DOCSLIB.ORG

Pumping Scheme. Environment Protection And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pumping Scheme. Environment Protection And Coorong South Lagoon Salinity Reduction Strategy: Pumping Scheme Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999- Referral 1 Document Control Version Date Comment Action Officer V.34 19/04/09 Final edits Glynn Ricketts V.35 to 28/5/10 Final review Tiana Nairn 2 Contents 1. Summary of proposed action..............................................................................................................................5 1.1 Short Description........................................................................................................................ 5 1.2 Latitude and Longitude............................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Locality....................................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Size of the Development Footprint or Work Area....................................................................... 6 1.5 Street Address of the Site .......................................................................................................... 6 1.6 Lot Description ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.7 Local Description Area and Council Contact.............................................................................. 6 1.8 Timeframe .................................................................................................................................. 6 1.9 Alternatives ................................................................................................................................ 6 1.10 State Assessment .................................................................................................................... 7 1.11 Component of Larger Action .................................................................................................... 7 1.12 Related Actions or Proposals................................................................................................... 7 1.13 Australian Government Funding .............................................................................................. 7 2. Detailed description of proposed action .............................................................................................................8 2.1 Description of proposed action................................................................................................... 8 2.1.1 Impetus for the Proposed Action ........................................................................................ 8 2.1.2 Objectives of the Proposed Action ..................................................................................... 8 2.1.3 Elements of the Proposed Action ....................................................................................... 9 2.2 Alternative Locations, Time Frames or Activities that form part of the Referred Action........... 11 2.2.1 Do Nothing Scenario ........................................................................................................ 11 2.2.2 Pumping and/or excavation scenarios............................................................................. 11 2.2.3 Fresh Water Inputs from the River Murray ....................................................................... 14 2.2.4 Fresh Water Inputs from Redirection of Water from the South East Drainage Network... 14 2.2.5 Pumping Seawater in and Hypersaline Water out............................................................ 14 2.2.6 A Proposal to use the Difference in Water Level between the Coorong and Sea ............ 14 2.2.7 Alternative Project Locations............................................................................................ 15 2.2.8 Alternative Decommissioning Scenarios .......................................................................... 15 2.3 Context, Planning Framework and State/local Government Requirements............................. 15 2.4 Environmental Impact Assessments under Commonwealth, State or Territory Legislation..... 18 2.5 Consultation with Indigenous Stakeholders ............................................................................. 18 2.6 A Staged Development or Component of a Larger Project...................................................... 18 3. Matters of National Environmental Significance...............................................................................................19 3.1 World Heritage Properties........................................................................................................ 19 3.2 National Heritage Places.......................................................................................................... 19 3.3 Nuclear Actions ........................................................................................................................ 19 3.4 Wetlands of International Importance (Declared Ramsar Wetlands) ....................................... 19 3.4.1 Coorong and Lakes Alexandrina and Albert Ramsar site................................................. 20 3.4.2 Species that Contribute to the Ramsar Status of the site................................................. 21 3.5 EPBC-listed Species and Ecological Communities.................................................................. 29 3.5.1 EPBC-listed Threatened Species ..................................................................................... 29 3.5.2 EPBC-listed Migratory Species ........................................................................................ 31 3.5.3 Likelihood of Occurrence of EPBC-listed Plant Species .................................................. 33 3.5.4 Likelihood of Occurrence of Faunal EPBC-listed Threatened and Migratory Species ..... 37 3.5.5 Threatened Ecological Communities................................................................................ 57 3.6 Commonwealth Areas.............................................................................................................. 58 4. Nature and Extent of Likely Impacts.................................................................................................................59 4.1 World Heritage Properties........................................................................................................ 