The Co-Chairman Mr LAGENDIJK Opened the Meeting at 15H10

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Co-Chairman Mr LAGENDIJK Opened the Meeting at 15H10 EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 58th MEETING OF THE EU-TURKEY JOINT PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE Ankara, 21-22 November 2007 MINUTES Contents Page 1. Adoption of the draft agenda 2 2. Adoption of the minutes of 57th EU-Turkey JPC Meeting which took place 2 in Brussels on 27-28 November 2007 3. Political situation in Turkey and the EU 2 Introductory statements by - the Turkish Government - the Presidency-in-office - the European Commission - the Rapporteur of the European Parliament 4. The Lisbon Treaty and its importance for Turkey's accession 9 5. Iraq and cooperation in the fight against terrorism 11 6. Any other business 13 7. Date and place of the next meeting 13 ANNEX: List of participants PV/721908EN.doc PE 406.738 1. Adoption of the draft agenda The draft agenda was adopted. 2. Adoption of the minutes of the 57th EU-Turkey JPC meeting which took place in Brussels on 27-28 November 2006 After an exchange of views the minutes were adopted with three modifications. 3. Political situation in Turkey and EU The Joint Parliamentary Committee heard a welcome address by Mr Köksal TOPTAN, speaker of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey, in which he focused on the importance of the Turkish accession to the EU. In particular, he pointed out to the foreign policy dimension of Turkey's membership, which would strengthen the EU´s role on the international scene. Also, he underlined that the accession process is not only about the modernisation of Turkish society and economy, but also about values Turkey shares with the EU. In this respect, he referred to the importance of the "Alliance of Civilisations", launched jointly by Prime Minister Erdogan and the Prime Minister of Spain, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, on the floor of the United Nations. Before concluding, the speaker stressed that only full EU membership is acceptable for Turkey as the goal of the current process. Following this opening speech, Mr Ali BABACAN, Minister of Foreign Affairs and Chief Negotiator, addressed the committee on behalf of the Turkish Government. He summarized the efforts undertaken by the government on the road to accession since the EU Copenhagen Summit of December 2002, and reiterated that now the key issue would be to "digest" the reforms undertaken on paper. Referring to the 2007 political turbulences, he stressed that these demonstrated the deep culture and stable anchors of the Turkish democracy. He presented a picture of the development of accession negotiations since 2005, regretted political constraints imposed on the process by the Cyprus problem in spite of Turkish support for the Annan Plan and put emphasis on his expectation that the negotiations will go on along the principle of pacta sunt servanda. At the same time he recalled the plan of the government from April 2007 to realise all necessary reforms along an own timetable to the benefit of the Turkish people, without regard to the actual developments in the EU. Speaking about the currently prepared constitutional reform he assured the committee that other reforms would not be waiting during this work. The minister devoted the last part of his speech to the growing importance of Turkey in the broader Middle East. Mrs Renate SOMMER drew in the following questions-and-answers session the attention of the Minister to the role of women in Turkey and in particular to possible considerations of the government to improve the rights of women in the prepared constitution. Mrs Emine BOZKURT asked on the same topic whether any concrete projects would be planned in the short time, and added a question concerning the plans to finally reform article 301 of the penal code. PV/721908EN.doc 2 PE 406.738 Mrs Ria OOMEN-RUIJTEN wanted to know how to reach, in the Minister's opinion, progress on the Cyprus problem. Also, while stressing that Turkey's strength in the region would remain diminished by the poor Turkish-Armenian relations, she asked how the EU could help Turkey lift the blockade of the Armenian border. Answering these questions Mr BABACAN insisted that the real challenge as far as women rights were concerned was the implementation of amended legislation, ensuring that the real situation of women improves; in this regard the government would in particular focus on bringing education into poor families. On the question of the 301 he made clear that the government already had decided to change it, now it would be in the hands of the Parliament, who, as the Minister hoped, would deal with it as soon as the budget would have been adopted. Moving to the Cyprus issue he reiterated the good will of the Turkish side to resolve the problem and expressed his hope that 2008 would bring a significant step forward, provided this will was given on both sides. On the relations with Armenia he sketched out measures taken by Ankara in