DOCSLIB.ORG

International Conference on Engaging Non-State Actors in a Landmine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
International Conference on Engaging Non-State Actors in a Landmine Engaging Non-State Actors in a Landmine Ban a pioneering conference FULL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS Geneva 24th and 25th March 2000 International Conference Centre of Geneva CICG Geneva Hosted by the Swiss Campaign to Ban Landmines in cooperation with the members of the Colombian Campaign to Ban Landmines, Mines Action Canada, the Philippine Campaign to Ban Landmines, the UK Working Group on Landmines and the Zimbabwean Campaign to Ban Landmines Permanent secretariat Swiss CBL Elisabeth Reusse-Decrey Pl. Mairie 4 CH 1256 Troinex - Geneva CH Phone + 41 22. 328.01.73 Fax + 41 22. 328.01.73 e-mail [email protected] Secretariat during the conference M. Cyril von Maydell Av. Trembley 14 1209 Geneva - CH Phone + 41 22. 734. 54. 84 Fax + 41 22. 734. 61. 48 e-mail [email protected] Published by the Conference Organizers 2001 Quezon City, Philippines design sadidaya disenyo layout itemplo/east axis creative cover artwork Christopher C. Ku cover layout karissa villa/east axis creative contents List of Acronyms vii Introduction 1 1 Opening Words 11 Conference Rationale and Objectives 11 The Role of Geneva 13 2 Framing the Problem 17 A Global Look at Non-state Armed Actors 17 One Man’s Terrorist is Another Man’s Liberator 20 Minefields and Non-state Actors 27 Discussion: Supply and Demand; Peacebuilding 30 3 Legal and Normative Frameworks 33 Overview of Legal and Normative Frameworks 33 International Humanitarian Law and the Public Conscience 40 The ‘Dynamic Approach’ to Public International Law 43 Discussion: Defining NSAs and Other Issues 49 4 Views from the Ground 55 Working with NSAs in Burma 55 Mines in the Caucasus 59 Mines in the context of the Zapatista struggle in Chiapas/Mexico 61 Situation of Guatemala in a Central American Context 63 On Mines in Colombia 67 Conflict Transformation in Northern Ireland 69 Mine Action in Southern Sudan 72 Difficulties in Addressing Landmines in Palestine 77 Challenges in Engaging the LTTE (Sri Lanka) 79 iii 5 NSA Perspectives 81 Former Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA or UCK) (Kosovo/former Yugoslavia) 81 Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) (Northern Kurdistan/Turkey) 82 Moro-Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) (Philippines) 83 Polisario Front (Western Sahara/Morocco) 85 Rebolusyonaryong Partido ng Manggagawa-Pilipinas and the Revolutionary Proletarian Army-Alex Boncayao Brigade (RPM-P/RPA-ABB) (Philippines) 86 Sudan People’s Liberation Army/Movement (SPLA/M) (Sudan) 89 6State Perspectives 93 New Approaches to NSAs93 Statements by Governments 96 Discussion: Confidence-building, which landmines to ban, and targeting sanctions 99 7Engaging NSAs in Integrated Mine Action 105 Integrated Mine Action 105 Victim Assistance 106 Clearing the Way to Peace 107 Community Rehabilitation 111 8 Developing Approaches 117 Principles of Engagement 117 Tools for Engagement 125 Overview of Tools of Engagement 127 The Law: A Tool to Engage Non-state Actors 130 NSAs and the Ottawa Treaty 135 Geneva Call 137 iv contents Monitoring and supporting implementation 143 Draft Guidelines 152 9 Recommendations from Conference Organisers 157 10 Closing Words 161 Annexes 1 Selected statements by NSAs 163 Taliban Declaration 163 Moro Islamic Liberation Front Regulations 165 Kurdistan Workers’ Party Statement 165 2 Bibliography 169 3 March Conference 171 Programme 171 Workshop Process 174 List of Participants 177 Feedback 182 Contact Information 184 Acknowledgments 185 contents v list of acronyms ANC African National Congress APM Anti-personnel mines ATM Anti-tank mines CCW 1980 UN Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons CPP Communist Party of the Philippines DRC Democratic Republic of the Congo ELN National Liberation Army – Colombia EPL Ejercito Popular Liberacion EU European Union EZLN Ejercito Zapatista de Liberacion Nacional FARC Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia FMLN Frente Farabundo Marti de Liberacion Nacional GATT General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade HR Human rights ICBL International Campaign to Ban Landmines ICRC International Committee of the Red Cross ICSID International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes IEA Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan (the Taliban) IHL International Humanitarian Law IRA Irish Republican Army ISCE Inter-sessional Standing Committees of Experts KDP Kurdistan Democratic Party – Iraq (also PDK) KLA Kosovo Liberation Army (also UCK) KNLA Karen