REVISED FINAL REPORT February 6, 2006 Mission Dates: October 2-15, 2005

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

REVISED FINAL REPORT February 6, 2006 Mission Dates: October 2-15, 2005 US Department of Agriculture - Forest Service International Programs Technical Assistance Trip to the Republic of Ghana In Support of the Forestry Commission of Ghana Wildfire Management Project in the Forest Transitional Zone: Identification of Fire Engines, Hand Tools and Fire Lookout Towers REVISED FINAL REPORT February 6, 2006 Mission Dates: October 2-15, 2005 Sections of the report were compiled and edited as follows: Introduction, Summary Fire Lookout Tower Wildfire Suppression and Conclusions Assessment Tools and Engine Blessing Etim Asuquo Christopher Shields Clay Fowler Africa Program Specialist Structural Engineer Fire Operations Supervisor US Forest Service US Forest Service Bureau of Land Management 1099 14th Street N.W 1323 Club Drive 2815 H. Road Washington, DC 20005 Vallejo, CA 94592 Grand Junction, CO 81506 (202) 501-2581 (707) 562-8863 (970) 244-3108 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Acronyms……………………………………………………………………...….3 Introduction………………………………………………………………………..……..4 Summary……………..……………………………………………………………..…….4 I. Fire Lookout Towers – Tasks and Conclusions……………………………….........6 II. Wildfire Suppression Tools and Engines - Findings and Recommendations.......11 Conclusions......………………………………………………………………………….14 Appendices Appendix 1: Scope of Work………………………………………….….….…..15 Appendix 2: USFS Team Agenda………………………………………………18 Fire Lookout Tower Example Drawings Appendix 1: Standard Steel Lookout Tower…………….…………….Attachment Appendix 2: Standard Treated Timber Lookout tower…………….….Attachment Appendix 3: Standard 14’ x 14’ Lookout House…………..……….…Attachment Appendix 4: Standard 7’ x 7’ Lookout House…………………...……Attachment Appendix 5: Lightning Protection System…………………………….Attachment Appendix 6: Lookout House Utilities……………………...………….Attachment Tools and Engines Example Photos Appendix 1: Fire fighting hand tools……...…………………………..Attachment Appendix 2: 668 Wildland Ultra XT “Heavy”…….…………………..Attachment Appendix 3: 662 Light Engine on Hummer H1 “Light”………...….....Attachment Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………….20 2 LIST OF ACRONYMS BLM Bureau of Land Management (US) CFO Community Fire Organization DIFO District Interagency Forest Organization FGC Forestry Commission of Ghana GDP Gross Domestic Product GPS Global Positioning System GNFS Ghana National Fire Service KNUST Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology MLFM Ministry of Lands Forests and Mines NADMO National Disaster Management Organization RMSC Resource Management and Support Center USDA United States Department of Agriculture USFS United States Forest Service USFS/IP United States Forest Service International Programs 3 INTRODUCTION A three-member team of USDA Forest Service (USFS) arrived in Ghana at the request of the Ghana Forestry Commission to assist in the implementation of the second phase of the Wildfire Management Project in the Forest Transitional Zone. This mission was the first in a series of missions which the USFS will conduct until 2008 when this phase of the project and the agreement between the US Forest Service and the Ministry of Lands, Forest and Mines (MLFM) will expire. The MLFM in response to increasing threat of wildfire to Ghana’s forest reserves and surrounding farmlands has embarked on a strategy to reduce wildfire occurrences through community education, forestry staff training, replanting in degraded areas, and acquisition of proper fire fighting equipment. The project is concentrating on the Forest Transitional Zone of Ghana where fire-prone, northern savannah is expanding and encroaching on the southern high forests. The southern high forest is where Ghana’s valuable timber concessions are found, accounting for 6% of Ghana’s annual GDP. The USFS promotes sustainable forest management internationally and maintains a unique wildland fire management program that integrates technology with social practices and needs. In the assessment phase of the Wildfire Management Project, USFS findings and recommendations were integrated in the Manual of Procedure which currently serves as the guiding principles for this phase, implementation. The USFS role in the implementation phase is focusing on equipment procurement and training in fire suppression for technical and volunteer staff. SUMMARY The objective of the first mission was to assess the status of the Wildfire suppression project through meetings, published documents, field visits and dialogue with community fire volunteers as they relate to the need for fire look-out towers, fire fighting gear, hand tools and suitable fire engines. Sites visits were made to the following reserves: • Bobiri Butterfly Sanctuary (Bobiri District, Ashante Region) • Afram Headwaters Forest Reserve (Offinso District, Ashante Region) • Mpameso Forest Reserve (Bachem District, Sunyani Region) • Bomfobiri Wildlife Sanctuary (Kumawu District, Ashante Region) • Worobong South Forest Reserve (Begoro Region) Key to the success of the mission was the collaboration with the Ghana National Fire Service (GNFS), National Disaster Management Organization (NADMO) and the Ghana Wildlife Division. At the request of the Forestry Commission, the