DOCSLIB.ORG

A Global Trend in Belowground Carbon Allocation: Comment Knute J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Global Trend in Belowground Carbon Allocation: Comment Knute J Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology Publications 1998 A Global Trend in Belowground Carbon Allocation: Comment Knute J. Nadelhoffer Marine Biological Laboratory James W. Raich Iowa State University, [email protected] J.D. Aber University of New Hampshire Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/eeob_ag_pubs Part of the Climate Commons, Plant Biology Commons, and the Soil Science Commons The ompc lete bibliographic information for this item can be found at https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ eeob_ag_pubs/223. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ howtocite.html. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Global Trend in Belowground Carbon Allocation: Comment Abstract Gower et al. (1996) have questioned the validity of using a global-scale relationship between litterfall and belowground carbon (C) allocation (Raich and Nadelhoffer 1989) at stand and regional scales. We encourage attempts to understand better the controls on C allocation to roots in forests, including efforts to evaluate the potentials and limitations of C budgets for this purpose. However, the tests of our C-balance model that were presented by Gower et al. use inappropriate comparisons and the conclusions they drew are unwar ranted. In addition, they misinterpret and misapply our C-budgeting models and their conceptual bases. Therefore, we clarify our approach to estimating belowground C allocation (Raich and Nadelhoffer 1989, Nadelhoffer and Raich 1992) and highlight problems with the tests of our models as conducted by Gower et al. The issue in question is whether simplified soil C budgets can be used to estimate total root carbon allocation (TRCA, the annual rate at which assimilated C is allocated to producing and maintaining roots and mycorrhizae) in forest ecosystems. The oncc eptual model underlying the statistical model we used to predict TRCA at global scales (Raich and Nadelhoffer1989) is based on the First Law of Thermodynamics (i.e., conservation of mass) and can be expressed as TRCA = soil respiration - litterfall + export + ACroot - ACsoiI (1) where units are grams of C per square meter per year and where soil respiration is C02-C released from the soil surface due to respiration by live roots and het- erotrophs, litterfall is inputs to soil from aboveground production, export is C loss via erosion and leaching, ACroot is the change in root C (fine + oc arse), and AC0oil is the change in soil C (forest floor lusp mineral soil). The ts atistical model (same units) describes a simple linear regression that was derived from a collation of available data in which (export + ACroot - ACSOj) was assumed to be small relative to C fluxes in litterfall and soil respiration. The published statistical model is TRCA = 1.92 X litterfall + 130. (2) This relationship suggests that C allocation to roots (for tissue production plus respiration) in forests increases with litterfall at the global scale. Disciplines Climate | Plant Biology | Soil Science Comments This article is published as Copyright by the Ecological Society of America, Nadelhoffer, Knute J., James W. Raich, and J. D. Aber. "A global trend in belowground carbon allocation: comment." Ecology 79, no. 5 (1998): 1822-1825. 10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[1822:AGTIBC]2.0.CO;2. Posted with permission. This article is available at Iowa State University Digital Repository: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/eeob_ag_pubs/223 Wednesday Jun 03 10:00 AM ecol 79 701 Mp 1822 Allen Press x DTPro File # 01sc 1822 COMMENTS Ecology, Vol. 79, No. 5 Ecology, 79(5), 1998, pp. 1822±1825 q 1998 by the Ecological Society of America erotrophs, litterfall is inputs to soil from aboveground production, export is C loss via erosion and leaching, DCroot is the change in root C (®ne 1 coarse), and DCsoil is the change in soil C (forest ¯oor plus mineral soil). A GLOBAL TREND IN The statistical model (same units) describes a simple BELOWGROUND CARBON linear regression that was derived from a collation of available data in which (export 1DCroot 2DCsoil) was ALLOCATION: COMMENT assumed to be small relative to C ¯uxes in litterfall and soil respiration. The published statistical model is Knute J. Nadelhoffer,1 James