DOCSLIB.ORG

→ What the GNOME Desktop Gets Right and KDE Gets Wrong KDE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Stories Firehose All Popular Polls Deals Submit Search Login or Sig2n9 u8p Topics: Devices Build Entertainment Technology Open Source Science YRO Follow us: Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system Nickname: Password: 6-20 characters long Public Terminal Log In Forgot your password? Sign in with Google Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Close Discover the Many Uses of Python & Strive Towards a Successful IT System Administration Career with 60 Hou×rs of Training for 95% off Ask Slashdot: Is KDE Dying? Posted by EditorDavid on Saturday August 20, 2016 @11:34PM from the demise-of-desktop-development? dept. A long-time loyal KDE user "always felt that it was the more complete and integrated of the many Linux desktop environments...thus having the most potential to win over new Linux converts." And while still using KDE exclusively without any major functional issues, now Slashdot reader fwells shares concerns about the future of desktop development, along with a personal opinion -- that KDE is becoming stale and stagnant: KDE-Look.org, once a fairly vibrant and active contributory site, has become a virtual ghost town... Various core KDE components and features are quite broken and have been so for some time... KDEPIM/KMail frankly seems targeted specifically at the poweruser, maintaining over many years its rather plain and arguably retro interface. The Konqueror web browser has been a virtual carcass for several years, yet it mysteriously remains an integral component... So, back to my opening question... Is KDE Dying? Has innovation and development evaporated in a development world dominated by the mobile device? And, if so, can it be reinvigorated? Will the pendulum ever swing back? Can it? Should it? The original submission has some additional thoughts on Windows 10 and desktop development -- but also specific complaints about KDE's Recent Items/Application Launcher History and the KDE theming engine (which "seems disjointed and rather non-intuitive".) The argument seems to be that KDE lacks curb appeal to fulfill that form-over- function preference of the larger community of users, so instead it's really retaining the practical appeal of "my 12 year old Chevy truck, feature rich for its time... Solid and reliable, but definitely starting to fade and certainly lacking some modern creature comforts." So leave your own thoughts in the comments. Does desktop development need to be reinvigorated in a world focused on mobile devices -- and if so, what is its future? And is KDE slowly dying? free kde linux → How SSL/TLS Encryption Hides Malware What the GNOME Desktop Gets Right and KDE Gets Wrong KDE Turns 19 KDE Plasma 5.5 Has Matured Past the Point of Plasma 4 Project Neon Will Bring Users Up-to-Date KDE Packages Submission: Is KDE Dying? New Linux Trojan Is A DDoS Tool, a Bitcoin Miner, and Web Ransomware Ask Slashdot: Is KDE Dying? 199 More | Reply Login Ask Slashdot: Is KDE Dying? Post Load All Comments S30e aFruchll 27909 A Cbbomremvieantetsd L0o Hg iIdnd/eCnreate an Account C/Soemaments Filter: AScllore: I5nsightful I4nformative I3nteresting F2unny 1The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way. ›0 W-1 hat does Netcraft say? (Score:3, Interesting) b19y 90 1M0o0r0e1 |0 R00ep1l0y1 L0o0g1i1n ( 652467 ) on Saturday August 20, 2016 @11:38PM (#52741041) P erhaps the users have spoken and most prefer the Gnome2/MATE/Cinnamon style interface. The rest of us are on Awesome, Xfce or something else. NRicepklny atom Teh:i s Share tPwaisttsewr ofardce: b6o-o2k0 lcinhkaeradcinte rs long F laPgu basli cIn Taeprpmroipnraial te UsiLnogg CIninn amFoorgno t( Syocuorr pea:s2s)word? by HalAtWork ( 926717 ) Close Fits all my and family's needs. Most of my GUI apps are GTK but QT ones fit in fine. Close Re:What does Netcraft say? (Score:5, Insightful) by Daemonik ( 171801 ) on Sunday August 21, 2016 @03:56AM (#52741785) Homepage The 'people' didn't choose Gnome, much in the same way the 'people' haven't chosen systemd. The distribution packagers chose to make Gnome their default and the 'people' once presented with a choice tend to stick to that choice. Until the last 5-10 years there were only a couple of distro's that really took the effort to showcase KDE, mostly Mandrake and SuSE. The sad thing was Gnome was never up to KDE's maturity and cohesion. It was launched and chosen as the default because of baseless fears over the licensing of Qt back in the 90's, not technical ability. Reply to This Parent Share twitter facebook linkedin Flag as Inappropriate Re: (Score:3, Informative) by drinkypoo ( 153816 ) It was launched and chosen as the default because of baseless