Socioeconomic Variability in Federal Period Overhill Cherokee Archaeological Assemblages Brett Ih Gh Riggs University of Tennessee - Knoxville

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Socioeconomic Variability in Federal Period Overhill Cherokee Archaeological Assemblages Brett Ih Gh Riggs University of Tennessee - Knoxville University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 3-1987 Socioeconomic Variability in Federal Period Overhill Cherokee Archaeological Assemblages Brett iH gh Riggs University of Tennessee - Knoxville Recommended Citation Riggs, Brett iH gh, "Socioeconomic Variability in Federal Period Overhill Cherokee Archaeological Assemblages. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1987. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/3543 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Brett iH gh Riggs entitled "Socioeconomic Variability in Federal Period Overhill Cherokee Archaeological Assemblages." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Gerald F. Schroedl, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Paul Parmalee, Jefferson Chapman Accepted for the Council: Dixie L. Thompson Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official student records.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Brett High Riggs entitled "Socioeconomic Variability in Federal Period Overbill Cherokee Archeological Assemblages." I have examined the final copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts , with a maj or in Anthropology. , terald F. Schroedl, Maj or Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Accepted for the Council: Vice Provost and·Dean of The.:;Gradul:!.te School STATEMENT OF PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulf ill.ment of the requirements for a Master's degree at The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, I agree that the Library shall make it available to borrowers under the rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgement of the source is made . Permission for extensive quotation from or reproduction of this thesis may be granted by my maj or professor, or in his absence, by the Head of Interlibrary Services when , in the opinion of either , the proposed use is for scholarly purposes . Any copying or use of the material in this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my wr itten permission. � Signature Date �4/?86 SOCIOECONOMIC VARIABILITY IN FEDERAL PERIOD OVERBILL CHEROKEE ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSEMBLAGES A Thesis Presented for the Master of Arts Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Brett High Riggs March 1987 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis is the product of the efforts, advice, and support of numerous people, institutions, and agencies. I extend my gratitude to the members of my committee, Dr. Gerald Schroedl, Dr. Paul Parmalee, and Dr. Jefferson Chapman, who patiently awaited completion of this thesis and accomodated my efforts in every respect. William Baden, Dr. Jan Simek, Dr. Clifford Boyd, and Ann Reed assisted and advised me in both technical and theoretical aspects of the quantitative analyses. Charles Hall provided invaluable aid and advice in the physical preparation of the text. Miles Wright prepared the photographic materials pictured in this thesis. Linda Carnes, Dr. Clifford Boyd, Thomas Whyte, Nancy Bell, David McMahan, and Sandra Raredon are credited with the analysis of material assemblages from the Bell Rattle Cabin Site. Dr. Paul Parmalee graciously made facilities available for the identification of the Bell Rattle Cabin Site faunal materials and lent his advice in this identification. Dr. William Dickinson assisted in the identification of fish remains from the Bell Rattle Cabin Site. Fieldwork at the Bell Rattle Cabin Site and analysis of the recovered materials were financed and supported as part of the Tennessee Valley Authority Contract No. TV-56255A. Much of the data used for this thesis was derived from records housed in the Frank H. McClung Museum at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. I gratefully acknowledge the role of the Tennessee Valley Authority, the National Park Service, the Department of Anthropology and the Museum for the recovery, curation and access to these data. ii I wish to extend my thanks to my friends, Thomas Whyte, Clifford Boyd, William Baden, Norman Jefferson, and Larry