Anesthetic Management of Humerus Fracture with Multiple Trauma And
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Managing a Rib Fracture: a Patient Guide
Managing a Rib Fracture A Patient Guide What is a rib fracture? How is a fractured rib diagnosed? A rib fracture is a break of any of the bones that form the Your doctor will ask questions about your injury and do a rib cage. There may be a single fracture of one or more ribs, physical exam. or a rib may be broken into several pieces. Rib fractures are The doctor may: usually quite painful as the ribs have to move to allow for normal breathing. • Push on your chest to find out where you are hurt. • Watch you breathe and listen to your lungs to make What is a flail chest? sure air is moving in and out normally. When three or more neighboring ribs are fractured in • Listen to your heart. two or more places, a “flail chest” results. This creates an • Check your head, neck, spine, and belly to make sure unstable section of chest wall that moves in the opposite there are no other injuries. direction to the rest of rib cage when you take a breath. • You may need to have an X-ray or other imaging test; For example, when you breathe in your rib cage rises out however, rib fractures do not always show up on X-rays. but the flail chest portion of the rib cage will actually fall in. So you may be treated as though you have a fractured This limits your ability to take effective deep breaths. rib even if an X-ray doesn’t show any broken bones. -
Evaluation and Management of the Polytraumatized Patient in Various Centers
World J. Surg. 7, 143-148, 1983 Wor Journal of Stirgery Evaluation and Management of the Polytraumatized Patient in Various Centers S. Olerud, M.D., and M. Allg6wer, M.D. The Akademiska Sjukhuset Uppsala, Sweden, and the Department of Surgery, Kantonsspital, Basel, Switzerland A questionnaire was sent to the following 6 trauma centers: Paris: Two or more peripheral, visceral, or com- University Hospital for Accident Surgery, Hannover, Fed- plex injuries with respiratory and circulatory fail- eral Republic of Germany (Prof. H. Tscherne); University ure. (This excludes patients who only have sus- of Munich, Department of Surgery, Klinikum Grossha- tained fractures.) dern, Munich, Federal Republic of Germany (Prof. G. Dallas: Multiply injured patient presenting le- Heberer); Akademiska Sjukhuset Uppsala, Sweden (Prof. sions to 2 cavities, associated with 2 or more long S. Olerud); University Hospital, Department of Surgery, bone failures; lesions to 1 cavity associated with 2 Basel, Switzerland (Prof. M. Allgiiwer); H6pital de la Piti~, or more long bone failures; or lesions to multiple Paris, France (Prof. R. Roy-Camille); and University of extremities (at minimum, 3 long bone failures). Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, U.S.A. (Prof. B. Claudi). Their answers have been summarized in a few short paragraphs where tabulation was not possible, Do You Grade Polytrauma, and If So, How? and then mainly in tabular form for convenient comparison among the various centers. There seems to be considerable international agreement on the main points of early aggres- Hannover: Yes, with our own grading system along sive cardiopulmonary management to prevent multiple with ISS and AIS. -
Delayed Traumatic Hemothorax in Older Adults
Open access Brief report Trauma Surg Acute Care Open: first published as 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000626 on 8 March 2021. Downloaded from Complication to consider: delayed traumatic hemothorax in older adults Jeff Choi ,1 Ananya Anand ,1 Katherine D Sborov,2 William Walton,3 Lawrence Chow,4 Oscar Guillamondegui,5 Bradley M Dennis,5 David Spain,1 Kristan Staudenmayer1 ► Additional material is ABSTRACT very small hemothoraces rarely require interven- published online only. To view, Background Emerging evidence suggests older adults tion whereas larger hemothoraces often undergo please visit the journal online immediate drainage. However, emerging evidence (http:// dx. doi. org/ 10. 