mission received national media coverage to inform the public of the project’s on-going activities. All data collected in the field were analyzed in collaboration with RMSC technicians to arrive at the following recommendations. • RMSC should procure a mix of light and heavy fire engines, all of which should have extreme terrain capability 4 • Community Fire Organization (CFO) volunteer should be equipped with proper fire-fighting tools and personal protective equipment to prevent the loss of lives • Develop standard drawings for both steel and timber fire lookout towers • Priority should be given to domestic engineering firms for fire tower designs and construction, as their offices would be easily accessible to the project managers for consultations. • Develop MOU with a government engineering branch to act as the engineering agent for the Forestry Commission. 5 I. Wildfire Management Project of Ghana USDA/IP First Mission, October 1, 2005 to 16 October, 2005 Activity: Fire Lookout Tower Assessment Background As defined by the First Mission Scope of Work, the Forestry Commission of Ghana has tasked the USFS International Program to: • Task 1: Review the procedures for the selection of sites for the construction of fire observation towers. • Task 2: Design appropriate tower for design in fire risk forest reserves. • Task 3: Assist in evaluating applications on the construction of fire observation towers. Report Task 1: The USFS Team reviewed the following two RMSC documents on 5 October, 2005: Document 1: “Wildfire Management Project in the Transition Zone”, 29 August 2002 (Ref. 1). This document identified 17 tower sites, interspersed within seven reserves, with each reserve initially receiving one tower. Accessibility, fauna, availability of water sources, and required tower height were also listed for each site. The site selection criteria included: • Locations with wide field of view. • Near areas with high fire frequency and short fire-return intervals. • Areas close to volunteer settlements. • Accessible by road or footpath. • Significant resource value. Document 2: “Implementation of the Wildfire Management Project in the Transition Zone, Achievement for the Period March, 2002 – Dec, 2003”, September, 2005 (Ref. 2). This document, in paragraph 2.1.5, Output 5, identified the need for forty lookout towers within 19 forest and wildlife reserves. Task 1 Conclusion: The selection criteria used in Reference 1 are valid. During the review, RMSC also expressed the desire to place communication antenna on the lookout towers. This will require the lookout towers to be placed at high points that provide a line-of-sight between antennas. This may not be compatible with the other selection criteria used to site the lookouts. A team of USFS/IP communications specialists are scheduled to travel to Ghana in the near future for the second mission. This team will provide antenna location criteria, which may require additional communication towers, in addition to those on the lookout towers. 6 Task 2: On 6 October through 9 October, representatives of the Forestry Commission guided the USFS Team to three forest reserves, and one wildlife reserve. The purpose for the site visits was to inspect one of the proposed tower sites identified in Reference 1, for each of the reserves listed. The sites were selected by RMSC for this initial investigation, and were considered representative of other sites within that same reserve. The following lists the sites visited, and observations made that were in addition to those listed in Reference 1. • Afram Headwaters Forest Reserve, Hill #2. This site is located within a green buffer zone on top of a shallow hill. Excellent field of view. Reference 1 estimated the required tower height to be 5m. The USFS Team concurs with this recommendation. However, if the surrounding hillside is planted with plantation trees in the future, the tower height should be adjusted to rise above the estimated canopy. • Mpameso Forest Reserve, Hill #2. This site is also located within a green buffer zone, but the surrounding terrain is gradual, and the forest canopy is approximately 30m high. Reference 1 estimated the required tower height to be 20m. For the tower to be effective for observing wildfires, the USFS Team recommends a 35m tower to reach above the canopy. This may be an excessive tower height. An alternate
Recommended publications
  • Stream-Gaging Procedure a Manual Describing Methods and Practices of the Geological Survey
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director. Water-Supply Paper 888 STREAM-GAGING PROCEDURE A MANUAL DESCRIBING METHODS AND PRACTICES OF THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BY DON M. COKBETT AND OTHERS UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1943 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington, D. C. Price 65 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Foreword, by Nathan C. Grover____--_-______-____________________ xin Introduction. __ ________-__-_-____________--____________::_____.____ 1 Administration, personnel, and acknowledgments._----_-_--___________ 2 Organization for water-resources investigations,__-_-_-____-___-__-__-- 3 Water Resources Branch._______________________________________ 3 Division of Surface Water ___________________________________ 3 Division of Ground Water.,___--_-_____-___-_---_-________ 4 Division of Quality of Water__-------___--________________ 4 Division of Power Resources._______________________________ 4 Division of Water Utilization.-_____________________________ 4 Administration and operation.__________________________________ 4 Personnel ___________________________________________________ 5 Recruiting of personnel___________________________________- 5 Training of personnel-_______________________--__------_--_ 6 General procedure.._______________________________________________ 7 Records of stage___________________-_______---_-__---_--_--____-_ 8 Methods of obtaining gage-height record.____________-_-_---_____
