DOCSLIB.ORG

Sarasota Bay Year 2 Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sarasota Bay Year 2 Report Data Summary Report: Nekton of Sarasota Bay and a Comparison of Nekton Community Structure in Adjacent Southwest Florida Estuaries for Year Five (June 2013 – April 2014) T.C. MacDonald; R.F. Jones; E. Weather; R.H. McMichael, Jr. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute 100 Eighth Avenue Southeast St. Petersburg, Florida 33701-5095 Prepared for Sarasota Bay Estuary Program 111 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200W Sarasota, Florida 34236 March 17, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................. i LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................ iii LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................................... v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................ vii INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 9 METHODS .................................................................................................................................................. 11 Study Area .............................................................................................................................................. 11 Sampling Design .................................................................................................................................... 11 Gear Specifications and Deployment ..................................................................................................... 15 Sample Processing ................................................................................................................................ 16 RESULTS and DISCUSSION ..................................................................................................................... 19 Physiochemical conditions ..................................................................................................................... 19 Composition of overall nekton community ............................................................................................. 24 Shallow water habitats sampled with 21.3-m seines .......................................................................... 25 Nearshore habitats sampled with 183-m haul seines ........................................................................ 29 Deeper-water habitats sampled with 6.1-m otter trawls ..................................................................... 33 Species Profiles...................................................................................................................................... 36 Pink Shrimp, Farfantepenaeus duorarum .......................................................................................... 37 Blue crab, Callinectes sapidus ........................................................................................................... 41 Ladyfish, Elops saurus ....................................................................................................................... 45 Bay anchovy, Anchoa mitchilli ............................................................................................................ 47 Common Snook, Centropomus undecimalis ...................................................................................... 51 Gray Snapper, Lutjanus griseus ......................................................................................................... 53 Pinfish, Lagodon rhomboides ............................................................................................................. 57 Sheepshead, Archosargus probatocephalus ..................................................................................... 63 Spotted Seatrout, Cynoscion nebulosus ............................................................................................ 67 Striped Mullet, Mugil cephalus ........................................................................................................... 71 LITERATURE CITED .................................................................................................................................. 75 APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................................. 83 Appendix A. Animals designated as Selected Taxa because of their commercial or recreational importance. .................................................................................................................................... 85 i Appendix B. Summary of species collected, by sampling event (bi-monthly), during Sarasota Bay nekton sampling, June 2013 to April 2014. Effort, or total number of hauls, is labeled 'E'. Taxa are arranged alphabetically. Species of commercial or recreational importance (Selected Taxa) are denoted with an asterisk (*) after the species name. .................................... 