National Liberation Army (Burma) KPC Kosovo Protection Corps (KPC), successor to KLA in Kosovo LT TE Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (Sri Lanka) M-19 Movimiento 19 de Abril MILF Moro Islamic Liberation Front (Philippines) ML Umkhonto we Sizwe, military wing of the ANC MOU Memorandum of Understanding vii NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organisation NGO Non-governmental organisation NPA Norwegian People’s Aid NSA Non-state actor OAS Organization of American States OAU Organisation of African Unity OLS Operation Lifeline Sudan ONUSAL Mision de la Organicacion Naciones Unidas para El Salvador OSIL-Sudan Operation Save Innocent Lives – Sudan PDF Popular Defence Forces, paramilitaries in Sudan PKK Kurdistan Workers’ Party (Turkey) PLO Palestinian Liberation Organisation PNA Palestinian National Authority POW Prisoner of War PRI Partido Revolucionario Institucional PUK Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (Iraq) RPM-P/RPA-ABB Rebolusyonaryong Partido ng Manggagawa-Pilipinas and the Revolutionary Proletarian Army-Alex Boncayao Brigade (Philippines) SPLA/M Sudan People’s Liberation Army/Movement SPM Somali Patriotic Movement SWAPO South West Africa People’s Organisation (Namibia) TMK Kosovo Protection Corps (Albanian acronym), successor to KLA in Kosovo UCK Kosovo Liberation Army (Albanian acronym) UN United Nations UNDHA United Nations Department for Humanitarian Affairs UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund URNG Unidad Revolucionaria Nacional de Guatemala UXO Unexploded Ordnance WFP World Food Programme WTO World Trade Organisation viii acronyms introduction Mary Foster Conference Proceedings Editor In March 2000, about 120 people from over 30 countries gathered in Geneva to discuss ways of engaging armed opposition groups, called “non- state actors”, in the effort to eradicate landmines. Remarkably, the partici- pants included not only academics, activists and representatives of NGOs, but also representatives of both governments and non-state actors themselves. What pulled this disparate group together was concern for the people living on mined land under non-state control or injured by landmines pro- duced, used, stockpiled and traded by non-state actors. why engage non-state actors? The conference consolidated opinion — from point of view of states, NSAs, and NGOs — that the NSA element of the landmine crisis needs to be addressed in a concerted fashion. It is clear that the effort to ban landmines must, sooner or later, address non-state as well as state use of mines. Indeed, as one of the speakers pointed out, it has necessarily been doing so in a quiet way from the very beginning of the international initiative. While binding governments to the 1997 Ottawa Treaty 1 will certainly advance the goal of eradicating anti-personnel landmines, this is a limited strategy. It will never be sufficient while non-state actors continue to be part of the landmine equation. What makes this difficult to see is the still overwhelming focus on the state in dominant discourses and institutions of global relations. It is neces- sary to remind ourselves that, around the world, close to 200 armed entities, many with land and populations under their sway, stand outside the inter- state system. Dozens of these are directly involved in the landmine problem; 1 along with states, they are manufacturing, trading, selling and using landmines and controlling areas of land where people are living with landmines. The practical implication for anyone wishing to alleviate the suffering caused by landmines is that strategies to engage non-state actors, comple- menting strategies aimed at states, must be developed. defining mines “Landmine” has proven difficult to define. The difficulties have as much to do with politics as technicalities, reflecting differences in attitudes towards militarism and even the nature of political change. The definition in the Ot- tawa Treaty has been criticised for not capturing claymore-type mines2 and certain anti-tank mines which can function as person-activated weapons3 . In contrast, broader, function-oriented definitions, as formulated in the “Bad Honnef Framework4 ,” for example, attempt to capture all weapons which can, in practise, be activated by individuals, not just those designed to do so. The Bad Honnef definition has in turn been questioned for its failure to encom- pass all anti-tank mines, which also create problems for civilians, relief ef- forts and post-war recovery. Most Ottawa Treaty countries have accepted a ban on anti-personnel mines while supporting mine clearance programmes which address the whole range of explosive remnants of war. A few, like Italy, have gone further, ban- ning a much broader category of landmine. Non-state actor positions on landmines also reflect these debates: some are more concerned with anti-personnel mines as defined in the Ottawa Treaty; others, such as the Taliban, have gone further in statements they have made or, like the SPLA, in their mine clearance support. The problems posed by a wide range of mine-like weapons, including cluster bombs and anti-tank mines, were discussed at the conference. “Vic- tim-activated weapons” and the ICRC’s catch-all “explosive remnants of war” provided