fears over the licensing of Qt back in the 90's, Back in the 90s the license was an issue. It's not the same now. Re: (Score:3, Informative) by donaldm ( 919619 ) Linux was never alive to begin with. It's market share has always been in the toilet. Nobody takes it seriously as an operating system. You are quite right Linux's market share is so abysmal that billions of people actually use it daily without being aware of it. If you are going to Troll, do it properly. Re: (Score:3) by ITRambo ( 1467509 ) About 2% of desktop users use Linux. That's about 30 million, not billions. Re: What does Netcraft say? (Score:4, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 21, 2016 @01:53AM (#52741481) Android. Web servers. Routers. Switches. Billions. Reply to This Parent Share twitter facebook linkedin Flag as Inappropriate Re: What does Netcraft say? (Score:3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward Those aren't desktop users. They're not relevant to a discussion about desktop environments. You wouldn't run KDE on a switch. That would be stupid. Re: (Score:2) by tezbobobo ( 879983 ) OP has a valid point actually. The article isn't talking about the 'billion's of devices - it is specifically talking about the desktop platform. I believe that Linux constitutes between 5-10% of desktop use. Considering it is free, that's pretty crap. Re: What does Netcraft say? (Score:4, Interesting) by Zontar The Mindless ( 9002 ) <[email protected]> on Sunday August 21, 2016 @03:26AM (#52741711) Homepage Given the considerable lengths to which MS has gone over the last 20 years in its attempts to strangle any other, nascent desktop OS in the crib [wikipedia.org], I think it's pretty fucking remarkable that we even have any alternatives at all. Fuck the numbers. What matters is this: Do we still have choices? Yes? Then I really don't give a shit about how many people make choices that I don't make. Let them. I don't follow the Kardashians, either. And FWIW--long-time KDE user here. The Plasma/workspaces stuff is boneheaded but can safely be ignored. Otherwise, I'm still liking it pretty well. If that ever changes? "We'll always have Window Maker." Reply to This Parent Share twitter facebook linkedin Flag as Inappropriate Re: (Score:3, Funny) by Bing Tsher E ( 943915 ) Billions of people use processors that run only Machine Language programs that load from the reset vector. Mice, graphics card, the controller chips inside hard drives, etc. There's even a 'multiplier effect' because every Linux computer in operation has a handful of these processors inside it. So the Machine Language 'Operating System' is 20-500 times more popular than any PC operating system, and thousands to hundreds of thousands of times more popular than Linux. This popularity measure is based on the It better not be. (Score:4, Interesting) by Zombie Ryushu ( 803103 ) on Saturday August 20, 2016 @11:38PM (#52741047) KDE is the Gold standard in Linux Desktops. It has the most utilitarian behavior of all of the existing Linux desktops. Reply to This Share twitter facebook linkedin Flag as Inappropriate Re:It better not be. (Score:5, Interesting) by HiThere ( 15173 ) <charleshixsn AT earthlink DOT net> on Sunday August 21, 2016 @12:40AM (#52741257) KDE3 was the gold standard for my use. KDE4 never seemed as "solid". I preferred Gnome2. When I saw KDE5 on Ubuntu I immediately reinstalled Debian. XFCE is pretty good, so is LXDE. The last time I tried Mate I wasn't really impressed, but that's 6 months ago. Cinnamon seemed to have caught some sort of disease from Gnome3 when dealing with panels. Trinity doesn't seems to work well with the current series of applications. But currently what I use is KDE4. I like it, it's just never felt as solid as KDE3 did....but I preferred Gnome2 to KDE4, so I'm not sure why Mate hasn't felt like a reasonable choice. Reply to This Parent Share twitter facebook linkedin Flag as Inappropriate Re: (Score:2) by Blaskowicz ( 634489 ) I feel like Mate (or Gnome 2 in things like RHEL 6 and Open Solaris variants) is very susceptible to a theme or icons being slightly off. It can look crappy, or slightly like crap. Mint exists as a whole distro to provide a theme for Mate and its GTK siblings :), even there there's a tiny little bit of variation available by default and that's all. You may slightly tweak the font rendering or hide a few desktop icons etc. rather than messing too much with the themes. If you thought Ubuntu 8.04 or Debian lenn Re: (Score:2) by thsths ( 31372 ) Actually, I think KDE 1.1 was the best KDE ever. It had some quite innovative features, such as desktop level workers, and a desktop level VFS, which actually worked.
Recommended publications
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Developer Guide

    Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Developer Guide

    Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Developer Guide An introduction to application development tools in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Dave Brolley William Cohen Roland Grunberg Aldy Hernandez Karsten Hopp Jakub Jelinek Developer Guide Jeff Johnston Benjamin Kosnik Aleksander Kurtakov Chris Moller Phil Muldoon Andrew Overholt Charley Wang Kent Sebastian Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Developer Guide An introduction to application development tools in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Edition 0 Author Dave Brolley [email protected] Author William Cohen [email protected] Author Roland Grunberg [email protected] Author Aldy Hernandez [email protected] Author Karsten Hopp [email protected] Author Jakub Jelinek [email protected] Author Jeff Johnston [email protected] Author Benjamin Kosnik [email protected] Author Aleksander Kurtakov [email protected] Author Chris Moller [email protected] Author Phil Muldoon [email protected] Author Andrew Overholt [email protected] Author Charley Wang [email protected] Author Kent Sebastian [email protected] Editor Don Domingo [email protected] Editor Jacquelynn East [email protected] Copyright © 2010 Red Hat, Inc. and others. The text of and illustrations in this document are licensed by Red Hat under a Creative Commons Attribution–Share Alike 3.0 Unported license ("CC-BY-SA"). An explanation of CC-BY-SA is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/. In accordance with CC-BY-SA, if you distribute this document or an adaptation of it, you must provide the URL for the original version. Red Hat, as the licensor of this document, waives the right to enforce, and agrees not to assert, Section 4d of CC-BY-SA to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.
  • Kde-Guide-De-Developpement.Web.Pdf

    Kde-Guide-De-Developpement.Web.Pdf

    KDE Published : 2017-06-26 License : GPLv2+ 1 KDE DU POINT DE VUE D'UN DÉVELOPPEUR 1. AVEZ-VOUS BESOIN DE CE LIVRE ? 2. LA PHILOSOPHIE DE KDE 3. COMMENT OBTENIR DE L'AIDE 2 1. AVEZ-VOUS BESOIN DE CE LIVRE ? Vous devriez lire ce livre si vous voulez développer pour KDE. Nous utilisons le terme développement très largement pour couvrir tout ce qui peut conduire à un changement dans le code source, ce qui inclut : Soumettre une correction de bogue Écrire une nouvelle application optimisée par la technologie KDE Contribuer à un projet existant Ajouter de la fonctionnalité aux bibliothèques de développement de KDE Dans ce livre, nous vous livrerons les bases dont vous avez besoin pour être un développeur productif. Nous décrirons les outils que vous devrez installer, montrer comment lire la documentation (et écrire la vôtre propre, une fois que vous aurez créé la nouvelle fonctionnalité !) et comment obtenir de l'aide par d'autres moyens. Nous vous présenterons la communauté KDE, qui est essentielle pour comprendre KDE parce que nous sommes un projet « open source », libre (gratuit). Les utilisateurs finaux du logiciel n'ont PAS besoin de ce livre ! Cependant, ils pourraient le trouver intéressant pour les aider à comprendre comment les logiciels complexes et riches en fonctionnalités qu'ils utilisent ont vu le jour. 3 2. LA PHILOSOPHIE DE KDE Le succès de KDE repose sur une vue globale, que nous avons trouvée à la fois pratique et motivante. Les éléments de cette philosophie de développement comprennent : L'utilisation des outils disponibles plutôt que de ré-inventer ceux existants : beaucoup des bases dont vous avez besoin pour travailler font déjà partie de KDE, comme les bibliothèques principales ou les « Kparts », et sont tout à fait au point.
  • Metadata Track Akonadi the Independent Solution for PIM Data