87 Appendix C. Summary of species collected, by gear and stratum, during Sarasota Bay nekton sampling, June 2013 to April 2014. Effort, or the total number of hauls, is labeled 'E'. Taxa are arranged alphabetically. Species of commercial or recreational importance (Selected Taxa) are denoted with an asterisk (*) after the species name. .................................................... 93 Appendix D. Summary of species collected, by embayment, during Sarasota Bay stratified- random sampling, June 2013 to April 2014. Effort, or the total number of hauls, is labeled 'E'. Taxa are arranged alphabetically. Species of commercial or recreational importance (Selected Taxa) are denoted with an asterisk (*) after the species name ..................................... 99 Appendix E. Catch summary for taxa collected during five years, June 2009 to April 2014, of nekton sampling in Sarasota Bay with 21.3-m seines. Su is the density-weighted average salinity (salinity at each sampling site weighted by the number of animals collected). Taxa are arranged phylogenetically. Species of commercial or recreational importance (Selected Taxa) are denoted with an asterisk (*) after the species name. .................................................. 105 Appendix F. Catch summary for taxa collected during five years, June 2009 to April 2014, of nekton sampling in Sarasota Bay with 183-m haul seines. Su is the density-weighted average salinity (salinity at each sampling site weighted by the number of animals collected). Taxa are arranged phylogenetically. Species of commercial or recreational importance (Selected Taxa) are denoted with an asterisk (*) after the species name. ............... 109 Appendix G. Catch summary for taxa collected during five years, June 2009 to April 2014, of nekton sampling in Sarasota Bay with 6.1-m otter trawls. Su is the density-weighted average salinity (salinity at each sampling site weighted by the number of animals collected). Taxa are arranged phylogenetically. Species of commercial or recreational importance (Selected Taxa) are denoted with an asterisk (*) after the species name. ............... 113 Appendix H. Species overview plots for dominant taxa (≥200 animals collected and ≥10 occurrence in a gear type) collected in 21.3-m shoreline seines in Sarasota Bay, June 2009 to April 2014. Taxa are arranged phylogenetically. ..................................................................... 117 Appendix I. Species overview plots for dominant taxa (≥200 animals collected and ≥10 occurrence in a gear type) collected in 21.3-m offshore seines in Sarasota Bay, June 2009 to April 2014. Taxa are arranged phylogenetically. ..................................................................... 139 Appendix J. Species overview plots for dominant taxa (≥200 animals collected and ≥10 occurrence in a gear type) collected in 183-m haul seines in Sarasota Bay, June 2009 to April 2014. Taxa are arranged phylogenetically. ......................................................................... 159 Appendix K. Species overview plots for dominant taxa (≥200 animals collected and ≥10 occurrence in a gear type) collected in 6.1-m otter trawls in Sarasota Bay, June 2009 to April 2014. Taxa are arranged phylogenetically. ......................................................................... 177 ii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Stations sampled (dots) between June 2013 and April 2014 (Year 5), and geographic strata (solid lines) in Sarasota Bay. ................................................................................................................ 14 Figure 2. Temperature and total rainfall during the five years of the study (2009 - 2014) and during a thirty-year historical reference period (January 1979 to December 2008). Data are from Tampa International Airport (GHCND:USW00012842) and were downloaded from the National Climatic Data Center ((http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/search accessed on 03/06/2015). ................................. 20 Figure 3. Mean (±standard deviation) water temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen (water column average) by embayment, from the nekton sampling in Sarasota Bay, June 2009-April 2014. ............ 23 Figure 4. Relative abundance and length-frequency distribution of Pink Shrimp collected
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations Biological Sciences Summer 2016 Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes Christi Linardich Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Biology Commons, Environmental Health and Protection Commons, and the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Linardich, Christi. "Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes" (2016). Master of Science (MS), Thesis, Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/hydh-jp82 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds/13 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOTSPOTS, EXTINCTION RISK AND CONSERVATION PRIORITIES OF GREATER CARIBBEAN AND GULF OF MEXICO MARINE BONY SHOREFISHES by Christi Linardich B.A. December 2006, Florida Gulf Coast University A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE BIOLOGY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August 2016 Approved by: Kent E. Carpenter (Advisor) Beth Polidoro (Member) Holly Gaff (Member) ABSTRACT HOTSPOTS, EXTINCTION RISK AND CONSERVATION PRIORITIES OF GREATER CARIBBEAN AND GULF OF MEXICO MARINE BONY SHOREFISHES Christi Linardich Old Dominion University, 2016 Advisor: Dr. Kent E. Carpenter Understanding the status of species is important for allocation of resources to redress biodiversity loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Concentración Y Tiempo Máximo De Exposición De Juveniles De Pargo