1136/ may experience subtle hemothoraces that progress tsaco- 2020- 000626). over several days. Delayed progression and delayed suggests HTX in older adults with rib fractures may development of traumatic hemothorax (dHTX) have not experience subtle hemothoraces that progress in a 1Surgery, Stanford University, been well characterized. We hypothesized dHTX would delayed fashion over several days.1 2 If true, older Stanford, California, USA be infrequent but associated with factors that may aid adults may be at risk of developing empyema or 2Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, prediction. other complications without close monitoring. USA Methods We retrospectively reviewed adults aged ≥50 Delayed progression and delayed development of 3Radiology, Vanderbilt University years diagnosed with dHTX after rib fractures at two traumatic hemothorax (dHTX) have not been well Medical Center, Nashville, level 1 trauma centers (March 2018 to September 2019). characterized in literature. The ageing US popula- Tennessee, USA tion and increasing incidence of rib fractures among 4Radiology, Stanford University, dHTX was defined as HTX discovered ≥48 hours after Stanford, California, USA admission chest CT showed either no or ’minimal/trace’ older adults underscore a pressing need for better 5Department of Surgery, HTX. -
Rib Fracture Management Guideline
Rib Fracture Management Guideline The main goals of treatment for patients with multiple rib fractures, with or without flail segments, are pain control, support of respiratory function, and chest wall stabilization. ICU admission for two or more of the following: Age >65 years History of COPD and/or heart failure, home oxygen use, current smoker, or other significant pulmonary condition 4 or more rib fractures Flail segment (at least 3 consecutive ribs with 2 fractures) IS volumes <50% of predicted volume (see chart) Inadequate pain control Pain Management: Non-ICU patients should receive a multimodal regimen with PRN opioids (also see pain management algorithm for verbal patients) ICU patients should receive a PCA (morphine preferred) in addition to multimodal regimen Multimodal Pain Regimen (include all as appropriate): o Acetaminophen 1000mg PO/IV q8h (po preferred) o Ketoralac 15-30mg IV q6h x 5 days or ibuprofen 600mg po q6 hours PRN (avoid if bleeding or renal dysfunction) o Methocarbamol 500-1000mg PO/IV q8h (po preferred; avoid IV if renal dysfunction) PCA guidelines o PCA should NOT have a continuous rate or be administered with any other opioids o Recommended dose for morphine: 1 mg q6 minutes, max dose 10 mg/hour o Recommended for hydromorphone: 0.1 mg q15 minutes, max dose 0.4 mg/hr o Transition to an oral regimen as soon as possible . Determine the amount of opioid given over the previous 24 hours by PCA . If ≥ 40 mg morphine equivalents, start long-acting oxycodone (can’t be given through a feeding tube) BID with a 50% taper. -
Rib Cartilage Injuries
PHYSIO4ALL revitalise – bounce – be healthy Rib Cartilage Injuries Structure of the ribcage The ribcage supports the upper body, protects internal organs including the heart and lungs, and assists with breathing. It consists of 24 curved ribs arranged in 12 pairs. Each pair is attached to a vertebra in the spine. At the front of the body, the first seven pairs of ribs are attached directly to the sternum (breastbone) by cartilage known as costal cartilage. These ribs are often called ‘true ribs’. The next three pairs aren’t connected to the sternum. Instead, costal cartilage attaches these ‘false ribs’ to the last pair of true ribs. The remaining two pairs aren’t attached at the front of the body at all and are known as ‘floating ribs’. The ribcage is supported by ligaments and muscles, including the muscles between the ribs (intercostal muscles). These muscles allow the ribcage to expand when you breathe in, and drop when you breathe out. Rib injuries include bruises, torn cartilage and bone fractures. Shop No. P16, NorthPoint, 100 Miller St. North Sydney. NSW – 2060 T – (02) 99222212 F – (02) 99225577 W: www.physio4all.com.au E: [email protected] ABN: 77 548 297 578 PHYSIO4ALL revitalise – bounce – be healthy Symptoms of rib cartilage injury Symptoms of rib injuries depend on the type and severity of the injury, but can include: • Pain at the injury site • Pain when the ribcage flexes – for example when you breathe, cough, sneeze or laugh • Pain when rotating or side flexing your spine • Crunching or grinding sounds (crepitus) when the injury site is touched or moved • Muscle spasms of the ribcage • Deformed appearance of the ribcage • Breathing difficulties. -
Rib Fracture Management in the Older Adult; an Opportunity for Multidisciplinary Working
