Jian XIAO Positivité En Géométrie Kählérienne Positivity in Kähler

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jian XIAO Positivité En Géométrie Kählérienne Positivity in Kähler THÈSE Pour obtenir le grade de DOCTEUR DE LA COMMUNAUTÉ UNIVERSITÉ GRENOBLE ALPES Spécialité : Mathématiques Arrêté ministériel : 25 mai 2016 Présentée par Jian XIAO Thèse dirigée par Jean-pierre DEMAILLY, préparée au sein du Laboratoire Institut Fourier dans l'École Doctorale Mathématiques, Sciences et technologies de l'information, Informatique Positivité en géométrie kählérienne Positivity in Kähler geometry Thèse soutenue publiquement le 23 mai 2016, devant le jury composé de : Monsieur JEAN-PIERRE DEMAILLY PROFESSEUR, UNIVERSITE GRENOBLE ALPES, Directeur de thèse Monsieur JIXIANG FU PROFESSEUR, UNIVERSITE DE FUDAN (SHANGHAI) - CHINE, Examinateur Monsieur SEBASTIEN BOUCKSOM DIRECTEUR DE RECHERCHE, CNRS DELEGATION ILE-DE-FRANCE SUD, Rapporteur Monsieur VALENTINO TOSATTI PROFESSEUR, UNIVERSITE DE NORTHWESTERN - ETATS-UNIS, Rapporteur Monsieur PHILIPPE EYSSIDIEUX PROFESSEUR, UNIVERSITE GRENOBLE ALPES, Examinateur Monsieur MATEI TOMA PROFESSEUR, UNIVERSITE DE LORRAINE, Président Positivité en géométrie kählerienne Jian Xiao 5 mai 2016 Acknowledgements First of all I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisors Professor Jean-Pierre Demailly (Université Grenoble Alpes) and Professor Jixiang Fu (Fudan University) for their invaluable guidance and support in the past years. My warmest thanks go to them. I would also like to thank Sébastien Boucksom, Michel Brion, Junyan Cao, Ya Deng, Philippe Eys- sidieux, Zhizhong Huang, Qingchun Ji, Mehdi Lejmi, Xiaonan Ma, Wenhao Ou, Matei Toma, Zhizhang Wang and Can Zhang for interesting and useful conversations, and thank Tristan C. Collins, Mattias Jonsson and Valentino Tosatti for suggestions and comments. Special acknowledgments are due to Brian Lehmann. A large part of this thesis is based on our joint work. I learnt a lot through the discussions with him. It is my great honor that Sébastien Boucksom, Stéphane Druel, Philippe Eyssidieux, Matei Toma and Valentino Tosatti are my committee members. I have been benefiting a lot by studying their works. In particular, I would like to thank Sébastien and Valentino for their helpful comments and corrections on this memoir. My PhD work has been conducted successively at Fudan University and Université Grenoble Alpes : this is a joint PhD thesis defended under the auspices of both math departments, with support from the China Scholarship Council and Institut Fourier. I am very grateful for their support. I would like to thank my lovely friends at Fudan University and Université Grenoble Alpes who have contributed to make my life interesting, and express my gratitude to the secretaries at both places who have made much of my work easier. Lastly I would like to thank my family for their love and support, this thesis is dedicated to them. 3 Table des matières 1 Introduction (Français)7 2 Introduction 20 3 Teissier’s proportionality problem over compact Kähler manifolds 33 3.1 Introduction.......................................... 34 3.2 Proof of the main theorem.................................. 35 3.3 Applications to the balanced cone.............................. 41 3.3.1 Background and main applications......................... 41 3.3.2 Injectivity : application of Theorem 3.1.1..................... 42 3.3.3 Surjectivity : the image of the boundary of Kähler cone............. 42 3.3.4 Characterization on a nef class being Kähler.................... 46 3.3.5 Appendix....................................... 48 4 Transcendental Morse inequalities over compact Kähler manifolds 50 4.1 Introduction.......................................... 51 4.2 Technical preliminaries.................................... 54 4.2.1 Monge-Ampère equation on compact Hermitian manifolds............ 54 4.2.2 Lamari’s lemma.................................... 54 4.2.3 Resolution of singularities of positive currents................... 54 4.2.4 Movable cohomology classes............................. 