The Heberden Oration, 1961

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Heberden Oration, 1961 Ann Rheum Dis: first published as 10.1136/ard.21.1.1 on 1 March 1962. Downloaded from Ann. rheum. Dis. (1962), 21, 1. THE HEBERDEN ORATION, 1961 WILLIAM ILEBERDEN 6ultimus Romanorum: medics vere Hippocraticus' BY THE RT. HON. THE LORD COHEN OF BIRKENHEAD, P.R.S.H., M.D., D.Sc., LL.D., F.R.C.P., F.S.A. Past-President of the Heberden Society I am deeply grateful for the enviable privilege and honour of delivering the Heberden Oration. I have chosen to speak of William Heberden, Senior, from whom we as a society derive our name, because it seems to me appropriate that in the saga of our Orations one at least should be devoted to an assessment of Heberden's work. My sub-titles are derived from two contemporary copyright. assessments. Heberden attended Samuel Johnson in his final illness in 1783-4. Of this Boswell wrote: Dr. Johnson being asked in his last illness what physician he had sent for, "Dr. Heberden", replied he, "ultimus romanorutm, the last of our learned physicians". Soemmerring, in his preface to the German edition of the "Commentaries", published in http://ard.bmj.com/ Frankfurt in 1804, named Heberden medics vere Hippocraticus-a sentiment echoed by Austin Dobson, who in his "Last Essays" (1921) included one on Heberden entitled "The 18th Century Hippocrates". Sir William Osler described Heberden as "the English Celsus"-a tribute not simply to his medical, on September 28, 2021 by guest. Protected but also to his classical scholarship. The earlier editions of the "Encyclopaedia Britannica" gave him a brief notice, but he disappeared after the 1Ith edition in 1910. Yet I share the view that he is William Heberden, Senior, from W. Ward's engraving of Sir William among the outstanding clinical observers of the Beechey's portrait, now in the Royal College of Physicians of London. 18th century, and I propose, therefore, to use the biographical details as are known, so that the briefest opportunity which this lecture provides to justify sketch of his life will here suffice. this view. He was born in London in 1710. His elder I shall be concerned primarily with his clinical brother by 7 years, Thomas, was also a doctor and contributions. Many of the publications cited in a Fellow of the Royal Society. the bibliography-especially Payne's notice in the William entered St. Saviour's School, Southwark, "Dictionary of National Biography" (1891), A. C. on July 17, 1717, at the age of 7, and in the same year Buller's "Life" (1879), and the papers by Percy his father, of whom little is known, died. His Davidson (1922) and Sir Humphrey Rolleston (1933) mother recognizing his ability, sent him to Cam- in The Annals of Medical History-document such bridge, where he entered St. John's College in 1724, Ann Rheum Dis: first published as 10.1136/ard.21.1.1 on 1 March 1962. Downloaded from 2 ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES and was granted his Bachelor's degree in Arts in In London his reputation as a clinician rapidly 1728. He had acquired a wide classical learning, increased, although in his early years he went to and was well versed in Hebrew. Two years later, practise at Scarborough during the summer months. he was elected to a Fellowship of his College, and In 1752, he married the daughter of John Martin, then he pursued medical studies both at Cambridge a prominent citizen and member of Parliament, and London, receiving his Doctor's degree in but his wife died 2 years later, leaving him two sons, Medicine in 1739. one of whom, Thomas, was the father of a well- He remained at Cambridge for 9 years, actively known physician, Thomas Heberden. He married engaging in medical practice and teaching. He again in 1760 the daughter of William Wollaston. delivered annually a course of lectures on materia One of the eight children of this marriage was medica, a manuscript of which still exists. Pettigrew William Heberden, Junior, who prepared the gave extracts from these lectures in the Memoir of "Commentaries" for publication. He was able, and Heberden in his "Medical Portrait Gallery" (1840). became, in 1793, physician to St. George's Hospital, In these, classical allusions abound, but his classical unlike his father who had held no hospital appoint- learning is best exemplified by his contribution in ment, and again unlike his father, he accepted 1743 to a collected work by members of a literary several Royal appointments, including that of circle in Cambridge, the brief title of which is "The physician-in-ordinary to George III. Athenian Letters". To this work Heberden con- It is recorded that when George III invited tributed "A Letter from Cleander to Alexias on Heberden, Senior, to become physician to Queen Hippocrates and the State of Physic in Greece". Charlotte, he declined on the grounds that he was This increased his already high reputation for Greek apprehensive lest "it might interfere with those scholarship. connections of life which he had now formed". In 1745, he wrote "Antitheriaca: an Essay on In 1782, when he was 73 years old, he retired from Mithridatium and Theriaca". In this brief essay active practice. Thirty years earlier, he had been he pointed out that the ancients knew of three called in consultation with Dr. Richard Mead to see copyright. poisons only, namely hemlock, aconite, and those of the Duke of Leeds; at that time Mead was failing venomous animals. He asserted that the antidote and Heberden resolved to retire while still in com- alleged to have been used by Mithridates Eupator plete possession of his faculties. He wrote, in his the Great (133-63 B.C.) could have had no antidotal 85th year, 12 years after he had retired, that he had properties. It