Kimball, who made my participation in the Department of Anthropology graduate program particularly enjoyable. My parents and family have been particularly supportive of my education and deserve my sincerest thanks. Host of all, my wife, Pandora Riggs, has patiently encouraged, supported, and assisted my anthropological endeavors. She has lent her professional expertise, her advice, her time, and interest toward completion of this thesis. Her love has continued when all else fails. Brett H. Riggs iii ABSTRACT During the early nineteenth century, Cherokee society rapidly evolved from its traditional state of social and economic homogeneity into a state of marked socioeconomic heterogeneity. This transformation is attributable to differential acculturation of Anglo-American economic strategies, material culture, and ideologies by various sectors of Cherokee society. Such socioeconomic heterogeneity is expected to be manifested in the archaeological record by a high degree of intercontextual variability in Federal Period Cherokee assemblages, contrasting with low levels of variability in Colonial Period Cherokee assemblages. This proposition is addressed in this study through comparative analysis of 13 Federal Period Cherokee assemblages, two Federal Period Anglo-American assemblages, and 43 late Colonial Period Cherokee assemblages derived from contexts in the Tellico Reservoir Archaeological Project area of eastern Tennessee. Patterns of material variability revealed in this analysis indicate a high degree of interassemblage variation among Federal Period Cherokee archaeological assemblages. This variation distinguishes Federal Period Cherokee assemblages most similar to contemporary Anglo-American farmstead assemblages from Federal Period assemblages most similar to the Colonial Period Cherokee sample. Most distinctive among the Federal Period Cherokee sample are assemblages from the Bell Rattle Cabin Site (40MR 211), a single family Cherokee farmstead dating 1800-1826. This site, the first of its type investigated in Tennessee, is reported in Appendixes B-G of this thesis. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE 1 I. INTRODUCTION.�----------------- - 1 Study Objectives.__ __________________________________ The Study Area�--------------------------------­ 3 6 The Study Period ---- �---------------------------- Materials and Me-t�hod s 6 Previous Historical Analyses of Cherokee Acculturation 8 -- ---- -------- --�------ --- Previous Archaeological� �� Research and� Analyses of� Overbill Cherokee Acculturation-------------------- 9 II. SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC BACKGROUND___________ _ 12 Pre-Revolutionary Patterns --------------- 12 ����� (1776-1794) __ 14 The Revolutionary Period ______________ (17 94-1824) 16 __ __ ___ The Federal Period _ __________ 32 Summary ____________ ____ ______ ____________________ III. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD 34 General Expectations 35 36 Material Dimensions of Socioeconomic Variability___ 67 Socioeconomic Variability in Settlement Patterning____ Summary of Archaeological Expectations 68 IV. ASSEMBLAGE ANALYSIS 72 Analysis Format 76 Diversity Analysis 81 Multivariate Analyses 85 Principal Components Analysis 86 Cluster Analysis 89 Canonical Discriminant Analysis 94 Summary and Conclusions 97 V. STUDY SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 105 LIST OF REFERENCES 113 APPENDIXES 125 APPENDIX A: ARTIFACT COMPOSITIONS OF STUDY ASSEMBLAGES 126 APPENDIX B: ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONTEXTS AND ASSEMBLAGES AT THE BELL RATTLE CABIN SITE (40MR 211) 128 Introduction 128 Site Location and Environs 128 Historic Background 130 Archaeological Fieldwork 132 v Material Assemblages from the Bell Rattle Cabin Site (40MR 211) 142 Discussion of the Federal Period Cherokee Component_ 16 1 Summary 166 APPENDIX C: ABORIGINAL CERAMICS FROM THE BELL RATTLE CABIN SITE (40MR 211) 167 APPENDIX D: EURO-AMERICAN ARTIFACTS FROM THE BELL RATTLE CABIN SITE (40MR 211) 17 1 APPENDIX E: FAUNAL REMAINS FROM THE BELL RATTLE CABIN SITE (40MR 211), FEATURE 1 17 4 APPENDIX F: ARCHAEOBOTANICAL REMAINS FROM THE BELL RATTLE CABIN SITE (40MR 211) 177 APPENDIX G: LITHIC ARTIFACTS FROM THE BELL RATTLE CABIN SITE (40MR 211) 180 VITA 189 vi LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 1. Archaeological Assemblages Included in the Comparative Analysis 73 2. Artifact Classification Format 77 3. Varimax Rotated Factor Pattern Matrix 88 4. Canonical Variate Structure 95 5. Artifact Class Profiles of Groups Defined in the Cluster Solution 100 vii LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 1. Map illustrating locations of sites included in the comparative analysis 4 2. Federal Period Cherokee communities in the Hiwassee District 5 3. Plot of assemblage sizes and class richness 83 4. Tree diagram illustrating Ward's cluster solution 90 5. Plot of cubic clustering criteria scores 91 6. Plot
