8 Water Quality

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

8 Water Quality Water quality “Like swift water, an active mind never stagnates.” 8 — Author unknown efining water quality depends on its Sediments intended use. A particular body of water Sediments are small soil particles carried by D might be clean enough for farm irriga- surface runoff from logging, forestry, construc- tion and yet too polluted for drinking water. tion, mining, or agricultural sites. Sediments can Water could be clean enough for drinking water, carry nutrients and pesticides that degrade water and yet still be too warm for some aquatic organ- quality. Sediments may settle to the bottom of isms to live in it. streams, smothering aquatic life and fish spawn- Natural conditions sometimes make water ing areas. unsuitable for use. High levels of some inerals and salts are common in some areas, making water unfit for drinking. In other places the Toxics natural quality of the water has been degraded. Toxics can include pesticides, heavy metals, We call this water polluted. Guidelines from the petroleum products from leaking underground Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for storage tanks, solvents, and water runoff from surface waters often refer to a goal of being hazardous waste disposal sites and landfills. The “fishable and swimmable.” While this does not greatest sources of toxics are sewage and indus- provide precise values for various pollutants it trial wastewater. Toxics are also found in runoff does give a general goal. Water must be clean from forests, farms and urban areas. enough to allow aquatic life to live and not be a hazard to public health. Several types of water pollutants are discussed below. Nutrients Nutrients, such as nitrogen and phosphorus, increase the growth of aquatic plants. When the Bacteria plants die and decay they may make the water Bacteria can come from improperly or incom- pletely treated sewage, failing septic systems, and livestock manure. High levels of bacteria Vocabulary indicate the presence of micro-organisms that can bacteria toxics cause disease. Tests are often done to determine beneficial uses nutrients the concentrations of fecal coliform bacteria. Clean Water Act dissolved oxygen Fecal coliform counts are used as an indicator of coliform non-point source water quality. eutrophication pollution groundwater point source pollution surface water pollution sediments Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife Water quality • 235 unsuitable for other uses. Excess nutrients may beneficial uses, point sources of pollution— be washed into streams and lakes from sewage those that come from an identifiable source such and septic systems, livestock and pet wastes, and as a pipe—are controlled first. These sources of fertilizers. pollution are the easiest and generally least expensive to find and control. If controlling point Heat sources is not enough to achieve water quality standards, then non-point sources of pollution, Water temperature is critical to many kinds of those that come from wide areas, such as soil aquatic life. Water temperature can be increased eroded from uplands, are included in efforts to when warmer water, from industrial processes or clean up the water. (See Table 2.) irrigation returns, is added to streams. But the Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act most important factor in raising water tempera- requires that bodies of water that cannot achieve tures in Oregon streams and rivers is a lack of the standards by controlling point source pollu- shade. Without a canopy of vegetation, solar tion alone are placed on a special list—the radiation heats water in streams. Shade does not 303(d) list—and additional measures must be cool water. It helps prevent it from heating. taken to help them achieve the standards. Al- though the Clean Water Act is a federal law, Dissolved oxygen individual states have responsibility for deter- It is not dissolved oxygen, but the lack of it that mining which bodies of water should be on the results from pollution. Dissolved oxygen is 303(d) list. In Oregon, the Department of Envi- essential for the survival of fish and aquatic life. ronmental Quality (DEQ) is responsible for this The decay process—for organic materials list. It is compiled using the best scientific and washed into streams or the increased plant technical information available. In the past growth that goes along with the addition of extra several years many more lakes and segments of nutrients—uses oxygen, making it unavailable streams and rivers have been added to the list. for fish or other aquatic life. Recent additions do not mean that water quality in Oregon is getting worse, but instead reflects more information and knowledge about waters in Clean Water Act the state. Currently there are 1,067 streams and The Clean Water Act includes federal water rivers, 32 lakes and 1,168 stream segments on the quality standards. The standards vary from list. stream to stream and are based on research data. These standards are set according to the natural, or background, conditions for each body of Groundwater