DOCSLIB.ORG

Xerox Unfvershy Microfilms

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Xerox Unfvershy Microfilms INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Paga(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is oblitarated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand comer of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation. Silver prints of "photographs" may be ordered at additional charge by writing the Order Department, giving the catalog number, title, authorand specific pages you wish reproduced. 5. PLEASE NOTE: Some pages may have indistinct print. Filmed as received. Xerox UnfversHy Microfilms 300 North Zaeb Road Ann Artx>r, Michigan 48106 74-24,297 BASEHART, John Richard, 1936- THE DEVELOPMENT OF HENRY IRVING'S SHAKESPEAREAN STAGING DURING HIS EARLY YEARS AT THE LYCEUM THEATRE. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1974 Theater I University Microfilms, A XERWCompany, Ann Arbor. Michigan 0 1974 JOHN RICHARD BASEHART ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED. THE DEVELOPMENT OF HENRY IRVING'S SHAKESPEAREAN STAGING DURING HIS EARLY YEARS AT THE LYCEUM THEATRE DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By John Richard Basehart, B.A., M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 1974 Reading Committee: Approved by Professor John C. Morrow Professor Roy H. Bowen Professor Alan Woods Adviser Department of Theatre ACKNOWLEDGMENTS For providing a microfilm of one of the prompt­ books used in this study and for permission to use illus­ trations from it, I wish to thank Dr. Levi Fox, Director of The Shakespeare Centre, Ctratford-upon-Avon. Also, I thank Dr. Jeanne Newlin and Ms. Martha R. Mahard for per­ mission to examine the 1874 Hamlet promptbook and other material at the Harvard Theatre Collection. Also, I appreciate the efforts of the curator of The Ellen Terry Memorial Museum at Smallhythe in providing material for me. In addition, I would like to thank Mr. William E. Miller for his kind assistance when I visited the Horace Howard Furness Memorial Library at the University of Pennsylvania. I am also indebted to The Ohio State University Theatre Research Institute for their help in acquiring additional material, and to the Graduate Committee of the Department of Theatre for providing funds for travel expenses encountered in the research. I owe special thanks to Dr. Alan Woods for his patience and guidance in the development of this disserta­ tion, and to Dr. John C. Morrow and Dr. Roy H. Bowen for their help and encouragement with this study and through­ out ny years of graduate work at The Ohio State University. ii VITA November 25, 1936 B o m - Newcomers town, Ohio 1962........... B.A., Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 1962-1963 .... Director of Family Plays, Division of Theatre, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 1963-1966 .... Teaching Associate, Department of Theatre, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 1965........... M.A., Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 1966-1968 .... Instructor of Speech and Theatre, Wagner College, Staten Island, New York 1968-1969 .... Teaching Associate, Department of Theatre, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 1969-1973 .... Academic Advisor, University College, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 1973-1974 .... Assistant to the College Secretary, University College, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Theatre Theatre History and Criticism. Professors John H. McDowell and John C. Morrow Dramatic Literature. Professor John C. Morrow vita (Continued) Theatre Production. Professor Roy H. Bowen Rhetoric. Professor Harold P. Harding Speech-Communication. Professor Franklin H. Knower XV t a b l e of c o n t e n t s Page acknowledgments .......................... ii VITA............................................. iii LIST OF TABLES. ............................ vii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS........................... viii Chapter I. INTRODUCTION............................ 1 The Research Topic and Purpose Methodology A Review of Previous Research The Research Documents II. THE HAMLET PRODUCTION OF 1874 ........... 14 Introduction An Analysis of the Directorial Aspects Summary III. THE MACBETH PRODUCTION OF 1875........... 114 Introduction An Analysis of the Directorial Aspects Summary IV. THE RICHARD III PRODUCTION OF 1877....... 142 Introduction An Analysis of the Directorial Aspects Summary 4% Table of Contents (Continued) Chapter Page V. THE HRiNILET PRODUCTION OF 1878............ 171 Introduction An Analysis of the Directorial Aspects Summary VI. CONCLUSIONS............................... 233 BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................... 257 VI LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 Comparison of Scene Length of the Standard Text of Hamlet and Irving's Version. 89 2 List of Scenes Showing Groove Placement. 104 3 Comparison of Scene Length of the Standard Text of Macbeth and Irving's Version . 121 4 Comparison of Scene Length of the Standard Text of Richard III and Irving's Version . 152 5 Comparison of Scene Length of the Standard Text of Hamlet and Irving's 1874 and 1878 Acting Versions .................. 