Recommended publications
  • Cherokee Ethnogenesis in Southwestern North Carolina
    The following chapter is from: The Archaeology of North Carolina: Three Archaeological Symposia Charles R. Ewen – Co-Editor Thomas R. Whyte – Co-Editor R. P. Stephen Davis, Jr. – Co-Editor North Carolina Archaeological Council Publication Number 30 2011 Available online at: http://www.rla.unc.edu/NCAC/Publications/NCAC30/index.html CHEROKEE ETHNOGENESIS IN SOUTHWESTERN NORTH CAROLINA Christopher B. Rodning Dozens of Cherokee towns dotted the river valleys of the Appalachian Summit province in southwestern North Carolina during the eighteenth century (Figure 16-1; Dickens 1967, 1978, 1979; Perdue 1998; Persico 1979; Shumate et al. 2005; Smith 1979). What developments led to the formation of these Cherokee towns? Of course, native people had been living in the Appalachian Summit for thousands of years, through the Paleoindian, Archaic, Woodland, and Mississippi periods (Dickens 1976; Keel 1976; Purrington 1983; Ward and Davis 1999). What are the archaeological correlates of Cherokee culture, when are they visible archaeologically, and what can archaeology contribute to knowledge of the origins and development of Cherokee culture in southwestern North Carolina? Archaeologists, myself included, have often focused on the characteristics of pottery and other artifacts as clues about the development of Cherokee culture, which is a valid approach, but not the only approach (Dickens 1978, 1979, 1986; Hally 1986; Riggs and Rodning 2002; Rodning 2008; Schroedl 1986a; Wilson and Rodning 2002). In this paper (see also Rodning 2009a, 2010a, 2011b), I focus on the development of Cherokee towns and townhouses. Given the significance of towns and town affiliations to Cherokee identity and landscape during the 1700s (Boulware 2011; Chambers 2010; Smith 1979), I suggest that tracing the development of towns and townhouses helps us understand Cherokee ethnogenesis, more generally.
    [Show full text]
  • A Thirtieth Anniversary Gathering in Memory of the Little Tennessee
    Boston College Law School Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School Boston College Law School Faculty Papers 1-1-2010 Setting It Straight: A Thirtieth Anniversary Gathering in Memory of the Little eT nnessee River and its Valley Zygmunt J.B. Plater Boston College Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/lsfp Part of the Environmental Law Commons, and the Land Use Planning Commons Recommended Citation Zygmunt J.B. Plater, Setting It Straight: A Thirtieth Anniversary Gathering…in Memory of the Little Tennessee River and its Valley. Newton, MA: Z. Plater, 2010. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law School Faculty Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SSSeeettttttiiinnnggg IIIttt SSStttrrraaaiiiggghhhttt::: aaa TTThhhiiirrrtttiiieeettthhh AAAnnnnnniiivvveeerrrsssaaarrryyy GGGaaattthhheeerrriiinnnggg ......... iiinnn MMMeeemmmooorrryyy ooofff ttthhheee LLLiiittttttllleee TTTeeennnnnneeesssssseeeeee RRRiiivvveeerrr aaannnddd IIItttsss VVVaaalllllleeeyyy Created: 200,000,000 BC — eliminated by TVA: November 29, 1979 R.I.P. AAA RRReeeuuunnniiiooonnn ooofff TTTeeelllllliiicccooo DDDaaammm RRReeesssiiisssttteeerrrss::: fffaaarrrmmmeeerrrsss &&& lllaaannndddooowwwnnneeerrrsss,,, ssspppooorrrtttsssmmmeeennn,,, ttthhheee EEEaaasssttteeerrrnnn BBBaaannnddd ooofff CCChhheeerrroookkkeeeeeesss,,, &&& cccooonnnssseeerrrvvvaaatttiiiooonnniiissstttsss Vonore Community Center, Vonore, Tennessee, November 14, 2009 The Little Tennessee River: A Time-Line 200,000,000 BC — God raises up the Great Smoky Mountains, and the Little T starts flowing westward down out of the mountains. 8000 BC — archaic settlements arise in the meadows along the Little T in the rolling countryside West of the mountains. 1000-1400 AD — Early proto-Cherokee Pisgah culture; villages are scattered along the Little T.
