DOCSLIB.ORG

Accurate Observations of Near-Infrared Solar Spectral Irradiance and Water Vapour Continuum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Accurate Observations of Near-Infrared Solar Spectral Irradiance and Water Vapour Continuum Accurate observations of near-infrared solar spectral irradiance and water vapour continuum Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Meteorology University of Reading Jonathan David Charles Elsey September 2018 Declaration I confirm that this is my own work and the use of all material from other sources has been properly and fully acknowledged. - Jonathan Elsey i Abstract This thesis contains analyses of the solar spectral irradiance (SSI) and near-infrared water vapour continuum from high-resolution observations by a ground-based, sun-pointing Fourier transform spectrometer in the wavenumber region 2000-10000 cm-1 (1-5 µm). This was performed primarily using the Langley method on observations during 18 September 2008. Particular focus was placed on a detailed assessment of the uncertainty budget for each of these analyses. The solar spectral irradiance was found to be ~8% lower than the commonly-used satellite-based ATLAS3 SSI in the region 4000-7000 cm-1 (where ATLAS3 is most uncertain). This disagreement with ATLAS3 is in line with several other modern analyses. There is good agreement with ATLAS3 and other spectra in the 7000-10000 cm-1 region (where these spectra are considered more accurate). This thesis contains the first published results of water vapour continuum absorption in the atmosphere in the 1.6 and 2.1 µm atmospheric windows (in which laboratory measurements show some significant disagreement) with robust uncertainties. The derived water vapour continuum in these windows is stronger than the widely-used MT_CKD model (v3.2) by a factor of ~100 and ~5 respectively. These results also show that MT_CKD is a reasonably accurate representation of the continuum in the 4 µm window. These results are broadly consistent with laboratory measurements of the foreign continuum, but are inconsistent with the highest such measurements of the self-continuum. The effect of the self and foreign continuum in atmospheric conditions is assessed, with comparisons to the Langley-derived spectra from this work. These results show that the difference between MT_CKD and this work in the 1.6 and 2.1 µm windows may come primarily from the observed differences in the foreign continuum, with a smaller contribution from the self-continuum. These results show inconsistency with several sets of laboratory room temperature spectra within the experimental uncertainties. ii Acknowledgements First and most obviously is my supervisor Prof. Keith Shine, whose endless patience and insight was instrumental in getting the thesis to the state its in. I’m proud to call you my mentor; if I can be a tenth as expert and generally nice as you are I’ll be doing well! I’d also like to thank Drs. Tom Gardiner and Marc Coleman at the National Physical Laboratory, with whom I worked extensively and who directed the field campaign from which most of the work in this thesis derives. I always enjoyed our meetings, and I hope to keep in contact with you after the PhD ends. The work presented in this thesis would not have been possible without the groundwork laid by Liam Tallis and Kaah Menang during their respective PhDs, and I thank Kaah in particular for our useful meetings and emails. Additional thanks of course go to my monitoring committee, Prof. Richard Allan and Dr. Christine Chiu; your discussions in the committee meetings always helped ground and centre my work and always resulted in fruitful ideas which undoubtedly improved the manuscript. I am also indebted to Dr. Nicolas Bellouin; while the project ultimately went in a different direction to that expected our occasional meetings were always insightful, and your suggestion to use a physical method to obtain aerosol optical depth (the Mie scattering code) was an immense boost to the