Chemical Kinetics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chemical Kinetics Chemical Kinetics P. J. Grandinetti Chem. 4300 P. J. Grandinetti (Chem. 4300) Chemical Kinetics 1 / 60 Chemical Kinetics How do reactants become products? Í What is the mechanism? What is the time scale of the reaction? Í How fast are reactants consumed and products formed? P. J. Grandinetti (Chem. 4300) Chemical Kinetics 2 / 60 Chemical Kinetics Consider generic reaction: ◦ 휉 nA = nA * a n = n◦ * b휉 → B B aA + bB cC + dD where ◦ 휉 nC = nC + c ◦ 휉 nD = nD + d for each substance we have where 휉 is extent (or advancement) of chemical reaction. ◦ 휈 휉 ni = ni + i ni is number of moles of ith species, or n◦ is initial number of moles of ith species, 1 ◦ i 휉 = .n * n / 휈 휈 i i i is stoichiometric coefficient for ith species in i reaction, Í 휈 > for products d휉 1 dni i 0 rate = = Í 휈 < 휈 i 0 for reactants dt i dt P. J. Grandinetti (Chem. 4300) Chemical Kinetics 3 / 60 Reaction Rates We define the reaction rate as d휉 1 dni rate = = 휈 dt i dt 1 dnNO dnO 1 dnN O e.g., 4 NO .g/ + O .g/ ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,→ 2 N O .g/; rate = * 2 = * 2 = 2 5 2 2 2 5 4 dt dt 2 dt In definition so far reaction rate is extensive property. To make it intensive divide by system volume 0 1 rate 1 d휉 1 1 dni 1 d[i] R = = = 휈 = 휈 V V dt V i dt i dt R is an intensive reaction rate. It has dimensionality of concentration per time. [i] is molar concentration of ith species. More accurate to use activities instead of concentration, but concentration is good approximation in ideal systems. Reaction rates will depend on p, T, and concentration of reaction species. Rates also depend on phase or phases in which reaction occurs. Í Homogeneous reactions occur in a single phase Í Heterogeneous reactions involve multiple phases, e.g. reactions on surfaces. P. J. Grandinetti (Chem. 4300) Chemical Kinetics 4 / 60 Definition Rate Law relates rates to concentration of reactants and products Often we can define rate law in the form: R = k[A]훼[B]훽 5 k is the rate constant Overall reaction order is 훼 + 훽. 훼 and 훽 are partial reaction orders (usually integers but not necessarily). Reaction is 훼 order with respect to A Reaction is 훽 order with respect to B Determining the rate law for reaction or order of reaction must be done experimentally. Later, we will examine on a deeper level why reactions have a given order. P. J. Grandinetti (Chem. 4300) Chemical Kinetics 5 / 60 Zeroth order reaction d[A] Reaction: A ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,→ P has rate law: R = * = k[A]훼 dt if 훼 = 0 then reaction is zeroth order in A and has rate law: d[A] = *k dt Rearranging and integrating [A]t t Ê d[A] = *k Ê dt [A]0 0 gives [A]t *[A]0 = *kt or [A]t = [A]0 * kt The unit of k would be mol/(L⋅s). P. J. Grandinetti (Chem. 4300) Chemical Kinetics 6 / 60 Zeroth order reaction 100 80 0th order 60 [A] 40 20 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 time/seconds Zeroth order rate laws typically occurs when rate is limited by the concentration of a catalyst, e.g., ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,→ 2 N2O(g) 2 N2(g) + O2(g) in presence of Pt surface catalyst. P. J. Grandinetti (Chem. 4300) Chemical Kinetics 7 / 60 First order reaction Consider this simple example A ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,→ Products where d[A] rate = * = k[A]1 dt Integrated rate law is ¨ [A]t¨ d[A] t = *k dt Ê [A] Ê [A]0 0 [A]t *kt ln = *kt or [A]t = [A]0e [A]0 units of k would be 1/s. P. J. Grandinetti (Chem. 4300) Chemical Kinetics 8 / 60 First order reaction 100 80 0th order 60 [A] 40 20 1st order 