DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix S7. the Maximum Likelihood Majority-Rule Consensus from The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix S7. the Maximum Likelihood Majority-Rule Consensus from The Idesia 54 Poliothyrsis 17 27Flacourtia Populus 28 Hamamelis 58 Soltis et al—American Journal of Botany 24Salix 26 Dovyalis Abatia 1547 Prockia 41 Scyphostegia Casearia 68 98(4):704-730. 2011. – Data Supplement S7 – page Lunania Hymenanthera 58 Viola 1 43 84Leonia Hybanthus 24 Albizia 8 Rinorea 11 1 Malesherbia 35 Passiora 50 86 Paropsia Turnera 0 Podostemum 100 Marathrum 66 Soltis, Douglas E., Stephen A. Smith, Nico 37 Hypericum 38 Cratoxylum Vismia 46 Mesua 97 Calophyllum 0 22 60 Archytaea Garcinia 9 99 Cellinese, Kenneth J. Wurdack, David C. Tank, Clusia Elaeagnus Rhizophora 98 Bruguiera 93 0 Carallia Acridocarpus 21 Thryallis Samuel F. Brockington, Nancy F. Refulio- 24 52Dicella 96 Malpighia Byrsonima 29 Elatine 91 Bergia 0 0 Centroplacus Rodriguez, Jay B. Walker, Michael J. Moore, 4 Erythroxylum 2 Microdesmis Austrobuxus 81 Micrantheum 77 32Petalostigma 87Tetracoccus 0 Barbara S. Carlsward, Charles D. Bell, Maribeth 56 Androstachys Podocalyx Lophopyxis 50 Drypetes 13 Goupia 0 Panda 58 Galearia Latvis, Sunny Crawley, Chelsea Black, Diaga 010 Croton Pera Halophytum 59 Opuntia 63 70Portulaca Basella Diouf, Zhenxiang Xi, Catherine A. Rushworth, 36 Talinum 7256 Claytonia Pereskia Mirabilis 5 100 Delosperma 49 Rivina 54 Matthew A. Gitzendanner, Kenneth J. Sytsma, 4 Bougainvillea 31 Limeum 35 Phytolacca 12 Asteropeia 10 Rhabdodendron Mollugo Ancistrocladus Yin-Long Qiu, Khidir W. Hilu, Charles C. Davis, 78 Triphyophyllum 22 0 6 37 Nepenthes Drosophyllum 37 Limonium 96 Plumbago 95 Polygonum 24 36 Michael J. Sanderson, Reed S. Beaman, Richard G. Drosera 32 Frankenia 100 Tamarix Spinacia 69 Celosia 57 1 79 Stellaria Olmstead, Walter S. Judd, Michael J. Donoghue, 14 Phaulothamnus Simmondsia Hibbertia 71 100 Tetracera 0 2 Dillenia Hydnocarpus Qualea and Pamela S. Soltis. Angiosperm phylogeny: 17 27 Medusagyne 7 Quiina 11 Ochna 62 Cespedesia 0 67 Sauvagesia Durandea 92 genes, 640 taxa. American Journal of Botany 98(4): Hugonia 59 Reinwardtia 88 13 Linum 0 Irvingia 1 72 Klainedoxa Caryocar Vantanea 704-730. 34 Sacoglottis 51 Humiria 5 Ctenolophon 39 Ochthocosmus 0 10 Paradrypetes Kiggelaria 85 97 Acharia 4 Pangium 5 Bhesa 0 Lasiocroton 0 Dalechampia 0 Ricinus 0 Spathiostemon 0 Homalanthus Appendix S7. The maximum likelihood Conceveiba Lachnostylis 60 Croizatia 0 24 6 Heywoodia 3 Phyllanthus 0 0 Bischoa Euphorbia majority-rule consensus from the 18S rDNA 0Manihot 22 Suregada 0 Tetrorchidium Trigonostemon 0 18 Codiaeum Lepidobotrys 100 0 16 Ruptiliocarpon analysis shown as a phylogram. Numbers 7 Pimelodendron 2 Omphalea Hura 0 0 Clutia 016 Neoscortechinia 0 Endospermum Hevea above branches are bootstrap percentages. Pogonophora Licania 67 Chrysobalanus 0 48 99Hirtella Atuna 51 Dichapetalum 8939 Trigonia 0 16 Euphronia Balanops Aporusa 9 Lacistema 0 Ixerba 0 Guaiacum 62 Krameria Connarus 92 Rourea 33 Averrhoa 54 97 Dapania 44 Oxalis Cephalotus 0 Brunellia 251 43 Eucryphia Sloanea 3 Crinodendron 3 0 Hydrangea 4 Elaeocarpus Hua 99 Afrostyrax Helianthemum 