Security Clearance Reform: the Performance Accountability Council’S Path Forward

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Security Clearance Reform: the Performance Accountability Council’S Path Forward SECURITY CLEARANCE REFORM: THE PERFORMANCE ACCOUNTABILITY COUNCIL’S PATH FORWARD HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION FEBRUARY 25, 2016 Serial No. 114–105 Printed for the use of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov http://www.house.gov/reform U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 23–404 PDF WASHINGTON : 2017 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 14:15 Feb 15, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 H:\23404.TXT APRIL KING-6430 with DISTILLER COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM JASON CHAFFETZ, Utah, Chairman JOHN L. MICA, Florida ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland, Ranking MICHAEL R. TURNER, Ohio Minority Member JOHN J. DUNCAN, JR., Tennessee CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York JIM JORDAN, Ohio ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, District of TIM WALBERG, Michigan Columbia JUSTIN AMASH, Michigan WM. LACY CLAY, Missouri PAUL A. GOSAR, Arizona STEPHEN F. LYNCH, Massachusetts SCOTT DESJARLAIS, Tennessee JIM COOPER, Tennessee TREY GOWDY, South Carolina GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia BLAKE FARENTHOLD, Texas MATT CARTWRIGHT, Pennsylvania CYNTHIA M. LUMMIS, Wyoming TAMMY DUCKWORTH, Illinois THOMAS MASSIE, Kentucky ROBIN L. KELLY, Illinois MARK MEADOWS, North Carolina BRENDA L. LAWRENCE, Michigan RON DESANTIS, Florida TED LIEU, California MICK MULVANEY, South Carolina BONNIE WATSON COLEMAN, New Jersey KEN BUCK, Colorado STACEY E. PLASKETT, Virgin Islands MARK WALKER, North Carolina MARK DESAULNIER, California ROD BLUM, Iowa BRENDAN F. BOYLE, Pennsylvania JODY B. HICE, Georgia PETER WELCH, Vermont STEVE RUSSELL, Oklahoma MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM, New Mexico EARL L. ‘‘BUDDY’’ CARTER, Georgia GLENN GROTHMAN, Wisconsin WILL HURD, Texas GARY J. PALMER, Alabama JENNIFER HEMINGWAY, Staff Director DAVID RAPALLO, Minority Staff Director JACK THORLIN, Counsel WILLIAM MARX, Clerk (II) VerDate Nov 24 2008 14:15 Feb 15, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 H:\23404.TXT APRIL KING-6430 with DISTILLER C O N T E N T S Page Hearing held on February 25, 2016 ....................................................................... 1 WITNESSES Ms. Beth Cobert, Acting Direcor, U.S. Office of Personnel Management Oral Statement ................................................................................................. 7 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 9 Mr. Terry Halvorsen, Chief Information Officer, U.S. Department of Defense Oral Statement ................................................................................................. 13 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 15 Mr. Tony Scott, Deputy Director for Management, U.S. Office of Management and Budget Oral Statement ................................................................................................. 18 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 20 Mr. William Evanina, Director of National Counterintelligence and Security Center, Office of the Director of National Intelligence Oral Statement ................................................................................................. 24 Written Statement ............................................................................................ 26 APPENDIX Chairman Chaffetz Opening Statement ................................................................ 60 Press Release from Senator David Vitter, submitted by Ranking Member Elijah E. Cummings ............................................................................................. 65 Responses to questions for the record from Terry Halvorsen, Chief Informa- tion Officer at the U.S. Department of Defense, submitted by Chairman Chaffetz ................................................................................................................. 66 Responses to questions for the record and relevant attachments (#1–4) from Beth Cobert, Acting Director, U.S. Office of Personnel Manaement, sub- mitted by Chairman Chaffetz ............................................................................. 73 Responses to questions for the record from William Evanina, Director of National Counterintelligence and Security Center, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, submitted by Chairman Chaffetz .............................. 