Leedingfrom Behind: the Rise and Fall of Green Building

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Implementing Plan C – conservation, curtailment and cooperation NewSolutionsMay-June 2009 Number 18 Change is “green.” Green is used in many Special Report: Part 1 ways and forms – as a noun “green is good,” as an adjective “green building” or LEEDing from Behind: The “green society,” and a verb “we must green the economy.” It also includes the slang Rise and Fall of Green Building version of the verb in the frequent uses of phrases such as “go green,” “green it” and Editor’s Note: The purpose of this, the first Introduction “green up.” of three parts of our Special Report, is to Language sometimes obscures an issue. In the late 1980s interest in energy show the history of the dialogue about LEED Certain “branding” terminology is efficiency and the environment increased. energy performance. Part II will specifically selected with a particularly concise set of The 1987 UN Brundtland Commission’s discuss LEED additional building costs and en- words which form the core of a slogan report defined “sustainable development.” In 1992 the U.S. government’s Energy ergy performance obtained from these costs. or slogans around which a philosophy can be formed, money can be raised and Policy Act included policies for building It will also analyze the USGBC marketing products marketed. One such term that is efficiency. This act called for a 20 percent efforts around this topic. Part III will suggest intended to make us feel we are addressing reduction in energy consumption per options to the LEED rating system. Part II will the challenges of Peak Oil and Climate square foot relative to the 1985 baseline consumption in federal buildings. The be published in June, 2009. government adopted the term “green,” passing several executive orders including three in 1998, 1999, 2000 entitled respec- tively Greening the Government through Waste Prevention, Recycling and Federal Acquisition, Greening the Government through Energy Efficient Management,and Greening the Government through Leader- ship in Environmental Management. At the UIA/AIA (International Union of Architects and American Institute of Architects) World Congress of Architects held in Chicago in June 1993, the presi- dents of the two organizations signed the “Declaration of Interdependence for a Sus- tainable Future.” This convention is recog- nized as a turning point in the history of the green building movement even though the word used was sustainable, not green. It is important to note that sustainable and green are in many cases synonymous. Green has become a word that can be applied to almost anything e.g., a green lifestyle. Its widespread use makes it very difficult to come up with measure- ments that are vital to determining the energy inputs and the waste products of buildings. An old saying,“If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it,” is highly appropriate to describe the state of our May-June 2009 New Solutions Number 18: 1 understanding of energy relative to build- USGBC invented and manages the ings. It is unfortunate that green became Leadership in Energy and Environmental the word of choice for buildings, since there Design (LEED) rating system, used to is terminology available that does a better certify buildings as “green.” Green building job of communicating the environmental – as defined by USGBC – is the practice and energy considerations with which we of increasing the efficiency with which are concerned – energy-efficient, high-per- buildings use resources – energy, water and formance, energy rating, low-energy, energy ...with the use of “green,” the materials – while reducing building impacts savers, etc. Of great importance is that these whims of market considerations on human health and the environment are measurable and comparable. during the building’s lifecycle, through Using the color green instead of mea- prevailed, leaving the population better site placement, design, construction, surements may have led to an unnecessary without the tools to understand operation, maintenance, and removal.3 delay in taking steps to resolve fossil fuel 4 the energy and climate implica- LEED has several rating systems, depletion and environmental issues. The including: term “green-wash” has appeared as a result. tions of its purchasing decisions. New Construction – for high performance Green-wash refers to the fact that the word commercial and institutional projects “green” has become a marketing and sales year that the World Congress of Architects Existing Buildings – Operations and slogan to increase product sales based on a initiated the Declaration of Interdepen- Maintenance – for already built structures theme of doing good to save the planet. dence for a Sustainable Future. USGBC Possibly the term energy efficiency is a non-profit organization, comprised Commercial Interiors – for tenant might have been a good choice and have of design professionals and corporations, improvements provided a more focused direction for set- many from the giant building materials Core & Shell – for sustainable design ting baseline