Geochemical Modeling of Solubility and Speciation of Uranium, Neptunium, and Plutonium

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geochemical Modeling of Solubility and Speciation of Uranium, Neptunium, and Plutonium Publications (YM) Yucca Mountain 5-2007 Geochemical modeling of solubility and speciation of uranium, neptunium, and plutonium Zhongbo Yu Yuyu Lin Karen Johannesson Amy J. Smiecinski University of Nevada, Las Vegas, [email protected] Klaus J. Stetzenbach University of Nevada, Las Vegas, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/yucca_mtn_pubs Part of the Geochemistry Commons Repository Citation Yu, Z., Lin, Y., Johannesson, K., Smiecinski, A. J., Stetzenbach, K. J. (2007). Geochemical modeling of solubility and speciation of uranium, neptunium, and plutonium. Available at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/yucca_mtn_pubs/66 This Technical Report is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Technical Report in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Technical Report has been accepted for inclusion in Publications (YM) by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Conceptual Model Mathenutical Model Process Model C] Ahslrdon Modd Systeun Model Intended use of Model lnput to Calculation ' lnput to another Model 0 lnput to Technical Documont lnput to other Technclol Product. Descritm use: This model is used to evaluate the sensitivity of the current models to solubility data and to predict the impad of actinide speciation data on the behavior and mobility of actinide species. 7 (0)Principal Investigator Klaus J. Stebenbach k/~dddr~~~~ (10) Remarks: // MODEL REVISION HISTORY Complete only applicable items (1) Page 1 of 1 (2) Model Title: Geochemical Modeling of Solubility and Speciation of Uranium, Neptunium, and Plutonium (3) Document Identifier (including Revision No.): MOD-06-001 REV 00 (4) (5) Description of Revision 0 Initial Issue ACRONYMS ACC Yucca Mountain Project Records Accession Number AMR Analysis Model Report DIRS Document Input Reference System DOE U.S. Department of Energy DTN Data Tracking Number ESF Exploratory Studies Facility NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NCEWDP Nye County Early Warning Drilling Program NTS Nevada Test Site OCRWM Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Q Qualified QA Quality Assurance QAP Quality Assurance Procedure RW Radionuclide Wastes RWP Radionuclide Wastes Package SZ Saturated Zone UQ Unqualified USGS U.S. Geological Survey UZ Unsaturated Zone YM Yucca Mountain TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................. iv LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................ v 1. PURPOSE.................................................................................................................... 1 2. QUALITY ASSURANCE........................................................................................... 2 3. COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND MODEL USAGE.................................................. 2 4. INPUTS........................................................................................................................ 3 4.1 DATA AND PARAMETERS .................................................................................. 3 4.1.1 Direct Inputs....................................................................................................... 3 4.1.2 Indirect Inputs .................................................................................................... 4 4.2 CRITERIA ................................................................................................................ 5 4.3 CODES AND STANDARDS................................................................................... 5 5. ASSUMPTIONS.......................................................................................................... 6 6. MODEL ....................................................................................................................... 7 6.1 MODEL OBJECTIVES............................................................................................ 7 6.2 OVERVIEW OF THE MODEL ............................................................................... 7 6.3 TECHNICAL ISSUES IN SOLUBILITY EVALUATION..................................... 7 6.3.1 The Definition of Solid Solubility ..................................................................... 8 6.3.2 Uranium Solubility............................................................................................. 8 6.3.3 Neptunium Solubility....................................................................................... 10 6.3.4 Plutonium Solubility ........................................................................................ 10 6.4 TECHNICAL ISSUES IN SPECIATION EVALUATION................................... 11 6.4.1 The Definition of Aqueous Speciation ............................................................ 11 6.4.2 Uranium Aqueous Speciation .......................................................................... 