DOCSLIB.ORG

JTF-GTMO Detainee Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
JTF-GTMO Detainee Assessment S E C R E T / / NOFORN / / 20330625 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HEADQUARTERS, JOINT TASK FORCE GUANTANAMO U.S. NAVAL STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA APO AE 09360 JTF-GTMO-CDR 25 June 2008 MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, United States Southern Command, 3511 NW 9lst Avenue, Miami, FL 33172 SUBJECT: Recommendation for Continued Detention Under DoD Control (CD) for Guantanamo Detainee, ISN PK9SA-001456DP (S) JTF-GTMO Detainee Assessment 1. (S//NF) Personal Information: • JDIMS/NDRC Reference Name: Hassan Ali Bin Attash • Current/True Name and Aliases: Hassan Muhammad Ali Bin Attash, Amar al-Baluch, al-Mughayrah, al-Muhannad al-Jiddawi, Umayr Bin Attash, Umayr al-Gharib, Umayr, Sayyid Nur, Abd al-Sattar Khan, Hasan Muhammad Saleh al-Dini Umayr • Place of Birth: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia (SA) • Date of Birth: 1985 • Citizenship: Saudi Arabia • Internment Serial Number (ISN): PK9SA-001456DP 2. (U//FOUO) Health: Detainee is in overall good health. 3. (U) JTF-GTMO Assessment: a. (S) Recommendation: JTF-GTMO recommends this detainee for Continued Detention Under DoD Control (CD). JTF-GTMO previously recommended detainee for Continued Detention Under DoD Control (CD) on 3 August 2007. b. (S//NF) Executive Summary: Detainee is a member of al-Qaida. He traveled to Afghanistan (AF) under the influence of his older brothers, one of whom, Walid Muhammad Salih Bin Attash, aka (Khallad), aka (Silver), ISN US9YM-010014DP (YM-10014), was a senior al-Qaida member. Detainee reportedly swore bayat (oath of loyalty) to UBL and was a member of UBL’s security detail. Detainee worked closely with senior level al-Qaida CLASSIFIED BY: MULTIPLE SOURCES REASON: E.O. 12958, AS AMENDED, SECTION 1.4(C) DECLASSIFY ON: 20330625 S E C R E T / / NOFORN / / 20330625 Downloaded from The Rendition Project www.therenditionproject.org.uk Source: the New York Times S E C R E T / / NOFORN / / 20330625 JTF-GTMO-CDR SUBJECT: Recommendation for Continued Detention Under DoD Control (CD) for Guantanamo Detainee, ISN PK9SA-001456DP (S) operatives and admitted having advance knowledge of attack plots. Detainee is a close associate of senior al-Qaida operative and maritime operational planner Abd al-Rahim Hussayn Muhammad al-Nashiri, aka (Mullah Bilal), ISN US9SA-010015DP (SA-10015). Detainee was an al-Qaida safe house operator and admitted attending al-Qaida and Taliban affiliated guesthouses and training camps. Detainee’s family has close familial ties with senior level al-Qaida members. JTF-GTMO determined this detainee to be: • A HIGH risk, as he is likely to pose a threat to the US, its interests, and allies • A MEDIUM threat from a detention perspective • Of HIGH intelligence value c. (S//NF) Summary of Changes: The following outlines changes to detainee’s assessment since the last JTF-GTMO recommendation. (Changes in this assessment will be annotated by ¾ next to the footnote.) • Added aliases Abd al-Sattar Khan1 and Hasan Muhammad Saleh al-Dini Umayr2 • Added multiple reports indicating detainee’s knowledge of the Strait of Hormuz operation • Added reported detainee pocket litter not at JTF-GTMO 4. (U) Detainee’s Account of Events: The following section is based, unless otherwise indicated, on detainee’s own account. These statements are included without consideration of veracity, accuracy, or reliability. a. (S//NF) Prior History: Detainee attended approximately eight to nine years of school in Jeddah studying history, geography, English, and other basic courses. Detainee has nine brothers four of whom were active extremists. Hussam, aka (Mohanad), was killed in Kabul, AF while working with the Taliban in 1997. YM-10014 is detained at JTF-GTMO. Abd al- Aziz, aka (Gul Aziz), aka (Abu Barra), is detained in Yemen. Lastly, Hussayn was killed in Kandahar, AF after 11 September 2001. Detainee stated his father, Muhammad Saleh Bin Attash, was imprisoned in Saudi Arabia.3 Detainee was a Yemeni citizen because his father had Yemeni citizenship.4 b. (S//NF) Recruitment and Travel: Detainee first traveled to Afghanistan in approximately 1997 at the request of his older brother Hussam, who was in Afghanistan at 1 ¾TD-314/44444-02 2 ¾001456 07-MAY-2005 BIO 00001 3 001456 FM40 26-JUN-2004, 001456 FM40 07-JUN-2004 4 001456 FM40 29-SEP-2004 2 S E C R E T / / NOFORN / / 20330625 Downloaded from The Rendition Project www.therenditionproject.org.uk Source: the New York Times S E C R E