Underwater Photographic Reconnaissance and Habitat Data Collection in the Florida Keys—A Procedure for Ground Truthing Remotely Sensed Bathymetric Data

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Underwater Photographic Reconnaissance and Habitat Data Collection in the Florida Keys—A Procedure for Ground Truthing Remotely Sensed Bathymetric Data Underwater Photographic Reconnaissance and Habitat Data Collection in the Florida Keys—A Procedure for Ground Truthing Remotely Sensed Bathymetric Data Open-File Report 2020–1118 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Photographic reconnaissance setup at Turtle Rocks, Florida Keys, Florida. Photograph by Zachery Fehr. Underwater Photographic Reconnaissance and Habitat Data Collection in the Florida Keys—A Procedure for Ground Truthing Remotely Sensed Bathymetric Data By Zachery W. Fehr and Kimberly K. Yates Open-File Report 2020–1118 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2020 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Fehr, Z.W., and Yates, K.K., 2020, Underwater photographic reconnaissance and habitat data collection in the Florida Keys—A procedure for ground truthing remotely sensed bathymetric data: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2020–1118, 13 p., https://doi.org/ 10.3133/ ofr20201118. ISSN 2331-1258 (online) iii Acknowledgments We thank Stephanie Arsenault, Mitch Lemon, and Nathan Smiley of the U.S. Geological Survey for their assistance in developing and refining the procedures outlined in this report. They also provided much-appreciated aid in fieldwork preparation and operations. We also thank Ilsa Kuffner for developing the Recon Dive Habitat Sheet. This work was funded through the 2018 U.S. Geological Survey Hurricane and Wildfire Supplemental Funding. Data were collected under Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary permit FKNMS-2016-068. v Contents Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................................iii Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1 Methods...........................................................................................................................................................2 Materials ................................................................................................................................................2 Site Determination ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������2 Photographic Operations ....................................................................................................................2 Site and Reference Preparation ................................................................................................2 Nadir Imagery ...............................................................................................................................3 Cardinal Direction Imagery ........................................................................................................4 Supplemental Imagery ................................................................................................................5 Habitat Sheet Data Collection ............................................................................................................9 Photograph Metadata ..........................................................................................................................9 Discussion .....................................................................................................................................................11 References Cited..........................................................................................................................................13 Figures 1. Map showing the ten “hot spot” sites chosen for Turtle Rocks, Florida Keys, Florida; the location is shown in the inset map .......................................................................3 2. Underwater photograph of the dive slate (showing “Turtle Rock site 7”) which was used to demarcate the beginning of the series of photographs taken at Turtle Rocks site 7 on the camera’s chronologically ordered secure digital (SD) card ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������4 3. Photograph of an example nadir shot at Turtle Rocks site 7 �������������������������������������������������5 4. Photograph of the tripod