thesis. There are a million other people I’d like to thank for their love and support. My family, particularly my parents have always been the most supportive people I know and have stopped at nothing to help and encourage me to get where I am today. I love you all, and hope to repay you in kind down the road. I’d like to thank my friends, particularly those who had the misfortune of sharing office space with me on Lyle 3 down the years. The endless Sporcle quizzes and lunchtime board games probably delayed my PhD by a good few weeks, but definitely contributed to keeping me sane when the work wasn’t going so well! I’d also like to thank everyone who lived in House with me over the years, for putting up with me in the bad times and making the good times some of the best I’ve ever had. The last few months of the PhD were definitely some of the most challenging of my life so far, and most of all I thank Sammie (she’s a star) for doing so much to help me get through the thesis and viva, especially in those dark days when it felt like the chances of getting anything submitted were a million to one. Table of Contents: Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1: Introduction 1 1.2: Earth’s energy balance and solar radiation 2 1.3: Absorption of solar radiation in Earth’s atmosphere 4 1.4: The water vapour continuum 8 1.4.1: Introduction 8 1.4.2: Theoretical and experimental perspectives on the continuum 9 1.4.3: Impacts of the continuum for atmospheric science 12 1.5: Objectives of this work 14 Chapter 2: Radiative processes in the terrestrial atmosphere 17 2.1: Molecular spectroscopy 17 2.1.1: Rotational spectroscopy 19 2.1.2: Vibrational transitions 21 2.1.3: Rotational-vibrational transitions 22 2.1.4: Line broadening 24 2.1.4.1: Natural broadening 25 2.1.4.2: Collision broadening 26 2.1.4.3: Doppler broadening 27 2.1.4.4: Voigt and Hartmann-Tran lineshape profiles 28 2.1.5: Water vapour near-infrared spectrum 30 2.2: Solar radiation 32 2.2.1: Solar structure 33 2.2.2: Sun position and distance from Earth 34 2.2.2.1: Solar zenith angle 35 2.2.2.2: Orbit eccentricity 35 2.2.3: Models and observations of solar radiation 36 2.3: Radiative transfer in the terrestrial atmosphere 38 2.3.1: Blackbody radiation 39 2.3.2: The Beer-Bouger-Lambert law and atmospheric transmission 40 2.3.3: Absorption by atmospheric gases 42 2.3.4: Rayleigh scattering 44 2.3.5: Mie scattering and the effect of clouds and aerosols 46 2.3.6: Radiative transfer models 48 2.3.6.1: The Reference Forward Model 49 2.3.6.2: Spectroscopic line databases 52 2.3.6.3: Model atmospheric profiles 53 2.3.6.4: Mie scattering models 54 2.4: Near-IR water vapour continuum absorption 55 Chapter 3: Experimental methods in the CAVIAR field campaign 59 3.1: Introduction 59 3.2: Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy 59 3.2.1: Introduction 59 3.2.2: The Michelson interferometer 60 3.2.3: Optical path difference and interferograms 61 3.2.4: Computational methods in FTIR spectroscopy 63 3.4.2.1: Apodization 64 3.2.4.2: Zero filling 66 3.2.4.3: Phase correction 66 3.3: Retrieval methods 68 3.3.1: Radiative closure 68 3.3.2: Langley method 68 3.3.3: Advantages and disadvantages of Langley and closure methods 69 3.3.4: Calculation of Rayleigh scattering 70 3.3.5: Ångström extrapolation and Mie scattering codes 71 3.3.5.1: Ångström extrapolation 71 3.3.5.2: Mie scattering codes 72 3.3.6: Airmass correction 75 3.3.7: Monte Carlo uncertainty evaluation 76 3.4: CAVIAR field campaigns 77 3.4.1: Camborne campaign 77 3.4.2: Jungfraujoch campaign 90 3.4.3: Details of the CAVIAR FTIR 81 3.4.3.1: The Bruker 125 FTS and optical setup 81 3.4.3.2: Calibration procedure 84 3.4.3.4: FTIR uncertainty budget 88 3.4.3.5: Smoothing and filtering of FTIR data 92 3.4.4: Updates to calibration since Gardiner et al. [2012] 94 3.4.4.1: TSARS stability 94 3.4.4.2: Mirror reflectance calibration 96 3.4.4.3: Phase correction 97 3.4.5: Supplementary measurements 98 3.4.5.1: Radiosonde ascents 99 3.4.5.2: Microtops sunphotometer