59 4.2 National Heritage Places.......................................................................................................... 59 4.3 Species that Contribute to the Ramsar Status of the Site........................................................ 59 4.3.1 Plant Species.................................................................................................................... 60 4.3.2 Amphibian Species........................................................................................................... 61 4.3.3 Fish Species..................................................................................................................... 61 4.3.4 Bird Species ..................................................................................................................... 64 4.4 EPBC-listed Threatened Species............................................................................................. 75 3 4.5 EPBC-listed Migratory Species ................................................................................................ 87 4.6 EPBC-listed Threatened Ecological Communities ................................................................... 93 4.7 Commonwealth Marine Area.................................................................................................... 94 5. Other Important Features of the Environment..................................................................................................95 5.1 Soil and Vegetation Characteristics ......................................................................................... 95 5.2 Water Flows, including Rivers, Creeks and Impoundments..................................................... 96 5.3 Outstanding Natural Features, including Caves....................................................................... 99 5.4 Gradient (or depth range if action to be taken in a marine area) ............................................. 99 5.5 Buildings or other Infrastructure ............................................................................................... 99 5.6 Marine Areas............................................................................................................................ 99 5.7 Kinds of Fauna and Flora......................................................................................................... 99 5.8 Current State of the Environment in the Area ........................................................................ 100 5.9 Other Important or Unique Values of the Environment .......................................................... 100 5.10 Tenure of the Project Area ................................................................................................... 101 5.11 Existing Land/Marine Uses of Project Area.......................................................................... 101 5.12 Any Proposed Land/Marine Uses of Project Area................................................................ 101 6. Measures to Avoid or Reduce Impacts on Matters of NES........................................................................... 102 7. Environmental
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Western Australian Bird Notes 85: 8
    WesternWestern AustralianAustralian BirdBird NotesNotes Quarterly Newsletter of Birds Australia Western Australia Inc CONSERVATION THROUGH KNOWLEDGE (a division of Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union) No 117 March 2006 ISSN 1445-3983 C on t e n t s Observations ........................................ p6 Notices.................................................p20 Coming Events ....................................p27 BAWA Reports...................................... p8 New Members......................................p22 Crossword Answers ...........................p31 BAWA Projects................................... p10 Country Groups ..................................p23 Opportunities for Volunteers .............p32 Members’ Contributions.................... p14 Excursion Reports..............................p23 Calendar of Events..............................p32 Crossword........................................... p19 Observatories......................................p26 SOOTY OYSTERCATCHER SITES IN SOUTH WESTERN AUSTRALIA For more than ten years now, members from Birds Australia rocky coastline. Sites where Sooty Oystercatcher sightings WA have been involved in Hooded Plover surveys. During have been recorded are shown in Table 1. this time, much information has been gained on Hooded Plovers, but other data have also been gathered. Coastal distribution of Sooty Oystercatchers from Perth to Eyre Observers were asked to complete a survey sheet and record sightings of other wader species. Consequently, in addition to Perth Hooded
    [Show full text]
  • Pyura Doppelgangera to Support Regional Response Decisions
    REPORT NO. 2480 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE SEA SQUIRT PYURA DOPPELGANGERA TO SUPPORT REGIONAL RESPONSE DECISIONS CAWTHRON INSTITUTE | REPORT NO. 2480 JUNE 2014 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE SEA SQUIRT PYURA DOPPELGANGERA TO SUPPORT REGIONAL RESPONSE DECISIONS LAUREN FLETCHER Prepared for Marlborough District Council CAWTHRON INSTITUTE 98 Halifax Street East, Nelson 7010 | Private Bag 2, Nelson 7042 | New Zealand Ph. +64 3 548 2319 | Fax. +64 3 546 9464 www.cawthron.org.nz REVIEWED BY: APPROVED FOR RELEASE BY: Javier Atalah Chris Cornelisen ISSUE DATE: 3 June 2014 RECOMMENDED CITATION: Fletcher LM 2014. Background information on the sea squirt, Pyura doppelgangera to support regional response decisions. Prepared for Marlborough District Council. Cawthron Report No. 2480. 30 p. © COPYRIGHT: Cawthron Institute. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part without further permission of the Cawthron Institute, provided that the author and Cawthron Institute are properly acknowledged. CAWTHRON INSTITUTE | REPORT NO. 2480 JUNE 2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The non-indigenous solitary sea squirt, Pyura doppelgangera (herein Pyura), was first detected in New Zealand in 2007 after a large population was found in the very north of the North Island. A delimitation survey by the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) during October 2009 found established populations at 21 locations within the region. It is not known how long Pyura has been present in New Zealand, although it is not believed to be a recent introduction. Pyura is an aggressive interspecific competitor for primary space. As such, this species may negatively impact native green-lipped mussel beds present, with associated impacts to key social and cultural values.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 1 General Introduction 1.1 Shorebirds in Australia Shorebirds
