Thirty Years of Law Reform 1975-2005

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Thirty Years of Law Reform 1975-2005 Thirty Years of Law Reform 1975-2005 delivered by Ronan Keane Former Chief Justice and Former President of the Law Reform Commission To Mark the Thirtieth Anniversary of the Law Reform Commission At Farmleigh House, Phoenix Park, Dublin 23 June 2005 1 Thirty Years of Law Reform 1975-2005 Introduction: of the Code Civil and Law Commissions Two years ago in a great amphitheatre in the Sorbonne the two hundredth anniversary of the Code Civil, the instrument embodying the civil law of France, was celebrated with characteristic Gallic style and elegance. The heroes of the occasion were the great jurists - led by Portalis - who were associated with the birth and development of the code, but those present were of course reminded that its creation is also forever linked with Napoleon, then the First Consul and after whom it is frequently called. He would surely have been surprised by this glowing tribute to his greatness as a law reformer paid by Lord Brougham in the House of Lords a mere thirteen years after he had been defeated at Waterloo: “You saw the greatest warrior of the age – the conqueror of Italy – the humbler of Germany – the terror of the North – account all his matchless victories poor compared with the triumph you are now in a condition to win – saw him condemn the fickleness of fortune while, in despite of her, he could pronounce his memorable boast, ‘I shall go down to posterity with the Code in my hand.’ You have vanquished him in the field; strive now to rival him in the sacred arts of peace! Outstrip him as a lawgiver, whom in arms you overcame!” This rhetorical tour de force came towards the end of an oration which even by the standards of the time must have sorely taxed its audience, lasting as it did for over six hours. That of itself was impressive testimony to the passionate commitment of Brougham to the cause of law reform. The rigidities and anomalies of the common law had given rise to the equitable jurisdiction which in turn had become as fossilised as the system which at one stage it was leavening with justice and fairness. The interventions of the legislature were sporadic. The time had come, he urged, for parliament to establish a body charged with examining the whole body of law governing Britain and Ireland and bringing forward proposals for its modernisation. This was his frequently quoted peroration: “It was the boast of Augustus... that he found Rome of brick and left it of marble... But how much nobler will be our Sovereign’s boast, when he shall have it to say that he found law dear and left it cheap; found it a sealed book and left it a living letter – found it the patrimony of the rich – left it the inheritance of the poor; found it the two edged sword of craft and oppression – left it the staff of honesty and the shield of innocence.” But for all Brougham’s eloquence, the common law world waited until the middle of the following century before establishing the independent law reform bodies which he had in mind. In the interval, of course, the problems which had exercised him had grown far more acute. The volume of precedents which constituted the common law had increased enormously and statute law consisted of a huge range of acts and instruments stretching over the centuries. Not only was the law disfigured by unjust and anomalous rules: its complexity and obscurity had grown so much that Brougham’s hope that it could be made simple, clear and easily accessible seemed a distant dream. The magnitude of the task facing such bodies, including our own, cannot be overestimated. The role of the courts and the legislature in law reform In Ireland, as elsewhere, the primary role in law reform must be played by the legislature. While the development of the common law by the courts continues to be an important feature of our law, in a modern democracy it is the role of parliament to take the lead in ensuring that our law is just and fair, that anomalies and anachronisms are eliminated and that it is available to everyone in a simple and accessible form. Judges can only decide cases which come 2 before them and, in such cases as do, are bound by the principle of the separation of powers enshrined in the Constitution not to usurp the roles of the legislature and the executive. This is not to underestimate the role played by the courts in the development of the law. The theory that judges simply pronounced what the law was and never themselves effected changes in the law has long been recognised as having no basis in reality: in cases for which the legislature had made no provision and there was no existing precedent to guide the court, judges were bound to formulate principles of law which ruled