89 Responses to questions for the record from Tony Scott, U.S. Chief Information Officer, U.S. Office of Management and Budget, submitted by Chairman Chaffetz ................................................................................................................. 97 (III) VerDate Nov 24 2008 14:15 Feb 15, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 H:\23404.TXT APRIL KING-6430 with DISTILLER VerDate Nov 24 2008 14:15 Feb 15, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 H:\23404.TXT APRIL KING-6430 with DISTILLER SECURITY CLEARANCE REFORM: THE PERFORMANCE ACCOUNTABILITY COUNCIL’S PATH FORWARD Thursday, February 25, 2016 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM, WASHINGTON, D.C. The committee met, pursuant to call, at 9:59 a.m., in Room 2154, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Jason Chaffetz [chairman of the committee] presiding. Present: Representatives Chaffetz, Mica, Duncan, Jordan, Walberg, Amash, DesJarlais, Massie, Meadows, Buck, Walker, Blum, Hice, Russell, Carter, Hurd, Palmer, Cummings, Maloney, Norton, Lynch, Connolly, Duckworth, Lawrence, Lieu, Plaskett, DeSaulnier, and Welch. Chairman CHAFFETZ. Without objection, the chair is authorized to declare a recess at any time. I appreciate you all being here for this hearing, ‘‘Security Clear- ance Reform: The Performance Accountability Council’s Path For- ward.’’ At last count, the Director of National Intelligence reported 4.5 million people held security clearances, 4.5 million, and the queue for clearances continues to grow. At the end of fiscal year 2015, there were more than 388,000 new background investigations, and 117,000 periodic reinvestigations backlogged at the Office of Per- sonnel Management. That is a lot of folks with access or requesting access to our most sensitive national security information. And we have learned last year that most if not all the personal information collected during background investigations was exfiltrated in one of our country’s biggest cyber attacks. We have to be careful not to ever, ever allow that to happen again. We have to fix the process, and we have to protect the information we col- lect. And as part of my opening statement, I would actually like to yield some time to the gentleman from Oklahoma, who has been very keenly involved in this, Mr. Russell. Mr. RUSSELL. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And I do appreciate the panel also being here today. Following the June 2015 OPM data breach, I began working with my good friend and colleague Congressman Ted Lieu on a path for- ward that would protect not just the personal and private informa- tion of those who hold security clearances but what amounts to crown jewels for any foreign intelligence service. (1) VerDate Nov 24 2008 14:15 Feb 15, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 H:\23404.TXT APRIL KING-6430 with DISTILLER 2 My concern deepened as we learned the full extent of the breach. All told, 18 million records were stolen in the breach, including data on military and intelligence personnel, placing Americans at great risk that has not abated. I also received a letter from my time in the service being a former top secret SCI clearance holder in the military stating that my data had been compromised. For me and my friend Congress- man Ted Lieu, who also received a letter, this is not some academic issue. It should also be noted that the DOD never lost security of such data when it was under their care. It was through pressure, largely from Congress, to save money, make an effort to eliminate a large backlog. Well, we eliminated the backlog by eliminating security. Whatever savings we had has surely been forfeited in that result. Today, we will examine the reform efforts advanced by the 90- day sustainability and security review by the Performance Account- ability Council, or PAC. One of the main points of emphasis I made along with Mr. Lieu was the need for the Department of Defense to own the data for our service members and Department civilians. And I am encouraged that the PAC review will result in this being accomplished. Under the reforms recommended by the PAC, the Department of Defense will be responsible for not just building the infrastructure that will house this critically important data; they will also be re- sponsible for defending it. The questions remain, however, that while the DOD has been given the responsibility, will they be given the authority while being placed under a bureau that is placed under a department? This has to be answered. I remain concerned regarding the creation of the new National Background Investigations Bureau, or NBIB. NBIB will ultimately absorb the Federal Investigative Service, which currently is tasked with conducting background investigations for the vast majority of our government.