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on Their Destruction
    The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction (Also known as the Ottawa Treaty, the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention and the Mine Ban Treaty) Canada’s ratification of the treaty through domestic legislation was registered upon signature, 3 December 1997. Adoption: The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction was first open for signature on 3 December 1997. The treaty came into effect on March 1, 1999, six months after forty ratifications were confirmed. Entry into force: 1 March 1999. Number of signatories and ratifications/accessions: As of June 2016, there are 164 State Parties to the Convention, (32 states have not signed and remain outside the treaty, one state (the Marshall Islands) has signed but not ratified. The ratification option closed on 1 March 1999 for states that did not sign by that date. States can still accede to (join) the Treaty. Summary Information The purpose of the convention is to eliminate the humanitarian impact of antipersonnel mines through prohibition of their use, possession, transfer and production. The treaty also obliges signatories to remove mines from the ground and to destroy stockpiles. History An international civil society campaign organized by the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL) was established in 1992 to advance progress towards a treaty banning landmines. While at first the ICBL was comprised of a handful of non- governmental organizations, it quickly grew to a campaign of more than two thousand groups from around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Dealing with the Crisis in Zimbabwe: the Role of Economics, Diplomacy, and Regionalism
    SMALL WARS JOURNAL smallwarsjournal.com Dealing with the Crisis in Zimbabwe: The Role of Economics, Diplomacy, and Regionalism Logan Cox and David A. Anderson Introduction Zimbabwe (formerly known as Rhodesia) shares a history common to most of Africa: years of colonization by a European power, followed by a war for independence and subsequent autocratic rule by a leader in that fight for independence. Zimbabwe is, however, unique in that it was once the most diverse and promising economy on the continent. In spite of its historical potential, today Zimbabwe ranks third worst in the world in “Indicators of Instability” leading the world in Human Flight, Uneven Development, and Economy, while ranking high in each of the remaining eight categories tracked (see figure below)1. Zimbabwe is experiencing a “brain drain” with the emigration of doctors, engineers, and agricultural experts, the professionals that are crucial to revitalizing the Zimbabwean economy2. If this was not enough, 2008 inflation was running at an annual rate of 231 million percent, with 80% of the population lives below the poverty line.3 Figure 1: Source: http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4350&page=0 1 Foreign Policy, “The Failed States Index 2008”, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4350&page=0, (accessed August 29, 2008). 2 The Fund for Peace, “Zimbabwe 2007.” The Fund for Peace. http://www.fundforpeace.org/web/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=280&Itemid=432 (accessed September 30, 2008). 3 BBC News, “Zimbabwean bank issues new notes,” British Broadcasting Company. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7642046.stm (accessed October 3, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • 1997 Convention on the Prohibition of Anti-Personnel Mines and on Their Destruction
