Kingdom of Belgium
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Flash Reports on Labour Law January 2017 Summary and Country Reports
Flash Report 01/2017 Flash Reports on Labour Law January 2017 Summary and country reports EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Unit B.2 – Working Conditions Flash Report 01/2017 Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017 ISBN ABC 12345678 DOI 987654321 © European Union, 2017 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Flash Report 01/2017 Country Labour Law Experts Austria Martin Risak Daniela Kroemer Belgium Wilfried Rauws Bulgaria Krassimira Sredkova Croatia Ivana Grgurev Cyprus Nicos Trimikliniotis Czech Republic Nataša Randlová Denmark Natalie Videbaek Munkholm Estonia Gaabriel Tavits Finland Matleena Engblom France Francis Kessler Germany Bernd Waas Greece Costas Papadimitriou Hungary Gyorgy Kiss Ireland Anthony Kerr Italy Edoardo Ales Latvia Kristine Dupate Lithuania Tomas Davulis Luxemburg Jean-Luc Putz Malta Lorna Mifsud Cachia Netherlands Barend Barentsen Poland Leszek Mitrus Portugal José João Abrantes Rita Canas da Silva Romania Raluca Dimitriu Slovakia Robert Schronk Slovenia Polonca Končar Spain Joaquín García-Murcia Iván Antonio Rodríguez Cardo Sweden Andreas Inghammar United Kingdom Catherine Barnard Iceland Inga Björg Hjaltadóttir Liechtenstein Wolfgang Portmann Norway Helga Aune Lill Egeland Flash Report 01/2017 Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................. -
Compensation for Victims of Disasters in Belgium, France, Germany and The
Véronique Bruggeman Michael Faure compensation for victims of disasters in belgium, france, germany and the netherlands working paper 30 paper working OM_WP 30.indd All Pages 10 Oct 2018 14:42:37 Compensation for Victims of Disasters in Belgium, France, Germany and the Netherlands This series consists of ‘Working Papers’ produced for the wrr that it regards as suffi- ciently significant and valuable to merit web publishing. The views and opinions expressed in these papers are those of the authors. A listing of all Working Papers can be found at www.wrr.nl. The Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy Buitenhof 34 po Box 20004 2500 ea The Hague, The Netherlands Phone +31 (0)70 356 46 00 Fax +31 (0)70 3564685 E-mail [email protected] Website www.wrr.nl Compensation for Victims of Disasters in Belgium, France, Germany and the Netherlands Véronique Bruggeman & Michael Faure All publications of the The Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy (wrr) are available at www.wrr.nl. Cover and paper design: Textcetera, The Hague Layout: Textcetera, The Hague Working Paper number 30 isbn 978-94-90186-71-5 nur 741 wrr, The Hague 2018 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a computer data file or published in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the publisher’s prior written consent. Insofar as the reproduction of any part of this publication is permitted under Section 16B of the Copyright Act [Auteurswet] 1912 in conjunction with the 20 June 1974 Decree, Stb. -
INFCIRC/193/Add.4
INF J7?¿7f-INFC1RC/193/Add.4 May 1989 GENERAL Distr. International Atomic Energy Agency original: ENGLISH INFORMATION CIRCULAR THE TEXT OF THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN BELGIUM, DENMARK, THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, GREECE, IRELAND, ITALY, LUXEMBOURG, THE NETHERLANDS, PORTUGAL, SPAIN, THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY AND THE AGENCY IN CONNECTION WITH THE TREATY ON THE NON-PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS Accession of Spain 1. Article 23(a) of the Agreement[l] of 5 April 1973 between Belgium, Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, Greece[2], Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal[3], the European Atomic Energy Community and the Agency in implementation of Article III(l) and (4) of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT)[4] provides that the Agreement shall come into force for non-nuclear-weapon States Party to NPT which become members of the European Atomic Energy Community upon: (i) Notification to the Agency by the State concerned that its procedures with respect to the coming into force of the Agreement have been completed; and (ii) Notification to the Agency by the European Atomic Energy Community that it is in a position to apply its safeguards in respect of that State for the purposes of the Agreement. 2. On 5 April 1989 the Agency received in respect of the European Atomic Energy Community and Spain the notifications required by Article 23(a) of the Agreement, which therefore came into force for Spain on that date. [1] Reproduced in document INFCIRC/193. [2] The agreement came into force for Greece on 17 December 1981. -
The French Community of Belgium