    [Show full text]
  • The Rising Cost of Wildfire Protection
    A Research Paper by The Rising Cost of Wildfire Protection Ross Gorte, Ph.D. Retired Senior Policy Analyst, Congressional Research Service Affiliate Research Professor, Earth Systems Research Center of the Earth, Oceans, and Space Institute, University of New Hampshire June 2013 The Rising Cost of Wildfire Protection June 2013 PUBLISHED ONLINE: http://headwaterseconomics.org/wildfire/fire-costs-background/ ABOUT THIS REPORT Headwaters Economics produced this report to better understand and address why wildfires are becoming more severe and expensive. The report also describes how the protection of homes in the Wildland-Urban Interface has added to these costs and concludes with a brief discussion of solutions that may help control escalating costs. Headwaters Economics is making a long-term commitment to better understanding these issues. For additional resources, see: http://headwaterseconomics.org/wildfire. ABOUT HEADWATERS ECONOMICS Headwaters Economics is an independent, nonprofit research group whose mission is to improve community development and land management decisions in the West. CONTACT INFORMATION Ray Rasker, Ph.D. Executive Director, Headwaters Economics [email protected] 406 570-7044 Ross Gorte, Ph.D.: http://www.eos.unh.edu/Faculty/rosswgorte P.O. Box 7059 Bozeman, MT 59771 http://headwaterseconomics.org Cover image “Firewise” by Monte Dolack used by permission, Monty Dolack Gallery, Missoula Montana. TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Management.Indd
    Fire today ManagementVolume 65 • No. 2 • Spring 2005 LLARGEARGE FFIRESIRES OFOF 2002—P2002—PARTART 22 United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Erratum In Fire Management Today volume 64(4), the article "A New Tool for Mopup and Other Fire Management Tasks" by Bill Gray shows incorrect telephone and fax numbers on page 47. The correct numbers are 210-614-4080 (tel.) and 210-614-0347 (fax). Fire Management Today is published by the Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. The Secretary of Agriculture has determined that the publication of this periodical is necessary in the transaction of the pub- lic business required by law of this Department. Fire Management Today is for sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, at: Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: 202-512-1800 Fax: 202-512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 Fire Management Today is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/fmt/index.html Mike Johanns, Secretary Melissa Frey U.S. Department of Agriculture General Manager Dale Bosworth, Chief Robert H. “Hutch” Brown, Ph.D. Forest Service Managing Editor Tom Harbour, Director Madelyn Dillon Fire and Aviation Management Editor Delvin R. Bunton Issue Coordinator The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communica- tion of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720- 2600 (voice and TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • Good Fire/Bad Fire Station
    Wood Magic Forest Fair Good Fire/Bad Fire Station 2017 Edition (New language is highlighted in blue) Objective Students will be able to describe several benefits of prescribed burning and the hazards of not prescribed burning. Also, construct scientific arguments to support claims that human activity affects the land and define how human activity can sometimes cause problems and sometimes be beneficial. Standard: 5.E.3B.3 Construct scientific arguments to support claims that human activity affects the land. 5.L.4A.1 Analyze and interpret data to summarize the abiotic factors of different terrestrial ecosystems. 5.E.3B.4 Define problems caused by human activities and test to reduce the impact on land. 5.L.4B.2 Develop and use models of food chains and food webs to describe the flow of energy in an ecosystem 5.L.4B.4 Construct scientific arguments to explain how limiting factors, or a newly introduced organism can affect an ecosystem. Overview Students will contrast fires that are helpful for man and nature and those that are harmful. They will then explore the benefits that properly conducted controlled burns provide by examining, comparing and contrasting an unburned area with a prescribed burned area. Materials List Items for Class: • Copy of script • 30 small fire shirts • 1 table • Fire plow Items for Speaker A: • Wear Nomex fire clothes over WMFF shirt. If you don’t have full Nomex, put on a yellow fire shirt • Pine cone with seeds in it – usually you can find one around the site somewhere • Good Fire/ Bad Fire posters/flash cards • Fire triangle diagram • Matches • Drip torch.
