Thanatos & Phobos
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Werklund School of Education Werklund School of Education Research & Publications 2012 Thanatos & Phobos: 'Fear' and its Role in Ken Wilber's Transpersonal Theory Fisher, R. M. In Search of Fearlessness Research Institute Fisher, R. M. (2012). Thanatos & Phobos: 'Fear' and its Role in Ken Wilber's Transpersonal Theory (Technical Paper No.4, 2nd ed.). Calgary, AB: In Search of Fearlessness Research Institute. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/110003 Report Unless otherwise indicated, this material is protected by copyright and has been made available with authorization from the copyright owner. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca Thanatos & Phobos: 'Fear' and its Role in Ken Wilber's Transpersonal Theory R. Michael Fisher, Ph.D. © 1997, 2012 Technical Paper No. 4 In Search of Fearlessness Research Institute 2 Thanatos & Phobos: 'Fear' and its Role in Ken Wilber's Transpersonal Theory R. Michael Fisher, Ph.D. Copyright 1997, 2012 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without permission in writing from the pub- lisher/author. No permission is necessary in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews, or other educational or research purposes. For information and permission address correspond- ence to: In Search of Fearlessness Research Institute 507 S. James St., Carbondale, IL 62901 Contact author: [email protected] First Edition 1997 Second Edition 2012 Cover and layout by R. Michael Fisher ISOF Logo (original 1989) designed by RMF Printed in USA The In Search of Fearlessness Institute is dedicated to research and publishing on fear, fearlessness and emotions in general, as well as critical reviews of such works. Preference is given to works with an integral theoretical perspective. 2 3 Thanatos & Phobos: 'Fear' and its Role in Ken Wilber's Transpersonal Theory - R. Michael Fisher,1 Ph.D. ©1997, 2012 Technical Paper No. 4 PREFACE to the 2nd Edition Re-reading this paper, nearly 16 years later, I realize how totally into theo- retical fearology I was, with Wilber as one author that was under my lens. I was at times, strikingly, if not embarrassingly, quite sure of myself: "I rec- ommend 'fear' be given full-scale attention on educational, medical, psy- cho-social, spiritual and political agendas around the world before the year 2005." It's not that I disagree with myself younger self, it is just strange ob- serving it across time performing, as if performing for the Kosmos itself some kind of puzzlement, but a serious game that is inherent it seems in the very processes of evolution, that even evolution is trying to still figure out. Whatever else is going on here, it is a good demonstration of a critical fearanalysis of one scholars texts. Since 1997, this paper has had little circulation compared to other papers in this series. One of the reasons is that it was submitted to The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology in 1997, and was "lost" and/or "rejected" forth- right by the Editor at the time. Correspondence led to the editor saying they received it and would send it to referees. But over a year later, I tried on several occasions to contact the Editor and no replies came back. Not sure what that meant. Although, I always knew this was a difficult and uncom- fortable paper for most anyone. One reviewer, whom I sent the draft copy to on my own, was very positive about it.2 Yet, reality is, Thanatos and 1 Fisher is co-founder of In Search of Fearlessness Project (1989- ) and Research Institute (1991- ) of which archives can be found at http://www.feareducation.com (click on "Pro- jects"). He is also founder of the Center for Spiritual Inquiry & Integral Education (http://csiie.org), and is Department Head at CSIIE of Integral & 'Fear' Studies. He is a con- sultant, coach and teacher and principal of his own company (http://loveandfearsolutions.com). He can be reached at: [email protected]. 