221 V I 1 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Plate Page I Floorplan of Entrance and Groove Locations of the Lyceum Theatre Stage. .........27 II Setting for Hamlet (1874), Act I, Scene ii . 33 III Sketch of Floorplan for Hamlet (1874), Act I, Scene ii. .................. 39 IV Setting for Hamlet (1874), Act II, Scene ii. 53 V Sketch of Floorplan for Hamlet (1874), Act III, Scene i ....................... 57 VI Hamlet with Torch, Act III, Scene ii .... 66 VII Sketch of Floorplan for Hamlet (1874), Act III, Scene i i i ..................... 69 VIII Sketch of Floorplan for Hamlet (1874), Act V, Scene i ......................... 78 IX Sketch of Floorplan for Hamlet (1874), Act V, Scene i i i ....................... 83 X Irving as Macbeth, Act I I I ................ 138 XI Floorplan for Hamlet (1878), Act I, Scene i i .............................. 185 XII Setting for Forbes-Robertson's Hamlet (1913) , Act I, Scene i i i ............... 187 XIII Drawing of Ghost, Act I, Scene v .......... 194 XIV Sketch of Floorplan for Hamlet (1874), Act II, Scene i i .............. .200 XV Floorplan for Hamlet (1878), Act II, Scene i i .............................. 202 XVI Floorplan for Hamlet (1878), Act III, Scene i ................................ 206 viii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION The Research Topic and Purpose The importance of Henry Irving, who for more than twenty years was one of the most prominent figures in the English theatre, is well established. He was the first of his profession to be honored with knighthood; the inno­ vator of many creative interpretations of Shakespearean roles; the culminator of the nineteenth century trend in scenic embellishment of Shake spe are an plays; and, the actor-manager who stood at the threshold of the develop­ ment of the modem stage director. The achievements of Henry Irving are well known, and are fairly well recorded in the history of theatre. His work as an actor from his early days in the provinces to his farewell tours is the subject of several biographies and other works: the stag­ ing of Irving's magnificent productions of the 1880's and later has also received recognition. Very little, however, is known of his early years as a director of plays before he assumed the management of the Lyceum Theatre. The purpose of this inquiry is to examine Irving's eaurly years as a director of Shakespearean plays. Speci­ fically, this study examines Irving's first Shakespearean production under the management of Hezekiah Bateman and concludes with his first production under his own manage­ ment. The productions examined are Hamlet (1874), Macbeth (1875), Richard III (1877), and Hamlet ( 1 8 7 8 ) By exam­ ining these productions, this study is intended to estab­ lish an understanding of the nature of Irving’s development as a director of Shakespearean plays, a hitherto unexamined subject. An appreciation of his early work, before he fully developed his style of Shake spe are an production for which he is remembered, will provide a foundation for tracing Irving's later development; and, perhaps help to answer such questions as what effect the Meiningen player's performances at the Drury Lane Theatre in 1881 may have had on Irving's productions? The rise of the actor-manager was a phenomenon of the nineteenth century theatre, and Irving's development 4rhe only Shakespearean play produced during this period that is not treated in this study is the 1876 pro­ duction of Othello. This play is omitted because of the lack of research material— specifically, no promptbooks have survived, and the press took comparatively little notice of it. In addition, the production only had a limited run.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Session 3 - the Difference Jesus Makes
    Session 3 - The difference Jesus makes Session 3 - The difference Jesus makes Aims and outcomes You will need: Take time to think about and pray over each member l Fabric and other props to create the Easter story of the group, holding them before God and praying that scene their needs are met. Think about how well the group is l Name and locations for the Good Friday story gelling, and whether people are sticking to the ground scene (see pp. 17-18) rules (Compass, p. 5). Are any gentle reminders needed? l Cross (to include in the Good Friday story scene) Is there someone needing extra attention? Perhaps a l Candle (and matches) mentor to talk to? l Three or four copies of newspapers from this week Remind people briefly of the last session, when they l Chalice and paten (plate), bread and wine looked at the life of Jesus. Invite them to think about l Words describing difference Jesus makes on the their reflections at the end of the last session on what Cross (see pp. 19-21). it means to be transformed (Compass, p. 27). What are l Scissors to cut the words and names out (If you their questions at this point? have time they could be backed and made to stand up. But laying them on the scene works just This session will help participants reflect on different as well.) ways we try to understand the meaning of Jesus’ death. l Pens We can only get so far in looking for rational reasons l Bowl for the meaning of Jesus’ death.