and reference rod setup at Turtle Rocks site 7 ...........................6 5. Photographs showing cardinal direction viewpoints at Turtle Rocks site 7 (A, C, E, G) with the reference dive slate and (B, D, F, H) without the reference dive slate .......7 6. Photograph (a macro shot) of seafloor sediment alongside a reference ruler at Turtle Rocks site 7 .........................................................................................................................8 7. Photograph showing sediment accretion around a gorgonian coral species found at Crocker Reef site 3 (A) before sediment removal from the holdfast and (B) after sediment removal from the holdfast ..........................................................................9 8. Digital image of the completed “Ecosystem Processes Impacting Coastal Change (EPIC) Recon Dive Habitat Sheet” for Turtle Rocks site 7 .....................................10 Table 1. List of fields associated with image P3311661.JPG (fig. 5A) in the photograph metadata ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������11 vi Conversion Factors U.S. customary units to International System of Units Multiply By To obtain Length inch (in.) 2.54 centimeter (cm) inch (in.) 25.4 millimeter (mm) foot (ft) 0.3048 meter (m) mile (mi) 1.609 kilometer (km) mile, nautical (nmi) 1.852 kilometer (km) yard (yd) 0.9144 meter (m) International System of Units to U.S. customary units Multiply By To obtain Length centimeter (cm) 0.3937 inch (in.) millimeter (mm) 0.03937 inch (in.) meter (m) 3.281 foot (ft) kilometer (km) 0.6214 mile (mi) kilometer (km) 0.5400 mile, nautical (nmi) meter (m) 1.094 yard (yd) Datum Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83). vii Abbreviations cm centimeter DEM digital elevation model E east EST Eastern Standard Time EXIF exchangeable image file format FAN field activity number GPS Global Positioning System ID identification JPG Joint Photographic Experts Group lidar light detection and ranging m meter N north n/a not applicable NAD83 North American Datum of 1983 ORF Olympus Raw Format S south SAV submerged aquatic vegetation SD secure digital SOP standard operating procedure sRGB standard Red Green Blue USGS U.S. Geological Survey W west % percent Underwater Photographic Reconnaissance and Habitat Data Collection in the Florida Keys—A Procedure for Ground Truthing Remotely Sensed Bathymetric Data By Zachery W. Fehr1 and Kimberly K. Yates2 for 7 million U.S. citizens and nearly 200 million coastal Abstract residents around the world (Ferrario and others, 2014). Major erosion and degradation of coral reefs and adjacent shallow Bathymetric geoprocessing analyses of the Florida Reef seafloor habitats are projected in the future due to a variety Tract have provided insights into trends of seafloor accretion of anthropogenic activities, placing the functions of these and seafloor erosion over time and following major storm essential ecosystems at risk (Fox and Caldwell, 2006; Madin events. However, bathymetric surveys sometimes capture and Connolly, 2006; Manzello and others, 2008; Burke and manmade structures and vegetation, which do not represent the others, 2011; Graham and others, 2015; and Yates and others, desired bare-earth data. Therefore, ground truthing is essential 2017). In addition to sea level rise, this erosion is accelerating to maintain the most accurate bathymetric data possible. the increase in water depth in these ecosystems (Yates and Field procedures were developed in the Florida Reef Tract in others, 2017), which further reduces the effectiveness of coral order to quickly and accurately collect consistent imagery and reefs in dissipating wave energy (Ferrario and others, 2014). habitat data across variable sites. Areas of significant elevation By using light detection and ranging (lidar) and change were determined through elevation change analyses; multibeam bathymetry surveys together with regional-scale these areas were targeted for ground truthing in order to check geoprocessing analyses, Yates and others (2017) quantified the reliability of the surveys. This report outlines the standard these effects in coral reef
Recommended publications
  • Die Expedition ANT-XXIX/7 Punta Arenas - Kapstadt Wochenberichte 14