82 Anisoptera 13 Bixa 0 Physena 9 1 Thymelaea Sterculia 69 Gossypium Chrysolepis 0 99 Quercus 92 17 Fagus Nothofagus 21 Alnus 70 Casuarina 58 5 Juglans 80 Myrica Viviania Begonia 0 28 Geranium 7 Rhamnus 46 1 Ceanothus 0 0 Crossosoma Celtis 97 Zelkova Datisca 0 Cucumis 63 20 Cucurbita 0 5 Coriaria 0 Anisophyllea Circaeaster 0 Spiraea 48 Prunus 5 Morus Stackhousia 71 Denhamia 6 Elaeodendron 51 36 Plagiopteron Brexia 45 Maytenus 0 92 Tripterygium 100 33 Celastrus 93 Paxistima 84 52 Euonymus Siphonodon Parnassia 18 Swietenia 23 Citrus 15 Ailanthus 47 0 Bursera 7075 Schinus Cupaniopsis Pilea Brassica 97 Arabidopsis 42 13 Capparis 3 Floerkea 14 Reseda Batis 26 0 Carica 11 Tropaeolum Pisum 51 Medicago 61 88Cicer 20 Glycine 6 Stylobasium 0 Polygala 0 Oenothera Olinia 82 0 Crypteronia 38 Clidemia 12 Eucalyptus 0 9 26 Lythrum Terminalia Vitis 89 Leea Tapiscia 25 Dipentodon Soyauxia 31 Ribes 2 Peridiscus 15 1 Saxifraga Kalanchoe 17 0 Choristylis Haloragis 6 100 Myriophyllum 34 30 Penthorum 32 Tetracarpaea 69 Aphanopetalum Paeonia Liquidambar 2515 Daphniphyllum 7 0 Cercidiphyllum Exbucklandia 17 Corylopsis 0 Opilia 82 Schoepa 82 14 Gaiadendron Santalum 0 0 2 Ximenia Heisteria Sabia Buxus 79 Pachysandra 41 Didymeles 14 Myrothamnus 24 Tetracentron Hydrocotyle 53 Hedera 41 4 Panax 35 Mackinlaya Pittosporum 34 Myodocarpus 98 39 Delarbrea Apium 80 100 Angelica 14 Azorella 14 Melanophylla Griselinia 4 Quintinia 43 62 Polyosma Paracryphia 11 Escallonia 33 Pennantia Dipsacus 46 Scabiosa 16 4Abelia 0 Dipelta 11 Triplostegia 26 Valeriana 3536 Morina 8 Patrinia Lonicera 7 85 4 Symphoricarpos 5 Diervilla 16Viburnum Sambucus 0 92 Adoxa Desfontainia 7 95 Columellia Corokia 3 Alseuosmia Eremosyne 0 Lobelia 17 Campanula 0 Menyanthes 65 Nymphoides Helianthus 69 Tagetes 49 25 Tragopogon 1 10Gerbera 17Boopis 0 23 Barnadesia 2 Scaevola Phelline 0 Dioscorea 1 0 14 Donatia Roussea 0 Pentaphragma 94 Carpodetus 12 Stylidium Lactuca Solanum 71 Nicotiana 9 Hydrolea 8 Hydrophyllum 0 41 Ehretia Montinia 22 Cuscuta 26 11 Borago Ipomoea 25 Coea 58 Nerium 48 65 Gelsemium 9 58 Exacum 1 Galium Vahlia Lamium 27 Pedicularis 7 Phryma 37 Pinguicula 14 25 Sesamum 21 2 Paulownia Antirrhinum 34 1119 Verbena 42 Scrophularia 19 Catalpa 0 Acanthus 2142 7 Byblis Icacina 0 Jasminum 4 Berzelia Cardiopteris 50 Eucommia 30 5 Gonocaryum Ilex 69 55 Helwingia 32 Phyllonoma Garrya Gunnera 12 Oncotheca Sarracenia 26 Actinidia 8 Clethra 82 9 Arbutus 0 Diospyros 26 0 Cyrilla Camellia 349 Ternstroemia 4 Irvingbaileya 1 Styrax Galax 213 Fouquieria Couroupita Primula 96 Androsace 98 0 0 Clavija 20 Tetramerista 84 0 Impatiens 1 Lotus 0 6 Manilkara Polemonium 1 Petalonyx 100 Mentzelia Nyssa 91 Cornus Aextoxicon 44 Berberidopsis 20 Meliosma Nandina 78 24 Caulophyllum Ranunculus 15 Tinospora 81 Menispermum 5 Decaisnea 88 Lardizabala 82 Sargentodoxa 7 Glaucidium 3 55 Hydrastis 0 Hypecoum 37 Dicentra 30 Eschscholzia 0 7 Euptelea Petrophile 45 Roupala 18 20 Nelumbo Platanus Drimys 47 Takhtajania 95 Tasmannia 71 Canella 98 Cinnamodendron 7 Chloranthus 31 93 Sarcandra Hedyosmum 0 Magnolia 84 Liriodendron 23 Galbulimima 27 Cananga 51 99 Annona Eupomatia Daphnandra 89 Atherosperma 2 69 Gomortega 24 Laurus 1070 Cryptocarya 27 Peumus 12 Gyrocarpus 