W. Raich,2 and TRCA 5 1.92 3 litterfall 1 130. (2) J. D. Aber3 This relationship suggests that C allocation to roots Gower et al. (1996) have questioned the validity of (for tissue production plus respiration) in forests in- using a global-scale relationship between litterfall and creases with litterfall at the global scale. belowground carbon (C) allocation (Raich and Nadel- The statistical model (Eq. 2) is useful for estimating hoffer 1989) at stand and regional scales. We encourage C allocation to roots only when certain conditions are attempts to understand better the controls on C allo- met (see Raich and Nadelhoffer 1989). First, reliable cation to roots in forests, including efforts to evaluate measurements of annual litterfall and soil respiration the potentials and limitations of C budgets for this pur- rates are required. These are relatively easily made, but pose. However, the tests of our C-balance model that details of the methods used must be evaluated in order were presented by Gower et al. use inappropriate com- to assess the quality of model inputs. Second, the model parisons and the conclusions they drew are unwar- is applicable only in relatively mature forests with ``. ranted. In addition, they misinterpret and misapply our soils that are near steady state with respect to total C-budgeting models and their conceptual bases. There- organic carbon storage'' (Raich and Nadelhoffer 1989: fore, we clarify our approach to estimating below- 1347). In other words, the terms ``export,'' ``DCroot,'' ground C allocation (Raich and Nadelhoffer 1989, Na- and ``DCsoil'' (Eq. 1) must be small relative to the other delhoffer and Raich 1992) and highlight problems with two terms in the conceptual model. Importantly, the the tests of our models as conducted by Gower et al. model does not apply to young or to experimentally The issue in question is whether simpli®ed soil C manipulated (e.g., fertilized, recently thinned) stands budgets can be used to estimate total root carbon al- where C ¯uxes into and from soils can differ greatly location (TRCA, the annual rate at which assimilated and where changes in soil C pools can be large. We C is allocated to producing and maintaining roots and emphasize that soils should be near, but need not be mycorrhizae) in forest ecosystems. The conceptual at, steady state for application of the model. By stating model underlying the statistical model we used to pre- otherwise, Gower et al. have misrepresented our model. dict TRCA at global scales (Raich and Nadelhoffer Criticism by Gower et al. of the use of C budgets is 1989) is based on the First Law of Thermodynamics directed toward our published statistical relationship (i.e., conservation of mass) and can be expressed as (Eq. 2) and focuses on three points: (1) the lack of a positive correlation between measured and predicted TRCA ø soil respiration 2 litterfall 1 export belowground C allocation; (2) the lack of a positive 1DCroot2DC soil (1) relationship between estimated ®ne-root production and predicted belowground C allocation; and (3) the where units are grams of C per square meter per year potential misuse of our approach even if it is valid. and where soil respiration is CO -C released from the 2 Points (1) and (2) are legitimate attempts to invalidate soil surface due to respiration by live roots and het- the approach. Point (3) is misdirected in that the va- lidity of the approach is questioned based on its po- Manuscript received 9 June 1997; revised 20 December 1997; accepted 5 January 1998. tential for misuse. We respond below to each point. 1 The Ecosystems Center, Marine Biological Laboratory, Point 1.ÐThe comparison between measured and Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543 USA. predicted TRCA (Gower et al. 1996: Fig. 1) is not an 2 Department of Botany, 353 Bessey Hall, Iowa State Uni- appropriate test of our statistical model (Eq. 2) or of versity, Ames, Iowa, USA. 3 Complex Systems Research Center, University of New the overall C-budgeting approach because it is based Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824 USA. on inappropriate data. Of the stands used in their com- Wednesday Jun 03 10:00 AM ecol 79 701 Mp 1823 Allen Press x DTPro File # 01sc July 1998 COMMENTS 1823 parison, only 3 of 17 were .30 yr old and were neither marily on uncertainties associated with TRCA esti- fertilized, irrigated, nor thinned (Gower et al. 1996: mates and do not incorporate uncertainties in FRP es- Table 