was, indeed, a simple remedy of not withdrawn from practice because of a wish to be rue, salt, and dried figs, though its composition had idle, but because he wished to give over "before varied throughout the ages. Despite Heberden's my presence of thought, judgement and recollection http://ard.bmj.com/ cogent diatribe against this 'farrago', as he called it, was so impaired, that I could not do justice to my the antidote remained in the Pharmacopoeia of the patients. It is more desirable for a man to do this Royal College of Physicians of London for another a little too soon than a little too late, for the chief half century. danger is on the side of not doing it soon enough". He was elected a Fellow of the Royal College of Heberden's other distinctions, listed in full in the Physicians in 1746, where in 1749 he delivered the memoirs by his son as an introduction to the Goulstonian Lectures, in 1750 the Harveian Oration, "Commentaries", by Pettigrew, Buller, Munk, and and in 1760 the Croonian Lectures. It was not more recent memoirs, included the Fellowship of on September 28, 2021 by guest. Protected until 1748 that he settled in London, whither he was the Society of Antiquaries to which he was elected invited by Sir Edward Hulse, physician to King in 1770. George III, and later learnt that an earlier invitation He died at the age of 92 at his residence in Pall had gone astray. Mall; he was then senior Fellow of the College of In 1749, he was elected a Fellow of the Royal Physicians. He lies buried in the parish church of Society. In 1745 he had contributed to its Philo- Windsor. There, on a monument erected to his sophical Transactions a report on a large urinary memory, are inscribed words from which none of his calculus, which had been exhibited in the library of contemporaries would have demurred: "He practised Trinity College, Cambridge, for 80 years, but it is physic, first at Cambridge, afterwards in London, there no longer. In 1765, he described a second large with great and unsullied reputation above 50 years. urinary calculus which was 31 inches long and His distinguished learning, his sweetness of manners 4j inches in circumference in a woman, which was and active benevolence, raised him to an uncommon voided without help. His other contributions in height in public esteem". the Philosophical Transactions dealt with meteoro- I have already quoted Boswell's words, but his logical topics. popularity and success are well illustrated in the Ann Rheum Dis: first published as 10.1136/ard.21.1.1 on 1 March 1962. Downloaded from HEBERDEN ORATION 3 following verse common in the 18th century, which that "my desire is that mine adversary had written concerned the three most prominent physicians then a book", for Heberden was later to write, "If men of in London: letters could be obliged to write always with a view You should send, if aught should ail ye, to publishing, though without ever doing so, they For Willis, Heberden, or Baillie: would be perhaps the happiest of men." All exceeding skilful men, In his preface to the "Commentaries" Heberden Baillie, Willis, Heberden; wrote, "Plutarch says that the life of the vestal Uncertain which most sure to kill is virgin was divided into three portions: in the first Baillie, Heberden, or Willis. she learned the duties of her profession; in the second she practised them; and in the third she Heberden numbered amongst his friends and taught them to others. This is no bad model for patients many poets and writers. Samuel Richard- the life of a physician." He went on to say that son, the novelist, left a ring to "the kind Dr.
Recommended publications
  • William Stukeley and the Gout
    Medical History, 1992, 36: 160-186. WILLIAM STUKELEY AND THE GOUT by KEVIN J. FRASER * Gout was an ubiquitous disease in Georgian England. Although its victims were often immobilized at home for weeks on end, it was not, however, entirely unwelcome. Predominately a male disease, because of its frequency in the corridors of power and association with extravagant lifestyles, it was perceived as socially desirable. Moreover, there was the belief that the gouty were protected from more life- threatening disorders such as palsy, dropsy or apoplexy. Physicians were therefore often reluctant to treat attacks ofacute gout. Such therapeutic nihilism was convenient as gout had been considered the opprobrium medicorum since ancient times and many were prepared to suffer their attacks obediently. Others continued to search for a cure, looking beyond a disturbance of the four bodily humours for the cause of the disease. Pamphleteers fed the huge public appetite for such information, and the diaries and letters ofthe period contain frequent references to gout. However, these accounts often leave some uncertainty about the diagnosis, as most other forms ofarthritis were yet to be distinguished from gout. William Stukeley's descriptions of his own gout are, therefore, of particular importance, for they leave no doubt about the diagnosis.' Not only do they provide * Kevin J. Fraser, MBBS, MRCP(UK), FRACP, Medical History Unit and Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3052, Australia. Mailing Address: Austin Private Consulting Suite, 226 Burgundy Street, Heidelberg 3084, Victoria, Australia. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was made possible by the generous assistance of Mrs Elizabeth White (Texas Medical Center Library), Mr Geoffrey Davenport (Royal College of Physicians), Mr Steven Tomlinson (Bodleian Library), and Mr Alan Clark and Ms Sandra Cumming (Royal Society), Mr Norman Leveritt (Spalding Gentleman's Society) Mr Nicholas Muellner (Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Yale University) and Dr Mark Nicholls (Cambridge University Library).