63 Hedycarya Siparuna 26 23 Hernandia 0 Idiospermum 49 Calycanthus Saccharum 59 Zea 97 20 Oryza 40 Tradescantia Sparganium 10 Musa 90 Strelitzia 0 Yucca 91 Agave 62 Xanthorrhoea 6 Smilax 52 Lilium 0 Mauloutchia 99 Myristica 18 Elaeis 8 99 Chamaedorea 0 0 Oncidium 1 Carludovica 71 Croomia 0 Typha 44 Blandfordia Spathiphyllum 0 67 Orontium Triglochin 84 0 Potamogeton 23 Alisma 0 Pleea 71 Toeldia 0 Ceratophyllum 6 Curtisia 0 Thottea 94 Aristolochia 37 31 Lactoris Saruma Piper 82 Peperomia 30 67 Saururus 63 Houttuynia Brasenia 50 Nymphaea 87 18 Cabomba Acorus Schisandra 95 Kadsura 59 46 Austrobaileya 21 Illicium Amborella Zamia 15 Pinus 28 Welwitschia 99 35 Gnetum Podocarpus 25 63 Metasequoia Cycas 86 Ginkgo 0.2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Creation and Carnivory in the Pitcher Plants of Nepenthaceae and Sarraceniaceae
    OPEN ACCESS JCTS Article SERIES B Creation and Carnivory in the Pitcher Plants of Nepenthaceae and Sarraceniaceae R.W. Sanders and T.C. Wood Core Academy of Science, Dayton, TN Abstract The morphological adaptations of carnivorous plants and taxonomic distributions of those adaptations are reviewed, as are the conflicting classifications of the plants based on the adaptations, reproductive morphology, and DNA sequences. To begin developing a creationist understanding of the origin of plant carnivory, we here focus specifically on pitcher plants of Nepenthaceae and Sarraceniaceae because their popularity as cultivated curiosities has generated a literature resource amenable to baraminological analysis. Hybridization records were augmented by total nucleotide differences to assess species similarities. Nonhybridizing species falling within the molecular range of hybridizing species were included in the monobaramin of the hybridizing species. The combined data support each of the three genera of the Sarraceniaceae as a monobaramin, but the three could not be combined into a larger monobaramin. With the Nepenthaceae, the data unequivocally place 73% of the species in a single monobaramin, strongly suggesting the whole genus (and, thus, family) is a monobaramin. The lack of variation in the carnivorous habit provides no evidence for the intrabaraminic origin of carnivory from non-carnivorous plants. An array of fascinating symbiotic relationships of pitchers in some species with unusual bacteria, insects, and vertebrates are known and suggest the origin of carnivory from benign functions of the adaptive structures. However, these symbioses still do not account for the apparent complex design for carnivory characteristic of all species in the two families. Editor: J.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Widespread Paleopolyploidy, Gene Tree Conflict, and Recalcitrant Relationships Among the 3 Carnivorous Caryophyllales1 4 5 Joseph F