    [Show full text]
  • Langue Et Altérité Dans La Culture De La Renaissance
    s s e e r n u t r l e u h t U CŒUR DE L ORGANISATION SOCIALE de la Grèce antique et C ’ O e c de l’institution théâtrale s’inscrivait Dionysos, « la figure de d n n l’Autre » par excellence (Louis Gernet). Le théâtre a a A s s élisabéthain, quant à lui, plaçait le festif ou l’Altérité prohibée dans e i g un lieu alternatif, de l’autre côté de la Tamise, comme pour mieux a a n e confronter la ville au-delà de ses frontières. Entre les murs du théâtre, u g R les garçons jouaient les rôles de femmes — fait unique en Europe à n n langue et altérité a l’époque — alors que le langage était lui-même « autre », un i mélange instable d’idiomes naturels et les langues vernaculaires L issues des cultures dominantes d’Europe continentale, marquant la disparition progressive de la langue de l’« Église d’Antan », le latin, dans la culture de la renaissance de plus en plus souvent perçu comme la langue de l’Autre suprême, le Pape Antéchrist. Ce volume tente de montrer la diversité topologique de l’Altérité dans la culture de la Renaissance en s’intéressant à la fois à la langue « autre » (la calomnie, l’insulte, le jargon des colporteurs, la e Language and Otherness in Renaissance Culture traduction, la prophétie), comme aux figures de l’« Autre » (le c fantôme, le bâtard, le garçon acteur travesti, l’homme des bois…) n a s s i In Ancient Greece, the institution of the theatre marked the a é n installation, at the centre of society, of Dionysus, “the figure of the t i textes réunis par e Other” par excellence (Louis Gernet).
    [Show full text]
  • Dame Ellen Terry GBE
    Dame Ellen Terry GBE Key Features • Born Alice Ellen Terry 27 February 1847, in Market Street, Coventry • Married George Frederic Watts, artist 20 February 1864 in Kensington. Separated 1864. Divorced 13 March 1877 • Eloped with Edward William Godwin, architect in 1868 with whom she had two children – Edith (b1869) and Edward Gordon (b1872). Godwin left Ellen in early 1875. • Married Charles Kelly, actor 21 November 1877 in Kensington. Separated 1881. Marriage ended by Kelly’s death on 17 April 1885. • Married James Carew, actor 22 March 1907 in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, USA. Unofficially separated 1909. • Died 21 July 1928 Smallhythe Place. Funeral service at Smallhythe church. Cremation at Golders Green Crematorium, London. Ashes placed in St Paul’s Covent Garden (the actors’ church). Urn on display on south wall (east end). A brief marital history Ellen Terry married three times and, between husbands one and two, eloped with the man who Ellen Terry’s first marriage was to the artist G F Watts. She was a week shy of 17 years old, young and exuberant, and he was a very neurotic and elderly 46. They were totally mismatched. Within a year he had sent her back to her family but would not divorce her. When she was 21, Ellen Terry eloped with the widower Edward Godwin and, as a consequence, was estranged from her family. Ellen said he was the only man she really loved. They had two illegitimate children, Edith and Edward. The relationship foundered after 6 or 7 years when they were overcome by financial problems resulting from over- expenditure on the house that Godwin had designed and built for them in Harpenden.
    [Show full text]
  • Uhm Phd 9205877 R.Pdf
    · INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewri~er face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikeiy event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact liMI directly to order. U-M-I University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, M148106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Order Number 9205811 Political economy of passion: Tango, exoticism, and decolonization Savigliano, Marta Elena, Ph.D. University of Hawaii, 1991 Copyright @1991 by Savigliano, Marta Elena.
