DOCSLIB.ORG

Sorbitol from France

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sorbitol from France SORBITOL FROM FRANCE Determination of the Commission in Investigation No. 731-TA-44 (Preliminary) Under the Tariff Act of 1930, Together With the Information Obtain-ed in the Investigation USITC PUBLICATION 1168 JULY 1981 United States lnternatlonal Trade Commission I Washington, D.C. 20436 UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS Bill Alberger, Chairman Michael J. Calhoun, Vice Chairman Catherine Bedell Paula Stern Kenneth A. Mason, Secretary to the Commission This report prepared by: Miriam A. Bishop, Investigator Bonnie Noreen, Office of Industries Anita Miller, Office of Economics Michael Jennison, Office of the General Counsel Catherine Field, Office of the General Counsel Vera A. Libeau, Supervisory Investigator Address all communications to Office of the Secretary United States International Trade Commission Washington, D.C. 20436 C 0 N T E N T S Page Determination---------------------------------------------------------- 1 Views of the Commission------------------------------------------------ 3 Information obtained in the investigation Introduction-----------------------------~------------------------- A- 1 The product: · Description---------------------------------------------------- A- 1 The product imported from France------------------------------- A- 2 Uses----------------------------------------------------------- A- 2 U.S. tariff treatment------------------------------------------ A- 3 Nature and extent of alleged sales at less than fair value--------- A- 4 U.S. market and channels of distribution--------------------------- A- 4 The domestic industry: U.S. producers------------------------------------------------- A- 6 U.S. importers------------------------------------------------- A- 7 Foreign producers-------------------------------------------------- A- 8 The question of injury or likelihood thereof: U.S. production, capacity, and capacity utilization------------ A- 8 U.S. producers' commercial shipments--------------------------- A-11 Inventories---------------------------------------------------- A-14 Apparent U.S. consumption-------------------------------------- A-17 U.S. employment and wages-------------------------------------- A-17 Financial performance of U.S. producers------------------------ A-20 The question of the causal relationship between alleged LTFV imports from France and the alleged injury: U.S. imports and market penetration of alleged LTFV imports-------- A-22 Prices------------------------------------------------------------- A-24 Lost sales--------------------------------------------------------- A-31 Appendix A. Notice of Commission's investigation and conference------- A-33 Appendix B. Department of Commerce's notice of initiation of anti- dumping investigation------------------------------------------------ A-35 Appendix c. Calender of public conference----------------------------- A-37 Tables 1. Sorbitol: Selected firms' imports, by types and by sources, 1978-1980, January-May 1980, and January-May 1981---------------- A- 9 2. Sorbitol: U.S. production, by types and by firms, 1978-80, January­ May 1980, and January-May 1981----------------------------------- A-10 3. Sorbitol: U.S. production, production capacity, and capacity utilization, by firms, 1978-80, January-May 1980, and January- May 1981--------------------------------------------------------- A-12 4. Sorbitol: U.S. producers' connnercial shipments, by types and by firms, 1978-80, January-May 1980, and January-May 1981----------- A-13 5. Sorbitol: U.S. producers' inventories, by types and by firms, as of . Dec. 31 of 1978-80, May 31, 1980, and May 31, 1981--------------- A-15 6. Sorbitol: U.S. production, imports for consumption, net change in inventories, exports, and apparent consumption, 1978-80, January- May 1980, and January-May 1981----------------------------------- A-18 C 0 N T E N T S 7. Sorbitol: u.s. producers' open-market shipments, imports for con­ sumption, net change in inventories, exports, and apparent open­ market consumption, 1978-80, January-May 1980, and January- May 1981-------------------------------------------------------- A-18 8. Average number of employees, total and production and related workers engaged in the manufacture of sorbitol, and wages paid to and hours worked by production and related workers producing sorbitol, by firms, 1978-80, January-May 1980, and January-May 1981-------------------------------------------- A-19 9. Profit-and-loss