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/115741; this version posted March 10, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 2 Widespread paleopolyploidy, gene tree conflict, and recalcitrant relationships among the 3 carnivorous Caryophyllales1 4 5 Joseph F. Walker*,2, Ya Yang2,5, Michael J. Moore3, Jessica Mikenas3, Alfonso Timoneda4, Samuel F. 6 Brockington4 and Stephen A. Smith*,2 7 8 2Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 830 North University Avenue, 9 Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1048, USA 10 3Department of Biology, Oberlin College, Science Center K111, 119 Woodland St., Oberlin, Ohio 44074- 11 1097 USA 12 4Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EA, United Kingdom 13 5 Department of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities. 1445 Gortner Avenue, St. Paul, MN 14 55108 15 CORRESPONDING AUTHORS: Joseph F. Walker; [email protected] and Stephen A. Smith; 16 [email protected] 17 18 1Manuscript received ____; revision accepted ______. bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/115741; this version posted March 10, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 19 ABSTRACT 20 • The carnivorous members of the large, hyperdiverse Caryophyllales (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancistrocladus Benomensis (Ancistrocladaceae): a New Species from Peninsular Malaysia
    BLUMEA 50: 357–365 Published on 14 July 2005 http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/000651905X623021 ANCISTROCLADUS BENOMENSIS (ANCISTROCLADACEAE): A NEW SPECIES FROM PENINSULAR MALAYSIA H. RISCHER1,2,5, G. HEUBL3, H. MEIMBERG3, M. DREYER2, H.A. HADI 4 & G. BRINGMANN1,5 SUMMARY Ancistrocladus benomensis Rischer & G. Bringmann, a new species from Gunung Benom, Malaysia is described and illustrated. Diagnostic notes concerning morphology, occurrence of specific naphthyl­ isoquinoline alkaloids, and support from molecular analyses are provided. Key words: Ancistrocladus benomensis, Ancistrocladaceae, Gunung Benom, Malaysia. INTRODUCTION The monotypic genus Ancistrocladus Wall. (Ancistrocladaceae) comprises approxi­ mately 20 species (Gereau, 1997) and is characterized by a disjunct distribution in the palaeotropics with two areas of speciation, one in tropical West and Central Africa and one in South East Asia. All taxa are scandent shrubs or woody lianas with tendril­ like modified shoots provided with characteristic circinate woody hooks as climbing devices. Recently a synoptic revision of the African taxa of the genus Ancistrocladus has been presented by Cheek (2000), with an identification key and detailed information concerning taxonomy, distribution, and ecology of the 13 species recognized. For the Asian taxa an equivalent comprehensive study is still lacking and there is much uncertainty in the delimitation of taxa as well as on ecological preferences, seed set, pollination, and flowering rhythm. Concerning taxonomy one has to refer to a synopsis presented by Gilg (1925) and to an annotated checklist of species which was compiled by Gereau (1997) based on a survey of local floras. In this latter overview a detailed account on the typification for 25 binominals is presented, including 12 valid species recognized by the author for South East Asia: A.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancistrocladaceae
    Soltis et al—American Journal of Botany 98(4):704-730. 2011. – Data Supplement S2 – page 1 Soltis, Douglas E., Stephen A. Smith, Nico Cellinese, Kenneth J. Wurdack, David C. Tank, Samuel F. Brockington, Nancy F. Refulio-Rodriguez, Jay B. Walker, Michael J. Moore, Barbara S. Carlsward, Charles D. Bell, Maribeth Latvis, Sunny Crawley, Chelsea Black, Diaga Diouf, Zhenxiang Xi, Catherine A. Rushworth, Matthew A. Gitzendanner, Kenneth J. Sytsma, Yin-Long Qiu, Khidir W. Hilu, Charles C. Davis, Michael J. Sanderson, Reed S. Beaman, Richard G. Olmstead, Walter S. Judd, Michael J. Donoghue, and Pamela S. Soltis. Angiosperm phylogeny: 17 genes, 640 taxa. American Journal of Botany 98(4): 704-730. Appendix S2. The maximum likelihood majority-rule consensus from the 17-gene analysis shown as a phylogram with mtDNA included for Polyosma. Names of the orders and families follow APG III (2009); other names follow Cantino et al. (2007). Numbers above branches are bootstrap percentages. 67 Acalypha Spathiostemon 100 Ricinus 97 100 Dalechampia Lasiocroton 100 100 Conceveiba Homalanthus 96 Hura Euphorbia 88 Pimelodendron 100 Trigonostemon Euphorbiaceae Codiaeum (incl. Peraceae) 100 Croton Hevea Manihot 10083 Moultonianthus Suregada 98 81 Tetrorchidium Omphalea 100 Endospermum Neoscortechinia 100 98 Pera Clutia Pogonophora 99 Cespedesia Sauvagesia 99 Luxemburgia Ochna Ochnaceae 100 100 53 Quiina Touroulia Medusagyne Caryocar Caryocaraceae 100 Chrysobalanus 100 Atuna Chrysobalananaceae 100 100 Licania Hirtella 100 Euphronia Euphroniaceae 100 Dichapetalum 100
    [Show full text]
  • The Alkaloids of <I>Triphyophyllum Peltatum</I> (Dioncophyllaceae)
    BIOLOGICALL Y ACTIVE AGENTS IN NATURE 18 CHIMIA 52 (1998) Nr. 1/2 (Jannar/Fcb"mr) Chimia 52 (1998) 18-28 methods. The first alkaloid to be investi- © Neue Sclnveizerische Chemische Gesellschaft gated was dioncophylline A [18][19], the ISSN 0009-4293 main secondary metabolite ofT. peltatum. It is easily accessible by standard isolation procedures, and was found to have a naph- The Alkaloids of Triphyophyllum thylisoquinoline basic structure mainly by NMR investigations (Fig. 4). It has three peltatum (Dioncophyllaceae) [1] stereogenic units: two stereocenters (C( I), C(3»and astereogenic axis (C(7) ~C(I'». Its structural elucidation thus requires at Gerhard Bringrnanna)*, Guido Fran~oisb), Laurent Ake Assn, and least three pieces of stereochemical infor- U Jan Schlauer ) mation. Dedicated to Professor Meinhart H. Zenk, University of Munich, on the occasion of his 2.1. The Relative Configuration at the 65th birthday. Stereocenters: through NMR From an NOE interaction of the axial proton at C(3) (Fig. 5) with the likewise Abstract. A great diversity of naphthylisoquinolines, presumably acetogenic biaryl axial Me group at C( 1), a relative cis-array alkaloids, has been obtained from the West-African liana Triphyophyllumpeltatum. By of these two spin systems and thus trans- the example of dioncophylline A, the main alkaloid from T. peltatum, we illustrate the orientation of the two Me groups was various methods of structural elucidation established in our laboratory. The structural deduced, establishing an (R,R)- (or an peculiarities of some of the minor alkaloids from the same species are discussed. A (5,5)-!) configuration [18] - the first re- perspective on the interesting biological activities of various alkaloids from T.peltatum quired stereochemical information.
