HEADLINE ANATOMY OF THE BY MARIE-JOSÉ TASSIGNON, MD, PhD, FEBO RETROLENTICULAR SPACE

New insights into a long-neglected part of the eye are emerging.

y interest in the retrolenticu- The BIL design was originally manu- in the retrolenticular interface. Later, lar space started in the early factured by PhysIOL in PMMA and other individuals, including Robert 1990s. At that time, I was later by Morcher in foldable hydrophil- Stegmann, MD; Albert Galand, MD, more involved in the posterior ic versions. It was first used in a clinical PhD; Lisa Brothers Arbisser, MD; and segment. My mentor was Jan study in 1999 and was approved by Rupert Menapace, MD, FEBO, pro- MWorst, MD, of the Netherlands, who the Belgian National Social Security in moted the idea of the primary poste- fascinated the world with his beauti- 2004. Only one draft was drawn for rior continuous circular ful images of the vitreous cisternae. the original lens, and the result is now (PPCCC) to be used alone or with the While I was helping him in his lab in used in the clinic in adult and pediatric optic capture technique. Groningen, we were able to color the cases. Modifications have since been Albert Galand was convinced that Berger space in a young adult’s post- developed to provide the lens in a use of the PPCCC alone, without optic mortem eye. toric version and a version for use with capture, would prevent posterior cap- This was, for me, the start of a new a loose, torn, or nearly absent capsule. sular opacification (PCO). We showed, journey. I became convinced that this In 1990, the ophthalmologic however, that reclosure of the PPCCC space was big enough to accommodate world was convinced that the poste- occurred in about one-third of cases in a new lens design, and I filed the idea rior capsule was the most precious which PPCCC was used in combination and concept of that new lens design structure in the eye. Behind that with a regular BIL IOL, and this occurred with the US Patent Office in October membrane, the vitreous was consid- within the first 2 postoperative years.1 1997. The lens was named the double- ered a black box, eagerly waiting to The reason was that lens epithelial cells rhexis lens to accentuate the fact that prolapse and cause macular edema, were able to grow either on the anterior both an anterior and posterior capsu- retinal detachment, etc. vitreous hyaloid or on the posterior sur- lorhexis were required to implant the It was hard to convince the oph- face of the IOL.2 lens properly. Another name for the thalmic community that this was concept that was mentioned in the not true, but I had the help of giants ANSWERING THE SKEPTICS original patent application was the such as Howard Gimbel, MD, MPH, As my colleagues and I developed bag-in-the-lens, and that is the name FRCSC, who invented the posterior the concept of the BIL, animal mod- used for the lens as it exists today capsulorhexis and who used the optic els showed excellent results. This (Bag-In-The-Lens, or BIL, Morcher). capture technique to place the optic encouraged us to proceed to using the

32 CATARACT & TODAY EUROPE | JANUARY 2019 MASTERING THE POSTERIOR CAPSULE s

“THE POSTERIOR CAPSULE CAN run by the ESCRS. In to observe the Berger space, the that large multicenter anterior hyaloid, and the ligament study, CME was not of Wieger—structures that have not BE SAFELY REMOVED WITHOUT increased after PPCCC and BIL been visible until the advent of these implantation.5 new imaging technologies.9 We will RISK OF LEAKAGE. ... HOWEVER, Regarding Point No. 3, retinal have to wait for more studies and pub- detachment after PPCCC was stud- lications on this topic in the coming IN THE EVENT OF RUPTURE ied by Menapace after optic capture, years in order to know more about the and he did not find an increased risk incidence of anterior hyaloid detach- of postoperative retinal detachment.6 ment and the risk for retinal detach- OF THE ANTERIOR BIL We also studied retinal detachment ment. What we surely know is that in the after PPCCC and BIL implantation. the anterior hyaloid detaches with age HYALOID, LEAKAGE clinic.3 We found that the incidence of retinal and that the prevalence of its detach- This was detachment after BIL implantation was ment is highest after WAS EXTREMELY all good comparable to that after in-the-bag in patients 60 years of age or older news in favor of implantation, if not slightly lower.7 and in myopes. In the presence of a my approach, but Long-term postoperative follow-up detached ligament of Wieger, we can HIGH.” skeptics continued (not yet published) shows a small no longer use the term Berger space to question me about advantage for the BIL technique com- but rather retrolenticular interface. The the safety of systemati- pared with in-the-bag implantation. retrolenticular interface is still not fully cally performing PPCCC. Based on these findings, we con- unraveled. My response was three- cluded that there is no inferiority of By using the BIL in children and fold, and I committed myself the BIL technique compared with the infants, Van Looveren and colleagues to proving three points: traditional implantation technique were able to describe a new sub- regarding the postoperative incidence group of congenital cataract based s Point No. 1. The posterior capsule is of CME and retinal detachment. on the presence of anterior interface not the most important membrane dysgenesis.10 This is another amazing defining the anterior and posterior ANTERIOR VERSUS POSTERIOR new description made possible by segments of the eye; the anterior HYALOID intraoperative OCT. Not only can the hyaloid is; Why do we still have an increased anterior interface present a dysgenesis, risk of retinal detachment after cata- these authors concluded, but, due to s Point No. 2. The incidence of cystoid ract surgery? Although small, the risk the extremely bad condition of this macular edema (CME) is not is elevated in patients after cataract dysgenesis, the eye will not be able to increased after PPCCC; and surgery compared to the population fulfill the reflex of emmetropization as without surgery. What is the cause? Is programmed. s Point No. 3. The incidence of retinal it the anterior hyaloid or the posterior detachment is not increased after hyaloid that plays a role? MATERIAL NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR PCO PPCCC. In order to answer this question One thing we surely know is that the regarding the role of the posterior biomaterial of an IOL is not respon- To prove Point No. 1, we used an hyaloid, we have participated in the sible for the rate of PCO. We studied ocular flurophotometer to measure MYOPRED study, a multicenter study this by implanting lenses of two dif- the leakage of fluorescein, a very small run by the ESCRS that is enrolling high ferent designs made with the same molecule, into the anterior vitreous myopes (axial length >25 mm) with or biomaterial. We found that, when space after PPCCC and after inad- without posterior hyaloid detachment using the lens-in-the-bag technique, vertent vitreous loss during cataract prior to surgery.8 No results have been the incidence of PCO was much higher surgery. The results were absolutely posted from this study, so we cannot than using the BIL design.11 convincing. The posterior capsule can yet disclose details. PCO development is a result of be safely removed without risk of leak- However, we already know that the foreign body reaction of the eye age. Conversely, however, in the event anterior hyaloid detachment can against the IOL, which is initiated of rupture of the anterior hyaloid, leak- occur; it can be present preoperatively by lens epithelial cells. These cells, age was extremely high.4 or can occur after cataract surgery. We however, can have very little impact In an effort to prove Point No. 2, have used intraoperative OCT, incor- when the biomaterial is implanted we participated in the PREMED study porated into an operating microscope, using the BIL implantation technique.