2 Dr. Michael Zimmerman, a Heidegger scholar, wrote after reading it: "Dear Robert, I en- joyed reading your essay on THANATOS AND PHOBOS. You have done a good job of 3 4 Phobos are rather dark and deep subjects and forces to research on. I called them then, for better or for worse, 'Fear'3 (i.e., 'fear' patterns that are meta-motivational dynamics along with 'Love' patterns, that is, Agape and Eros, respectively). So, in simple terms, this is the first paper I know of that deals with the topic of "Wilber on 'Fear'." It is definitely technical, as I was after at the time to get down exactly what Wilber was saying about them ['fear'] throughout his writing up to that date. And even he, admits himself, was somewhat con- fused about these two forces Thanatos (e.g., what Freud focused on) and Phobos (which most theorists ignore). But I was primarily motivated to write this paper after receiving a draft copy of Wilber's Sex, Ecology and Spiritu- ality ms. in 1994, arriving at the door of the In Search of Fearlessness Re- search Institute, in Calgary, AB. Ken and I had corresponded on other work I was doing involving studying his critics and his responses to them, and he thought I'd have some useful comments on the ms. in its earlier form. It was in that ms. that he dealt so thoroughly, and interestingly, with Thana- tos and Phobos. Because my specialty of research and teaching was shap- ing up around fear and fearlessness, it was a great theory I thought he'd been working on. To this day, however, I'll say these topics are still wobbly in my own think- ing and even after Technical Paper No. 4. I welcome readers to enter this challenging study and dialogue with me, and others, on these notions and especially their relevance to what I've called 'Fear' Studies. I suggest, that if we are to truly understand the roots of "evil" (and the Shadow, pathology, oppression-repression dynamics, violence, conflict, and devolution in gen- eral) today and in the future, these great 'Fear' forces cannot be ignored as foundational to the unconscious, or if we do, they'll likely come to bite us in the ass, with horrid consequences. Our new integral fear management sys- tems need an upgrade and Wilber's concepts here are very important as I have argued in other places.4 Unfortunately, and interestingly, Wilber him- tracking down the references to these and related topics in Wilber's writings, and you have shown inconsistencies that he needs to address. Your essay may be improved by defining Thanatos and Phobos earlier, since some readers may not be familiar with these terms, nor with how Wilber uses them. More careful analysis like yours are needed, in order to prod Ken Wilber into being more internally consistent. His publications flow out rapidly when he is writing, and he doesn't always keep his own views straight, not least because those views are constantly evolving. I am very impressed with his work. Thank you for sharing your fine essay with me. I noticed a few misspellings and/or minor grammatical/stylistic prob- lems, but I don't have any major criticism." (pers. comm. July, 29, 1997). 3 See my Technical Papers 1 and 2 for defining why fear and 'fear' are overlapping concepts but distinct (go to: http://csiie.org/mod/page/view.php?id=3). 4 See Fisher, R. M. (2010). Also, I have written several blogs on the topic, but they were deleted by a hacker in 2011; someday, I may re-type them on digital for archiving. The latest series of blogging I did on this in 2012 with Carissa Wieler 4 5 self pretty much stopped publishing more on these two forces after Sex, Ecology and Spirituality (1995) and his short version of it in A Brief History of Everything (1996). That lacuna in his work, uncannily happened as I was writing this paper. It is also telling, that people in the Integral Movement that Wilber has nour- ished and led, also have virtually ignored this topic, as they have with my work. Fear, and 'fear' it seems are too dark and deep for their interests, if not their constitutions. Who knows. What I do know, is that I am a fan of Wilber-pre-1997 (his strong critical/conflict theory phase), and less so af- terwards because he seems to have tried to be more popular (his function- al-pragmatist and post-metaphysical stage) and sacrificed too much in im- portant areas like this understanding of 'Fear.' Three last points worthy to note: one, in my view, one cannot say they un- derstand integral theory (or Integral Theory) and Ken Wilber's core work, if they don't understand these great meta-motivational forces. One cannot be "at integral" either, if they have not incorporated them (i.e., 'Fear') into their practices; and two, I labeled Wilber's work "transpersonal" and that is cer- tainly what it is to a large degree, however, technically and not without some importance, it is more "integral." Wilber himself has written recently that he left the "transpersonal" movement around the early to mid-1980s. He may have in his own ways, but in terms of declaring that overtly in his publishing, I had not seen any evidence he had done so when I worked on this paper 10+ yrs.