    Die Expedition ANT-XXIX/7 Punta Arenas - Kapstadt Wochenberichte 14. - 18. August 2013: Aufbruch in den antarktischen Winter 19. - 25. August 2013: Ungeplanter Zwischenstopp auf den Falklandinseln 26. August - 1. September 2013: Auf dem Weg ins Eis 2. - 8. September 2013: Unser erstes Eis-Camp 9. - 15. September 2013: Der Weg gen Osten 16. - 22. September 2013: Das zweite Eiscamp 23. - 30. September 2013: Ein Tag auf der Scholle 30. September - 6. Oktober 2013: Eine turbulente Woche 7. - 13. Oktober 2013: Eine Expedition geht zu Ende Kurzbericht 14. August - 16. Oktober 2013, Punta Arenas - Kapstadt Die Expedition ANT-XXIX-7 „WISKY“ (Winter Sea Ice Study on Key species) startet am 14. August 2013 in Punta Arenas, Chile, und endet am 16. Oktober 2013 in Kapstadt, Südafrika. 51 Wissenschaftler und Techniker aus 9 Ländern werden an Bord sein. Der Hauptschwerpunkt der Fahrt befasst sich mit den Untersuchungen zur Kondition von antarktischem Krill, Euphausia superba in der Schottischen See, in Relation zu biologischen und physikalischen Gegebenheiten im offenen Wasser sowie in Regionen mit unterschiedlich intensiver Meereisbedeckung während der Übergangsphase vom antarktischen Winter zum Frühjahr. Expeditionen im antarktischen Winter werden aufgrund der widrigen Eisbedingungen sehr selten durchgeführt, so dass nur wenige wissenschaftliche Daten aus dieser Jahreszeit vorhanden sind. Daher wird als weiterer Schwerpunkt der Expedition auf dem Weg ins Eis sein die Biologie, Chemie und Physik der winterlichen Wassersäule zu erforschen. Mittels interdisziplinärer Prozessstudien soll die mechanistische Beziehung zwischen der winterlichen Meereisbedeckung und der Kondition des Krill (speziell seiner Larvenstadien) sowie anderer dominanter Organismen, die mit dem Meereis assoziiert sind, erforscht werden. Die Expedition soll entscheidend dazu beitragen die Auswirkungen eines Rückgangs der winterlichen Meereisbedeckung auf die Krillpopulation zu quantifizieren.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT OFOPERATIONSILENTANZAC Peter Briggs Terence Roach Tim Smith Name
    Report REPORT OF OPERATION SILENT ANZAC MARITIME ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF HMAS AE2 Name Position Prepared Tim Smith Maritime Archaeologist By: Approved Terence Roach Director of Operations By: Authorised Peter Briggs Chairman AE2CF By: 1 KEY OUTCOMES 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 REPORT OF OPERATION SILENT ANZAC 14 ANNEX A - PROJECT BACKGROUND, PREVIOUS WORK 54 ANNEX B - PROJECT DEVELOPMENT, SIA ACTIVITY 58 ANNEX C - TEAM MEMBERS 62 ANNEX D - SPONSORS 64 ANNEX E - CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT 66 Appendix 1 to ANNEX E - Physical Oceanography 10SEP07 91 Appendix 2 to ANNEX E - Site stabilisation post MAA 94 ANNEX F – ROV, DROP CAMERA & SEABED PENETROMETER 98 Appendix 1 to ANNEX F - Drop Camera Inspection 136 ANNEX G – STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 146 Appendix 1 to ANNEX G - Sample Sites 152 ANNEX H - UPDATE TO THE RISK – UNEXPLODED TORPEDO 154 Appendix 1 to ANNEX H - Risk Tree 161 Appendix 2 to ANNEX H - Water Penetration into the Torpedo 162 2 KEY OUTCOMES • The objectives of the MAA were achieved. • The submarine is lying in a low corrosion environment. • The pressure hull is in a good state of preservation though a more detailed survey would be required to both confirm this impression and support full scale recovery. • Before either moving or raising additional data would be required. • The remaining torpedo must be located and the risk from its warhead removed before any effort to move the submarine is made. • The casing and fin have suffered significant deterioration arising from corrosion and impact by nets and anchors. • Development of options for future management is now proceeding. • The joint workshop in Istanbul in April 2008 is intended to provide a recommended way ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Menu Preprint & Formats
