DOCSLIB.ORG

In the Missouri Supreme Court

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In the Missouri Supreme Court IN THE MISSOURI SUPREME COURT NO. SC 89610 SHONNIE NEWTON, et al., Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., Respondent. And MICHAEL NOLTE and BARBIE NOLTE, Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., Respondent. SUBSTITUTE BRIEF OF APPELLANTS J. Kent Emison Grant L. Davis Langdon & Emison Davis, Bethune & Jones, L.L.C. 911 Main Street 1100 Main Street, Ste. 2930 P.O. Box 220 P.O. Box 26250 Lexington, Missouri 64067 Kansas City, Missouri 64196 Phone: (660) 259-6175 Phone: (816) 421-1600 Fax: (660) 259-4571 Fax: (816) 472-5972 Edward D. Robertson, Jr. #27183 Mary D. Winter #38328 Anthony L. DeWitt #41612 BARTIMUS, FRICKLETON, ROBERTSON & GORNY, P.C. 715 Swifts Highway Jefferson City, MO 65109 573-659-4454, 573-659-4460 Fax ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS CONTENTS STATEMENT OF FACTS..............................................................................................10 A. EVIDENCE REGARDING OTHER SIMILAR INCIDENTS..............................13 1. Post-Newton/Nolte Incidents Presented During Ford’s Opening Argument. ..14 2. The 11 Post-Upgrade Incidents. .......................................................................18 B. EVIDENCE REGARDING IMPEACHMENT OF EXPONENT’S CREDIBILITY. ...........................................................................................................34 C. THE GRUSH-SAUNBY REPORT..................................................................41 D. EVIDENCE REGARDING THE FORD PINTO.............................................44 E. THE NHTSA ODI REPORT............................................................................51 F. PROCEDURAL HISTORY. ................................................................................56 ARGUMENT...................................................................................................................63 I....................................................................................................................................63 A. Standard of Review.......................................................................................64 B. Argument ...........................................................................................................65 C. Conclusion.....................................................................................................89 II...................................................................................................................................91 A. Standard Of Review. .....................................................................................91 B. Factual Background. .....................................................................................92 2 C. The Impeachment Evidence Was Admissible And Proper For Cross- Examination.............................................................................................................97 D. The Evidence Regarding Subia Mulatte And Joe Dierker's Notebook Was Admissible For Purposes Of Contradiction...........................................................103 E. Prejudice Resulted From The Court's Error................................................104 F. Conclusion...................................................................................................106 III. ..............................................................................................................................107 A. Standard Of Review. ...................................................................................107 B. Factual Background. ...................................................................................108 C. The Grush-Saunby Report Was Admissible For Purposes Of Impeachment. ........................................................................................................111 D. The Grush-Saunby Report Was Admissible.....................................................116 E. Prejudice Resulting From The Trial Court's Error......................................118 F. Conclusion...................................................................................................119 A. Standard Of Review. ...................................................................................120 B. The Trial Court