1). Assuming that soil C content is near steady timates into their discussion. Instead, they use the lack state in such stands is not realistic. Furthermore, meth- of a signi®cant correlation as an opportunity to spec- ods used to estimate litterfall and soil respiration in 8 ulate about possible factors that might cause patterns of their 17 stands are unpublished and therefore un- of aboveground and belowground C allocation by trees veri®able. Data from four additional stands were not to vary from stand to stand. The likely possibility that published as of November 1997 and data from two methodological problems might compromise existing others were published in a non-refereed and unavail- FRP estimates was omitted from their abstract in favor able symposium proceedings.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Impact of Fipronil Residues on Mole Cricket (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae) Behavior and Mortality in Bermudagrass
    Cummings et al.: Fipronil Impact on Mole Cricket Behavior and Mortality 293 IMPACT OF FIPRONIL RESIDUES ON MOLE CRICKET (ORTHOPTERA: GRYLLOTALPIDAE) BEHAVIOR AND MORTALITY IN BERMUDAGRASS HENNEN D. CUMMINGS1, RICK L. BRANDENBURG2, ROSS B. LEIDY3 AND FRED H. YELVERTON4 1Department of Agribusiness, Agronomy, Horticulture, and Range Management, Tarleton State University, Stephenville, TX 76402 2Department of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613 3Department of Molecular and Environmental Toxicology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7633 4Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620 ABSTRACT In a greenhouse experiment, fipronil was applied at 0.014 kg ai/ha to bermudagrass, Cyn- odon dactylon L., in plastic 5-liter containers 120, 90, 60, 30, and 0 days before adding one tawny mole cricket nymph, Scapteriscus vicinus Scudder to the container. After the exposure period, soil in the containers was divided into depth increments of 0-4, 4-8, and 8-18 cm, and cricket status was recorded as dead, absent, or alive by thoroughly examining soil. Soil in the 0-4 cm-increment was analyzed for fipronil and four fipronil metabolite residues. Fipronil residue concentrations decreased with time (C = 0.00002×2 – 0.0053× + 0.3675, R2 = 0.9998 where C = fipronil concentration (µg/g of soil) and x = days after treatment). Concen- trations of two metabolites, fipronil sulfone and fipronil sulfide, increased as fipronil resi- dues decreased. Each treatment’s affect on late instar mole crickets was significantly different from the non-treated; however, there were no significant differences in nymph sta- tus among fipronil-treated containers.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Tachinidae) Larvae
    Welch: Competition by Ormia depleta 497 INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION FOR RESOURCES BY ORMIA DEPLETA (DIPTERA: TACHINIDAE) LARVAE C. H. WELCH USDA/ARS/cmave, 1600 SW 23rd Drive, Gainesville, FL 32608 ABSTRACT Ormia depleta is a parasitoid of pest mole crickets in the southeastern United States. From 2 to 8 larvae of O. depleta were placed on each of 368 mole cricket hosts and allowed to de- velop. The weights of the host crickets, number of larvae placed, number of resulting pupae, and the weights of those pupae were all factored to determine optimal parasitoid density per host under laboratory rearing conditions. Based on larval survival and pupal weight, this study indicates that 4-5 larvae per host is optimal for laboratory rearing. Key Words: biocontrol, Scapteriscus, parasitoid, superparasitism RESUMEN Ormia depleta es un parasitoide de grillotopos en el sureste de los Estados Unidos. Entre 2 y 8 larvas de O. depleta se colocaron en 368 grillotopos huéspedes y se dejaron madurar. El peso de los huéspedes, el número de larvas de O. depleta colocadas, el número de pupas re- sultantes y el peso de las pupas fueron usados para determinar la densidad optima de para- sitoides en cada huésped para ser usadas en la reproducción de este parasitoide en el laboratorio. Nuestros resultados muestran que entre 4 y 5 larvas por cada grillotopo es la densidad optima para la reproducción en el laboratorio de este parasitoide. Translation provided by the author. Ormia depleta (Wiedemann) is a parasitoid of protocol requires hand inoculation of 3 planidia Scapteriscus spp. mole crickets, imported pests of under the posterior margin of the pronotum of turf and pasture grasses in the southeastern each host (R.