    STEVEN S. LONG Predators An Enemies Book for Dark Champions Author: Steven S. Long Editing & Development: Allen Th omas Layout & Graphic Design: Andy Mathews Cover Illustration: Andy Mathews Interior Illustration: Manuel Calderon, Storn Cook, Dominika Klosowicz, Derrick Th omas, Maria van Bruggen SPECIAL THANKS First, special thanks to Christoph Schütt (for help translating names and terms into German) and S. John Ross (for the chili recipe). Second, we’d also like to thank the Digital Hero playtest- ers and testreaders who reviewed the Predators manuscript and helped us correct typos and check the math. It would be a crime not to give you the thanks you deserve — you’re all heroes! Hero SystemTM ® is DOJ, Inc.’s trademark for its roleplaying system. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, Hero System © 1984, 1989, 2002 by DOJ, Inc. d/b/a Hero Games. All rights reserved. electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or computerization, or by Champions © 1984, 1989, 2002 by DOJ, Inc. d/b/a Hero Games. All rights reserved. any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Fantasy Hero © 2003 by DOJ, Inc. d/b/a Hero Games. All rights reserved. Publisher: DOJ, Inc., 1 Haight Street, Suite A, San Francisco, California 94102. Predators © 2005 by DOJ, Inc. d/b/a Hero Games. All rights reserved. Printed in the Canada. First printing July 2005 Star Hero, Justice Inc., Danger International, Dark Champions, Pulp Hero, Produced and distributed by DOJ, Inc. d/b/a Hero Games.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Affairs Undergoes Resbucturing
    THE The Independent Newspaper Serving Notre Dame and Saint Mary's VOLUME 41: ISSUE 117 FRIDAY, APRIL 13 2007 NDSMCOBSERVER.COM Student Affairs undergoes resbucturing SBPDunits Coughlin promoted to assistant vice president, Poorman reassigns departments to supervisors respond to departments under the tape. The SAO had previous­ branches, Student Activities By MARCELA BERRIOS Division's umbrella to differ­ ly fallen under the jurisdic­ for Programming and Associate News Editor ent supervisors, including tion of Division Assistant Student Activities for traffic block Coughlin. Vice President David Moss, Facilities. Peggy Hnatusko The Division of Student "Brian is a gifted, experi­ who also supervised the and Ryan Willerton, associ­ Affairs began restructuring enced and astute adminis­ Office of Drug and Alcohol ate directors of Student Driver abandons car, its chain of command trator who has Jed the Education (ODAE). Activities, were also promot­ prompts manhunt Thursday with the Student Activities Office "These changes can be ed Thursday to head the announcement of the promo­ through a period of substan­ seen as an acknowledgement Programming and the tion of director of the tial growth over the last six of the SAO's expansion and Facilities divisions, respec­ By KAITLYNN RIELY Student Activities Office years," Father Mark growth in the last six years tively. Assistant News Editor (SAO) and LaFortune Student Poorman, vice president of and the staff's continued "This model is consistent Center, Brian Coughlin, to Student Affairs, said in a hard work and commit­ with other student activities the recently created position press release. ment," Coughlin said. ''I'm structures at major universi­ Several South Bend police units of assistant vice president of Coughlin will continue to excited about the new orga­ ties across the country, and surrounded an area near the 800 Student Activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Archaeological Site Survey Huis Te Warmelo 1708-1715. Fieldwork Report 2017-2018
    Maritime archaeological site survey Huis te Warmelo 1708-1715. Fieldwork report 2017-2018 Maili Roio, Immi Wallin, Kari Hyttinen Helsinki-Tallinn 2019 Summary Subzone Oy conducted during the summer 2017 and 2018 an archaeological survey of the wreck of the North Holland Admiralty’s frigate Huis te Warmelo located 1 nautical mile West from Kalbådagrund lighthouse, Porvoo, Gulf of Finland. Lat 59° 59,2089' Lon 25° 33,6103' (ETRS89/WGS84). The main goal was to continue the production of 3D model of the wreck, that has register number 2381 in the Finnish Cultural Heritage Agency’s Registry of Ancient Monuments. The name in the register is Huis te Warmelo. Other names used of the wreck are Frigate of Porvoo and Kalbådagrund Gunship. Earlier research conducted by Subzone Oy in 2016, confirmed the identity of the wreck. In 2017 and 2018 only few documentation dives could be made to the wreck. The main results were documentation of the main and mizzen masts and additions to the 3D model of the main deck of the wreck. 2 Content Summary ................................................................................................................ 2 Content ................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction............................................................................................................. 4 Technical data .................................................................................................... 5 Field work ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coral Reef Restoration Toolkit a Field-Oriented Guide Developed in the Seychelles Islands