T / / NOFORN / / 20330625 JTF-GTMO-CDR SUBJECT: Recommendation for Continued Detention Under DoD Control (CD) for Guantanamo Detainee, ISN PK9SA-001456DP (S) the time.5 Detainee stated his older brother YM-10014 also played a major role during his time in Afghanistan.6 Detainee held a Yemeni passport, so he and his brother Abd al-Aziz traveled from Saudi Arabia to Yemen, where detainee obtained a visa for Pakistan.7 While in Yemen, detainee and his brother contacted mujahideen facilitator Muhammad al-Munasar, aka (Abu Hamza al-Baidani), who called senior al-Qaida operative Zayn al-Abidin Muhammad Husayn, aka (Abu Zubaydah), ISN US9GZ-010016DP (GZ-10016), and recommended the two be accepted for participation in Afghan militant operations. They traveled to Karachi, PK where GZ-10016 and al-Dhahak al-Tabuki met and took them to al- Khattab’s Guesthouse located approximately one hour outside Peshawar, PK. Detainee and Abd al-Aziz then traveled to GZ-10016’s guesthouse in Peshawar where they met senior al- Qaida operative Ali Muhammad Abd al- Aziz al-Fakhri, aka (Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi), ISN US9LY-000212DP (LY-212). Detainee and Abd al-Aziz then traveled to Jalalabad, AF via Torkhum, AF. In Jalalabad, detainee’s older brother, Hussam, took detainee and Abd al-Aziz to Najim al-Jihad.8 Detainee stayed at Najim al-Jihad for a short period of time before his brother Hussam took him to Khaldan Training Camp in Khowst, AF via Kabul.9 c. (S//NF) Training and Activities: Detainee arrived at the Khaldan Camp prior to 30 December 1997, where he began basic training on light and heavy weapons, mortars, hand grenades, land mines, and a three to five week general overview of explosives. Detainee remained at the Khaldan Camp until approximately late May or June 1998, when Hussam returned to retrieve him.10 After detainee’s training at Khaldan, detainee returned to Kabul where he stayed for less than one month. In Kabul, detainee met his brothers YM-10014, Hussam, and Abd al-Aziz. Detainee remained in Kabul for two to three weeks recovering from malaria, when he heard Hussam was killed and YM-10014 lost a leg. Detainee and Abd al-Aziz then traveled to Jalalabad and then on to Peshawar, where they stayed at GZ- 10016’s house for two nights. GZ-10016 provided the pair with plane tickets from Islamabad, PK to Yemen. Detainee spent several days in Yemen with Abu Hamza al- Baidani’s group before continuing on to Saudi Arabia. Detainee spent approximately two to four months with his family in Jeddah before returning to Afghanistan. Detainee then traveled from Saudi Arabia to Kandahar, where he lived in a guesthouse near the airport. From Kandahar, he traveled via Kabul to the Jihad Wahl Camp in Khowst, where he and his 5 001456 FM40 29-SEP-2004 6 001456 FM40 26-JUN-2004 7 001456 FM40 29-SEP-2004 8 TD-314/48022-02, Analyst Note: Variants of Najim al-Jihad include Nejm al-Jihad and Nazim al-Jihad. The Najim al-Jihad compound is reportedly owned by UBL. The compound housed al-Qaida members and their families. 9 IIR 6 034 0180 06, 001456 FM40 29-SEP-2004 10 001456 FM40 29-SEP-2004, Analyst Note: Detainee stated he arrived at Khaldan Camp in late 1997 prior to Ramadan. Ramadan began on 30 December 1997 and ended on 28 January 1998. Detainee stated he remained at Khaldan for five or six months. 3 S E C R E T / / NOFORN / / 20330625 Downloaded from The Rendition Project www.therenditionproject.org.uk Source: the New York Times S E C R E T / / NOFORN / / 20330625 JTF-GTMO-CDR SUBJECT: Recommendation for Continued Detention Under DoD Control (CD) for Guantanamo Detainee, ISN PK9SA-001456DP (S) brother, Abd al-Aziz, attended explosives training for approximately three to five months. After this training, detainee traveled between Kabul and the front lines before enrolling at the Islamic School in Khowst. He remained at the Islamic School for less than one year, during which time he heard of the 7 August 1998 US Embassy bombings in East Africa. After leaving school, he traveled between Kandahar, Kabul, and Jalalabad. In early 1999, detainee traveled to Jalalabad, where he joined a large group of North Africans. He attended a few days of an electronics course, but quit because it was taught in English. While in Jalalabad, he attended an Algerian camp called “Daruntah,” where he took one week of explosives training. He quit Daruntah and returned to Jalalabad where he served as a “foot soldier” at a location run primarily by Algerians.11 Detainee then traveled to Kandahar, where he stayed at the airport complex belonging to UBL, who visited at least three times, and spent most of the year 2000 “just hanging out.” During this time detainee heard rumors about a “big hit.” Around the end of 2000, YM-10014 told detainee to travel to Karachi with SA-10015 because there were rumors that detainee was affiliated with Takfiris and their ideology.12 In approximately March 2001, detainee traveled to Karachi, lived with SA-10015 and spent most of his time picking up supplies. During this time, detainee was again privy to plans for an attack on US ships using ships purchased in the United Arab Emirates (AE).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unclassified//For Public Release Unclassified//For Public Release