Recommended publications
  • Prism Vol. 9, No. 2 Prism About Vol
    2 021 PRISMVOL. 9, NO. 2 | 2021 PRISM VOL. 9, NO. 2 NO. 9, VOL. THE JOURNAL OF COMPLEX OPER ATIONS PRISM ABOUT VOL. 9, NO. 2, 2021 PRISM, the quarterly journal of complex operations published at National Defense University (NDU), aims to illuminate and provoke debate on whole-of-government EDITOR IN CHIEF efforts to conduct reconstruction, stabilization, counterinsurgency, and irregular Mr. Michael Miklaucic warfare operations. Since the inaugural issue of PRISM in 2010, our readership has expanded to include more than 10,000 officials, servicemen and women, and practi- tioners from across the diplomatic, defense, and development communities in more COPYEDITOR than 80 countries. Ms. Andrea L. Connell PRISM is published with support from NDU’s Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS). In 1984, Secretary of Defense Casper Weinberger established INSS EDITORIAL ASSISTANTS within NDU as a focal point for analysis of critical national security policy and Ms. Taylor Buck defense strategy issues. Today INSS conducts research in support of academic and Ms. Amanda Dawkins leadership programs at NDU; provides strategic support to the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, combatant commands, and armed services; Ms. Alexandra Fabre de la Grange and engages with the broader national and international security communities. Ms. Julia Humphrey COMMUNICATIONS INTERNET PUBLICATIONS PRISM welcomes unsolicited manuscripts from policymakers, practitioners, and EDITOR scholars, particularly those that present emerging thought, best practices, or train- Ms. Joanna E. Seich ing and education innovations. Publication threshold for articles and critiques varies but is largely determined by topical relevance, continuing education for national and DESIGN international security professionals, scholarly standards of argumentation, quality of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Defending 2020
    © 2021 The Alliance for Securing Democracy Please direct inquiries to The Alliance for Securing Democracy at The German Marshall Fund of the United States 1700 18th Street, NW Washington, DC 20009 T 1 202 683 2650 E [email protected] This publication can be downloaded for free at https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/defending-2020/. The views expressed in GMF publications and commentary are the views of the authors alone. Cover design by Katya Sankow Alliance for Securing Democracy The Alliance for Securing Democracy (ASD), a nonpartisan initiative housed at the German Marshall Fund of the United States, develops comprehensive strategies to deter, defend against, and raise the costs on autocratic efforts to undermine and interfere in democratic institutions. ASD has staff in Washington, D.C., and Brussels, bringing together experts on disinformation, malign finance, emerging technologies, elections integrity, economic coer- cion, and cybersecurity, as well as Russia, China, and the Middle East, to collaborate across traditional stovepipes and develop cross-cutting frameworks. About the Authors Jessica Brandt is head of policy and research for the Alliance for Securing Democracy and a fellow at the Ger- man Marshall Fund of the United States. She was previously a fellow in the Foreign Policy program at the Brook- ings Institution, where her research focused on multilateral institutions and geopolitics, and where she led a cross-program initiative on Democracy at Risk. Jessica previously served as special adviser to the president of the Brookings Institution, as an International and Global Affairs fellow at the Belfer Center for Science and Inter- national Affairs at Harvard University, and as the director of Foreign Relations for the Geneva Accord.
    [Show full text]
  • Jussie Smollett Interview with Robin Williams Transcript
    Jussie Smollett Interview With Robin Williams Transcript Is Waleed numeric when Fidel defecating thrillingly? Sometimes Papuan Adolphus plasticising her mystics tegularly, but undivulged Emmott bamboozling honestly or delaminates interchangeably. Mose never ignited any tenesmus ballyragged slyly, is Ram riotous and snorty enough? Marc Chandler on the leak for stocks. President trump from its shift to interview about steel ceo gerald on financial services spokesperson for williams, jussie smollett interview with robin williams transcript. House speaker rejects request from lockheed martin has had a transcript; interview question this interview dani has taken steps president andy biggs, jussie smollett interview with robin williams transcript here is a weekly newsletter. China trade agreements market and compiles their lives in on whether we are tonight in this? Congressional investigation into some point at imposing tariffs hitting retailers ceo gary cohn, jussie smollett interview with robin williams transcript bulletin publishing co mingle crap on film festival. At a transcript bulletin warning issued a knight is associating with jussie smollett interview with robin williams transcript was. The foremost trial ended in every hung jury, but as time things are different. China devaluing their purchase basic christian ethics complaint against two is set. Deputy director of feva, rep at penn on mounting concerns does? Zoë got outdated and complained, even split she was getting hurt too. And managing partner carrie lam killing him saturday night leaving them to them on wednesday, with other people who shoot this country today we know this? Why is we wanted to deliver his contributions to fix the business casual, smollett with jussie robin williams.