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Directorate for Education Education and Training Policy Division Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers Country Note: The French Community of Belgium Claude Lessard, Paulo Santiago, Jeannot Hansen and Karin Müller Kucera May 2004 This report is based on a study visit to the French Community of Belgium in June 2003, and background documents prepared to support the visit. As a result, the report is based on the situation up to that period. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the OECD or its Member countries. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1: INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Purposes of the OECD Review ........................................................................................................ 4 1.2 The Participation of the French Community .................................................................................... 5 1.3 Structure of the Country Note .......................................................................................................... 6 2: THE CONTEXT AND FEATURES OF TEACHER POLICY ................................................................. 6 2.1 The Structure of Government........................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Economic and social context........................................................................................................... -
Decision on Requests from the Kingdoms of Norway and Belgium
IF 15-S"/-1/J-fr UNITED J) .23 ,tf)s-- ]) J.32BJ NATIONS cl4 JlAl'1 ,l001 International Tribunal for the Case No.: IT-95-5118-PT Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations Date: 24 July 2009 of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Original: English • former Yugoslavia since 1991 IN THE TRIAL CHAMBER Before: Judge lain Bonomy, Presiding Judge Christoph Flfigge Judge Michele Picard Registrar: Mr. John Hocking Decision of: 24 July 2009 PROSECUTOR v. RADOV AN KARADZIC PUBLIC DECISION ON REQUESTS FROM THE KINGDOMS OF NORWAY AND BELGIUM Office of the Prosecutor The Government of the Kingdom of Norway Mr. Alan Tieger via Royal Norwegian Embassy Ms. Hildegard Vertz-Retzlaff to The Netherlands, The Hague The Accused The Government of the Kingdom of Belgium Mr. Radovan Karadzic via the Embassy of Belgium to The Netherlands, The Hague THIS TRIAL CHAMBER of the International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991 ("Tribunal") is seised of the "Response to the Invitation to the Kingdom of Norway" of 23 July 2009 and the correspondence of the Kingdom of Belgium of 23 July 2009 (collectively, "Requests"), and hereby renders its decision thereon. 1. In the Requests, the Governments of the Kingdoms of Norway and Belgium request an extension of time to respond to the Accused's motions requesting them to produce certain documents to him. 1 The Trial Chamber is currently seised of the "Motion for Binding Order: Government of Norway" filed by the Accused on 9 July 2009 ("Norway Motion"), and the "Motion for Binding Order: Government of Belgium" filed by the Accused on 20 July 2009 ("Belgium Motion") (collectively, "Motions,,).2 In the Motions, the Accused has acknowledged that the Governments should be given the opportunity to be heard on this issue.3 The Prosecution has submitted that it takes no position on the Motions.4 2. -
Belgium Europe FEDERAL COUNTRY
Belgium EUROPe FEDERAL COUNTRY Basic socio-economic indicators Income group - HIGH INCOME: OECD Local currency - Euro (EUR) Population and geography Economic data AREA: 30 326 km2 GDP: 487.8 billion (current PPP international dollars) i.e. 43 724 dollars per inhabitant (2014) POPULATION: million inhabitants (2014), 11.157 REAL GDP GROWTH: 1.3% (2014 vs 2013) an increase of 0.6% per year (2010-14) UNEMPLOYMENT RATE: 8.5% (2014) 2 DENSITY: 368 inhabitants/km FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT, NET INFLOWS (FDI): -20 097 (BoP, current USD millions, 2014) URBAN POPULATION: 97.8% of national population GROSS FIXED CAPITAL FORMATION (GFCF): 23% of GDP (2014) CAPITAL CITY: Brussels (18.2% of national population) HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX: 0.890 (very high), rank 21 Sources: OECD, Eurostat, World Bank, UNDP, ILO Territorial organisation and subnational government RESPONSIBILITIES MUNICIPAL LEVEL INTERMEDIATE LEVEL REGIONAL OR STATE LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF SNGs 589 10 6 605 municipalities provinces 3 regions (regions, (communes, gemeenten) (provinces, provincies) gewesten) and 3 communities Average municipal size: (communautés, 19 030 inhabitantS gemeenschappen) Main features of territorial organisation. Since the adoption of the 1831 Constitution, six constitutional revisions have progressively transformed Belgium from a unitary into a federal country, in particular since 1970. The last reform, started in 2011 and operational since 2014, further strengthened the federalisation of the country. Belgium has three tiers of SNGs: 6 federated states, including 3 regional governments (Flanders, Wallonia and the Brussels capital-region) and 3 community governments (Flemish, German, and French Speaking Communities) which overlap territorially; 10 provinces; and 589 municipalities which are governed by regional legislation. -
Malta: Selected Essays in Governance and Public Administration
Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies (MEDAC) Malta: Selected Essays in Governance and Public Administration Godfrey A. Pirotta Med Agenda MEDAC Publications in Mediterranean IR and Diplomacy Malta: Selected Essays in Governance and Public Administration Godfrey A. Pirotta Prof. Godfrey A. Pirotta Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies (MEDAC) Malta: Selected Essays in Governance and Public Administration Godfrey A. Pirotta Malta, January 2021 Med Agenda MEDAC Publications in Mediterranean IR and Diplomacy Table Of Contents 5 About the author 6 Preface 10 Acknowledgments Part 1 12 Bread, Language and Civil Service Employment 25 From Hymn to National Anthem 32 Building a New Parliament House 48 Maltese Political Parties and Political Modernization 62 The Malta Labor Party and the Church: Building the Democratic State: 1921-1976 86 Struggling for a Role: Women and Politics in Malta 106 Malta’s Foreign Policy After Mintoff 111 The Challenge of European Membership: A Study of Malta’s Parliament Approach to the Issue 1962-87 133 The Disciplines of Politics and Public Administration in Malta 150 Photo Inset Part 2 158 Future of the Public Service 166 Politics and Public Service Reform in Small States: Malta 178 The Organization of Public Administration and Civil Society: Comments and Remarks 186 L-Istat u t-Tmexxija tal-Istituzzjonijiet 196 Bringing Good Governance to Malta 202 A New Creation or an Image and Likeness? The Maltese Experience of Establishing Local Governance in a Centralized Micro-State 218 Public Administration Education and Training in Small States: The Case of Malta 1950-1995 242 A Farewell to Paternalism Through Public Enterprise? Privatisation in the Small Island State of Malta 258-270 The Politics of Public Expenditure in Malta Pirotta – Malta: Selected Essays in Governance and Public Administration About the author GODFREY A. -
Latvia Norway Czech Republic Greece Spain Hungary Serbia
European Landscape Convention Landscape Award of the Council of Europe 5th Session 2016-2017 Thirteen projects were presented by the States’ Parties to the European Landscape Convention to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe. On 27 September 2017, the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe decided to: 1. confer the Landscape Award of the Council of Europe’s European Landscape Convention on: Regeneration of Daugavpils Fortress to Preserve Cultural and Historical Objects, Daugavpils City Council, Latvia Award conferred for regeneration of a degraded symbolic Latvia Belgium Italy landscape 2. confer identical special mentions of the Landscape Award of the Council of Europe to the following achievements: The Hillside of the Citadel in Liège: 1999-2010. From an Enclosure to a Network, City of Liège, Belgium. Special mention for “Public participation” Regeneration of the landscape and archaeological Park of the Valley of the Temples in Agrigento, Department of Cultural Heritage and Identity of Sicily, Italy. Special mention Norway Slovak Republic Andorra for “Sustainable development and social reintegration” Alna Environmental Park: a blue-green corridor of biodiversity, recreational opportunities and sustainable urban water management, Municipality of Oslo, Agency for Urban Environment, Norway. Special mention for “Social cohesion and respect for the environment” Hriňovské lazy: landscape of values, Town of Hriňová, Slovak Republic. Special mention for “Preservation of a unique landscape under threat” 3. acknowledge the -
Lowering Employment Barriers in Belgium and Norway
OECD Jobs Strategy Implementation Note February 2020 Identifying and addressing employment barriers in Belgium and Norway Implementing the OECD Jobs Strategy Rodrigo Fernandez, Alexander Hijzen, Daniele Pacifico and Stefan Thewissen OECD Jobs Strategy Implementation Note February 2020 Identifying and addressing employment barriers in Belgium and Norway Implementing the OECD Jobs Strategy Rodrigo Fernandez, Alexander Hijzen, Daniele Pacifico and Stefan Thewissen Abstract The OECD actively supports countries with the implementation of the OECD Jobs Strategy, amongst others through the preparation of Jobs Strategy Implementation Notes. This note documents analytical work carried out to complement the 2019 Economic Surveys for Belgium and Norway and support these countries in their endeavour of promoting quality employment. The note documents joblessness in OECD countries, provides a detailed diagnosis of employment barriers in Belgium and Norway by applying the OECD Faces of Joblessness methodology and discusses the policy implications. Contacts: [email protected]; [email protected] │ 1 Introduction About a quarter of the working-age population across OECD countries is not in employment, education or full-time training. An additional tenth of the working-age population has a weak attachment to the labour market, as exemplified by restricted hours, intermittent jobs, or very low earnings. Individuals in these situations often face barriers that prevent them from fully engaging in employment. These barriers can include weak employability due to limited work readiness (low work-related skills, education or a lack of work experience) or work availability (care responsibilities or health-related limitations); a lack of motivation if work does not “pay”; and scarce opportunities due to insufficient job creation (Figure 1) (OECD, 2015[1]). -
Belgium: History, Culture, and Geography of Music