    [Show full text]
  • Mississippian Architecture: Temporal, Technological, and Spatial Patterning of Structures at the Toqua Site (40M R6) Richard R
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-1985 Mississippian Architecture: Temporal, Technological, and Spatial Patterning of Structures at the Toqua Site (40M R6) Richard R. Polhemus University of Tennessee - Knoxville Recommended Citation Polhemus, Richard R., "Mississippian Architecture: Temporal, Technological, and Spatial Patterning of Structures at the Toqua Site (40M R6). " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1985. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/3320 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Richard R. Polhemus entitled "Mississippian Architecture: Temporal, Technological, and Spatial Patterning of Structures at the Toqua Site (40M R6)." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Charles H. Faulkner, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Gerald F. Schroedl, Jefferson Chapman Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official student records.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Richard R. Polhemus entitled 11Mississippian Architecture: Temporal , Technolog ical, and Spatial Patterning of Structures at the Toqua Site ( 40MR6) •11 I have examined the final copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts , with a major in Anthropology.
    [Show full text]
  • A Spatial and Elemental Analyses of the Ceramic Assemblage at Mialoquo (40Mr3), an Overhill Cherokee Town in Monroe County, Tennessee
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-2019 COALESCED CHEROKEE COMMUNITIES IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY: A SPATIAL AND ELEMENTAL ANALYSES OF THE CERAMIC ASSEMBLAGE AT MIALOQUO (40MR3), AN OVERHILL CHEROKEE TOWN IN MONROE COUNTY, TENNESSEE Christian Allen University of Tennessee, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Recommended Citation Allen, Christian, "COALESCED CHEROKEE COMMUNITIES IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY: A SPATIAL AND ELEMENTAL ANALYSES OF THE CERAMIC ASSEMBLAGE AT MIALOQUO (40MR3), AN OVERHILL CHEROKEE TOWN IN MONROE COUNTY, TENNESSEE. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2019. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/5572 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Christian Allen entitled "COALESCED CHEROKEE COMMUNITIES IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY: A SPATIAL AND ELEMENTAL ANALYSES OF THE CERAMIC ASSEMBLAGE AT MIALOQUO (40MR3), AN OVERHILL CHEROKEE TOWN IN MONROE COUNTY, TENNESSEE." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Kandace Hollenbach, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Gerald Schroedl, Julie Reed Accepted for the Council: Dixie L.
    [Show full text]
  • Descendants of Smallpox Conjurer of Tellico
    Descendants of Smallpox Conjurer of Tellico Generation 1 1. SMALLPOX CONJURER OF1 TELLICO . He died date Unknown. He married (1) AGANUNITSI MOYTOY. She was born about 1681. She died about 1758 in Cherokee, North Carolina, USA. He married (2) APRIL TKIKAMI HOP TURKEY. She was born in 1690 in Chota, City of Refuge, Cherokee Nation, Tennessee, USA. She died in 1744 in Upper Hiwasssee, Tennessee, USA. Smallpox Conjurer of Tellico and Aganunitsi Moytoy had the following children: 2. i. OSTENACO "OUTACITE" "USTANAKWA" "USTENAKA" "BIG HEAD" "MANKILLER OF KEOWEE" "SKIAGUSTA" "MANKILLER" "UTSIDIHI" "JUDD'S FRIEND was born in 1703. He died in 1780. 3. ii. KITEGISTA SKALIOSKEN was born about 1708 in Cherokee Nation East, Chota, Tennessee, USA. He died on 30 Sep 1792 in Buchanan's Station, Tennessee, Cherokee Nation East. He married (1) ANAWAILKA. She was born in Cherokee Nation East, Tennessee, USA. He married (2) USTEENOKOBAGAN. She was born about 1720 in Cherokee Nation East, Chota, Tennessee, USA. She died date Unknown. Notes for April Tkikami Hop Turkey: When April "Tikami" Hop was 3 years old her parents were murdered by Catawaba Raiders, and her and her 4 siblings were left there to die, because no one, would take them in. Pigeon Moytoy her aunt's husband, heard about this and went to Hiawassee and brought the children home to raise in the Cherokee Nation ( he was the Emperor of the Cherokee Nation, and also related to Cornstalk through his mother and his wife ). Visit WWW. My Carpenter Genealogy Smallpox Conjurer of Tellico and April Tkikami Hop Turkey had the following child: 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference # Resource Name Address County City Listed Date Multiple