    [Show full text]
  • The Eagle 1880 (Easter)
    Bacltelm's of A"fs (con/i""erl) : VOL. XI. I 'V. No. LXII. MAY; Warleigh, Rev. F. L. Wilkins, E. 'v. Wilson, Rev. A. R. 'Vnod, 1880. Warren, W. Willan, 'V. .T. 'Vilson, W. )1. O. I 'Voouho use, R. 1. 'Yedmore, E. Willcox, Rev. F. Winch, R. F. 'Voolley, A. D. Welsby, C. Williams, Rev. I-LA. 'Vinstnnley, J. A. 'Vorkman , Rev A. 'Yhytehead, Rev. Williams,Rev. ·W.G. Wise, J, S. Wright, Rcv. F. P. R.Y. WilJiamson, C. C. 'Wood, Ho M. Wyles, Ru\,. W. Widgery, W. Wills, W. Wood, C. H. I Wilkes, J. THE EAGLE. Undel'!/mduates : Abraham, W. Du Bose, J. F. Hawkins, A. Peek, A. M. AlIin, W. J. Duncan, W. H. Henson, J. R. Phm, J. H. *Apperly, J. Marl ing Dunn, H. E. Hickman, H. Prance, \V. H. Fawkes,Lieut.W. Ho r t, Sandys, J. :-:. Bansall, W. H. lc ol' E. A MAGAZINE SUPPORTED BY MEMBERS OF Bayard, R. V. C. Ford, E. J. Ireland, A. Sellon, A. G. Bevan, J. A. Frewen, E. Jalland. A. E. Steel', W. H. H. Boyd, J. Gatty, F. A. Jones, E. D. 'V. Thomas. Rev. W. )I. ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE. llrown, A. M. George, J. H. Laing, P. If. Turner, T. A. Uarter, J. 1'. tGibson-Carmichael, Lee, F. B. N. Whitehead, J. B. Cassels, VV. 'V. T. D. Lister, J. J. \Vickcns, II. J. Colson, F. H. Greenaway, W. Livett, G. M. Wilkinson, G. G. Coppock, T. Gwatkin, J. R.G. Manisty, G. E. Williams, A. Davison, R. E. Ha'gh, A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Two Heberdens (Part II, Conclusion)
    THE TWO HEBERDENS WILLIAM HEBERDEN THE ELDER (1710-1801) WILLIAM HEBERDEN THE YOUNGER (1767-1845) By SIR HUMPHRY ROLLESTON, BART., G.C.V.O., K.C.B., M.D. HASLEMERE, SURREY, ENGLAND (Conc lus ion ) * (14) “A letter to Dr. Heberden con- Life of Jenner, did not reach Heberden cerning the Angina Pectoris; and Dr. who certainly never referred to the sub- Heberden’s Account of the Dissection of ject. Jenner did not publish the coronary one who had been troubled with the origin, out of consideration for Hunter disorder” (3: 1-11, 1785). Read at a who, however, was probably fully aware meeting on November 17, 1772. The of the association of coronary disease and letter dated April 16, 1772, was signed angina, and of the true nature of his own by “Unknown” who, having seen in the symptoms. For in 1776 Fothergill pub- Critical Review an abstract of Heberden’s lished a fatal case in which Hunter in paper (read in 1768 and published in 1775 had found that “the two coronary 1772), recognized his own symptoms and arteries from their origin to many of their described them in a way which the late ramifications in the heart were become Sir William Osler regarded as one of the one piece of bone.” Jenner sent his friend best on record. Realizing that he might Caleb Hillier Parry (1755-1822) a full die suddenly “the unknown” left direc- written statement of his opinion that tions that Heberden, who by this time coronary disease was the cause of angina, had seen 50 cases, should then examine pointing out that he did not wish to make his body.