not only the case before them but other cases with similar facts. That was as much a form of law making as the enactment of a statute but as an instrument of law reform it was of its nature haphazard and lacked a democratic mandate. But it was also ultimately accepted that leaving the reform of the law to the operation of normal political processes frequently resulted in no change, in areas where there seemed no prospective dividend from the electorate, and ill-considered and incoherent changes, in areas in which the voters were seen to be interested. Thus the case for the establishment of a permanent independent body composed of experts in the law charged with keeping it under review and bringing forward proposals for its reform was eventually seen as unanswerable. The nature and functions of successful law reform bodies The experience of law reform agencies in the various common law jurisdictions where they have been in operation suggests that two elements must be present if they are to be successful. Independence First, they must be independent of the government. A body which is simply another branch of the executive will inevitably be perceived as being concerned with implementing whatever may be government policy at any particular time rather than bringing forward proposals for law reform which, viewed objectively, can be seen as being in the interest of society as a whole. That independence is facilitated in Ireland as elsewhere by giving the Commission a statutory basis and by requiring the commissioners to be appointed for a fixed term. That independence is not, however, absolute: the Commission is not left entirely free to decide what subjects it will tackle. I shall return to that topic shortly, but in general it has to be recognised that even a statutory body such as the Law Reform Commission may have its existence terminated by the legislature which brought it into being. Moreover, a government which is sceptical as to the value of a law reform agency may leave it to perish from lack of support as indeed seemed likely to happen at an early stage in the history of the Irish Commission when the government of the day simply left vacancies in the position of commissioners unfilled. Ultimately, there was an acceptance of the need for a body such as the Commission and there seems no serious support now for the view which some ministers apparently had at one stage that it is an expensive and irrelevant luxury. Reform proposals that are relevant to society’s needs The second precondition for a successful law reform agency is that the body must bring forward proposals for changes in the law which have a reasonable prospect of making our laws fair, relevant to society’s needs, easily understood and accessible to everyone. At one time, the view was frequently expressed that law reform agencies should confine themselves to what is sometimes referred to as “lawyers’ law,” by which was meant the elimination by statute of absurdities and anomalies in the law the removal of which would create no controversy. Advocates of that view also urged that the agencies should avoid becoming engaged in areas of policy since that would inevitably involve the making of what might be called in a broad sense political judgements which, it was said, should be left to the executive and the legislature. 3 Law reform in a changing society I think that most people who have worked in the law reform area would agree that this is an unduly narrow view of the proper functions of such bodies. Laws to be fair and relevant must take account of changes in society and advances in human knowledge and understanding in various areas. Experience suggests that leaving the necessary alterations to the vicissitudes of the political process is not a sensible option: governments are inevitably preoccupied for much of the time with responding to the pressure of events and law reform bodies can perform a vital function in drawing the attention of both politicians and the public to changes in the law which are plainly desirable but which for a variety of reasons are unlikely to figure prominently in the election manifestoes of the political parties. Clearly there are areas of intense social controversy in which it would not be appropriate for the Commission to become involved: thus, while family law has been one of the areas in which the Commission has always been particularly active, it was obviously no part of its function in the era before the Constitution was amended to make any proposals for or against the introduction of divorce. It can indeed be said that the Commission has not, in general, seen the advocacy of constitutional change as within its remit, although it has of necessity drawn attention to any constitutional inhibitions which may affect otherwise desirable proposals.