55 4.2.5 Movable intersections................................ 56 4.3 Proof of the main results................................... 56 4.3.1 Theorem 4.1.4.................................... 56 4.3.2 Theorem 4.1.10 and Theorem 4.1.13........................ 59 4.3.3 Theorem 4.1.15.................................... 64 4.4 Applications to a conjecture of Lejmi and Székelyhidi................... 65 4.4.1 Background and main applications......................... 65 4.4.2 Proof of the main applications........................... 66 4.4.3 Further discussions.................................. 68 4.5 Appendix........................................... 69 5 Characterizing volume via cone duality 72 5.1 Introduction.......................................... 73 5.2 Characterizing volume for divisors............................. 75 5.2.1 Technical preliminaries................................ 75 5.2.2 Volume characterization............................... 79 5.3 Volume functional for 1-cycles................................ 81 5.3.1 Definition and properties.............................. 81 5.3.2 Relation with mobility................................ 83 5.3.3 Towards Fujita approximation for 1-cycles..................... 85 5.4 Further discussions...................................... 90 5 6 Positivité en géométrie kählerienne 5.4.1 Another invariant of movable class......................... 90 5.4.2 A general approach.................................. 91 6 Zariski decomposition of curves on algebraic varieties 92 6.1 Introduction.......................................... 93 6.1.1 Examples....................................... 94 6.1.2 Volume and mobility................................. 95 6.1.3 Formal Zariski decompositions........................... 96 6.1.4 Other applications.................................. 97 6.1.5 Outline........................................ 98 6.2 Preliminaries......................................... 99 6.2.1 Khovanskii-Teissier inequalities........................... 100 6.2.2 Complete intersection cone............................. 101 6.2.3 Fields of characteristic p ............................... 102 6.2.4 Compact Kähler manifolds............................. 103 6.3 Polar transforms....................................... 103 6.3.1 Duality transforms.................................. 103 6.3.2 Differentiability.................................... 106 6.4 Formal Zariski decompositions................................ 109 6.4.1 Teissier proportionality............................... 112 6.4.2 Morse-type inequality................................ 114 6.4.3 Boundary conditions................................. 116 6.5 Positivity for curves..................................... 117 6.5.1 Basic properties.................................... 117 6.5.2 Zariski decompositions for curves.......................... 118 6.5.3 Strict log concavity.................................. 119 6.5.4 Differentiability.................................... 120 6.5.5 Negative parts.................................... 121 6.5.6 Birational behavior.................................. 122 6.5.7 Morse-type inequality for curves.......................... 123 6.6 Positive products and movable curves............................ 124 6.6.1 The volume function on big and movable divisors................. 125 6.6.2 The function M .................................... 127 6.7 Comparing the complete intersection cone and the movable cone............ 131 6.8 Toric varieties......................................... 134 6.8.1 Positive product on toric varieties.......................... 134 6.8.2 The function M .................................... 134 6.8.3 Zariski decompositions................................ 136 6.9 Hyperkähler manifolds.................................... 137 6.10 Comparison with mobility.................................. 139 6.10.1 Weighted mobility.................................. 142 6.11 Applications to birational geometry............................. 143 6.11.1 Seshadri constants.................................. 