    State of research of the Osteichthyes fish related to coral reefs in the Honduran Caribbean with catalogued records Estado del conocimiento de los peces osteíctios asociados a los arrecifes de coral en el Caribe de Honduras, con registros catalogados Anarda Isabel Salgado Ordoñez1, Julio Enrique Mérida Colindres1* & Gustavo Adolfo Cruz1 ABSTRACT Research on Honduran coral reef fish has been isolated and scattered. A list of fish species related to coral reefs was consolidated to establish a compiled database with updated taxonomy. The study was conducted between October 2017 and December 2018. Using primary and secondary sources, all potential species in the Western Atlantic were considered, and their actual presence was confirmed using catalogued records published in peer-reviewed journals that included Honduras. In addition, the specimens kept in the Museum of Natural History of Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras were added. Once the list was consolidated, the taxonomic status of each species was updated based on recent literature. A total of 159 species and 76 genera were registered in 32 families. The family with the most species was Labrisomidae with 27 species (17%). Five families had more than five 5 genera registered, while four 4 were represented by more than 16 species, which is equivalent to 42% genera and 51% species. Gobiidae was represented by 10 genera (13%) and 21 species (13%), of which two 2 were endemic: Tigrigobius rubrigenis and Elacatinus lobeli. In turn, Grammatidae was represented by one endemic species Lipogramma idabeli (1.8%). The species Diodon holocanthus and Sphoeroides testudineus represent the first catalogued records for Honduras.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of the Population Dynamics of Syngnathid Fishes Within Tampa Bay, Florida, USA
    Current Zoology 56 (1): 118−133, 2010 An examination of the population dynamics of syngnathid fishes within Tampa Bay, Florida, USA Heather D. MASONJONES1*, Emily ROSE1,2, Lori Benson McRAE1, Danielle L. DIXSON1,3 1 Biology Department, University of Tampa, Tampa, FL 33606, USA 2 Biology Department, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA 3 School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville QLD 4811, AU Abstract Seagrass ecosystems worldwide have been declining, leading to a decrease in associated fish populations, especially those with low mobility such as syngnathids (pipefish and seahorses). This two-year pilot study investigated seasonal patterns in density, growth, site fidelity, and population dynamics of Tampa Bay (FL) syngnathid fishes at a site adjacent to two marinas un- der construction. Using a modified mark-recapture technique, fish were collected periodically from three closely located sites that varied in seagrass species (Thalassia spp., Syringodium spp., and mixed-grass sites) and their distance from open water, but had consistent physical/chemical environmental characteristics. Fish were marked, photographed for body size and gender measure- ments, and released the same day at the capture site. Of the 5695 individuals surveyed, 49 individuals were recaptured, indicating a large, flexible population. Population density peaks were observed in July of both years, with low densities in late winter and late summer. Spatially, syngnathid densities were highest closest to the mouth of the bay and lowest near the shoreline. Seven species of syngnathid fishes were observed, and species-specific patterns of seagrass use emerged during the study. However, only two species, Syngnathus scovelli and Hippocampus zosterae, were observed at high frequencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Multispecies Coral Reef Fish Stock Assessment for the Dry Tortugas
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-487 Baseline Multispecies Coral Reef Fish Stock Assessment for the Dry Tortugas Jerald S. Ault, Steven G. Smith, Geoffrey A. Meester, Jiangang Luo, James A. Bohnsack, and Steven L. Miller U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Science Center 75 Virginia Beach Drive Miami, Florida 33149 August 2002 NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-487 Baseline Multispecies Coral Reef Fish Stock Assessment for the Dry Tortugas Jerald S. Ault 1, Steven G. Smith 1, Geoffrey A. Meester 1, Jiangang Luo 1, James A. Bohnsack 2 , and Steven L. Miller3 with significant contributions by Douglas E. Harper2, Dione W. Swanson3, Mark Chiappone3, Erik C. Franklin1, David B. McClellan2, Peter Fischel2, and Thomas