11 6.4.3 Neptunium Aqueous Speciation ...................................................................... 11 6.4.4 Plutonium Aqueous Speciation........................................................................ 12 6.5 TREATMENT OF VARIATION AND UNCERTAINTY.................................... 13 6.6 MODEL CONFIGURATION ................................................................................ 13 6.6.1 Temperature ..................................................................................................... 13 6.6.2 pH..................................................................................................................... 14 6.6.3 CO2 Fugacity................................................................................................... 14 6.6.4 Oxidation Potential .......................................................................................... 14 6.7 URANIUM SOLUBILITY AND SPECIATION RESULTS................................. 14 6.7.1 Solubility Results............................................................................................. 14 6.7.2 Speciation Results............................................................................................ 18 6.8 NEPTUNIUM SOLUBILITY AND SPECIATION RESULTS ............................ 20 6.8.1 Solubility Results............................................................................................. 20 6.8.2 Speciation Results............................................................................................ 23 6.9 PLUTONIUM SOLUBILITY AND SPECIATION .............................................. 23 6.9.1 Solubility Results............................................................................................. 23 6.9.2 Speciation Results............................................................................................ 26 6.10 MODEL VALIDATION .......................................................................................... 26 6.10.1 Validation Criteria ............................................................................................. 26 6.10.2 Testing and Comparison .................................................................................... 28 7. CONCLUSIONS........................................................................................................ 31 ii 7.1 MODEL OUTPUT.................................................................................................. 31 7.2 OUTPUT UNCERTAINTY ................................................................................... 31 7.3 RESTRICTIONS .................................................................................................... 31 8. INPUTS AND REFERENCES................................................................................ 33 9. ATTACHMENTS.................................................................................................... 37 APPENDIX A TRANSPORT MODEL DISCUSSION................................................... 37 A.1 OVERVIEW OF THE TRANSPORT MODEL.................................................... 37 A.2 URANIUM TRANSPORT MODEL..................................................................... 39 A.3 NEPTUNIUM AND PLUTONIUM TRANSPORT MODEL .............................. 42 iii LIST OF TABLES Table 4-1 Input Data Source and Data Tracking Number for Solubility and Speciation Model. ............................................................................................................... 4 Table 4-2 Chemical Compositions of Solution Used in Solubility and Speciation Models............................................................................................................... 4 Table 4-3 Summary of Indirect Inputs .............................................................................. 5 Table 6-1 Dissolution Equations of Principal Alteration Phases of Uranium, Neptunium, and Plutonium at 25ºC. ................................................. 9 Table 6-2 Calculated Uranium Solubility Controlled by Secondary Minerals (mol/L).. 16 Table 6-3 Calculated Neptunium Solubility Controlled by Np2O5 (mol/L)...................
Recommended publications
  • A Protein Engineered to Bind Uranyl Selectively and with Femtomolar Affinity
    ARTICLES PUBLISHED ONLINE: 26 JANUARY 2014 | DOI: 10.1038/NCHEM.1856 A protein engineered to bind uranyl selectively and with femtomolar affinity Lu Zhou1†, Mike Bosscher1†, Changsheng Zhang2,3†,SalihO¨ zc¸ubukc¸u1, Liang Zhang1, Wen Zhang1, Charles J. Li1, Jianzhao Liu1, Mark P. Jensen4, Luhua Lai2,3* and Chuan He1* 21 ∼ Uranyl (UO2 ), the predominant aerobic form of uranium, is present in the ocean at a concentration of 3.2 parts per 109 (13.7 nM); however, the successful enrichment of uranyl from this vast resource has been limited by the high concentrations of metal ions of similar size and charge, which makes it difficult to design a binding motif that is selective for uranyl. Here we report the design and rational development of a uranyl-binding protein using a computational screening process in the initial search for potential uranyl-binding sites. The engineered