last years to help open dialogue with Yerevan. However, no dialogue could develop if linked to preconditions; it had to be up to historians to judge the past. Also, no parliamentary votes could establish what had happened nearly hundred years ago. Opening the second round of questions, Mr. Joost LAGENDIJK returned to the issue of the reform of Article 301 asking when exactly the government would intend to send the amendment to the parliament, and whether the government was in disposal of an analysis on reforms needed to fully guarantee the freedom of speech. Mr. Marios MATSAKIS appreciated the will of the Turkish government to intensify the confidence building measures on Cyprus and asked whether more could be done, in particular as far as the number of troops deployed on Cyprus were concerned. Mr. Richard HOWITT spoke highly of the reception of Hamas by the Turkish government and asked whether Turkey could play a stronger role in relation to Hamas. He also congratulated the government on the restraint it showed in reaction to PKK terrorism, but deplored the lack of progress in the area of Kurdish rights. Mr Vural ÖGER was interested in the cooperation of Turkey with the new ten EU Member States, potential strong advocates of Turkish accession. Secondly, he wanted to know whether Turkey had a strategy concerning the Turkish minorities in EU Member States. The questions of Mr Andrew DUFF were aimed to learn the timetable of the constitutional reform and to hear the Minister's opinion on the possible closure of the DTP. Mr Nils LUNDGREN inquired for the strategy of the government to strengthen the loyalty of the Kurdish population to the Republic while terrorism had to be fought. Mrs Eleni KOPPA focused her intervention on rights of and protection for religious minorities in Turkey. Limited by time constraints Minister BABACAN managed to answer only a part of the questions. On the issue of Article 301 he made clear that given the loud voices from PV/721908EN.doc 3 PE 406.738 within the EU who put Turkish accession into question and given that there was no clear accession timetable, any pressures from outside introduced rather additional obstacles for reform. Concerning Turkish troops on Cyprus he explained that their decrease could be part of settlement negotiations; unilateral withdrawal could not be expected. After the minister had left, the session continued with introductory remarks of Mr Yasar YAKIS, Co-chairman of the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee, who underlined the role of the JPC as facilitator of the Turkish accession to the EU. Therefore he reminded the Members of the agreement reached by the Bureau to pursue a constructive dialogue and not to give space to unconstructive criticism of partners. He appreciated the contribution made by the European Parliament to the Lisbon Treaty, which helped make the EU-Enlargement possible again. The Turkish side intended also to carry on the reform with determination and to contribute with its accession to the enhancement of the political and economic profile of the EU. However, the EU had to prove that it was not an introverted club based on cultural values. Mr Joost LAGENDIJK started with sharing his belief that Members came together to get to know each other better and not to convince each other. He continued with comments on the key political issues in current EU-Turkey relations: Turkey was expected to pursue the reform process as there was no excuse any more for delaying it. He assured the Turkish partners that a huge majority of the European Parliament condemned the PKK terrorism and understood that Turkey had to defend itself. However, no disproportionate military violence must be used. He appreciated the declaration of Prime Minister Erdogan that closing the DTP would be of no solution and stressed the importance of involving the Kurdish population into the political process. At the same time he made clear that the DTP had to distance itself from the PKK. The round of opening remarks continued with the contribution of Mr José Manuel de CARVALHO LAMEIRAS, Ambassador of Portugal on behalf of the Presidency-in- Office of the EU Council, who presented a picture of the recent developments in the negotiation process and summarised the key findings of the Commission regular report as far as expected reforms were concerned. He also appealed to the Turkish side to search for a broad national consensus on the constitutional reform. Mr Marc PIERINI, Head of the Delegation of the European Commission in Ankara, addressed the committee on behalf of the Commission. He elaborated on the implications of the recent Commission regular report and presented an overview of the assistance implemented in Turkey under the Pre-accession Instrument. In reaction to doubts expressed by several Turkish speakers concerning the final goal of the process and voices from within the EU putting this goal into question the Ambassador reminded the audience that the binding base of the process was the Negotiating Framework, clearly aimed at Turkish EU accession.
