DOCSLIB.ORG

UCSF Audiology Amplification Update XI

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UCSF Audiology Amplification Update XI Division of Audiology, Department of Otolaryngology University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine presents UCSF Audiology Amplification Update XI November 1– 2, 2013 Holiday Inn, Fisherman’s Wharf San Francisco, California Course Chair Robert W. Sweetow, PhD University of California, San Francisco University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine Acknowledgement of Commercial Support This CME activity was supported in part by educational grants from the following: Oticon, Inc Starkey Hearing Technologies Exhibitors Audiology Systems Inc. – an Otometrics partner CaptionCall Cochlear Americas Elite Hearing Network Health Care Instruments (HCI)/Audiometrics Fuel Medical Lyric by Phonak MED EL Neurotone Oticon Medical Oticon USA Phonak ReSound Siemens Hearing Instruments Starkey Hearing Technologies Unitron Widex Table of Contents Educational Objectives .......................................................................................................5 Accreditation .......................................................................................................................5 General Information ............................................................................................................6 Linguistic Competency Information .................................................................................. 7 Course Faculty ....................................................................................................................9 Disclosures ........................................................................................................................ 10 Course Program ................................................................................................................ 11 Friday, November 1, 2013 Evidence base for hearing aid features, the 'What, How ..........................................12 -30 and Why' of Technology Selection, Fitting, and Assessment J. Andrew "Drew" Dundas, PhD Evaluating New Technology ........................................................................................31 -57 Ruth Bentler, PhD Cochlear Implants: Where we’ve been; where we are ...............................................58 -70 Colleen Polite, AuD Basal Ganglia Neuromodulation for Tinnitus Suppression ...................................... 71-78 Steven W. Cheung, MD Saturday, November 2, 2013 Assessment and Interventions for Hearing Loss-related Fatigue ............................ 79-83 Benjamin W.Y. Hornsby, PhD Techniques and Challenges Related to Participation and ..................................... 84-103 Compliance with Aural Rehabilitation Robert W. Sweetow, PhD Pediatric Bone Anchored Implants: Protocols and Strategies ............................. 104-123 Lisa Christensen, AuD Registrant List .......................................................................................................... 124-126 University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine Presents UCSF Audiology Amplification Update XI This course is designed as a state-of-the-art course is designed as a state-of-the-art update of contemporary audiological practice, including evidence-based fitting and verification of hearing aids, pediatric use of bone anchored implants, listener effort and fatigue from amplification, as well as techniques and challenges associated with aural rehabilitation, tinnitus, and cochlear implants. Although it is intended as a course for practicing audiologists, professionals engaged in hearing aid dispensing, audiology graduate students, physicians, and others involved in the management of adults and children with hearing disorders will also benefit. The program consists of four primary components: lectures presented by renowned faculty from around the country, moderated question and answer periods at the conclusion of each morning and afternoon session, moderated panel discussions, and updates on new technology presented by manufacturer representatives. Educational Objectives An attendee completing this course will be able to: • Compare evidence-based research for current hearing aid fitting and verification; • Assess information regarding listener fatigue and how to minimize it; • Distinguish best practice guidelines for pediatric bone anchored implants; • Illustrate new strategies for cochlear implant patients; • Analyze recent research findings on the generation of tinnitus; • Practice new approaches to aural rehabilitation; • Solve challenges to participation and compliance in auditory rehabilitation. Accreditation University of California, San Francisco is a Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology and Hearing Aid Dispensers Board (SLPAHADB) approved provider for continuing professional development courses. This live activity meets the qualifications for 12 hours of continuing