143 6.11.2 Rationally connected varieties............................ 145 6.12 Appendix A.......................................... 146 6.12.1 Reverse Khovanskii-Teissier inequalities...................... 146 6.12.2 Towards the transcendental holomorphic Morse inequality............ 147 6.13 Appendix B.......................................... 148 6.13.1 Non-convexity of the complete intersection cone.................. 148 Chapitre 1 Introduction (Français) L’objectif de cette thèse est d’étudier divers concepts de positivité en géométrie kählerienne. En par- ticulier, pour une variété kählerienne compacte de dimension n, nous étudions la positivité des classes transcendantes de type (1; 1) et (n − 1; n − 1) – ces classes comprennent donc en particulier les classes de diviseurs et les classes de courbes. Les résultats principaux présentés dans ce mémoire sont basés sur les articles suivants que j’ai rédigés au cours de mes études de doctorat : 1. (avec Brian Lehmann) Zariski decomposition of curves on algebraic varieties. arXiv preprint 2015, arXiv : 1507.04316, soumis. 2. A remark on the convergence of inverse σk-flow, arXiv preprint 2015, arXiv : 1505.04999, Comptes Rendus Mathématique 354 (2016) 395-399. 3. Characterizing volume via cone duality, arXiv preprint 2015, arXiv : 1502.06450, soumis. 4. (avec Jixiang Fu) Teissier’s problem on proportionality of nef and big classes over a compact Kähler manifold, arXiv preprint 2014, arXiv : 1410.4878, soumis. 5. Movable intersections and bigness criterion, arXiv preprint 2014, arXiv : 1405.1582. 6. Weak transcendental
Recommended publications
  • Stability of Tautological Bundles on Symmetric Products of Curves
    STABILITY OF TAUTOLOGICAL BUNDLES ON SYMMETRIC PRODUCTS OF CURVES ANDREAS KRUG Abstract. We prove that, if C is a smooth projective curve over the complex numbers, and E is a stable vector bundle on C whose slope does not lie in the interval [−1, n − 1], then the associated tautological bundle E[n] on the symmetric product C(n) is again stable. Also, if E is semi-stable and its slope does not lie in the interval (−1, n − 1), then E[n] is semi-stable. Introduction Given a smooth projective curve C over the complex numbers, there is an interesting series of related higher-dimensional smooth projective varieties, namely the symmetric products C(n). For every vector bundle E on C of rank r, there is a naturally associated vector bundle E[n] of rank rn on the symmetric product C(n), called tautological or secant bundle. These tautological bundles carry important geometric information. For example, k-very ampleness of line bundles can be expressed in terms of the associated tautological bundles, and these bundles play an important role in the proof of the gonality conjecture of Ein and Lazarsfeld [EL15]. Tautological bundles on symmetric products of curves have been studied since the 1960s [Sch61, Sch64, Mat65], but there are still new results about these bundles discovered nowadays; see, for example, [Wan16, MOP17, BD18]. A natural problem is to decide when a tautological bundle is stable. Here, stability means (n−1) (n) slope stability with respect to the ample class Hn that is represented by C +x ⊂ C for any x ∈ C; see Subsection 1.3 for details.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristic Classes and K-Theory Oscar Randal-Williams
    Characteristic classes and K-theory Oscar Randal-Williams https://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/∼or257/teaching/notes/Kthy.pdf 1 Vector bundles 1 1.1 Vector bundles . 1 1.2 Inner products . 5 1.3 Embedding into trivial bundles . 6 1.4 Classification and concordance . 7 1.5 Clutching . 8 2 Characteristic classes 10 2.1 Recollections on Thom and Euler classes . 10 2.2 The projective bundle formula . 12 2.3 Chern classes . 14 2.4 Stiefel–Whitney classes . 16 2.5 Pontrjagin classes . 17 2.6 The splitting principle . 17 2.7 The Euler class revisited . 18 2.8 Examples . 18 2.9 Some tangent bundles . 20 2.10 Nonimmersions . 21 3 K-theory 23 3.1 The functor K ................................. 23 3.2 The fundamental product theorem . 