    Reference # Resource Name Address County City Listed Date Multiple Name 76001760 Arnwine Cabin TN 61 Anderson Norris 19760316 92000411 Bear Creek Road Checking Station Jct. of S. Illinois Ave. and Bear Creek Rd. Anderson Oak Ridge 19920506 Oak Ridge MPS 92000410 Bethel Valley Road Checking Station Jct. of Bethel Valley and Scarboro Rds. Anderson Oak Ridge 19920506 Oak Ridge MPS 91001108 Brannon, Luther, House 151 Oak Ridge Tpk. Anderson Oak Ridge 19910905 Oak Ridge MPS 03000697 Briceville Community Church and Cemetery TN 116 Anderson Briceville 20030724 06000134 Cross Mountain Miners' Circle Circle Cemetery Ln. Anderson Briceville 20060315 10000936 Daugherty Furniture Building 307 N Main St Anderson Clinton 20101129 Rocky Top (formerly Lake 75001726 Edwards‐‐Fowler House 3.5 mi. S of Lake City on Dutch Valley Rd. Anderson 19750529 City) Rocky Top (formerly Lake 11000830 Fort Anderson on Militia Hill Vowell Mountain Rd. Anderson 20111121 City) Rocky Top (formerly Lake 04001459 Fraterville Miners' Circle Cemetery Leach Cemetery Ln. Anderson 20050105 City) 92000407 Freels Cabin Freels Bend Rd. Anderson Oak Ridge 19920506 Oak Ridge MPS Old Edgemoor Rd. between Bethel Valley Rd. and Melton Hill 91001107 Jones, J. B., House Anderson Oak Ridge 19910905 Oak Ridge MPS Lake 05001218 McAdoo, Green, School 101 School St. Anderson Clinton 20051108 Rocky Top (formerly Lake 14000446 Norris Dam State Park Rustic Cabins Historic District 125 Village Green Cir. Anderson 20140725 City) 75001727 Norris District Town of Norris on U.S. 441 Anderson Norris 19750710 Tennessee Valley Authority Hydroelectric 16000165 Norris Hydrolectric Project 300 Powerhouse Way Anderson Norris 20160412 System, 1933‐1979 MPS Roughly bounded by East Dr., W.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 4. Tennessee Radiocarbon Dates by County Site # Common
    Table 4. Tennessee Radiocarbon Dates by County Site # Common Name(s) Lab # B.P. S.D. Reference # TNDATE Protected 1 1st Unnamed Cave AA-15810 260 50 161:57 0001 Protected 1 1st Unnamed Cave Beta-103531 380 50 162:52 0002 Protected 1 2nd Unnamed Cave AA-15811 970 60 162:52 0003 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave SI-5067 4350 60 162:52; 163:669 0004 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave SI-5064 3115 65 162:52; 163:669 0005 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave Beta-96624 3060 50 162:52; 163:669 0006 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave Beta-114172 2970 40 162:52; 163:669 0007 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave Beta-114173 2970 40 162:52; 163:669 0008 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave SI-5066 2950 65 162:52; 163:669 0009 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave Beta-96623 2950 110 162:52; 163:669 0010 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave SI-5063 2805 75 162:52; 163:669 0011 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave SI-5065 2745 75 162:52; 163:669 0012 Protected 1 5th Unnamed Cave Beta-106695 2030 50 162:52 0013 Protected 1 6th Unnamed Cave Beta-109675 1890 50 162:52 0014 Protected 1 6th Unnamed Cave Beta-106697 630 50 162:52 0015 Protected 1 7th Unnamed Cave Beta-106698 1320 40 162:52 0016 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-13937 1030 90 160:149 0017 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-13938 620 150 160:149 0018 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-126032 750 60 160:149 0019 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-126033 680 60 160:149 0020 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-131221 560 60 160:149 0021 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta 134981 780 40 160:149 0022 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-134982 890 60 160:149 0023
    [Show full text]
  • The Judicial History of the Cherokee Nation from 1721 to 1835
    This dissertation has been 64—13,325 microfilmed exactly as received DICKSON, John L ois, 1918- THE JUDICIAL HISTORY OF THE CHEROKEE NATION FROM 1721 TO 1835. The University of Oklahoma, Ph.D., 1964 History, general University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE THE JUDICIAL HISTORY OF THE CHEROKEE NATION FROM 1721 TO 1835 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY JOHN LOIS DICKSON Norman, Oklahoma 1964 THE JUDICIAL HISTORY OF THE CHEROKEE NATION FROM 1721 TO 1835 APPROVED BY A M ^ rIfaA:. IÀ j ^CV ' “ DISSERTATION (XMHTTEE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Grateful acknowledgement is extended to the follow­ ing persons vdio have helped me both