Emergency Communication for Deaf and Hard of Hearing
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Emergency Communication Effectiveness for Deaf and Hard of Hearing in Victoria, Australia An Interactive Qualifying Project proposal to be submitted to the faculty of Worcester Polytechnic Institute in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science Submitted by: Timothy Flynn Samantha Kingsley Jeffrey Marrion Kelly Roberge Submitted to: Project Advisors: Prof. Peter Christopher Prof. Lauren Mathews Project Liaison: Graeme Kelly, Victorian Deaf Society April 30th 2010 ABSTRACT This project, motivated partly by the recent bushfires, was prepared in cooperation with the Victorian Deaf Society in Melbourne, Australia to evaluate the effectiveness of Victoria’s emergency communication system for the Deaf and hard of hearing. The project team compared emergency communication systems in Australia with those of other countries, including the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. We conducted onsite interviews and surveys with the Deaf and hard of hearing of Victoria and contacted other important stakeholders. Then, we proposed recommendations to the Victorian Deaf Society aimed to help implement changes that would better alert the Deaf and hard of hearing during emergencies. i ACKNOWLEGEMENTS The team would like to acknowledge the individuals who have helped and guided us through our work, both before and during our time in Melbourne. It is with their assistance that we are able to present this finished report to the Victorian Deaf Society (Vicdeaf) and to Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI). Firstly, we would like to thank the CEO of Vicdeaf, Graeme Kelly, for giving us the opportunity to work for this organization. He provided us with the problem statement and suggested areas of research in order to have a thorough report. In addition, Mr. Kelly provided us with helpful feedback on our proposal as well as suggestions for valuable contacts. We would also like to thank David Peters for his help with our project. Mr. Peters is an Information Officer for Vicdeaf as well as a respected and well known member of the Deaf community. He was able to give us useful feedback on our project and played a significant role in contacting the Deaf and hard of hearing in Victoria. His help was monumental in obtaining the opinions and suggestions of this Deaf community. We want thank our advisors, Professors Peter Christopher and Lauren Mathews, for their feedback through both our proposal and our report. Their guidance has helped to make this report a detailed and comprehensive document. We would also like to thank Professor Stephen McCauley who directed us through our initial research and in the preliminary stages of our project; his assistance gave us a strong foundation for the rest of our work. We also appreciate the work of Professor Holly Ault, the Project Center Director, for providing us with the opportunity to come to Melbourne to do this work with Vicdeaf, as well as introducing us to Australia‟s history and culture. We would also like to thank Dr. Prapaipit C. Ternai, our Local Coordinator. We want to thank Heesun Lee of Vicdeaf for all of her assistance throughout our time in Melbourne. She was a valuable resource in helping us to arrange interpreters and rooms for all of our meetings and interviews. She was always available for guidance whenever when we had a concern. She provided us with helpful information, useful contacts, and even served as an interpreter when necessary. Her help significantly contributed to the success of our report. Michael Parremore, a Vicdeaf employee, also made a noteworthy impact on our project. Mr. Parremore was an invaluable resource in the creation of the online version of our survey; he ii provided us with the Auslan videos of our questions, put the survey online, and created a link on the Vicdeaf website. He also helped to spread the word about our survey through Vicdeaf‟s newsletter. In addition, Mr. Parremore participated in an interview and provided us with helpful suggestions and potential contacts. We would also like to thank Sasha Hough for her help in the creation of the videos. We want to thank the follow organizations for their support of our survey; their cooperation was vital to the amount of response our online survey received: Australian Federation of Deaf Societies, Better Hearing Australia, Deaf Australia, Deaf Society of New South Wales, Deafness Forum of Australia, Deafness Foundation of Victoria, National Relay Service, Queensland Deaf Sports and Recreation, Victorian Council of Deaf People, and Western Australia Deaf Society Inc. In addition, there were numerous individuals from other organizations that provided us with helpful information for our report. We want to thank Geoff