Recommended publications
  • Fostering the Dialogue Between Citizens, Civil Society Organisations, National and European Institutions
    European Commission DG – Communication Europe for Citizens Programme Fostering the Dialogue between Citizens, Civil Society Organisations, National and European Institutions. An Introduction to the European Year of Voluntary Activities promoting Active Citizenship European Year of Volunteering Rome: Quintilia Edizioni, 2011 ISBN: 88-900304-2-9 © ECP – Europe for Citizens Point Italy, 2011 Reproduction is authorized provided the source is acknowledged. This publication is co-financed by the European Commission. Printed in Italy European Year of Volunteering Fostering the Dialogue between Citizens, Civil Society Organisations, National and European Institutions. An Introduction to the European Year of Voluntary Activities promoting Active Citizenship. Edited by: Leila Nista - Rita Sassu Prefaces by: Patrizio Fondi Diplomatic Adviser, Ministry for Cultural Heritage and Activities Italy Gianni Bonazzi General Director, Service I, General Secretariat, Ministry for Cultural Heritage and Activities Italy Authors: Gianni Alemanno, Mayor of Rome Sophie Beernaerts, European Commission Gabriella Civico, European Year of Volunteering Alliance Silvia Costa, European Parliament Anna Cozzoli, European Commission, EACEA Emilio Dalmonte, European Commission Representation in Italy Paolo Di Caro, National Youth Agency Italy John Macdonald, European Commission Ramon Magi, Eurodesk Italy Leila Nista, Ministry for Cultural Heritage and Activities Italy Sabina Polidori, Ministry of Labour and Social Policies Italy Rita Sassu, ECP – Europe for Citizens Point
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Dissertation
    VU Research Portal Impressions of European Integration 't Lam, P.A. 2012 document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in VU Research Portal citation for published version (APA) 't Lam, P. A. (2012). Impressions of European Integration: A comparative analysis of the impact of EU news in European newspapers on European audiences. BOXPress. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. E-mail address: [email protected] Download date: 26. Sep. 2021 IMPRESSIONS OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION A comparative analysis of the impact of EU news in European newspapers on European audiences Peter ’t Lam VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT Impressions of European Integration A comparative analysis of the impact of EU news in European newspapers on European audiences ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad Doctor aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, op gezag van de rector magnificus prof.dr.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ««« « « « « 1999 « « 2004 ««« Session document FINAL A5-0332/2001 11 October 2001 REPORT on the progress achieved in the implementation of the common foreign and security policy (C5-0194/2001 – 2001/2007(INI)) Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy Rapporteur: Elmar Brok RR\451563EN.doc PE 302.047 EN EN PE 302.047 2/18 RR\451563EN.doc EN CONTENTS Page PROCEDURAL PAGE ..............................................................................................................4 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION .............................................................................................5 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT............................................................................................11 RR\451563EN.doc 3/18 PE 302.047 EN PROCEDURAL PAGE At the sitting of 18 January 2001 the President of Parliament announced that the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy had been authorised to draw up an own-initiative report, pursuant to Rule 163 of the Rules of Procedure and with a view to the annual debate pursuant to Article 21 of the EU Treaty, on the progress achieved in the implementation of the common foreign and security policy). By letter of 4 May 2001 the Council forwarded to Parliament its annual report on the main aspects and basic choices of the CFSP, including the financial implications for the general budget of the European Communities; this document was submitted to Parliament pursuant to point H, paragraph 40, of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 (7853/2001 – 2001/2007(INI)). At the sitting of 14 May 2001 the President of Parliament announced that she had referred this document to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy as the committee responsible (C5-0194/2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Future Energy Systems in Europe