experience of selected U.S. producers of sorbitol on their sorbitol operations, by firms, 1978-80----------------- A-21 10. U.S. producers' cash flow from operations on sorbitol, by selected firms, 1978-80-------------------------------------------------- A-22 11. Sorbitol: U.S. imports for consumption, by sources, 1978-80, January-May 1980, and January-May 1981----------------- A-23 12. Sorbitol: Imports by selected U.S. importers, by sources, 1978-80, January-May 1980, and January-May 1981-------------------------- A-25 13. Crystalline sorbitol: U.S. producers' weighted average prices to major end users, by firms and by periods, January 1978-May 1981------------------------------------------- A-26 14. Crystalline sorbitol: Weighted average prices to end users of imported and domestic merchandise, by periods, January 1978-May-1981------------------------------------------- A-27 15. Liquid sorbitol: U.S. producers' weighted average prices to major end users, by firms and by periods, January 1978- May 1981-------------------------------------------------------- A-28 16. Liquid sorbitol: Weighted average prices to end users of imported and domestic merchandise, by periods, January 1978- May 1981-------------------------------------------------------- A-29 17.· Liquid sorbitol: Merck's and Lonza's prices to major toothpaste producers, by periods, January 1978-May 1981-------~------------ A-30 Note.--Information which would disclose the confidential operations of individual concerns may not be published and has, therefore, been deleted from this report. These deletions are indicated by asterisks. 1 0123456789 2 0123456789 3 0123456789 4 0123456789 5 0123456789 6 0123456789 7 0123456789 8 0123456789 9 0123456789 10 0123456789 A-1 A-0123456789 A-2 A-0123456789 A-3 A-0123456789 A-4 A-0123456789 A-5 A-0123456789 A-6 A-0123456789 A-7 A-0123456789 A-8 A-0123456789 A-9 A-0123456789 A-10 A-0123456789 A-11 A-0123456789 A-12 A-0123456789 A-13 A-0123456789 A-14 A-0123456789 A-15 A-0123456789 A-16 A-0123456789 A-17 A-0123456789 A-18 A-0123456789 A-19 A-0123456789 A-20 A-0123456789 A-21 A-0123456789 A-22 A-0123456789 A-23 A-0123456789 A-24 A-0123456789 A-25 A-0123456789 A-26 A-0123456789 A-27 A-0123456789 A-28 A-0123456789 A-29 A-0123456789 A-30 A-0123456789 A-31 A-0123456789 A-32 A-0123456789 A-33 A-0123456789 A-34 A-0123456789 A-35 A-0123456789 A-36 A-0123456789 A-37 A-0123456789 A-38 A-0123456789 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Apr-May 1980
    MODERN DRUMMER VOL. 4 NO. 2 FEATURES: NEIL PEART As one of rock's most popular drummers, Neil Peart of Rush seriously reflects on his art in this exclusive interview. With a refreshing, no-nonsense attitude. Peart speaks of the experi- ences that led him to Rush and how a respect formed between the band members that is rarely achieved. Peart also affirms his belief that music must not be compromised for financial gain, and has followed that path throughout his career. 12 PAUL MOTIAN Jazz modernist Paul Motian has had a varied career, from his days with the Bill Evans Trio to Arlo Guthrie. Motian asserts that to fully appreciate the art of drumming, one must study the great masters of the past and learn from them. 16 FRED BEGUN Another facet of drumming is explored in this interview with Fred Begun, timpanist with the National Symphony Orchestra of Washington, D.C. Begun discusses his approach to classical music and the influences of his mentor, Saul Goodman. 20 INSIDE REMO 24 RESULTS OF SLINGERLAND/LOUIE BELLSON CONTEST 28 COLUMNS: EDITOR'S OVERVIEW 3 TEACHERS FORUM READERS PLATFORM 4 Teaching Jazz Drumming by Charley Perry 42 ASK A PRO 6 IT'S QUESTIONABLE 8 THE CLUB SCENE The Art of Entertainment ROCK PERSPECTIVES by Rick Van Horn 48 Odd Rock by David Garibaldi 32 STRICTLY TECHNIQUE The Technically Proficient Player JAZZ DRUMMERS WORKSHOP Double Time Coordination by Paul Meyer 50 by Ed Soph 34 CONCEPTS ELECTRONIC INSIGHTS Drums and Drummers: An Impression Simple Percussion Modifications by Rich Baccaro 52 by David Ernst 38 DRUM MARKET 54 SHOW AND STUDIO INDUSTRY HAPPENINGS 70 A New Approach Towards Improving Your Reading by Danny Pucillo 40 JUST DRUMS 71 STAFF: EDITOR-IN-CHIEF: Ronald Spagnardi FEATURES EDITOR: Karen Larcombe ASSOCIATE EDITORS: Mark Hurley Paul Uldrich MANAGING EDITOR: Michael Cramer ART DIRECTOR: Tom Mandrake The feature section of this issue represents a wide spectrum of modern percussion with our three lead interview subjects: Rush's Neil Peart; PRODUCTION MANAGER: Roger Elliston jazz drummer Paul Motian and timpanist Fred Begun.