    Coral Reef Restoration Toolkit A Field-Oriented Guide Developed in the Seychelles Islands EDITED BY SARAH FRIAS-TORRES, PHANOR H MONTOYA-MAYA, AND NIRMAL SHAH A. DUNAND i Coral Reef Restoration Toolkit A Field-Oriented Guide Developed in the Seychelles Islands Editors Sarah Frias-Torres 1,2,3, Phanor H Montoya-Maya 1, 4, Nirmal Shah 1 1 Nature Seychelles, The Centre for Environment & Education, Roche Caiman, Mahe, Republic of Seychelles 2 Smithsonian Marine Station, 701 Seaway Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34949 USA 3 Vulcan Inc., 505 5th Avenue South, Seattle WA 98104 USA 4 Corales de Paz, Calle 4 No. 35A-51, Cali, Colombia Contributors Paul Anstey, Nature Seychelles, Republic of Seychelles Gilles-David Derand, BirdLife International, La Reunion (France) Calum Ferguson, Republic of Seychelles Sarah Frias-Torres, Nature Seychelles, Republic of Seychelles Joseph Marlow, Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand Paul McCann, Trojan Diving Services, Australia Phanor H Montoya-Maya, Nature Seychelles, Republic of Seychelles / Corales de Paz, Colombia Claude Reveret, CREOCEAN, France Katherine Rowe, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Saudi Arabia Chloe Shute, Nature Seychelles, Republic of Seychelles Derek Soto, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico Acknowledgements Expert advice from several colleagues has aided the development of the Toolkit. We particularly thank Kaylee Smit and Sofie Klaus-Caan for their helpful and constructive reviews. This Tookit was tested on a live audience attending the first Reef Rescuers Training Program in Coral Reef Restoration at Nature Seychelles, Praslin, Republic of Seychelles in June-August 2015. The authors would like to acknowledge the participants for their contributions to early drafts of this Toolkit: Danielle M Becker, Tamsen T Byfield, Austin Laing-Herbert, Louise Malaise, Ron Kirby Bugay Manit, and Tess Moriarty.
    [Show full text]
  • Coral Reef Restoration Toolkit a Field-Oriented Guide Developed in the Seychelles Islands
    Coral Reef Restoration Toolkit A Field-Oriented Guide Developed in the Seychelles Islands EDITED BY SARAH FRIAS-TORRES, PHANOR H MONTOYA-MAYA, AND NIRMAL SHAH A. DUNAND i Coral Reef Restoration Toolkit A Field-Oriented Guide Developed in the Seychelles Islands Editors Sarah Frias-Torres 1,2,3, Phanor H Montoya-Maya 1, 4, Nirmal Shah 1 1 Nature Seychelles, The Centre for Environment & Education, Roche Caiman, Mahe, Republic of Seychelles 2 Smithsonian Marine Station, 701 Seaway Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34949 USA 3 Vulcan Inc., 505 5th Avenue South, Seattle WA 98104 USA 4 Corales de Paz, Calle 4 No. 35A-51, Cali, Colombia Contributors Paul Anstey, Nature Seychelles, Republic of Seychelles Gilles-David Derand, BirdLife International, La Reunion (France) Calum Ferguson, Republic of Seychelles Sarah Frias-Torres, Nature Seychelles, Republic of Seychelles Joseph Marlow, Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand Paul McCann, Trojan Diving Services, Australia Phanor H Montoya-Maya, Nature Seychelles, Republic of Seychelles / Corales de Paz, Colombia Claude Reveret, CREOCEAN, France Katherine Rowe, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Saudi Arabia Chloe Shute, Nature Seychelles, Republic of Seychelles Derek Soto, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico Acknowledgements Expert advice from several colleagues has aided the development of the Toolkit. We particularly thank Kaylee Smit and Sofie Klaus-Caan for their helpful and constructive reviews. This Tookit was tested on a live audience attending the first Reef Rescuers Training Program in Coral Reef Restoration at Nature Seychelles, Praslin, Republic of Seychelles in June-August 2015. The authors would like to acknowledge the participants for their contributions to early drafts of this Toolkit: Danielle M Becker, Tamsen T Byfield, Austin Laing-Herbert, Louise Malaise, Ron Kirby Bugay Manit, Tess Moriarty.