water. A stream fed by hot springs is not ex- When we think of water pollution we most often pected to have the same temperature as one fed connect it with rivers, streams, lakes, and other solely by melting snow. The standards are also bodies of surface water. Groundwater can also based on the beneficial uses for that particular suffer from pollution. Groundwater is a precious body of water. The list of beneficial uses is resource. Each day in Oregon 700 million gallons defined by law and includes things as drinking of groundwater are used. The drinking water water, recreation, preserving healthy conditions supply for almost 77% of Oregonians comes, at for aquatic life, fisheries, aesthetics, and irriga- least partially, from groundwater. Groundwater tion. When there are competing beneficial uses in supplies some or all of the drinking water to a river or stream, the Department of Environmen- 3,100 public water systems. tal Quality (DEQ) is required to protect the Groundwater is easily contaminated by beneficial uses that are most sensitive. pollutants. Pollutants dissolved in water can When a particular body of water is identified percolate through the soil and become part of as below the water quality standards for its 236 • The Stream Scene: Watersheds, Wildlife and People Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife groundwater. Groundwater contamination is is hidden in many everyday activities. Non-point often caused by leaking landfills, failing septic source pollutants come from farm fields, pas- systems, runoff from animal feed yards, leaking tures, backyards, parks, streets, roads, mines, and underground storage tanks, and the improper use construction sites. Anything on the surface of the of fertilizers and pesticides. Nitrates are the most land can be carried with surface runoff to gutters, common form of groundwater pollution. Nitrates storm drains, or ditches and then on to streams come from fertilizers and human and animal and rivers. Some common sources of non-point wastes. Drinking water contaminated with high source pollutants include: levels of nitrates can be harmful to humans and • household chemicals and soaps from livestock. Contaminated groundwater is very driveways, roofs, and yards; difficult, sometimes impossible, to clean up. As • fertilizers and pesticides from farm fields, of March 1993, DEQ had identified 1,359 yards, parks, golf courses, and landscaped groundwater contamination sites in Oregon. areas; • oil, anti-freeze, and other toxic materials Sources of pollutants from streets and roads; Generally we associate water pollution with • eroded soil from farm fields, logging pollutants that come from a pipe, such as dis- areas, and construction sites; charges from factories and sewage treatment • failing septic tanks; and plants. Point source pollutants include heavy • manure from livestock and pets. metals, toxic chemicals, heated water, sewage, radioactive materials and other pollutants from industrial or municipal sources. Often, point Controlling water pollution source pollutants are the most dangerous. But they are not the only pollutants. It is easier and cheaper to prevent pollution than In terms of the volume of pollutants the it is to clean it up. It is illegal to discharge largest source is non-point source pollution in the pollutants into Oregon waters without a permit form of surface water runoff. Rainwater and from DEQ. Some pollution, such as treated melting snow pick up and carry soil, garbage, effluent from sewage treatment plants, is allowed and various toxics as they wash over streets, when a stream is able to process it without roofs, lawns, constructions sites, logging sites, degrading its quality. DEQ has responsibility for and farm fields. It is estimated that non-point seeing that pollution problems are addressed. sources are responsible for half or more of all This agency works with other agencies to ensure nitrogen, coliform bacteria, iron, phosphorus, oil, that the job of controlling pollution, both point zinc, lead, chromium, and copper that enter the and non-point, progresses. Agencies responsible surface waters of the United States. Sediments for forestry, urban areas, and agriculture all play from non-point sources alone are responsible for a part in controlling pollution. Individual cities an estimated $6 billion in damage per year. Even are responsible for overseeing their municipal though many non-point source pollutants are less wastes. toxic than some industrial wastes, they still The Oregon Department of Forestry is damage fish and wildlife and their habitats, responsible for designing and enforcing measures degrade drinking water supplies, promote in the Oregon Forest Practices Act to prevent and eutrophication, and damage the aesthetics and the control non-point source pollution from forest recreation potential of Oregon’s waters. lands. Responsibility for non-point source Non-point source pollution carried with pollution from rural and agricultural lands rests surface water runoff is hard to detect and control with the Oregon Department of Agriculture. because it does not come from a single source.