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding Habits of House and Feral Cats (Felis Catus) on Small Adriatic Islands (Croatia)
    NORTH-WESTERN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY 12 (2): 336-348 ©NwjZ, Oradea, Romania, 2016 Article No.: e151708 http://biozoojournals.ro/nwjz/index.html Feeding habits of house and feral cats (Felis catus) on small Adriatic islands (Croatia) József LANSZKI1*, Eduard KLETEČKI2, Balázs TRÓCSÁNYI3, Jasmina MUŽINIĆ4, Gabriella L. SZÉLES1 and Jenő J. PURGER5 1. Department of Nature Conservation, Kaposvár University, H–7400 Kaposvár, Hungary. 2. Croatian Natural History Museum, HR–10000 Zagreb, Croatia. 3. Duna-Drava National Park Directorate, H–7625 Pécs, Hungary. 4. Institute for Ornithology CASA, HR–10000 Zagreb, Croatia. 5. Institute of Biology, University of Pécs, H–7624 Pécs, Hungary. *Corresponding author, J. Lanszki, e-mail: [email protected] Received: 17. March 2015 / Accepted: 18. July 2015 / Available online: 28. July 2015 / Printed: December 2016 Abstract. The domestic cat (Felis catus), a globally recognised invasive predator, was introduced to the Adriatic islands (Croatia), but its feeding ecology and impacts on biodiversity in this region is unknown. We studied the feeding habits of house cats living in villages and feral cats on the outskirts of villages on two small islands (Olib and Silba) by analysing faecal samples collected in the spring and autumn periods. Our hypothesis was that the feeding strategies of cats as top mammalian predators vary in different environments, due to significant dissimilarities in their food resources. We surveyed the abundance of cats and their primary food types, e.g. small mammals, birds, rabbits Oryctolagus cuniculus, and lizards. Our results suggest that house cats fed most often on birds and common household food, while feral cats ate mostly small mammals and lizards.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects & Spiders of Kanha Tiger Reserve
    Some Insects & Spiders of Kanha Tiger Reserve Some by Aniruddha Dhamorikar Insects & Spiders of Kanha Tiger Reserve Aniruddha Dhamorikar 1 2 Study of some Insect orders (Insecta) and Spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) of Kanha Tiger Reserve by The Corbett Foundation Project investigator Aniruddha Dhamorikar Expert advisors Kedar Gore Dr Amol Patwardhan Dr Ashish Tiple Declaration This report is submitted in the fulfillment of the project initiated by The Corbett Foundation under the permission received from the PCCF (Wildlife), Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal, communication code क्रम 車क/ तकनीकी-I / 386 dated January 20, 2014. Kanha Office Admin office Village Baherakhar, P.O. Nikkum 81-88, Atlanta, 8th Floor, 209, Dist Balaghat, Nariman Point, Mumbai, Madhya Pradesh 481116 Maharashtra 400021 Tel.: +91 7636290300 Tel.: +91 22 614666400 [email protected] www.corbettfoundation.org 3 Some Insects and Spiders of Kanha Tiger Reserve by Aniruddha Dhamorikar © The Corbett Foundation. 2015. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used, reproduced, or transmitted in any form (electronic and in print) for commercial purposes. This book is meant for educational purposes only, and can be reproduced or transmitted electronically or in print with due credit to the author and the publisher. All images are © Aniruddha Dhamorikar unless otherwise mentioned. Image credits (used under Creative Commons): Amol Patwardhan: Mottled emigrant (plate 1.l) Dinesh Valke: Whirligig beetle (plate 10.h) Jeffrey W. Lotz: Kerria lacca (plate 14.o) Piotr Naskrecki, Bud bug (plate 17.e) Beatriz Moisset: Sweat bee (plate 26.h) Lindsay Condon: Mole cricket (plate 28.l) Ashish Tiple: Common hooktail (plate 29.d) Ashish Tiple: Common clubtail (plate 29.e) Aleksandr: Lacewing larva (plate 34.c) Jeff Holman: Flea (plate 35.j) Kosta Mumcuoglu: Louse (plate 35.m) Erturac: Flea (plate 35.n) Cover: Amyciaea forticeps preying on Oecophylla smargdina, with a kleptoparasitic Phorid fly sharing in the meal.