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 time/seconds P. J. Grandinetti (Chem. 4300) Chemical Kinetics 9 / 60 First order reaction 100 0th order 80 60 [A] 40 20 1st order 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 time/seconds P. J. Grandinetti (Chem. 4300) Chemical Kinetics 10 / 60 First order reaction – Log concentration plot 5 0th order 4 3 2 log([A]/M) 1st order 1 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 time/seconds P. J. Grandinetti (Chem. 4300) Chemical Kinetics 11 / 60 First order reaction – Log concentration plot 5 0th order 4 3 1st order 2 log([A]/M) 1 2nd order 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 time/seconds P. J. Grandinetti (Chem. 4300) Chemical Kinetics 12 / 60 First order reaction - Half Life Sometimes it’s convenient to define a quantity called the half life, t1_2, particularly for 1st order reactions. t1_2 is the time needed for the reaction to be half complete, i.e., [A] 1 [A] 1 t1_2 0 1 when [A] = [A] then ln = ln 2 = ln = *kt t1_2 0 1_2 2 [A]0 [A0] 2 which gives t 1 = ln 2_k ù 0:693_k (only for 1st order reaction) 2 Half life of 1st-order reaction depends only on reaction rate constant and is independent of [A]0. This is not true for 2nd and 3rd order reactions. P. J. Grandinetti (Chem. 4300) Chemical Kinetics 13 / 60 First order reaction Example ◦ Benzene diazonium chloride undergoes 1st-order thermal decomposition in H2O at 50 C with : : a rate constant of k = 0 071/min. If the initial concentration is [A]0 = 0 01 M, how long must it be heated at 50 ◦C to reduce its concentration by half? : : t1_2 = ln 2_k = ln 2_.0 071_min/ = 9 9 min Note that result is independent of initial concentration, [A]0. P. J. Grandinetti (Chem. 4300) Chemical Kinetics 14 / 60 Second order reaction Here we have d[A] A ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,→ Products with * = k[A]2 dt Integrating rate expression gives ¨ [A]t¨ d[A] t = *k dt Ê 2 Ê [A]0 [A] 0 1 1 = + kt [A]t [A]0 units of k would be L/(mol⋅s). Rearranging gives [A]0 [A]t = 1 + [A]0kt P. J. Grandinetti (Chem. 4300) Chemical Kinetics 15 / 60 Second order reaction 100 0th order 80 60 [A] 40 1st order 20 2nd order 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 time/seconds P. J. Grandinetti (Chem. 4300) Chemical Kinetics 16 / 60 Second order reaction – inverse concentration plot 2.0 2nd order 1.5 1/[A] 1.0 0.5 0th order 1st order 0.0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 time/seconds P. J. Grandinetti (Chem. 4300) Chemical Kinetics 17 / 60 Second order reaction – inverse concentration plot 2.0 2nd order 1.5 1/[A] 1.0 0.5 1st order 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 time/seconds P. J. Grandinetti (Chem. 4300) Chemical Kinetics 18 / 60 Another kind of second order reaction d[A] d[B] A + B ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,→ Products where * = * = k[A][B] dt dt after some clever math we obtain 1 [B] [A] ln 0 t = kt [A]0 *[B]0 [A]0[B]t If [A]0 = [B]0 then solution is like previous 2nd-order example, i.e. 1 1 = + kt [A]t [A]0 P. J. Grandinetti (Chem. 4300) Chemical Kinetics 19 / 60 Another kind of second order reaction 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 time/seconds P. J. Grandinetti (Chem. 4300) Chemical Kinetics 20 / 60 Measuring Reaction Rate Order P. J. Grandinetti (Chem. 4300) Chemical Kinetics 21 / 60 Measuring Reaction Rate Order rate = k[A]훼[B]훽 5 [L]휆 need to determine orders, 훼, 훽,..., 휆 before measuring k. Half-life method Differential (initial rate) method Isolation method P. J. Grandinetti (Chem. 4300) Chemical Kinetics 22 / 60 Half-Life Method When rate law has the form rate = k[A]n then one can show that 2n*1 * 1 log t = log + .1 * n/ log [A] 10 1_2 10 .n * 1/k 10 0 and a plot of log10 t1_2 versus log10[A]0 gives a straight line with a slope of 1 * n. 1 Plot [A] versus t 2 Pick any [A] value and find the time interval, t1_2, for it to fall to half its value. 