    Metadata Track Akonadi the Independent Solution for PIM Data

    Akonadi – The independent solution for PIM GCDS 2009 data Metadata track Akonadi the independent solution for PIM data Will Stephenson Will Stephenson Akonadi – The independent solution for PIM GCDS 2009 data Akonadi Topics Akona-what? Design Overview What we give you What you give us Will Stephenson Akonadi – The independent solution for PIM GCDS 2009 data Akonadi The story so far Monolithic apps Own data storage Limited if any external interfaces E-D-S Data storage service Limited range of types supported Will Stephenson Akonadi – The independent solution for PIM GCDS 2009 data Why? Limitations of KDE3 KResource framework limitations: Data is not shared Designed for synchronous access Hard to extend to other data types Basically no shared common code KMail limitations: Only limited backend abstraction Designed for small amounts of local data Will Stephenson Akonadi – The independent solution for PIM GCDS 2009 data Scalability with KDE 3 |Data| = small Contact applet KAddressBook l l KMail Kopete Will Stephenson Akonadi – The independent solution for PIM GCDS 2009 data Scalability in KDE 3 |Data| = large Contact applet KAddressBook l l KMail Kopete Will Stephenson Akonadi – The independent solution for PIM GCDS 2009 data Why? Goals As much as possible shared, type independent functionality Easy to extend to new data types Unified API to access PIM data, independent of the actual data source Scalability Will Stephenson Akonadi – The independent solution for PIM GCDS 2009 data Why? Goals One synchronization point for mobile devices Reliable,
  • Kdesrc-Build Script Manual

    Kdesrc-Build Script Manual

    kdesrc-build Script Manual Michael Pyne Carlos Woelz kdesrc-build Script Manual 2 Contents 1 Introduction 8 1.1 A brief introduction to kdesrc-build . .8 1.1.1 What is kdesrc-build? . .8 1.1.2 kdesrc-build operation ‘in a nutshell’ . .8 1.2 Documentation Overview . .9 2 Getting Started 10 2.1 Preparing the System to Build KDE . 10 2.1.1 Setup a new user account . 10 2.1.2 Ensure your system is ready to build KDE software . 10 2.1.3 Setup kdesrc-build . 12 2.1.3.1 Install kdesrc-build . 12 2.1.3.2 Prepare the configuration file . 12 2.1.3.2.1 Manual setup of configuration file . 12 2.2 Setting the Configuration Data . 13 2.3 Using the kdesrc-build script . 14 2.3.1 Loading project metadata . 14 2.3.2 Previewing what will happen when kdesrc-build runs . 14 2.3.3 Resolving build failures . 15 2.4 Building specific modules . 16 2.5 Setting the Environment to Run Your KDEPlasma Desktop . 17 2.5.1 Automatically installing a login driver . 18 2.5.1.1 Adding xsession support for distributions . 18 2.5.1.2 Manually adding support for xsession . 18 2.5.2 Setting up the environment manually . 19 2.6 Module Organization and selection . 19 2.6.1 KDE Software Organization . 19 2.6.2 Selecting modules to build . 19 2.6.3 Module Sets . 20 2.6.3.1 The basic module set concept . 20 2.6.3.2 Special Support for KDE module sets .
  • Linux-Cookbook.Pdf