    CHAPTER 1 General introduction 1.1 Shorebirds in Australia Shorebirds, sometimes referred to as waders, are birds that rely on coastal beaches, shorelines, estuaries and mudflats, or inland lakes, lagoons and the like for part of, and in some cases all of, their daily and annual requirements, i.e. food and shelter, breeding habitat. They are of the suborder Charadrii and include the curlews, snipe, plovers, sandpipers, stilts, oystercatchers and a number of other species, making up a diverse group of birds. Within Australia, shorebirds account for 10% of all bird species (Lane 1987) and in New South Wales (NSW), this figure increases marginally to 11% (Smith 1991). Of these shorebirds, 45% rely exclusively on coastal habitat (Smith 1991). The majority, however, are either migratory or vagrant species, leaving only five resident species that will permanently inhabit coastal shorelines/beaches within Australia. Australian resident shorebirds include the Beach Stone-curlew (Esacus neglectus), Hooded Plover (Charadrius rubricollis), Red- capped Plover (Charadrius ruficapillus), Australian Pied Oystercatcher (Haematopus longirostris) and Sooty Oystercatcher (Haematopus fuliginosus) (Smith 1991, Priest et al. 2002). These species are generally classified as ‘beach-nesting’, nesting on sandy ocean beaches, sand spits and sand islands within estuaries. However, the Sooty Oystercatcher is an island-nesting species, using rocky shores of near- and offshore islands rather than sandy beaches. The plovers may also nest by inland salt lakes. Shorebirds around the globe have become increasingly threatened with the pressure of predation, competition, human encroachment and disturbance and global warming. Populations of birds breeding in coastal areas which also support a burgeoning human population are under the highest threat.
    [Show full text]
  • Towra Point Nature Reserve Ramsar Site: Ecological Character Description in Good Faith, Exercising All Due Care and Attention
    Towra Point Nature Reserve Ramsar site Ecological character description Disclaimer The Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW (DECCW) has compiled the Towra Point Nature Reserve Ramsar site: Ecological character description in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. DECCW does not accept responsibility for any inaccurate or incomplete information supplied by third parties. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. Readers should seek appropriate advice about the suitability of the information to their needs. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or of the Minister for Environment Protection, Heritage and the Arts. Acknowledgements Phil Straw, Australasian Wader Studies Group; Bob Creese, Bruce Pease, Trudy Walford and Rob Williams, Department of Primary Industries (NSW); Simon Annabel and Rob Lea, NSW Maritime; Geoff Doret, Ian Drinnan and Brendan Graham, Sutherland Shire Council; John Dahlenburg, Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority. Symbols for conceptual diagrams are courtesy of the Integration and Application Network (ian.umces.edu/symbols), University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science. This publication has been prepared with funding provided by the Australian Government to the Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority through the Coastal Catchments Initiative Program. © State of NSW, Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW, and Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority DECCW and SMCMA are pleased to allow the reproduction of material from this publication on the condition that the source, publisher and authorship are appropriately acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices Appendices
    APPENDICES APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 – PUBLICATIONS SCIENTIFIC PAPERS Aidoo EN, Ute Mueller U, Hyndes GA, and Ryan Braccini M. 2015. Is a global quantitative KL. 2016. The effects of measurement uncertainty assessment of shark populations warranted? on spatial characterisation of recreational fishing Fisheries, 40: 492–501. catch rates. Fisheries Research 181: 1–13. Braccini M. 2016. Experts have different Andrews KR, Williams AJ, Fernandez-Silva I, perceptions of the management and conservation Newman SJ, Copus JM, Wakefield CB, Randall JE, status of sharks. Annals of Marine Biology and and Bowen BW. 2016. Phylogeny of deepwater Research 3: 1012. snappers (Genus Etelis) reveals a cryptic species pair in the Indo-Pacific and Pleistocene invasion of Braccini M, Aires-da-Silva A, and Taylor I. 2016. the Atlantic. Molecular Phylogenetics and Incorporating movement in the modelling of shark Evolution 100: 361-371. and ray population dynamics: approaches and management implications. Reviews in Fish Biology Bellchambers LM, Gaughan D, Wise B, Jackson G, and Fisheries 26: 13–24. and Fletcher WJ. 2016. Adopting Marine Stewardship Council certification of Western Caputi N, de Lestang S, Reid C, Hesp A, and How J. Australian fisheries at a jurisdictional level: the 2015. Maximum economic yield of the western benefits and challenges. Fisheries Research 183: rock lobster fishery of Western Australia after 609-616. moving from effort to quota control. Marine Policy, 51: 452-464. Bellchambers LM, Fisher EA, Harry AV, and Travaille KL. 2016. Identifying potential risks for Charles A, Westlund L, Bartley DM, Fletcher WJ, Marine Stewardship Council assessment and Garcia S, Govan H, and Sanders J.