    [Show full text]
  • A Moor Propre: Charles Albert Fechter's Othello
    A MOOR PROPRE: CHARLES ALBERT FECHTER'S OTHELLO A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Matthew Scott Phillips, B.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University •· 1992 Thesis Committee: Approved by Alan Woods Joy Reilly Adviser Department of Theatre swift, light-footed, and strange, with his own dark face in a rage,/ Scorning the time-honoured rules Of the actor's conventional schools,/ Tenderly, thoughtfully, earnestly, FECHTER comes on to the stage. (From "The Three Othellos," Fun 9 Nov. 1861: 76.} Copyright by Matthew Scott Phillips ©1992 J • To My Wife Margaret Freehling Phillips ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I express heartfelt appreciation to the members of my thesis committee: to my adviser, Dr. Alan Woods, whose guidance and insight made possible the completion of this thesis, and Dr. Joy Reilly, for whose unflagging encouragement I will be eternally grateful. I would also like to acknowledge the invaluable services of the British Library, the Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee Theatre Research Institute and its curator, Nena Couch. The support and encouragement given me by my family has been outstanding. I thank my father for raising my spirits when I needed it and my mother, whose selflessness has made the fulfillment of so many of my goals possible, for putting up with me. Finally, I would like to thank my wife, Maggie, for her courage, sacrifice and unwavering faith in me. Without her I would not have come this far, and without her I could go no further.
    [Show full text]
  • 15/7/39 Liberal Arts and Sciences Department of English Charles H
    The materials listed in this document are available for research at the University of Record Series Number Illinois Archives. For more information, email [email protected] or search http://www.library.illinois.edu/archives/archon for the record series number. 15/7/39 Liberal Arts and Sciences Department of English Charles H. Shattuck Papers, 1929, 1937-92 CONTENTS Box Correspondence, A-Z, 1944-61 1 Correspondence, A-Z, 1961-92 2-6 Subject File, A-W, 1929, 1946-91 6-10 Accent File, A-W, 1942-79 10 Shattuck Promptbooks, 1942-77 10-14 Playbills, 1913-88 14-15 Publications & Reviews, 1938-86 15-16 Research Notes & Correspondence, 1937-92 Macready & Booth 16-17 Shakespeare Promptbooks 17-21 Shakespeare on the American Stage 21-22 Theatre and Brecht 23 Posters & Slides 24 Box 1: Correspondence, 1944-61 A, 1946-58 Adams, John C. 1945-58, 1960 B, 1947-60 Brecht, Bertolt, 1955 C, 1947-60 D, 1946-59 E, 1946-60 Engle, Paul, 1946-56 F, 1945-60 Ford Foundation, W. McNeil Lowry, 1958-59 G, 1945-60 Gregor, Arthur, 1951-54 H, 1943-60 Harrison, G.B., 1957-58 Hewitt, Barnard, 1947-56 Hanson, Philip, 1951-57 I-K, 1942, 1947-61 L, 1946-60 M, 1944-61 15/7/39 2 N-O, 1949-60 P, 1949-60 Q, 1958-60 R, 1944-64 Sa-Sh, 1948-61 Sl-Sy, 1943-60 Stoddard, Margaret, 1954-55 Swanson, John Wesley, 1946-59 T, 1946-60 U-V, 1948-61 Vassar College, 1948-49 W, 1946-60 Wallace, Karl, 1947-49 X-Z, 1953-59 Box 2: Correspondence, 1961-92 A, 1961-92 Abou-Saif, Laila, 1964-69, 1978 Adams, John C., 1961-85 Andrews, John F., 1976-91 Andrews, Kenneth R., 1963-91 Archer, Stephen,
    [Show full text]
  • Theater Souvenir Programs Guide [1881-1979]
    Theater Souvenir Programs Guide [1881-1979] RBC PN2037 .T54 1881 Choose which boxes you want to see, go to SearchWorks record, and page boxes electronically. BOX 1 1: An Illustrated Record by "The Sphere" of the Gilbert & Sullivan Operas 1939 (1939). Note: Operas: The Mikado; The Goldoliers; Iolanthe; Trial by Jury; The Pirates of Penzance; The Yeomen of the Guard; Patience; Princess Ida; Ruddigore; H.M.S. Pinafore; The Grand Duke; Utopia, Limited; The Sorcerer. 2: Glyndebourne Festival Opera (1960). Note: 26th Anniversary of the Glyndebourne Festival, operas: I Puritani; Falstaff; Der Rosenkavalier; Don Giovanni; La Cenerentola; Die Zauberflöte. 3: Parts I Have Played: Mr. Martin Harvey (1881-1909). Note: 30 Photographs and A Biographical Sketch. 4: Souvenir of The Christian King (Or Alfred of "Engle-Land"), by Wilson Barrett. Note: Photographs by W. & D. Downey. 5: Adelphi Theatre : Adelphi Theatre Souvenir of the 200th Performance of "Tina" (1916). 6: Comedy Theatre : Souvenir of "Sunday" (1904), by Thomas Raceward. 7: Daly's Theatre : The Lady of the Rose: Souvenir of Anniversary Perforamnce Feb. 21, 1923 (1923), by Frederick Lonsdale. Note: Musical theater. 8: Drury Lane Theatre : The Pageant of Drury Lane Theatre (1918), by Louis N. Parker. Note: In celebration of the 21 years of management by Arthur Collins. 9: Duke of York's Theatre : Souvenir of the 200th Performance of "The Admirable Crichton" (1902), by J.M. Barrie. Note: Oil paintings by Chas. A. Buchel, produced under the management of Charles Frohman. 10: Gaiety Theatre : The Orchid (1904), by James T. Tanner. Note: Managing Director, Mr. George Edwardes, musical comedy.