    [Show full text]
  • Prineville Interagency Hotshot Crew Ochoco & Deschutes National Forests and Prineville BLM Central Oregon Fire Management Service
    Prineville Interagency Hotshot Crew Ochoco & Deschutes National Forests and Prineville BLM Central Oregon Fire Management Service OUTREACH NOTICE The Ochoco National Forest will soon be filling 2- GS-0462-04/05 Interagency Hotshot Crew Senior Firefighter positions. These positions are permanent seasonal positions with a tour of duty that includes full-time or less than full-time (guaranteed minimum 6 months/13 pay periods of full-time employment). If on a seasonal schedule, you will be placed in a non-pay status for the rest of the season. Duty station is located in Prineville, Oregon. OCRP-462-IHC/HCREW-4/5DP https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetail/328826500 Demo OCRP-462-IHC/HCREW-4/5G https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetail/328826400 Merit PLEASE NOTE: The purpose of this outreach notice is to determine the potential applicant pool for this position and to establish the appropriate recruitment method and area of consideration for the advertisement. Responses received from this outreach notice will be relied upon to make this determination. Reply due date to this outreach notice is January 28, 2013. THE POSITION: The position is located on a wildland fire crew (Prineville Interagency Hotshot Crew). The purpose of the position is wildland fire suppression/management/control as a specialized firefighter with responsibility for the operation and maintenance of specialized tools or equipment. Other wildland fire related duties may involve fire prevention, patrol, detection, or prescribed burning. These are permanent positions with varying tours of duty and may include weekend work. Some positions may have irregular and protracted hours of work.
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Management and Drainage Manual for the Lake Maumelle Drainage Basin Pulaski County, Arkansas
    Stormwater Management and Drainage Manual for the Lake Maumelle Drainage Basin Pulaski County, Arkansas Pulaski County Planning & Development June 2010 Pulaski County Pulaski County Stormwater Management and Drainage Manual Acknowledgements This Manual was developed by Tetra Tech, Inc., under contract to Pulaski County Public Works. Jonathan Smith and John Kosco led development of the Manual, with assistance from Garrett Budd, Scott Job, and Christy Williams (Tetra Tech) and Greg Hoffmann and Cecilia Lane (Center for Watershed Protection). The direction and guidance of Van McClendon (Pulaski County Planning & Development), Sherman Smith (Pulaski County Public Works) and Martin Maner and Jonathan Long (Central Arkansas Water) are greatly appreciated. In addition, the County would like to thank the individuals who took the time to comment on the Public Review Draft of the Manual, including Kathy Wells, Bruno Krisch, Hayes Lenhart, Ben Urbonas, Ian Paton, and Tim Daters. June 2010 ii Pulaski County Stormwater Management and Drainage Manual Contents Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................................................ii Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... v Part 1: Erosion and Sediment Control BMPs .......................................................................................... 7 1.1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ashley National Forest Seasonal Employment Outreach Wildland Firefighter Positions 2013
    Ashley National Forest Seasonal Employment Outreach Wildland Firefighter Positions 2013 The Ashley National Forest will be filling seasonal wildland firefighter positions for the 2013 fire season. The fire positions will be located on Duchesne, Vernal, and Flaming Gorge Ranger Districts. Engine positions will be located in Duchesne, Manila, and Dutch John, Utah. Handcrew positions will be located in Vernal and Duchesne, Utah. A dispatch position will be located in Vernal, Utah. The vacancy announcements for these positions are posted on the United States Forest Service official website for application submittal: https://www.usajobs.gov/ These are Open Continuous vacancy announcements. Those that wish to be considered for available positions must apply to the corresponding announcement number by close of business on February 1, 2013 . All applicants who have applied to announcements on or before the listed date and are found to be qualified will be referred for consideration. Applicants must apply to vacancy announcement numbers listed below: Ashley National Forest Fire Management Seasonal Positions 2013 Duty Station Announcement Number Description Duchesne, Dutch John, TEMPOCR-0462-03-FIRE-DT Forestry Aid (Firefighter) Manila, Vernal GS-0462-03-Fire General Duchesne, Vernal TEMPOCR-462-4-HANDCREW-DT Forestry Technician GS-0462-04-Hand Crew Duchesne, Vernal TEMPOCR-0462-5-HANDCREW-DT Forestry Technician GS-0462-05-Hand Crew Duchesne, Dutch John, TEMPOCR-0462-4-ENGINE-DT Forestry Technician Manila GS-0462-04-Engine Duchesne, Dutch John, TEMPOCR-0462-05-ENGINE-DT Forestry Technician Manila GS-0462-05-Engine 1 Typical Length of Season: May thru October Housing: Seasonal government housing facilities are available at Duchesne (Stockmore Guard Station), Manila, and Dutch John.