W. Schmidt4 _____________________________ U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Donald L. Evans, Secretary National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr., Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere National Marine Fisheries Service William T. Hogarth, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries August 2002 This technical memorandum series is used for documentation and timely communication of preliminary results, interim reports, or special purpose information. Although the memoranda are not subject to complete formal review, editorial control, or detailed editing, they are expected to reflect sound professional work. 1 University of Miami, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Miami, FL 2 NOAA/Fisheries Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Miami, FL 3 National Undersea Research Center, Key Largo, FL 4 National Park Service, Homestead, FL NOTICE The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) does not approve, recommend, or endorse any proprietary product or material mentioned in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Waccasassa Bay Preserve State Park Approved UMP 2019
    Waccasassa Bay Preserve State Park Lead Agency: Department of Environmental Protection Division of Recreation and Parks Common Name of Property: Waccasassa Bay Preserve State Park Location: Levy County Direct Economic Impact: FY 17-18 $8,954,358 and 125 jobs added to local economy Acreage: 34,397.02 Acres Acreage Breakdown Natural Communities Acres Mesic Flatwoods 168.43 Scrubby Flatwoods 0.53 Basin Swamp 383.33 Depression Marsh 11.06 Hydric Hammock 7,608.71 Mangrove Swamp 311.73 Salt Marsh 19,460.20 Blackwater Stream 13.00 Estuarine Composite Substrate 6,374.70 Estuarine Mollusk Reef 55.91 Lease/Management Agreement Number(s): 2599 Use: Single Use Management Responsibilities Agency: Dept. of Environmental Protection, Division of Recreation and Parks Responsibility: Public Outdoor Recreation and Conservation Designated Land Use: Public outdoor recreation and conservation is the designated single use of the property Sublease: None Encumbrances: See Addendum 1 for details Type of Acquisition(s): I (see Addendum 1 for details). 1 Waccasassa Bay Preserve State Park Unique Features Overview: Waccasassa Bay Preserve State Park is located in Levy County. There is currently limited access to the park via land. Access to the park is primarily from water. Waccasassa Bay Preserve State Park was initially acquired on December 10, 1971 with funds from the Land Acquisition Trust Fund (LATF) and the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF). Currently, the park comprises 34,397.02 acres. The Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund (Trustees) hold fee simple title to the park and on April 6, 1972, the Trustees leased (Lease Number 2599) the property to DRP under a ninety-nine year lease.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft of Final Report
    FINAL REPORT SUMMARY INVENTORY OF MARINE AND FRESH WATER FISH OF PADRE ISLAND NATIONAL SEASHORE NPS COOP #H5000030550 TASK #J2115050019 by Leslie C. Smith & Elizabeth H. Smith Center for Coastal Studies Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi 6300 Ocean Drive NRC Building Suite 3200 Corpus Christi, Texas 78412 (361) 825-6069 [email protected] Submitted to: Whitney Granger National Park Service U.S. Department of Interior Gulf Coast Network Lafayette, Louisiana August 2007 TAMU-CC-0703-CCS Table of Contents Page List of figures……………………………………………………………………….. iii Formatted Table List of tables………………………………………………………………………… iv Abstract……………………………………………………………………………… vi Introduction…………………………………………………………………………. 1 Formatted: Font: 12 pt Project objectives……………………………………………………………………. 3 Methods……………………………………………………………………………... 4 Formatted Table Literature search…………………………………………………………………. 4 Voucher specimens……………………………………………………………… 4 Formatted: Font: 12 pt Results………………………………………………………………………………. 5 Literature search…………………………………………………………………. 5 Species checklist………………………………………………………………… 38 Voucher specimens……………………………………………………………… 48 Species accounts…………………………………………………………………….. 59 Summary…………………………………………………………………………….. 74 Literature cited………………………………………………………………………. 76 Appendix A…………………………………………………………………………. 78 Appendix B………………………………………………………………………….. 80 Appendix C………………………………………………………………………….. 81 Appendix D…………………………………………………………………………. 88 ii List of Figures Page Figure 1 Location of Padre Island National Seashore on the Texas Coast…… 2 Figure 2 Seasonal
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Species Within the CCBNEP Study Area: References, Habitats, Distribution, and Abundance