26 3.3 Bott periodicity and the cohomological structure of K-theory . 28 3.4 The Mayer–Vietoris sequence . 36 3.5 The Fundamental Product Theorem for K−1 . 36 3.6 K-theory and degree . 38 4 Further structure of K-theory 39 4.1 The yoga of symmetric polynomials . 39 4.2 The Chern character . 41 n 4.3 K-theory of CP and the projective bundle formula . 44 4.4 K-theory Chern classes and exterior powers . 46 4.5 The K-theory Thom isomorphism, Euler class, and Gysin sequence . 47 n 4.6 K-theory of RP ................................ 49 4.7 Adams operations . 51 4.8 The Hopf invariant . 53 4.9 Correction classes . 55 4.10 Gysin maps and topological Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch . 58 Last updated May 22, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamental Algebraic Geometry
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/surv/123 hematical Surveys and onographs olume 123 Fundamental Algebraic Geometry Grothendieck's FGA Explained Barbara Fantechi Lothar Gottsche Luc lllusie Steven L. Kleiman Nitin Nitsure AngeloVistoli American Mathematical Society U^VDED^ EDITORIAL COMMITTEE Jerry L. Bona Peter S. Landweber Michael G. Eastwood Michael P. Loss J. T. Stafford, Chair 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 14-01, 14C20, 13D10, 14D15, 14K30, 18F10, 18D30. For additional information and updates on this book, visit www.ams.org/bookpages/surv-123 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Fundamental algebraic geometry : Grothendieck's FGA explained / Barbara Fantechi p. cm. — (Mathematical surveys and monographs, ISSN 0076-5376 ; v. 123) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8218-3541-6 (pbk. : acid-free paper) ISBN 0-8218-4245-5 (soft cover : acid-free paper) 1. Geometry, Algebraic. 2. Grothendieck groups. 3. Grothendieck categories. I Barbara, 1966- II. Mathematical surveys and monographs ; no. 123. QA564.F86 2005 516.3'5—dc22 2005053614 Copying and reprinting. Individual readers of this publication, and nonprofit libraries acting for them, are permitted to make fair use of the material, such as to copy a chapter for use in teaching or research. Permission is granted to quote brief passages from this publication in reviews, provided the customary acknowledgment of the source is given. Republication, systematic copying, or multiple reproduction of any material in this publication is permitted only under license from the American Mathematical Society. Requests for such permission should be addressed to the Acquisitions Department, American Mathematical Society, 201 Charles Street, Providence, Rhode Island 02904-2294, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Algebraic Curves and Surfaces
    Notes for Curves and Surfaces Instructor: Robert Freidman Henry Liu April 25, 2017 Abstract These are my live-texed notes for the Spring 2017 offering of MATH GR8293 Algebraic Curves & Surfaces . Let me know when you find errors or typos. I'm sure there are plenty. 1 Curves on a surface 1 1.1 Topological invariants . 1 1.2 Holomorphic invariants . 2 1.3 Divisors . 3 1.4 Algebraic intersection theory . 4 1.5 Arithmetic genus . 6 1.6 Riemann{Roch formula . 7 1.7 Hodge index theorem . 7 1.8 Ample and nef divisors . 8 1.9 Ample cone and its closure . 11 1.10 Closure of the ample cone . 13 1.11 Div and Num as functors . 15 2 Birational geometry 17 2.1 Blowing up and down . 17 2.2 Numerical invariants of X~ ...................................... 18 2.3 Embedded resolutions for curves on a surface . 19 2.4 Minimal models of surfaces . 23 2.5 More general contractions . 24 2.6 Rational singularities . 26 2.7 Fundamental cycles . 28 2.8 Surface singularities . 31 2.9 Gorenstein condition for normal surface singularities . 33 3 Examples of surfaces 36 3.1 Rational ruled surfaces . 36 3.2 More general ruled surfaces . 39 3.3 Numerical invariants . 41 3.4 The invariant e(V ).......................................... 42 3.5 Ample and nef cones . 44 3.6 del Pezzo surfaces . 44 3.7 Lines on a cubic and del Pezzos . 47 3.8 Characterization of del Pezzo surfaces . 50 3.9 K3 surfaces . 51 3.10 Period map . 54 a 3.11 Elliptic surfaces .