    UNCLASSIFIED//FOR PUBLIC RELEASE --SESR-Efll-N0F0RN-­ Final Dispositions as of January 22, 2010 Guantanamo Review Dispositions Country ISN Name Decision of Origin AF 4 Abdul Haq Wasiq Continued detention pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (2001), as informed by principles of the laws of war. AF 6 Mullah Norullah Noori Continued detention pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (2001), as informed by principles of the laws of war. AF 7 Mullah Mohammed Fazl Continued detention pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (2001 ), as informed by principles of the laws of war. AF 560 Haji Wali Muhammed Continued detention pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (2001 ), as informed by principles of the laws of war, subject to further review by the Principals prior to the detainee's transfer to a detention facility in the United States. AF 579 Khairullah Said Wali Khairkhwa Continued detention pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (2001), as informed by principles of the laws of war. AF 753 Abdul Sahir Referred for prosecution. AF 762 Obaidullah Referred for prosecution. AF 782 Awai Gui Continued detention pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (2001), as informed by principles of the laws of war. AF 832 Mohammad Nabi Omari Continued detention pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (2001 ), as informed by principles of the laws of war. AF 850 Mohammed Hashim Transfer to a country outside the United States that will implement appropriate security measures. AF 899 Shawali Khan Transfer to • subject to appropriate security measures.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. October 19, 2011 To: Robert Nicholson, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada Re: Letter in Support of Private
    October 19, 2011 To: Robert Nicholson, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada Re: Letter in Support of Private Prosecutions Filed Against George W. Bush for Torture We, the undersigned human rights non-governmental organizations and individuals, are writing this statement in full support of the private prosecutions against George W. Bush, former President of the United States, being lodged on behalf of three former Guantánamo detainees, and one current detainee, who allege that they were tortured by U.S. officials, and seek a criminal investigation and prosecution against Mr. Bush upon arrival in Canada, for substantive breaches of the Canadian Criminal Code and United Nations Convention Against Torture (CAT). The criminal cases submitted under sections 504, 269.1, 21 and 22 of the Canadian Criminal Code, and the Indictment with an appendix of supporting material attached thereto, (collectively, the “Bush Dossiers”) set forth reasonable and probable grounds to believe that a person who is scheduled to be present on Canadian territory has committed an act of torture. The Case Against George W. Bush The Bush Dossiers allege that George W. Bush, in his capacity of former president of the United States, bears individual responsibility for acts of torture and/or cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment committed against detainees held in U.S. custody or rendered to other countries by the U.S., in that he ordered, authorized, condoned, planned or otherwise aided and abetted such acts, or failed to prevent or punish subordinates for the commission of such acts. As set forth in detail in the Bush Dossiers, including through documentary evidence in the form of inter alia official memoranda issued by Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • True and False Confessions: the Efficacy of Torture and Brutal