Failed To Determine The Trustworthiness Of The ODI Evidence. ...............................................................................................................120 C. Conclusion...................................................................................................128 V. ...............................................................................................................................129 3 A. Standard Of Review. ...................................................................................130 B. The Trial Court Abused Its Discretion And Failed To Carefully Consider Legal Relevance. ...................................................................................................131 C. The Trial Court Failed To Allow Plaintiffs To Impeach Mr. Ridenour Regarding His Credibility......................................................................................137 D. Prejudice Resulted From The Court's Error................................................144 E. Conclusion...................................................................................................145 VI. ..............................................................................................................................146 CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................150 4 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Alberswerth v. Alberswerth, 184 S.W.3d 81, 100 (Mo. App. 2006) ............................130 Aliff v. Cody, 26 S.W.3d 309, 321 (Mo.App. W.D.2000)......................80, 104, 118, 144 Black v. State, 151 S.W.3d 49, 56 (Mo. banc 2004).......................................99, 112, 141 Bolivar Farmers Exchange v. Eagon, 467 S.W.2d 95, 98 (Mo. App. 1971).........103, 116 Brawley & Flowers, Inc. v. Gunter, 934 S.W.2d 557, 562 (Mo. App. 1996) .......101, 115 Brown v. Yettaw, 116 S.W.3d 733, 736 (Mo. App. 2003)......................................91, 107 Bryan v. State, 134 S.W.3d 795, 800 (Mo. App. 2004) ................................................136 Budding v. Garland Floor Co., Inc., 939 S.W.2d 419, 426 (Mo. App. 1996)103, 104, 117 Bynote v. National Super Markets, Inc., 891 S.W.2d 117, 123 (Mo. banc 1995) 101, 115 Capra v. St. Charles, 932 S.W.2d 851, 855 (Mo. App. 1996)..................................passim Coulter v. Michelin Tire Corp., 622 S.W.2d 421, 433 (Mo. App. 1981)..............101, 115 Crawford v. Shop-N Save Warehouse, Inc., 91 S.W.3d 646, 652 (Mo. App. 2002) ....146 Cummings v. Tepsco Tennessee Pipe and Supply Corp., 632 S.W.2d 498, 501 (Mo. App. 1982).........................................................................................................103, 116 Edgell v. Leighty, 825 S.W.2d 325 (Mo. App. 1992) ...................................................121 Enke v. Anderson, 733 S.W.2d 462, 469 (Mo. App. 1987) ..................................101, 115 Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Fleischer, 772 S.W.2d 809, 818 (Mo. App. 1989)(emphasis added) ..................................................................................................................92, 108 5 Gage v. Morse, 933 S.W.2d 410, 421 (Mo. App. S.D. 1996) ........................................80 Govreau v. Nu-Way Concrete Forms, Inc., 73 S.W.3d 737, 743 (Mo. App. 2002).....103, 104, 117 Guthrie v. Missouri Methodist Hospital, 706 S.W.2d 938, 942-43 (Mo. App. 1986) ....98 Henson v. Board of Education, 948 S.W.2d 202, 209 (Mo. App. 1997) ..............101, 115 In the Matter of Care and Treatment of Cokes v. State, 183 S.W.3d 281, 285 (Mo. App. 2005).......................................................................................................................... 130 Jefferson-Gravois Bank v. Cunningham, 674 S.W.2d 561, 565 (Mo. App. 1984) .........99 Jerry Bennett Masonry, Inc. v. Crossland Const. Co., Inc., 171 S.W.3d 81, 98-99 (Mo. App. 2005).........................................................................................................131, 134 Johnson v. Creative Restaurant Management, 904 S.W.2d 455, 459 (Mo. App. 1995)134 Koontz v. Ferber, 870 S.W.2d 885, 894 (Mo. App. 1993)............................................146 Kuehne v. State, 107 S.W.3d 285, 298 (Mo. App. W.D. 2003)...............................passim Lester v. Sayles, 850 S.W.2d 858, 864 (Mo. banc 1993)................................................86 Long