    [Show full text]
  • County Budgetat • FREEHOLD-The Board of Freeholders Yesterday Adopted Them
    OiitHbofibn MONMOUTH COUNTY'S HOME NEWSPAPER FOR 87 YEARS DIAL 741-0010 U M VOL. 87, NO. 165 " **£• OIUI fame*-. WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 17, 1965. 7c PER COPY PAG* ONE 4Un« oaiOM County Budgetat • FREEHOLD-The Board of Freeholders yesterday adopted them. The 1965 tax rate is «et at 45.9 cents per $100 of assessed Seven cents,surplus revenue,and - • -••• correctional. and penal requirements this year amounts to * tecord J13,19B,O82 budget for Monmouth County. valuation. last' year, it was 45.3 cents. —Four cents, from the state aid motor vehicle fund. $5,613,546. Last year's figure of $5,232,369.25 has been raised At a public hearipg, board members disclosed that this The reason-for the small change in rate can be found in Charitable, correction and penal institutions will get the by $381,156.75. - ' •mount is $1,015,215 more than that of the $12,182,867 county the ratables boost due to the boom still being experienced largest bits of the budget dollar this year, with an appropria- Increased rates fixed by the state institutions in which total lor 0M4. in construction of houses, commercial areas and industries. tion of 43 cents. Roads .and bridges come next at 16 cents. county patients are maintained is one cause for the jump in The amount to be raised by taxation this year is $18,470,- DOLLAR BREAKDOWN , ' Following in order art judiciary, 8 cents; debt service, 7 Monmouth! In this section, requirements are established for 702, an Increase ot $830,495 over 1964's budget figure of $9,640,- The 1965 county budget dollar will be broken down this cents; general government, 7 cents; regulation, 7 cents; ed- the Welfare Board administration, old age assistance, perma- J07.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Clips December 29, 2014
    Buffalo Sabres Daily Press Clips December 29, 2014 Sabres rally to beat Islanders 4-3 in SO By Nick Mendola Associated Press December 27, 2014 BUFFALO, N.Y. (AP) — Nicolas Deslauriers didn't even see his goal that ignited Buffalo's comeback victory over the New York Islanders on Saturday night. With Buffalo down 3-0 early in the third period, Deslauriers' wrister from the slot sailed through three Islanders before beating goalie Kevin Poulin. "I heard it hit the post," Deslauriers said. "But I saw (Drew) Stafford and (Brian) Flynn putting their hands up, so I put mine up." The goal was the first of three third-period goals in just over 5 minutes for Buffalo, and Tyler Ennis scored in a shootout to give the Sabres a 4-3 victory and snap a four-game skid. It was Deslauriers' fourth goal of the season, and his second in two games. He also added an assist on Zemgus Girgensons' short-handed goal. "I'm just putting the puck on net and getting lucky odd bounces," Deslauriers said. "I'm not a guy who looks at my stats like that. It's more about finishing my hits and if I get a chance to bury one, I'll do my best." Chris Stewart also scored, and Jhonas Enroth made 17 of his 33 saves in the third period and overtime. "I thought their goalie obviously elevated," Islanders coach Jack Capuano said. "I mean he was good tonight, but he made some big saves when he had to and that's what you need to do when you win hockey games." John Tavares scored twice, and Nick Leddy added a goal for the Islanders.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Archaeological Site Survey Huis Te Warmelo 1708-1715. Research Report
    Maritime archaeological site survey Huis te Warmelo 1708-1715. Research report Maili Roio, Immi Wallin Kari Hyttinen Helsinki-Tallinn 2017 Summary Subzone Oy conducted during the summer 2016 an archaeological survey of the shipwreck located 1 nautical mile West from Kalbådagrund lighthouse, Porvoo, Gulf of Finland. Lat 59° 59,2089' Lon 25° 33,6103' (ETRS89/WGS84). The main goal was to identify the wreck, that has register number 2381 in the Finnish National Board of Antiquities Registry of Ancient Monuments. The name in the register is Suomenlahti avomeri. Other names used of the wreck are Frigate of Porvoo and Kalbådagrund Gunship. Earlier archival research conducted by Subzone Oy in 2015, showed that the wreck is not a Russian nor Swedish man-of-war. The size of the wreck and the number of guns, as well as the location all together did not match to Russian or Swedish man-of-war that