    ADVISORY SERVICE ON INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW ____________________________________ 1997 Convention on the Prohibition of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-personnel Mines and on their Destruction ("the Ottawa treaty") is part of the international response to the widespread suffering caused by anti-personnel mines. The Convention is based on customary rules of international humanitarian law applicable. to all States. These rules prohibit the use of weapons which by their very nature do not discriminate between civilians and combatants or which cause unnecessary suffering or superfluous injury. The Convention was opened for signature in Ottawa on 3 December 1997 and entered into force on 1 March 1999. Why a ban on anti-personnel Which mines are affected by this the entry into force. Pending such mines? treaty? destruction, every effort must be made to identify mined areas and to Anti-personnel mines cannot Anti-personnel mines are designed have them marked, monitored and distinguish between soldiers and to be placed on or near the ground protected by fencing or other means civilians and usually kill or severely and to be "detonated by the to ensure the exclusion of civilians. mutilate their victims. Relatively presence, proximity or contact of a If a State cannot complete the cheap, small and easy to use, they person". It was the understanding of destruction of emplaced mines have proliferated by the tens of the negotiators that "improvised" within 10 years it may request a millions, inflicting untold suffering devices produced by adapting other meeting of the States Parties to and wreaking social and economic munitions to function as anti- extend the deadline and to assist it havoc in dozens of countries personnel mines were also banned in fulfilling this obligation.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Criteria & Conditions for Engaging Armed Non
    Exploring Criteria & Conditions for Engaging Armed Non-State Actors to Respect Humanitarian Law & Human Rights Law Conference Report - Geneva, 4-5 June 2007 [Published, November 2008] Note The views expressed herein are the authors’ responsibility. They do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of Geneva Call, the Program for the Study of International Organization(s), or the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of an opinion on the part of Geneva Call, the Program for the Study of International Organization(s), or the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research concerning the legal status of any country, armed non-State actor, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Geneva Call is an international humanitarian organization dedicated to engaging armed non- State actors (NSAs)—armed groups and non-internationally recognized States—towards compliance with humanitarian norms. It was officially launched in 2000 by members of the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL). Since its creation, Geneva Call has focused on advocating the ban on anti-personnel mines to NSAs. It has been promoting an inclusive approach through the Deed of Commitment for Adherence to a Total Ban on Anti- Personnel Mines and for Cooperation on Mine Action (hereafter Deed of Commitment) which enables NSAs, that by definition cannot accede to the 1997 Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on Their Destruction (hereafter the Mine Ban Treaty), to subscribe to its norms.
    [Show full text]
  • Walking Together Or Divided Agenda? Comparing Landmines and Small-Arms Campaigns
    Walking Together or Divided Agenda? Comparing Landmines and Small-Arms Campaigns STEFAN BREM & KEN RUTHERFORD* Center for International Studies, Zurich, Switzerland, and Department of Political Science, Southwest Missouri State University, Springfield, MO, USA Introduction UST AS THE 19TH CENTURY closed with the 1899 Hague Peace Confer- ence, where 26 governments were represented, the 20th century ended with Jthe 1999 Hague Appeal for Peace (HAP) Conference, where the delegates represented more than 1,000 nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). The HAP Conference delegates took special pride in the entry into force on 1 March 1999 of the NGO-inspired Ottawa Treaty banning anti-personnel landmines (APMs). During the conference (11–15 May 1999), the International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) was launched, a coalition of interna- tional NGOs calling for the prevention of ‘proliferation and unlawful use of light weapons’.1 The IANSA and other NGO campaigns that started in The Hague held up the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL), a coali- tion of more than 1,300 NGOs from 70 countries, as an example of how to work with medium-sized states on security issues – even in opposition to ma- jor powers, such as the United States, China, and Russia. With the ICBL’s encouragement and support, the Canadian government and other pro-ban states called for the creation of a new regime, to be negotiated outside the consensus-based format of UN multilateral arms control fora. The main distinguishing features of the negotiations begun as a result of this were that they were guided by majority-voting procedures, and NGOs were welcome participants.