3 Pick another [A] value and repeat step 2. 4 Repeat step 3 several times and then plot log10 t1_2 versus log10[A]0 5 The slope will be 1 * n. P. J. Grandinetti (Chem. 4300) Chemical Kinetics 23 / 60 Half-Life Method 0.0 100 -0.2 90 t1/2= 0.100 min for [A] = 100 to 50 80 -0.4 70 t1/2= 0.125 min for [A] = 80 to 40 /min) 60 1/2 -0.6 [A] 50 t1/2= 0.167 min for [A] = 60 to 30 Log(t 40 -0.8 30 20 -1.0 10 0 -1.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 time/minutes Log([A]0/M) In this example, a 2nd-order rate (n = 2) gives slope of 1 * n = *1. P. J. Grandinetti (Chem. 4300) Chemical Kinetics 24 / 60 Differential (Initial Rate) Method n Since rate = k[A] then ln.rate/ = ln k + n ln[A]t, that is, slope is n. 100 3.00 d[A=100]/dt = 1000 mol/(L•s) 2.75 80 d[A=80]/dt = 640 mol/(L•s) 2.50 2.25 d[A=60]/dt = 360 mol/(L•s) 2.00 60 d[A=40]/dt = 160 mol/(L•s) 1.75 [A] 1.50 40 1.25 1.00 0.75 20 log(rate/ mol/(L•s)) 0.50 0.25 0.00 0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 time/seconds log([A]0/M) For rate = k[A]n[B]m 5, vary [A] while holding other reactant concentrations constant.
Recommended publications
  • Rate Constants and Kinetic Isotope Effects for Methoxy Radical Reacting with NO2 and O2 Jiajue Chai, Hongyi Hu, Theodore
    Rate Constants and Kinetic Isotope Effects for Methoxy Radical Reacting with NO2 and O2 Jiajue Chai, Hongyi Hu, Theodore. S. Dibble* Department of Chemistry, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York, Syracuse, New York 13210, United States Geoffrey. S. Tyndall,* and John. J. Orlando Atmospheric Chemistry Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado 80307, United States Abstract Relative rate studies were carried out to determine the temperature dependent rate constant ratio k1/k2a: CH3O• + O2 → HCHO + HO2• (R1) CH3O• + NO2 (+M) → CH3ONO2 (+ M) (R2a) over the temperature range 250-333 K in an environmental chamber at 700 Torr using FTIR detection. Absolute rate constants k2 were determined using laser flash photolysis/laser induced fluorescence under the same conditions. The analogous experiments were carried out for the reactions of perdeuterated methoxy radical (CD3O•). Absolute rate constants k2 were in excellent agreement with the recommendations of the JPL Data Evaluation panel. The combined data (i.e., 3 -1 k1/k2 and k2) allow determination of k1 as cm s , corresponding to 1.4 × 10-15 cm3 s-1 at 298 K. The rate constant at 298 K is in excellent agreement with previous work, but the observed temperature dependence is less than previously reported. The deuterium isotope effect, kH/kD, can be expressed in Arrhenius form as The deuterium isotope effect does not appear to be greatly influenced by tunneling, which is consistent with previous theoretical work by Hu and Dibble (Hu, H.; Dibble, T. S., J. Phys. Chem. A 2013, 117, 14230–14242). Keywords: methylnitrite, formaldehyde, methylnitrate, alkoxy radicals, kinetic isotope effect * [email protected], [email protected] 1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Eyring Equation