protein is thermally stable and offers very high affinity and selectivity for uranyl with a Kd of 7.4 femtomolar (fM) and >10,000-fold selectivity over other metal ions. We also demonstrated that the uranyl-binding protein can repeatedly sequester 30–60% of the uranyl in synthetic sea water. The chemical strategy employed here may be applied to engineer other selective metal-binding proteins for biotechnology and remediation applications. ranium is the key element for nuclear-energy production and Through billions of years of evolution nature has produced is important in many other applications. The most stable and strategies to recognize beneficial or toxic metal ions with high Urelevant uranium ion in aerobic environments is the uranyl sensitivity and selectivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Hierarchically-Structured Metalloprotein Composite
    ARTICLE There are amendments to this paper https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14709-y OPEN Hierarchically-structured metalloprotein composite coatings biofabricated from co-existing condensed liquid phases ✉ Franziska Jehle 1, Elena Macías-Sánchez1, Sanja Sviben1, Peter Fratzl1, Luca Bertinetti 1 & ✉ Matthew J. Harrington 1,2 1234567890():,; Complex hierarchical structure governs emergent properties in biopolymeric materials; yet, the material processing involved remains poorly understood. Here, we investigated the multi- scale structure and composition of the mussel byssus cuticle before, during and after for- mation to gain insight into the processing of this hard, yet extensible metal cross-linked protein composite. Our findings reveal that the granular substructure crucial to the cuticle’s function as a wear-resistant coating of an extensible polymer fiber is pre-organized in con- densed liquid phase secretory vesicles. These are phase-separated into DOPA-rich proto- granules enveloped in a sulfur-rich proto-matrix which fuses during secretion, forming the sub-structure of the cuticle. Metal ions are added subsequently in a site-specific way, with iron contained in the sulfur-rich matrix and vanadium coordinated by DOPA-catechol in the granule. We posit that this hierarchical structure self-organizes via phase separation of specific amphiphilic proteins within secretory vesicles, resulting in a meso-scale structuring that governs cuticle function. 1 Department of Biomaterials, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, 14424 Potsdam,
    [Show full text]
  • Depleted Uranium Technical Brief
    Disclaimer - For assistance accessing this document or additional information,please contact [email protected]. Depleted Uranium Technical Brief United States Office of Air and Radiation EPA-402-R-06-011 Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 December 2006 Depleted Uranium Technical Brief EPA 402-R-06-011 December 2006 Project Officer Brian Littleton U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Radiation and Indoor Air Radiation Protection Division ii iii FOREWARD The Depleted Uranium Technical Brief is designed to convey available information and knowledge about depleted uranium to EPA Remedial Project Managers, On-Scene Coordinators, contractors, and other Agency managers involved with the remediation of sites contaminated with this material. It addresses relative questions regarding the chemical and radiological health concerns involved with depleted uranium in the environment. This technical brief was developed to address the common misconception that depleted uranium represents only a radiological health hazard. It provides accepted data and references to additional sources for both the radiological and chemical characteristics, health risk as well as references for both the monitoring and measurement and applicable treatment techniques for depleted uranium. Please Note: This document has been changed from the original publication dated December 2006. This version corrects references in Appendix 1 that improperly identified the content of Appendix 3 and Appendix 4. The document also clarifies the content of Appendix 4. iv Acknowledgments This technical bulletin is based, in part, on an engineering bulletin that was prepared by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air (ORIA), with the assistance of Trinity Engineering Associates, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • A Structural and Spectroscopic Study of the First Uranyl Selenocyanate, [Et4n]3[UO2(Ncse)5]