v. St. John’s Regional Health Center, 98 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Mo. App. 2003)92, 99, 108, 130 Mitchell Engineering Co. v. Summit Realty Co., Inc., 647 S.W.2d 130, 141 (Mo. App. 1982)..................................................................................................101, 103, 115, 116 Nelson v. Waxman, 9 S.W.3d 601, 604 (Mo. banc 2000).............................................142 Nicklasson v. State, 105 S.W.3d 482 (Mo. banc 2003)...................................................80 Payne v. Cornhusker Motor Lines, Inc., 177 S.W.3d 820, 836 (Mo. App. 2005) 114, 131 Peters v. General Motors Corp. 200 S.W.3d 1 (Mo. App. W.D. 2006) ..........................89 6 Porter v. Toys 'R' Us-Delaware, Inc., 152 S.W.3d 310, 318 (Mo. App. 2004).............132 Powell v. Normal Lines, Inc., 674 S.W.2d 191, 196 (Mo. App. 1984).........................142 Reno v. Wakeman, 869 S.W.2d 219, 223 (Mo. App. 1993) .........................................130 Richcreek
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Automotive Maintenance Data Base for Model Years 1976-1979
    . HE I 8.5 . A3 4 . D0T-TSC-NHTSA-80-26 DOT -HS -805 565 no DOT- TSC- NHTSA 80-3.6 ot . 1 I— AUTOMOTIVE MAINTENANCE DATA BASE FOR MODEL YEARS 1976-1979 PART I James A. Milne Harry C. Eissler Charles R. Cantwell CHILTON COMPANY RADNOR, PA 19079 DECEMBER 1980 FINAL REPORT DOCUMENT IS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC THROUGH THE NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE, SPRINGFIELD, VIRGINIA 22161 Prepared For: U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Research and Special Programs Administration Transportation Systems Center Cambridge, MA 02142 . NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Govern- ment assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse pro- ducts or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturer's names appear herein solely because they are con- sidered essential to the object of this report. NOTICE The views and conclusions contained in the document are those of the author(s) and should not be inter- preted as necessarily representing the official policies or opinions, either expressed or implied, of the Department of Transportation. Technical Report Documentation Page 1* Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. _ DOT-HS-805 565 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Dote Automotive Maintenance Data Base for Model Years December 1980 1976-1979 6. Performing Orgonization Code Part I 8. Performing Organization Report No. 7. Author's) J ame s A Milne , Harry C. Eissler v\ DOT-TSC-NHTSA-80-26 Charles R. Cantwell 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Downfall of Ford in the 70'S
    Downfall of Ford in the 70’s Interviewer: Alex Casasola Interviewee: Vincent Sheehy Instructor: Alex Haight Date: February 13, 2013 Table of Contents Interviewee Release Form 3 Interviewer Release Form 4 Statement of Purpose 5 Biography 6 Historical Contextualization 7 Interview Transcription 15 Interview Analysis 35 Appendix 39 Works Consulted 41 Statement of Purpose The purpose of this project was to divulge into the topic of Ford Motor Company and the issues that it faced in the 1970’s through Oral History. Its purpose was to dig deeper into that facts as to why Ford was doing poorly during the 1970’s and not in others times through the use of historical resources and through an interview of someone who experienced these events. Biography Vincent Sheehy was born in Washington DC in 1928. Throughout his life he has lived in the Washington DC and today he resides in Virginia. After graduating from Gonzaga High School he went to Catholic University for college and got a BA in psychology. His father offered him a job into the car business, which was the best offer available to him at the time. He started out a grease rack mechanic and did every job in the store at the Ford on Georgia Ave in the 50’s. He worked as a mechanic in the parts department and became a owner until he handed down the dealership to his kids. He got married to his wife in 1954 and currently has 5 kids. He is interested in golf, skiing and music. When he was younger he participated in the Board of Washington Opera.
    [Show full text]
  • In Re Ford Motor Company Securities Litigation 00-CV-74233