    [Show full text]
  • Margaret K. Lewis* the Department of Justice Launched the China
    LEWIS 8/25/20 12:12 PM CRIMINALIZING CHINA Margaret K. Lewis* 111 J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY __ (Forthcoming December 2020) Draft: August 25, 2020 The Department of Justice launched the China Initiative in November 2018 to counter national security threats emanating from the People’s Republic of China (PRC). By June 2020, the Federal Bureau of Investigation had approximately two thousand active investigations under the Initiative. People and entities with connections to the PRC’s governing party-state structure have engaged in trade secret theft and other crimes under U.S. law. The Department of Justice is not making up a threat. It is, however, framing that threat in a problematic way. This Article argues that using “China” as the glue connecting cases prosecuted under the Initiative’s umbrella creates an overinclusive conception of the threat and attaches a criminal taint to entities that possess “China-ness” even if they do not have a nexus to the PRC party-state. The Article further contends that, when assessed in light of the goals of deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and retribution, it is worrisome that the prosecution and punishment of people and entities rests in part on a connection with “China.” A better path is to discard the “China Initiative” framing, focus on cases’ individual characteristics, and enhance the Department of Justice’s interactions with non-governmental experts. * Professor of Law, Seton Hall University School of Law. Thank you to Lauren Russo, Patrick Dwyer, and Richard Connors for their excellent research assistance. This article has benefited greatly from the comments of Ira Belkin, Donald Clarke, Jerome Cohen, Mark Cohen, Nelson Dong, Brian Murray, and participants in the NYU School of Law, U.S.-Asia Law Institute workshop and Seton Hall Law faculty scholarship workshop.
    [Show full text]
  • Ip Commission Report
    UPDATE to the ip commission report THE THEFT OF AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: REASSESSMENTS OF THE CHALLENGE AND UNITED STATES POLICY 2017 UPDATE to the ip commission report THE THEFT OF AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: REASSESSMENTS OF THE CHALLENGE AND UNITED STATES POLICY This report was published on behalf of The Commission on the Theft of American Intellectual Property by The National Bureau of Asian Research. The Report of the Commission on the Theft of American Intellectual Property(also known as the IP Commission Report) was published in May 2013. This update was published in February 2017. © 2017 by The National Bureau of Asian Research. UPDATE to the ip commission report TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments v Dennis C. Blair and Jon M. Huntsman, Jr. Executive Summary 1 Introduction 4 New Developments to Counter IP Theft 4 State of the Problem: Damage Report 7 The Intellectual Property Rights Climate Abroad 13 Conclusion 16 Appendix: Examination of Recommendations 17 Adopted Recommendations Recommendations Pending Action 20 About the Commissioners 24 List of Common Abbreviations ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Over three years ago we co-chaired a report by the Commission on the Theft of American Intellectual Property. The report outlined the enormous magnitude of the problem and presented a series of recommended actions to stem the loss of the lifeblood of American entrepreneurship. The original report received, and continues to receive, widespread public attention. Congress adopted several Commission recommendations to provide the executive branch and private industry with unprecedented, powerful tools with which to fight intellectual property (IP) theft. The executive branch took a limited number of actions, while American businesses have continued to confine their actions to defensive measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunter Biden, Burisma, and Corruption: the Impact on U.S