    [Show full text]
  • On Positivity and Base Loci of Vector Bundles
    ON POSITIVITY AND BASE LOCI OF VECTOR BUNDLES THOMAS BAUER, SÁNDOR J KOVÁCS, ALEX KÜRONYA, ERNESTO CARLO MISTRETTA, TOMASZ SZEMBERG, STEFANO URBINATI 1. INTRODUCTION The aim of this note is to shed some light on the relationships among some notions of posi- tivity for vector bundles that arose in recent decades. Positivity properties of line bundles have long played a major role in projective geometry; they have once again become a center of attention recently, mainly in relation with advances in birational geometry, especially in the framework of the Minimal Model Program. Positivity of line bundles has often been studied in conjunction with numerical invariants and various kinds of asymptotic base loci (see for example [ELMNP06] and [BDPP13]). At the same time, many positivity notions have been introduced for vector bundles of higher rank, generalizing some of the properties that hold for line bundles. While the situation in rank one is well-understood, at least as far as the interdepencies between the various positivity concepts is concerned, we are quite far from an analogous state of affairs for vector bundles in general. In an attempt to generalize bigness for the higher rank case, some positivity properties have been put forward by Viehweg (in the study of fibrations in curves, [Vie83]), and Miyaoka (in the context of surfaces, [Miy83]), and are known to be different from the generalization given by using the tautological line bundle on the projectivization of the considered vector bundle (cf. [Laz04]). The differences between the various definitions of bigness are already present in the works of Lang concerning the Green-Griffiths conjecture (see [Lan86]).
    [Show full text]
  • Manifolds of Low Dimension with Trivial Canonical Bundle in Grassmannians Vladimiro Benedetti
    Manifolds of low dimension with trivial canonical bundle in Grassmannians Vladimiro Benedetti To cite this version: Vladimiro Benedetti. Manifolds of low dimension with trivial canonical bundle in Grassmannians. Mathematische Zeitschrift, Springer, 2018. hal-01362172v3 HAL Id: hal-01362172 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01362172v3 Submitted on 26 May 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License Manifolds of low dimension with trivial canonical bundle in Grassmannians Vladimiro Benedetti∗ May 27, 2017 Abstract We study fourfolds with trivial canonical bundle which are zero loci of sections of homogeneous, completely reducible bundles over ordinary and classical complex Grassmannians. We prove that the only hyper-K¨ahler fourfolds among them are the example of Beauville and Donagi, and the example of Debarre and Voisin. In doing so, we give a complete classifi- cation of those varieties. We include also the analogous classification for surfaces and threefolds. Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Preliminaries 3 3 FourfoldsinordinaryGrassmannians 5 4 Fourfolds in classical Grassmannians 13 5 Thecasesofdimensionstwoandthree 23 A Euler characteristic 25 B Tables 30 1 Introduction In Complex Geometry there are interesting connections between special vari- eties and homogeneous spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chern Characteristic Classes
    The Chern characteristic classes Y. X. Zhao I. FUNDAMENTAL BUNDLE OF QUANTUM MECHANICS Consider a nD Hilbert space H. Qauntum states are normalized vectors in H up to phase factors. Therefore, more exactly a quantum state j i should be described by the density matrix, the projector to the 1D subspace generated by j i, P = j ih j: (I.1) n−1 All quantum states P comprise the projective space P H of H, and pH ≈ CP . If we exclude zero point from H, there is a natural projection from H − f0g to P H, π : H − f0g ! P H: (I.2) On the other hand, there is a tautological line bundle T (P H) over over P H, where over the point P the fiber T is the complex line generated by j i. Therefore, there is the pullback line bundle π∗L(P H) over H − f0g and the line bundle morphism, π~ π∗T (P H) T (P H) π H − f0g P H . Then, a bundle of Hilbert spaces E over a base space B, which may be a parameter space, such as momentum space, of a quantum system, or a phase space. We can repeat the above construction for a single Hilbert space to the vector bundle E with zero section 0B excluded. We obtain the projective bundle PEconsisting of points (P x ; x) (I.3) where j xi 2 Hx; x 2 B: (I.4) 2 Obviously, PE is a bundle over B, p : PE ! B; (I.5) n−1 where each fiber (PE)x ≈ CP .