    Chapter 7 True and False Confessions The Efficacy of Torture and Brutal Interrogations Central to the debate on the use of “enhanced” interrogation techniques is the question of whether those techniques are effective in gaining intelligence. If the techniques are the only way to get actionable intelligence that prevents terrorist attacks, their use presents a moral dilemma for some. On the other hand, if brutality does not produce useful intelligence — that is, it is not better at getting information than other methods — the debate is moot. This chapter focuses on the effectiveness of the CIA’s enhanced interrogation technique program. There are far fewer people who defend brutal interrogations by the military. Most of the military’s mistreatment of captives was not authorized in detail at high levels, and some was entirely unauthorized. Many military captives were either foot soldiers or were entirely innocent, and had no valuable intelligence to reveal. Many of the perpetrators of abuse in the military were young interrogators with limited training and experience, or were not interrogators at all. The officials who authorized the CIA’s interrogation program have consistently maintained that it produced useful intelligence, led to the capture of terrorist suspects, disrupted terrorist attacks, and saved American lives. Vice President Dick Cheney, in a 2009 speech, stated that the enhanced interrogation of captives “prevented the violent death of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of innocent people.” President George W. Bush similarly stated in his memoirs that “[t]he CIA interrogation program saved lives,” and “helped break up plots to attack military and diplomatic facilities abroad, Heathrow Airport and Canary Wharf in London, and multiple targets in the United States.” John Brennan, President Obama’s recent nominee for CIA director, said, of the CIA’s program in a televised interview in 2007, “[t]here [has] been a lot of information that has come out from these interrogation procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharqawi Al Hajj Guled Hassan Duran
    No: ICC-02/17 Date: 31 January 2018 PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER III Before: Judge Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua, Presiding Judge Judge Chang-ho Chung Judge Raul C. Pangalangan SITUATION IN THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF AFGHANISTAN VICTIMS’ REPRESENTATION (Victims’ Representation Forms at Appendix I and II) -Confidential- Submitted on Behalf of: SHARQAWI AL HAJJ GULED HASSAN DURAN Submitted by and through: Katherine Gallagher Center for Constitutional Rights 666 Broadway, 7th Floor New York, NY 10012 Representative On the ICC List of Counsel. Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 II. FACTUAL AND CONTEXTUAL BACKGROUND: THE UNITED STATES DETENTION AND INTERROGATION PROGRAM IN AFGHANISTAN AND OTHER STATES PARTIES ............................................................................................................................... 6 a. U.S. Detention Operations ............................................................................................................ 8 b. CIA Detention and Interrogation .............................................................................................. 11 i. CIA “High-Value Detainee” and Direct Detention Program .................................................. 11 ii. Extraordinary Rendition and Proxy Detention ........................................................................ 18 c. Department of Defense Detention in Afghanistan and Transfer to Guantánamo ................ 22 III. ARREST,
    [Show full text]
  • Guantanamo Detainee Profile
    UNCLASSIFIED Approved for Public Release 28 MARCH 2016 GUANTANAMO DETAINEE PROFILE Detainee ISN: SA- 1456 Detainee ISN SA- 1456 Detainee Name Hasan Muhammad Salih bin Attash Detainee Aliases Umayr; Umayr al-Gharib ; Mughayrah; Hasan al - Dini Nationality Saudi or Yemeni Date of Birth 1982 Arrival at Guantanamo September2004 HasanbinAttash(SA-1456 servedas a facilitatorand explosivesspecialist for al- inthe early 2000s.He grew up immersedinviolentextremist ideology, comingfrom a family closelyassociatedwithUsamabinLadin. SA-1456was an aidto several senioral- members, helpingrunsafehouses, facilitatethe movementof fighters, and completeerrands. He also supportednumerousplotsagainstUS and other Westerntargets in Afghanistan, Pakistan, the MiddleEast NorthAfrica. He was skilledin bombmakingandcontributedto al explosivesactivities and capabilities. SA-1456'sextremist activitybeganinAfghanistanin 1997, whenhe pledgedallegianceto UsamabinLadin. He participatedin basic andadvancedmilitaryandexplosivestrainingprobablyincludingpoisonstraining briefly supportedthe frontlines, and servedas a bodyguardfor bin Ladin. In2000, he relocatedto Pakistantofacilitate logisticsand travelfor al- whichhe continueddoingintermittentlyfor abouttwo years. He also facilitated al- externaloperationsagainst US and other Westerntargets, andwas himselfselectedto participateintwo suchplannedattacks. Concurrently, in 2002, SA- 1456 built,procured, anddeliveredexplosivesfor al- in supportofanti-coalitionattacks inAfghanistan. SA- 1456was arrested inan al- safehousewithsenior