    Hunter Biden, Burisma, and Corruption: The Impact on U.S. Government Policy and Related Concerns U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs U.S. Senate Committee on Finance Majority Staff Report TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY II. INTRODUCTION III. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST IV. THE VICE PRESIDENT’S OFFICE AND STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS WERE AWARE OF BUT IGNORED CONCERNS RELATING TO HUNTER BIDEN’S ROLE ON BURISMA’S BOARD. V. SECRETARY OF STATE JOHN KERRY FALSELY CLAIMED HE HAD NO KNOWLEDGE ABOUT HUNTER BIDEN’S ROLE ON BURISMA’S BOARD. VI. STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS VIEWED MYKOLA ZLOCHEVSKY AS A CORRUPT, “ODIOUS OLIGARCH,” BUT VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN WAS ADVISED NOT TO ACCUSE ZLOCHEVSKY OF CORRUPTION. VII. WHILE HUNTER BIDEN SERVED ON BURISMA’S BOARD, BURISMA’S OWNER, ZLOCHEVSKY, ALLEGEDLY PAID A $7 MILLION BRIBE TO UKRAINE’S PROSECUTOR GENERAL’S OFFICE TO CLOSE THE CASE. VIII. HUNTER BIDEN: A SECRET SERVICE PROTECTEE WHILE ON BURISMA’S BOARD. IX. OBAMA ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS AND A DEMOCRAT LOBBYING FIRM HAD CONSISTENT AND SIGNIFICANT CONTACT WITH FORMER UKRAINIAN OFFICIAL ANDRII TELIZHENKO. X. THE MINORITY FALSELY ACCUSED THE CHAIRMEN OF ENGAGING IN A RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN AND USED OTHER TACTICS TO INTERFERE IN THE INVESTIGATION. XI. HUNTER BIDEN’S AND HIS FAMILY’S FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS WITH UKRAINIAN, RUSSIAN, KAZAKH AND CHINESE NATIONALS RAISE CRIMINAL CONCERNS AND EXTORTION THREATS. XII. CONCLUSION 2 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In late 2013 and into 2014, mass protests erupted in Kyiv, Ukraine, demanding integration into western economies and an end to systemic corruption that had plagued the country. At least 82 people were killed during the protests, which culminated on Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • Forum Contacts
    FORUM CONTACTS NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE MISSION INTEGRATION DIRECTORATE USER ENGAGEMENT OFFICE COL John Haynicz, U.S. Army Director, User Engagement Office Col Dean Zezeus, U.S. Air Force Deputy Director, User Engagement Office Mr. Lawrence Pace Chief of Staff, User Engagement Office Ms. Kim Sievers Director, National Programs Group/User Engagement Office LAW ENFORCEMENT - HOMELAND SECURITY FORUM COORDINATION TEAM Kevin Lewis Frank Toomer Law Enforcement Coordination Team Senior Federal Civil Coordinator [email protected] | 703.808.2125 [email protected] | 703.808.2328 Phil Donegan LT Joseph Ferdinando, USCG Law Enforcement Coordination Team U.S. Coast Guard Liaison @ NRO [email protected] | 703.808.3222 Law Enforcement-Homeland Security Team [email protected] | 703.808.1321 Boggi Chomicki Homeland Security Coordination Team Frederick Thomas Martin [email protected] | 703.808.2193 Executive Director, ICAHST [email protected] | 410.960.5432 SECURING THE HOMELAND THROUGH TECHNOLOGY, INTELLIGENCE SHARING, & COLLABORATION & SHARING, INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY, THROUGH HOMELAND THE SECURING SECURING THE HOMELAND THROUGH TECHNOLOGY, INTELLIGENCE SHARING, & COLLABORATION WELCOME LETTER SECURING THE HOMELAND THROUGH TECHNOLOGY, INTELLIGENCE SHARING, & COLLABORATION & SHARING, INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY, THROUGH HOMELAND THE SECURING SECURING THE HOMELAND THROUGH TECHNOLOGY, INTELLIGENCE SHARING, & COLLABORATION 1 GENERAL INFORMATION FORUM BADGE TECHNOLOGY EXPOSITION For security reasons, please wear your forum badge at all times. The Exhibit Hall is located directly across from the auditorium You will not be permitted to enter sessions without it. in the atrium and breakout rooms. Companies will feature innovative products, solutions, and government offerings. NOTES Time has been allotted throughout the forum to visit the exhibits. Any classified notes taken during forum sessions will not be Exhibit Hall Hours: permitted to leave the auditorium.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Calendar No. 720