JANUARY 2019 | CATARACT & REFRACTIVE SURGERY TODAY EUROPE 33 J - - Graefes Arch Clin Exp Graefes Arch Clin Exp . 2016;42(7):1037-1045. D, FEBO h . 2006;32(12):2085-2090. J Cataract Refract Surg . 2015;41(11):2430-2437. J Cataract Refract Surg 2016;56(4):222-226. 2008;246(6):787-801. [email protected] Financial disclosure: Patent ownership (Morcher) Past Chair and Chief, Department of Past Chair and Chief, Department of , Antwerp University Hospital, Ophthalmology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.   n n 6. Menapace R. Posterior capsulorhexis combined with optic buttonholing: an capsulorhexis combined with optic 6. Menapace R. Posterior intraocular in-the-bag implantation of sharp-edged alternative to standard of 1000 consecutive cases. lenses? A critical analysis Ophthalmol. of rhegmatog den Heurck JJ, Boven KB, et al. Incidence 7. Tassignon MJ, Van lens implantation. after bag-in-the-lens intraocular enous retinal detachment al. Cumulative neodymium:YAG laser 11. Leysen I, Coeckelbergh T, Gobin L, et implantation: rates after bag-in-the-lens and lens-in-the-bag comparative study. n Cataract Refract Surg on retinal detachment after lens 8. Influence of posterior vitreous detachment NCT03152747. https:// surgery in myopic eyes (MYOPRED). clinicaltrials.gov. Accessed November 27, 2018. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03152747. intraoperative optical coherence 9. Tassignon MJ, Ní Dhubhghaill S. Real-time about the Berger space. tomography imaging confirms older concepts Ophthalmic Res. J-P, Tassignon MJ. Im 10. Van Looveren J, Van Gerwen V, Timmermans vitreolenticular interface in congenital munohistochemical characteristics of the unilateral posterior cataract. MARIE-JOSÉ TASSIGNON, MD, P J - - . J Cataract Br J Ophthalmol. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci n . 2018;44(7):836-847. 2005;31(2):398-405. 2003;29(12):2330-2338. The coming years will be dedicatedbe will years coming The J Cataract Refract Surg 2. De Groot V, Vrensen GF, Willekens B, et al. In vitro study on the closure 2. De Groot V, Vrensen GF, Willekens B, eye. of posterior capsulorrhexis in the human 2003;44(5):2076-2083. 3. De Groot V, Tassignon MJ, Vrensen GF. Effect of bag-in-the-lens implanta tion on posterior capsule opacification in human donor eyes and rabbit eyes. Cataract Refract Surg. 4. De Groot V, Hubert M, Van Best JA, et al. Lack of fluorophotometric evidence of aqueous-vitreous barrier disruption after posterior capsulorhexis. Refract Surg. 5. Wielders LHP, Schouten JSAG, Winkens B, et al; ESCRS PREMED study group. Randomized controlled European multicenter trial on the prevention of cystoid macular edema after cataract surgery in diabetics: ESCRS PREMED Study Report 2. 2003:84(10):1117-1120. technologies of today have nowhave today of technologies con and them visualize to us allowed existence. their firm arestructures these why learning to rolesprecise their what and present helpalso may They eye. the within are understanding better a develop to us accommodation. of MJ. Quantitative 1. van Tenten Y, De Groot V, Wuyts FL, Tassignon period. measurement of PCCC area in the postoperative - | JANUARY 2019

retrolenticular (when the(when space of Berger of space or In order to understand the anteriorthe understand to order In we went back to history books tobooks history to back went we previousof colleagues our how learn structuresthese described centuries remainedsince have that concepts and novelThe years. many so for dormant PhD, MRCSI(Ophth), FEBOS-CR; Luc FEBOS-CR; MRCSI(Ophth), PhD, collaborationin I, and MD; Os, Van will panel, international large a with inter anterior the detail in describe thisof structures named the and face book,the for research our In interface. interface, also called the called also interface, space Iattached), still is ligament Wieger theon book a read to all you invite bypublished be to soon is that BIL ofeditors The Publishing. Springer MB, Dhubhghaill, Ni Sorcha book, this COMING SOON COMING SOON CATARACT & REFRACTIVE SURGERY TODAY EUROPE

MASTERING POSTERIOR THE CAPSULE 34 s