    [Show full text]
  • Mole Crickets Scapteriscus Spp
    Mole Crickets Scapteriscus spp. Southern mole cricket, Scapteriscus borellii Tawny mole cricket, Scapteriscus vicinus DESCRIPTION OF INSECT All stages live in the soil and are rarely see on the surface. Immature stage Nymphs of both species are similar in appearance to adults, but lack wings. Nymphs proceed through 8-10 instars ranging in size from 0.2 to 1.25 inches in length. Each instar is progressively larger with wing buds apparent on later instars. Color varies from gray to brown. Pronotum (large shield behind head) with distinctive mottling or spots, depending on species and location. Mature stage Adults are somewhat cylindrically shaped, light colored crickets 1.26 to 1.38 inches in length. Adults have two pairs of wings, but only fly at night during two brief flight periods in fall and early spring. Spring flights are generally more extensive than fall flights. Damaging stage(s) Both nymphs and adults cause damage Predictive models (degree day, plant phenology, threat temperatures, other) Eggs being to hatch at threat temperatures of 65° F and higher (spring/early summer in most locations). Egg-laying and hatch timing are affected by soil moisture. Threat temperatures can be used to trigger preventive treatments. See the article, “Threat temperatures” for more information. Preventive treatments should be applied prior to egg-hatch (early June) or at the time of peak hatch (last week of June, first week of July in most years and locations). Weekly soap flushes in June and early July is the best method to determine when hatch is occurring, and the best time to treat.
    [Show full text]
  • Tawny Mole Cricket
    INSECT PESTS Tawny Mole Cricket Prepared by Camille Goodwin, MG 2008 Texas AgriLife Extension Service Galveston County Office Dickinson, TX 77539 Educational programs of the Texas AgriLife Extension Service are open to all people without regard to race, color, sex, disability, religion, age, or national origin. The Texas A&M System, U.S. Department of Agriculture and the County Commissioners Courts of Texas cooperating. FIG. 1 Type Pest: chewing insect (Scapteriscus vicinus Scudder) • Another closely related mole cricket, the southern mole cricket (Scapteriscus borellia Giglio-Tos) also occurs in the Galveston-Houston area Type Metamorphous: simple (egg, nymph and adult stages) Period of Primary Activity: April through October Plants Affected • Bermudagrass and bahiagrass are the primary turfgrasses damaged by the mole cricket, although extensive damage can be sustained on cultivars of St. Augustinegrass, FIG. 2 centipedegrass, ryegrass, zoysiagrass and bentgrass • Tomato, strawberry, beet, cabbage, cantaloupe, carrot, cauliflower, collard, eggplant, kale, lettuce, onion, pepper, potato, spinach, sweet potato, turnip, flowers such as coleus, chrysanthemum, gypsophila, and other plants • Mole crickets feed on other soil-dwelling insects Identifying Characteristics of Insect Pest EGG STAGE • After mating and dispersal flights occur, females lay eggs in cells dug in the soil primarly during April with some egg laying occurring into early summer • Eggs hatch in about 2 weeks FIG. 3 NYMPH STAGES • Nymphs develop through eight juvenile stages (separated by molts) mostly during the summer months. • Each successive growth stage (instar) is larger and looks more and more like the adult but lack fully developed wings • Winter is spent as partially grown nymphs and as adults ADULT STAGE (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Mole Cricket: Scapteriscus Vicinus Shortwinged Mole Cricket: Scapteriscus Abbreviatus
    Tawny Mole Cricket: Scapteriscus vicinus Shortwinged Mole Cricket: Scapteriscus abbreviatus Biology & Lifecycle: Adults and larger nymphs chew on stems of seedlings and smaller plants at the soil surface. The tawny mole cricket has one generation each year and overwinters as adults, which lay eggs in April through early June. Nymphs grow slowly through the summer months and start becoming adults in September. The shortwinged mole cricket is almost restricted to coastal areas. Most eggs are laid in late spring through early summer. Females of both species lay clutches of eggs in underground egg chambers. Environmental Factors: Tawny and shortwinged mole crickets are present year-around, with adults and large nymphs overwintering but inactivated by cold temperatures and drought (they burrow deeper underground). Irrigation during drought allows them to be active. Flooding forces them to migrate to higher ground. Adult: Adults are large, about 1¼ inches, with wings longer than body (tawny mole cricket (Figure 3)) or very much shorter than body (shortwinged mole cricket (Figure 1)). Both adults and nymphs have enlarged and toothed forelegs for digging; expanded femurs (base of the hind legs) for jumping, although only nymphs jump. All species have soft bodies, with the middle body section protected by a hardened cover (pronotum). Immature: Nymphs range from less than 1/8 inch at hatching to about 1 inch several months later, resembling the adults but without trace of wings in the first 4 instars and with small wing buds in later instars. The number of molts varies from 6 to 9 (Figure 5). Host range: Both species attack seedlings of eggplant, sweet pepper, tobacco, tomato and cabbage.
