The Heberden Oration, 1961
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
William Stukeley and the Gout
Medical History, 1992, 36: 160-186. WILLIAM STUKELEY AND THE GOUT by KEVIN J. FRASER * Gout was an ubiquitous disease in Georgian England. Although its victims were often immobilized at home for weeks on end, it was not, however, entirely unwelcome. Predominately a male disease, because of its frequency in the corridors of power and association with extravagant lifestyles, it was perceived as socially desirable. Moreover, there was the belief that the gouty were protected from more life- threatening disorders such as palsy, dropsy or apoplexy. Physicians were therefore often reluctant to treat attacks ofacute gout. Such therapeutic nihilism was convenient as gout had been considered the opprobrium medicorum since ancient times and many were prepared to suffer their attacks obediently. Others continued to search for a cure, looking beyond a disturbance of the four bodily humours for the cause of the disease. Pamphleteers fed the huge public appetite for such information, and the diaries and letters ofthe period contain frequent references to gout. However, these accounts often leave some uncertainty about the diagnosis, as most other forms ofarthritis were yet to be distinguished from gout. William Stukeley's descriptions of his own gout are, therefore, of particular importance, for they leave no doubt about the diagnosis.' Not only do they provide * Kevin J. Fraser, MBBS, MRCP(UK), FRACP, Medical History Unit and Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3052, Australia. Mailing Address: Austin Private Consulting Suite, 226 Burgundy Street, Heidelberg 3084, Victoria, Australia. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was made possible by the generous assistance of Mrs Elizabeth White (Texas Medical Center Library), Mr Geoffrey Davenport (Royal College of Physicians), Mr Steven Tomlinson (Bodleian Library), and Mr Alan Clark and Ms Sandra Cumming (Royal Society), Mr Norman Leveritt (Spalding Gentleman's Society) Mr Nicholas Muellner (Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Yale University) and Dr Mark Nicholls (Cambridge University Library). -
The Eagle 1880 (Easter)
Bacltelm's of A"fs (con/i""erl) : VOL. XI. I 'V. No. LXII. MAY; Warleigh, Rev. F. L. Wilkins, E. 'v. Wilson, Rev. A. R. 'Vnod, 1880. Warren, W. Willan, 'V. .T. 'Vilson, W. )1. O. I 'Voouho use, R. 1. 'Yedmore, E. Willcox, Rev. F. Winch, R. F. 'Voolley, A. D. Welsby, C. Williams, Rev. I-LA. 'Vinstnnley, J. A. 'Vorkman , Rev A. 'Yhytehead, Rev. Williams,Rev. ·W.G. Wise, J, S. Wright, Rcv. F. P. R.Y. WilJiamson, C. C. 'Wood, Ho M. Wyles, Ru\,. W. Widgery, W. Wills, W. Wood, C. H. I Wilkes, J. THE EAGLE. Undel'!/mduates : Abraham, W. Du Bose, J. F. Hawkins, A. Peek, A. M. AlIin, W. J. Duncan, W. H. Henson, J. R. Phm, J. H. *Apperly, J. Marl ing Dunn, H. E. Hickman, H. Prance, \V. H. Fawkes,Lieut.W. Ho r t, Sandys, J. :-:. Bansall, W. H. lc ol' E. A MAGAZINE SUPPORTED BY MEMBERS OF Bayard, R. V. C. Ford, E. J. Ireland, A. Sellon, A. G. Bevan, J. A. Frewen, E. Jalland. A. E. Steel', W. H. H. Boyd, J. Gatty, F. A. Jones, E. D. 'V. Thomas. Rev. W. )I. ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE. llrown, A. M. George, J. H. Laing, P. If. Turner, T. A. Uarter, J. 1'. tGibson-Carmichael, Lee, F. B. N. Whitehead, J. B. Cassels, VV. 'V. T. D. Lister, J. J. \Vickcns, II. J. Colson, F. H. Greenaway, W. Livett, G. M. Wilkinson, G. G. Coppock, T. Gwatkin, J. R.G. Manisty, G. E. Williams, A. Davison, R. E. Ha'gh, A. -
The Two Heberdens (Part II, Conclusion)
THE TWO HEBERDENS WILLIAM HEBERDEN THE ELDER (1710-1801) WILLIAM HEBERDEN THE YOUNGER (1767-1845) By SIR HUMPHRY ROLLESTON, BART., G.C.V.O., K.C.B., M.D. HASLEMERE, SURREY, ENGLAND (Conc lus ion ) * (14) “A letter to Dr. Heberden con- Life of Jenner, did not reach Heberden cerning the Angina Pectoris; and Dr. who certainly never referred to the sub- Heberden’s Account of the Dissection of ject. Jenner did not publish the coronary one who had been troubled with the origin, out of consideration for Hunter disorder” (3: 1-11, 1785). Read at a who, however, was probably fully aware meeting on November 17, 1772. The of the association of coronary disease and letter dated April 16, 1772, was signed angina, and of the true nature of his own by “Unknown” who, having seen in the symptoms. For in 1776 Fothergill pub- Critical Review an abstract of Heberden’s lished a fatal case in which Hunter in paper (read in 1768 and published in 1775 had found that “the two coronary 1772), recognized his own symptoms and arteries from their origin to many of their described them in a way which the late ramifications in the heart were become Sir William Osler regarded as one of the one piece of bone.” Jenner sent his friend best on record. Realizing that he might Caleb Hillier Parry (1755-1822) a full die suddenly “the unknown” left direc- written statement of his opinion that tions that Heberden, who by this time coronary disease was the cause of angina, had seen 50 cases, should then examine pointing out that he did not wish to make his body. -