Subspecialty Section Rib fracture management in the older adult; an opportunity for multidisciplinary working Lauren Richardson and Shvaita Ralhan The elderly will soon make up the largest number of patients sustaining major trauma; a fall from standing height is their most common mechanism of injury1. Rib fractures are a common consequence of blunt chest trauma and are important to recognise and diagnose as complications can be fatal. They can be considered a surrogate for major trauma as up to 90% of patients will Lauren Richardson is an ST7 Registrar go on to have additional injuries identified2. The older in Geriatric and General Medicine working in the Thames Valley. Whilst adult presents a unique challenge. Their injuries are often undertaking a fellowship in Perioperative under-estimated and therefore under-triaged. Delays to Medicine she helped to develop the diagnosis are not uncommon3. Major Trauma Geriatric service at the John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford. he mortality and thoracic deal with. Decisions regarding which team morbidity in the elderly as these patients should be admitted under can a result of rib fractures is therefore be contentious. Nationally, there is double that of their younger significant variation, and even in institutions counterparts. In elderly patients, such as ours where pathways do exist, Tfor each additional rib fracture, mortality conflicts often arise as to where the patient increases by 19% and the risk of pneumonia should be managed and by whom. increases by 27%4. It is therefore not surprising that older adults who sustain rib This article aims to address the key issues fractures have increased lengths of stay and that arise when managing older adults with more prolonged intensive care admissions5–7. -
Development of a Large Animal Model of Lethal Polytrauma and Intra
Open access Original research Trauma Surg Acute Care Open: first published as 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000636 on 1 February 2021. Downloaded from Development of a large animal model of lethal polytrauma and intra- abdominal sepsis with bacteremia Rachel L O’Connell, Glenn K Wakam , Ali Siddiqui, Aaron M Williams, Nathan Graham, Michael T Kemp, Kiril Chtraklin, Umar F Bhatti, Alizeh Shamshad, Yongqing Li, Hasan B Alam, Ben E Biesterveld ► Additional material is ABSTRACT abdomen and pelvic contents. The same review published online only. To view, Background Trauma and sepsis are individually two of showed that of patients with whole body injuries, please visit the journal online 1 (http:// dx. doi. org/ 10. 1136/ the leading causes of death worldwide. When combined, 37.9% had penetrating injuries. The abdomen is tsaco- 2020- 000636). the mortality is greater than 50%. Thus, it is imperative one area of the body which is particularly suscep- to have a reproducible and reliable animal model to tible to penetrating injuries.2 In a review of patients Surgery, Michigan Medicine, study the effects of polytrauma and sepsis and test novel in Afghanistan with penetrating abdominal wounds, University of Michigan, Ann treatment options. Porcine models are more translatable the majority of injuries were to the gastrointes- Arbor, Michigan, USA to humans than rodent models due to the similarities tinal tract with the most common injury being to 3 Correspondence to in anatomy and physiological response. We embarked the small bowel. While this severe constellation Dr Glenn K Wakam; gw akam@ on a study to develop a reproducible model of lethal of injuries is uncommon in the civilian setting, med. -
Renal Endocrine Manifestations During Polytrauma: a Cause of Concern for the Anesthesiologist
Review Article Renal endocrine manifestations during polytrauma: A cause of concern for the anesthesiologist Sukhminder Jit Singh Bajwa, Ashish Kulshrestha Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Gian Sagar Medical College and Hospital, Ram Nagar, Banur, Punjab, India ABSTRACT Nowadays, an increasing number of patients get admitted with polytrauma, mainly due to road traffic accidents. These polytrauma victims may exhibit associated renal injuries, in addition to bone injuries and injuries to other visceral organs. Nevertheless, even in cases of polytrauma, renal tissue is hyperfunctional as part of the normal protective responses of the body to external insults. Both polytrauma and renal injuries exhibit widespread renal, endocrine, and metabolic responses. The