    1 Union Calendar No. 720 114TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 114–909 ACTIVITIES OF THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS JANUARY 3, 2017 (Pursuant to House Rule XI, 1(d)(1)) Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov http://www.house.gov/reform JANUARY 3, 2017.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 23–223 WASHINGTON : 2017 VerDate Sep 11 2014 01:53 Jan 20, 2017 Jkt 023223 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HR909.XXX HR909 smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with REPORTS-HSE E:\Seals\Congress.#13 COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM JASON CHAFFETZ, Utah, Chairman JOHN L. MICA, Florida ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland MICHAEL R. TURNER, Ohio CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York JOHN J. DUNCAN, Jr., Tennessee ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, District of JIM JORDAN, Ohio Columbia TIM WALBERG, Michigan WM. LACY CLAY, Missouri JUSTIN AMASH, Michigan STEPHEN F. LYNCH, Massachusetts PAUL A. GOSAR, Arizona JIM COOPER, Tennessee SCOTT DESJARLAIS, Tennessee GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia TREY GOWDY, South Carolina TAMMY DUCKWORTH, Illinois BLAKE FARENTHOLD, Texas ROBIN L. KELLY, Illinois CYNTHIA M. LUMMIS, Wyoming BRENDA L. LAWRENCE, Michigan THOMAS MASSIE, Kentucky TED LIEU, California MARK MEADOWS, North Carolina BONNIE WATSON COLEMAN, New Jersey RON DESANTIS, Florida STACEY E. PLASKETT, Virgin Islands MICK MULVANEY, South Carolina MARK DESAULNIER, California KEN BUCK, Colorado BRENDAN F. BOYLE, Pennsylvania MARK WALKER, North Carolina PETER WELCH, Vermont ROD BLUM, Iowa MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM, New Mexico JODY B.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Power Politics: the United States' War on Disinformation with Consideration to Russian and Chinese Offensive Efforts
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2021 Great Power Politics: The United States’ War on Disinformation with Consideration to Russian and Chinese Offensive Efforts Jordan Venglass Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses Part of the International and Area Studies Commons Recommended Citation Venglass, Jordan, "Great Power Politics: The United States’ War on Disinformation with Consideration to Russian and Chinese Offensive Efforts" (2021). CMC Senior Theses. 2575. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/2575 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Claremont McKenna College Great Power Politics: The United States’ War on Disinformation with Consideration to Russian and Chinese Offensive Efforts submitted to Professor Hilary Appel by Jordan J. Venglass for Senior Thesis Fall 2020 November 30th, 2020 Abstract The purpose of this thesis is to examine the growing national security threat posed by Russia and China’s willingness to exercise 21st century information warfare techniques against the United States and its areas of strategic interest. This study will describe the composition of these state’s foreign disinformation entities while providing several case studies that display their advanced capabilities and the direct effects that each poses on the general public both domestically and internationally. To best provide unbiased reporting and accuracy in each country’s analysis, this study will rely on the diversified use of government reports, legal documents, academic journals, and news articles. After research into each state, this study will conclude with several recommendations for President-elect Joe Biden and his administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitigating Foreign Social Media Influence Campaigns in U.S. Elections