    [Show full text]
  • (Aves: Charadriiformes) by of Ornithology, Previously the Chaotic Ostralegus Longi
    Multivariate assessment of the phenetic affinities of Australasian oystercatchers (Aves: Charadriiformes) by Allan J. Baker Department of Ornithology, Royal Ontario Museum, and Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Abstract tion in morphological characters (Baker, 1975). The Australian taxa have suffered similar treat- Phenetic affinities of Australasian oystercatchers were eluci- dated multivariate statistical of seven The first by analysis morpho- ment, as illustrated below. oystercatcher metric characters taken from skins. Nineteen museum opera- to receive formal recognition was a pied bird, tional taxonomie units (OTUs), representing all the currently described Vieillot as and most of the subordinate by (1817) Haematopus longi- recognized species taxa, were used to calibrate morphological variation in Australasian rostris. Three further pied birds from northwestern the by the Haematopus against range displayed Haematopo- South Australia, New Wales and Queensland were didae. The rather of variation homogeneous nature among H. described respectively as picatus King, 1826, OTUs was not well suited for analysis by hierarchical but ordination method H. australianus H. clustering methods, a non-hierarchical Gould, 1838 and longirostris utilizing both principal components and nonmetric scaling Mathews mattingleyi Mathews, 1912. (1912) syn- produced excellent summaries of the similarity matrices. onymized H. australianus with the nominate H. The South Island Pied Oystercatcher (H. o. finschi) of New Zealand clustered tightly with the Eurasian H. ostra- l. longirostris, and restricted picatus as a sub- and thus be of Palaearctic All the legus seems to origin. of H. The he species longirostris. following year remaining Australasian taxa grouped in another cluster with these taxa under H. the New World and it that the submerged ostralegus longi- forms, appears likely Australian Pied Oystercatcher will have to be split from the rostris Vieillot, ostensibly because of the paucity Comments the ostralegus group as a separate species.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Conservation of Australia's Shorebirds
    Ecology and Conservation of Australia’s Shorebirds Robert Scott Clemens B.S. Wildlife Biology M.S. Natural Resources A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2016 School of Biological Sciences 1 Abstract Global biodiversity continues to decline rapidly, and addressing this situation requires an understanding of both the problems and the solutions. This understanding is urgently required for animals occupying wetlands, among the most threatened of all habitats globally. In this thesis I focus on the ecology and conservation of shorebirds, a group comprising many threatened and declining species dependent on wetlands throughout much of their annual cycle. I focus on threats operating within Australia, where wetland loss and degradation continues due to human activity. Non-migratory shorebird species that travel widely across Australia’s inland wetlands have been reported as declining in eastern Australia, but a national assessment is lacking. Migratory shorebird species that visit Australia from breeding grounds overseas appear to be declining most due to factors beyond Australia’s borders, but it is not clear if threats located in Australia are exacerbating these declines. I make the most of the rich data available on shorebirds in Australia to address these knowledge gaps, in the hopes of better targeting shorebird conservation actions in Australia. In chapter one I introduce the importance of conserving migratory and highly mobile species. I then review how pulses in resource availability such as those exemplified by Australia’s ephemeral wetlands impact wildlife populations. I also provide an overview of shorebird conservation in Australia. These introductions provide the theoretical underpinning for the work presented later, and highlight the challenges inherent in understanding where and when highly mobile species such as shorebirds have been impacted.