    Search Buy/Sell Used Reactors Glass microreactors Hydrogenation Reactor Buy Or Sell Used Reactors Here. Save Time Microreactors made of glass and lab High performance reactor technology Safe And Money Through IPPE! systems for chemical synthesis scale-up. Worldwide supply www.IPPE.com www.mikroglas.com www.biazzi.com Reactors & Calorimeters Induction Heating Reacting Flow Simulation Steam Calculator For Process R&D Laboratories Check Out Induction Heating Software & Mechanisms for Excel steam table add-in for water Automated & Manual Solutions From A Trusted Source. Chemical, Combustion & Materials and steam properties www.helgroup.com myewoss.biz Processes www.chemgoodies.com www.reactiondesign.com Eyring Equation Peter Keusch, University of Regensburg German version "If the Lord Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I should have recommended something simpler." Alphonso X, the Wise of Spain (1223-1284) "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." Albert Einstein Both the Arrhenius and the Eyring equation describe the temperature dependence of reaction rate. Strictly speaking, the Arrhenius equation can be applied only to the kinetics of gas reactions. The Eyring equation is also used in the study of solution reactions and mixed phase reactions - all places where the simple collision model is not very helpful. The Arrhenius equation is founded on the empirical observation that rates of reactions increase with temperature. The Eyring equation is a theoretical construct, based on transition state model. The bimolecular reaction is considered by 'transition state theory'. According to the transition state model, the reactants are getting over into an unsteady intermediate state on the reaction pathway.
    [Show full text]
  • The 'Yard Stick' to Interpret the Entropy of Activation in Chemical Kinetics
    World Journal of Chemical Education, 2018, Vol. 6, No. 1, 78-81 Available online at http://pubs.sciepub.com/wjce/6/1/12 ©Science and Education Publishing DOI:10.12691/wjce-6-1-12 The ‘Yard Stick’ to Interpret the Entropy of Activation in Chemical Kinetics: A Physical-Organic Chemistry Exercise R. Sanjeev1, D. A. Padmavathi2, V. Jagannadham2,* 1Department of Chemistry, Geethanjali College of Engineering and Technology, Cheeryal-501301, Telangana, India 2Department of Chemistry, Osmania University, Hyderabad-500007, India *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract No physical or physical-organic chemistry laboratory goes without a single instrument. To measure conductance we use conductometer, pH meter for measuring pH, colorimeter for absorbance, viscometer for viscosity, potentiometer for emf, polarimeter for angle of rotation, and several other instruments for different physical properties. But when it comes to the turn of thermodynamic or activation parameters, we don’t have any meters. The only way to evaluate all the thermodynamic or activation parameters is the use of some empirical equations available in many physical chemistry text books. Most often it is very easy to interpret the enthalpy change and free energy change in thermodynamics and the corresponding activation parameters in chemical kinetics. When it comes to interpretation of change of entropy or change of entropy of activation, more often it frightens than enlightens a new teacher while teaching and the students while learning. The classical thermodynamic entropy change is well explained by Atkins [1] in terms of a sneeze in a busy street generates less additional disorder than the same sneeze in a quiet library (Figure 1) [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Tables of Rate Constants for Gas Phase Chemical Reactions of Sulfur Compounds (1971-1979)