professional development credit for audiologists as required by SLPAHADB for hearing-aid related and non-hearing aid related. Provider #PDP313. This educational activity is approved for up to 1.2 CEUs and up to 1.2 Tier 1 CEUs from the American Academy of Audiology: Program number 13UCA-100. General Information Attendance / Sign-In Sheet / Certificates Please return your Attendance Verification Record (AVR) form by the end of the course along with your evaluation. Certificates will be mailed to you, at the address you registered with, in approximately 3-4 weeks post course. Each participant is required to sign-in and claim the number of credits in order to receive a certificate. The sign-in sheet will be located at the UCSF Registration Desk. Evaluation Your opinion is important to us. Please complete and return the course evaluation as it is important to future course planning. The evaluation is the colored sheet you received with your course syllabus. Please turn in the evaluation with your AVR form. Security We urge caution with regard to your personal belongings. Please do not leave any personal belongings unattended in the meeting room during lunch or breaks or overnight. Exhibits Industry exhibits will be available outside the ballroom on the Mezzanine level during breakfasts and breaks, and lunches. Course Reception: Friday, November 1 A course reception will be held directly after the lecture on Friday, November 1 from 5:30 pm -7:00 pm on the Mezzanine level. This is open to all attendees. Final Presentations PowerPoint presentations will be available on our website, www.cme.ucsf.edu, approximately 3 – 4 weeks post course. Only presentations that have been authorized for inclusion by the presenter will be included Federal and State Law Regarding Linguistic Access and Services for Limited English Proficient Persons I. Purpose. This document is intended to satisfy the requirements set forth in California Business and Professions code 2190.1. California law requires physicians to obtain training in cultural and linguistic competency as part of their continuing medical education programs. This document and the attachments are intended to provide physicians with an overview of federal and state laws regarding linguistic access and services for limited English proficient (“LEP”) persons. Other federal and state laws not reviewed below also may govern the manner in which physicians and healthcare providers render services for disabled, hearing impaired or other protected categories II. Federal Law – Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, Executive Order 13166, August 11, 2000, and Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) Regulations and LEP Guidance. The Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and HHS regulations require recipients of federal financial assistance (“Recipients”) to take reasonable steps to ensure that LEP persons have meaningful access to federally funded programs and services. Failure to provide LEP individuals with access to federally funded programs and services may constitute national origin discrimination, which may be remedied by federal agency enforcement action. Recipients may include physicians, hospitals, universities and academic medical centers who receive grants, training, equipment, surplus property and other assistance from the federal government. HHS recently issued revised guidance documents for Recipients to ensure that they understand their obligations to provide language assistance services to LEP persons. A copy of HHS’s summary document entitled “Guidance for Federal Financial Assistance Recipients Regarding Title VI and the Prohibition Against National Origin Discrimination Affecting Limited English Proficient Persons – Summary” is available at HHS’s website at: http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/lep/ . As noted above, Recipients generally must provide meaningful access to their programs and services for LEP persons. The rule, however, is a flexible one and HHS recognizes that “reasonable steps” may differ depending on the Recipient’s size and scope of services. HHS advised that Recipients, in designing an LEP program, should conduct an individualized assessment balancing four factors, including: (i) the number or proportion of LEP persons eligible to be served or likely to be encountered by the Recipient; (ii) the frequency with which LEP individuals come into contact with the Recipient’s program; (iii) the nature and importance of the program, activity or service provided by the Recipient to its beneficiaries; and (iv) the resources available to the Recipient and the costs of interpreting and translation services. Based on the Recipient’s analysis, the Recipient should then design an LEP plan based on five recommended steps,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Afternoon Sessions