    [Show full text]
  • Irving Room David Garrick (1717-1779) Nathaniel Dance-Holland (1735-1811) (After) Oil on Canvas BORGM 00609
    Russell-Cotes Paintings – Irving Room Irving Room David Garrick (1717-1779) Nathaniel Dance-Holland (1735-1811) (after) Oil on canvas BORGM 00609 Landscape with a Cow by Water Joseph Jefferson (1829-1905) Oil on canvas BORGM 01151 Sir Henry Irving William Nicholson Print Irving is shown with a coat over his right arm and holding a hat in one hand. The print has been endorsed 'To My Old Friend Merton Russell Cotes from Henry Irving'. Sir Henry Irving, Study for ‘The Golden Jubilee Picture’, 1887 William Ewart Lockhard (1846-1900) Oil in canvas BORGM 01330 Russell-Cotes Paintings – Irving Room Sir Henry Irving in Various Roles, 1891 Frederick Barnard (1846-1896) Ink on paper RC1142.1 Sara Bernhardt (1824-1923), 1897 William Nicholson (1872-1949) Woodblock print on paper The image shows her wearing a long black coat/dress with a walking stick (or possibly an umbrella) in her right hand. Underneath the image in blue ink is written 'To Sir Merton Russell Cotes with the kind wishes of Sara Bernhardt'. :T8.8.2005.26 Miss Ellen Terry, Study for ‘The Golden Jubilee Picture’, 1887 William Ewart Lockhart (1846-1900) Oil on canvas BORGM 01329 Theatre Poster, 1895 A theatre poster from the Borough Theatre Stratford, dated September 6th, 1895. Sir Henry Irving played Mathias in The Bells and Corporal Brewster in A Story of Waterloo. :T23.11.2000.26 Russell-Cotes Paintings – Irving Room Henry Irving, All the World’s a Stage A print showing a profile portrait of Henry Irving entitled ‘Henry Irving with a central emblem of a globe on the frame with the wording ‘All The World’s A Stage’ :T8.8.2005.27 Casket This silver casket contains an illuminated scroll which was presented to Sir Henry Irving by his friends and admirers from Wolverhampton, in 1905.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dramatic Space of Hamlet's Theatre
    Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 4, 1 (2012) 59-75 “The Play’s the Thing” The Dramatic Space of Hamlet’s Theatre Balázs SZIGETI Eötvös Loránd University Department of English Studies [email protected] Abstract. In my paper I investigate the use of the dramatic space in Shakespeare’s Hamlet. The tragedy will be observed with the method of “pre-performance criticism,” which first and foremost makes use of the several potentials a play contains and puts on display before an actual performance; it offers, also in the light of the secondary literature, various ways of interpretation, resulting from the close-reading of the play and considers their possible realizations in the space of the stage both from the director’s and the actor’s point of view, including the consequences the respective lines of interpretation may have as regards the play as a whole. Hamlet does not only raise the questions of the theatrical realization of a play but it also reflects on the ontology of the dramatic space by putting the performance of The Mousetrap-play into one of its focal points and scrutinises the very interaction between the dramatic space and the realm of the audience. I will discuss the process how Hamlet makes use of his private theatre and how the dramatic space is transformed as The Murder of Gonzago turns into The Mousetrap-performance. Keywords: Hamlet; The Mousetrap; dramatic space; pre-performance criticism Shakespeare’s Hamlet1 does not only raise the questions of the theatrical realization of a play but it also reflects on the ontology of the dramatic space by putting the performance of The Mousetrap-play into one of its focal points and 1 In the present paper I quote the play according to the Norton Shakespeare edition (Greenblatt et.