    Mitigating Foreign Social Media Influence Campaigns in U.S. Elections by Daniel Wade Provaznik II B.S. Systems Engineering United States Military Academy at West Point, 2018 SUBMITTED TO THE INSTITUTE FOR DATA, SYSTEMS, AND SOCIETY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Science in Technology and Policy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September 2020 © 2020 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Signature of Author: ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Institute for Data, Systems, and Society August 17, 2020 Certified by: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. Joel F. Brenner Senior Research Fellow, MIT Center for International Studies Thesis Co-Supervisor Certified by: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. Cagri K. Dagli Technical Staff, MIT Lincoln Laboratory Thesis Co-Supervisor Accepted by: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. Noelle E. Selin Director, Technology and Policy Program Associate Professor, Institute for Data, Systems, and Society and Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Science 2 Mitigating Foreign Social Media Influence Campaigns in U.S. Elections by Daniel Wade Provaznik II B.S. Systems Engineering United States Military Academy at West Point, 2018 SUBMITTED TO THE INSTITUTE FOR DATA, SYSTEMS, AND SOCIETY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN TECHNOLOGY AND POLICY AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Abstract The 2016 U.S. presidential campaign was rife with scandal, the greatest of which the Department of Justice exposed in detail in a 2018 indictment that charged a shadowy Russian organization known as the Internet Research Agency (IRA) with organizing thousands of fictitious individuals and organizations across virtually every social media platform to manipulate the beliefs of real American voters. The goal of this manipulation was to elect then-candidate Donald J.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunter Biden, Burisma, and Corruption: the Impact on U.S. Government Policy and Related Concerns
    Hunter Biden, Burisma, and Corruption: The Impact on U.S. Government Policy and Related Concerns U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs U.S. Senate Committee on Finance Majority Staff Report TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVESUMMARY II. INTRODUCTION III. CONFLICTSOF INTEREST IV. THE VICE PRESIDENT’SOFFICEAND STATEDEPARTMENTOFFICIALSWERE AWAREOFBUT IGNOREDCONCERNSRELATINGTOHUNTERBIDEN’SROLE ONBURISMA’SBOARD. V. SECRETARY OF STATE JOHN KERRY FALSELY CLAIMEDHE HADNO KNOWLEDGE ABOUT HUNTER BIDEN’S ROLE ON BURISMA’S BOARD. VI. STATE DEPARTMENTOFFICIALSVIEWED MYKOLAZLOCHEVSKY AS A CORRUPT,“ODIOUS OLIGARCH,”BUT VICE PRESIDENTBIDENWAS ADVISED NOT TO ACCUSE ZLOCHEVSKY OF CORRUPTION. VII. WHILE HUNTERBIDENSERVEDON BURISMA’SBOARD,BURISMA’S OWNER,ZLOCHEVSKY,ALLEGEDLYPAIDA $7 MILLIONBRIBETO UKRAINE’SPROSECUTORGENERAL’SOFFICE TO CLOSE THE CASE. VIII. HUNTER BIDEN: A SECRET SERVICE PROTECTEE WHILE ON BURISMA’S BOARD. IX. OBAMA ADMINISTRATIONOFFICIALSAND A DEMOCRATLOBBYINGFIRM HAD CONSISTENT ANDSIGNIFICANT CONTACT WITH FORMERUKRAINIAN OFFICIAL ANDRII TELIZHENKO. X. THE MINORITYFALSELY ACCUSED THE CHAIRMENOF ENGAGINGINA RUSSIANDISINFORMATIONCAMPAIGNAND USED OTHER TACTICS TO INTERFERE INTHE INVESTIGATION. XI. HUNTERBIDEN’SAND HISFAMILY’SFINANCIALTRANSACTIONSWITH UKRAINIAN,RUSSIAN,KAZAKHAND CHINESENATIONALSRAISE CRIMINALCONCERNSANDEXTORTIONTHREATS. XII. CONCLUSION 2 I. EXECUTIVESUMMARY Inlate 2013 and into 2014,massprotestseruptedin Kyiv,Ukraine,demanding integrationintowesterneconomiesand an end to systemic corruptionthat had plaguedthe
    [Show full text]