measurements 101 3.4.5.3: HATPRO microwave radiometer 104 3.4.5.4: FAAM aircraft data 105 3.4.5.5: Model reanalyses 105 Chapter 4: Accurate measurements of NIR solar spectral irradiance between 4000-10000 cm-1 106 4.1: Introduction 106 4.2: Paper manuscript 109 4.2.1: Introduction 109 4.2.2 Current state of measurements 110 4.2.3 Analysis methods 115 4.2.3.1 Langley method 115 4.2.3.2 Radiative closure method 116 4.2.4 Experimental methods 116 4.2.4.1 Calibration 117 4.2.4.2 Spectrometer measurement uncertainty 117 4.2.4.3 Atmospheric state analyses 118 4.2.4.4 Filtering of observed spectra 118 4.2.5 Results and discussions 119 4.2.6 Conclusions 126 4.3: Additional analysis 128 Chapter 5: Observations of the near-IR water vapour continuum in the atmosphere 134 5.1: Introduction 134 5.2: Laboratory measurements and MT_CKD 135 5.2.1: CAVIAR and Tomsk continua 137 5.2.1.1: Self-continuum 137 5.2.1.2: Foreign continuum 139 5.2.2: Grenoble CRDS continua 141 5.2.1.1: Self-continuum 141 5.2.2.2: Foreign continuum 142 5.2.3: Other measurements 142 5.2.4: Synthesis 142 5.2.4.1: Self-continuum 142 5.4.2.2: Foreign continuum 145 5.2.5: Discussion of observation techniques 146 5.2.6: Temperature dependence of the observed self-continuum 147 5.2.7: Atmospheric observations of the near-IR continuum 151 5.3: Derivation of continuum using Camborne measurements 154 5.3.1: Introduction 154 5.3.2: Retrieval of continuum optical depth from observed optical depth 156 5.3.2.1: Observed optical depth 156 5.3.2.2: Optical depth from gaseous absorption 157 5.3.2.3: Optical depth from Rayleigh scattering 159 5.3.2.4: Optical depth from aerosol extinction 160 5.3.2.5: Continuum absorption 162 5.4: Uncertainty budget 164 5.4.1: Observational uncertainties 165 5.4.2: Uncertainties in the model-derived
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Above-Cloud Aerosol Optical Depth from Airborne Observations in the Southeast Atlantic
    Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1565–1590, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1565-2020 © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Above-cloud aerosol optical depth from airborne observations in the southeast Atlantic Samuel E. LeBlanc1,2, Jens Redemann3, Connor Flynn3, Kristina Pistone1,2, Meloë Kacenelenbogen2, Michal Segal-Rosenheimer1,4, Yohei Shinozuka5,2, Stephen Dunagan2, Robert P. Dahlgren6,2, Kerry Meyer7, James Podolske2, Steven G. Howell8, Steffen Freitag8, Jennifer Small-Griswold8, Brent Holben7, Michael Diamond9, Robert Wood9, Paola Formenti10, Stuart Piketh11, Gillian Maggs-Kölling12, Monja Gerber13, and Andreas Namwoonde13 1Bay Area Environmental Research Institute, Moffett Field, CA, USA 2NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA 3University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA 4Department of Geophysics and Planetary Sciences, Porter School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel 5Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, MD, USA 6California State University Monterey Bay, Seaside, CA, USA 7NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA 8University of Hawai‘i at Manoa,¯ Honolulu, HI, USA 9University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA 10LISA, UMR CNRS 7583, Université Paris-Est Créteil et Université Paris Diderot, Institut Pierre Simon Laplace, Créteil, France 11North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa 12Gobabeb Research and Training Center, Gobabeb, Namibia 13Sam Nujoma Marine and Coastal Resources Research Centre (SANUMARC), University of Namibia, Henties Bay, Namibia Correspondence: Samuel E. LeBlanc ([email protected]) Received: 17 January 2019 – Discussion started: 30 January 2019 Revised: 20 November 2019 – Accepted: 21 December 2019 – Published: 7 February 2020 Abstract. The southeast Atlantic (SEA) region is host to indicating the presence of large aerosol particles, likely ma- a climatologically significant biomass burning aerosol layer rine aerosol, in the lower atmospheric column.