    NBSIR 80-2118 Tables of Rate Constants for Gas Phase Chemical Reactions of Sulfur Compounds (1971-1979) Francis Westley Chemical Kinetics Division Center for Thermodynamics and Molecular Science National Measurement Laboratory National Bureau of Standards U.S. Department of Commerce Washington. D.C. 20234 July 1980 Interim Report Prepared for Morgantown Energy Technology Center Department of Energy Morgantown, West Virginia 26505 Fice of Standard Reference Data itional Bureau of Standards ashington, D.C. 20234 c, 2 Jl 1 m * rational bureau 07 STANDARDS LIBRARY NBSIR 80-2118 wov 2 4 1980 TABLES OF RATE CONSTANTS FOR GAS f)Oi Clcc -Ore PHASE CHEMICAL REACTIONS OF SULFUR COMPOUNDS (1971-1979) 1 5 (o lo-z im Francis Westley Chemical Kinetics Division Center for Thermodynamics and Molecular Science National Measurement Laboratory National Bureau of Standards U.S. Department of Commerce Washington, D.C. 20234 July 1980 Interim Report Prepared for Morgantown Energy Technology Center Department of Energy Morgantown, West Virginia 26505 and Office of Standard Reference Data National Bureau of Standards Washington, D.C. 20234 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Philip M. Klutznick, Secretary Luther H. Hodges, Jr., Deputy Secretary Jordan J. Baruch, Assistant Secretary for Productivity, Technology, and Innovation NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS. Ernest Ambler, Director . i:i : a 1* V'.OTf in. te- ?') t aa.‘ .1 J Table of Contents Abstract 1 Introduction 2 Guidelines for the User 4 Table of Arrhenius Parameters for Chemical Reactions of Sulfur Compounds 12 Reactions of: S(Sulfur atom) 12 $2(Sulfur dimer) 20 S0(Sulfur monoxide) 21 S02(Sulfur dioxide 23 S0 (Sulfur trioxide) 28 3 S20(Sul fur oxide^O) ) 29 SH (Mercapto free radical) 29 H2S (Hydroqen sulfide 31 CS (Carbon monosulfide free radical) 32 CS2 (Carbon disulfide) 33 COS (Carbon oxide sulfide) 35 CH^S* ( Methyl thio free radical) 36 CH^SH (Methanethiol ) 36 cy-CF^CF^S (Thiirane) 37 CH^SCF^* (Methyl, (methyl thio)-, free radical) ...
    [Show full text]
  • Classical and Modern Methods in Reaction Rate Theory
    J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92, 3711-3725 3711 loss associated with the transition between states is offset by a For the Re( MQ+)-based complexes an additional complication gain in energy in the intramolecular vibrations (eq 3). to intramolecular electron transfer exists arising from a "flattening" On the other hand, if (AGe,,2 + A0,2) > (AG,,l + A,,,) (Figure of the relative orientations of the two rings of the MQ+ ligand 4B) and nuclear tunneling effects in the librational modes are when it accepts an However, the analysis presented unimportant, intramolecular electron transfer can not occur in here does provide a general explanation for the role of free energy a frozen environment. The situation is the same as in Figure 3A. change in environments where dipole motions are restricted. For Even direct Re(1) - MQ' excitation (process a in Figure 4B) a directed, intramolecular electron transfer such as reaction 1, must either lead to the ground state by emission or to the Re- the change in electronic distribution between states will, in general, (11)-bpy'--based MLCT state by reverse electron transfer: lead to a difference between Ao,l and A0,2. This difference creates a solvent dipole barrier to intramolecular electron transfer. It [ (bpy)Re"(CO) 3( MQ')] 2+* -+ (bpy'-)Re"( CO) 3(MQ')] 2'* follows from eq 4 that if light-induced electron transfer is to occur (5) in a frozen environment, the difference in solvent reorganizational The inversion in the sense of the electron transfer in the frozen energy, A& = bS2- A,,, must be compensated for by a favorable environment is induced energetically by the greater solvent re- free energy change, A(AG) = - AGes,l,as organizational energy for the lower excited state, A0,2 > Ao,l - Aces,~- AGes.2 > Ao-2 - &,I (AGes,2 - AGes,l)* or In a macroscopic sample, a distribution of solvent dipole en- vironments exists around the assembly of ground states.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Terms Used in Photochemistry, 3Rd Edition (IUPAC