    Linux-Cookbook.Pdf

    LINUX COOKBOOK ™ Other Linux resources from O’Reilly Related titles Linux Device Drivers Exploring the JDS Linux Linux in a Nutshell Desktop Running Linux Learning Red Hat Enterprise Building Embedded Linux Linux and Fedora Systems Linux Pocket Guide Linux Security Cookbook Understanding the Linux Kernel Linux Books linux.oreilly.com is a complete catalog of O’Reilly’s books on Resource Center Linux and Unix and related technologies, including sample chapters and code examples. ONLamp.com is the premier site for the open source web plat- form: Linux, Apache, MySQL, and either Perl, Python, or PHP. Conferences O’Reilly brings diverse innovators together to nurture the ideas that spark revolutionary industries. We specialize in document- ing the latest tools and systems, translating the innovator’s knowledge into useful skills for those in the trenches. Visit conferences.oreilly.com for our upcoming events. Safari Bookshelf (safari.oreilly.com) is the premier online refer- ence library for programmers and IT professionals. Conduct searches across more than 1,000 books. Subscribers can zero in on answers to time-critical questions in a matter of seconds. Read the books on your Bookshelf from cover to cover or sim- ply flip to the page you need. Try it today with a free trial. LINUX COOKBOOK ™ Carla Schroder Beijing • Cambridge • Farnham • Köln • Paris • Sebastopol • Taipei • Tokyo Linux Cookbook™ by Carla Schroder Copyright © 2005 O’Reilly Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Published by O’Reilly Media, Inc., 1005 Gravenstein Highway North, Sebastopol, CA 95472. O’Reilly books may be purchased for educational, business, or sales promotional use.
  • Pipenightdreams Osgcal-Doc Mumudvb Mpg123-Alsa Tbb

    Pipenightdreams Osgcal-Doc Mumudvb Mpg123-Alsa Tbb

    pipenightdreams osgcal-doc mumudvb mpg123-alsa tbb-examples libgammu4-dbg gcc-4.1-doc snort-rules-default davical cutmp3 libevolution5.0-cil aspell-am python-gobject-doc openoffice.org-l10n-mn libc6-xen xserver-xorg trophy-data t38modem pioneers-console libnb-platform10-java libgtkglext1-ruby libboost-wave1.39-dev drgenius bfbtester libchromexvmcpro1 isdnutils-xtools ubuntuone-client openoffice.org2-math openoffice.org-l10n-lt lsb-cxx-ia32 kdeartwork-emoticons-kde4 wmpuzzle trafshow python-plplot lx-gdb link-monitor-applet libscm-dev liblog-agent-logger-perl libccrtp-doc libclass-throwable-perl kde-i18n-csb jack-jconv hamradio-menus coinor-libvol-doc msx-emulator bitbake nabi language-pack-gnome-zh libpaperg popularity-contest xracer-tools xfont-nexus opendrim-lmp-baseserver libvorbisfile-ruby liblinebreak-doc libgfcui-2.0-0c2a-dbg libblacs-mpi-dev dict-freedict-spa-eng blender-ogrexml aspell-da x11-apps openoffice.org-l10n-lv openoffice.org-l10n-nl pnmtopng libodbcinstq1 libhsqldb-java-doc libmono-addins-gui0.2-cil sg3-utils linux-backports-modules-alsa-2.6.31-19-generic yorick-yeti-gsl python-pymssql plasma-widget-cpuload mcpp gpsim-lcd cl-csv libhtml-clean-perl asterisk-dbg apt-dater-dbg libgnome-mag1-dev language-pack-gnome-yo python-crypto svn-autoreleasedeb sugar-terminal-activity mii-diag maria-doc libplexus-component-api-java-doc libhugs-hgl-bundled libchipcard-libgwenhywfar47-plugins libghc6-random-dev freefem3d ezmlm cakephp-scripts aspell-ar ara-byte not+sparc openoffice.org-l10n-nn linux-backports-modules-karmic-generic-pae
  • GNOME 1.2 Desktop COMEBACK of THE