    [Show full text]
  • Langley Calibration of Sunphotometer Using Perez's Clearness Index at Tropical Climate
    Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 18: 1103–1117, 2018 Copyright © Taiwan Association for Aerosol Research ISSN: 1680-8584 print / 2071-1409 online doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2016.10.0455 Langley Calibration of Sunphotometer using Perez’s Clearness Index at Tropical Climate Jackson H.W. Chang1*, Nurul H.N. Maizan2, Fuei Pien Chee2, Jedol Dayou2 1 Preparatory Center for Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia 2 Energy, Vibration and Sound Research Group (e-VIBS), Faculty science and Natural Resources, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia ABSTRACT In the tropics, Langley calibration is often complicated by abundant cloud cover. The lack of an objective and robust cloud screening algorithm in Langley calibration is often problematic, especially for tropical climate sites where short, thin cirrus clouds are regular and abundant. Errors in this case could be misleading and undetectable unless one scrutinizes the performance of the best fitted line on the Langley regression individually. In this work, we introduce a new method to improve the sun photometer calibration past the Langley uncertainty over a tropical climate. A total of 20 Langley plots were collected using a portable spectrometer over a mid-altitude (1,574 m a.s.l.) tropical site at Kinabalu Park, Sabah. Data collected were daily added to Langley plots, and the characteristics of each Langley plot were carefully examined. Our results show that a gradual evolution pattern of the calculated Perez index in a time-series was observable for a good Langley plot, but days with poor Langley data basically demonstrated the opposite behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Emissions of Such Gases on a ‘CO2- Equivalent’ Scale
    Department of Meteorology Assessing the potential climate impacts of industrial gases Professor Keith Shine FRS | Professor Eleanor Highwood Summary Human activity leads to the emission of many greenhouse gases that differ from carbon dioxide (CO2) in their effects on climate. International climate policy requires the use of an ‘exchange rate’ to place emissions of such gases on a ‘CO2- equivalent’ scale. These ‘exchange rates’ are calculated using ‘climate emission metrics’, which enable quantitative comparisons to be made of the climate impact of the emission of a given gas with respect to CO2 emissions. Background The assessment reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the World Meteorological Organization / United Nations Environment Programme (WMO/UNEP) Scientific Assessments of Stratospheric Ozone Depletion presented the values of ‘Global Warming Potential’ or GWP. GWP is the metric adopted by the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations’ Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) to allow signatories to report emissions of different greenhouse gases on a CO2-equivalent scale, and is one of a range of possible methods for comparing the climate impact of emissions of different greenhouse gases. How is University of Reading research contributing? Professor Keith Shine played a major role in the international assessments. He led the compilation of databases of an essential input to GWP calculations, namely the so-called ‘radiative efficiency’, or RE, for gases included in the Kyoto Protocol. He and his co-workers within and outside the Department of Meteorology developed and refined methods for calculating RE, using advanced numerical models incorporating new laboratory observations. For many industrial gases, the Reading group has presented the first published RE value, and it has helped resolve instances where results presented in the literature had been in substantive disagreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrics for Comparison of Climate Impacts from Well Mixed