    [Show full text]
  • 2209 - Sydney Siegelman V
    Appeal No. 2209 - Sydney Siegelman v. US - 20 May, 1980. _____________________________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES COAST GUARD vs. MERCHANT MARINER'S DOCUMENT Issued to: Sydney Siegelman (REDACTED) DECISION OF THE VICE COMMANDANT ON APPEAL UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 2209 Sydney Siegelman This appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46 United States Code 239(g) and Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 28 August 1979, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at New Orleans, Louisiana, after a hearing at New Orleans, Louisiana, on 16 July 1979, suspended Appellant's document for a period of four months upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The single specification of the charge of misconduct found proved alleges that Appellant, while serving as able seaman aboard SS AUSTRAL ENDURANCE, under authority of his Merchant Mariner's Document did, at or about 1210 on 1 July 1979, while said vessel was at sea, wrongfully commit an assault and battery without legal cause, provocation, or justification upon the person of one Phillip MOULIC, causing serious and severe bodily harm to him. At the hearing, Appellant represented himself. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and specification. The Investigating Officer introduced into evidence the testimony of three witnesses, and two documents. In defense Appellant testified and introduced into evidence two documents. Subsequent to the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge entered a written decision in which he concluded that the charge file:////hqsms-lawdb/users/KnowledgeManagementD...%20R%201980%20-%202279/2209%20-%20SIEGELMAN.htm (1 of 5) [02/10/2011 9:53:06 AM] Appeal No.
    [Show full text]
  • Median and Average Sales Prices of New Homes Sold in United States
    Median and Average Sales Prices of New Homes Sold in United States Period Median Average Jan 1963 $17,200 (NA) Feb 1963 $17,700 (NA) Mar 1963 $18,200 (NA) Apr 1963 $18,200 (NA) May 1963 $17,500 (NA) Jun 1963 $18,000 (NA) Jul 1963 $18,400 (NA) Aug 1963 $17,800 (NA) Sep 1963 $17,900 (NA) Oct 1963 $17,600 (NA) Nov 1963 $18,400 (NA) Dec 1963 $18,700 (NA) Jan 1964 $17,800 (NA) Feb 1964 $18,000 (NA) Mar 1964 $19,000 (NA) Apr 1964 $18,800 (NA) May 1964 $19,300 (NA) Jun 1964 $18,800 (NA) Jul 1964 $19,100 (NA) Aug 1964 $18,900 (NA) Sep 1964 $18,900 (NA) Oct 1964 $18,900 (NA) Nov 1964 $19,300 (NA) Dec 1964 $21,000 (NA) Jan 1965 $20,700 (NA) Feb 1965 $20,400 (NA) Mar 1965 $19,800 (NA) Apr 1965 $19,900 (NA) May 1965 $19,600 (NA) Jun 1965 $19,800 (NA) Jul 1965 $21,000 (NA) Aug 1965 $20,200 (NA) Sep 1965 $19,600 (NA) Oct 1965 $19,900 (NA) Nov 1965 $20,600 (NA) Dec 1965 $20,300 (NA) Jan 1966 $21,200 (NA) Feb 1966 $20,900 (NA) Mar 1966 $20,800 (NA) Apr 1966 $23,000 (NA) May 1966 $22,300 (NA) Jun 1966 $21,200 (NA) Jul 1966 $21,800 (NA) Aug 1966 $20,700 (NA) Sep 1966 $22,200 (NA) Oct 1966 $20,800 (NA) Nov 1966 $21,700 (NA) Dec 1966 $21,700 (NA) Jan 1967 $22,200 (NA) Page 1 of 13 Median and Average Sales Prices of New Homes Sold in United States Period Median Average Feb 1967 $22,400 (NA) Mar 1967 $22,400 (NA) Apr 1967 $22,300 (NA) May 1967 $23,700 (NA) Jun 1967 $23,900 (NA) Jul 1967 $23,300 (NA) Aug 1967 $21,700 (NA) Sep 1967 $22,800 (NA) Oct 1967 $22,300 (NA) Nov 1967 $23,100 (NA) Dec 1967 $22,200 (NA) Jan 1968 $23,400 (NA) Feb 1968 $23,500 (NA) Mar 1968
    [Show full text]
  • List of Technical Papers