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Master C e No. 00-74233 In re FORD MOTOR CO. CLASS A TION SECURITIES LITIGATION The Honorable Avern Cohn DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 l r" CJ'^ zti ^ OVERVIEW 1. This is an action on behalf of all purchasers of the common stock of Ford Motor Company, Inc. ("Ford") between March 31, 1998 and August 31, 2000 (the "Class Period"). This action arises out of the conduct of Ford to conceal from the investment community defects in Ford's Explorer sport-utility vehicles equipped with steel-belted radial ATX tires manufactured by Bridgestone Corp.'s U.S. subsidiary, Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. ("Bridgestone/Firestone"). The Explorer is Ford's most important product and its largest selling vehicle, which has accounted for 25% of Ford's profits during the 1990s. Due to the success of the Explorer, Ford became Bridgestone/ Firestone's largest customer and sales of ATX tires have been the largest source of revenues and profits for Bridgestone/Firestone during the 1990s. During the Class Period, Ford and Bridgestone had knowledge ofthousands ofclaims for and complaints concerning ATX tire failures, especially ATX tires manufactured at Bridgestone/Firestone's Decatur, Illinois plant during and after a bitter 1994-1996 strike, due to design and manufacturing defects in, and under-inflation of, the tires, which, when combined with the unreasonably dangerous and unstable nature of the Explorer, resulted in over 2,200 rollover accidents, 400 serious injuries and 174 fatalities by 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • 1977 Gas Mileage Guide: Second Edition
    How To Mid-Size-Between 130 and 160 cubic feet inside (pages 23-24). Use This Guide Large-160 or more cubic feet inside (pages 24-25). This "Gas Mileage Guide" gives /th estimated fuel economy in miles per gallonl( P6 of 1977 Truck Classes model year cars, station wagons, a4 d ;fit trucks. These vehicles were certified by EPA as of Small Pickups-Trucks having Gross Vehicle January 24, 1977. Weight Ratings (truck weight plus carrying All new car dealers are required tb capacity) under 4500 pounds (page 25). Standard Pickups-Trucks having GVWR's this Guide in their showroom. over 4500 pounds (page 26). Van/Speclal Purpose class-All other light How The Guide lo 0rg+$zed trucks (pages 27-28). In each size class, you will find the following To help you compare the fuel information on every model type: sized vehicles, the passenger wagons are grouped into Manufacturer and car line names their interior size, an The manufacturers are listed alphabetically. Under utillty. This means each manufacturer, the car lines are listed approximately the alphabetically. same class. Trucks are grouped in terms of gross vehicle weight Vehicle Description Each line in the Guide shows a different modei rn a car line. For each model. there are Car Classes designations of the engine size and the type of transmission ("A" for automat~c:"M" Two-Seater-Cars designed for manual). The type of each vehicle's fuel only two adults (page 20). system is indicated either by "FI" for fuel injection or by the number of barrels in the Sedans , .
    [Show full text]
  • Auction Items January 21, 2014
    GILA COUNTY Notice of Public On-Line Auction The following are brief descriptions and photos of the items that will be auctioned, beginning on Tuesday, January 21, 2014. 2003 Chevrolet Venture 1986 Chevrolet Celebrity 2000 Ford Crown Victoria 1994 Ford Tempo 1993 Ford Bronco 4x4 1993 Chevrolet Blazer 1994 Ford Taurus SW 1999 GMC Yukon 1997 Ford F-250 4x4 GILA COUNTY Notice of Public On-Line Auction The following are brief descriptions and photos of the items that will be auctioned, beginning on Tuesday, January 21, 2014. 1988 Chevrolet 1/2 ton 4x4 1994 Chevrolet S-10 Pickup 2000 Ford Taurus 4 Door 1999 Dodge Caravan 2003 Chevrolet Impala 2003 Chevrolet 1/2 ton 1996 Plymouth Van 1997 Chevrolet Astro 2002 Ford F150 GILA COUNTY Notice of Public On-Line Auction The following are brief descriptions and photos of the items that will be auctioned, beginning on Tuesday, January 21, 2014. 1995 Toyota Tacoma 2005 Chevrolet Malibu 1999 Ford F150 2000 Chevrolet Van 1968 Corvette 1997 Ford Ranger 2000 GMC Savana 1998 Dodge Caravan 2000 Pontiac Grand Prix GILA COUNTY Notice of Public On-Line Auction The following are brief descriptions and photos of the items that will be auctioned, beginning on Tuesday, January 21, 2014. 1994 Ranger 18’ and 1990 Walker Trailer 1966 Dodge Wrecker 1993 GMC Utility Van 1974 Mack Water Truck 1979 Ford Dump Truck 1994 Chevrolet Service Truck 1970 GM Crane Photos coming soon for: 1994 GMC Safari 1999 Lincoln Navigator 1999 Ford F250 1998 Chevrolet Lumina 1998 Ford F150 1981 Pettibone Forklift GILA COUNTY Notice of Public On-Line Auction The following are brief descriptions and photos of the items that will be auctioned, beginning on Tuesday, January 21, 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • V Indiana COLUMBIA