    [Show full text]
  • Iv: the Allan Wilkie Shakespearean Company, 1920-1926
    IV: THE ALLAN WILKIE SHAKESPEAREAN COMPANY, 1920-1926 "Our True Intent is all for Your Delight." In September 1920, Allan Wilkie announced his plans to establish Australia's first permanent Shakespearean company, drawing a parallel to Frank Benson's Company in England. The inaugural production by the new Allan Wilkie Shakespearean Company was to be a "new arrangement" of Macbeth, and Wilkie gave it as his fixed intention to produce all thirty-seven of Shakespeare's plays, some of which had never previously been staged in Australia." Advance publicity emphasized the potentially historic nature of the occasion: When in future years this company will be counted one of the institutions of which Australia is proud, those who attend on the opening night will tell with satisfaction how they were present during the enthusiastic hours which saw the inception of the company [Argus, 9 September 1920]. Many cynics were quick to point out the unlikelihood of Wilkie's venture surviving for long, or even getting off the ground, in view of the history of Shakespeare production in Australia. His was by no means the first proposal to establish a permanent company, but lack of demand had ended all previous efforts. In order to arouse audience curiosity, Wilkie advertised, as mentioned above, a "new arrangement" of Macbeth. His presentation was to have two novel aspects, which were to form the basis of his production methods in the years to come. They were interdependent: first, a new method of scenic arrangement, and second, a new organisation of the play, made possible by simplified scenery.
    [Show full text]
  • CYMBELINE" in the Fllii^Slhi TI CENTURY
    "CYMBELINE" IN THE fllii^SLHi TI CENTURY Bennett Jackson Submitted in partial fulfilment for the de ree of uaster of Arts in the University of Birmingham. October 1971. University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. SYNOPSIS This thesis consists of an Introduction, followed by Part I (chapters 1-2) in which nineteenth- century criticism of the play is discussed, particular attention being paid to Helen Faucit's essay on Imogen, and its relationship to her playing of the role. In Part II the stags-history of Oymbcline in London is traced from 1785 to Irving's Lyceum production of 1896. Directions from promptbooks used by G-.P. Cooke, W.C. Macready, Helen Eaucit, and Samuel ±helps are transcribed and discussed, and in the last chapter the influence of Bernard Shaw on Ellen Terry's Imogen is considered in the light of their correspondence and the actress's rehearsal copies of the play. There are three appendices: a list of performances; transcriptions of two newspaper reviews (from 1843 and 1864) and one private diary (Gordon Crosse's notes on the Lyceum Gymbeline); and discussion of one of the promptbooks prepared for Charles Kean's projected production.
    [Show full text]
  • Unpinning Desdemona Author(S): Denise A
    George Washington University Unpinning Desdemona Author(s): Denise A. Walen Source: Shakespeare Quarterly, Vol. 58, No. 4 (Winter, 2007), pp. 487-508 Published by: Folger Shakespeare Library in association with George Washington University Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4625012 . Accessed: 22/03/2013 08:40 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Folger Shakespeare Library and George Washington University are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Shakespeare Quarterly. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 140.233.2.215 on Fri, 22 Mar 2013 08:40:27 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Unpinning Desdemona DENISEA. WALEN ONE OF THE MORE STRIKING DIFFERENCES betweenthe quarto(1622) and the FirstFolio (1623) texts of Othellois in the scene(4.3) thatpresages Desdemona'smurder as Emiliaundresses her and prepares her for bed. While F unfoldsthrough a leisurely112 linesthat include the WillowSong, Q clips alongwith only 62 lines,cutting the sceneby nearlyhalf.1 These two versions also differthematically. F presentsboth Desdemonaand Emiliaas complex characters.By delvingdeeply into her feelings,it portraysan activeand tragically nuancedDesdemona and raisesempathy for her with its psychologicalexpos6.
    [Show full text]