    [Show full text]
  • Provisioning Patterns and Choice of Prey in the Digger Wasp Cerceris Arenaria (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae): the Role of Prey Size
    NOTE Eur. J. Entomol. 102: 801–804, 2005 ISSN 1210-5759 Provisioning patterns and choice of prey in the digger wasp Cerceris arenaria (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae): the role of prey size CARLO POLIDORI, ROBERTO BOESI, FRANCESCO ISOLA and FRANCESCO ANDRIETTI Dipartimento di Biologia, Sezione di Zoologia e Citologia, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 26, 20133 Milano, Italy; e-mail: cpolidori @virgilio.it Key words. Cerceris arenaria, Hymenoptera, Crabronidae, behaviour, nest provisioning, prey, Curculionidae, hunting specialization Abstract. At a nest site in Northern Italy of females of the weevil-hunting digger wasp Cerceris arenaria L. (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae) the provisioning activity and predator-prey relationship were investigated, in particular their specialization in choice of prey. Females were active from middle of June to end of July, and from 8.00 to 19.00. The wasps made provisioning flights throughout the day, mostly in late morning and early afternoon. Individual wasps generally only hunted for 1 or 2 prey species of all those available, maybe because of their higher abundance. The size of prey, which is positively correlated with that of the female wasps, seems to be the main factor determining choice of prey. The nature of the provisioning flights seems to be related to the size of the prey, being more frequent and shorter for smaller weevils. The correlation between prey and wasp biomass is discussed in relation to the size range of the wasps. INTRODUCTION “small” (about 0.7–1.2 mm), “medium” (1.3–1.9 mm) or “large” prey (2.0–2.7 mm). The accurately measured wasps and prey Recent studies on sphecoid wasps have focused on predator- came from an area close to the aggregation of nests.
    [Show full text]
  • Howard Frank Professor Emeritus
    J. Howard Frank Professor Emeritus Contact: PO Box 110620 Building 970, Natural Area Dr. Gainesville, FL 32611 (352) 273-3922 [email protected] Education B.Sc. (Honors), Durham University, England (Zoology), 1963 D.Phil., Oxford University, England (Entomology), 1967 Relevant Employment History Professor (1987-2012) Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida Associate Professor (1985-1987) Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida Associate Professor (1983-1985) Florida Medical Entomology Lab, Vero Beach, FL Entomologist (1972-1983) Entomological Research Center (later Florida Medical Entomology Lab), Vero Beach, FL Entomologist (1968-1972) Research Department, Sugar Manufacturers' Association, Mandeville, Jamaica Post-doctoral Fellow (1966-1968) Entomology Department, University of Alberta, Canada Former Research Responsibilities Biological control of pest insects using parasitoids, predators, or pathogens. Current projects are against Scapteriscus mole crickets (pests of turf, pasture grasses, and vegetables), and Metamasius callizona (pest of bromeliads). Former Teaching responsibilities Biological Control (ENY 5241), a course for graduate students. Tropical Entomology for undergraduates (ENY 3563/ENY 3564L) and for graduates (ENY 5566/ENY 5567L). Supervision of research by graduate students. Former Extension responsibilities Extension of results of the research project Accomplishments Introduction, colonization, release, and establishment in at least 38 Florida counties of Ormia depleta (Diptera: Tachinidae)
    [Show full text]
  • Mole Crickets (Gryllotalpidae)
    Information Sheet Mole Crickets (Gryllotalpidae) An adult mole cricket, Gryllotalpa sp. (australis­group) with fully developed wings: the fore wings extend only about half the length of the abdomen and partially conceal the folded hind wings which extend down the midline beyond the end of the abdomen. Mole crickets have become one of the most as a distinct family, Gryllotalpidae (e.g. commonly asked­about insects at the WA Rentz 1996). They are distinguished from Museum. This is a result of the establishment true crickets in being modified for a and spread of two species not known to occur burrowing mode of life: the fore legs bear in Western Australia prior to the 1990’s. They stout spines to assist digging and the first are Gryllotalpa sp. (australis­group) and G. segment of the thorax is enlarged and pluvialis. The latter, at least, is native to hardened. Females lack the needle­like eastern Australia. They have spread ovipositor of the true crickets. throughout Perth’s suburbs and are known also from other south­western population Mole crickets are often confused with the centres. According to enquirers, the insects superficially similar sandgropers or run rampant in vegetable gardens, plant pots cylindrachetids (see separate information or new lawns, drown in swimming pools, enter sheet). They are readily distinguished by houses and cause annoyance by their loud their longer appendages and (usually) the songs. presence of wings in adults. Fully winged individuals are capable of flight but they fly Mole crickets are most closely related to the only at night and are sometimes attracted to true crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) and lights.