    was elected vice president and in would go into the plant, create some Death of Edsel Ford 1919, after the Ford family had situation that would be difficult to out all or Steel bought minority stockholders, adjust handle from an adminis- Ingot Capacity NEW YORK BOND MARKET Stock Averages MORTGAGE he was made president. trative and then walk off n. z. hobo quotation! fur- viewpoint Chi & N W in 4s87 n 57 New Orl TAM 5s SB C 71 Besides his automotive and nished by the Associated — an Interests, leave it for the son to discover Chi ft N W ien 3'/a 687 56% New Orl TAM *fes 66 67 is is no Pres*. Rails. Util. Stks. Puts War Job Edsel was president of the Detroit and adjust. Boosted Chi Rys 1st B> 37_ 54% N 7 A Putman 4s S3 551* Indust, LOANS Again 3,000,000 TODAY’S Net change +.8'+.3 +.1 +.5 Institute of Arts, whose collections SALES. CRlftP 4%s 62_ 33% N T cent ref 6s 2013 651* Probably nothing that transpired (Reported In Dollars.! CRl&P4%i80_ 11% N Y Cent 311s 46 10115s Close today x72.1 x26.9 34.4 x51.5 numerous Favorable Rate he enriched with notable in Domestic_ 15 067 500 C R 1 ft P gen 4s 88 50 NY C ref his career caused Edsel as 4yts2013 A 591* Prev. day.. 71.3 26.6 34.3 51.0 HIST DEED OF TRUST ONLY and he was a trustee of the Foreign 257 000 C R 1 ft P in 4s 88 reg 46% N Y Cent eon 4s 98 65 On Father's Shoulders gifts, much — Week unpleasantness certainly Tons Since 1941 U.
    [Show full text]
  • Alec Issigonis, Part IV
    VOLUME 14, NUMBER 1 JANUARY-FEBRUARY 2009 INSIDE THIS ISSUE UPCOMING EVENTS EDITOR’S BIT Alec Issigonis, Part IV ......................1 Sat., Feb. 14: Valentine Tour (9:30 The Roundabout is now back on AGM Announcement........................2 am; see page 7 for details) schedule! This is the quiet time of Autojumble (more ads online) ..........7 Tue., Mar. 3: 7 pm, Rainbow Station, year when we start planning for good British Car Sales 2008 .....................3 Burnaby; VCB AGM and election. things to come. Please help your old British Motor Industry, 1945-1994....4 Social time and nibbles. Join us! Editor by taking photos and providing Calendar (1st draft) for 2009............8 Tue., Apr. 7: Meeting TBA write-ups of events you attend. I Edsel Dream Became Nightmare.....6 Sun., Apr 12: Ft. Langley Run always need content. I’d enjoy feed New Bodies for Old MGBs ...............7 Tue., May 5: Meeting TBA back on the series on the British auto Truck Museum Meeting....................5 Sat., May 16: VanDusen ABFM industry. This is a good time to start Valentine Run...................................7 See the complete Calendar on p. 8! getting our cars ready for spring!. BRING YOUR VALENTINE ON THE VALENTINE TOUR ON FEBRUARY 14! Alec Issigonis - Part IV: The Issigonis Lightweight Special Racing Car Walter Reynolds During his early years, Alec Issigonis toyed with making cars for himself, one of which was the Light- weight Special, the topic of this Part Four of the Issigonis story. The remaining topics will be reviewed in future issues of the Roundabout, and are detailed at the end of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Police Vehicles
    Ford Fleet 2010 Police Vehicles POLICE LINE DO NOT CROSS POLICE LINE DO NOT CROSS CONTActs contents GOVERNMENT ACCOUNT STEVE HOE STATE & LOCAL GOVERNMENT ANN CREVISTON Crown Victoria Police Interceptor Escape Hybrid ............................................... 14 – 15 MANAGERS Western States: AK, AZ, CA, HI, ID, MT, SALES ANALYST AL, AR, FL, GA, KY, LA, MI, MS, MO, NC, NV, OR, UT, WA, WY OH, SC, TN, VA, WV DON COBB Office: (916) 705-5350 MONA MLYNARCZYK Office: (313) 206-3324 First & Foremost ........................................ 02 – 03 Explorer XLT – Special Service Package ....... 