    THURSDAY AFTERNOON, 6 JUNE 2013 513ABC, 1:00 P.M. TO 5:20 P.M. Session 4pAAa Architectural Acoustics: Room Acoustics Computer Simulation II Diemer de Vries, Cochair RWTH Aachen Univ., Inst. fuer Technische Akustik, Aachen D-52056, Germany Lauri Savioja, Cochair Dept. of Media Technol., Aalto Univ., P.O. Box 15500, Aalto FI-00076, Finland Invited Papers 1:00 4pAAa1. The differences and though the equivalence in the detection methods of particle, ray, and beam tracing. Uwe M. Ste- phenson (HafenCity Univ. Hamburg, Hebebrandstr. 1, Hamburg 22297, Germany, [email protected]) Within the numerical methods used in room acoustics, the geometrical and energetic methods of sound particle, ray and beam tracing are often confused. This rather tutorial paper does not treat the tracing algorithms but rather aims to explain the differences in the physi- cal models and the corresponding detection and evaluation methods. While ray tracing needs spherical detectors as receivers to count rays, the particle model is based on a weighting of the energies of the particles with their inner crossing distances to compute the local sound energy densities. For beam tracing, receiver points are sufficient. In its core, this paper shows the convergence of the evaluated intensities computed from immitted sound particle energies to those predicted by the well-known 1/R<+>2<+>-distance law for the free field—as applied with the mirror image source method and beam tracing as its efficient implementation. Finally, the geometrical methods are classified depending on their efficiency with higher orders of reflection and their extensibility by scattering and diffraction. 1:20 4pAAa2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Workplace Noise Exposure on Reaction Time Hollis T
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Dissertations The Graduate School Spring 2017 The effect of workplace noise exposure on reaction time Hollis T. Leidy James Madison University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/diss201019 Part of the Speech Pathology and Audiology Commons Recommended Citation Leidy, Hollis T., "The effect of workplace noise exposure on reaction time" (2017). Dissertations. 152. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/diss201019/152 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the The Graduate School at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Effect of Workplace Noise Exposure on Reaction Time Hollis Taylor Leidy A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Audiology Communication Sciences and Disorders May 2017 FACULTY COMMITTEE: Committee Chair: Ayasakanta Rout, Ph.D. Committee Members/ Readers: Brenda Ryals, Ph.D. Christopher Clinard, Ph.D. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor and mentor, Dr. Ayasakanta Rout, for his support and guidance throughout my dissertation project and through my graduate school experience. His friendship has taken me down the path to my dream job in a profession I will always love. I would also like to thank my committee members, Drs. Christopher Clinard and Brenda Ryals, for their support throughout this process and my entire graduate school career. I could not imagine a different graduate school experience; I will carry this experience with me for the rest of my life.
    [Show full text]
  • Sound Synthesis with Auditory Distortion Products.” in Amacher, M
    Gary S. Kendall,∗ Christopher Haworth,† Sound Synthesis with and Rodrigo F. Cadiz´ ∗∗ ∗Artillerigatan 40 Auditory Distortion 114 45 Stockholm, Sweden [email protected] Products †Faculty of Music Oxford University St. Aldate’s, Oxford, OX1 1 DB, United Kingdom [email protected] ∗∗Center for Research in Audio Technologies, Music Institute Pontificia Universidad Catolica´ de Chile Av. Jaime Guzman´ E. 3300 Providencia, Santiago, Chile 7511261 [email protected] Abstract: This article describes methods of sound synthesis based on auditory distortion products, often called combination tones. In 1856, Helmholtz was the first to identify sum and difference tones as products of auditory distortion. Today this phenomenon is well studied in the context of otoacoustic emissions, and the “distortion” is understood as a product of what is termed the cochlear amplifier. These tones have had a rich history in the music of improvisers and drone artists. Until now, the use of distortion tones in technological music has largely been rudimentary and dependent on very high amplitudes in order for the distortion products to be heard by audiences. Discussed here are synthesis methods to render these tones more easily audible and lend them the dynamic properties of traditional acoustic sound, thus making auditory distortion a practical domain for sound synthesis. An adaptation of single-sideband synthesis is particularly effective for capturing the dynamic properties of audio inputs in real time. Also presented is an analytic solution for matching up to four harmonics of a target spectrum. Most interestingly, the spatial imagery produced by these techniques is very distinctive, and over loudspeakers the normal assumptions of spatial hearing do not apply.