Recommended publications
  • The Curragh Mutiny in Context Friday 21 March 2014
    The Curragh Mutiny in Context Friday 21 March 2014 Watertower Curragh Camp circa 1910 Ceannt Barracks Officers Mess, Curragh Camp Sir Richard Aikens (Court of Appeal of England and Wales), Professor Thomas Bartlett (University of Aberdeen), Professor Ian Beckett (University of Kent), Barry Bowman (Bowman & Co., Solicitors), Dr Timothy Bowman (University of Kent), Dr Anne Dolan (Trinity College Dublin), Professor Ronan Fanning (University College Dublin), Professor Keith Jeffery (Queens University Belfast), Mr Justice Ronan Keane (Chief Justice of Ireland, 2000-2004), Professor Eoin O’Dell (Trinity College Dublin), Mr Justice Donal O’Donnell (Supreme Court of Ireland); Professor Eunan O’Halpin (Trinity College Dublin), Mark Seaman (Historian, Cabinet Office), and Roger Sweetman SC. A Centre for Contemporary Irish History 1912-1923 Commemorative Initiative DRAFT PROGRAMME 9.30: Conference Opening 9.45-11.00 Crisis in the making (Chair: Dr Anne Dolan) Eunan O’Halpin Dublin Castle and the Curragh Crisis Tom Bartlett The Army and Ireland since 1801 Ronan Fanning The Government and Ireland, 1911-14 11.00-11.15 Coffee 11.15 – 12.30 Events and Outcomes (Chair: Mark Seaman) Ian Beckett Armed Services, Government and Crown in 1914 Tim Bowman Ulster Unionists and the Army Keith Jeffery Sir Henry Wilson and the defence of Ulster 12.30- 1.15 Lunch 1.15 – 2.15 Visit to the Curragh Camp Museum 2.15-3.15 Legal and Constitutional Issues (Sir Richard Aikens, Mr Justice Ronan Keane and Mr Justice Donal O’Donnell presiding) Barry Bowman The framework of military law in 1914 Eoin O’Dell Was there a mutiny or any other breach of the law- 1 Roger Sweetman Was there a mutiny or any other breach of the law- 2 3.15-3.30 Coffee 3.30-5.00 Judges’ views; general discussion 5.00 Conference Closes 5-6.30 Reception .
    [Show full text]
  • Reconciling Ireland's Bail Laws with Traditional Irish Constitutional Values
    Reconciling Ireland's Bail Laws with Traditional Irish Constitutional Values Kate Doran Thesis Offered for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Law Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences University of Limerick Supervisor: Prof. Paul McCutcheon Submitted to the University of Limerick, November 2014 Abstract Title: Reconciling Ireland’s Bail Laws with Traditional Irish Constitutional Values Author: Kate Doran Bail is a device which provides for the pre-trial release of a criminal defendant after security has been taken for the defendant’s future appearance at trial. Ireland has traditionally adopted a liberal approach to bail. For example, in The People (Attorney General) v O’Callaghan (1966), the Supreme Court declared that the sole purpose of bail was to secure the attendance of the accused at trial and that the refusal of bail on preventative detention grounds amounted to a denial of the presumption of innocence. Accordingly, it would be unconstitutional to deny bail to an accused person as a means of preventing him from committing further offences while awaiting trial. This purist approach to the right to bail came under severe pressure in the mid-1990s from police, prosecutorial and political forces which, in turn, was a response to a media generated panic over the perceived increase over the threat posed by organised crime and an associated growth in ‘bail banditry’. A constitutional amendment effectively neutralising the effects of the O'Callaghan jurisprudence was adopted in 1996. This was swiftly followed by the Bail Act 1997 which introduced the concept of preventative detention (in the bail context) into Irish law.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Libraries Are Amongst the Top Value for Money Public Services