    Pure Appl. Chem., Vol. 79, No. 3, pp. 293–465, 2007. doi:10.1351/pac200779030293 © 2007 IUPAC INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY ORGANIC AND BIOMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY DIVISION* SUBCOMMITTEE ON PHOTOCHEMISTRY GLOSSARY OF TERMS USED IN PHOTOCHEMISTRY 3rd EDITION (IUPAC Recommendations 2006) Prepared for publication by S. E. BRASLAVSKY‡ Max-Planck-Institut für Bioanorganische Chemie, Postfach 10 13 65, 45413 Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany *Membership of the Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry Division Committee during the preparation of this re- port (2003–2006) was as follows: President: T. T. Tidwell (1998–2003), M. Isobe (2002–2005); Vice President: D. StC. Black (1996–2003), V. T. Ivanov (1996–2005); Secretary: G. M. Blackburn (2002–2005); Past President: T. Norin (1996–2003), T. T. Tidwell (1998–2005) (initial date indicates first time elected as Division member). The list of the other Division members can be found in <http://www.iupac.org/divisions/III/members.html>. Membership of the Subcommittee on Photochemistry (2003–2005) was as follows: S. E. Braslavsky (Germany, Chairperson), A. U. Acuña (Spain), T. D. Z. Atvars (Brazil), C. Bohne (Canada), R. Bonneau (France), A. M. Braun (Germany), A. Chibisov (Russia), K. Ghiggino (Australia), A. Kutateladze (USA), H. Lemmetyinen (Finland), M. Litter (Argentina), H. Miyasaka (Japan), M. Olivucci (Italy), D. Phillips (UK), R. O. Rahn (USA), E. San Román (Argentina), N. Serpone (Canada), M. Terazima (Japan). Contributors to the 3rd edition were: A. U. Acuña, W. Adam, F. Amat, D. Armesto, T. D. Z. Atvars, A. Bard, E. Bill, L. O. Björn, C. Bohne, J. Bolton, R. Bonneau, H.
    [Show full text]
  • Eyring Activation Energy Analysis of Acetic Anhydride Hydrolysis in Acetonitrile Cosolvent Systems Nathan Mitchell East Tennessee State University
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2018 Eyring Activation Energy Analysis of Acetic Anhydride Hydrolysis in Acetonitrile Cosolvent Systems Nathan Mitchell East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Analytical Chemistry Commons Recommended Citation Mitchell, Nathan, "Eyring Activation Energy Analysis of Acetic Anhydride Hydrolysis in Acetonitrile Cosolvent Systems" (2018). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3430. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3430 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Eyring Activation Energy Analysis of Acetic Anhydride Hydrolysis in Acetonitrile Cosolvent Systems ________________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of Chemistry East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Chemistry ______________________ by Nathan Mitchell May 2018 _____________________ Dr. Dane Scott, Chair Dr. Greg Bishop Dr. Marina Roginskaya Keywords: Thermodynamic Analysis, Hydrolysis, Linear Solvent Energy Relationships, Cosolvent Systems, Acetonitrile ABSTRACT Eyring Activation Energy Analysis of Acetic Anhydride Hydrolysis in Acetonitrile Cosolvent Systems by Nathan Mitchell Acetic anhydride hydrolysis in water is considered a standard reaction for investigating activation energy parameters using cosolvents. Hydrolysis in water/acetonitrile cosolvent is monitored by measuring pH vs. time at temperatures from 15.0 to 40.0 °C and mole fraction of water from 1 to 0.750.