    [Show full text]
  • Caryophyllales: a Key Group for Understanding Wood
    Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2010, 164, 342–393. With 21 figures Caryophyllales: a key group for understanding wood anatomy character states and their evolutionboj_1095 342..393 SHERWIN CARLQUIST FLS* Santa Barbara Botanic Garden, 1212 Mission Canyon Road, Santa Barbara, CA 93110, USA Received 13 May 2010; accepted for publication 28 September 2010 Definitions of character states in woods are softer than generally assumed, and more complex for workers to interpret. Only by a constant effort to transcend the limitations of glossaries can a more than partial understanding of wood anatomy and its evolution be achieved. The need for such an effort is most evident in a major group with sufficient wood diversity to demonstrate numerous problems in wood anatomical features. Caryophyllales s.l., with approximately 12 000 species, are such a group. Paradoxically, Caryophyllales offer many more interpretive problems than other ‘typically woody’ eudicot clades of comparable size: a wider range of wood structural patterns is represented in the order. An account of character expression diversity is presented for major wood characters of Caryophyllales. These characters include successive cambia (more extensively represented in Caryophyllales than elsewhere in angiosperms); vessel element perforation plates (non-bordered and bordered, with and without constrictions); lateral wall pitting of vessels (notably pseudoscalariform patterns); vesturing and sculpturing on vessel walls; grouping of vessels; nature of tracheids and fibre-tracheids, storying in libriform fibres, types of axial parenchyma, ray anatomy and shifts in ray ontogeny; juvenilism in rays; raylessness; occurrence of idioblasts; occurrence of a new cell type (ancistrocladan cells); correlations of raylessness with scattered bundle occurrence and other anatomical discoveries newly described and/or understood through the use of scanning electron microscopy and light microscopy.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Angiosperm Pollen. 5. Early Diverging Superasteridae
    Evolution of Angiosperm Pollen. 5. Early Diverging Superasteridae (Berberidopsidales, Caryophyllales, Cornales, Ericales, and Santalales) Plus Dilleniales Author(s): Ying Yu, Alexandra H. Wortley, Lu Lu, De-Zhu Li, Hong Wang and Stephen Blackmore Source: Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 103(1):106-161. Published By: Missouri Botanical Garden https://doi.org/10.3417/2017017 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.3417/2017017 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/ page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non- commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. EVOLUTION OF ANGIOSPERM Ying Yu,2 Alexandra H. Wortley,3 Lu Lu,2,4 POLLEN. 5. EARLY DIVERGING De-Zhu Li,2,4* Hong Wang,2,4* and SUPERASTERIDAE Stephen Blackmore3 (BERBERIDOPSIDALES, CARYOPHYLLALES, CORNALES, ERICALES, AND SANTALALES) PLUS DILLENIALES1 ABSTRACT This study, the fifth in a series investigating palynological characters in angiosperms, aims to explore the distribution of states for 19 pollen characters on five early diverging orders of Superasteridae (Berberidopsidales, Caryophyllales, Cornales, Ericales, and Santalales) plus Dilleniales.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancistrocladus Korupensis and Prunus Africana
    CBD Distr. CONVENTION ON GENERAL BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY UNEP/CBD/COP/4/Inf.25 20 April 1998 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Fourth meeting Bratislava, Slovakia 4 to 15 May 1998 Item 16.3 of the provisional agenda Benefit-Sharing Case Studies: Aristocladus korupensis and Prunus africana Submission by the United Nations Environment Programme /… UNEP/CBD/COP/4/Inf.10 Page 2 Benefit-Sharing Case Studies: Ancistrocladus korupensis and Prunus africana 1. In response to the Call for Case Studies on Benefit Sharing Arrangements by the Convention on Biological Diversity, and in accordance with Decisions III/11, III/14, III/15, and III/18, the United Nations Environment Programme commissioned the development of two case studies on benefit sharing arrangements. 2. The case studies analyze the access and benefit-sharing issues and give policy conclusions and recommendations using the indicative outline for case studies on benefit sharing arrangements prepared by the Secretariat to the Convention on Biological Diversity. 