16 – 17 Northeast States: CT, DE, MA, MD, ME, E-mail: [email protected] Office: (313) 390-1054 E-mail: [email protected] NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT E-mail: [email protected] Office: (860) 647-0099 BRYAN TAYLOR JOE VECCHIO Protects & Serves ....................................... 04 – 05 Expedition/Expedition EL E-mail: [email protected] Southeast States: AL, FL, GA, NC, SC, CT, DE, DC, IN, ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, TN, VA, WV VEHICLE SPECIAL ORDER NY, PA, RI, VT Vehicle Specifications ................................. 06 – 07 Special Service Vehicle (SSV) ...................... 18 – 19 DON DEWAR Office: (678) 984-4201 Office: (313) 206-3325 North Central States: IA, IL, IN, KY, MI, E-mail: [email protected] MARISOL CASARES E-mail: [email protected] MN, ND, NE, OH, SD, WI Special Paint Quality Upfitting ......................................... 08 – 11 F-150 – XL SuperCrew .................................. 20 – 21 Office: (317) 575-4121 Office: (313) 390-0855 GOVERNMENT SALES MANAGER E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Equipment Mounting ................................. 12 E-Series – Van & Wagon ................................ 22 – 23 CRAIG FettY TONY Gratson South Central States: AR, CO, KS, LA, Office: (313) 390-1041 FORD CREDIT MUNICIPAL MO, MS, NM, OK, TX E-mail: [email protected] FINANCE PROGRAM REGIONAL Appearance ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • American Granada, Monarch and Versailles Parts Interchange
    American Granada, Monarch and Versailles Parts Interchange (1975 – 1980) Compiled by Jeff Roblin B.Comm, CA, Webmaster American Granada, Monarch and Versailles Registry www.gmv-registry.com American Granada, Monarch and Versailles Parts Interchange Index Basic Parts Page 1000-1250 Wheels, Hubs and Drums 1007 Wheel 9 1102 Hub and Rotor Assembly – Front 12 1126 Brake Drum – Rear 13 1130 Wheel Cover 14 2001-2285 Brakes – Service 2005 Power Brake Cylinder Assembly 16 2026 Brake Rotor – Rear Right 13 2027 Brake Rotor – Rear Left 13 2120 Caliper Assembly – Front Right 17 2121 Caliper Assembly – Front Left 17 2140 Brake Master Cylinder 19 2505-2900 Brakes – Parking 2552 Caliper Assembly – Rear Right 17 2553 Caliper Assembly – Rear Right 17 3000-3359 Front Suspension and Steering Linkage 3000 Front Suspension (Knee) Assembly 21 3078 Lower Control Arm 22 3082 Upper Control Arm 23 3105 Spindle – Right 24 3106 Spindle – Left 24 3400 Hydro-Boost 3494 Power Steering Pressure Hose – Hydro-Boost 25 3500-3764 Steering Gear 3500 Steering Column Assembly 28 3504 Steering Gear Assembly 29 3674 Power Steering Pump 31 3719 Power Steering Pressure Hose – Except Hydro Boost 25 2 American Granada, Monarch and Versailles Parts Interchange Index Basic Parts (continued) Page 4000-4296 Rear Axle 4000 Axle Assembly 36 4001 Carrier Assembly 38 4010 Axle Housing 41 4209 Ring Gear and Pinion 43 4234 Axle Shaft 52 4600-4859 Drive Shaft 4602 Drive Shaft 53 5200-5299 Muffler and Exhaust Pipe 5212 Catalytic Converter 57 5250 Catalytic Converter with Y-Pipe 57 5300-5832 Rear
    [Show full text]
  • Ethics: an Alternative Account of the Ford Pinto Case
    Ethics: An Alternative Account of the Ford Pinto Case Course No: LE3-003 Credit: 3 PDH Mark Rossow, PhD, PE, Retired Continuing Education and Development, Inc. 22 Stonewall Court Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677 P: (877) 322-5800 [email protected] © 2015 Mark P. Rossow All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced in any manner without the written permission of the author. 1. Introduction 1.1 Conventional account The Ford Pinto case is today considered a classic example of corporate wrong-doing and is a mainstay of courses in engineering ethics, business ethics, philosophy, and the sociology of white- collar crime. The conventional account of the case goes something like this: In the mid-1960’s, Ford decided to rush a new subcompact car, the Pinto, into production to meet the growing competition from foreign imports. Because development was hurried, little time was available to modify the design when crash tests revealed a serious design defect: to provide adequate trunk space, the gas tank had been located behind rather than on top or in front of the rear axle. As a result, the Pinto was highly vulnerable to lethal fires in rear-end collisions and was in fact a “fire trap” and a “death trap.” Ford decided to ignore the defect anyway, because re-design would have delayed the entry of the car into the market and caused a potential loss of market share to competitors. As reports of fire- related deaths in Pintos began to come in from the field and as further crash tests re- affirmed the danger of the fuel-tank design, Ford decision-makers made an informed and deliberate decision not to modify the design, because doing so would harm corporate profits.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution No. 2020-087 a Resolution of the City