    [Show full text]
  • August 15 – 19, 2018
    IHCON 2018 International Hearing Aid Research Conference August 15 – 19, 2018 Granlibakken Conference Center Tahoe City, California IHCON 2018 2 August 15-19, 2018 IHCON 2018 Sponsors ● -- ● -- ● National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders The Hearing Industry Research Consortium Massachusetts Eye and Ear Eaton-Peabody Laboratories IHCON 2018 3 August 15-19, 2018 IHCON 2018 ● -- ● -- ● Technical Chair Birger Kollmeier Technical Co-Chairs Virginia Best ● Tom Francart Organizational Co-Chairs Sunil Puria ● Sigfrid Soli Steering Committee Sunil Puria, Organizational Co-Chair Sigfrid D. Soli, Organizational Co-Chair Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts Eye and Ear The University of British Columbia, Canada ● -- ● -- ● ● -- ● -- ● Birger Kollmeier, Technical Chair (2018) Virginia Best, Technical Co-Chair (2018) University of Oldenburg, Germany Boston University, USA ● -- ● -- ● ● -- ● -- ● Tom Francart, Technical Co-Chair (2018) Peggy Nelson, Technical Chair (2016) KU Leuven, Belgium University of Minnesota, USA ● -- ● -- ● ● -- ● -- ● Torsten Dau, Technical Co-Chair (2016) Kathryn Arehart, Technical Co-Chair (2014) Technical University of Denmark, Denmark University of Colorado, USA ● -- ● -- ● ● -- ● -- ● Susan Scollie, Technical Co-Chair (2014) Brian Moore, Technical Chair (2008) University of Western Ontario, Canada University of Cambridge, United Kingdom ● -- ● -- ● ● -- ● -- ● Judy Dubno, Technical Co-Chair (2008) Brent Edwards, Technical Co-Chair (2006) Medical University of South Carolina, USA National Acoustic
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Auditory Fatigue on Reaction Time in Normal Hearing Listeners Beth I
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Dissertations The Graduate School Spring 2015 The effect of auditory fatigue on reaction time in normal hearing listeners Beth I. Hulvey James Madison University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/diss201019 Part of the Speech Pathology and Audiology Commons Recommended Citation Hulvey, Beth I., "The effect of auditory fatigue on reaction time in normal hearing listeners" (2015). Dissertations. 26. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/diss201019/26 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the The Graduate School at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Effect of Auditory Fatigue on Reaction Time in Normal Hearing Listeners Beth I. Hulvey A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Audiology Communication Sciences and Disorders May 2015 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Ayasakanta Rout, for his constant collaboration and patience throughout data collection and the writing process. I would also like to acknowledge my committee members, Dr. Brenda Ryals and Dr. Christopher Clinard, for all their wisdom and input into this project. In addition, I would like to thank Nick Arra and Ali Bove for their help in recruiting subjects for this study. Without the help of the aforementioned individuals, this project would not have been possible. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments .............................................................................................................. ii Table of Contents ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation Into Improving Speech Intelligibility Using Binaural Signal Processing
    An investigation into improving speech intelligibility using binaural signal processing Gary Anthony Spittle PhD Electronics July 2009 1 Abstract This thesis sets out to improve the intelligibility of a target speech sound source when presented with simultaneous masking sounds. A summary of the human hearing system and methods for spatialising sounds is provided as background to the problem. A detailed review of relevant research in auditory masking, auditory continuity and speech intelligibility is discussed. Angular separation and sound object differentiation through amplitude modification are used to enhance a target speech sound. A novel method is developed for achieving this using only the binaural signals received at the ears of a listener. This new approach is termed an auditory lens. Psychoacoustic evaluation of the auditory lens processing has shown comparable intelligibility scores to direct spatialisation techniques which require prior knowledge of sound source spectral content and direction. The success of the auditory lens has led to a number of potential further research projects that will take the processing system closer to a real wearable product. 