3. Case Study 1 examines the US National Cancer Institute (NCI)’s development of the anti-HIV compound michellamine B which is derived from Ancistrocladus korupensis. A. korupensis is a rainforest liana which is locally endemic, but spans the border between Cameroon and Nigeria. Original collections were conducted within the Korup National Park in Cameroon. The case study analyzes the process benefits provided by the NCI’s investment in a domestication and cultivation program for A. korupensis within Cameroon. The case study also analyzes the legal issues surrounding the negotiations between the NCI, the Government of Cameroon, and other domestic stakeholders which spurred the inclusion of access and benefit sharing provisions within Forestry Law No.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded on 06 October 2019
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/825273; this version posted October 31, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Notes on the threatened lowland forests of Mt Cameroon and their endemics including Drypetes njonji sp. nov., with a key to species of Drypetes sect. Stipulares (Putranjivaceae). Martin Cheek1, Nouhou Ndam2, Andrew Budden1 1Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, UK 2Tetra Tech ARD - West Africa Biodiversity & Climate Change (WA BiCC) Program PMB CT58 Accra, Ghana Author for correspondence: [email protected] ABSTRACT Background and aims – This paper reports a further discovery of a new endemic threatened species to science in the context of long-term botanical surveys in the lowland coastal forests of Mount Cameroon specifically and generally in the Cross River-Sanaga interval of west-central Africa. These studies focus on species discovery and conservation through the Tropical Important Plant Areas programme. Methods – Normal practices of herbarium taxonomy have been applied to study the material collected. The relevant collections are stored in the Herbarium of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London and at the Limbe Botanic Garden, Limbe, and the Institute of Research in Agronomic Development – National Herbarium of Cameroon, Yaoundé. Key results – New species to science continue to be discovered from Mt Cameroon. Most of these species are rare, highly localised, and threatened by habitat destruction. These discoveries increase the justification for improved conservation management of surviving habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Journalofthreatenedtaxa
    OPEN ACCESS The Journal of Threatened Taxa fs dedfcated to bufldfng evfdence for conservafon globally by publfshfng peer-revfewed arfcles onlfne every month at a reasonably rapfd rate at www.threatenedtaxa.org . All arfcles publfshed fn JoTT are regfstered under Creafve Commons Atrfbufon 4.0 Internafonal Lfcense unless otherwfse menfoned. JoTT allows unrestrfcted use of arfcles fn any medfum, reproducfon, and dfstrfbufon by provfdfng adequate credft to the authors and the source of publfcafon. Journal of Threatened Taxa Bufldfng evfdence for conservafon globally www.threatenedtaxa.org ISSN 0974-7907 (Onlfne) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Prfnt) Artfcle Florfstfc dfversfty of Bhfmashankar Wfldlffe Sanctuary, northern Western Ghats, Maharashtra, Indfa Savfta Sanjaykumar Rahangdale & Sanjaykumar Ramlal Rahangdale 26 August 2017 | Vol. 9| No. 8 | Pp. 10493–10527 10.11609/jot. 3074 .9. 8. 10493-10527 For Focus, Scope, Afms, Polfcfes and Gufdelfnes vfsft htp://threatenedtaxa.org/About_JoTT For Arfcle Submfssfon Gufdelfnes vfsft htp://threatenedtaxa.org/Submfssfon_Gufdelfnes For Polfcfes agafnst Scfenffc Mfsconduct vfsft htp://threatenedtaxa.org/JoTT_Polfcy_agafnst_Scfenffc_Mfsconduct For reprfnts contact <[email protected]> Publfsher/Host Partner Threatened Taxa Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 August 2017 | 9(8): 10493–10527 Article Floristic diversity of Bhimashankar Wildlife Sanctuary, northern Western Ghats, Maharashtra, India Savita Sanjaykumar Rahangdale 1 & Sanjaykumar Ramlal Rahangdale2 ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) 1 Department of Botany, B.J. Arts, Commerce & Science College, Ale, Pune District, Maharashtra 412411, India 2 Department of Botany, A.W. Arts, Science & Commerce College, Otur, Pune District, Maharashtra 412409, India OPEN ACCESS 1 [email protected], 2 [email protected] (corresponding author) Abstract: Bhimashankar Wildlife Sanctuary (BWS) is located on the crestline of the northern Western Ghats in Pune and Thane districts in Maharashtra State.