    [Show full text]
  • The Silent Menace: Landmines in Bosnia and Herzegovina
    The Silent Menace: Landmines in Bosnia and Herzegovina Document printed from older version the website of the ICRC. URL: http://www.icrc.org/Web/Eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/57JP32 International Committee of the Red Cross Archived page (may contain outdated information) 1-02-1998 The Silent Menace: Landmines in Bosnia and Herzegovina Here is a reproduction of the brochure, certain maps are missing, please refer to the printed version. Contents: Executive Summary I. Introduction II. Background (a) JNA doctrine (b) Mine-laying during the conflict (c) Types of mines used during the conflict (d) The use of improvised mines The use of mines during the conflict The rules of international humanitarian law governing the use of mines Mines and the peace settlement The current landmine problem in Bosnia and Herzegovina (a) The number of mines and mined areas (b) The location of minefields (c) Mapping (d) Demarcation (e) The use of mines since the advent of peace Conclusions III. The human impact Groups at risk (a) Vulnerable groups during the war (b) Vulnerable groups after the war (c) Trends and observations (d) The particular vulnerability of refugees Mine-laying to prevent returns Minority returns and the “Open Cities Initiative” The dilemma faced by UNHCR The psychological and socio-economic impact The victims of mines Conclusions IV. The impact of mines on living standards The cost in terms of health care (a) The health-care sector before the war (b) The health-care sector after the war (c) The impact of mine injuries on the health-care system as a whole The impact on agriculure The economic impact Conclusions V.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting of Signatories to Geneva Call's Deed of Commitment
    Report of the First Meeting of Signatories to Geneva Call’s Deed of Commitment TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................ 1 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... 2 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ......................................................................... 6 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 7 I. Implementation of the Deed of Commitment ...................................................... 13 II. Monitoring and Promoting the Deed of Commitment ...................................... 19 III. Expanding the Geneva Call Mechanism to other Humanitarian Norms ....... 25 IV. Mine Action and Peace Processes ...................................................................... 29 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 34 Annex I - Selection of Official Statements ............................................................... 38 Opening Address by Ambassador Thomas Greminger, Head of Political Affairs Division IV (Human Security), Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs ...... 38 Opening Address by El Ghassim Wane, Head of the Conflict Management Division, Peace and Security Department of the African Union ........................... 40 Opening Address by James W. Rawley,
    [Show full text]
  • Time to Change Course – Angola and the Ottawa Treaty
    ISSUE BRIEF TIME TO CHANGE COURSE Angola and The Ottawa Treaty April 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Twenty years ago, Diana Princess of Wales walked in Angola’s minefields. In doing so, she captured the conscience of states, civil society and the public. This helped inspire the final successful push to achieve the ground breaking Ottawa Treaty banning landmines in 1997. As a result, Angola holds an iconic status for the mine ban movement. It continues to symbolise the commitments and spirit of the treaty and its cause – to end, for all time, the suffering caused by anti-personnel landmines. As long as people live at risk and in daily fear from landmines, the cause and commitments of the Treaty must remain alive. Yet 20 years on, in spite of progress made, Angola’s minefields and the people who fear them risk being forgotten. The legacy of contamination remains a lasting blight on their lives. It is also an obstacle to Angola regaining sustainable agricultural productivity, a goal that is more important now than ever. The collapse of the Angolan oil-based economy means that agriculture must play an increasing role in building shared prosperity. There is an opportunity for change. With renewed commitment and support, international governments can help Angola be landmine free by 2025. It is an achievable goal that could release thousands of men, women and children from fear, and unlock enormous development potential in a country where poverty is still rife and misunderstood. CONTENTS Introduction....................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Civilians in Armed Conflict Through Humanitarian Engagement with Armed Non-State Actors
    Protecting Civilians in Armed Conflict through Humanitarian Engagement with Armed Non-State Actors © Gleb Garanich / Reuters Geneva Call | Appel de Genève P.O. Box 334 | CH-1211 Geneva 4| Switzerland Tel +41 22 879 10 50 | Fax +41 22 879 10 51 www.genevacall.org INTRODUCTION This strategy document sets out Geneva Call’s direction and priorities over the next three years. It builds on previous institutional strategies and Geneva Call’s long experience in engaging armed non-State actors towards compliance with international humanitarian norms. The document serves as an internal roadmap for Geneva Call to plan its work and to measure progress. It is also intended to inform Geneva Call’s external stakeholders, in particular donors and partners. CONTEXT FOR ENGAGEMENT Most armed conflicts today involve armed non- ANSA fighters, Democratic Republic of Congo ©Francesca Tosarelli State actors (ANSAs), either fighting Government forces or other ANSAs. Violations of international