The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Music and Culture Belgium: History, Culture, and Geography of Music Contributors: Alessandro Mazzola Edited by: Janet Sturman Book Title: The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Music and Culture Chapter Title: "Belgium: History, Culture, and Geography of Music" Pub. Date: 2019 Access Date: May 1, 2019 Publishing Company: SAGE Publications, Inc. City: Thousand Oaks, Print ISBN: 9781483317755 Online ISBN: 9781483317731 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483317731.n96 Print pages: 337-339 © 2019 SAGE Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This PDF has been generated from SAGE Knowledge. Please note that the pagination of the online version will vary from the pagination of the print book. SAGE SAGE Reference © 2019 by SAGE Publications, Inc. Belgium is a multicultural, polyethnic, and multilingual state in Western Europe. Due to its location at the Ro- mance-Germanic language border, it hosts and officially recognizes different cultural communities divided by language. The Dutch-speaking community or Flanders in the north and the French-speaking community or Wallonia in the south are the two main communities. A small German-speaking community is located on the German border. The region of Brussels is Dutch–French bilingual. Furthermore, numerous migration flows from southern Europe, North and Sub-Saharan Africa, South America, and Asia have had a strong impact on—and still are complexifying—social customs, local cultures, and cultural production, both in the main- stream and nonmainstream. Music reflects such complexity by representing Belgium’s diverse sociocultural geography, by conveying the images and symbols of the different traditions, languages, and ideas present in the country. -
Controlling Migratory Flows in Malta (
n°403/2 September 2004 International Federation for Human Rights Report International Fact-Finding Mission Locking up foreigners, deterring refugees: controlling migratory flows in Malta 1- MISSION BACKGROUND . 5 2- MALTESE IMMIGRATION POLICY - BACKGROUND. 7 3- THE FACTS. 9 4- CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS . 33 Appendix 1- Bibliography . 36 Appendix 2- Note on the principles relating to the detention of Asylum Seekers in international legal instruments . 37 Appendix 3- Documents Given to the Asylum Seekers . 39 Locking up foreigners, deterring refugees: controlling migratory flows in Malta Table of Contents 1- MISSION BACKGROUND . 5 1-1 Purpose of the mission and mandate . 5 1-2 Persons and NGOs met. 5 1-3 A series of recent investigations . 6 2- MALTESE IMMIGRATION POLICY - BACKGROUND. 7 2-1 Lying along the migration route from the South to Europe . 7 2-2 Constraints cited by Malta. 7 2-3 EU accession: a further constraint . 8 3- THE FACTS. 9 3-1 Systematic detention of foreigners . 9 3-1.1 Detention of "illegal" foreigners as a way to control immigration. 9 3-1.1.1 The basis for a policy of generalized detention of immigrants 3-1.1.2 Detention centers for foreigners 3-1.2 Living conditions in the camps. 13 3-1.2.1 Material conditions are precarious but nonetheless perennial 3-1.2.2 Numerous psychological problems 3-1.3 Young children are also in detention . 19 3-2 A 'trompe-l'oeil' Right to asylum . 20 3-2.1 Refugee law: from theory to reality. 20 3-2.1.1 The situation before 2001 3-2.1.2 The new context of seeking asylum in Malta 3-2.1.3 A look at the Refugee Act XX of 2000 3-2.1.4 The procedural framework 3-2.2 The asylum procedure in practice . -
Malta's EU Story
MALTA’S EU STORY HOW TEN YEARS OF EU MEMBERSHIP HAVE CHANGED THE COUNTRY MALTA’S EU STORY HOW TEN YEARS OF EU MEMBERSHIP HAVE CHANGED THE COUNTRY A Discussion Paper June 2014 Lead Author - Patrick Tabone Research - Veronica Nardelli MALTA’S EU STORY: HOW TEN YEARS OF EU MEMBERSHIP HAVE CHANGED THE COUNTRY A Discussion Paper Published by The Today Public Policy Institute Lead Author: Patrick Tabone Presented to the Prime Minister, June 2014 The Today Public Policy Institute is an autonomous, not-for-profit, non-governmental organisation. Its mission is to promote wide understanding of strategic issues of national importance and to help in the development and implementation of sound public policies. In pursuit of this mission, it sponsors or initiates research on specific national problems, encourages solutions to those problems and facilitates public debate on them. It is not affiliated to any political party or movement. Its Board is made up of the following individuals: Martin Scicluna (Director General), Michael Bonello, Sina Bugeja, Stephen Calleya, Juanito Camilleri, Petra Caruana Dingli, John Cassar White, George Debono, Mark Anthony Falzon, Michael Frendo, Martin Galea, Joseph Sammut, Joseph V. Tabone, Clare Vassallo, John Vassallo and Joseph F.X. Zahra. Board members participate in The Today Public Policy Institute on a voluntary basis and in their personal capacity. Their association with the Institute and with the specific reports produced for the Institute by Lead Authors in the think-tank is without prejudice to the policies and positions of their respective institutions or organisations, nor does it necessarily imply the endorsement by each Board member of the conclusions and recommendations presented in such reports.