standards for energy use. In industry. Its objective is to “promote build- choices for new core shell construction physics the term efficiency is clearly used ings that are environmentally responsible, Schools – for K-12 schools and other in a variety of contexts, including efficient profitable and healthy places to live and school spaces energy use, energy conversion efficiency, work.” Its mission is “to transform the Retail – for special needs of retail spaces energy conservation, electrical efficiency, way buildings and communities are fuel efficiency, lighting efficiency, mechani- designed, built and operated, enabling an Healthcare – for high performance cal efficiency, volumetric efficiency and environmentally and socially responsible, healthcare facilities thermal efficiency. If energy efficiency healthy and prosperous environment that Homes – for residential construction were used, it would be easy to provide a improves the quality of life.” The USGBC Neighborhood Development – for smart wide range of measurements that define in is a well-funded organization with major growth and new urbanism developments physical terms how efficient a building is, corporations and architectural firms on The LEED system is used to measure such as BTUs per square foot or kWh per its advisory board. Its 2007 revenues were the degree of “greenness” of a building. For square meter. $46,000,000. new construction it is a simple checklist At the core of any kind of genuine The Natural Resources Defense Council building science is a precise scientific with a certain number of points (69 in (NRDC) was involved in the formation 5, 6 terminology that is easy to understand of the USGBC, which began with an LEED 2.2, 110 in LEED 2009). To and could be simplified for general use. alliance between a real-estate developer, achieve the lowest certification, labeled Unfortunately, with the use of “green,” the David Gottfried, and a senior scientist for “certified,” at least twenty-six points are whims of market considerations prevailed, NRDC, Rob Watson. Richard Fedrizzi, required in LEED 2.2 and forty points leaving the population without the tools the current CEO of USGBC is quoted as in LEED 2009. The highest certifica- to understand the energy and climate saying, “The great majority of environ- tion, labeled “platinum,” requires at least implications of its purchasing decisions. mental organizations had invested in keep- fifty-two points in LEED 2.2 and eighty It may be that efficiency as a term is not ing companies on the other side of a fence. points in LEED 2009. Note that the larger robust enough since we often squander the David [Gottfried] thought that we could number of points in LEED 2009 does not savings on bigger houses and bigger (and do things differently. If we could invite reflect a higher level of performance but more) appliances. business to the table, we could develop rather a changing of the numerical weight- standards relative to building performance, ings assigned to various options. Table 1 The U.S. Green Building get buy-in at the very top, and be able to shows the breakdown of the older and Council transform the marketplace (italics mine) newer versions. The percent column shows toward sustainable buildings.”2 The term the different distribution of the LEED The U.S. Green Building Council1 “market transformation” is frequently used classifications between the newer and (USGBC) was founded in 1993, the same by USGBC promoters. older versions. 2 : New Solutions Number 18 May-June 2009 cation began before 2004. A March 2008 in July 2006 for spec developments. LEED LEED Building History New Buildings Institute (NBI) report on for Neighborhood Development, Retail – Number of Units and LEED Energy Performance10 (partially and Healthcare recently became available. Square Feet funded by USGBC) shows a less robust Information from that report is shown in Since the formation of the USGBC in growth rate (Table 3) than that noted in Table 4. 1993 to the end of 2008 the organization Table 2. Table 4: Breakdown of LEED Programs claims to have certified about 2,100 com- The data sets in Tables 2 and 3 are not mercial buildings with a total area of about identical. The NBI data shows that the LEED Program # of Certified Projects 7 283 million square feet. There are about number of buildings certified between the New Construction (NC) 1,600 5 million commercial buildings in the years 2000-2004 (5 years) is 148 units Commercial Interiors (CI) 479 U.S. with a total area of about 74 billion while the USGBC presentation shows 266. Existing Buildings (EB) 200 8 square feet. In the fifteen years of USGBC The USGBC graphics show an impressive Core and Shell (CS) 157 first year jump while the NBI report shows history certified LEED buildings represent Neighborhood Development (ND) 1 a more gradual buildup. The NBI report about 0.04 percent of the total number of Schools 4 existing buildings and about 0.4 percent of shows 165 units and 240 units for 2005 Retail 6 and 2006 respectively while the USGBC the existing square footage.
Recommended publications
  • Incorporating Thick Layers of Exterior Rigid Insulation on Walls