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibits Attached to Arguments on Admissibility, Declaration of Mohammed Abdullah Saleh Al-Asad, and Declaration of Zahra Ahmed Mohamed
    BEFORE THE AFRICAN COMMISSION FOR HUMAN & PEOPLES’ RIGHTS 49th ORDINARY SESSION: APRIL-MAY 2011 COMMUNICATION NO. 383/2010 In the matter between: MOHAMMED ABDULLAH SALEH AL-ASAD and DJIBOUTI EXHIBITS ATTACHED TO ARGUMENTS ON ADMISSIBILITY, DECLARATION OF MOHAMMED ABDULLAH SALEH AL-ASAD, AND DECLARATION OF ZAHRA AHMED MOHAMED EXHIBITS The United Republic of Tanzania Departure Declaration Card, 27 December 2003…….A Center for Human Rights and Global Justice, On the Record: U.S. Disclosures on Rendition, Secret Detention, and Coercive Interrogation (New York: NYU School of Law, 2008)………………………………………………………………………………..B Letter to the Attorney General of Djibouti, 31 March 2009…….….…..…….…….….…C United Nations Human Rights Council, 13th Session, Joint Study on Global Practices in Relation to Secret Detention in the Context of Countering Terrorism, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/13/42 (19 February 2010)………………………………………………………. D Republic v. Director of Immigration Services, ex parte Mohammed al-Asad (Habeas Corpus petition), High Court of Tanzania, 17 June 2004………………………………...E Amnesty International, United States of America: Below the radar- Secret flights to torture and ‘disappearance,’ 5 April 2006……………………………………………….F Prepared Remarks of Treasury Secretary John Snow to Announce Joint U.S. and Saudi Action Against Four Branches of Al-Haramain in the Financial War on Terror, JS-1107, 22 January 2004…………………………………………………………………………..G Henry Lyimo, Guardian (Dar es Salaam), Yemenis, Italians Expelled, 30 December 2003…………………………………………………………………………………...….H Roderick Ndomba, Daily News (Dar es Salaam), Dar Deports 2,367 Aliens, 30 December 2003……...……………………………..………………………………………………….I International Committee of the Red Cross, ICRC Report on the Treatment of Fourteen “High Value Detainees” in CIA Custody, 2007…………………………..……….……...J International Seismological Centre Earthquake Data…………………………………….K U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee Study Ofthe Central Intelligence Agency's Detention And
    TOP SECRE' Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Committee Study ofthe CentralIntelligence Agency's Detention and Interrogation Program Minority Views Additional Minority Views TOP SECRE': JQFQRN UNCLASSIFIED TOP Senate Select Committee on Intelligence MINORITY VIEWS OF ViCECHAIRMAN CHAMBUSS JOINEDBY SenatorsBurr, Risch, Coats, Rvbio, and Coburn' June 20, 2014 [[Revisedfor Redaction on December 5, 2014]f "When these minority views were initially written in response to the original Study approved by the United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence on December 13, 2012, the following members ofthe Committee signed on to them: Vice Chairman Chambliss joined bySenators Burr, Risch, Coats, Blunt, andRubio. ^[[Please note that the double-bracketed text in Ais document is new explanatory text necessitated by substantive modifications to die Study's Executive Summary and Findings and Conclusions that were made after omJune 20, 2014, Minority Views were submitted to the Central Intelligence Agency for the declassification review. We also' note that these Minority Views are in response to, and atpoints predicated upon, the reseaich and foundational work that underlie the Study's account of the CIA Detention and Interrogation Program. These Views should not be treated as an independent report based upon aseparate investigation, but rather our evaluation and critique ofthe Study's problematic analysis, factual findings, and conclusions.]] TOP SECRET// //NQFQRN UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED TOP TABLE OF CONTENTS (U) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I (U)
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to The