    inorganics Article A Structural and Spectroscopic Study of the First Uranyl Selenocyanate, [Et4N]3[UO2(NCSe)5] Stefano Nuzzo, Michelle P. Browne, Brendan Twamley, Michael E. G. Lyons and Robert J. Baker * School of Chemistry, Trinity College, University of Dublin, 2 Dublin, Ireland; [email protected] (S.N.); [email protected] (M.P.B.); [email protected] (B.T.); [email protected] (M.E.G.L.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +353-1-896-3501; Fax: +353-1-671-2826 Academic Editors: Stephen Mansell and Steve Liddle Received: 30 October 2015; Accepted: 4 February 2016; Published: 16 February 2016 Abstract: The first example of a uranyl selenocyanate compound is reported. The compound [Et4N]3[UO2(NCSe)5] has been synthesized and fully characterized by vibrational and multinuclear (1H, 13C{1H} and 77Se{1H}) NMR spectroscopy. The photophysical properties have also been recorded and trends in a series of uranyl pseudohalides discussed. Spectroscopic evidence shows that the U–NCSe bonding is principally ionic. An electrochemical study revealed that the reduced uranyl(V) species is unstable to disproportionation and a ligand based oxidation is also observed. The structure of [Et4N]4[UO2(NCSe)5][NCSe] is also presented and Se¨ ¨ ¨ H–C hydrogen bonding and Se¨ ¨ ¨ Se chalcogen–chalcogen interactions are seen. Keywords: uranyl; structural determination; photophysics 1. Introduction The chemistry of uranium in its highest oxidation state has held scientists fascination for a long 2+ period of time. The uranyl moiety, [UO2] , is well studied in aqueous phases due, in part, to relevance in the nuclear waste treatment. Moreover, the photophysical properties of uranyl were first used in ancient roman times in colored glass [1], whilst comprehensive understanding of the bonding, and therefore photophysical properties, has come from both experiment and theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Procedure for Determining Uranium, Plutonium and Americium by Extraction-Chromatographic Procedures
    Procedure for determining uranium, plutonium and americium by extraction-chromatographic procedures H-U/Pu/Am-AWASS-01 Authors: M. Beyermann D. Obrikat Federal coordinating office for drinking water, groundwater, wastewater, sludge, waste and wastewater of nuclear power plants (Leitstelle für die Überwachung der Radioaktivität in Trinkwasser, Grundwasser, Abwasser, Klärschlamm, Reststoffen und Abfällen) ISSN 1865-8725 Version October 2000 Procedures manual for monitoring of radioactive substances in the environment and of external radiation (Messanleitungen für die „Überwachung radioaktiver Stoffe in der Umwelt und externer Strahlung“) H-U/Pu/Am-AWASS-01-01 Procedure for determining uranium, plutonium and americium by means of extraction- chromatographic procedures 1 Scope This procedure serves to simultaneously determine the uranium isotopes U-234, U-235 and U-238, the plutonium isotopes Pu-238, Pu-239 and Pu-240, as well as the americium isotope Am-241 in samples of wastewater from nuclear facilities. It furthermore offers an option of determining the curium isotopes Cm-242 and Cm-244 without further effort. For determining Pu-241, reference is made to pro- cedure H-Pu-241-AWASS-01 of these measuring instructions. 2 Sampling As far as sampling is concerned, reference is made to procedure H-SPEKT- AWASS-01 of these measuring instructions. The sample of the wastewater to be analysed is acidified with ca. 10 ml of concentrated nitric acid (14 mol·l-1) per litre to a pH of about 1. The stability of the acidic reaction needs to be monitored, in particular if the sample is stored for an extended period of time. This procedure ensures that a detection limit of 0,05 Bq·l-1 for alpha-emitters is reached in a sample volume of 0,1 litres to 0,25 litres and thus complies with the nuclear safety standard 1504 of the Nuclear Safety Standards Commission (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Anion Photoelectron Spectroscopic and Relativistic Coupled-Cluster Studies of − Uranyl Dichloride Anion, Uo2cl2 Mary Marshall, Zhaoguo Zhu, Junzi Liu, Kit H
    Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 379 (2021) 111496 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/yjmsp Article Anion photoelectron spectroscopic and relativistic coupled-cluster studies of * uranyl dichloride anion, UO2Cl2 Mary Marshall, Zhaoguo Zhu, Junzi Liu, Kit H. Bowen, Lan Cheng < Department of Chemistry, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA ARTICLEINFO ABSTRACT Keywords: A joint relativistic coupled-cluster and experimental photoelectron (PE) spectroscopic study of the uranyl Coupled-cluster * dichloride anion, UO2Cl2 , is reported. Sophisticated electronic-structure calculations predict the photodetach- Anion photoelectron * ment of UO2Cl to involve a U 5f electron and to be followed by significant geometry relaxation. Therefore, the Uranyl 2 adiabatic electron affinity (EAa) of the uranyl dichloride neutral molecule, UO2Cl2, and the vertical detachment * energy (VDE) of its anion, UO2Cl2 , provide valuable information about its uranium 5f orbital energies. The EAa value was computed to be 3.15 eV. The VDE value was calculated to be 3.55 eV by augmenting the computed EAa with a shift derived from a Franck–Condon simulation using coupled-cluster potential energy surfaces. The VDE, which corresponds to the highest intensity peak in the PE spectrum, was measured to be 3.69 , 0.20 eV, in good agreement with the computed value. The origin transition in the PE spectrum, whose electron binding energy corresponds to the EAa, was assigned to the feature at 3.2 , 0.20 eV, consistent with the computed EAa. 1. Introduction at 20323 cm*1 with nearly harmonic vibrational progressions at a frequency of 840 cm*1 [15].