    Incorporating Thick Layers of Exterior Rigid Insulation on Walls

    building science.com © 2014 Building Science Press All rights of reproduction in any form reserved. Measure Guideline: Incorporating Thick Layers of Exterior Rigid Insulation on Walls Building America Report - 1406 November 2014 (rev2. 04/2015) Joseph Lstiburek and Peter Baker Abstract: This measure guideline provides information regarding the design and construction of wall assemblies that are using thick layers of rigid exterior insulation (in excess of 1.5 inches) that require a secondary cladding attachment location exterior of the insulation to be provided. The document is separated into several distinct sections that cover: 1) fundamental building science principles relating to the use of exterior insulation on wall assemblies, 2) design principles for tailoring the use to the specific project goals and requirements, and 3) construction detailing to help with the understanding of how the various elements of the design are implemented. Measure Guideline: Incorporating Thick Layers of Exterior Rigid Insulation on Walls Joseph Lstiburek and Peter Baker Building Science Corporation April 2015 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, subcontractors, or affiliated partners makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof.
  • Understanding Attic Ventilation Penetrations Like Non-Airtight Recessed Lights

    Understanding Attic Ventilation Penetrations Like Non-Airtight Recessed Lights

    Understanding Attic Ventilation penetrations like non-airtight recessed lights. Attics or roofs can be designed and constructed The conductive losses are usually from to be either vented or unvented in any hygro- supply ductwork and equipment located in thermal zone (Map 1). The choice of venting or attic spaces above ceiling insulation not venting is a design and construction choice (ductwork is typically insulated only to R-6 not a requirement determined by the physics or – whereas ceiling insulation levels are by the building code. The model codes allow above R-30). Conductive losses also occur both vented and unvented roof assemblies. The directly through insulation, or where applicable physics impacts the design of attic or insulation is missing or thin. roof systems as does the applicable building code but neither limit the choice. In hot climates, the primary purpose of attic or roof ventilation is to expel solar heated Throughout the balance of this paper the terms hot air from the attic to lessen the building’s attic and roof will and can be used cooling load. interchangeably. The amount of attic cavity ventilation is In cold climates, the primary purpose of attic or specified by numerous ratios of free vent roof ventilation is to maintain a cold roof area to insulated ceiling area ranging from temperature to control ice dams created by 1:150 to 1:600 depending on which building melting snow, and to vent moisture that moves code is consulted, the 1:300 ratio being the from the conditioned space to the attic. Melted most common.
  • Building Science Education Resource Guide

    Building Science Education Resource Guide

    Building Science Education Resource Guide with emphasis on Heat, Air, and Moisture Flows and the Building Enclosure Prepared for: National Renewable Energy Laboratory Prepared by: Cold Climate Housing Program University of Minnesota June 24, 2019 1 2 Table of Contents Section 1. Introduction 5 1a. Project Background 5 1b. Definitions and Terms 5 Resource Types 5 Resource Evaluations 6 1c. Building Science Education Guidelines and Selected Priorities 6 Introduction to Building Science Education Guidelines 6 Selection of Priority Job Classifications 7 Selection of Priority Building Science Topics 8 1d. Project Methodology 9 Section 2. How to Use This Guide 11 2a. For Faculty Teaching Building Science Courses 11 2b. For Faculty Teaching Construction Materials & Methods/ Construction Management/Construction Documentation Courses 11 2c. For Faculty Teaching Environmental Systems/Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Courses 12 2d. For Faculty Teaching a Capstone Course (or Leading a Student Design Competition Team) for High-Performance Buildings 13 Section 3. Building Science Resources 15 3a. Primary Building Science Resources 15 3b. Supplemental Building Science Resources 31 3c. Supportive Building Science Resources 45 Section 4. Guidance for Building Science Infusion 71 4a. Building Science Courses 73 List of Primary Resources 73 Comparison Chart 74 4b. Construction Materials & Methods/Management/Documentation Courses 75 List of Primary Resources 75 Comparison Chart 85 4c. Environmental Systems/Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Courses 87 List of Primary Resources 87 Comparison Chart 97 4d. Capstone Course on High-Performance Whole-Building Design 99 Key Resources for the Priority Building Science Topics 99 Appendix A. Other Supportive Resources 103 3 4 Section 1. Introduction 1a.
  • The Fundability and Marketability of Green Buildings at Public Universities