    October 5, 2020 The Honorable Gina Haspel Director, Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D.C. 20505 Dear Director Haspel: I am writing to request information relating to activities under the CIA’s Rendition, Detention, and Interrogation (RDI) program that were conducted in North Carolina and relied upon the private citizens and public infrastructure of North Carolina. This information is essential to help my constituents and the broader public understand key elements of the RDI program that have not been examined in previous reports or investigations. From 2016 to 2018, an important citizen-led inquiry was conducted into these activities by the non-governmental, non-partisan North Carolina Commission of Inquiry on Torture (NCCIT). This commission conducted a thorough investigation of the role of the state of North Carolina, its citizens, and its infrastructure in the RDI program, but lacked access to federal government records or classified information. In September 2018, the NCCIT published its report, Torture Flights: North Carolina’s Role in the CIA Rendition and Torture Program. Torture Flights concludes that RDI inflicted illegal and immoral secret detention and torture on dozens of individuals without regard for guilt or innocence; that it damaged the global standing of the U.S. and harmed our strategic relationships; that the program relied heavily on North Carolina’s private citizens and its public infrastructure; and that renditions were not simply transportation, but rather themselves constituted cruel and often torturous treatment. Torture Flights recommends numerous specific actions by local, state, and federal authorities to enhance transparency and promote accountability for the RDI program; to provide acknowledgement, redress, and reparations; and to prevent such wrongful acts from ever occurring again.
    [Show full text]
  • Rendition and the “Black Sites”
    Chapter 5 Rendition and the “Black Sites” Between 2001 and 2006, the skies over Europe, Asia, Africa and the Middle East were crisscrossed by hundreds of flights whose exact purpose was a closely held secret. Sometimes the planes were able to use airports near major capitals, while on other occasions the mission required the pilots to land at out-of-the-way airstrips. The planes were being used by the CIA to shuttle human cargo across the continents, and the shadowy air traffic was the operational side of the U.S. government’s anti-terrorist program that came to be known as “extraordinary rendition.” After the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the Bush administration resolved to use every available means to protect the United States from further attack. The extraordinary rendition program, used previously by President Bill Clinton, quickly became an important tool in that effort. In the years since, numerous investigations and inquiries have found evidence of illegal acts in the form of arbitrary detention and abuse resulting from the program. These, in turn, have led to strained relations between the United States and several friendly countries that assisted the CIA with the program. The program was conceived and operated on the assumption that it would remain secret. But that proved a vain expectation which should have been apparent to the government officials who conceived and ran it. It involved hundreds of operatives and the cooperation of many foreign governments and their officials, a poor formula for something intended to remain out of public view forever. Moreover, the prisoners transported to secret prisons for interrogations known as “black sites” would someday emerge.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Society Justice Initiative | Globalizing Torture
    GLOBALIZING TORTURE CIA SECRET DETENTION AND EXTRAORDINARY RENDITION ENDNOTES GLOBALIZING TORTURE CIA SECRET DETENTION AND EXTRAORDINARY RENDITION 2 Copyright © 2013 Open Society Foundations. This publication is available as a pdf on the Open Society Foundations website under a Creative Commons license that allows copying and distributing the publication, only in its entirety, as long as it is attributed to the Open Society Foundations and used for noncommercial educational or public policy purposes. Photographs may not be used separately from the publication. ISBN: 978-1-936133-75-8 PUBLISHED BY: Open Society Foundations 400 West 59th Street New York, New York 10019 USA www.opensocietyfoundations.org FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Amrit Singh Senior Legal Officer National Security and Counterterrorism [email protected] DESIGN AND LAYOUT BY: Ahlgrim Design Group PRINTED BY: GHP Media, Inc. PHOTOGRAPHY: Cover photo © Ron Haviv/VII 3 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND METHODOLOGY 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 