Belgian Journal ofEntomology 4 (2002) : 53-95 Preliminary phylogenetic analysis of the subfamilies of Crambidae (Pyraloidea Lepidoptera) by M. Alma Sous1 & K. V. N. MAEs2 1 Systematic Entomology Laboratory, ARS, USDA, c/o National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C, U.S.A. (e-mail:
[email protected]). 2 AgroBioSys Intl., Kleine Smetledestraat 192, B-9230 Wetteren, Belgium. Present address: National Museums of Kenya, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, P.O. Box 40658,00100 Nairobi, Kenya (e-mail:
[email protected]). Correspondence: M. Alma Sous, Systematic Entomology Laboratory, PSI, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, c/o National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560-0168, U.S.A. Abstract The phylogenetic relationships among 17 subfamilies of Crambidae are investigated using adult characters and parsimony. The morphological evidence on subfamilies of Crambidae is reviewed, and the validity of morphological characters traditionally used to define taxa and determine relationships are reviewed and discussed. Three new genital characters are utilized in the analysis. The results indicate monophyly of one group of subfamilies, herein called the pyraustine group. The spilomeline group of subfamilies is basal and paraphyletic to the better-supported pyraustine group. Spilomelinae and Pyraustinae, two subfamilies historically believed to be closely related, are widely separated. Evidence suggests Pyraustinae, Odontiinae, Evergestinae, and Glaphyriinae are paraphyletic with respect to each other, and upon further study at lower taxonomic levels should be redefined as one subfamily. Results do not support a close relationship between Dichogaminae and Glaphyriinae. Keywords: adult morphology, Pyraloidea, Pyralidae, Spilomelinae, Pyraustinae. Introduction The Pyraloidea, with over 16,000 described species and at least as many undescribed species, is one of the largest superfamilies of Lepidoptera.