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Science and Technology Options Assessment S T O A FUTURE ENERGY SYSTEMS IN EUROPE STUDY (IP/A/STOA/FWC-2005-28/SC20) IP/A/STOA/2008-01 PE 416.243 DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT A: ECONOMIC AND SCIENTIFIC POLICY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OPTIONS ASSESSMENT FUTURE ENERGY SYSTEMS IN EUROPE STUDY Abstract The European energy sector faces critical challenges in the future. In order to shed light on different pathways towards achieving these goals a number of energy scenarios for the EU27 have been developed within this project. The focus of the scenario building procedure is on the overall energy system, showing how the different elements of the European energy systems interact with each other, and how different combinations of technology choices and policies lead to different overall results. The project explores two essentially different developments of the European energy systems through a so-called Small-tech scenario and a Big-tech scenario. Both scenarios aim at achieving two concrete goals for 2030: reducing CO2 emissions by 50 per cent compared to the 1990 level, and reducing oil consumption by 50 per cent compared to the present level. Among the project recommendations are saving energy (as being less expensive than producing energy), stimulate the development of district heating and district cooling grids to facilitate the utilization of waste heat, large-scale integration of variable renewable energy sources, strengthening and coordinating the European electricity infrastructure, three levels of transformation needed in the transport sector (fuel efficiency, introduction of electric vehicles and modal-change, new resources (the sustainable European biomass for energy purposes, municipal waste).
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Whom Does the European Parliament Represent?
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) The European Parliament’s quest for representative autonomy: An internal perspective Buitenweg, K.M. Publication date 2016 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Buitenweg, K. M. (2016). The European Parliament’s quest for representative autonomy: An internal perspective. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:26 Sep 2021 1. Whom Does the European Parliament Represent? The origin of this study is the controversial judgment of the German Federal Con- stitutional Court (GFCC) regarding the Lisbon Treaty.1 It was handed down on Tuesday, 30 June 2009, just weeks before the end of my second (and final) term as a member of the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Deadlock? Perspectives on Future EU Enlargement
    Beyond the deadlock? Perspectives on future EU enlargement E-publication edited Joost Lagendijk and Jan Marinus Wiersma Clingendael Institute, The Hague, 2012 © Clingendael Institute Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’ Clingendael 7 2597 VH The Hague P.O. Box 93080 2509 AB The Hague Phone: + 31-70-3141950 Telefax: + 31-70-3141960 Email: [email protected] Website: www.clingendael.nl © Clingendael Institute Note of the Editors The Netherlands Institute for International Relations Clingendael hosted a one-day seminar on the future of EU enlargement on the 29th of November 2011. The event was chaired by Joost Lagendijk, Senior Advisor Istanbul Policy Center, and Jan Marinus Wiersma, Senior Visiting Fellow Clingendael. As the title of the conference – Beyond the deadlock? Perspectives on future EU enlargement – indicates, the debate concentrated on the differences between the accession rounds of 2004 and 2007 en the one that is now under way. Both the EU and the (potential) candidate countries operate in a different context that is marked by a much stricter conditionality of the EU which has a negative impact on the speed of the enlargement process. The countries in question, with the possible exception of Iceland, are confronted with internal opposition to the EU, sometimes show a lack of reform mindedness and have difficulty coping with political obstacles like the Cyprus issue in the case of Turkey or the Kosovo question. The agenda of the seminar consisted of three main topics: lessons learned from past accessions, the cases of Turkey and Macedonia, and the future of enlargement. They are being dealt with in this publication from different angles.