    [Show full text]
  • Gardex E Catalogue
    index hammers 003 picks & mattocks 057 axes 015 hoes 067 wedges 021 forks 083 mauls 023 wrecking / pry bars 029 forged spades & shovels 087 chisels 035 rakes 093 mason pegs 041 tampers & scrapers 097 bolsters 043 bars 047 slashers 103 Hammers PRODUCT NAME DE CODE CODE CO HANDLES AMERICAN HARDWOOD (AHW) AVAILABLE WEIGHTS AW F 2GF 3GF 4GF AVAILABLE HANDLES ( ) CLUB HAMMER FIBERGLASS (F) 60411085 2G FIBERGLASS (2GF) 3G FIBERGLASS (3GF) 2.5, 4 LBS 4G FIBERGLASS (4GF) AHW F 2GF 3GF 4GF 3 Hammers BRASS NON SPARKING HAMMER MACHINIST HAMMER 60411126 60413000 6, 8, 10, 12 LBS AHW F 2GF 3GF 4GF CLUB HAMMER CONICAL EYE 60411096 3, 4, 5 KG AHW F 2GF 3GF 4GF CROSS PEIN HAMMER 60411070 3, 4, 5 KG 2, 3, 4 LBS AHW F 2GF 3GF 4GF AHW F 2GF 3GF 4GF 5 Hammers SLEDGE HAMMER STONNING HAMMER (ESP) 60411147 60411015 700, 1000, 1400 GMS AHW F 2GF 3GF 4GF ENGINEERING HAMMER 60411000 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20 LBS AHW F 2GF 3GF 4GF DRILLING HAMMER 60411058 2, 3, 4 LBS 1, 2, 3, 4 LBS AHW F 2GF 3GF 4GF AHW F 2GF 3GF 4GF 7 Hammers CLAW HAMMER AMERICAN TYPE TUBULAR CLAW HAMMER 60412041 60412056 16, 20, 24 OZ 16 OZ AHW F 2GF 3GF 4GF AHW F 2GF 3GF 4GF CLAW HAMMER RIP ALL STEEL CLAW HAMMER 60411212 60412058 16, 20 OZ 16 OZ AHW F 2GF 3GF 4GF AHW F 2GF 3GF 4GF CARPENTER CLAW HAMMER WITH/WITHOUT MAGNET CLAW HAMMER FR TYPE 60412006 60412000 250, 350, 450 GMS 700 GMS AHW F 2GF 3GF 4GF AHW F 2GF 3GF 4GF 9 Hammers MACHINIST HAMMER BALL PEIN HAMMER 60411111 60411240 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48 OZ AHW F 2GF 3GF 4GF AHW F 2GF 3GF 4GF STONING HAMMER 60411142 100, 200, 300, 400,
    [Show full text]
  • English-Portuguese Equivalents of Forestry and Conservation Terms Termos Equivalentes Em Silvicultura E Conserva@O Portugub-Ingl
    English-Portuguese Equivalents of Forestry and Conservation Terms Forest Service Southern Forest Experiment Station Termos Equivalentes em silvicultura e New Orleans, Louisiana conserva@o Portugub-InglQs General Technical Report so-1 09 September 1994 John K. Francis ENGLISH-PORTUGUESE EQUIVALENTS OF FORESTRY AND CONSERVATTON TERMS John K. Francis FOREWORD cooperative research and technology transfer in the Amazon Basin. This dictionary of forestry Signs of deterioration of the global environ- and conservation terms has been prepared to aid ment and threatened destruction of the vast in communications with our Portuguese-speak- Amazon forest have stirred a call for action. ing colleagues and for the benefit of others fac- Conservationists have always been concerned ing similar language barriers. about the tropical forests; now funds are being made available for increased work on problems Forestry and conservation are very broad in the region. Brazilian scientists struggle to fields, which include many subfields that have communicate with colleagues in the rest of the large and detailed vocabularies. I have attempted world while scientists from other areas are dis- to collect the most common and useful of these covering that to work effectively in Brazil, one terms and determine the equivalencies in English must speak Portuguese. One must also be able and Portuguese. In many cases, several terms to read Portuguese to benefit from the local tech- denote the same concept. They will be listed nical literature. separately, alphabetically in the primary lan- guage (left hand column), and in series in the English-speaking scientists have not pre- secondary language (right hand column) with the pared themselves particularly well in other lan- most common term placed first.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining Dispatching Practices for Interagency Hotshot Crews to Reduce Seasonal Travel Distance and Manage Fatigue
    CSIRO PUBLISHING International Journal of Wildland Fire 2018, 27, 569–580 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF17163 Examining dispatching practices for Interagency Hotshot Crews to reduce seasonal travel distance and manage fatigue Erin J. BelvalA,D, David E. CalkinB, Yu WeiA, Crystal S. StonesiferB, Matthew P. ThompsonC and Alex MasarieA ADepartment of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Warner College of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA. BUSDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 800 E Beckwith Avenue, Missoula, MT 59801, USA. CUSDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 240 W Prospect