    [Show full text]
  • School Projects for Monitoring the State of the Marine Environment
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 457 021 SE 065 183 AUTHOR Benkendorff, Kirsten TITLE School Projects for Monitoring the State of the Marine Environment. PUB DATE 2001-07-00 NOTE 7p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Science Teachers Association (Sydney, Australia, July 2001). PUB TYPE Guides Non-Classroom (055) Speeches/Meeting Papers (150) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Biodiversity; Elementary Secondary Education; Foreign Countries; *Government School Relationship; Habitats; Hands on Science; *Marine Biology; *Science Curriculum; Science Instruction; *Science Projects IDENTIFIERS *Australia ABSTRACT Australia's marine environment hosts a high level of diverse endemic species along with some of the highest biodiversity in the world. Two-thirds of the population of Australia are living in coastal areas and can be considered a threat to marine life which is very vulnerable to human impacts. Although marine environments conserve high economic values, long-term research on changes in marine life and its conservation are very limited. This paper provides insight into the implementation of marine education in the science curricula and discusses the advantages of involving .schools in long-term monitoring of marine environments for management purposes. (Contains 10 references.) (YDS) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. School Projects for Monitoring the State of the Marine Environment by Kirsten Benekendorff U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION dice 01 Educational Research and improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND CENTER (ERIC) DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS This document has been reproduced as BEEN GRANTED BY 'received from the person or organization originating it.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of Protozoan Parasites Recorded in Australia Peter J. O
    1 CATALOGUE OF PROTOZOAN PARASITES RECORDED IN AUSTRALIA PETER J. O’DONOGHUE & ROBERT D. ADLARD O’Donoghue, P.J. & Adlard, R.D. 2000 02 29: Catalogue of protozoan parasites recorded in Australia. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 45(1):1-164. Brisbane. ISSN 0079-8835. Published reports of protozoan species from Australian animals have been compiled into a host- parasite checklist, a parasite-host checklist and a cross-referenced bibliography. Protozoa listed include parasites, commensals and symbionts but free-living species have been excluded. Over 590 protozoan species are listed including amoebae, flagellates, ciliates and ‘sporozoa’ (the latter comprising apicomplexans, microsporans, myxozoans, haplosporidians and paramyxeans). Organisms are recorded in association with some 520 hosts including mammals, marsupials, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish and invertebrates. Information has been abstracted from over 1,270 scientific publications predating 1999 and all records include taxonomic authorities, synonyms, common names, sites of infection within hosts and geographic locations. Protozoa, parasite checklist, host checklist, bibliography, Australia. Peter J. O’Donoghue, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia 4072, Australia; Robert D. Adlard, Protozoa Section, Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane 4101, Australia; 31 January 2000. CONTENTS the literature for reports relevant to contemporary studies. Such problems could be avoided if all previous HOST-PARASITE CHECKLIST 5 records were consolidated into a single database. Most Mammals 5 researchers currently avail themselves of various Reptiles 21 electronic database and abstracting services but none Amphibians 26 include literature published earlier than 1985 and not all Birds 34 journal titles are covered in their databases. Fish 44 Invertebrates 54 Several catalogues of parasites in Australian PARASITE-HOST CHECKLIST 63 hosts have previously been published.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Threatened Bird Species in the Hunter Region
    !"#$%&$'$()*+#(),-$.+$,)/0'&$#)1$2+3') !"$)4"+,&5$#)!"#$%&%'6)789:) The status of threatened bird species in the Hunter Region Michael Roderick1 and Alan Stuart2 156 Karoola Road, Lambton, NSW 2299 281 Queens Road, New Lambton, NSW 2305 ) ;%'<)*+#(),-$.+$,)5+,&$()%,)=05'$#%*5$>)?'(%'2$#$()3#)@#+&+.%55<)?'(%'2$#$()A.355$.&+B$5<)#$C$##$()&3)%,) !"#$%&"%'%()*+,'(%$+"#%+!"#$%&$'$()*+$,-$.)/0'.$#1%&-0')2,&)3445)ADE4F)have been recorded within the Hunter Region. The majority are resident or regular migrants. Some species are vagrants, and some seabirds) #$205%#5<) -#$,$'&) %#$) '3&) #$5+%'&) 3') &"$) 1$2+3') C3#) ,0#B+B%5G) !"$) %0&"3#,) "%B$) #$B+$H$() &"$) #$2+3'%5),&%&0,)3C)%55),-$.+$,>)H+&")-%#&+.05%#)C3.0,)3')&"$)#$,+($'&,)%'()#$205%#)B+,+&3#,G)!"$).3',$#B%&+3') ,&%&0,)C3#)$%."),-$.+$,)+,)2+B$'>)+'.50(+'2)H"$#$)#$5$B%'&)&"$),&%&0,)0'($#)&"$)Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth) and the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) review. R$.$'&)#$.3#(,)C3#)&"$)1$2+3')%#$).3I-%#$()H+&")-#$B+30,)-$#+3(,>)53.%5)&"#$%&,) %#$)#$B+$H$()%'()&"$)30&533J)C3#)$%."),-$.+$,)+,)(+,.0,,$(G)) ) ) INTRODUCTION is relevant. The two measures of conservation status are: The Threatened Species Conservation (TSC) Act 1995 is the primary legislation for the protection of The Environment Protection and Biodiversity threatened flora and fauna species in NSW. The Conservation (EPBC) Act 1999 is the NSW Scientific Committee is the key group equivalent threatened species legislation at the responsible for the review of the conservation Commonwealth level. status of threatened species, including the listing of those species. More than 100 bird species are A measure of conservation status that can also listed as threatened under the TSC Act, and the be applied at sub-species level was developed Scientific Committee supports the listing of by the International Union for Conservation of additional species.