had sunk in the end of 17th century or during 18th century. One of the North Holland Admiralty warships, Huis te Warmelo, sunk at Kalbådagrund in 1715. The archival material of Huis te Warmelo, studied and collected by historian Peter Swart, was compared to the data collected during the research. The measurements, building style, guns, gun carriages, structures of the ship and location supported the assumption that the wreck is Huis te Warmelo. The research did not reveal any discrepancies that the ship wreck is Huis te Warmelo. Because no state loses 40 gun man-of-war without reports and marking in the archives, and no other warships sunk in the Gulf of Finland during end of 17th century and 18th century matches with the size, number of guns and location, we can be sure that the one that does match is the right one.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Irish & Uk Files on the Loss of the Aer Lingus
    REVIEW OF IRISH & UK FILES ON THE LOSS OF THE AER LINGUS VISCOUNT ST. PHELIM REGISTRATION EI-AOM ON 24 MARCH 1968 CONTENTS 1. Preface Page 3 2. Introduction Page 4 3. Aspects of The Crash Page 7 4. Format of Review Page 18 5. Comparison of Irish and UK Page 26 Material Search and Salvage 6. Financial Aspects Page 28 7. The Aircraft Page 31 a. Analysis of Maintenance b. Wreckage Analysis c. Removal of Wreckage 8. Witness Statements Page 44 9. New Witnesses Page 47 10. Missiles Page 48 11. Press and Media Page 57 1 12. ATC Tapes Page 59 13. Medical & Pathological Page 60 14. Warsaw Convention Page 61 15. Conclusions Page 63 16. Recommendations Page 67 17 ANNEXES A Chart B Operations Order C Search and Salvage D Aer Lingus Memo of 3 January 1968 E Aer Lingus Letter 3 January 1968 F Letter of F. Begley of 2 April 1968 G Report of interview with Mr R.W. O'Sullivan H Report of interview with Capt. PG McCabe and phone call to Mr J McStay I Copies of Inspection/Visit Chart No. 2 issue 2 of 10/3/1967 J V808 803 Inspection-Operating plan date 10/3/67 K Analysis of Viscount Maintenance Operating Plan M C of A renewal certificate and form N Questions Relatives L Answers – Irish O Answers – British 2 PREFACE The Aer Lingus Viscount St. Phelim, registration letters EI-AOM operating as Flight 712 from Cork to London crashed into the Irish Sea near the Tuskar Rock in County Wexford at approximately 12.15 hours local time on 24 March 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • Seabed Survey Licence (SSL) Activities Information Table What Requires an SSL from the Crown Estate?
    Seabed Survey Licence (SSL) Activities Information Table What requires an SSL from The Crown Estate? Type of Surveys Description Survey Techniques SSL required? Geophysical The collection of spatial data about the seabed from remote sensing Singlebeam bathymetry No water column systems Multibeam bathymetry remotely sensing Sidescan sonar Magnetometer RoxAnn Seismic profiling Ecological Marine mammal/bird observations from ship No Video/camera surveys in water column only Trawls out of the public right of fishing o e.g. benthic/bottom/demersal/pelagic Archaeological/ Wreck investigation Small scale in-situ survey or retrieval of archaeological artefacts from Divers No Non-intrusive survey predominantly water column or the seabed* by hand, access to dive site and non-intrusive seabed RoV access activities activities. Hand fanning of sediment Diver trails Diving shot line Marker buoys placed or recovered by hand Geophysical Seismic data acquisition Ocean bottom nodes Yes deployed on seabed Geotechnical/ The collection of engineering data to understand the behaviour and Cone penetration tests Yes Geological properties of the seabed Vibrocore and dropcore Bore hole Grab sampling Ecological/ The sampling of flora and fauna of the seabed. Grab sampling (hamon, day etc) Yes Habitat Mapping Core sampling CPODs/TPODs Passive acoustic monitoring Video deployment (on seabed) and camera Drop-down camera surveys (interacting with seabed) Met-Ocean The sampling of the meteorological and oceanographic climate of the Wave Buoy Yes sea Acoustic Doppler current profiler Tide gauge Floating LiDAR Archaeological/ Wreck further exploration and study Larger scale artefact retrieval where equipment is used to redistribute Airlifts and/or hydrolifts and, prop or water jet washing Yes More large scale movement that interferes with sediment or the activities are intrusive to the seabed.
    [Show full text]