directly and indirectly: Miss Gabrille W. Jones and Mrs. H. H. Keene of the Thomas Gilcrease Institute of American History and Art, Ttilsa, Okla­ homa; Miss Sue Thorton and Mrs. Reba Cox of Northeastern State College, Tahlequah, Oklahoma; Miss Louise Cook, Mrs. Dorothy Williams, Mrs. Relia Looney, and Mrs. Mar on B. At­ kins of the Oklahoma Historical Society; and to Mrs. Alice Timmons of the Phillips Collection as well as the entire staff of the University of Oklahoma Library. Particularly, I would like to thank Mr. Raymond Pillar of Southeastern State College Library for his help in making materials avail­ able to me. I also wish to thank all members of my doctoral com­ mittee at the University of Oklahoma and also President Allen £• Shearer, Dr. James Morrison, and Dr. Don Brown of South­ eastern State College.
    [Show full text]
  • The Magic of Improbable Appendages Deer Antler Objects In
    Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 20 (2018) 888–895 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jasrep The magic of improbable appendages: Deer antler objects in the archaeological record of the American South T ⁎ Tanya M. Peresa, , Heidi Altmanb a Department of Anthropology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, United States b Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Georgia Southern University, P.O. Box 8051, Carroll Building, Rm. 1003, Statesboro, GA 30460, United States ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: In the American South white-tailed deer remains are recovered in abundance from late prehistoric archae- Ethnozooarchaeology ological sites and have been used to identify numerous social and cultural phenomena including status based Hunting amulet differences in food consumption, feasting, inter-site transport of foodstuffs, and regional variation in subsistence Antler strategies. Meat, marrow, bone, antler, and hide were important physical contributions of deer to the daily lives Velvet of southeastern native peoples. However, deer also play(ed) an important role in self-identity and social structure Cherokee (Deer clan). In this paper we bring together multiple lines of evidence to offer a nuanced interpretation of white- Deer tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) antler objects recovered from Native American archaeological sites in the pre- European Southeastern United States in the traditional homelands of the Cherokees of the American South. We review the importance of the culturally appropriate interactions with deer as taught in deer hunting lore and taboos recorded in ethnographic and ethnohistoric sources. With this understanding, we then identify the ma- terial manifestations of deer hunting amulets from several archaeological sites in our study area.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Loudoun
    Fort Loudoun Fort Loudoun, named in honor of John Campbell, the British commander-in-chief in North America and the 4th Earl of Loudoun, was a colonial American fort located on the banks of the Little Tennessee River near the Cherokee “capital” city of Chota (present-day Vonore, Monroe County). It was originally built during the French and Indian War (Seven Years War) at the request of the British-allied Cherokee warriors fighting the French-allied Shawnee Indians in the Ohio country as a means of protecting their women and children when the tribe’s warriors were fighting battles far from their homes. Ft. Loudoun was the first British fort of any significance west of the Appalachians. Drawing courtesy of Douglas Henry, TN State Parks (http://www.fortloudoun.com ) Virginians were desperate for the assistance of Cherokee warriors in their war against their French and Shawnee enemies. Reeling from a French and Indian victory over British forces under General Edward Braddock in western Pennsylvania, territory claimed by Virginia, the royal governors of Virginia and South Carolina agreed to construct a fort in the Overhill country as the price for Cherokee enlistment. The fort was to serve as a point of refuge for Cherokee women and children to protect them in the event that the French or French-allied Indians attacked during the absence of the Cherokee warriors, who would be away fighting on the behalf of the British and the colonists. But when the Virginians arrived in June 1756 to construct the fort, the South Carolinians were not present. Unaware that the South Carolinian construction team led by Sergeant William Gibbs was temporarily delayed by the appointment of a new governor, the Virginians pondered their next course.