    [Show full text]
  • WITT GROUPS of GRASSMANN VARIETIES Contents Introduction 1
    WITT GROUPS OF GRASSMANN VARIETIES PAUL BALMER AND BAPTISTE CALMES` Abstract. We compute the total Witt groups of (split) Grassmann varieties, over any regular base X. The answer is a free module over the total Witt ring of X. We provide an explicit basis for this free module, which is indexed by a special class of Young diagrams, that we call even Young diagrams. Contents Introduction 1 1. Combinatorics of Grassmann and flag varieties 4 2. Even Young diagrams 7 3. Generators of the total Witt group 12 4. Cellular decomposition 15 5. Push-forward, pull-back and connecting homomorphism 19 6. Main result 21 Appendix A. Total Witt group 27 References 27 Introduction At first glance, it might be surprising for the non-specialist that more than thirty years after the definition of the Witt group of a scheme, by Knebusch [13], the Witt group of such a classical variety as a Grassmannian has not been computed yet. This is especially striking since analogous results for ordinary cohomologies, for K-theory and for Chow groups have been settled a long time ago. The goal of this article is to explain how Witt groups differ from these sister theories and to prove the following: Main Theorem (See Thm. 6.1). Let X be a regular noetherian and separated 1 scheme over Z[ 2 ], of finite Krull dimension. Let 0 <d<n be integers and let GrX (d, n) be the Grassmannian of d-dimensional subbundles of the trivial n- n dimensional vector bundle V = OX over X. (More generally, we treat any vector bundle V admitting a complete flag of subbundles.) Then the total Witt group of GrX (d, n) is a free graded module over the total Witt group of X with an explicit basis indexed by so-called “even” Young diagrams.
    [Show full text]
  • Moduli of K3 Surfaces and Irreducible Symplectic Manifolds
    Moduli of K3 Surfaces and Irreducible Symplectic Manifolds V. Gritsenko, K. Hulek and G.K. Sankaran Abstract The name “K3 surfaces” was coined by A. Weil in 1957 when he formu- lated a research programme for these surfaces and their moduli. Since then, irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifolds have been intro- duced as a higher dimensional analogue of K3 surfaces. In this paper we present a review of this theory starting from the definition of K3 surfaces and going as far as the global Torelli theorem for irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifolds as recently proved by M. Verbitsky. For many years the last open question of Weil’s programme was that of the geometric type of the moduli spaces of polarised K3 surfaces. We explain how this problem has been solved. Our method uses algebraic geometry, modular forms and Borcherds automorphic products. We collect and discuss the relevant facts from the theory of modular forms with respect to the orthogonal group O(2,n). We also give a detailed description of quasi pull-back of automorphic Borcherds products. This part contains previously unpublished results. Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Periods of K3 surfaces and the Torelli theorem 4 3 Irreducible symplectic manifolds 15 4 Projective models 24 arXiv:1012.4155v2 [math.AG] 26 May 2011 5 Compactifications 26 6 Modular forms and Kodaira dimension 39 7 Orthogonal groups and reflections 46 8 The quasi pull-back of modular forms 51 9 Arithmetic of root systems 59 1 1 Introduction The history of K3 surfaces goes back to classical algebraic geometry. In modern complex algebraic geometry a K3 surface is a compact complex surface S whose canonical bundle is trivial, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • 35 Line Bundles on Cpn
    35 Line Bundles on CPn n n Recall CP = {[z0 : z1 : ... : zn]}. Here CP , the set of all complex lines passing through the origin, is defined to a quotient space Cn+1 −{0}/ ∼ where n+1 (z0, z1, ..., zn), (z0, z1, ..., zn) ∈ C −{0} z , z , ..., z λ z , z , ..., z λ ∈ C −{ } are equivalent if and only if ( 0 1 ne)=e ( 0 e 1 n) with 0 . 1 Holomorphic line bundle of degree k over CP The holomorphic line bundle OCP1 (k) 1 e e e 1 of degree k ∈ Z over CP is constructed explicitly as follows. Let CP = U0 ∪ U1 be the standard open covering. Using the standard atlas, take two “trivial” pieces U0 × C and 0 1 i U1 × C with coordinates (z0,ζ ) and (z1,ζ ) where zi is the base coordinate of Ui and ζ is ∗ 1 the fibre coordinate over Ui - and “glue them together” over the set C = CP \{0, ∞} by the identification 1 1 0 ζ z0 = , ζ = k . (121) z1 (z1) This line bundle is usually denoted OCP1 (k), or simply O(k) for brevity. The total space k k H of O(k) is the identification space; thus H consists of the disjoint union U0 U1 of 2 0 1 two copies of C = C × C, with respective coordinates (z0,ζ ) and (z1,ζ ), which have been ∗ ` glued together along C × C according to (121). The transition function from z0 to z1 is 1 g01(z0)= k ; (z0) 1 the other is g10(z1)= (z1)k . n CPn In general for higher dimensional case, let {U} = {Uα}α=0 be the standard atlas on .