    GNOME 1.2 Desktop COMEBACK of THE

    GNOME SOFTWARE GNOME 1.2 Desktop COMEBACK OF THE Ignored by many GNOME users and prematurely ANDREAS HUCHLER written-off by some distributions the GNOME desktop environment fights back with a new version. Here, we take a look at the most important components of Helix GNOME 1.2 to help you decide if an upgrade or new installation is worthwhile. About four years ago a group of Linux enthusiasts elements to be produced in a similar easy manner. on the Internet got together with the aim of devel- The differences were not resolved, so in the end oping a graphical user interface for Linux that would some of the developers decided to support the Qt- Helixcode stand comparison with Windows and Mac OS. based KDE project whilst the others started to cre- The American firm Helixcode, It’s true that at that time there were already sev- ate the gtk-based GNOME project. Inc. (http://www.helixcode.com) eral window managers – for example, fvwm2 and cofounded by GNOME evange- Afterstep – for the X interface; with CDE a desktop Co-operation list and author of Midnight environment was even available. However, these Commander Miguel de Icaza, solutions all had disadvantages – the window man- Over time, not least because of the subsequent has made it its goal to help agers had so session management nor support for open source licensing of Qt, the former rivalry GNOME break through as an drag and drop; CDE was commercial and obsolete – between the two projects gave way to a spirit of co- Internet desktop. In addition so there was a real need for a new graphical inter- operation.
  • The GNU General Public License and the Zero-Price-Fixing Problem

    The GNU General Public License and the Zero-Price-Fixing Problem

    Michigan Law Review Volume 104 Issue 3 2005 What's So Great about Nothing? The GNU General Public License and the Zero-Price-Fixing Problem Heidi S. Bond University of Michigan Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, and the Computer Law Commons Recommended Citation Heidi S. Bond, What's So Great about Nothing? The GNU General Public License and the Zero-Price-Fixing Problem, 104 MICH. L. REV. 547 (2005). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol104/iss3/4 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTE What's So Great about Nothing? The GNU General Public License and the Zero-Price-Fixing Problem * Heidi S. Bond TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .. ........................................ ............................. ............... 548 I. THE GPL's PRICING RESTRAINT SHOULD BE EVALUATED UNDER THE RULE OF REASON ............................. 556 A. The GP L's Pricing Restraint Is Needed to Allow the Free Exchange of Software.......................................... 558 B. Freely Exchanged Software Is a New Product Allowing Software Evolution....................... ............... ....... 560 II. A PRICE OF NOTHING ON SUBSEQUENT DISTRIBUTIONS DEMONSTRATES THAT THE GOAL Is Nor TO RESTRAIN COMPETITION .......................................................... 562 A. Broadcast Music: A Framework for Evaluating Nothing ........................................................... 562 B. Applying the Broadcast Music Framework to the GPL. .... 564 Ill.
  • Akonadi-Opensync2008.Pdf