    Issued by An Chomhairle Leabharlanna (The Library Council) No. 239 April 2004 ISSN 0332-0049 PUBLIC LIBRARIES ARE AMONGST THE TOP VALUE FOR MONEY PUBLIC SERVICES A national survey of public library users, lapsed users and non- people who have not used the library in recent years are not users reveals that over two-thirds of the adult population are, fully aware of the various services on offer. For example, only or have been, members of a public library – of these, 36% 50% knew that Internet access is provided; even fewer knew indicated that they had visited the library recently and 94% of that talking books could be borrowed, while only 15% knew them considered their last visit to have been ‘a success’. that they could get such things as motor tax and passport The results were published by An Chomhairle Leabharlanna application forms at the library. Reading groups and reading on 24th March and are based on TNS mrbi’s omnibus service, promotions are among the most popular activities organised PhoneBus. by public libraries and the 62% of non-users who didn’t know about them are certainly missing out. These findings suggest The report, A public space for all: use and non-use of public that more needs to be done to let the public know what kind of libraries, was launched in the newly refurbished Dublin City services the modern public library provides. Library and Archive in Pearse Street by the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Mr. Martin The main reason people gave for not visiting a library was “no Cullen T.D.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Dublin Department of History
    University of Dublin Department of History Trinity College School of Histories and Humanities Dublin 2 Tel: +353 1 896 1020 / 896 1791 Fax: +353 1 896 3995 Web: http://www.tcd.ie/History/ The Curragh Mutiny in Context Friday 21 March 2014 Watertower Curragh Camp circa 1910 Ceannt Barracks Officers Mess, Curragh Camp Sir Richard Aikens (Court of Appeal of England and Wales), Professor Thomas Bartlett (University of Aberdeen), Professor Ian Beckett (University of Kent), Barry Bowman (Bowman & Co., Solicitors), Dr Timothy Bowman (University of Kent), Dr Anne Dolan (Trinity College Dublin), Professor Ronan Fanning (University College Dublin), Professor Keith Jeffery (Queens University Belfast), Mr Justice Ronan Keane (Chief Justice of Ireland, 2000-2004), Professor Eoin O’Dell (Trinity College Dublin), Mr Justice Donal O’Donnell (Supreme Court of Ireland); Professor Eunan O’Halpin (Trinity College Dublin), Mark Seaman (Historian, Cabinet Office), and Roger Sweetman SC. ________________________________________________________________________ SCHOOL OF HISTORIES AND HUMANITIES Classics History History of Art Gender and Women’s Studies DRAFT PROGRAMME 9.30: Conference Opening 9.45-11.00 Crisis in the making (Chair: Dr Anne Dolan) Eunan O’Halpin Dublin Castle and the Curragh Crisis Tom Bartlett The Army and Ireland since 1801 Ronan Fanning The Government and Ireland, 1911-14 11.00-11.15 Coffee 11.15 – 12.30 Events and Outcomes (Chair: Mark Seaman) Ian Beckett Armed Services, Government and Crown in 1914 Tim Bowman Ulster Unionists and the Army
    [Show full text]
  • R I2009 2010
    cover to print_Layout 1 10/12/2010 11:04 Page 1 ANNUAL REVIEW rANNUAL i 20092010 2009 Future paths / 2010 Nicholas Canny reflects on the Academy’s evolving role Innovation Ireland Tom Brazil assesses the Report of the Innovation Taskforce Eurosciences Biennale Open Forum R O Peter Mitchell looks to opportunities ahead as Dublin YAL becomes European City of Science in 2012 IRISH Quote/unquote Michael Cronin argues for critical thinking A vision for astronomy and ACADEMY astrophysics in Ireland David Fegan traces the journey of the cosmos from the ‘Big Bang’ On the shelf 9-volume Dictionary of Irish Biography ACADAMH R ÍOG A N A H É IREA NN RIA RIA ROYAL IRISH ACADEMY • ACADAMH RÍOGA NA HÉIREANN RIA cover to print_Layout 1 10/12/2010 11:04 Page 2 ContentS } Key Achievements 2009–10 p2 } President’s Report—Future paths: on the Academy’s evolving role p4 } Secretary’s Report—Innovation Ireland: the Report of the Innovation Taskforce p8 } Science Secretary’s Report—Eurosciences Biennale Open Forum—Dublin’s opportunity p11 } PL&A Secretary’s Report—Quote/unquote—on critical thinking p16 } Senior Vice-President’s Report—A vision for astronomy and astrophysics in Ireland p20 } New Members p24 } Distinctions conferred on Members p31 } Bereavements p32 } Academy Committees Report p38 } Competitive measures—on Craig Barrett’s Academy address p42 } ‘The Future Role of the University in a Changing World’ p45 } A Year in View p47 } Research Projects p54 } Art and Architecture of Ireland (AAI) p54 } Dictionary of Irish Biography (DIB) p56 } Dictionary