    [Show full text]
  • Caribbean Food Crops Society Serving the Caribbean Since 1963 Caribbean Food Crops Society 40
    CARIBBEAN FOOD CROPS SOCIETY SERVING THE CARIBBEAN SINCE 1963 CARIBBEAN FOOD CROPS SOCIETY 40 Fortieth Annual Meeting 2004 Proceedings of the Caribbean Food Crops Society. 40:249-183. 2004 A COMMERCI AL NEMATODE FOR MOLE CRICKET CONTROL N.C. Leppla1, J.H. Frank', N. Vicente2 and A. Pantoja3. 1 University of Florida, IF AS, P.O. Box 110620, Gainesville, FL 32611-0620, 2University of Puerto Rico, Agricultural Experiment Station, P.O. Box 9030, Mayaguez, PR 00681-9030, United States Department of Agriculture, ARS, SARU, Fairbanks, AK99775-7200 ABSTRACT: In Puerto Rico, the name "changa" is generally applied to Scapteriscus didactylus (Latreille) (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae), the most widespread and damaging of the non- indigenous pest mole crickets in Puerto Rico. S. abbreviatus Scudder is also established but much less abundant. We conducted a T-STAR project to efficiently release, establish, distribute and evaluate the entomopathogenic nematode, Stinernema scapterisci Nguyen and Smart (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae), for controlling Scapteriscus spp. mole crickets. The University of Florida negotiated an agreement with Becker Underwood for commercial production of the nematode that is available as the product, Nematac®S. The "mole cricket nematode" has been used effectively to control non-indigenous mole crickets in pastures and turf in Florida since the early 1990s. It parasitizes only Scapteriscus spp. in nature and not indigenous mole crickets that are in a different genus, so it is safe to import and release. The level of mole cricket infection, nematode establishment and dispersal, and suppression of mole cricket populations is being quantified. This project provided data on the occurrence and life history of Scapteriscus spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Mounds of Fury Chrissie A
    SCS-2020-03 MOUNDS OF FURY CHRISSIE A. SEGARS, PH.D, EXTENSION TURFGRASS SPECIALIST MICHAEL MERCHANT, PH.D, EXTENSION URBAN ENTOMOLOGIST WHAT IS THAT MOUND??? MOUNDING OR Each year, we do our best to manage our lawns and BURROWING landscapes. But each year, unexpected pests pop out ANIMALS COMMONLY of nowhere! It never fails! This factsheet seeks to explain critters that cause mounds in your yard—how FOUND IN TURFGRASS to identify them and whether or not you should be SYSTEMS worried. This is intended as a basic guide for mound Ants identification. For more information please visit Crawfish aggieturf.tamu.edu and insects.tamu.edu. Earthworms Gophers & Moles ANTS Red Imported Fire Ant June Beetles In Texas, the principal ant pest is the red imported fire Ground-Nesting Bees ant. While fire ants do not damage lawns directly, mounds Ground-Nesting Wasps are unattractive and may hinder cultural practices such as Mole Crickets mowing. Even worse, fire ants have painful stings that can make infested areas unusable to people and pets. Fire ant mounds consist of piles of loose soil with no obvious entry or exit. Inside, ants live in complex galleries that extend 1 to 3 feet below the surface. When treating fire ants, it’s best not to disturb them ahead of time, as this may cause the worker ants to relocate and avoid the insecticide treatment. A fire ant bed next to a sidewalk. Photo Cred: Bart Drees Texas Leaf Cutting Ants This ant has several common names— “town ant”, “cut ant”, etc. This ant has the potential to be very destructive to landscapes, gardens, and even some agricultural crops.
    [Show full text]