William Hvde Wollaston J the PRODUCTION of MALLEABLE PLATINUM by Donald Mcdonald Johnson Matthey & Co Limited
William Hvde Wollaston J THE PRODUCTION OF MALLEABLE PLATINUM By Donald McDonald Johnson Matthey & Co Limited The occurrence of the bicentenary of true facts brought to light, by the long and Wollaston’s birth affords an opportunity to painstaking work of the late Mr L. F. Gilbert, review in these pages the important scientific who devoted many years to a study of the and technical work that he did in the field subject but unfortunately died before he of the platinum group of metals. The physical could collate and publish the results in full. and chemical details of that work are of He was, from 1919 to 1955, a lecturer in course well known from his published papers chemistry at University College, London, and to the Royal Society, including the Bakerian his papers are in the custody of its Library, Lecture of 1828 which he prepared just before but have not so far found an editor to prepare his death. But, until recent years, little was them for the publication for which those known about the circumstances in which he interested have hoped. He did, however, in undertook and carried on the work and a 1952 publish a short paper on Wollaston’s number of legends have grown up about it. work on platinum in The Notes and Records These have latterly been dispersed, and the of the Royal Society which, together with a William Hyde Wollaston 1766-1829 Born 200 years ago, Wollaston loas the jirst to refine native platinum on a logical and scientijic basis and to develop its industrial use. -
Learned Organizations
Max Planck Research Library for the History and Development of Knowledge Studies 7 Christa Jungnickel and Russell McCormmach: Learned Organizations In: Christa Jungnickel and Russell McCormmach: Cavendish : The Experimental Life (Sec- ond revised edition 2016) Online version at http://edition-open-access.de/studies/7/ ISBN 978-3-945561-06-5 First published 2016 by Edition Open Access, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 3.0 Germany Licence. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/de/ Printed and distributed by: PRO BUSINESS digital printing Deutschland GmbH, Berlin http://www.book-on-demand.de/shop/14971 The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de Chapter 10 Learned Organizations Royal Society At the time Cavendish entered the Royal Society, its membership was stable, as it had not been before and would not be after. During the twenty years centering on 1760, the average number of ordinary members was practically constant, around 350, whereas it had grown by nearly one quarter in the thirty years after Cavendish’s father had joined. The foreign membership was now at its maximum, around 160, forty percent larger than it had been thirty years before; thereafter it slowly declined owing to a deliberate policy of the Society to stop the escalation of the honorary segment of its membership.1 Beginning in 1753, candidates for membership had to be known “personally” to their recommenders. Throughout his fifty years in the Society, Cavendish recommended a new member every year or two, somewhat over thirty all told. -
The List of the Royal Society. MDCCLXXI-MDCCLXXVI
=??ir-v k-Zoosj c mu- soc'e''v V* v. ft . ■ . ■ . T H E LIST O F THE ROYAL SOCIETY. MDCCLXXI. His Sacred Majefty King GEORGE III. Patron. His Sacr. Majefty STANISLAUS AUGUSTUS* King of Poland. His Sacr. Majefty CHRISTIAN King of Denmark. His moft Serene Highnefs CHARLES Margrave of Baden Dourlach. His moft Serene Highnefs FRANCIS Duke of Modena. His moft Serene Highnefs CHARLES WILLIAM FERDINAND. Hereditary Prince of Brunswick. ' THE PRESENT COUNCIL. James West, Efq; Prefident, Hugh Earl of Marchmont. Mufei Britannici Curator. Nevil Mafkelyne, B. D. A/lron. Reg. Hon. Daines Barrington, V. P. Matthew Maty, M. D. Sec. Acadd. Mr. John Belchier. Reg. Berol. & Suec. & Soc.Holl. S. John Blair, LL. D. Charles Morton, M. D. Sec. Ac add. James Burrow, Efq; V. P. Impp. Nat. Cur. & Petr op. Soc. John Campbell, Efq; Edward Delaval, Efq; Charles Moss, Lord Bifhop of Samuel Dyer, Efq; Saint David’s. Matthew Duane,Efq; Muf.Brit. Cur. Henry Owen, M. D. Thomas Hollis, Efq; Sir James Porter, Knt. William Hunter, M. D. Matthew Raper, Efq; Thomas Earl of Macclesfield. Samuel Wegg, Efq; Treaf. V. P, This COUNCIL is. to be continued till Saint Andrew’s Day, 1771. 9 2 HOME MEMBERS. Robert Adam, Efq; Charles Lord Cadogan, M\ Swithin Adee, M. D. Brit. Cur. Nathan Alcock, M. D. Sir James Caldwall, Bart. Thomas Aiiguifti, Efq; Charles Lord Camden. John Arbuthnot, Efq; Shuckburgh Afhby, Efq; John Canton, A. M. Anthony Alkew, M. D. Peter Canvane, M. D. Thomas AiHe, Efq; Lord Ch.Cavendish, M. Br. Cur. Sir Jofeph Ayloffe, Bart.