Cousins, the Captioning and Compliance Coordinator for ABC, Eliza Lamens, the Project Manager for Platypus, and Audrey Dropsy, the Senior Project Officer of Community Development of the Department of Human Services. We also want to thank the Victorian Government Department of Justice for their help, and, more specifically, Heather Lakin, the Stakeholder and Community Relations Coordinator, Anne Leadbeater, Manager for Community Engagement, Nathan Maddock, Online Communications Officer, and Melanie Mills, the Deputy Director for Communities and Media Relations. These individuals helped to better our understanding of Victoria‟s emergency warnings and the Department of Justice‟s role in the system. Furthermore, we would like to thank Julie Harris and Pat Pereira from the Metropolitan Fire Brigade for providing us with a tour and helpful information about both MFB and the current emergency response system. We would also like to thank Christine Elliot, Manager for Programs for Diverse Populations from the Country Fire Authority. She provided us with information about the CFA‟s programs as well as what they do to make their information and programs accessible for all groups. We would also like to thank Gavin Balharrie and Lidia Murone from Vicdeaf‟s Information Department for helping to better our understanding of Vicdeaf‟s work with the CFA as well as Vicdeaf‟s role in bushfire preparedness for the Deaf and hard of hearing community in Victoria. iii In addition, we want to thank Janet Richardson, Vice President for Student Affairs and Campus Life at WPI. She provided us with information about WPI‟s Emergency Alerting System which allowed us to have a better understanding of what the capabilities of an emergency warning system are in the United States. We would like to thank Louisa Willoughby for her feedback on our proposal as well as for sharing her expertise on Victoria‟s Fire Alarm Subsidy. We would also like to thank Marc Curtis for sharing his knowledge of the Video Relay Service that was recently implemented in Victoria. Both are Vicdeaf employees and their help was essential in our case studies. Also from Vicdeaf, we would like to thank Helen Kennedy and Lyn DeHoedt for the suggestions, support and encouragement they provided throughout our project. In addition, we want to thank all of the Vicdeaf interpreters for their help in communicating with the Deaf community; their assistance was critical for the success of all our interviews and meetings. Finally, we would like to thank Erin DeSilva and Laura Hanlan from WPI who provided us with the knowledge we needed to use SharePoint and Refworks in order to manage our information and documents as we worked on our project. These resources were critical tools in allowing us to write a thorough report. The assistance of all of these individuals and organizations was monumental in the success of our Interactive Qualifying Project. We want to sincerely thank all of them for the resources and guidance that they provided us with that allowed us to produce this finished report. iv AUTHORSHIP Section Author Reviewer Abstract SK ALL Acknowledgements KR SK Executive Summary TF KR 1. Introduction SK ALL 2. Background SK ALL 2.1 Disasters and warning systems SK ALL 2.2 The Deaf and hard of hearing KR, JM ALL 2.2.1 The needs of the hearing impaired KR ALL 2.3 Natural disasters and communication systems in Australia TF ALL 2.3.1 Bushfires TF ALL 2.3.2 National emergency system TF ALL 2.3.3 National emergency system for the Deaf TF ALL 2.3.4 New South Wales TF ALL 2.3.5 South Australia TF ALL 2.3.6 Victoria TF SK 2.3.7 Potential systems for the Deaf KR ALL 2.4 Current emergency systems around the world JM ALL 2.4.1 United Kingdom JM ALL 2.4.2 United States JM ALL 2.4.3 Canada JM ALL 2.4.4 South Africa TF ALL 2.4.5 Spain SK ALL 2.4.6 Greece KR ALL 2.4.7 Worldwide SK ALL 2.5 Vicdeaf SK ALL 3. Methodology TF ALL 3.1 Comparison of foreign countries‟ emergency communication JM ALL systems 3.2 The Deaf and hard of hearing community‟s level of TF ALL satisfaction with the current warning system 3.2.1 Survey JM ALL 3.2.2 Interviews JM ALL 3.3 Investigate potential challenges to implementation of changes SK ALL 3.3.1 Stakeholders other than the Deaf and hard of hearing SK ALL 3.3.2 Fire Alarm Subsidy case study KR SK 3.3.3 Video Relay Interpreting case study KR SK 3.3.4 United States emergency warning system case study JM JM 3.4 Propose changes to the current system JM TF 3.4.1 What changes should be implemented JM SK 3.4.2 Why the proposed changes should be implemented JM SK 4. Results and Analysis JM SK, TF v 4.1 Comparison of emergency communication systems in foreign JM SK countries 4.1.1 Disability rights and laws JM SK 4.1.2 Structure of emergency warning systems JM SK 4.1.3 Accessibility for the Deaf and hard of hearing JM SK 4.2 Deaf