    Current Status and Historical Trends of the Estuarine Living Resources within the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Study Area Volume 4 of 4 Checklist of Species Within the CCBNEP Study Area: References, Habitats, Distribution, and Abundance Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program CCBNEP-06D • January 1996 This project has been funded in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement #CE-9963-01-2 to the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. The contents of this document do not necessarily represent the views of the United States Environmental Protection Agency or the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, nor do the contents of this document necessarily constitute the views or policy of the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Management Conference or its members. The information presented is intended to provide background information, including the professional opinion of the authors, for the Management Conference deliberations while drafting official policy in the Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP). The mention of trade names or commercial products does not in any way constitute an endorsement or recommendation for use. Volume 4 Checklist of Species within Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Study Area: References, Habitats, Distribution, and Abundance John W. Tunnell, Jr. and Sandra A. Alvarado, Editors Center for Coastal Studies Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi 6300 Ocean Dr. Corpus Christi, Texas 78412 Current Status and Historical Trends of Estuarine Living Resources of the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Study Area January 1996 Policy Committee Commissioner John Baker Ms. Jane Saginaw Policy Committee Chair Policy Committee Vice-Chair Texas Natural Resource Regional Administrator, EPA Region 6 Conservation Commission Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • A HIGH-RESOLUTION MOLECULAR METHOD for IDENTIFICATION of SMALLTOOTH SAWFISH PREY a Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Colleg
    A HIGH-RESOLUTION MOLECULAR METHOD FOR IDENTIFICATION OF SMALLTOOTH SAWFISH PREY A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences Florida Gulf Coast University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Master of Science By Taylor L. Hancock 2019 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment for the requirement for the degree of Master of Science ______________________________ Taylor L. Hancock Approved: Month, Day, 2019 _____________________________ Hidetoshi Urakawa, Ph.D. Committee Chair / Advisor ______________________________ S. Gregory Tolley, Ph.D. ______________________________ Gregg R. Poulakis, Ph.D. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above- mentioned discipline P a g e | i Acknowledgments I thank my family and friends for their constant support throughout my graduate career. Without this ever-present support network, I would not have been able to accomplish this research with such speed and dedication. Thank you to my wife Felicia for her compassion and for always being there for me. Thank you to my son Leo for being an inspiration and motivation to keep diligently working towards a better future for him, in sense of our own lives, but also the state of the environment we dwell within. Music also played a large part in accomplishing long nights of work, allowing me to push through long monotonous tasks to the songs of Modest Mouse, Alice in Chains, Jim Croce, TWRP, Led Zeppelin, and many others—to them I say thank you for your art.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded on 23 August 2010
    EVOLUTIONARY MORPHOLOGY OF THE EXTREMELY SPECIALIZED FEEDING APPARATUS IN SEAHORSES AND PIPEFISHES (SYNGNATHIDAE) Part l - Text Thesis submitted to obtain the degree Academiejaar 2010-2011 of Doctor in Sciences (Biology) Proefschrift voorgedragen tot het Rector: Prof. Dr. Paul van Cauwenberge bekomen van de graad van Doctor Decaan: Prof. Dr. Herwig Dejonghe in de Wetenschappen (Biologie) Promotor: Prof. Dr. Dominique Adriaens EVOLUTIONARY MORPHOLOGY OF THE EXTREMELY SPECIALIZED FEEDING APPARATUS IN SEAHORSES AND PIPEFISHES (SYNGNATHIDAE) Part l - Text Heleen Leysen Thesis submitted to obtain the degree Academiejaar 2010-2011 of Doctor in Sciences (Biology) Proefschrift voorgedragen tot het Rector: Prof. Dr. Paul van Cauwenberge bekomen van de graad van Doctor Decaan: Prof. Dr. Herwig Dejonghe in de Wetenschappen (Biologie) Promotor: Prof. Dr. Dominique Adriaens R e a d in g * a n d examination c o m m it t e e Prof. Dr. Luc Lens, voorzitter (Universiteit Gent, BE) Prof. Dr. Dominique Adriaens, promotor (Universiteit Gent, BE) Prof. Dr. Peter Aerts (Universiteit Antwerpen & Universiteit Gent, BE)* Prof. Dr. Patricia Hernandez (George Washington University, USA)* Dr. Anthony Herrei (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, FR)* Dr. Bruno Frédérich (Université de Liège, BE) Dr. Tom Geerinckx (Universiteit Gent, BE) Dankwoord Het schrijven van dit doctoraat was me niet gelukt zonder de hulp, raad en steun van een aantal mensen. Een woord van dank is hier dan ook gepast. Allereerst wil ik Prof. Dr. Dominique Adriaens bedanken voor alles wat hij de afgelopen jaren voor mij heeft gedaan. Er zijn veel zaken die het goede verloop van een doctoraat bepalen en de invloed van de promotor is volgens mij een niet te onderschatten factor.