    1 ACCRI Theme 7 2 3 Metrics for comparison of climate impacts from well mixed greenhouse gases and 4 inhomogeneous forcing such as those from UT/LS ozone, contrails and contrail- 5 cirrus 6 7 Piers Forster & Helen Rogers 8 9 Acknowledgement: The numbers in Table 5 and a many of the ideas are derived from a 10 unpublished manuscript led by Keith Shine that Piers Forster and Helen Rogers were co- 11 author of. 12 13 Executive Summary.......................................................................................................... 2 14 1. Introduction and Background ................................................................................. 5 15 2. Review ........................................................................................................................ 8 16 2.1. Current state of science....................................................................................... 8 17 2.1.1. Air travel – its emissions and its trends ...................................................... 8 18 2.1.2. Aviation’s climate impact......................................................................... 10 19 2.1.3. Review of the RF characteristics and uncertainties of mechanisms ......... 12 20 2.1.3.1. Chemistry of importance to aviation..................................................... 12 21 2.1.3.2. Modelling the impact of aviation.......................................................... 14 22 2.1.4. Regional and timescale issues................................................................... 16 23 2.2. Critical
    [Show full text]
  • Trends and Patterns in the Contributions to Cumulative Radiative Forcing from Different Regions of the World
    Trends and patterns in the contributions to cumulative radiative forcing from different regions of the world D. M. Murphya,1 and A. R. Ravishankarab,c,1 aEarth System Research Laboratory, Chemical Sciences Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO 80305; bDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80524; and cDepartment of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80524 Contributed by A. R. Ravishankara, November 12, 2018 (sent for review August 17, 2018; reviewed by John H. Seinfeld and Keith Shine) Different regions of the world have had different historical very short lived, on the order of weeks, so that their radiative patterns of emissions of carbon dioxide, other greenhouse gases, influence is essentially simultaneous with their emission time. and aerosols as well as different land-use changes. One can estimate The relative emissions of GHGs and aerosols have not been the net cumulative contribution by each region to the global mean the same in different regions. One reason is that some regions radiative forcing due to past greenhouse gas emissions, aerosol have had more emissions from industrial activity than other re- precursors, and carbon dioxide from land-use changes. Several gions, and in other regions land-use/land-cover change (LULC) patterns stand out from such calculations. Some regions have had a has been an important driver of emissions. Here we explicitly common historical pattern in which the short-term offsets between deal with only the largest component of the latter––the influence the radiative forcings from carbon dioxide and sulfate aerosols of LULC on CO2.
    [Show full text]
  • Atmosphere Observation by the Method of LED Sun Photometry
    Atmosphere Observation by the Method of LED Sun Photometry A Senior Project presented to the Faculty of the Physics Department California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree Bachelor of Science by Gregory Garza April 2013 1 Introduction The focus of this project is centered on the subject of sun photometry. The goal of the experiment was to use a simple self constructed sun photometer to observe how attenuation coefficients change over longer periods of time as well as the determination of the solar extraterrestrial constants for particular wavelengths of light. This was achieved by measuring changes in sun radiance at a particular location for a few hours a day and then use of the Langley extrapolation method on the resulting sun radiance data set. Sun photometry itself is generally involved in the practice of measuring atmospheric aerosols and water vapor. Roughly a century ago, the Smithsonian Institutes Astrophysical Observatory developed a method of measuring solar radiance using spectrometers; however, these were not usable in a simple hand-held setting. In the 1950’s Frederick Volz developed the first hand-held sun photometer, which he improved until coming to the use of silicon photodiodes to produce a photocurrent. These early stages of the development of sun photometry began with the use of silicon photodiodes in conjunction with light filters to measure particular wavelengths of sunlight. However, this method of sun photometry came with cost issues as well as unreliability resulting from degradation and wear on photodiodes. A more cost effective method was devised by amateur scientist Forrest Mims in 1989 that incorporated the use of light emitting diodes, or LEDs, that are responsive only to the light wavelength that they emit.