2 Table of contents Abstract ..................................................................................................................2 Table of contents ....................................................................................................3 List of Figures ........................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/0028356 A1 Ambrose Et Al
    US 20090028356A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/0028356 A1 Ambrose et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jan. 29, 2009 (54) DIAPHONIC ACOUSTIC TRANSDUCTION Publication Classification COUPLER AND EAR BUD (51) Int. Cl. (75) Inventors: Stephen D. Ambrose, Longmont, GIOK II/6 (2006.01) CO (US); Samuel P. Gido, Hadley, H04R L/10 (2006.01) MA (US); Jimmy W. Mays, Knoxville, TN (US); Roland (52) U.S. Cl. ........................................ 381/71.6; 381/380 Weidisch, Schonebeck (DE); Robert B. Schulein, Schaumburg, IL (US) (57) ABSTRACT Correspondence Address: The disclosed methods and devices incorporate a novel THE LAW OFFICE OF EDWARD LBSHOP expandable bubble portion which provides superior fidelity to 1240 S. OLD FORGE CT. a listener while minimizing listener fatigue. The expandable PALATINE, IL 60067 (US) bubble portion may be expanded through the transmission of low frequency audio signals or the pumping of a gas to the (73) Assignee: ASIUSTECHNOLOGIES, LLC, expandable bubble portion. In addition, embodiments of the Beaverton, OR (US) acoustic device may be adapted to consistently and comfort (21) Appl. No.: 12/178,236 ably fit to any ear, providing for a variable, impedance match ing acoustic Seal to both the tympanic membrane and the (22) Filed: Jul. 23, 2008 audio transducer, respectively, while isolating the Sound-vi bration chamber within the driven bubble. This reduces the Related U.S. Application Data effect of gross audio transducer vibration excursions on the (60) Provisional application No. 60/951,420, filed on Jul. tympanic membrane and transmits the audio content in a 23, 2007, provisional application No.
    [Show full text]
  • Minimal and Mild Hearing Loss in School-Aged Children
    THE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS OF A “TINY” HEARING LOSS Minimal and Mild Hearing Loss in School-Aged Children Maine Educational Center for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing © MECDHH 2017 THE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS OF A “TINY” HEARING LOSS Presenters: Katherine Duncan, AuD Donna Casavant, MED, CAS [email protected] [email protected] © MECDHH 2017 OBJECTIVES • Define a minimal hearing loss. • Identify potential causes of minimal hearing loss. • Describe some educational, communication, and social impacts of minimal hearing loss. © MECDHH 2017 WHAT’S IN A WORD? © MECDHH 2017 WHAT IS MINIMAL HEARING LOSS? © MECDHH 2017 UNDERSTANDING AN AUDIOGRAM Increasing Pitch Low High Increasing Loudness Soft Loud Right Ear Inaccessible Left Ear Accessible Speech Sounds © MECDHH 2017 MINIMAL = SLIGHT + MILD • 16 - 40 dB HL range • At least one ear © MECDHH 2017 SLIGHT HEARING LOSS • 16-25 dB HL range • At least one ear • Individual thresholds or pure tone averages © MECDHH 2017 MILD HEARING LOSS • 26 - 40 dB HL range • At least one ear • Individual thresholds or pure tone averages © MECDHH 2017 IDENTIFICATION • Universal Newborn Hearing Screening • School-based screenings • Audiological follow-up © MECDHH 2017 WHY ARE MINIMAL HEARING LEVELS MISSED IN UNIVERSAL NEWBORN SCREENING PROCESS? • Limitations of audiometric equipment • No screening / lost to follow up © MECDHH 2017 LATE IDENTIFICATION • Progressive © MECDHH 2017 LATE IDENTIFICATION • Late onset © MECDHH 2017 TYPES OF MINIMAL HEARING LOSS Conductive Sensorineural • Outer ear • Inner ear * Canal
    [Show full text]