    [Show full text]
  • Pied Oystercatcher Haematopus Longirostris Review of Current Information in NSW May 2008
    NSW SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Pied Oystercatcher Haematopus longirostris Review of Current Information in NSW May 2008 Current status: The Pied Oystercatcher Haematopus longirostris is currently listed as Rare in South Australia under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972 (NPW Act), but is not listed under Commonwealth legislation. The NSW Scientific Committee recently determined that the Pied Oystercatcher meets criteria for listing as Endangered in NSW under the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (TSC Act), based on information contained in this report and other information available for the species. Species description: The Pied Oystercatcher is a medium-sized (45 cm), sturdy, strikingly black and white shorebird with a long orange-red bill, red eyes and stout red-pink legs. It has distinctive loud, piping calls. A similar species, the Sooty Oystercatcher Haematopus fuliginosus, has the same red bill, eyes and legs but is wholly black. Taxonomy: Haematopus longirostris Vieillot 1817, is monotypic (i.e. no subspecies) and an Australasian endemic species in a cosmopolitan genus. Distribution and number of populations: In NSW the Pied Oystercatcher occupies beaches and inlets along the entire coast, the northern and southern populations having possible interchange with the Queensland and Victorian populations, respectively. It occurs and breeds around the Australian and Tasmanian coastlines, but has declined throughout much of its range and is of conservation concern in south-eastern Australia because it is vulnerable to habitat destruction
    [Show full text]
  • Sooty Oystercatcher Haematopus Fuliginosus Review of Current Information in NSW May 2008
    NSW SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Sooty Oystercatcher Haematopus fuliginosus Review of Current Information in NSW May 2008 Current status: The Sooty Oystercatcher Haematopus fuliginosus is currently listed as Near Threatened in Victoria (Advisory List only), Rare in South Australia under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972 (NPW Act), Rare in Queensland under the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (NC Act), but is not listed under Commonwealth legislation. The NSW Scientific Committee recently determined that the Sooty Oystercatcher meets criteria for listing as Vulnerable in NSW under the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (TSC Act), based on information contained in this report and other information available for the species. Species description: The Sooty Oystercatcher is a medium-sized (45 cm in length), sturdy black shorebird with a long orange-red bill, red eyes and stout red-pink legs. It has distinctive loud, piping calls. The Pied Oystercatcher Haematopus longirostris is black and white, with similarly red bill, eyes and legs. Taxonomy: Haematopus fuliginosus Gould 1845 is an Australian endemic species in a cosmopolitan genus. The subspecies in NSW and elsewhere around southern Australian coasts, north to about 25°S, is the nominate H. f. fuliginosus. Haematopus fuliginosus. opthalmicus Castelneau & Ramsay 1877 occurs around the tropical coasts, and intergrades with the nominate subspecies where they come into contact. Distribution and number of populations: In NSW the Sooty Oystercatcher occupies rocky headlands, reefs and offshore islands along the entire coast, apparently as a single continuous population. It occurs and breeds around the Australian and Tasmanian coastlines, where it is vulnerable to human disturbance (Marchant & Higgins 1993; expert advice).
    [Show full text]