    [Show full text]
  • Comment Response 7-1 7 0 0 0 0 a Novel and Correct Attempt to Address Clouds and Aerosols Together
    Expert and Government Review Comments on the IPCC WGI AR5 Second Order Draft – Chapter 7 Comment Chapter From From To To No Page Line Page Line Comment Response 7-1 7 0 0 0 0 A novel and correct attempt to address clouds and aerosols together. In general, the chapter is well-written Noted, no action needed. and up-to-date. There still is some scope to improve the document. My suggestions to follow, basically focus on South Asian region [K KRISHNA MOORTHY, INDIA] 7-2 7 0 0 0 0 Overall I found this to be an impressive chapter, covering many key topics in climate science, for both Noted. Individual comments will be addressed below. feedbacks and forcing. As I will note below, there were a few places where I felt that the reasoning in reaching The semi-direct belongs to AFari as it is initially particular conclusions was not compelling and either the evidence needs to be better presented or the caused by the impact of aerosols on radiation. It can conclusion modified. I also query the chapter title. I did not expect to find information on either the water of course interact with aci. vapour feedback or precipitation in this chapter. On another wider issue, I believe that the ari and aci split generally works well and is a helpful advance, but I think there is really some haziness about where the semi- direct should fall - I think this should be acknowledged [Keith Shine, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland] 7-3 7 0 0 0 0 Better links and more consistency between Chapter 6, specifically Section 6.5.4 and Chapter 7, specifically Taken into account.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-Based Aerosol Optical Depth Measurement Using Sunphotometers
    SPRINGER BRIEFS IN APPLIED SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY Jedol Dayou Jackson Hian Wui Chang Justin Sentian Ground-Based Aerosol Optical Depth Measurement Using Sunphotometers 123 SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/8884 Jedol Dayou • Jackson Hian Wui Chang Justin Sentian Ground-Based Aerosol Optical Depth Measurement Using Sunphotometers 123 Jedol Dayou Jackson Hian Wui Chang Justin Sentian School of Science and Technology Universiti Malaysia Sabah Kota Kinabalu Sabah Malaysia ISSN 2191-530X ISSN 2191-5318 (electronic) ISBN 978-981-287-100-8 ISBN 978-981-287-101-5 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-981-287-101-5 Springer Singapore Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2014940151 Ó The Author(s) 2014 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change: Evidence & Causes 2020
    Climate Change Evidence & Causes Update 2020 An overview from the Royal Society and the US National Academy of Sciences n summary Foreword CLIMATE CHANGE IS ONE OF THE DEFINING ISSUES OF OUR TIME. It is now more certain than ever, based on many lines of evidence, that humans are changing Earth’s climate. The atmosphere and oceans have warmed, which has been accompanied by sea level rise, a strong decline in Arctic sea ice, and other climate-related changes. The impacts of climate change on people and nature are increasingly apparent. Unprecedented flooding, heat waves, and wildfires have cost billions in damages. Habitats are undergoing rapid shifts in response to changing temperatures and precipitation patterns. The Royal Society and the US National Academy of Sciences, with their similar missions to promote the use of science to benefit society and to inform critical policy debates, produced the original Climate Change: Evidence and Causes in 2014. It was written and reviewed by a UK-US team of leading climate scientists. This new edition, prepared by the same author team, has been updated with the most recent climate data and scientific analyses, all of which reinforce our understanding of human-caused climate change. The evidence is clear. However, due to the nature of science, not every detail is ever totally settled or certain. Nor has every pertinent question yet been answered. Scientific evidence continues to be gathered around the world. Some things have become clearer and new insights have emerged. For example, the period of slower warming during the 2000s and early 2010s has ended with a dramatic jump to warmer temperatures between 2014 and 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Diurnal Variability of Total Column NO2 Measured Using Direct Solar and Lunar Spectra Over Table Mountain, California (34.38°N) King-Fai Li1, Ryan Khoury1, Thomas J
    https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2020-173 Preprint. Discussion started: 23 June 2020 c Author(s) 2020. CC BY 4.0 License. Diurnal variability of total column NO2 measured using direct solar and lunar spectra over Table Mountain, California (34.38°N) King-Fai Li1, Ryan Khoury1, Thomas J. Pongetti2, Stanley P. Sander2, Yuk L. Yung2,3 1Department of Environmental Science, University of California, Riverside, California, USA 5 2Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA 3Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA Correspondence to: King-Fai Li ([email protected]) Abstract. A full diurnal measurement of total column NO2 has been made over the Jet Propulsion Laboratory’s Table Mountain Facility (TMF) located in the mountains above Los Angeles, California, USA (2.286 km above mean sea level, 34.38°N, 10 117.68°W). During a representative week in October 2018, a grating spectrometer measured the telluric NO2 absorptions in direct solar and lunar spectra. The total column NO2 is retrieved using a model-based minimum-amount Langley extrapolation, which enables us to accurately treat the non-constant NO2 diurnal cycle abundance and the effects of pollution near the measurement site. The measured 24-hour cycle of total column NO2 on clean days agrees with a 1-D photochemical model calculation, including the monotonic changes during daytime and nighttime due to the exchange with the N2O5 reservoir and 15 the abrupt changes at sunrise and sunset due to the activation or deactivation of the NO2 photodissociation. The observed –2 –1 daytime NO2 increasing rate is (1.29 ± 0.30) × 10 cm h .