    Program Reports Report Title Copies Number Number 1: Program Prospectus. December 1963. 2 Program Design Report. February 1965. 2 Number 2: Supplement: 1968-1969 Work Program. February 1968. 1 Supplement: 1969-1970 Work Program. May 1969. 0 Number 3: Cost Accounting Manual. February 1965. 1 Number 4: Organizational Manual. February 1965. 2 Guide Plan: Central Offices for the Executive Branch of State Number 5: 2 Government. April1966. XIOX Users Manual for the IBM 7090/7094 Computer. November Number 6: 2 1966. Population Projections for the State of Rhode Island and its Number 7: 2 Municipalities--1970-2000. December 1966. Plan for Recreation, Conservation, and Open Space (Interim Report). Number 8: 2 February 1968. Rhode Island Transit Plan: Future Mass Transit Services and Number 9: 2 Facilities. June 1969. Plan for the Development and Use of Public Water Supplies. Number 10: 1 September 1969. Number 11: Plan for Public Sewerage Facility Development. September 1969. 2 Plan for Recreation, Conservation, and Open Space (Second Interim Number 12: 2 Report). May 1970. Number 13: Historic Preservation Plan. September 1970. 2 Number 14: Plan for Recreation, Conservation, and Open Space. January 1971. 2 Number 15: A Department of Transportation for Rhode Island. March 1971. 2 State Airport System Plan (1970-1990). Revised Summary Report. Number 16: 2 December 1974. Number 17: Westerly Economic Growth Center, Planning Study. February 1973. 1 Plan for Recreation, Conservation, and Open Space--Supplement. June Number 18: 2 1973. Number 19: Rhode Island Transportation Plan--1990. January 1975. 2 Number 20: Solid Waste Management Plan. December 1973. 2 1 Number 21: Report of the Trail Advisory Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Loudon County (Page 1 of 17) Office: Chancery Court
    Loudon County (Page 1 of 17) Office: Chancery Court Type of Record Vol Dates Roll Format Notes Enrollments Jul 1870 - Jul 1876 17 35mm Minutes 1-2 Nov 1870 - Nov 1889 18 35mm Minutes 3-4 Nov 1889 - May 1907 19 35mm Minutes 5-6 May 1907 - Nov 1921 20 35mm Minutes 7-8 Nov 1921 - May 1930 21 35mm Minutes 9-10 May 1930 - Nov 1940 22 35mm Minutes 11-12 Nov 1940 - May 1945 23 35mm Minutes 13-14 May 1945 - May 1952 24 35mm Minutes 15-16 May 1952 - Jul 1957 25 35mm Minutes 17-18 Jul 1957 - Dec 1962 26 35mm Minutes 19 Dec 1962 - Nov 1965 27 35mm Minutes 20-21 Nov 1965 - Jul 1971 A-8035 35mm Minutes 22-25 Jul 1971 - May 1977 A-8036 16mm Minutes 26-28 May 1977 - Nov 1982 A-8037 16mm Minutes 29-31 Nov 1982 - Jan 1987 A-8038 16mm Minutes, Final Decree Appeals 1 May 1936 - Mar 1968 28 35mm Loudon County (Page 2 of 17) Office: Circuit Court Type of Record Vol Dates Roll Format Notes Minutes, Civil and Criminal 1-2 Sep 1870 - Apr 1882 2 35mm Minutes, Civil and Criminal 3-4 Apr 1882 - Aug 1894 3 35mm Minutes, Civil and Criminal 5-6 Dec 1894 - Feb 1908 4 35mm Minutes, Civil and Criminal 7-8 Jun 1908 - Jul 1916 5 35mm Minutes, Civil and Criminal 9-10 Oct 1916 - Feb 1923 6 35mm Minutes, Civil and Criminal 11 Feb 1923 - Feb 1927 7 35mm Minutes, Civil 12 Feb 1927 - Nov 1931 7 35mm Minutes, Civil 13-14 Feb 1932 - Aug 1950 8 35mm Minutes, Civil 15-16 Sep 1950 - Jun 1962 9 35mm Minutes, Civil 17-18 Jun 1962 - Apr 1967 10 35mm Minutes, Civil 19-20 Apr 1967 - Jul 1968 11 35mm Minutes, Civil 21-26 Dec 1968 - Jun 1973 A-8039 16mm Minutes, Civil 27-31 Jul 1973 - Mar
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural-Food Policy Review: Perspectives for the 1980S