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN HONORARY CONFERRING Bloomsday, 16 June 2014
    UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN HONORARY CONFERRING Bloomsday, 16 June 2014 TEXT OF THE INTRODUCTORY ADDRESS DELIVERED BY MR. PAUL GALLAGHER, SC on 16 June 2014, on the occasion of the conferring of the Degree of Doctor of Laws, honoris causa, on Susan Denham President, Honoured Guests, Ladies and Gentlemen. Born in 1945, a native of Dublin, Susan Denham graduated from Dublin University with an LLB in 1970 and graduated from the King’s Inns with a Barrister at Law Degree in 1971 and from the Law School of Columbia University with an LLM Degree in 1972. Susan Denham commenced practice as a barrister in 1973, she became a Senior Counsel in 1987 and was appointed a Judge of the High Court in 1991. In 1992 she became the first woman appointed to the Supreme Court and on 25th July 2011 became the first woman to be appointed as Chief Justice of Ireland. She served as Pro- Chancellor of Dublin University from 1996 - 2010. As a lawyer, judge, and educator, she has provided selfless and highly committed public service in a lifetime of great achievement. She has brought to all of these roles her qualities of integrity, judgment and courtesy which have greatly enhanced her work. Susan Denham’s lifelong dedication to the administration of justice has through a singular focus of intellect, judgment and vision yielded great benefit for us all. Her dedication accrues not just to the advantage of those who engage with the legal system but to all those who participate in the democratic system. The proper and successful functioning of the legal system is vitally dependent on an independent judiciary with the necessary expertise, integrity and resources to discharge the crucial role conferred on it by the Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Rights News 4 Autumn 2007
    ICCL4 Autumn07 f 12/09/2007 12:01 Page 1 Autumn 2007 The Wedding Issue: Why Are We Still Waiting for Equality for All Families? SPECIAL FEATURES: JUSTICE MATTERS Ronan Keane Reviews Independence, Accountability and the Irish Judiciary VICTIMS DESERVE MORE Writes Thomas Hammerberg, Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights ICCL4 Autumn07 f 12/09/2007 12:01 Page 2 • Run campaigns to raise public and political awareness About the ICCL of human rights, justice and equality issues. Equality The Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL) is Ireland’s leading • Work closely with other key stakeholders in the human independent human rights watchdog, which monitors, educates rights, justice and equality sectors. The Wedding Issue: Still Waiting for Equality and campaigns in order to secure full enjoyment of human The ICCL will be bringing its campaign for sex – or their sex lives – determine whether on opposite sex marriage enjoy the rights for everyone. Equality for All Families to the Electric Picnic, or not they can? protection of the Irish Constitution. This Ireland’s boutique music festival, from 31 means that many families are denied That would be NO, NO and NO, as far as the Founded in 1976 by Mary Robinson and others, the ICCL has August to 2 September 2007 in Stradbally protection under Irish law. Many cohabiting ICCL is concerned. played a leading role in some of the most successful human How you can help Hall, Stradbally, Co. Laois. couples and diverse families want to share rights campaigns in Ireland. These have included establishing You can help us to continue our work to monitor, train, conduct property, income, home life and to care and This is our first outing to the Electric Picnic an independent Garda Ombudsman Commission, legalising the research, campaign and lobby for changes in legislation to be cared for, yet they do not have the same and … we have a few questions: right to divorce, securing more effective protection of children’s ensure our rights are protected and promoted.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2001 Tuarascáil Bhliantúil Mission Statement