    [Show full text]
  • Eyring Equation and the Second Order Rate Law: Overcoming a Paradox
    Eyring equation and the second order rate law: Overcoming a paradox L. Bonnet∗ CNRS, Institut des Sciences Mol´eculaires, UMR 5255, 33405, Talence, France Univ. Bordeaux, Institut des Sciences Mol´eculaires, UMR 5255, 33405, Talence, France (Dated: March 8, 2016) The standard transition state theory (TST) of bimolecular reactions was recently shown to lead to a rate law in disagreement with the expected second order rate law [Bonnet L., Rayez J.-C. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2010, 110, 2355]. An alternative derivation was proposed which allows to overcome this paradox. This derivation allows to get at the same time the good rate law and Eyring equation for the rate constant. The purpose of this paper is to provide rigorous and convincing theoretical arguments in order to strengthen these developments and improve their visibility. I. INTRODUCTION A classic result of first year chemistry courses is that for elementary bimolecular gas-phase reactions [1] of the type A + B −→ P roducts, (1) the time-evolution of the concentrations [A] and [B] is given by the second order rate law d[A] − = K[A][B], (2) dt where K is the rate constant. For reactions proceeding through a barrier along the reaction path, Eyring famous equation [2] allows the estimation of K with a considerable success for more than 80 years [3]. This formula is the central result of activated complex theory [2], nowadays called transition state theory (TST) [3–18]. Note that other researchers than Eyring made seminal contributions to the theory at about the same time [3], like Evans and Polanyi [4], Wigner [5, 6], Horiuti [7], etc..
    [Show full text]
  • Empirical Chemical Kinetics
    Empirical Chemical Kinetics time dependence of reactant and product concentrations e.g. for A + 2B → 3C + D d[A] 1 d[B] 1 d[C] d[D] rate =− =− = = d2d3ddtttt =ν In general, a chemical equation is 0∑ ii R i nt()− n (0 ) The extent of a reaction (the advancement) = ii ν i For an infinitesmal advancement dξ each reactant/product =ν ξ concentration changes by d[Ri ]i d . d1d[R]ξ By definition, the rate == i ν ddtti Reaction rates usually depend on reactant concentrations, e.g., rate= k [A]xy [B] order in B total order = x+y rate constant In elementary reaction steps the orders are always integral, but they may not be so in multi-step reactions. The molecularity is the number of molecules in a reaction step. Rate Laws d[A] Zero order: −=k dt 0 [A] = [A]00 -[A]t kt [A]0 t1 = 2 2k 0 0 t −=d[A] First order: k1[A] [A] ln[A] dt − = kt1 [A]t [A]0 e ln 2 0 t 0 t t1 = 2 k1 d[A] 2 Second order: −=2[A]k [A] dt 2 [A] [A] = 0 t + 12[A]kt20 0 t -1=+ -1 [A]t [A]02 2kt 1 t1 = 2 2[A]k20 [A]-1 0 t Second-order Kinetics: Two Reactants A + B k → products da rate=− =kab a = [A], b =[B] dt =− − ka()()00 x b x ddxa Since aa=− x, =− 0 ddtt dx So =−ka()() x b − x dt 00 x dx kt = ∫ ()()−− 0 axbx00 −111x =−dx ()−−−∫ ()() ab000 ax 0 bx 0 −1 ab = ln 0 ()− ab00 ab 0 or more usefully, aa=+−0 ln ln ()abkt00 bb0 Data Analysis “Classical” methods of data analysis are often useful to explore the order of reactions, or to display the results (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinetics and Atmospheric Chemistry
    12/9/2017 Kinetics and Atmospheric Chemistry Edward Dunlea, Jose-Luis Jimenez Atmospheric Chemistry CHEM-5151/ATOC-5151 Required reading: Finlayson-Pitts and Pitts Chapter 5 Recommended reading: Jacob, Chapter 9 Other reading: Seinfeld and Pandis 3.5 General Outline of Next 3 Lectures • Intro = General introduction – Quick review of thermodynamics • Finlayson-Pitts & Pitts, Chapter 5 A. Fundamental Principles of Gas-Phase Kinetics B. Laboratory Techniques for Determining Absolute Rate Constants for Gas-Phase Reactions C. Laboratory Techniques for Determining Relative Rate Constants for Gas-Phase Reactions D. Reactions in Solution E. Laboratory Techniques for Studying Heterogeneous Reactions F. Compilations of Kinetic Data for Atmospheric Reactions 1 12/9/2017 Kinetics and Atmospheric Chemistry • What we’re doing here… – Photochemistry already covered – We will