humanitarian law (IHL) are widespread during such conflicts. Examples include: deliberate attacks against civilians and civilian facilities such as schools and medical centers; hostage-taking; torture and other forms of ill-treatment, including sexual violence; summary executions; use of civilians as human shields; unlawful recruitment and use of children in hostilities; indiscriminate use of anti-personnel mines; forced displacement of civilians; looting; obstruction to, or diversion of, humanitarian assistance and attacks on humanitarian workers. Despite being protected under IHL, civilians, particularly women and children, are the primary victims of these and other acts of violence. Many IHL violations — though by no means all — are committed by ANSAs. Indeed, ANSAs’ lack of compliance with applicable law has been identified by the United Nations Secretary-General as one of the five most critical challenges to the protection of civilians.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 the Garance Series
    CONDUCT OF HOSTILITIES BY ARMED NON- STATE ACTORS Report from the 2020 Garance Talks The Garance Series: Issue 3 Table of Contents About Geneva Call .................................................................................................................................. 2 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................... 2 The Garance Talks .................................................................................................................................. 3 The Theme of the 2020 Garance Talks: The Conduct of Hostilities by ANSAs .......................... 4 Geneva Call’s approach to the theme ............................................................................................ 4 The legal framework ......................................................................................................................... 5 Box 1: Response by the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan to the 2012 Annual Report on the Protection of Civilians published by the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA): ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Box 2: Guidelines on the Law of Armed Conflict – National Transitional Council/Free Libyan Army, 2011. Rules on targeting and the use of violence: ....................................... 12 Views from ANSAs ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ussr Rejected Egypt's Invitation
    TONGSUN PARK MAY RETURN SEOUL (UPI) -- Milllonaire rlce merchant Tongsun Park, the key flgure in the alleged South Korean influence-buYlng actlvi­ tles in Washlngton, may change his mlnd and return to the U.S. to fa ce 1n ve s t i ga to rs, 0 f f 1ca 1 .....,V,.,.,0'"'"L.,."UM=E...-.-14.------'I'i'I'KW'MIA""I'JATiL"'E"F'iI Nr.-l\'A~T01'iT[T[-, "'1:M iiiAii"iRSOLHilI"AnL[---rI C'iSLIiA:iiNncDS~,--Wr.nE:=rDii\iN i:'CE s:iiDrJi'AYv. NOV EMB ER 30, 19 77 NUMBER 231 sources sald today. The sources said Park, who Economic Indica'ors had lived in the United States U.S.S.R. REJECTED for 25 years and considered Are Up In Ocfo'er the country his second home, "felt sorry" that the scandal WASHINGTON (uPI) -- The had stralned relations between government index intended to EGYPT'S INVITATION Seoul and Washlngton. predlct the dlrection of the CAIRO (UPI) -- The Soviet Union rejected Egypt's invitation "Should he change his mlnd American economy rose 0.7 per- for pre-Geneva Middle East peace talks today and Cairo declared and declde to go to the U.S. cent in October for its fourth regret Moscow was "wasting an opportunity" to promote peace and voluntarlly there is no reason straight monthly gain and hlt lmprove stralned Egyptian-Soviet relations. why we should oppose it," the highest level in four President Anwar Sadat said he will go ahead with the Eqyptian the sources sald. years, the Commerce Department peace conference, although other Arab powers planned to boycott Park was lndicted by a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Engaging Non-State Actors Compliance With
    Engaging Non-State Actors Toward Compliance With Humanitarian Norms (with focus on landmines, child soldiers and torture) A workshop to share the lessons learned by NGO coalitions active in this process and to discuss prospects for cooperation 15th July 2001 Geneva SUMMARY REPORT INTRODUCTION The workshop, organised by Geneva Call with the support of the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, took place on 15 July 2001 at the International Conference Centre of Geneva. It brought together representatives of the Non-State Actors Working Group of the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL), the Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers, the World Organisation against Torture (OMCT), Geneva Call and a small selection of individual experts and representatives from other organisations. The objectives of the workshop were the following: • to share knowledge and experiences on engagements with non-State actors (NSAs); • to draw general lessons from these diverse experiences; and • to discuss prospects of cooperation among attending NGO coalitions, thereby contributing to the development of best practice to enhance NSA receptivity and compliance with humanitarian norms. The following report summarises the presentations, highlights and conclusions of the discussions. HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSIONS 1. Non-State actors and landmines, child soldiers and torture 1.1 ICBL Non-State Actors Working Group Nature of the problem The Working Group representatives briefly outlined the origins of their work in engaging NSAs in the mine ban process. A call for action in respect to NSAs came in 1997 from several country campaigns within the ICBL, among others from Colombia, Philippines and South Africa, countries with a long history of internal armed conflict.
    [Show full text]