    [Show full text]
  • Intersection Theory
    APPENDIX A Intersection Theory In this appendix we will outline the generalization of intersection theory and the Riemann-Roch theorem to nonsingular projective varieties of any dimension. To motivate the discussion, let us look at the case of curves and surfaces, and then see what needs to be generalized. For a divisor D on a curve X, leaving out the contribution of Serre duality, we can write the Riemann-Roch theorem (IV, 1.3) as x(.!Z'(D)) = deg D + 1 - g, where xis the Euler characteristic (III, Ex. 5.1). On a surface, we can write the Riemann-Roch theorem (V, 1.6) as 1 x(!l'(D)) = 2 D.(D - K) + 1 + Pa· In each case, on the left-hand side we have something involving cohomol­ ogy groups of the sheaf !l'(D), while on the right-hand side we have some numerical data involving the divisor D, the canonical divisor K, and some invariants of the variety X. Of course the ultimate aim of a Riemann-Roch type theorem is to compute the dimension of the linear system IDI or of lnDI for large n (II, Ex. 7.6). This is achieved by combining a formula for x(!l'(D)) with some vanishing theorems for Hi(X,!l'(D)) fori > 0, such as the theorems of Serre (III, 5.2) or Kodaira (III, 7.15). We will now generalize these results so as to give an expression for x(!l'(D)) on a nonsingular projective variety X of any dimension. And while we are at it, with no extra effort we get a formula for x(t&"), where @" is any coherent locally free sheaf.
    [Show full text]
  • Vector Bundles and Projective Varieties
    VECTOR BUNDLES AND PROJECTIVE VARIETIES by NICHOLAS MARINO Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Mathematics, Applied Mathematics, and Statistics CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY January 2019 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY Department of Mathematics, Applied Mathematics, and Statistics We hereby approve the thesis of Nicholas Marino Candidate for the degree of Master of Science Committee Chair Nick Gurski Committee Member David Singer Committee Member Joel Langer Date of Defense: 10 December, 2018 1 Contents Abstract 3 1 Introduction 4 2 Basic Constructions 5 2.1 Elementary Definitions . 5 2.2 Line Bundles . 8 2.3 Divisors . 12 2.4 Differentials . 13 2.5 Chern Classes . 14 3 Moduli Spaces 17 3.1 Some Classifications . 17 3.2 Stable and Semi-stable Sheaves . 19 3.3 Representability . 21 4 Vector Bundles on Pn 26 4.1 Cohomological Tools . 26 4.2 Splitting on Higher Projective Spaces . 27 4.3 Stability . 36 5 Low-Dimensional Results 37 5.1 2-bundles and Surfaces . 37 5.2 Serre's Construction and Hartshorne's Conjecture . 39 5.3 The Horrocks-Mumford Bundle . 42 6 Ulrich Bundles 44 7 Conclusion 48 8 References 50 2 Vector Bundles and Projective Varieties Abstract by NICHOLAS MARINO Vector bundles play a prominent role in the study of projective algebraic varieties. Vector bundles can describe facets of the intrinsic geometry of a variety, as well as its relationship to other varieties, especially projective spaces. Here we outline the general theory of vector bundles and describe their classification and structure. We also consider some special bundles and general results in low dimensions, especially rank 2 bundles and surfaces, as well as bundles on projective spaces.
    [Show full text]