situation is very challenging for the attending anesthesiologist, as he is expected to contribute immensely, not only in the resuscitation of such patients, but if required, to allow the operative procedures in case of life-threatening injuries. During administration of anesthesia, care has to be taken, not only to maintain hemodynamic stability, but equal attention has to be paid to various renal protection strategies. At the same time, various renoendocrine manifestations have to be taken into account, so that a judicious use of anesthesia drugs can be made, to minimize the renal insults. Key words: Anesthesia, polytrauma, renal injuries, renal protection, renoendocrine manifestations INTRODUCTION trauma are also one of the major protective responses exerted by the body to maintain a normal metabolic and Major trauma is a pathophysiological state that threatens endocrine milieu. The caloric substitutes are mobilized so [2] the integrity of the internal environment, causing alteration that supply of glucose to the vital organs is maintained. -
Prehospital Determination of Tracheal Tube Placement in Severe Head Injury
518 PREHOSPITAL CARE Prehospital determination of tracheal tube placement in severe head injury Emerg Med J: first published as on 18 June 2004. Downloaded from Sˇ Grmec, Sˇ Mally ............................................................................................................................... Emerg Med J 2004;21:518–520. doi: 10.1136/emj.2002.001974 Objectives: The aim of this prospective study in the prehospital setting was to compare three different methods for immediate confirmation of tube placement into the trachea in patients with severe head injury: auscultation, capnometry, and capnography. Methods: All adult patients (.18 years) with severe head injury, maxillofacial injury with need of protection of airway, or polytrauma were intubated by an emergency physician in the field. Tube position was initially evaluated by auscultation. Then, capnometry and capnography was performed (infrared method). Emergency physicians evaluated capnogram and partial pressure of end tidal carbon dioxide See end of article for (EtCO2) in millimetres of mercury. Determination of final tube placement was performed by a second direct authors’ affiliations ....................... visualisation with laryngoscope. Data are mean (SD) and percentages. Results: There were 81 patients enrolled in this study (58 with severe head injury, 6 with maxillofacial Correspondence to: trauma, and 17 politraumatised patients). At the first attempt eight patients were intubated into the ˇ Dr S Mally, Zdravstveni oesophagus. Afterwards endotracheal intubation was undertaken in all without complications. The initial Dom, dr Adolfa Droica, Ulica talcev 9, Maribor, capnometry (sensitivity 100%, specificity 100%), capnometry after sixth breath (sensitivity 100%, specificity Slovenia; stefan.mally@ 100%), and capnography after sixth breath (sensitivity 100%, specificity 100%) were significantly better guest.arnes.si indicators for tracheal tube placement than auscultation (sensitivity 94%, specificity 66%, p,0.01). -
Theappearanceof Bonescansfollowingfractures,Inciudingimmediateand Long@-Termstudies
CLINICAL SCIENCES DIAGNOS11C NUCLEAR MEDICINE TheAppearanceof BoneScansFollowingFractures,InciudingImmediateand Long@-TermStudies Philip Matin RosevilleCommunityHospital,Roseville,andUniversityof California,Davis,California Bone scans were performed on 204 patients at Intervals ranging from 6 hr to several years after traumatic fractures. The minimum time for a bone scan to be come abnormal following fracture was age-dependent; however, 80% of all frac tures were abnormal by 24 hr, and 95 % by 72 1w,after Injury. Three distinct tempo rally related phases were noted on bone scans as sequential studies showed a gradual return to normal. The minimum tIme for a fracture to return to normal on a bone scan was 5 mo. Approximately 90% of the fractures returned to normal by 2 yr after injury. J NuciMed 20:1227—1231,1979 Bone scans performed with technetium-99m phos were performed within 2 wk after fracture, including 60 phate compounds have proven to be among the most patients who had bone scans within the first week of in useful nuclear medicine procedures. The bone scan jury. The studies on these patients were performed until provides a sensitive method of detecting primary and