    [Show full text]
  • Building the European Federation of Public Service Unions the History – 2016) of EPSU (1978 Carola Fischbach-Pyttel
    European Trade Union Institute Bd du Roi Albert II, 5 1210 Brussels Belgium +32 (0)2 224 04 70 [email protected] www.etui.org Building The European Federation of Public Service Unions will celebrate its 40th anniversary in 2018. the European Federation It is better known as “EPSU” (the “European Public Service Union”), a name that represents both the organisation’s mission statement and a key future ambition. of Public Service Unions This book retraces the development of EPSU, beginning with its early days as the European Public Services Committee (EPSC). The EPSC was set up as an ETUC liaison committee encompassing two organisations. It soon became obvious that this “marriage of convenience” The history of EPSU (1978 – 2016) between the organisations involved was a mismatch, and it came to an end in 1994 through a decision by the EPSC Presidium which was then formalised at the fifth General Assembly in — Vienna in 1996. The organisation was from then on to be called the European Federation of Carola Fischbach-Pyttel Public Service Unions (EPSU). The book also looks at the difficult development of the sectoral social dialogue in the public services sector and describes the problems that had to be overcome in this process. A constant challenge in EPSU’s work has been the various waves of public service liberalisation, ranging from public procurement and the Services Directive to the European energy market and, recently, the negotiation of various international trade deals. All these issues raise questions about the power relations that determine
    [Show full text]
  • Tilburg University Babel Debates Szabo, Peter
    Tilburg University Babel Debates Szabo, Peter Publication date: 2021 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in Tilburg University Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Szabo, P. (2021). Babel Debates: An ethnographic language policy study of EU Multilingualism in the European Parliament. [s.n.]. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 26. sep. 2021 Babel Debates An ethnographic language policy study of EU Multilingualism in the European Parliament To the memory of Jan Blommaert Babel Debates An ethnographic language policy study of EU Multilingualism in the European Parliament PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan Tilburg University, op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof. dr. W.B.H.J. van de Donk, in het openbaar te verdedigen ten overstaan van een door het college voor promoties aangewezen commissie in de Aula van de Universiteit op vrijdag 26 februari 2021 om 13.30 uur door Péter Károly Szabó geboren te Boedapest, Hongarije Promotores: prof.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2004 2009 Session document FINAL A6-9999/2006 20.12.2006 REPORT on corporate social responsibility: a new partnership (2006/2133(INI)) Committee on Employment and Social Affairs Rapporteur: Richard Howitt RR\380802EN.doc PE 380.802v02-00 EN EN PR_INI CONTENTS Page MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION ............................................ 3 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT............................................................................................ 17 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, RESEARCH AND ENERGY............ 21 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND GENDER EQUALITY 24 PROCEDURE .......................................................................................................................... 27 PE 380.802v02-00 2/2 RR\380802EN.doc EN MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION on corporate social responsibility: a new partnership (2006/2133(INI)) The European Parliament, – having regard to the two most authoritative internationally agreed standards for corporate conduct: the International Labour Organization's Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy and the OECD's "Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises", and to codes of conduct agreed under the aegis of international organisations such as the FAO, the World Health Organization and the World Bank and efforts under the auspices of UNCTAD with regard to the activities of enterprises in developing countries, – having regard to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 RGD Speakers