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Heterometallic Uranyl-Transition Metal Materials: Structure, Topology, and Solid State Photoluminescence Properties † ‡ ‡ § Germań E
    Article Cite This: Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 7243−7254 pubs.acs.org/IC Novel Heterometallic Uranyl-Transition Metal Materials: Structure, Topology, and Solid State Photoluminescence Properties † ‡ ‡ § Germań E. Gomez, J. August Ridenour, Nicole M. Byrne, Alexander P. Shevchenko, ‡ and Christopher L. Cahill*, † Instituto de Investigaciones en Tecnología Química (INTEQUI), Area de Química General e Inorganicá “Dr. G. F. Puelles,” Facultad de Química, Bioquímica y Farmacia, Chacabuco y Pedernera, Universidad Nacional de San Luis, Almirante Brown, 1455, 5700 San Luis, Argentina ‡ Department of Chemistry, The George Washington University, Science and Engineering Hall, 800 22nd Street, NW, Washington, DC 20052, United States § Samara Center for Theoretical Materials Science, Samara University, 34, Moskovskoye shosse, Samara, 443086, Russia *S Supporting Information ABSTRACT: Six new uranyl hybrid materials have been synthesized solvothermally ′ ′ ′ ′ ′′ utilizing the ligands 2,2 -bipyridine-3,3 -dicarboxylic acid (H2L) and 2,2 :6 ,2 -terpyridine (TPY). The six compounds are classified as either molecular complexes (I0O0 connectivity), · · [(UO2)(L)(TPY)] H2O(1), [Ni(TPY)2][(UO2)(L)2] 3H2O(2), and [Cu(TPY)2]- · − 0 3 [(UO2)(L)2] 3H2O(3), or 3D metal organic frameworks (MOFs, I O connectivity), · [Cu2(UO2)2(OH)(C2H3O2)(L)3(TPY)2] 6H2O(4), [Zn2(UO2)2(OH)(NO3)(C2H3O2)- · · (L)3(TPY)2] 4H2O(5), and Na[Ni(UO2)3(OH)(O)(L)3] 9H2O(6). A discussion of the influence of transition metal incorporation, chelating effects of the ligand, and synthesis conditions on the formation of uranyl materials is presented. The structure of compound 6 is of particular note due to large channel-like voids with a diameter of approximately 19.6 Å.