Recommended publications
  • The Effect of Water Temperature on Aquatic Organisms: a Review of Knowledge and Methods for Assessing Biotic Responses to Temperature
    The effect of water temperature on aquatic organisms: a review of knowledge and methods for assessing biotic responses to temperature Report to the Water Research Commission by Helen Dallas The Freshwater Consulting Group Freshwater Research Unit Department of Zoology University of Cape Town WRC Report No. KV 213/09 30 28 26 24 22 C) o 20 18 16 14 Temperature ( 12 10 8 6 4 Jul '92 Jul Oct '91 Apr '92 Jun '92 Jan '93 Mar '92 Feb '92 Feb '93 Aug '91 Nov '91 Nov '91 Dec Aug '92 Sep '92 '92 Nov '92 Dec May '92 Sept '91 Month and Year i Obtainable from Water Research Commission Private Bag X03 GEZINA, 0031 [email protected] The publication of this report emanates from a project entitled: The effect of water temperature on aquatic organisms: A review of knowledge and methods for assessing biotic responses to temperature (WRC project no K8/690). DISCLAIMER This report has been reviewed by the Water Research Commission (WRC) and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the WRC, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use ISBN978-1-77005-731-9 Printed in the Republic of South Africa ii Preface This report comprises five deliverables for the one-year consultancy project to the Water Research Commission, entitled “The effect of water temperature on aquatic organisms – a review of knowledge and methods for assessing biotic responses to temperature” (K8-690). Deliverable 1 (Chapter 1) is a literature review aimed at consolidating available information pertaining to water temperature in aquatic ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Limitation of Primary Productivity in a Southwestern
    37 MO i LIMITATION OF PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY IN A SOUTHWESTERN RESERVOIR DUE TO THERMAL POLLUTION THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE By Tom J. Stuart, B.S. Denton, Texas August, ]977 Stuart, Tom J., Limitation of Primary Productivity in a Southwestern Reseroir Due to Thermal Pollution. Master of Sciences (Biological Sciences), August, ]977, 53 pages, 6 tables, 7 figures, 55 titles. Evidence is presented to support the conclusions that (1) North Lake reservoir is less productive, contains lower standing crops of phytoplankton and total organic carbon than other local reservoirs; (2) that neither the phytoplankton nor their instantaneously-determined primary productivity was detrimentally affected by the power plant entrainment and (3) that the effect of the power plant is to cause nutrient limitation of the phytoplankton primary productivity by long- term, subtle, thermally-linked nutrient precipitation activities. ld" TABLE OF CONTENTS Page iii LIST OF TABLES.................. ----------- iv LIST OF FIGURES ........ ....- -- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .-................ v Chapter I. INTRODUCTION. ...................... 1 II. METHODS AND MATERIALS ........ 5 III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION................ 11 Phytoplankton Studies Primary Productivity Studies IV. CONCLUSIONS. ............................ 40 APPENDIX. ............................... 42 REFERENCES.........-....... ... .. 49 ii LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Selected Comparative Data from Area Reservoirs Near North Lake.............................18 2. List of Phytoplankton Observed in North Lake .. 22 3. Percentage Composition of Phytoplankton in North Lake. ................................. 28 4. Values of H.Computed for Phytoplankton Volumes and Cell Numbers for North Lake ............ 31 5. Primary Production Values Observed in Various Lakes of the World in Comparison to North Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Thermal Pollution Effect on End Part of Stream Mahmoud, Amaal, O
    International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE) ISSN: 2278-3075, Volume-9 Issue-3, January 2020 Determination of Thermal Pollution Effect on End Part of Stream Mahmoud, Amaal, O. F., El Nadi, M.H., Nasr, N. A.H., Ezat, M.B. In view of these developments, a variety of new ABSTRACT-The present study was conducted to evaluate the energy infrastructures to meet the demands for population environmental impact of thermal effluent sources on the main growth that lead the decision makers to redirect the rudder water quality parameters at the low flow conditions. The low flow towards the power plants. That was in order to provide a causes the flow velocity to be low which causes accumulation of continuous source of electricity as a clean and renewable any pollutant source. The study was performed by creating a 2-d model of the last reach of Rosetta branch at winter closure. Delft source of energy. Contrariwise, Power plants might cause 3d software is used to create a hydro-dynamic model to simulate Intensive damages on the environment. If these damages the flow pattern within a 5 km of the branch upstream Edfina were not studied and carefully planned before construction regulator. Water quality model is coupled afterwards to simulate and operation, therefore impact assessment of power plants the water quality parameters. A base case scenario of the current is nesses. Egypt also faced same challenges in consuming state at the low flow condition is set up and calibrated. Another the massive amount of energy in the past few years, can be scenario is performed after adding a thermal pollutant source.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the Salmonid Decline in the Russian River
    A HISTORY OF THE SALMONID DECLINE IN THE RUSSIAN RIVER A Cooperative Project Sponsored by Sonoma County Water Agency California State Coastal Conservancy Steiner Environmental Consulting Prepared by Steiner Environmental Consulting August 1996 Steiner Environmental Consulting Fisheries, Wildlife, and Environmental Quality P. O. Box 250 Potter Valley, CA 95469 A HISTORY OF THE SALMONID DECLINE IN THE RUSSIAN RIVER A Cooperative Project Sponsored By Sonoma County Water Agency California State Coastal Conservancy Steiner Environmental Consulting Prepared by Steiner Environmental Consulting P.O. Box 250 Potter Valley, CA 95469 August 1996 (707) 743-1815 (707) 743-1816 f«x [email protected] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND Introduction This report gathers together the best available information to provide the historical and current status of chinook salmon, coho salmon, pink salmon, and steelhead in the Russian River basin. Although the historical records are limited, all sources depict a river system where the once dominant salmonids have declined dramatically. The last 150 years of human activities have transformed the Russian River basin into a watershed heavily altered by agriculture and urban development. Flows in the main river channel river are heavily regulated. The result is a river system with significantly compromised biological functions. The anthropogenic factors contributing to the decline of salmonids are discussed. Study Area The 1,485 square mile Russian River watershed, roughly 80 miles long and 10 to 30 miles wide, lies in Mendocino, Sonoma, and Lake counties. The basin topography is characterized by a sequence of northwest/southeast trending fault-block ridges and alluvial valleys. Lying within a region of Mediterranean climate, the watershed is divided into a fog-influenced coastal region and an interior region of hot, dry summers.