    United States % Department of Agriculture Agricultural*Food AgEconomics andulture Statistics Service AFPR-4 Policy Review: Perspectives for the 1980's Page 1 Global Prospects 27 Changes in the Farm Sector 59 Inflation 69 Capacity for Greater Productior" 81 Transportation 95 Trade Issues 107 Commodity Programs 119 Policy Setting 135 A Policy Approach -rH---. Agricultural-Food Policy Review: Perspectives for the 1980's. Economics and Statistics Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. AFPR4. Preface The nine articles collected here provide background for discussions on new legislation. to replace the Food and Agriculture Act of 1977, which expires this year. New legislation will be influenced by the much altered nature of U.S. farming. * Almost all easily available cropland, including that once idled by farm programs, is now back in production. Millions of acres of potential cropland remain, but are not as productive or need to be improved (cleared, drained, irrigated, for example). * The long period of overproduction, burdensome surpluses, and depressed farm prices now seems to be behind us, although there may still be occasional years of excess production. * International food needs now heavily influence the well-being of U.S. agriculture in any given year. * The character of U.S. farming has changed as fewer but larger farms now produce most of our total agricultural production. Agricultural-FoodPolicy Review is an occasional publication that addresses important policy and legislative matters pertaining to agriculture and food. Washington, D.C. 20250 April 1981 Contents Page Foreword .............................................. v Global Prospects for Agriculture. PatrickM. O'Brien ........................ 2 Abstract: The eighties are likely to show continued strong growth in foreign demand for agricultural products, but reduced growth in foreign production.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oakland County Aclu Collection
    THE OAKLAND COUNTY ACLU COLLECTION Papers, 1970-1984 (Predominantly, 1978-1983) 4 ½ linear feet Accession Number 1170 L.C. Number The papers of the Oakland County American Civil Liberties Union (OCACLU) were placed in the Archives of Labor and Urban Affairs in April of 1984 by James Lafferty and were opened for research in April of 1990. James Lafferty began his work in the area of civil rights when he served as executive secretary for the National Lawyer's Guild in Detroit from 1964-67 and later as legal supervisor for a group of storefront lawyers operations. In his private practice he worked with other attorneys opposing American involvement in Vietnam, counseling young men of draft age. He also ran as a peace candidate in 1966 for Congress in the 17th District against Martha Griffiths. In 1975 Lafferty moved his firm Lafferty & Van Dyke to Birmingham, MI. He became interested in the issue of senior housing (PRIDE) after the initial two ballot defeats. He was elected as a permanent co-chairman to PRIDE and organized its steering committee. Eventually the activities of PRIDE (People Rallying in Defense of Equality) vs. the City of Birmingham lead to the city being sued by the United States government based on racially discriminatory practices. The timing of the PRIDE activities coincided with the formation of the Oakland County ACLU, a process begun in 1970 and finally consummated in December of 1979, based on the recommendation of the Metropolitan Detroit Branch of the ACLU to the Michigan State ACLU Board. The 1979 petition stated as some of the pressing civil liberty issues for the new organization to address as: over 1000 active Oakland County members of the ACLU, the Oakland County jail situation, the policy of giving lie detector tests to rape victims, housing rights of the elderly and retarded in Oakland County, the Oakland County prosecutor's attempts to reinstate the death penalty in Michigan.