    [Show full text]
  • Actinide Separation Inspired by Self-Assembled Metal-Polyphenolic Nanocages
    Page 1 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Actinide separation inspired by self-assembled metal-polyphenolic 8 9 nanocages 10 †, §, †, ‡, § † # † † ⊥ 11 Lei Mei, * Peng Ren, Qun-yan Wu, Yu-bin Ke, Jun-shan Geng, Kang Liu, Xue-qing Xing, 12 Zhi-wei Huang, † Kong-qiu Hu, † Ya-lan Liu, † Li-yong Yuan, † Guang Mo, ⊥ Zhong-hua Wu, ⊥ John K 13 Gibson, & Zhi-fang Chai, †, ¶ Wei-qun Shi †, * 14 15 † Laboratory of Nuclear Energy Chemistry, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 16 ‡ State key Laboratory of Nuclear Resources and Environment, School of Chemistry, School of Nuclear Science and Engineering, 17 East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China. 18 ⊥Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 19 # Spallation Neutron Source Science Center, Dongguan 523803, China 20 ¶ Engineering Laboratory of Advanced Energy Materials, Ningbo Institute of Industrial Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 21 Ningbo 315201, China 22 & Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, California 94720, USA 23 KEYWORDS: actinides; nano-extraction; uranyl-organic nanocage; self-assembly; pyrogallol[4]arene 24 25 26 ABSTRACT: The separation of actinides has a vital place in nuclear fuel reprocessing, recovery of radionuclides and 27 remediation of environmental contamination. Here we propose a new paradigm of nanocluster-based actinide separation, 28 namely nano-extraction, that can achieve efficient sequestration of uranium in an unprecedented form of giant coordination 29 nanocages using a cone-shaped macrocyclic pyrogallol[4]arene as the extractant. The U24-based hexameric 30 pyrogallol[4]arene nanocages with distinctive [U2PG2] binuclear units (PG = pyrogallol), that rapidly assembled in situ in 31 monophasic solvent, were identified by single-crystal XRD, MALDI-TOF-MS, NMR, and SAXS/SANS.
    [Show full text]
  • Icp-Oes and Xas Investigation of the Phytoextraction of Lanthanides and Actinides from Aqueous Environmental Solutions 1J.G
    ICP-OES AND XAS INVESTIGATION OF THE PHYTOEXTRACTION OF LANTHANIDES AND ACTINIDES FROM AQUEOUS ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS 1J.G. Parsons, 2J.L. Gardea-Torresdey, 1K.J. Tiemann, 1J.R. Peratta-Videa, 1E. Gomez, and 1J.H. Gonzalez 1Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, 500 W. University Ave., University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso TX. 79968; Phone: (915)747-5359; Fax: (915)747- 5748. 2Department of Chemistry, 500 W. University Ave, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968; Phone: (915)747-5359; Fax: (915)747-5748. Abstract Use of nuclear power raises questions about nuclear waste, especially how it can be minimized and stored safely. One alternative is extraction and reprocessing of the uranium from the spent fuel. But the reprocessing of spent fuel is very expensive and requires use of ion exchange resins that cannot be reused. Some biomaterials have been studied for their ability to extract lanthanides and actinides, such as uranyl cation from solution. In this study, the extraction of uranyl nitrate, uranyl acetate, and europium nitrate from aqueous solution using an alfalfa biomaterial was investigated. Major factors affecting the sorption of cations from solution are pH, time, and interfering cations. Studies were performed to investigate each of the above parameters. In addition, capacity studies were performed for comparison purposes with common methods to extract these cations from solutions. To investigate the chemical environment where uranyl and europium cations were bound to the alfalfa biomass, X-ray absorption spectroscopy studies were performed. The X-Ray absorption near-edge structure showed that europium(III) and uranyl cations remained in the same oxidation state when bound to the biomass, with characteristic LIII-edge energies for uranyl and europium(III) of 17.172 keV and 6.981 keV, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Separation of Radioactive Elements from Rare Earth Element-Bearing Minerals