    Akonadi-Opensync2008.Pdf

    Why rewrite the foundation of KDE PIM? KResource ● Designed 10 years ago for small amounts of data ● Synchronous access ● No code sharing ● Hard to extend ● No change notifications ● No shared data ● (Ab-)Used way beyond its capabilities Goals ● Fix all of the above ● Provide a unified API to access PIM data, independent of the actual data source ● Provide flexible cache policies for remote data ● Fast virtual folders, representing search results ● Usable for the whole free desktop Chaos Design Server ● Fully type independent ● Caches remote data ● Change notifications ● Conflict detection ● Based on MySQL ● Depends only on Qt Protocol ● Data access – Based on IMAP – Optimized for high throuput – Data encoded using standard formats ● Change notification, control methods – D-Bus – Optimized for easy use ● Platform and toolkit independent Basic Objects ● Filesystem-like structure – Collections – Items ● Items consist of – A payload, consisting of one or more parts – Arbitrary attributes Client Library ● libakonadi: Qt/KDE based – C++ – Ruby – Python – C# ● Mostly type-independent ● Type-specific plugins API ● Low-level – Job based – Asynchronous ● High-level – Qt Model/View ● Change monitoring and recording/replay Resource Agents ● Connect Akonadi to external data sources – Local files (ical, vcard, maildir,...) – Mail or groupware servers – Web services (facebook, del.ico.us, ...) ● Translate data formats ● Replay offline changes Other Agents ● Implement functionalitry not limited to a single application ● Operate autonomously on PIM data ● Examples – Indexing – Mail threading – Filtering – ... Status ● Server and client library first released with KDE 4.1 ● First users: Mailody, KPilot ● Supported types: – Mail – Contacts – Calendar – RSS feeds – Bookmarks Roadmap for KDE 4.2 ● Use Akonadi for contacts and calendar data for all of KDE PIM ● Limit porting work by using KResource <-> Akonadi bridges – Allows to use KResource based backends with Akonadi – Transparent for old applications .
  • 1.1 X Client/Server

    1.1 X Client/Server

    เดสกทอปลินุกซ เทพพิทักษ การุญบุญญานันท 2 สารบัญ 1 ระบบ X Window 5 1.1 ระบบ X Client/Server . 5 1.2 Window Manager . 6 1.3 Desktop Environment . 7 2 การปรับแตง GNOME 11 2.1 การติดตั้งฟอนต . 11 2.2 GConf . 12 2.3 การแสดงตัวอักษร . 13 2.4 พื้นหลัง . 15 2.5 Theme . 16 2.6 เมนู/ทูลบาร . 17 2.7 แปนพิมพ . 18 2.8 เมาส . 20 3 4 บทที่ 1 ระบบ X Window ระบบ GUI ที่อยูคูกับยูนิกซมมานานคือระบบ X Window ซึ่งพัฒนาโดยโครงการ Athena ที่ MIT รวมกับบริษัท Digital Equipment Corporation และบริษัทเอกชนจำนวนหนึ่ง ปจจุบัน X Window ดูแลโดย Open Group เปนระบบที่เปดทั้งในเรื่องโปรโตคอลและซอรสโคด ขณะที่เขียนเอกสารฉบับนี้ เวอรชันลาสุดของ X Window คือ เวอรชัน 11 รีลีส 6.6 (เรียกสั้นๆ วา X11R6.6) สำหรับลินุกซและระบบปฏิบัติการในตระกูลยูนิกซที่ทำงานบน PC ระบบ X Window ที่ใชจะมาจาก โครงการ XFree86 ซึ่งพัฒนาไดรเวอรสำหรับอุปกรณกราฟกตางๆ ที่ใชกับเครื่อง PC รุนลาสุดขณะที่ เขียนเอกสารนี้คือ 4.3.0 1.1 ระบบ X Client/Server X Window เปนระบบที่ทำงานผานระบบเครือขาย โดยแยกเปนสวน X client และ X server สื่อสาร กันผาน X protocol ดังนั้น โปรแกรมที่ทำงานบน X Window จะสามารถแสดงผลบนระบบปฏิบัติการ ที่ตางชนิดกันก็ได ตราบใดที่ระบบนั้นสามารถใหบริการผาน X protocol ได X client ไดแกโปรแกรมประยุกตตางๆ ที่จะขอใชบริการจาก X server ในการติดตอกับฮารดแวร เชน จอภาพ แปนพิมพ เมาส ฯลฯ ดังนั้น X server จึงทำงานอยูบนเครื่องที่อยูใกลผูใชเสมอ ในขณะที่ X client อาจอยูในเครื่องเดียวกันหรืออยูในเครื่องใดเครื่องหนึ่งในระบบเครือขายก็ได X client จะติดตอกับ X server ดวยการเรียก X library (เรียกสั้นๆ วา Xlib) API ตางๆ ใน Xlib มีหนาที่แปลงการเรียกฟงกชันแตละครั้งใหเปน request ในรูปของ X protocol เพื่อสงไปยัง X server
  • KDE E.V. Quarterly Report 2008Q1/Q2