    RESOLUTION NO. 2020-087 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELK GROVE AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO SELL OR OTHERWISE DISPOSE OF SURPLUS CITY PROPERTY IN THE FORM OF LAW ENFORCEMENT VEHICLES, LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIPMENT, AND TRANSIT VEHICLES WHEREAS, the City of Elk Grove purchased vehicles to be utilized by the Elk Grove Police Department and Transit Division in the normal course of their duties; and WHEREAS, staff has designated fourteen law enforcement vehicles as surplus, as they have reached the end of their service life based on years in service, high mileage, and/or frequency/cost of repairs, and collision damage, and three transit vehicles as surplus as they have reached the end of their service life based on years in service, high mileage, and/or high frequency/cost of repairs; and WHEREAS, the law enforcement vehicles are equipped with emergency response equipment that shall be removed prior to any public sale; and WHEREAS, Elk Grove Municipal Code Chapter 3.42 specifies the terms and conditions for the disposition of surplus City property; and WHEREAS, the City of Elk Grove desires to surplus fourteen law enforcement vehicles, their emergency response equipment, and three transit vehicles, and sell at fair market value or otherwise dispose of the assets. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Elk Grove hereby authorizes the Finance Director to exercise the sale or disposal of surplus City property in the form of fourteen law enforcement vehicles, including the disposal of any associated emergency response equipment, and three transit vehicles as shown in Exhibit A to this resolution, incorporated herein by reference, through sale to other law enforcement agencies, re-use by the City, or designated as unsalvageable, based on the needs of the City; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that proceeds from any sale or disposal of the surplus vehicles shall be deposited into the Facilities and Fleet Internal Services Fund and Transit Fund, as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Newfoundland Antique and Classic Car Club (NACCC) July - Sept
    Newfoundland Antique and Classic Car Club (NACCC) July - Sept. 2008 2007 / 08 Year End Report Or it could be called the “Rear End Report” Have a guess who? How many Newfie mechanics does it take to fix a car? President’s Message Where did the summer go? It will soon be time to put our cars away for another winter. Although the weather wasn’t very cooperative few shows were attended in and around the city. Classic Wheels 2008 was a success as in past years. From the proceeds, presentations will be made to Easter Seals and the VOCM Cares Foundation. Two scholarships were awarded as part of the 1 st . Annual NACCC Scholarship Program. The Bergs Run was attended by more than a dozen children with their parents or chaperons from Easter Seals. Before the season comes to an end we have another chance to show our cars at the 2 nd . Annual Ladies Show and Wheels of Summer in Clarenville. As NACCC President for 2007/08 I would like to thank the NACCC Executive for their dedication and hard work. It has been my pleasure to represent the NACCC and its members. I hope you enjoyed the cruisin’ season. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Newfoundland Antique & Classic Car Club 1 NACCC Committees – 2007 / 08 Executive Committee: President: Jack Hill Vice President: Harold Howlett Treasurer: Moira Farrell Secretary: Moira Farrell / Brenda Hollohan Social Director: Cindy Howlett Past President: Connie Hilliard Newsletter: Moira Farrell Sick Committee: Richard Kearley Merchandise: Ron Snow Webmaster: Ed Farrell, Jr. Year-end Financial Report NACCC had a successful year with 145 paid members six of whom were new members.
    [Show full text]