    The Fundability and Marketability of Green Buildings at Public Universities

    THE FUNDABILITY AND MARKETABILITY OF GREEN BUILDINGS AT PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES: TRANSCENDING THE FUNDING PARADIGM AT CAL POLY A Thesis presented to the Faculty of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Architecture by Eileen E. Joseph October 2009 i © 2009 Eileen E. Joseph ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP TITLE: The Fundability and Marketability of Green Buildings at Public Universities: Transcending the Funding Paradigm at Cal Poly AUTHOR: Eileen E. Joseph DATE SUBMITTED: October 2009 COMMITTEE CHAIR: Margot McDonald, Professor Architecture and Environmental Design COMMITTEE MEMBER: Michael Montoya, Professor Architecture and Environmental Design COMMITTEE MEMBER: Michael Multari, Assistant Director of Planning Facilities Planning & Capital Projects iii ABSTRACT The Fundability and Marketability of Green Buildings at Public Universities Transcending the Funding Paradigm at Cal Poly Eileen E. Joseph While in recent years Cal Poly has moved in the direction of sustainable building, my research indicates that where other CSU’s have succeeded, Cal Poly has been challenged in developing the type of green buildings that would truly make new construction projects more sustainable. The most commonly cited barriers are cost and lack of funding. The outcome however (as evidenced by other CSU’s) is not just driven by the state’s capital outlay process that has historically supported new construction on CSU campuses. It is determined by the priorities, perceptions and values that have influenced Cal Poly’s decision makers and driven campus practices. The purpose of this study is to develop an understanding of and solution for the barriers to green buildings on the Cal Poly campus that can be used as a model for other universities.
  • HIGH-PERFORMANCE Building Conference | March 2, 2016 HOLIDAY INN by the BAY • PORTLAND, ME

    HIGH-PERFORMANCE Building Conference | March 2, 2016 HOLIDAY INN by the BAY • PORTLAND, ME

    A CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS INSTITUTE SPONSORED EVENT ONE-DAY CONFERENCE FOR ARCHITECTS, DESIGNERS, BUILDERS, PROPERTY OWNERS AND FACILITY MANAGERS Designing and constructing for the northeast climate HIGH-PERFORMANCE Building Conference | March 2, 2016 HOLIDAY INN BY THE BAY • PORTLAND, ME Register now! hpb2016.eventbrite.com HOSTED BY: maine.csinet.org Designing and constructing for the northeast climate HIGH-PERFORMANCE Building Conference | March 2, 2016 HOLIDAY INN BY THE BAY • PORTLAND, ME • maine.csinet.org SCHEDULE 6:30–8:15 am Registration 7–8:15 am Continental Breakfast 8:15–8:30 am Official CSI Welcome 8:30-9:30 am SESSION A | Moisture Mitigation in Concrete Floor Slabs Peter Craig, CSI, Concrete Floor Specialist, Silpro 9:30–9:45 am Break 9:45-10:45 am SESSION B | Mock-ups Brian Stroik, Manager, Building Envelope Solution Team, Tremco Sealants & Waterproofing, National Chairman of the Building Enclosure Council 10:45–11 am Break 11 am–12:15 pm SESSION C | Air Vapor Barriers Ken Roko, AIA, Building Enclosure Consultant and Principal, The Facade Group 12:15–1 pm Buffet Luncheon 1–2:30 pm SESSION D | Proper Detailing (NFP285) Richard Keleher, AIA, CSI, LEED AP, Senior Architect, Thompson & Lichtner Company 2:30–3 pm Break 3–4:30 pm SESSION E | Roofing Joseph Lstiburek, Ph.D., P. Eng., ASHRAE Fellow Founder of Building Science Corporation 4:30–5:30 pm Wine/Beer Reception Designing and constructing for the northeast climate HIGH-PERFORMANCE Building Conference | March 2, 2016 HOLIDAY INN BY THE BAY • PORTLAND, ME • maine.csinet.org FAQS What is the High-Performance Building Conference? Hosted by CSI Maine, the High-Performance Building Conference gathers architects, contractors, designers, engineers, facility managers, building owners, and anyone other industry professionals with an interest in learning about building high- performance enclosures in New England.
  • RB104-09/10 R602.7, R602.7.1 (New), Table R602.7.1 (New), Figures R602.7.1(1)-(2) (New)