their fractures became abnormal or until 7 days after metastatic skeletal neoplasms, and it has been useful in injury. In this group, nine patients were studied within evaluating metabolic bone disease and various joint 6 hr of their injury, and 20 within 24 hr. abnormalities (1—8).Although the procedure is helpful The subacute studies were performed during the in in evaluating skeletal trauma (9—12,14)little informa terval from 4 wk to 4 mo after injury; and the long-term tion is available about how bone scans change in ap or healing-stage studies were performed at periods pearance following fracture, and there have been es varying from 6 to 36 mo after fracture. -
Predictive Value of Scoring System in Severe Pediatric Head Injury
Medicina (Kaunas) 2007; 43(11) 861 Predictive value of scoring system in severe pediatric head injury Dovilė Evalda Grinkevičiūtė, Rimantas Kėvalas, Viktoras Šaferis1, Algimantas Matukevičius1, Vytautas Ragaišis2, Arimantas Tamašauskas1 Department of Children’s Diseases, 1Institute for Biomedical Research, 2Department of Neurosurgery, Kaunas University of Medicine, Lithuania Key words: pediatric head trauma; Glasgow Coma Scale, Pediatric Trauma Score; Glasgow Outcome Scale, Pediatric Index of Mortality 2. Summary. Objectives. To determine the threshold values of Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 (PIM 2) score, Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS), and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score for mortality in children after severe head injury and to evaluate changes in outcomes of children after severe head injury on discharge and after 6 months. Material and methods. All children with severe head injury admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit of Kaunas University of Medicine Hospital, Lithuania, from January 2004 to June 2006 were prospectively included in the study. The severity of head injury was categorized according to the GCS score ≤8. As initial assessment tools, the PTS, postresuscitation GCS, and PIM 2 scores were calculated for each patient. Outcome was assessed according to Glasgow Outcome Scale on discharge and after 6 months. Results. The study population consisted of 59 children with severe head injury. The group consisted of 37 (62.7%) boys and 22(37.3%) girls; the mean age was 10.6±6.02. The mean GCS, PTS, and PIM 2 scores were 5.9±1.8, 4.8±2.7, and 14.0±19.5, respectively. In terms of overall outcome, 46 (78.0%) patients survived and 13 (22.0%) died. -
Vertebroplasty
Association for Radiologic & Imaging Nursing Clinical Practice Guideline Vertebroplasty Overview Vertebroplasty is a percutaneous procedure performed to treat painful vertebral compression fractures. The procedure uses Polymethlymethacrylate (PMMA) through a needle percutaneously inserted into the body of the vertebrae to stabilize the compression fracture. This procedure is commonly performed as an outpatient procedure for treatment of osteoporotic, metastatic, and benign lytic lesions such as hemangiomas of the spine. It is not typically used to treat the non- osteoporotic acute traumatic compression fracture. Target Audience RNs working in the Interventional Radiology Division Content/Strategies Osteoporosis is present in one out of every four women and one out of every eight men, over the age of 50. Along with the aging baby boomer generation, it is being identified by the public in greater numbers as a health risk. Neoplastic disease can metastasize to the vertebrae causing compression fractures. Treating these painful lesions in a palliative manner can improve end-of-life quality. Hemangiomas destabilize the body of the vertebrae leading to compression fracture. Eighty to 90 percent of patients obtain significant pain relief. Nursing Considerations: Pre procedure- Adequate intravenous access Proper positioning—often these patients are frail elders who must be positioned prone for the procedure. Bony prominences must be protected. Care must be taken when moving these patients to prevent causing fragility fractures to legs and ribs. Adequate airway maintenance in the prone position must be assured. Most procedures can be done under conscious sedation with some local anesthetic, although some might require general anesthesia depending on their acuity level. Intra procedure- Absolute sterility of this procedure is imperative—full surgical scrub of site, cap/mask for all in room.