    KDE E.V. Quarterly Report 2008Q1/Q2

    KDE e.V. Quarterly Report Q1/2008 & Q2/2008 .init() home for KDE e.V. to call its own but a tremendous asset in Claudia who Dear KDE e.V. member, has rapidly made herself at home in our community providing much needed logistical support and business The first two quarters of 2008 were very busy ones for development effort while diving head-first into the KDE participants. Both the technology project and KDE e.V. community by joining our events and tradeshow teams. We were bustling with activity. are happy to welcome Claudia into our community and our team. The obvious stand-out moment was when KDE 4.0 was released at an immensely successful release event held in In short, the first half of 2008 was busy and full of pleasant Mountain View, California - where Google served as our surprises and achievements. KDE e.V. found ways to be hosts and numerous locations around the world tuned in more efficient and increase our pace to keep up with the to join us live over the Internet. Besides creating new technology project's own escalation. Looking forward to community bonds and bringing together developers from the second half of the year with Akademy 2008 just around various projects and companies in and outside of the KDE the corner, it's safe to say that things aren't about to slow project, it also spawned what will be an annual KDE down, either. Americas event at the beginning of each year. To our membership and partners: thank you for helping Work to ensure Akademy 2008 went off successfully was making the start of 2008 such a positive and productive also in high gear as KDE 4.1 was being readied for release.
  • Akonadi – Pimpin' Your PIM Till Adam / Volker Krause Akonadi – Pimpin' Your PIM Foss.In 2007 Akonadi

    Akonadi – Pimpin' Your PIM Till Adam / Volker Krause Akonadi – Pimpin' Your PIM Foss.In 2007 Akonadi

    Akonadi – Pimpin' your PIM Till Adam / Volker Krause Akonadi – Pimpin' your PIM foss.in 2007 Akonadi Topics ● Akona-what? ● Design Overview ● What we give you ● What you give us Till Adam / Volker Krause Akonadi – Pimpin' your PIM foss.in 2007 Akonadi A bit of history Till Adam / Volker Krause Akonadi – Pimpin' your PIM foss.in 2007 Why? Limitations of KDE3 ● KResource framework limitations: ● Data is not shared ● Designed for synchronous access ● Hard to extend to other data types ● Basically no shared common code ● KMail limitations: ● Only limited backend abstraction ➔ Designed for small amounts of local data Till Adam / Volker Krause Akonadi – Pimpin' your PIM foss.in 2007 Why? Goals ● As much as possible shared, type independent functionality ● Easy to extend to new data types ● Unified API to access PIM data, independent of the actual data source ● Scalability Till Adam / Volker Krause Akonadi – Pimpin' your PIM foss.in 2007 Why? Goals ● One synchronization point for mobile devices ● Reliable, desktop wide notification ● Clean model/view separation (UI-less data access) ● Easy to write access libraries for ➔ Usable for the whole free desktop Till Adam / Volker Krause Akonadi – Pimpin' your PIM foss.in 2007 Why? Enabling new use cases “show me the log of the last IRC chat I had with the person who send me this mail” Till Adam / Volker Krause Akonadi – Pimpin' your PIM foss.in 2007 Why? Enabling new use cases “show me all mails with pdf attachments mentioning my hamster 'cookie' right here inside my IM client, whenever someone mentions chicken curry” Till Adam / Volker Krause Akonadi – Pimpin' your PIM foss.in 2007 Why? Enabling new use cases “tell me when I get new mail in this folder and this other folder, and show it on the desktop, but only if it's not from my mom.