    [Show full text]
  • Awards and Prizes 2019
    Promoting the understanding and application of meterology for the benefit of all Awards and Prizes 2019 rmets.org theweatherclub.org.uk metlink.org Awards and Prizes 2019 1 ContentsHighlights Page The Mason Gold Medal 4 The Buchan Prize 5 The L F Richardson Prize 6 Message from Professor Liz Bentley – The FitzRoy Prize 8 Chief Executive The Adrian Gill Prize 9 I am delighted to announce our 2019 Award and The Climate Science Communications Award 10 Prize winners. Each year we take the opportunity to recognise people and teams who have made The Society’s Outstanding Service Award 11 exceptional contributions to weather, climate and associated disciplines as worthy recipients of The Gordon Manley Weather Prize 12 our Awards and Prizes. We received some outstanding nominations this year with many The Malcolm Walker Award 13 individuals being recognised internationally for their remarkable work. Honorary Fellow 14 This year we celebrate our 170th Anniversary. Progress made over the last 170 The International Journal of Climatology Award 15 years in technology and our understanding of weather and climate, as well as the huge public interest, would amaze our founding members. The work of The Quarterly Journal Editor’s Award 15 our Award and Prize winners demonstrates and showcases this progress. Recent extreme weather events underline our dependency on reliable and The Geoscience Data Journal Editor’s Award 16 timely information and the importance of dealing with the threat from man- The Atmospheric Science Letters Editor’s Award 16 made climate change. The Society continues to play a key role in supporting the science and profession for the benefit of all and our Awards and Prizes The Quarterly Journal Reviewer’s Certificate 17 are a crucial part of this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Above Cloud Aerosol Optical Depth from Airborne Observations in the South- East Atlantic Samuel E
    Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-43 Manuscript under review for journal Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discussion started: 30 January 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC BY 4.0 License. Above Cloud Aerosol Optical Depth from airborne observations in the South- East Atlantic Samuel E. LeBlanc1,2, Jens Redemann3, Connor Flynn4, Kristina Pistone1,2, Meloë Kacenelenbogen1,2, 5 Michal Segal-Rosenheimer1,2 ,Yohei Shinozuka1,2, Stephen Dunagan2, Robert P. Dahlgren5,2, Kerry Meyer6, James Podolske2, Steven G. Howell7, Steffen Freitag7, Jennifer Small-Griswold7, Brent Holben6, Michael Diamond8, Paola Formenti9, Stuart Piketh10, Gillian Maggs-Kölling11, Monja Gerber11, Andreas Namwoonde12 10 1Bay Area Environmental Research Institute, Moffett Field, CA 2NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 3University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 4Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 5California State University Monterey Bay, Seaside, CA 15 6NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 7University of Hawai`i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI 8University of Washington, Seattle, WA 9LISA, UMR CNRS 7583, Université Paris Est Créteil et Université Paris Diderot, Institut Pierre Simon Laplace, Créteil, France 20 10NorthWest University, South Africa 11Gobabeb Research and Training Center, Gobabeb, Namibia 12Sam Nujoma Marine and Coastal Resources Research Centre (SANUMARC), University of Namibia, Henties Bay, Namibia 25 Correspondence to: Samuel E. LeBlanc ([email protected]) Abstract The South-East Atlantic (SEA) is host to a climatologically significant biomass burning aerosol layer overlying marine stratocumulus. We present directly measured Above Cloud Aerosol 30 Optical Depth (ACAOD) from the recent ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS (ORACLES) airborne field campaign during August and September 2016.
    [Show full text]