Liberty, Not Birth Control, at Heart of Dispute (Guest Column) Page 1 of 2
Liberty, not birth control, at heart of dispute (guest column) Page 1 of 2 Liberty, not birth control, at heart of dispute (guest column) Published: Friday, February 24, 2012, 10:12 AM Updated: Friday, February 24, 2012, 10:12 AM Guest writer By By Paul A. Long Nearly three years after President Barack Obama called for the protection of conscience rights at the University of Notre Dame, not only has he failed to honor his words, he recently finalized perhaps the most egregious and sweeping intrusion into the religious liberty and conscience rights of every American Paul Long citizen. On Jan. 20 the Obama administration announced through the Secretary of Health and Human Services that religious employers who serve persons of any faith or those of no faith at all must provide in their health benefit plans contraception, sterilization and abortion-inducing drugs. In effect, the mandate forces charitable and educational institutions, against their conscience, to pay for services long held as immoral. The mandate rightly elicited a vociferous national response from nearly every Catholic bishop in the United States, as well as prominent members of Jewish, evangelical, Southern Baptist and other faith traditions, many of whom do not share Catholic teaching on contraception. According to the National Association of Evangelicals: “Freedom of conscience is a sacred gift from God, not a grant from the state. No government has the right to compel its citizens to violate their conscience.” Among editorials opposing the mandate, USA Today said the administration “didn’t just cross the line. It galloped over it. … That’s contrary to both Catholic doctrine and constitutional guarantees of religious freedom.” Due to push-back from nearly every segment of society, and certainly recognizing the political damage his administration had wrought, President Obama on Feb.
[Show full text]