DOCSLIB.ORG

Proposed Protocols for Inventories of Rare Plants of the Grassland Natural Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proposed Protocols for Inventories of Rare Plants of the Grassland Natural Region Proposed Protocols for Inventories of Rare Plants of the Grassland Natural Region Alberta Species at Risk Report No. 21 Proposed Protocols for Inventories of Rare Plants of the Grassland Natural Region Cliff Wallis Alberta Species at Risk Report No. 21 June 2001 Publication No. I/027 ISBN: 0-7785-1813-2 (Printed Edition) ISBN: 0-7785-7808-6 (Online Edition) ISSN: 1496-7219 (Printed Edition) ISSN: 1496-7146 (Online Edition) For copies of this report, contact: Information Centre – Publications Alberta Environment Natural Resources Service Main Floor, Great West Life Building 9920 – 108 Street Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5K 2M4 Telephone: (780) 422-2079 OR Information Service Alberta Environment #100, 3115 – 12 Street NE Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2E 7J2 Telephone: (403) 297-3362 OR Visit our web site at: http://www.gov.ab.ca/env/fw/status/reports/index.html This publication may be cited as: Wallis, Cliff. 2001. Proposed protocols for inventories of rare plants of the Grassland Natural Region. Alberta Sustainable Resource Development, Fish and Wildlife Service, Alberta Species at Risk Report No. 21. Edmonton, AB. 305 pp. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... 1 2. METHODS ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Prioritizing and Ranking Vascular Plant Species................................................................................ 1 2.2.1 Defining Priority List of Taxa for Status Reports .......................................................................... 1 2.2.2 Ranking Species on the Priority List............................................................................................. 2 2.2.3 Implementation Considerations.................................................................................................... 3 2.2.4 Key Steps in Preparing a Status Report for Vascular Plant Taxa................................................ 4 3. PROTOCOLS FOR PRIORITY SPECIES 2001-2003............................................................................. 5 3.1 Evaluation Results -- Priorities for Status Reports ............................................................................. 6 3.1.1 Northern Fescue Grassland Natural Subregion ........................................................................... 6 3.1.2 Foothills Fescue Grassland Natural Subregion............................................................................ 8 3.1.3 Mixed Grassland Natural Subregion .......................................................................................... 10 3.1.4 Dry Mixed Grassland Natural Subregion....................................................................................13 4. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROTOCOLS IN YEAR 2001-2005 .............................. 17 5. COST ESTIMATES................................................................................................................................ 17 6. LITERATURE CITED ............................................................................................................................. 17 7. PROTOCOLS AND ELEMENT OCCURRENCES................................................................................. 18 Allium geyeri Geyer's onion .................................................................................................................... 18 Amaranthus californicus Californian amaranth ....................................................................................... 22 Ambrosia acanthicarpa bur ragweed ...................................................................................................... 23 Anagallis minima (Centunculus minimus) chaffweed ............................................................................. 26 Arabidopsis salsuginea mouse-ear cress ............................................................................................... 29 Aristida purpurea var longiseta red three-awn ........................................................................................ 30 Asclepias viridiflora green milkweed ....................................................................................................... 32 Aster campestris meadow aster ............................................................................................................. 33 Aster pauciflorus few-flowered aster ....................................................................................................... 35 Astragalus kentrophyta var kentrophyta prickly milk vetch...................................................................... 42 Astragalus lotiflorus low milk vetch ......................................................................................................... 44 Astragalus purshii Pursh's milk vetch ..................................................................................................... 48 Atriplex canescens saltbush ................................................................................................................... 53 Atriplex powellii Powell’s saltbush .......................................................................................................... 55 Atriplex truncata saltbush ........................................................................................................................ 57 Bacopa rotundifolia water hyssop ........................................................................................................... 58 Bidens frondosa common beggarticks .................................................................................................... 59 Boisduvalia glabella smooth boisduvalia ................................................................................................ 62 Bromus latiglumis Canada brome ........................................................................................................... 65 Calylophus serrulatus shrubby evening-primrose .................................................................................. 66 Camissonia andina upland evening-primrose ........................................................................................ 