    RB104-09/10 R602.7, R602.7.1 (New), Table R602.7.1 (New), Figures R602.7.1(1)-(2) (New)

    RB104-09/10 R602.7, R602.7.1 (New), Table R602.7.1 (New), Figures R602.7.1(1)-(2) (New) Proposed Change as Submitted Proponent: Joseph Lstiburek, Building Science Corporation 1. Revise as follows: R602.7 Headers. For header spans see Tables R502.5(1) and R502.5(2). Alternative header applications in accordance with this section shall be permitted. 2. Add new text, table and figures as follows: R602.7.1 Single member headers in exterior bearing walls. Single member headers in exterior bearing walls shall be permitted in accordance with Table R602.7.1. Single headers shall be framed top and bottom with a flat-wise 2x member. To make up the remaining space, cripples shall be installed above the header. See Figure R602.7.1(1). Alternatively, the header can be sized to fill the space between the wall top plate and a flat-wise 2x member. See Figure R602.7.1(2). The header assembly shall bear on a minimum of one jack stud at each end. TABLE R602.7.1 SPANS FOR MINIMUM No.2 GRADE SINGLE HEADER FOR EXTERIOR BEARING WALLSa,b,c SIZE Wood Species GROUND SNOW LOAD (psf) d SINGLE ≤ 20 30 50 HEADERS Building Width (feet)e SUPPORTING 20 28 36 20 28 36 20 28 36 Roof and Ceiling 2x8 Spruce-Pine-Fir 4-10 4-2 3-8 4-3 3-8 3-3 3-7 3-0 2-8 Hem-Fir 5-1 4-4 3-10 4-6 3-10 3-5 3-9 3-2 2-10 Douglas-Fir or Southern Pine 5-3 4-6 4-0 4-7 3-11 3-6 3-10 3-3 2-11 2x10 Spruce-Pine-Fir 6-2 5-3 4-8 5-5 4-8 4-2 4-6 3-11 3-1 Hem-Fir 6-6 5-6 4-11 5-8 4-11 4-4 4-9 4-1 3-7 Douglas-Fir or Southern Pine 6-8 5-8 5-1 5-10 5-0 4-6 4-11 4-2 3-9 2x12 Spruce-Pine-Fir 7-6 6-5 5-9 6-7 5-8
  • Guide to Energy Efficient Homes in Louisiana