    [Show full text]
  • Jules Borker (Preliminary Ruling Requested by the Conseil De L'ordre Des Avocats À La Cour De Paris)
    ORDER OF THE COURT OF 18 JUNE 1980 1 Jules Borker (preliminary ruling requested by the Conseil de l'Ordre des Avocats à la Cour de Paris) "Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bar Council" Case 138/80 Preliminary rulings — Reference to the Court — National court within the meaning of Art. 177 of the Treaty— Concept (EEC Treaty, Art. 177) A reference cannot be made to the Court Avocats [Bar Council] has before it, not in pursuance of Article 177 of the EEC a case which it is under a legal duty to Treaty except by a court or tribunal try, but a request for a declaration which is called upon to give judgment in relating to a dispute between a member proceedings intended to lead to a of the Bar and the courts or tribunals of decision of a judicial nature. That is not another Member State. the case where a Conseil de l'Ordre des In Case 138/80 (Reference for a preliminary ruling requested by the Conseil de l'Ordre des Avocats à la Cour de Paris) JULES BORKER 1 — Language of the Case: French. 1975 ORDER OF 18. 6. 1980 — CASE 138/80 1. By a decision of 27 May 1980, which was received at the Court on 9 June 1980, the Conseil de l'Ordre des Avocats à la Cour de Paris [Bar Council of the Cour de Paris], referring to Article 177 of the EEC Treaty, submitted to the Court for a preliminary ruling a question on the interpret­ ation of Article 59 et seq.
    [Show full text]
  • Maps Cited by Congress When Designating Wilderness
    Maps Summary Table In 2003 long-time NPS Wilderness Coordinator Wes Henry prepared this table that was intended for inclusion in the updated Reference Manual 41 – Wilderness Management. Wes died soon thereafter. PEER has updated the table to reflect information through 2014. RM 41: Section F: DRAFT January 21, 2003 Maps Cited by Congress when Designating Wilderness. The table lists in: Column 2: maps cited by Congress when designating NPS wilderness (in chronological order by date of enactment); Column 3: date of an official legal description prepared after designation, and Column 4: whether a post-enactment official boundary map was prepared. NPS AREA – CONGRESSIONAL DATE OF DATE OF WILDERNESS MAP NUMBER OFFICIAL OFFICAL MAP DATE AND DATE, CITED LEGAL IN LAW DESCRIPTION Craters of the 131-91,000 December 1970 NPS cited Moon – Oct. 1970 March 1970 legislative map Petrified Forest - NP-PF-3320-O December 1970 NPS cited October 1970 November 1967 legislative map Lava Beds – NM-LB-3227H December 1972 NPS cited October 1972 August 1972 legislative map Lassen Volcanic – NP-LV-9013C June 1973 NPS cited October 1972 August 1972 legislative map Point Reyes – 612-90,000-B May 1978 February 1977 October 1976 September 1976 Bandelier – 315-20,014-B August 1978 August 1978 October 1976 May 1976 Black Canyon of 144-20,017 January 1977 January 1977 the Gunnison – May 1973 October 1976 Chiricahua - 145-20,007-A May 1978 January 1977 October 1976 September 1973 Great Sand Dunes 140-20,006-C December 1976; January 1980 October 1976 February 1976 Revised:
    [Show full text]
  • Day by Day Care Newsletter: October 1979 - June 1980 Center for Public Affairs Research (CPAR) University of Nebraska at Omaha
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Publications Archives, 1963-2000 Center for Public Affairs Research 1979 Day by Day Care Newsletter: October 1979 - June 1980 Center for Public Affairs Research (CPAR) University of Nebraska at Omaha Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cparpubarchives Part of the Demography, Population, and Ecology Commons, and the Public Affairs Commons Recommended Citation (CPAR), Center for Public Affairs Research, "Day by Day Care Newsletter: October 1979 - June 1980" (1979). Publications Archives, 1963-2000. 75. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cparpubarchives/75 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Public Affairs Research at DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications Archives, 1963-2000 by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VOLUME I, Number 1 October, 1979 LEAVES I like to rake the leaves Division of Continuing Education for Western Nebraska, Into a great big hump. part of the University of Nebraska system. Then I go. back a little way, Bend both knees, I don't have to introduce Marcia Nance and And jump! Jean Mellor to you because you know the good work that they have been doing. Marcia and Jean have agreed to continue on the team so you will see them at some of the workshops. They will be working with us through Kearney State which will represent us in the mid-state area. I'm Ginger Burch, coordinator of the Day Care Training and Service Program. We are really excited about the program this year.