    [Show full text]
  • From Cacti to Carnivores: Improved Phylotranscriptomic Sampling And
    Article Type: Special Issue Article RESEARCH ARTICLE INVITED SPECIAL ARTICLE For the Special Issue: Using and Navigating the Plant Tree of Life Short Title: Walker et al.—Phylotranscriptomic analysis of Caryophyllales From cacti to carnivores: Improved phylotranscriptomic sampling and hierarchical homology inference provide further insight into the evolution of Caryophyllales Joseph F. Walker1,13, Ya Yang2, Tao Feng3, Alfonso Timoneda3, Jessica Mikenas4,5, Vera Hutchison4, Caroline Edwards4, Ning Wang1, Sonia Ahluwalia1, Julia Olivieri4,6, Nathanael Walker-Hale7, Lucas C. Majure8, Raúl Puente8, Gudrun Kadereit9,10, Maximilian Lauterbach9,10, Urs Eggli11, Hilda Flores-Olvera12, Helga Ochoterena12, Samuel F. Brockington3, Michael J. Moore,4 and Stephen A. Smith1,13 Manuscript received 13 October 2017; revision accepted 4 January 2018. 1 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 830 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1048 USA 2 Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 1445 Gortner Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108 USA 3 Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EA, UK 4 Department of Biology, Oberlin College, Science Center K111, 119 Woodland Street, Oberlin, OH 44074-1097 USA 5 Current address: USGS Canyonlands Research Station, Southwest Biological Science Center, 2290 S West Resource Blvd, Moab, UT 84532 USA 6 Institute of Computational and Mathematical Engineering (ICME), Stanford University, 475 Author Manuscript Via Ortega, Suite B060, Stanford, CA, 94305-4042 USA This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record.
    [Show full text]
  • Disparity, Diversity, and Duplications in the Caryophyllales
    Research Disparity, diversity, and duplications in the Caryophyllales Stephen A. Smith1, Joseph W. Brown1, Ya Yang2, Riva Bruenn3, Chloe P. Drummond3, Samuel F. Brockington4, Joseph F. Walker1, Noah Last2, Norman A. Douglas3 and Michael J. Moore3 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48103, USA; 2Department of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 1445 Gortner Avenue, St Paul, MN 55108, USA; 3Department of Biology, Oberlin College, 119 Woodland St, Oberlin, OH 44074-1097, USA; 4Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK Summary Author for correspondence: The role played by whole genome duplication (WGD) in plant evolution is actively debated. Stephen A. Smith WGDs have been associated with advantages such as superior colonization, various adapta- Tel: +1 734 615 5510 tions, and increased effective population size. However, the lack of a comprehensive mapping Email: [email protected] of WGDs within a major plant clade has led to uncertainty regarding the potential association Received: 30 May 2017 of WGDs and higher diversification rates. Accepted: 28 July 2017 Using seven chloroplast and nuclear ribosomal genes, we constructed a phylogeny of 5036 species of Caryophyllales, representing nearly half of the extant species. We phylogenetically New Phytologist (2017) mapped putative WGDs as identified from analyses on transcriptomic and genomic data and doi: 10.1111/nph.14772 analyzed these in conjunction with shifts in climatic occupancy and lineage diversification rate. Thirteen putative WGDs and 27 diversification shifts could be mapped onto the phylogeny. Key words: Caryophyllales, climatic occupancy, diversification rates, duplications, Of these, four WGDs were concurrent with diversification shifts, with other diversification phylogenomics.
    [Show full text]