    metals Review Separation of Radioactive Elements from Rare Earth Element-Bearing Minerals Adrián Carrillo García 1, Mohammad Latifi 1,2, Ahmadreza Amini 1 and Jamal Chaouki 1,* 1 Process Development Advanced Research Lab (PEARL), Chemical Engineering Department, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, C.P. 6079, Succ. Centre-ville, Montreal, QC H3C 3A7, Canada; [email protected] (A.C.G.); mohammad.latifi@polymtl.ca (M.L.); [email protected] (A.A.) 2 NeoCtech Corp., Montreal, QC H3G 2N7, Canada * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 8 October 2020; Accepted: 13 November 2020; Published: 17 November 2020 Abstract: Rare earth elements (REE), originally found in various low-grade deposits in the form of different minerals, are associated with gangues that have similar physicochemical properties. However, the production of REE is attractive due to their numerous applications in advanced materials and new technologies. The presence of the radioactive elements, thorium and uranium, in the REE deposits, is a production challenge. Their separation is crucial to gaining a product with minimum radioactivity in the downstream processes, and to mitigate the environmental and safety issues. In the present study, different techniques for separation of the radioactive elements from REE are reviewed, including leaching, precipitation, solvent extraction, and ion chromatography. In addition, the waste management of the separated radioactive elements is discussed with a particular conclusion that such a waste stream can be
    [Show full text]
  • Oxidation State Analyses of Uranium with Emphasis on Chemical Speciation in Geological Media
    University of Helsinki View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Faculty of Science brought to you by CORE Department of Chemistry provided by Helsingin yliopiston digitaalinen arkisto Laboratory of Radiochemistry Finland OXIDATION STATE ANALYSES OF URANIUM WITH EMPHASIS ON CHEMICAL SPECIATION IN GEOLOGICAL MEDIA Heini Ervanne Academic Dissertation To be presented with the permission of the Faculty of Science of the University of Helsinki for public criticism in the Main lecture hall A110 of the Kumpula Chemistry Department on May 14th, 2004, at 12 o’clock noon. Helsinki 2004 ISSN 0358-7746 ISBN 952-10-1825-9 (nid.) ISBN 952-10-1826-7 (PDF) http://ethesis.helsinki.fi Helsinki 2004 Yliopistopaino ABSTRACT OXIDATION STATE ANALYSES OF URANIUM WITH EMPHASIS ON CHEMICAL SPECIATION IN GEOLOGICAL MEDIA This thesis focuses on chemical methods suitable for the determination of uranium redox species in geological materials. Nd-coprecipitation method was studied for the determination of uranium oxidation states in ground waters. This method is ideally suited for the separation of uranium oxidation states in the fi eld, which means that problems associated with the instability of U(IV) during transport are avoided. An alternative method, such as ion exchange, is recommended for the analysis of high saline and calcium- and iron-rich ground waters. U(IV)/Utot was 2.8- 7.2% in ground waters in oxidizing conditions and 60-93% in anoxic conditions. From thermodynamic model calculations applied to results from anoxic ground waters it was concluded that uranium can act as redox buffer in granitic ground waters. An ion exchange method was developed for the analysis of uranium oxidation states in different solid materials of geological origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Hierarchically-Structured Metalloprotein Composite Coatings Biofabricated from Co-Existing Condensed Liquid Phases
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/837146; this version posted November 10, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Hierarchically-structured metalloprotein composite coatings biofabricated from co-existing condensed liquid phases Franziska Jehle1, Elena Macías-Sánchez1, Peter Fratzl1, Luca Bertinetti1*, Matthew J. Harrington1,2* 1Department oF Biomaterials, Max Planck Institute oF Colloids and InterFaces, Potsdam 14424, Germany 2Department oF Chemistry, McGill University, Montréal, Québec H3A 0B8, Canada *corresponding authors Abstract Complex hierarchical structure governs emergent properties in soFt biopolymeric materials; yet, the material processing involved remains poorly understood. Here, we investigated the multi- scale structure and composition oF the mussel byssus cuticle beFore, during and aFter Formation to gain Further insight into the processing oF this hard, yet extensible metal cross-linked protein composite. Our Findings reveal that the granular substructure crucial to the cuticle’s Function as a wear-resistant coating oF an extensible polymer Fiber is pre-organized in condensed liquid phase secretory vesicles. These are separated into catechol-rich proto-granules enveloped in a sulFur-rich proto-matrix which Fuses during secretion, Forming the sub-structure oF the cuticle. Metal ions are added subsequently in a site-speciFic way, with Fe contained in the sulFur-rich matrix and V being relegated to the granules, coordinated by catechol. We posit that this hierarchical structure selF-organizes via phase separation of speciFic amphiphilic protein components within secretory vesicles, resulting in a meso-scale structuring, critical to the cuticle’s advanced Function.
    [Show full text]