    Guide to Energy Efficient Homes in Louisiana

    Guide to Energy Efficient Homes in Louisiana Louisiana Department of Natural Resources Technology Assessment Division Scott A. Angelle, Secretary T. Michael French, Director Paula Ridgeway, Manager Principal Authors James E. Davidson, Sr., CSI Jerry Heinberg, AIA, NCARB Billy Williamson, EIT, EMIT Project Manager David McGee, PE, CEM Technical Review Howard Hershberg, AIA David McGee, PE, CEM Graphics and Layout James E. Davidson, Sr., CSI Jerry Heinberg, AIA, NCARB Billy Williamson, EIT, EMIT Contact For more information on any of the energy services mentioned in this guide, please contact: Technology Assessment Division: Main Number: 225-342-1399 Toll-free: 1-800-836-9589 Fax: 225-342-1397 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.dnr.state.la.us/energy The contents of this manual are offered as guidance. The Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, nor any of its employees, nor any of its contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, and all technical sources referenced in this manual do not (a) make any warranty or representation, express or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained in this report, or that the use of any information, apparatus, method or process disclosed in this report may not infringe privately owned rights; (b) assume any liabilities with respect to the use of, or for damages resulting from the use of any information, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report. This report does not reflect official views or policy of the above mentioned institutions. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
  • Guide to Indoor Air Quality

    Guide to Indoor Air Quality

    Contents Foreword..............................................................................................................................vii Note to Building Owners and Facility Managers .................................................................ix Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................xiii TAB I: BASICS Section 1: About This Document .............................................................................1 Section 2: Factors Affecting Indoor Air Quality........................................................ 5 Sources of Indoor Air Contaminants .....................................................................................5 HVAC System Design and Operation...................................................................................6 Pollutant Pathways and Driving Forces ................................................................................9 Building Occupants .............................................................................................................10 Section 3: Effective Communication...................................................................... 13 Communicating to Prevent IAQ Problems..........................................................................13 Communicating to Resolve IAQ Problems .........................................................................15 TAB II: PREVENTING IAQ PROBLEMS Section 4: Developing an lAQ Profile ...................................................................
  • This Month's Sponsor

    This Month's Sponsor

    CLEVELAND ASHRAE NEWSLETTER September 2012 SEPTEMBER MEETING What Can Cleveland ASHRAE Do For You? September 17, 2012 Speaker: Rob Laneve & Matt Morgan Times: 4:15pm - 5:30pm Board Meeting 5:30pm - 6:15pm Attitude Adjustment Hour! 6:15pm - 7:15pm Dinner 7:15pm - 8:15pm Presentation Location: Harry’s Steakhouse 5664 Brecksville Road Independence, OH 44131 R.S.V.P. via your Constant Contact invitation. Guests are welcome for a $25 meal charge. The beginning of the ASHRAE season is a great time to ask, what do I get for my ASHRAE dues ($265)? This month’s meeting is focused on answering that question. Past President, Rob Laneve, and current president, Matt Morgan will be discussing ASHRAE tools available for Members Only, recent standards updates, design guides available and many other benefits your membership gives you. There will also be the opportunity to voice your opinion on how our chapter operates. We would love to hear the voices of our members. If learning the benefits of ASHRAE weren’t enough to bring you down, how about a free ASHRAE membership? That’s right! We will be raffling off multiple local memberships at this month’s meeting. The only way to win is to show up (not true for the Browns...). So come on down, understand how to get the most bang for your ASHRAE dollar and have a chance to win a free ASHRAE membership! See you then... This Month’s Sponsor If you are interested in sponsoring the newsletter, please contact Jack Malone at 216-391-3700. THE PRESIDENT’S CORNER BY MATT MORGAN OFFICERS & COMMITTEE CHAIRMEN 2012-2013 Officers and Board of Governors President Matt Morgan President Elect Scott Dusenbury Treasurer Doug Barnes Secretary James Dudt Two things seem fairly certain each fall: ASHRAE comes up faster than you think and the Board of Governors Browns find a way to lose their home opener.
  • 2005 January