    [Show full text]
  • Bayesian Node Dating Based on Probabilities of Fossil Sampling Supports Trans-Atlantic Dispersal of Cichlid Fishes
    Supporting Information Bayesian Node Dating based on Probabilities of Fossil Sampling Supports Trans-Atlantic Dispersal of Cichlid Fishes Michael Matschiner,1,2y Zuzana Musilov´a,2,3 Julia M. I. Barth,1 Zuzana Starostov´a,3 Walter Salzburger,1,2 Mike Steel,4 and Remco Bouckaert5,6y Addresses: 1Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway 2Zoological Institute, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland 3Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic 4Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand 5Department of Computer Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand 6Computational Evolution Group, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand yCorresponding author: E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 1 Supplementary Text 1 1 Supplementary Text Supplementary Text S1: Sequencing protocols. Mitochondrial genomes of 26 cichlid species were amplified by long-range PCR followed by the 454 pyrosequencing on a GS Roche Junior platform. The primers for long-range PCR were designed specifically in the mitogenomic regions with low interspecific variability. The whole mitogenome of most species was amplified as three fragments using the following primer sets: for the region between position 2 500 bp and 7 300 bp (of mitogenome starting with tRNA-Phe), we used forward primers ZM2500F (5'-ACG ACC TCG ATG TTG GAT CAG GAC ATC C-3'), L2508KAW (Kawaguchi et al. 2001) or S-LA-16SF (Miya & Nishida 2000) and reverse primer ZM7350R (5'-TTA AGG CGT GGT CGT GGA AGT GAA GAA G-3'). The region between 7 300 bp and 12 300 bp was amplified using primers ZM7300F (5'-GCA CAT CCC TCC CAA CTA GGW TTT CAA GAT GC-3') and ZM12300R (5'-TTG CAC CAA GAG TTT TTG GTT CCT AAG ACC-3').
    [Show full text]
  • 633766166006.Pdf
    Revista Ciencias Marinas y Costeras ISSN: 1659-455X ISSN: 1659-407X Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica Ordoñez, Anarda Isabel Salgado; Colindres, Julio Enrique Mérida; Cruz, Gustavo Adolfo Estado del conocimiento de los peces osteíctios asociados a los arrecifes de coral en el Caribe de Honduras, con registros catalogados Revista Ciencias Marinas y Costeras, vol. 11, núm. 2, 2019, Julio-, pp. 35-58 Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica DOI: https://doi.org/10.15359/revmar.11-2.3 Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=633766166006 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Redalyc Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina y el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto State of research of the Osteichthyes fish related to coral reefs in the Honduran Caribbean with catalogued records Estado del conocimiento de los peces osteíctios asociados a los arrecifes de coral en el Caribe de Honduras, con registros catalogados Anarda Isabel Salgado Ordoñez1, Julio Enrique Mérida Colindres1* & Gustavo Adolfo Cruz1 ABSTRACT Research on Honduran coral reef fish has been isolated and scattered. A list of fish species related to coral reefs was consolidated to establish a compiled database with updated taxonomy. The study was conducted between October 2017 and December 2018. Using primary and secondary sources, all potential species in the Western Atlantic were considered, and their actual presence was confirmed using catalogued records published in peer-reviewed journals that included Honduras. In addition, the specimens kept in the Museum of Natural History of Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras were added.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Inflow Effects on Fishes and Invertebrates in the Chassahowitzka River and Estuary
    FRESHWATER INFLOW EFFECTS ON FISHES AND INVERTEBRATES IN THE CHASSAHOWITZKA RIVER AND ESTUARY M.F.D. Greenwood1; E.B. Peebles2; S.E. Burghart2; T.C. MacDonald1; R.E. Matheson, Jr.1; R.H. McMichael, Jr.1 1Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute 100 Eighth Avenue Southeast St. Petersburg, Florida 33701-5095 2University of South Florida College of Marine Science 140 Seventh Avenue South St. Petersburg, Florida 33701-5016 Prepared for The Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, Florida 34609-6899 SWFWMD Agreement No. 05CON000117 September 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY...................................................................................................................... v LIST OF FIGURES..........................................................................................................xi LIST OF TABLES..........................................................................................................xiii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Objectives.................................................................................................. 2 2.0 METHODS............................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Study Area ................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Survey Design ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]