron y a ree , very fe presented ith hi h prefer to st ta e edications, 3 indicat e pectations of not eco in invo ved in the ed that they tho ht the therapist sho d do or of therapy see a e 3
Table 2. Partial correlations between motivations for therapy and expectations for un-involvement in therapya I have come for therapy because I have come for therapy because I value other people think that it would be the way therapy can help me make good for me changes in my life (External motivation) (Internal motivation) I am likely to quit therapy if things 0.21*** -0.14** become too difficult to do or talk about. If therapy becomes boring or tedious, 0.11* -0.11* I will probably quit. I would prefer to just take medications to 0.11* -0.07 solve my problems. The therapist should do most of the work 0.17** -0.11* in our sessions together. I am not ready to make big changes in 0.17** -0.08 my life. If therapy causes me stress, I know it is 0.16** -0.18** not the right treatment for me.
a Controlling for age, general psychiatric distress and social desirability. * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001
Archives of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 2018; 3: 26–30 o, ho ants to e here A s rvey of patients otives for see in psychotherapy services 2
Table 3. Motivations for therapy and expectations for un-involvement in therapy Patients with high external Patients with high internal motivation motivation Disagree/strongly disagree Agree/strongly agree % % I am likely to quit therapy if things become too difficult 19.4 5.4 to do or talk about. If therapy becomes boring or tedious, I will probably 14.7 2.3 quit. I would prefer to just take medications to solve my 21.7 7.7 problems. The therapist should do most of the work in our 14.7 1.5 sessions together. I am not ready to make big changes in my life. 16.3 6.9 If therapy causes me stress, I know it is not the right 11.6 2.7 treatment for me.
Discussion co it ent to persistin ith treat ent, and A tho h otivation for therapy has on een insta i ity thro ho t the therape tic process reco ni ed as a critica factor for the s ccess of eca se they have not interna i ed a persona ac psychotherapy, re ative y fe st dies have in co nta i ity for the process of chan e itse f c vesti ated this topic ith re ard to patients cessf o tco es are ore n i e y in s ch cir e pectations for invo ve ent in treat ent c stances he findin s of the present st dy revea ed that he findin s of the present st dy sho d e the ore patients ere otivated y e terna considered in the conte t of vario s i ita forces to see treat ent, the ore disinc ined tions his inc des the se of s rvey ite s that they ere to eco e en a ed in the or of ere deve oped for the specific p rpose of the therapy ch e pected n invo ve ent in ther st dy in order to cond ct the s rvey in a feasi apy decreased ith reater endorse ent of an e anner in a sy c inica settin rather than interna otive for p rs in treat ent hese sin ore co prehensive and va idated eas findin s are consistent ith and add to those de res of the constr cts of interest his i ited rived fro the se ina or of Pe etier and co o r perspectives of the types of otivations and ea es 6 , as e as ore recent findin s de e pectations that co d have potentia y een as onstratin that intrinsica y otivated patients sessed t o d e interestin to consider differ are ore i e y to report an interna oc s of con ent types of e terna press res that patients per tro , reater se f estee and positive ood, and ceive as the so rce of otivation for treat ent ore positive e periences in therapy 8,12,13 A re ated assess ent iss e is that this st dy ad onsidered ithin the fra e or of se f de dressed patients e pectations fro a pessi is ter ination theory, for individ a s to deve op tic perspective on y hi e s ch an approach is positive e pectations a o t therape tic en a e innovative and contri tes ni e findin s to ent, they st perceive that they are e ercis the iterat re, it o d e desira e to consider in an a tono o s decision to approach treat oth opti istic and pessi istic e pectancies si ent Patients otivated y intrinsic forces taneo s y he st dy as a so i ited y an are ore i e y to invest in the assi i ation of a sence of dia nostic infor ation for the par earnin and ehavio ra chan e that can ead to ticipants, th s potentia y constrainin o r a i positive o tco es 3 onverse y, patients ho ity to c ear y enera i e o r findin s to specific ac this perspective – fee in inf enced y e pop ations or presentin iss es terna press res s ch as de ands of si nificant espite their pre i inary nat re, the re evance others – are ore i e y to e perience a iva of the findin s fro the present st dy is nota e, ence a o t co encin therapy, di inished iven the research evidence s stantiatin the
Archives of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 2018; 3: 26–30 30 ohn rodnic et a considera e inf ence that patient otivations tion, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation for therapy. Jour- and e pectations have on the s ccess of psycho nal of Personality Assessment, 68, 414–435. therapy 1 ,1 he findin s s est that patients 7. Rosenbaum, R. L., & Horowitz, M. (1983). Motivation for psy- ho are ore e terna y otivated ay e par chotherapy: A factorial and conceptual analysis. Psychother- tic ar y do tf a o t the re evance and or s c apy: Theory, Research and Practice, 20, 346–354. cess of therapy and ay re ire ore pers asion 8. Bachelor, A., Laverdière, O., Gamache, D., & Bordeleau, V. that treat ent can indeed e of enefit to the (2007). Clients’ collaboration in therapy: Self-perceptions and nce patients fee persona y invested in thera relationships with client psychological functioning, interper- py, they are ore i e y to end re so e of the sonal relations, and motivation. Psychotherapy: Theory, Re- cha en es invo ved and or constr ctive y in search, Practice, Training, 44, 175–192. treat ent to achieve a etter state of f nctionin 9. Timmer, B., Bleichhardt, G., & Rief, W. (2006). Importance of psychotherapy motivation in patients with somatization syn- REFERENCES drome. Psychotherapy Research, 16, 348–356. 10. Derogatis, L. R. (1993). Brief Symptom Inventory: Adminis- 1. Goldfried, M. R. (2012). On entering and remaining in psy- tration, scoring and procedures manual (3rd ed). Baltimore, chotherapy. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice, 19, MD: Clinical Psychometrics Research. 125–128. 11. Jackson, D. N. (1984). Personality Research Form Manual 2. Overholser, J. C. (2005). Contemporary psychotherapy: Pro- (3rd ed). London, England: Research Psychologists Press. moting personal responsibility for therapeutic change. Jour- 12. Michalak, J., Klappheck, M. A., & Kosfelder, J. (2004). Per- nal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 35, 369–376. sonal goals of psychotherapy patients: The intensity and 3. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2008). From ego-depletion to vi- the ‘why’ of goal-motivated behavior and their implications tality: Theory and findings concerning the facilitation of en- for the therapeutic process. Psychotherapy Research, 14, ergy available to the self. Social and Personality Psycholo- 193–209. gy Compass, 2, 702–717. 13. Zuroff, D. C., Koestner, R., Moskowitz, D. S., McBride, C., 4. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of Marshall, M., & Bagby, R. M. (2007). Autonomous motivation goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of for therapy: A new common factor in brief treatments for de- behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. pression. Psychotherapy Research, 17, 137–147. 5. Ryan, R. M., Lynch, M. F., Vansteenkiste, M., & Deci, E. L. 14. Constantino, M. J. (2012). Believing is seeing: An evolving (2011). Motivation and autonomy in counseling, psychother- research program on patients’ psychotherapy expectations. apy, and behavior change: A look at theory and practice. Psychotherapy Research, 22, 1–12. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 193–260. 15. Wampold, B. E. (2015). How important are the common fac- 6. Pelletier, L. G., Tuson, K. M., & Haddad, N. K. (1997). Client tors in psychotherapy? An update. World Psychiatry, 14, motivation for therapy scale: A measure of intrinsic motiva- 270–277
Archives of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 2018; 3: 26–30