    Annual Report 2001 Tuarascáil Bhliantúil Mission Statement: To manage the courts, support the judiciary and provide a high quality and professional service to all users of the courts An tSeirbhís Chúirteanna Contents Message from the Chief Justice 03 Foreword by the Chairperson of the Board 04 Introduction by the Chief Executive Officer 08 Chapter 1 - Structures and Environment 12 Chapter 2 - Implementing our Mandates 24 Chapter 3 - Court Statistics 56 Chapter 4 - Our Staff 104 Reports of the Rules Committees 108 Financial Statements 112 Appendices I - Freedom of Information Act, 1997 121 II - Changes in District Court Areas and Districts 122 III - Circuit Court Statistics: Countrywide 125 IV - Circuit Court Statistics: Family law 127 V - Circuit Court:Average waiting times 129 VI - District Court:Average waiting times 131 Publications 132 Glossary of terms 133 Additional information 134 1 ANNUAL REPORT 2001 THE COURTS SERVICE 2 ANNUAL REPORT 2001 An tSeirbhís Chúirteanna Message from the Chief Justice I am pleased to welcome you to I am confident that you will find in this the second Annual Report of the Report strong evidence of the continuing Courts Service.This Report commitment and energy of the staff and Board of the Service in going about the work charts another progressive and of creating an efficient and exemplary Courts successful year for the Service. Service. I am proud of the success of the It continues in the vein of last Service in the short period since its year’s Report by providing establishment and I look forward to a detailed descriptions, insights continuation of this momentum in the coming and statistics about our courts year.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Bar Review Volume 21
    TITLE THE BAR Volume 21 Number 6 RJournal of TEhe Bar of IVreland IEW December 2016 Court of Appeal rules on repossessions Publish ing O ctober –Decem ber 2 016 Law of C ompanies , Intellec tual P rop er ty Keane on 4th edition Law in I reland Compan y L aw Thomas B . C our tne y Rober t C lark , S hane Sm yth, Brian G Hut chinson BloomNiamsh Hball ury P rofessional The C ompanies A ct 2014 makes the Keane on C ompan y La w, F if th E dition most far -r eaching and fundamen tal A detailed guide t o pa ten ts , c op yr igh t (pr evious edition: C ompan y La w changes t o I rish c ompan y la w in t wo and tr ademar k la w. I t c overs all r elev an t by Justic e R onan Keane) c overs the gener ations , putting f or war d a r adically Eur opean leg isla tion and tr ac es its Companies A ct 2014 and is essen tial di er en t appr oach wher eb y the pr iv ate wea ving in to I rish la w. I t details E ur opean reading f or studen ts , solicit ors and compan y limit ed b y shar es will bec ome case la w t ogether with r elev an t case la w bar rist ers alike . A ll the changes t o I rish the new model c ompan y.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2002
    Annual Report 2002 Tuarascáil Bhliantúil Mission Statement: TO MANAGE THE COURTS, SUPPORT THE JUDICIARY AND PROVIDE A HIGH QUALITY AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICE TO ALL USERS OF THE COURTS The Courts Service | Annual Report 2002 1 Contents Message from the Chief Justice 03 Foreword by the Chairperson of the Board 05 Introduction by the Chief Executive Officer 09 Chapter 1 - Structures and Environment 13 Chapter 2 - Implementing our Mandates 27 Chapter 3 - Court Statistics 63 Chapter 4 - Our Staff 115 Reports of the Rules Committees 119 Financial Statements 123 Glossary of Terms 132 Additional information 134 Appendices 135 I - Circuit Court Statistics: Countrywide 136 II - Circuit Court Statistics: Family Law 137 III - Circuit Court: Average waiting times 138 IV - District Court: Average waiting times 139 The Courts Service | Annual Report 2002 3 Welcome from the Chief Justice It is a pleasure for me to welcome you to the third Annual Report of the Courts Service. These reports increasingly give us an insight into the remarkable modernisation of, and structural enhancement to, the courts’ administrative system which we have seen in recent years. 4 An tSeirbhís Chúirteanna | Tuarascáil Bhliantúil 2002 Welcome from the Chief Justice They also allow the reader explore and absorb a myriad of facts and statistics about our courts – information which is valuable to the citizen in appreciating the role of the third branch of Government. The actual number of matters dealt with at every level of the courts is still an astonishing revelation even in this, the third such Report. It is not only the volume that is noteworthy, but also the widespread nature of the work across every area of law and covering every facet of civic, commercial, community and criminal activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Da´Il E´Ireann