    [Show full text]
  • Diffuse Pollution, Degraded Waters Emerging Policy Solutions
    Diffuse Pollution, Degraded Waters Emerging Policy Solutions Policy HIGHLIGHTS Diffuse Pollution, Degraded Waters Emerging Policy Solutions “OECD countries have struggled to adequately address diffuse water pollution. It is much easier to regulate large, point source industrial and municipal polluters than engage with a large number of farmers and other land-users where variable factors like climate, soil and politics come into play. But the cumulative effects of diffuse water pollution can be devastating for human well-being and ecosystem health. Ultimately, they can undermine sustainable economic growth. Many countries are trying innovative policy responses with some measure of success. However, these approaches need to be replicated, adapted and massively scaled-up if they are to have an effect.” Simon Upton – OECD Environment Director POLICY H I GH LI GHT S After decades of regulation and investment to reduce point source water pollution, OECD countries still face water quality challenges (e.g. eutrophication) from diffuse agricultural and urban sources of pollution, i.e. pollution from surface runoff, soil filtration and atmospheric deposition. The relative lack of progress reflects the complexities of controlling multiple pollutants from multiple sources, their high spatial and temporal variability, the associated transactions costs, and limited political acceptability of regulatory measures. The OECD report Diffuse Pollution, Degraded Waters: Emerging Policy Solutions (OECD, 2017) outlines the water quality challenges facing OECD countries today. It presents a range of policy instruments and innovative case studies of diffuse pollution control, and concludes with an integrated policy framework to tackle this challenge. An optimal approach will likely entail a mix of policy interventions reflecting the basic OECD principles of water quality management – pollution prevention, treatment at source, the polluter pays and the beneficiary pays principles, equity, and policy coherence.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal Pollution Abatement Evaluation Model for Power Plant Siting
    THERMAL POLLUTION ABATEMENT EVALUATION MODEL FOR POWER PLANT SITING P. F. Shiers D. H. Marks Report #MIT-EL 73-013 February 1973 a" pO ENERGY LABORATORY The Energy Laboratory was established by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology as a Special Laboratory of the Institute for research on the complex societal and technological problems of the supply, demand and consumptionof energy. Its full-time staff assists in focusing the diverse research at the Institute to permit undertaking of long term interdisciplinary projects of considerable magnitude. For any specific program, the relative roles of the Energy Laboratory, other special laboratories, academic departments and laboratories depend upon the technologies and issues involved. Because close coupling with the nor- .ral academic teaching and research activities of the Institute is an important feature of the Energy Laboratory, its principal activities are conducted on the Institute's Cambridge Campus. This study was done in association with the Electric Power Systems Engineering Laboratory and the Department of Civil Engineering (Ralph H. Parsons Laboratory for Water Resources and Hydrodynamics and the Civil Engineering Systems Laboratory). -Offtl -. W% ABSTRACT A THERMAL POLLUTION ABATE.ENT EVALUATION MODEL FOR POWER PLANT SITING A thermal pollution abatement model for power plant siting is formulated to evaluate the economic costs, resource requirements, and physical characteristics of a particular thermal pollution abatement technology at a given site type for a plant alternative. The model also provides a screening capability to determine which sites are feasible alternatives for development by the calculation of the resource requirements and a check of the applicable thermal standards, and determining whether the plant alternative could be built on the available site in compliance with the thermal standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytoplankton Communities Impacted by Thermal Effluents Off Two Coastal Nuclear Power Plants in Subtropical Areas of Northern Taiwan
    Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci., Vol. 27, No. 1, 107-120, February 2016 doi: 10.3319/TAO.2015.09.24.01(Oc) Phytoplankton Communities Impacted by Thermal Effluents off Two Coastal Nuclear Power Plants in Subtropical Areas of Northern Taiwan Wen-Tseng Lo1, Pei-Kai Hsu1, Tien-Hsi Fang 2, Jian-Hwa Hu 2, and Hung-Yen Hsieh 3, 4, * 1 Institute of Marine Biotechnology and Resources, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, R.O.C. 2 Department of Marine Environmental Informatics, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan, R.O.C. 3 Graduate Institute of Marine Biology, National Dong Hwa University, Pingtung, Taiwan, R.O.C. 4 National Museum of Marine Biology and Aquarium, Pingtung, Taiwan, R.O.C. Received 30 December 2014, revised 21 September 2015, accepted 24 September 2015 ABSTRACT This study investigates the seasonal and spatial differences in phytoplankton communities in the coastal waters off two nuclear power plants in northern Taiwan in 2009. We identified 144 phytoplankton taxa in our samples, including 127 diatoms, 16 dinoflagellates, and one cyanobacteria. Four diatoms, namely, Thalassionema nitzschioides (T. nitzschioides), Pseudo-nitzschia delicatissima (P. delicatissima), Paralia sulcate (P. sulcata), and Chaetoceros curvisetus (C. curvisetus) and one dinoflagellate Prorocentrum micans (P. micans) were predominant during the study period. Clear seasonal and spatial differences in phytoplankton abundance and species composition were evident in the study area. Generally, a higher mean phytoplankton abundance was observed in the waters off the First Nuclear Power Plant (NPP I) than at the Second Nuclear Power Plant (NPP II). The phytoplankton abundance was usually high in the coastal waters during warm periods and in the offshore waters in winter.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Theoretical Considerations of Thermal Discharge in Shallow Lakes
    Some theoretical considerations of thermal discharge in shallow lakes Heating of freshwater lakes or streams (so on its influence on fish spawning and to study those natural algae that are called thermal pollution) is an incidental behaviour. present normally in smaller amounts but result of many industrial processes, but Much of this work involves the effect on are extinguished due to their lack of mainly of the production of electricity. single species, but thermal discharges adaptation to changing environment. We do In this paper we try to identify the areas of may be important in changing the species not know if the early spring blooms of greatest concern in this problem. We like composition of population, especially diatoms are unimportant for the food to start with a few introductory remarks where this is regulated by competition, chains of lakes, because they appear too about the similarities and contrasts to grazing, and prédation. early for the zooplankton. It is possible thermal pollution of seawater. One may know the lethal temperatures and that they are important because in early The natural cycle of water is on a scale minimum temperatures, and the minimum spring they suppress the blue green algae which is more than sufficient to supply duration of a given temperature for egg and through their indirect effect on the man's needs; about 100,000 kma flows production. And in spite of this, no algae that follow the diatom bloom they downrivers each year and is adequate for prediction can be made on the ecological may ultimately affect the zooplankton.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 2. Pollution and Water Quality Pollution Sources
    NEIGHBORHOOD WATER QUALITY Lesson 2. Pollution and Water Quality Keywords: pollutants, water pollution, point source, non-point source, urban pollution, agricultural pollution, atmospheric pollution, smog, nutrient pollution, eutrophication, organic pollution, herbicides, pesticides, chemical pollution, sediment pollution, stormwater runoff, urbanization, algae, phosphate, nitrogen, ion, nitrate, nitrite, ammonia, nitrifying bacteria, proteins, water quality, pH, acid, alkaline, basic, neutral, dissolved oxygen, organic material, temperature, thermal pollution, salinity Pollution Sources Water becomes polluted when point source pollution. This type of foreign substances enter the pollution is difficult to identify and environment and are transported into may come from pesticides, fertilizers, the water cycle. These substances, or automobile fluids washed off the known as pollutants, contaminate ground by a storm. Non-point source the water and are sometimes pollution comes from three main harmful to people and the areas: urban-industrial, agricultural, environment. Therefore, water and atmospheric sources. pollution is any change in water that is harmful to living organisms. Urban pollution comes from the cities, where many people live Sources of water pollution are together on a small amount of land. divided into two main categories: This type of pollution results from the point source and non-point source. things we do around our homes and Point source pollution occurs when places of work. Agricultural a pollutant is discharged at a specific pollution comes from rural areas source. In other words, the source of where fewer people live. This type of the pollutant can be easily identified. pollution results from runoff from Examples of point-source pollution farmland, and consists of pesticides, include a leaking pipe or a holding fertilizer, and eroded soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal Pollution: a Potential Threat to Our Aquatic Environment James E
    Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review Volume 1 | Issue 2 Article 4 6-1-1971 Thermal Pollution: A Potential Threat to Our Aquatic Environment James E. A John Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/ealr Part of the Environmental Law Commons, and the Water Law Commons Recommended Citation James E. A John, Thermal Pollution: A Potential Threat to Our Aquatic Environment, 1 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 287 (1971), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/ealr/vol1/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THERMAL POLLUTION: A POTENTIAL THREAT TO OUR AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT By 'James E. A. 'John-:' INTRODUCTION Thermal pollution has come to mean the detrimental effects of unnatural temperature changes in a natural body of water, caused by the discharge of industrial cooling water. The electric power industry accounts for over 80% of the cooling water used, so this discussion will focus mainly on that industry. So great are the electric power requirements of this nation and the resultant need for cooling water, it is estimated that at certain times of year, the electric power utilities require 50% of the total fresh water runoff for cooling. At the present time, roughly 85% of the electric power in this country is produced by steam power plants, the remainder by hydroelectric plants.
    [Show full text]
  • COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOWS Guidance for Long-Term Control Plan Offbtiw-Maragement MUNICIPAL TECHNOLOGY BRANCH STAPLE HERE
    United States Office Of Water EPA 832-B-95-002 Environmental Protection (4204) September 1995 Agency EPA Combined Sewer Overflows Guidance For Long-TermControl Plan EPA/832-B-95-002 August 1995 Combined Sewer Overflows Guidance for Long-Term Control Plan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Wastewater Management Washington, DC 20460 Recycled/Recyclablel Printed with VegetableBased Inks on RecycledPaper (20% Postconsumer) NOTICE The statements in this document are intended solely as guidance. This document is not intended, nor can it be relied on, to create any rights enforceable by any party in litigation with the United States. EPA and State officials may decide to follow the guidance provided in this document, or to act at variance with the guidance, based on an analysis of specific site circumstances. This guidance may be revised without public notice to reflect changes in EPA’s strategy for implementation of the Clean Water Act and its implementing regulations, or to clarify and update the text, Mention of trade names or commercial products in this document does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation for use. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 OFFICEOF MEMORANDUM WATER SUBJECT: Guidance for Long Term Control Plan FROM: Michael B. Cook, Office of Wastewater Management (4201) TO: Interested Parties I am pleased to provide you with the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA'S) guidance document on the development and implementation of a long-term control plan for combined sewer overflows (CSOs). This document is one of several being prepared to foster implementation of EPA's CSO Control Policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Monitoring of Coho Salmon and Steelhead During Freshwater Life Stages in Coastal Marin County 2017Annual Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Long-term Monitoring of Coho Salmon and Steelhead During Freshwater Life Stages in Coastal Marin County 2017Annual Report Natural Resource Report NPS/SFAN/NRR—2020/2149 ON THIS PAGE Field staff transfer fish captured while performing electrofishing surveys to recovery buckets using nets for passing in Redwood Creek, Marin County, CA. Photo courtesy of Martha Ture ON THE COVER A male hatchery reared coho salmon moves upstream to spawn in Redwood Creek, Marin County CA. Photo courtesy of National Park Service Long-term Monitoring of Coho Salmon and Steelhead During Freshwater Life Stages in Coastal Marin County 2017Annual Report Natural Resource Report NPS/SFAN/NRR—2020/2149 Michael Reichmuth,1 Brentley McNeill,2 Sarah Carlisle2 1National Park Service, San Francisco Bay Area Network Inventory and Monitoring Program Point Reyes National Seashore 1 Bear Valley Road Point Reyes Station, California 94956 2Point Reyes National Seashore Association, Coho and Steelhead Monitoring Program 1 Bear Valley Road Point Reyes Station, California 94956 June 2020 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service.
    [Show full text]