The Relationship Between Gallbladder Motility and the Presence of Enterogastric Reflux
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Nuclear Medicine Review 2002 Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 25–28 Copyright © 2002 Via Medica ISSN 1506–9680 Original The relationship between gallbladder motility and the presence of enterogastric reflux values (p < 0.05) are obtained in AGB than in IGB and FGB. Vera M. Artiko1, Hamzeh Chebib1, Nebojša Petrović1, Also, these values were in correlation with the functional status Milorad Petrović2, Predrag Peško2, Wladimir Y. Ussov3, of the GB (r = 0.284, p < 0.05). Vladimir Obradović1 CONCLUSIONS: We can conclude that EGR occurs more fre- 1 Institute for Nuclear Medicine, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, Yugoslavia quently in the patients with afunctional GB in comparison with 2 Institute for Digestive Diseases, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, those with functional and decreased motor function. Also, EGR Yugoslavia quantity is in correlation with the impairment of the GB function. 3 Laboratory for Tomography and Magnetic Resonance, University of Tomsk, Russia Key words: gallbladder motility, enterogastric reflux, hepatobiliary scintigraphy Abstract Introduction BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was an estimation of the Patients with chronic cholecystitis and those after cholecystec- relation between the gallbladder (GB) motility function and the tomy suffer very often from dyspepsia with flatulence, belching, vom- presence and quantity of enterogastric reflux (EGR). iting and epigastric pain. These can be attributed to the enterogas- MATERIAL AND METHODS: We investigated 172 patients: 90 tric reflux (EGR) caused by impaired pyloric function, continuous flow with physiological GB function (filling and emptying) (FGB), 21 of bile into the duodenum [1, 2] or impaired duodenal motility. with impaired GB function (prolonged filling and ejection frac- In the physiological condition, the interdigestive motility of the tion < 45%) and 61 with afunctional gallbladder (AGB) (without gallbladder, duodenum and antrum is co-ordinated by the cyclic visualisation). motor activity of the interdigestive mioelectric complex, while chole- The study was performed during 90 min (1 f/min) after i.v. appli- cystokinin (CCK) and parasympathetic stimulation regulate the cation of 185 MBq 99m Tc-dietil IDA. After 30 min, a test meal digestive and interdigestive contractility of the gallbladder (GB) was given while at the end the stomach was marked. Accord- [3]. In the patients with cholecystitis or after cholecystectomy the ing to the parameters from time activity curves over the stom- release of bile into the duodenum becomes continuous because ach and hepatobiliary system, the index of EGR was calculat- of the lack of the gallbladder reservoir function. The bile concen- ed, while GB filling and ejection fraction were estimated from tration function of the gallbladder is also lacking. This enables the GB time/activity curve. more bile to inflow and accumulate in the duodenum [4, 5]. Also, RESULTS: Most frequently, EGR occurs in AGB (47.5%), fol- the bile inflow is changed because of the impaired motility [6]. In lowed by IGB (43%) and FGB (41%), without significant differ- addition, the contractility of the pylorus in response to CCK stimu- ences (p > 0.05). The significantly (p < 0.05) highest value of EGR was obtained in the patients with AGB in comparison to lation is decreased after cholecystectomy [7]. IGB and FGB. EGR values were in correlation (r = 0.168, The aim of the study is an estimation of the relationship between p < 0.05) with the functional status of the GB. In the patients the functional status of the gallbladder and enterogastric reflux. with pathological values of EGR (> 10%), significantly higher Material and methods Correspondence to: Prof. Dr Vladimir Obradović In order to estimate the relationship between gallbladder func- Institute for Nuclear Medicine Clinical Centre of Serbia tion and both frequency and quantity of EGR, scintigraphic exam- Višegradska 26, 11 000 Belgrade, Yugoslavia ination of gallbladder motility and EGR were performed simulta- Tel: (+381) 11 361 5641, e-mail: [email protected] neously in 172 patients. www.nmr.viamedica.pl 25 Original Nuclear Medicine Review 2002, Vol. 5, No. 1 According to the GB motility, patients were divided into three groups: 1) those with physiological GB function (FGB, n = 90), in which the GB was well visualised with physiological filling and emptying (EF > 45%); 2) with impaired GB function (IGB, n = 21) reflected in prolonged filling and decreased ejection fraction (EF < 45%); and 3) with afunctional gallbladder (AGB, n = 61) without visualisation, including patients after cholecystectomy. The obtained results were evaluated by descriptive and ana- lytical statistical methods: mean value (X), standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV%) and median (Med), analysis of vari- ance, Kruskal Wallis’ and Multiple range tests, as well as Pearson EGR% = (S – S )/(H – H ) × 100 t 0 0 t linear correlation. Figure 1. Estimation of the index of enterogastric reflux. S0 — activity in the gastric region immediately after test meal (31 min); S — maximal ac- t Results tivity in the stomach region; H0 — activity in the hepatobiliary region im- mediately after test meal; H — activity in the hepatobiliary region at the t Values of EGR less than 10% were considered physiological time corresponding to the maximal activity in the gastric region. [8, 9]. EGR occurred most frequently in AGB (47.5%), followed by All patients underwent 90 min (1f/min) dynamic gamma cam- IGB (43%) and FGB (41%), without significant differences (p > 0.05) era acquisition, which started immediately after the intravenous (Table 1). injection of 185 MBq 99m Tc-dietil IDA. Thirty minutes post injec- Taking into account all the examinees (those with abnormal tion, the test meal (250 ml of milk, one egg, sugar) was given in as well as those with normal values of EGR), the highest value of order to provoke gallbladder contraction. In the last two minutes EGR was obtained in the patients with AGB (19.2 ± 29.0%), fol- of the study the patient was given 18 MBq of 99mTc pertechne- lowed by those with IGB (13.0 ± 14.8%) and FGB (11.5 ± 14.2%) tate per os, to mark the stomach region. (Table 2). At first, analysis of sequential scintigrams was performed, in Statistical analysis (Kruskal-Wallis test and analysis of vari- order to evaluate the flow of the radiopharmaceutical through the ance) (Table 3) did not show significant differences (p > 0.05) hepatobiliary system (gallbladder and bile ducts) and duodenum, between the mentioned groups, while the Multiple range test (Table 4) as well as retrograde flow to the stomach. Time activity curves from showed significant differences (p < 0.05) in the EGR values be- the hepatobiliary system, stomach and gallbadder regions of inter- est, respectively, were generated. The following parameters were Table 1. Frequency of the pathological reflux in all the patients in comparison to the functional gallbladder condition derived from the curves: S0 — activity in the stomach after inges- tion of the test meal; S — maximal retrograde activity in the same t Number of Gallbladder EGR Frequency region; H — activity in the hepatobiliary system the moment after 0 patients condition the test meal ingestion, and Ht — activity in the same region at the moment of the maximal retrograde activity in the stomach. 90 FGB 37 41% 21 IGB 9 43% The index of EGR was calculated according to the equation: 61 AGB 29 47.5% 100 × (S – S )/(H – H ) (Fig. 1). The number of EGR episodes t 0 0 t Total 172 75 during the study was also determined. GB ejection fraction was c2 = 0.618, DF = 2, p > 0.05 calculated according to the formula: EF% = 100 x (Amax – Amin)/ /A , where A is maximal activity in the gallbladder at the mo- max max Table 2. Descriptive statistical parameters of EGR index in all pa- ment of test meal ingestion and Amin minimal activity in the gall- tients considering functional gallbladder condition bladder as a result of the stimulation (Fig. 2). Number of Gallbladder patients conditionx (EGR%) (SD) (CV%) Med 90 FGB 11.5 14.2 123.5 9.00 21 IGB 13.0 14.8 113.8 10.00 61 AGB 19.2 29.04 151.2 9.00 Total 172 c2 = 0.5, DF = 2, p > 0.05, FGB — normal function of the gallbladder, IGB — impaired gallbladder function, AGB — afunctional gallbladder Table 3. Significance of the EGR differences in all the patients considering functional gallbladder condition Source of variability DF F Significance EF% = 100 × (Amax – Amin)/Amax Between the groups 2 2.58 p > 0.05 Figure 2. Estimation of the gallbladder ejection fraction. A — activity max Inside the groups 169 immediately after meal stimulation; A — activity at the end of the gall- min Total 171 bladder contraction. 26 www.nmr.viamedica.pl Original Vera M. Artiko et al., The relationship between gallbladder motility and the presence of enterogastric reflux Table 4. Significance of the differences of the EGR index between the groups Compared groups Significance AGB/(FGB, IGB) p < 0.05 IGB/FGB p > 0.05 Table 5. Descriptive statistical parameters of the EGR values in patients with pathological values in comparison to the functional condition of the gallbladder Number Gallbladder (EGR%) (SD) (CV%) Med of patients condition Figure 4. Correlation between the functional condition of the GB and 37 FGB 24.10 14.13 58.63 20.00 EGR values in the patients with pathological values. 9 IGB 25.11 15.07 60.01 22.00 29 AGB 38.72 32.35 83.54 28.00 Total 75 Discussion c2 = 0.66, DF = 2, p > 0.05, FGB — normal function of the gallbladder, IGB — impaired gallbladder function, AGB — afunctional gallbladder Our results indicate that bile reflux mostly occurs in the pa- tients with afunctional gallbladder, followed by those with impaired gallbladder function while it is most rare in the subjects with phys- Table 6.