    [Show full text]
  • William Hvde Wollaston J the PRODUCTION of MALLEABLE PLATINUM by Donald Mcdonald Johnson Matthey & Co Limited
    William Hvde Wollaston J THE PRODUCTION OF MALLEABLE PLATINUM By Donald McDonald Johnson Matthey & Co Limited The occurrence of the bicentenary of true facts brought to light, by the long and Wollaston’s birth affords an opportunity to painstaking work of the late Mr L. F. Gilbert, review in these pages the important scientific who devoted many years to a study of the and technical work that he did in the field subject but unfortunately died before he of the platinum group of metals. The physical could collate and publish the results in full. and chemical details of that work are of He was, from 1919 to 1955, a lecturer in course well known from his published papers chemistry at University College, London, and to the Royal Society, including the Bakerian his papers are in the custody of its Library, Lecture of 1828 which he prepared just before but have not so far found an editor to prepare his death. But, until recent years, little was them for the publication for which those known about the circumstances in which he interested have hoped. He did, however, in undertook and carried on the work and a 1952 publish a short paper on Wollaston’s number of legends have grown up about it. work on platinum in The Notes and Records These have latterly been dispersed, and the of the Royal Society which, together with a William Hyde Wollaston 1766-1829 Born 200 years ago, Wollaston loas the jirst to refine native platinum on a logical and scientijic basis and to develop its industrial use.
    [Show full text]
  • Learned Organizations
    Max Planck Research Library for the History and Development of Knowledge Studies 7 Christa Jungnickel and Russell McCormmach: Learned Organizations In: Christa Jungnickel and Russell McCormmach: Cavendish : The Experimental Life (Sec- ond revised edition 2016) Online version at http://edition-open-access.de/studies/7/ ISBN 978-3-945561-06-5 First published 2016 by Edition Open Access, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 3.0 Germany Licence. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/de/ Printed and distributed by: PRO BUSINESS digital printing Deutschland GmbH, Berlin http://www.book-on-demand.de/shop/14971 The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de Chapter 10 Learned Organizations Royal Society At the time Cavendish entered the Royal Society, its membership was stable, as it had not been before and would not be after. During the twenty years centering on 1760, the average number of ordinary members was practically constant, around 350, whereas it had grown by nearly one quarter in the thirty years after Cavendish’s father had joined. The foreign membership was now at its maximum, around 160, forty percent larger than it had been thirty years before; thereafter it slowly declined owing to a deliberate policy of the Society to stop the escalation of the honorary segment of its membership.1 Beginning in 1753, candidates for membership had to be known “personally” to their recommenders. Throughout his fifty years in the Society, Cavendish recommended a new member every year or two, somewhat over thirty all told.
    [Show full text]
  • The List of the Royal Society. MDCCLXXI-MDCCLXXVI
    =??ir-v k-Zoosj c mu- soc'e''v V* v. ft . ■ . ■ . T H E LIST O F THE ROYAL SOCIETY. MDCCLXXI. His Sacred Majefty King GEORGE III. Patron. His Sacr. Majefty STANISLAUS AUGUSTUS* King of Poland. His Sacr. Majefty CHRISTIAN King of Denmark. His moft Serene Highnefs CHARLES Margrave of Baden Dourlach. His moft Serene Highnefs FRANCIS Duke of Modena. His moft Serene Highnefs CHARLES WILLIAM FERDINAND. Hereditary Prince of Brunswick. ' THE PRESENT COUNCIL. James West, Efq; Prefident, Hugh Earl of Marchmont. Mufei Britannici Curator. Nevil Mafkelyne, B. D. A/lron. Reg. Hon. Daines Barrington, V. P. Matthew Maty, M. D. Sec. Acadd. Mr. John Belchier. Reg. Berol. & Suec. & Soc.Holl. S. John Blair, LL. D. Charles Morton, M. D. Sec. Ac add. James Burrow, Efq; V. P. Impp. Nat. Cur. & Petr op. Soc. John Campbell, Efq; Edward Delaval, Efq; Charles Moss, Lord Bifhop of Samuel Dyer, Efq; Saint David’s. Matthew Duane,Efq; Muf.Brit. Cur. Henry Owen, M. D. Thomas Hollis, Efq; Sir James Porter, Knt. William Hunter, M. D. Matthew Raper, Efq; Thomas Earl of Macclesfield. Samuel Wegg, Efq; Treaf. V. P, This COUNCIL is. to be continued till Saint Andrew’s Day, 1771. 9 2 HOME MEMBERS. Robert Adam, Efq; Charles Lord Cadogan, M\ Swithin Adee, M. D. Brit. Cur. Nathan Alcock, M. D. Sir James Caldwall, Bart. Thomas Aiiguifti, Efq; Charles Lord Camden. John Arbuthnot, Efq; Shuckburgh Afhby, Efq; John Canton, A. M. Anthony Alkew, M. D. Peter Canvane, M. D. Thomas AiHe, Efq; Lord Ch.Cavendish, M. Br. Cur. Sir Jofeph Ayloffe, Bart.
    [Show full text]