    Vol. 632 Thursday, No. 2 22 February 2007 DI´OSPO´ IREACHTAI´ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DA´ IL E´ IREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIU´ IL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Thursday, 22 February 2007. Requests to Move Adjournment of Da´il under Standing Order 31 ……………… 321 Order of Business ……………………………… 322 Visit of Ivory Coast Delegation ………………………… 341 Order of Business (resumed) …………………………… 341 Diseases of Animals Regulations: Referral to Joint Committee ……………… 344 Presentation of Estimates: Motion ………………………… 345 Health Bill 2006: Second Stage (resumed) …………………………… 345 Referral to Select Committee ………………………… 375 Message from Seanad ……………………………… 376 Message from Select Committee ………………………… 376 European Communities Bill 2006 [Seanad]: Second Stage (resumed) …………………………… 377 Referral to Select Committee ………………………… 394 Broadcasting (Amendment) Bill 2006 [Seanad]: Second Stage ……………………………… 395 Referral to Select Committee ………………………… 429 Ceisteanna — Questions Priority Questions …………………………… 429 Other Questions …………………………… 444 Private Notice Questions ………………………… 446 Adjournment Debate Matters …………………………… 455 Adjournment Debate Post Office Network …………………………… 456 Languages Programme …………………………… 460 Social and Affordable Housing ………………………… 464 Questions: Written Answers …………………………… 469 321 322 DA´ IL E´ IREANN that they have now sought to give the impression that the 750,000 tonne incinerator is not going ———— ahead—— De´ardaoin, 22 Feabhra 2007. Mr. McCormack: Before the general election. Thursday, 22 February 2007. Mr. Gormley: ——despite the fact Dublin City ———— Council has stated it is still on track; and the need for both Ministers to explain why the Govern- Chuaigh an Leas-Cheann Comhairle i gceannas ment voted down a Green Party motion and Bill ar 10.30 a.m. which would have stopped the incinerator. ———— Deputies: Hear, hear. Paidir. An Leas-Cheann Comhairle: Having con- Prayer. sidered the matters raised, I have found that they are not in order under Standing Order 31.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish-Soviet Diplomatic and Friendship Relations, 1919-80
    Irish-Soviet diplomatic and friendship relations, 1919-80 by Michael Joseph Quinn THESIS FOR THE DEGREE OF PhD DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND MAYNOOTH Head of Department: Professor Marian Lyons SUPERVISOR OF RESEARCH: Professor Jacqueline Hill January 2014 i Table of contents Abstract iii Declaration iv Acknowledgments v List of abbreviations vi Introduction 1 Chapter one: Irish-Soviet diplomatic affairs, 1919-72 15 Chapter two: The establishment and practice of Irish-Soviet diplomatic relations, 1971-80 60 Chapter three: An account of Irish-Soviet friendship organisations, with a principal focus on the Ireland-U.S.S.R. Society, founded in 1966 122 Chapter four: Ambassador Brennan’s island of Ireland political reports 177 from Moscow to the Department of Foreign Affairs, Dublin, 1974-80 Chapter five: Irish-Soviet relations in the context of European Political Cooperation, 1974-80 226 Conclusion 270 Appendix 1: A register of Ambassador Brennan’s political reports 282 (P.R.s) from Moscow to the Department of Foreign Affairs, Dublin, 1974-80 Appendix 2: A register of the records of Irish involvement in the Eastern Europe Working Group (E.E.W.G.), 1974-80. 312 Bibliography 326 ii Abstract This thesis offers a contribution to Irish historiography with a study of Ireland’s diplomatic and friendship relations with the Soviet Union in the ‘short Soviet twentieth- century’. To date no such study has been produced. The study has as its central focus developments surrounding the establishment of formal diplomatic relations between the two states in 1973, and considers aspects of how those relations evolved down to 1980.
    [Show full text]