Road, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA. DCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Interagency Hotshot Crews (IHCs) are a crucial firefighting suppression resource in the United States. These crews travel substantial distances each year and work long and arduous assignments that can cause accumulated fatigue. Current dispatching practices for these crews are supposed to send the closest resource while adhering to existing fatigue- management policies. In this research, we designed a simulation process that repeatedly implements an optimisation model to assign crews to suppression requests. This study examines the potential effects of using an optimisation approach to shorten seasonal crew travel distances and mitigate fatigue. We also examine the potential benefits of coordinating crew-dispatch decisions to meet multiple requests. Results indicate there is substantial room for improvement in reducing travel distances while still balancing crew fatigue; coordinating crew dispatching for multiple requests can increase the assignment efficiency, particularly when both fatigue mitigation and travel distances are jointly optimised. This research indicates implementing an optimisation model for dispatching IHCs is promising.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Fire Season and Wildfire Management Program Review
    Review of Alberta Agriculture and Forestry’s Wildfire Management Program and the 2015 Fire Season Volume 1: Summary Report Prepared By: MNP LLP Suite 1600, MNP Tower 10235 – 101 Street NW Edmonton, AB T5J 3G1 Prepared For: Forestry Division, Alberta Agriculture and Forestry 10th Floor Petroleum Plaza South Tower 9915 - 108 Street Edmonton, AB T5K 2G8 Date: December 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Alberta’s 2015 Wildfire Management Program ................................................. 1 2. The 2015 Fire Season ......................................................................................... 4 3. A Review and Evaluation of Alberta’s Wildfire Management Program .......... 7 3.1 Wildfire Prevention Program ................................................................................... 7 3.2 Wildfire Detection .................................................................................................. 12 3.3 Presuppression Preparedness .............................................................................. 14 3.4 Suppression .......................................................................................................... 16 3.5 Policy and Planning .............................................................................................. 18 3.6 Resource Sharing and Mutual Aid......................................................................... 20 4. Flat Top Complex Recommendations ............................................................ 23 4.1 Evaluation of Fulfillment of the Flat Top Review Recommendations
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines to Minimize the Impacts of Hemlock Woolly Adelgid
    United States Department of Eastern Hemlock Agriculture Forest Service Forests: Guidelines to Northeastern Area State & Private Minimize the Impacts of Forestry Morgantown, WV Hemlock Woolly Adelgid NA-TP-03-04 Cover photographs (clockwise from upper left): hemlock woolly adelgid (Adelges tsugae) ovisacs on hemlock needles (Michael Montgomery, USDA Forest Service), hemlock-shaded stream (Jeff Ward, The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station), and black-throated green warbler (Mike Hopiak, Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology). Information about pesticides appears in this publication. Publication of this information does not constitute endorsement or recommendation by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, nor does it imply that all uses discussed have been registered. Use of most pesticides is regulated by State and Federal law. Applicable regulations must be obtained from appropriate regulatory agencies. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fish or other wildlife if not handled or applied properly. Use all pesticides selectively and carefully. Follow recommended practices given on the label for use and disposal of pesticides and pesticide containers. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities based on race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or familial status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice or TDD).
    [Show full text]