cover gas phase kinetics and heterogeneous reactions – Introductions to a few techniques used for measuring kinetic parameters • What kind of information do we hope to get out of “atmospheric kinetics”? – Predictive ability over species emitted into atmosphere • Which reactions will actually proceed to products? • Which products will they form? • How long will emitted species remain before they react? Competition with photolysis, wash out, etc. • Pare down list of thousands of possible reactions to the ones that really matter – Aiming towards idea practical predictive abilities • Use look up tables to decide if reaction is likely to proceed and determine an “atmospheric lifetime”
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic NMR Experiments: -Dr
    Determining the Energy of Activation Parameters from Dynamic NMR Experiments: -Dr. Rich Shoemaker (Source: Dynamic NMR Spectroscopy by J. Sandstöm, and me) • The results contained in this document have been published: o Zimmer, Shoemaker, & Ruminski, Inorganica Chimica Acta, 359(2006) 1478-1484 The most common (and oft inaccurate) method of determining activation energy parameters is through the determination (often estimation) of temperature at which the NMR resonances of 2 exchanging species coalesce. The coalescence temperature (Tc) is then used in conjunction with the maximum peak separation in the low-temperature (i.e. slow-exchange) limit (∆ν in Hz). The biggest source of error using the method of coalescence is (1) accurately determining Tc and (2) accurately determining ∆ν. Often, the isotropic chemical shifts of the exchanging species are temperature dependent, so ∆ν changes with temperature. If this happens, then the error in estimation of the activation energy barrier (∆G‡) can be very large. k The rate constant (k ) in these calculations, for nearly all NMR exchange 1 r A B situations, is actually k1+k2 in a system for A exchanging with B, where: k2 The equation to estimate ∆G‡ using the coalescence temperature is: ‡ Tc -3 ∆G = aT 9.972 + log where a = 4.575 x 10 for units of kcal/mol ∆ν a = 1.914 x 10-2 for units of kJ/mol Note: at the coalescence temperature, kc = π∆υ/√2 A second common method of determining the energy of activation (Ea) is by performing an Arrhenius Plot. If one knows the exchange rate constant (kr) at several temperatures (always in Kelvin), one can plot ln(k) vs.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Determination of the Reaction Rate Constant and Selectivity in Gas and Liquid-Phase Organic Reactions: Temperature and Solvent Effects
    On the Determination of the Reaction Rate Constant and Selectivity in Gas and Liquid-Phase Organic Reactions: Temperature and Solvent Effects Aikaterini Diamanti A thesis submitted for the Doctor of Philosophy degree of Imperial College London and the Diploma of Imperial College. Centre for Process Systems Engineering Department of Chemical Engineering Imperial College London London SW7 2AZ United Kingdom 9th December 2016 Declaration of Originality I, Aikaterini Diamanti, certify that this thesis, and the research to which it refers, are the product of my own work, and that any ideas or quotations from the work of other people, published or otherwise, are fully acknowledged in accordance with the standard referencing practices of the discipline. Copyright The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives licence. Researchers are free to copy, distribute or transmit the thesis on the condition that they attribute it, that they do not use it for commercial purposes and that they do not alter, transform or build upon it. For any reuse or distribution, researchers must make clear to others the licence terms of this work. 2 Abstract Chemical reactions occur abundantly in nature and the rates at which they proceed are critically influenced by factors such as the temperature and the solvent medium in which they take place. These two factors do not only affect the rate of the reaction but may also have a significant impact on other metrics, such as the selectivity and the catalytic activity, as well as on the overall performance of a process application.
    [Show full text]