    [Show full text]
  • Knoxville South Waterfront, Tennessee Public I Mprovements
    KNOXVILLE SOUTH WATERFRONT, TENNESSEE PUBLIC I MPROVEMENTS Cultural Context, Archaeological Research Design, and Phase I Survey Results for Cherokee Trail Connector/Spring Water Center and Baker Creek Landing, Knoxville South Waterfront Project DRAFT SAN FRANCISCO CAMBRIDGE NEW YORK LONDON APRIL 29, 2008 Cultural Context, Archaeological Research Design, and PhaseISurveyResultsforCherokeeTrailConnector/Spring WaterCenterandBakerCreekLanding, Knoxville South Waterfront Project, City of Knoxville, Knox County, Tennessee Report submitted to: Hargreaves and Associates • 118 Magazine Street • Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 Report prepared by: New South Associates • 6150 East Ponce de Leon Avenue • Stone Mountain, Georgia 30083 J. W. Joseph, PhD, RPA – Principal Investigator David Price – Historian and Co-Author R. Jeannine Windham, RPA – Archaeologist and Co-Author J. W. Joseph, PhD, RPA – Principal Investigator and Co-Author Hugh Matternes, PhD, RPA – Prehistoric Archaeologist and Co-Author Brad Botwick – Archaeologist and Co-Author April 29, 2008 • Draft Report New South Associates Technical Report #1591 ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE i KNOXVILLE SOUTH WATERFRONT PROJECT, KNOXVILLE, TENNESSEE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY The City of Knoxville, Knox County, Tennessee, has developed a plan for developing and enhancing areas south of the Tennessee River/Fort Loudon Lake. Known as the Knoxville South Waterfront Public Improvement Project, this plan represents a multi-year revitalization effort that will include 12 locations along the riverfront and adjacent uplands. The proposed undertakings require federal permitting from the Tennessee Valley Authority, which serves as the lead federal agency for the project, and US Army Corps of Engineers. As part of the permitting process, New South Associates, Inc., has developed cultural contexts for the Knoxville South Waterfront and compiled information on previously recorded cultural resources in the project vicinity.
    [Show full text]
  • Marcoux, Jon Bernard
    CHEROKEE HOUSEHOLDS AND COMMUNITIES IN THE ENGLISH CONTACT PERIOD, A.D. 1670-1740 Jon Bernard Marcoux A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology. Chapel Hill 2008 Approved by: Chair: Vincas Steponaitis Advisor: Brett Riggs Reader: Brian Billman Reader: C. Margaret Scarry Reader: John Scarry ©2008 Jon Bernard Marcoux ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT JON BERNARD MARCOUX: Cherokee Households and Communities in the English Contact Period, A.D. 1670-1740 (Under the direction of Vincas P. Steponaitis and Brett Riggs) This study focuses on issues of culture contact and the materialization of identity through an archaeological case study of a late seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century Cherokee community located in eastern Tennessee. The English Contact period (ca. A.D. 1670-1740) was an extremely turbulent time for southeastern Indian groups marked by disease, warfare, and population movements. I examine how this chaotic period played out in the daily lives of Cherokee households. I use primary and secondary sources to develop an historical context for the English Contact period in the southeastern United States. I introduce a reliable way to identify English Contact period Cherokee occupations using pottery and glass trade bead data. I also consult artifact data in order to identify patterns associated with change and stability in the activities of daily life within Cherokee households. I find that daily life in Cherokee households changed dramatically as they coped with the shifting social, political, and economic currents of the English Contact period.
    [Show full text]