RECOMMENDATIONS 9 SECTION I: INTRODUCTION 11 SECTION II: THE EVOLUTION OF CIA SECRET DETENTION AND 13 EXTRAORDINARY RENDITION OPERATIONS Extraordinary Rendition 13 Secret Detention and “Enhanced Interrogation Techniques” 15 Current Policies and Practices 19 SECTION III: INTERNATIONAL LEGAL STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO 22 CIA SECRET DETENTION AND EXTRAORDINARY RENDITION Torture and Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Treatment 23 Transfer to Torture or Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment 25 Arbitrary Detention and Enforced Disappearance 26 Participation in Secret Detention and Extraordinary Rendition Operations 27 SECTION IV: DETAINEES SUBJECTED TO POST-SEPTEMBER 11, 2001, 29 CIA SECRET DETENTION AND EXTRAORDINARY RENDITION SECTION V: FOREIGN GOVERNMENT PARTICIPATION IN 61 CIA SECRET DETENTION AND EXTRAORDINARY RENDITION SECTION VI: CONCLUSION 119 ENDNOTES 120 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report was written by Amrit Singh, Senior Legal Officer for the Open Society Justice Initiative’s National Security and Counterterrorism program, and edited by David Berry.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharqawi Abdu Ali Al Hajj, Civil Action No 09-745 (RCL), June 8, 2011
    Sharqawi Ali al-Hajj ISN 1457 Citizenship: Yemen Detained Since: February 2002 Sharqawi Ali al-Hajj Sharqawi Ali al-Hajj, born in 1974, is a Yemeni, who was seized in a house raid in Karachi, Pakistan in Feb- ruary 2002. Initially questioned by American interrogators, he freely answered questions about his business in Pakistan, explaining that he was doing what he could to help Yemeni refugees. He was promised that, if he continued to answer questions, he could go home to Yemen. However, his transfer to Jordan came about because, as his attorney, John A. Chandler, explained, “The CIA lied about his going home; it decided to torture Sharqawi in the hope that they might get more information from him.” Sharqawi then became one of at least 15 prisoners whose torture was outsourced to the Jordanian authori- ties between 2001 and 2004. Prior to his rendition, his Pakistani guards told him, “May your mother pray for you,” and other such exhortations, knowing that he was on his way to the Jordanian secret police. In Jordan, he was held for over almost two years. In Jordan, Sharqawi was again told that, if he cooperated, he could go home. The cooperation, it soon be- came apparent, involved obtaining information from him about prisoners held in Guantánamo, but there was no way he could please his captors, and no way that he was going home. As John Chandler also explained, “Sharqawi was shown pictures of men who he later met in Guantánamo. He was asked a series of questions from Americans posed by his Jordanian captors.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Involvement in Extraordinary Rendition
    Reprieve PO Box 52742 London EC4P 4WS Tel: 020 7353 4640 Fax: 020 7353 4641 Email: [email protected] Website: www.reprieve.org.uk SCOTTISH INVOLVEMENT IN EXTRAORDINARY RENDITION CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary 3-5 2 Colluding in Kidnapping 6-10 3 Servicing Black sites in New Europe 11-16 4 Aiding and abetting torture in 17-21 Jordan and Egypt 5 Aiding and abetting torture in 22-24 Uzbekistan 6 Appendices 25-36 2 1 Executive Summary Reprieve welcomes the Scottish parliament’s decision to fully investigate the alleged use of Scottish airports to support the CIA’s illegal programme of enforced disappearance, illegal transfer and torture of prisoners in the ‘war on terror.’1 Transfers to torture deprive the individual of their most basic human rights and subject them to the cruellest abuse. Many victims of rendition have simply disappeared, as documented by a recent report (‘Off the Record’) by Reprieve and five other major human rights groups.2 Scotland’s role in the global renditions network amounts to collusion in forcible transfer to torture. Serious questions must be asked as to how this was allowed to happen in Scotland’s name, and steps taken to ensure that it never happens again. Reprieve has compiled evidence showing that Glasgow Prestwick Airport functioned as a crucial ‘staging point’ in renditions’ circuits 3 where planes stopped to refuel en route to and from the United States and the various nations hosting secret prisons, and handing suspects to the CIA. These rendition missions simply could not have taken place had these planes not been granted refuelling rights in cooperating territories such as Scotland.
    [Show full text]