    Norbert Teufelberger, Chairman of EGBA, Co-Chief Executive Officer, bwin Norbert Teufelberger was born in 1965 and graduated from Vienna University of Economics with a degree in social science and economics. His work experience in the international casino industry goes back to 1989, when he joined Casinos Austria AG, Vienna, as assistant to the head of the Foreign Business Division. In 1992 he was appointed head of the International Finance and Controlling Department. At the end of 1992, after working for two months as a consultant to the Novomatic Group, Gumpoldskirchen, he founded Century Casinos, Inc., Cripple Creek, Colorado, together with former colleagues, serving as the company’s sole finance director and a member of the board until September 1999. The company was listed on NASDAQ in 1996. On 19 January 2000, he was appointed to the Management Board with responsibility for finance and investor relations. In June 2001 he was appointed Co-CEO and also assumed responsibility for the operational business and all gaming activities. Christofer Fjellner, Member of the European Parliament, EPP-ED, Sweden Christofer Fjellner is Member of the European Parliament. He is Member of the Committee of International Trade, Member of the Committee of Budget Control, Supplementary Member of the Committee of Environment and Public Health, Member of the Parliamentary Delegation to Belarus and Supplementary Member of the Parliamentary Delegation to Iran. He is also Member of the executive board of Moderaterna (the Swedish conservatives) and Vice-President of Look Closer AB (a business intelligence company that he co-founded in 2000). From 2002 to 2004, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Voice of the People Manuscript EU and the Enlargement with Answers from Politicians at the Parliament TVSYD, Brussels
    Voice of the People Manuscript EU and the Enlargement With answers from politicians at the Parliament TVSYD, Brussels Crew: Journalist: Lene Krüger Camera: Mohsen Safarkhanlou Editing: Kurt Nielsen Banke Duration: 4’50 Music: Translation EU and the Enlargement With answers from politicians at the Parliament TVSYD, Brussels 0’’02 Poul Bodholdt, Blacksmith, Denmark “What countries are in? This is actually the only thing I would like to ask about” 0’06 SIGN: Cyprus, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Czech Republic and Hungary will become members of the European Union the 1st May 2004 0’19 Graham Watson, Member of the Parliament, UK We have ten countries joining the European Union. It sounds like a lot, but in reality it’s not a bigger expansion than when Denmark, GB and Ireland joined the Union back in 1970ties. We are increasing our land area by 35%, but our population will grow with under a quarter. It’s not too much to digest. But clearly what it does is to provide opportunities for the present citizens of the European Union to visit those countries, to do business there, to travel much more easily across a much wider area. I already know of people from Denmark buying holyday homes in Estonia. This is the kind of development, that enlarging the Union allows for 1’20 Joost Lagendijk, Member of the Parliament, Netherlands Eight of those 10 countries belong to the former Soviet block. And after 1989 after the fall of the wall we said to them, you’re welcome with us. The EU is not only the Western Europe; it’s the whole of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • 9640-MSA Annual Report 05 A
    www.msa.org.mt Malta Standards Authority ANNUAL REPORT 2005-06 Malta Standards Authority Evans Buildings, Second Floor, Merchants Street, Valletta, VLT10 Tel: 2124 2420 Fax: 2124 2406 Email: [email protected] designed by JP Advertising Ltd JP Advertising designed by ANNUAL REPORT 2005-06 Mission Statement Our mission is to effectively co-ordinate standardization and related activities to meet the needs of the Maltese community in accordance with European and internationally recognized standards and practices, that enhance economic efficiency and international competitiveness, and fulfil the community’s demand for consumer protection and for a safe and sustainable environment. 02 Message by the Minister for Competitiveness and Communications 03 Message from the Chairman 06 Council of the Malta Standards Authority Table of 07 Message from the Chief Executive Officer 09 Accreditation Directorate Contents 12 Consumer and Industrial Goods Directorate 15 Foodstuffs, Chemicals and Cosmetics Directorate 17 Metrology Directorate 19 Standardization Directorate 21 Financial Statements Malta Standards Authority 01 www.msa.org.mt Message by the Minister for Competitiveness and Communications Hon. Censu Galea Year after year, the Malta Standards Authority increases its All of the above correspond to one of the Government’s key significance within the Ministry for Competitiveness and strategic documents, the National Reform Programme (NRP), Communications. International standards have been instrumental through which the country’s socio-economic development in the development of telecommunication networks, creating challenges, as well as Malta’s national competitiveness in terms more opportunities for small businesses. This is obviously of the relaunched Lisbon Strategy are addressed. The NRP reflected at the national level where the importance of standards aims to further promote enterprise and industry; tourism; and and their recognition is constantly increasing.
    [Show full text]