    [Show full text]
  • Price Changes in 1980: Double-Digit Inflation Persists Consumer Prices Jumped 12.4 Percent and Producer Prices, 11
    Price changes in 1980: double-digit inflation persists Consumer prices jumped 12.4 percent and producer prices, 11. 7 percent; costs for energy items rose, but mortgage interest rates fluctuated wildly and a severe drought raised food prices CRAIG HOWELL, DAVE CALLAHAN, AND OTHERS For the second consecutive year, the rate of inflation in 12.8-percent advance in 1979 .' The slowdown in 1980 both retail and primary markets registered double-digit was partly due to the deceleration in the rate of increase increases. The Consumer Price Index for All Urban for the finished energy goods index, which climbed 27.7 Consumers (CPI-U) moved up 12.4 percent, following a percent, after soaring 58 .0 percent in 1979 . Finished 13.3-percent advance during 1979. Prices for all major consumer food prices rose 7.3 percent in 1980, virtually consumer expenditure categories, except apparel and en- the same as during the previous 12 months . Prices for tertainment, increased at least 10 percent over the year. finished goods other than food and energy rose more in Mortgage interest costs advanced 27.6 percent, com- 1980 (11 .0 percent) than in 1979 (9 .3 percent); on aver- pared with a 34.7-percent climb in the preceding year. age these prices advanced rapidly in early 1980 and Prices paid by consumers for energy items were up 18.1 then moderated as the year progressed. At the earlier percent. Although this was larger than the increases re- stages of processing, the price index for intermediate corded for most other cpl components, it was half as goods moved up 12.5 percent over the year, after in- large as the 1979 surge of 37.4 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Uniform CPA Examination Unofficial Answers May 1980 to November 1981 American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
    University of Mississippi eGrove American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Examinations and Study (AICPA) Historical Collection 1982 Uniform CPA examination unofficial answers May 1980 to November 1981 American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Board of Examiners Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/aicpa_exam Part of the Accounting Commons, and the Taxation Commons Recommended Citation American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Board of Examiners, "Uniform CPA examination unofficial answers May 1980 to November 1981" (1982). Examinations and Study. 120. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/aicpa_exam/120 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Historical Collection at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Examinations and Study by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Uniform CPA Examination May 1980 to November 1981 Unofficial Answers American Institute of AICPA Certified Public Accountants Uniform CPA Examination May 1980 to November 1981 Unofficial Answers Published by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants 1211 Avenue of the Americas New York, N.Y. 10036-8775 Copyright © 1982 American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc. 1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, N.Y. 10036-8775 1234567890 Ex 898765432 Foreword The texts of the Uniform Certified Public Accountant Examinations, prepared by the Board of Examiners of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and adopted by the examining boards of all states, territories, and the District of Columbia, are periodically published in book form. Unofficial answers to these examinations appear twice a year as a supplement to the Journal of Accountancy.
    [Show full text]