    2005 January

    VOLUME XLIII - NUMBER 4 JAN 2005 January Meeting Details January Program Our only lunch meeting of the year! Current HVAC Design Issues in Date: Thursday, January 13, 2005 Data Centers Place: The Carnelian Room 555 California Street, Bank of America Building, San Francisco Take an express elevator from the Montgomery Street entrance level to the 52nd floor Schedule: 11:30 AM - 12:00 PM - Registration 12:00 - 12:40 PM - Lunch with Announcements and Introductions 12:40 – 12:50 Break 12:50 - 1:30 PM Main program Cost: $35 for members and guests reserved by John Pappas, P.E., Mazzetti & Associates Monday, January 10 at noon Power density in data centers continues to rise, creating Students – No charge, but please reserve a new challenges for HVAC designers and encouraging the spot development of new system and equipment Voucher – No additional charge, but please technologies. Using tools like thermo-cameras to reserve a spot. Purchase 8 meetings and get understand thermodynamics within a data center, we can 9 for $280.00. better understand, with regard to power density, where we have been, where we are now, and where we are $42 for non-members, late reservations, going. Most facilities do not have the option of “starting and at the door over” with their cooling systems as power density in the space increases, so we will present data center cooling Please make your reservation via our website. schemes that address most all of the issues and can be Visit the Event Calendar at implemented at existing facilities. http://www.ggashrae.org/calendr.htm, click on January 13, and fill out and submit the form.
  • Northeastaire: January 2010

    Northeastaire: January 2010

    NORTHEASTAIRE ASHRAE - American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers Boston Chapter, Region 1 www.ashraeboston.org XXXXVI No. 85 January 2009 Editor: Stacie Suh TEL: 781-258-1002 2009 - 2010 Officers MAIN MEETING Don’t Do Stupid Things Bryan Hermanny Tuesday, January 12, 2010 President Bill Garvey President-Elect & Treasurer Pat Duffy Vice-President Joseph Lstiburek will provide an entertaining and provocative examination of building problems based on a lifetime of experiences "stuff you don't find in books." Dr. Lstiburek in the course of his career has been involved in almost all of the key com- Stephen Nicholas mercial and residential "failure cause célèbre" issues over the past three decades: car- Secretary bon monoxide poisoning, radon, hardboard siding, OSB siding, fire retardant treated plywood, EIFS, the mold litigation explosion, IAQ failures, floor finishing failures, vinyl wall coverings, building papers and house wraps, celebrity architects and now LEED. He has concluded that people are weird, women are different then men, folks Table of Contents don't always tell the truth but that physics never lies. And that none of this matters to Monthly Meeting 1 juries. See page 4 for meet the speaker section. President’s Message 2 Editor’s Note 2 DATE: Tuesday, January 12, 2009 PDH CREDITS CTTC - TEGA 3 MEETING Steve Nicholas REMINDER Historian’s Column 4 MANAGER: [email protected] Research Promotion 4 Effective September 2009, Meet the Speaker 4 LOCATION : Doubletree Guest Suites there will be a $15 fee for each Society News 5 550 Winter Street PDH certificate provided at our Student Activities 5 Waltham, MA 02451 Chapter meetings for non- Meeting Recap 6 Chapter members.
  • Measure Guideline: Incorporating Thick Layers of Exterior Rigid Insulation on Walls Joseph Lstiburek and Peter Baker Building Science Corporation

    Measure Guideline: Incorporating Thick Layers of Exterior Rigid Insulation on Walls Joseph Lstiburek and Peter Baker Building Science Corporation

    Measure Guideline: Incorporating Thick Layers of Exterior Rigid Insulation on Walls Joseph Lstiburek and Peter Baker Building Science Corporation April 2015 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, subcontractors, or affiliated partners makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. Available electronically at http://www.osti.gov/scitech Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062 phone: 865.576.8401 fax: 865.576.5728 email: mailto:[email protected] Available for sale to the public, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 phone: 800.553.6847 fax: 703.605.6900 email: [email protected] online ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/help/ordermethods.aspx Measure Guideline: Incorporating Thick Layers of Exterior Rigid Insulation on Walls Prepared for: The National Renewable Energy Laboratory On behalf of the U.S.