69 Camissonia breviflora taraxia ................................................................................................................. 70 Carex hystericina porcupine sedge ........................................................................................................ 71 Carex nebrascensis Nebraska sedge ..................................................................................................... 73 Carex retrorsa turned sedge ...................................................................................................................80 Carex parryana var parryana Parry's sedge ........................................................................................... 84 Castilleja cusickii yellow paintbrush ........................................................................................................ 88 Castilleja lutescens stiff yellow paintbrush .............................................................................................. 94 Castilleja sessiliflora downy paintbrush .................................................................................................. 99 Cerastium brachypodum ....................................................................................................................... 100 Chenopodium desiccatum goosefoot ................................................................................................... 101 Chenopodium incanum goosefoot ........................................................................................................ 103 Chenopodium subglabrum smooth narrow-leaved goosefoot .............................................................. 104 Chenopodium watsonii Watson's goosefoot ......................................................................................... 105 Coreopsis tinctoria common tickseed ................................................................................................... 106 Crepis occidentalis small-flowered hawk's-beard ................................................................................. 109 Cryptantha minima small cryptanthe .................................................................................................... 113 Cuscuta gronovii common dodder ........................................................................................................ 115 Cyperus schweinitzii sand nut-grass .................................................................................................... 116 Cyperus squarrosus awned nut-grass .................................................................................................. 118 Downingia laeta downingia .................................................................................................................... 119 Draba reptans whitlow-grass ................................................................................................................ 121 Elatine triandra waterwort ..................................................................................................................... 123 Eleocharis engelmannii Engelmann's spike-rush = E. ovata................................................................. 124 Ellisia
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Milk River – Sage Creek: Coming to Terms on a Grassland Wilderness by Cliff Wallis
    ALBERTA WILDERNESS ARTICLE ASSOCIATION Wild Lands Advocate 9(5): 5-7, October 2001 Milk River – Sage Creek: Coming to Terms on a Grassland Wilderness By Cliff Wallis This is the story of how the AWA became a founding member of the Milk River Management Society in which it is still an active member today. Situated between the Cypress Hills and the Canada-U.S. boundary, Milk River-Sage Creek is one of the least fragmented, most extensive and most diverse prairie upland, wetland and valley landscapes on the glaciated plains of North America. This 5000 sq. km area is hard to describe in anything less than superlatives. Its size, unique geology and diverse ecosystems make it a national treasure. The Great Plains has been profoundly altered by human activities. In just over 100 years, more than 70% of Canada's grasslands have been destroyed by cultivation. Direct loss and fragmentation has changed species' distributions and numbers while transforming entire landscapes and natural ecological processes. It is one of the most endangered natural regions in North America. Despite this, less than 1% of Alberta's remaining grasslands are "protected". This has contributed to the high numbers of species at risk. Of Alberta's vertebrates at risk, over half occur at Milk River-Sage Creek. The area abounds in unique and rare phenomena, but it is the variety in both the rare and the common features that gives Milk River-Sage Creek its tremendous value. Resting atop a badland butte and gazing across the Milk River canyon and rolling grasslands to the forested Sweetgrass Hills, one can contemplate the natural majesty of the Great Plains.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • 45Th Anniversary Year
    VOLUME 45, NO. 1 Spring 2021 Journal of the Douglasia WASHINGTON NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY th To promote the appreciation and 45 conservation of Washington’s native plants Anniversary and their habitats through study, education, Year and advocacy. Spring 2021 • DOUGLASIA Douglasia VOLUME 45, NO. 1 SPRING 2021 journal of the washington native plant society WNPS Arthur R. Kruckberg Fellows* Clay Antieau Lou Messmer** President’s Message: William Barker** Joe Miller** Nelsa Buckingham** Margaret Miller** The View from Here Pamela Camp Mae Morey** Tom Corrigan** Brian O. Mulligan** by Keyna Bugner Melinda Denton** Ruth Peck Ownbey** Lee Ellis Sarah Reichard** Dear WNPS Members, Betty Jo Fitzgerald** Jim Riley** Mary Fries** Gary Smith For those that don’t Amy Jean Gilmartin** Ron Taylor** know me I would like Al Hanners** Richard Tinsley Lynn Hendrix** Ann Weinmann to introduce myself. I Karen Hinman** Fred Weinmann grew up in a small town Marie Hitchman * The WNPS Arthur R. Kruckeberg Fellow Catherine Hovanic in eastern Kansas where is the highest honor given to a member most of my time was Art Kermoade** by our society. This title is given to Don Knoke** those who have made outstanding spent outside explor- Terri Knoke** contributions to the understanding and/ ing tall grass prairie and Arthur R. Kruckeberg** or preservation of Washington’s flora, or woodlands. While I Mike Marsh to the success of WNPS. Joy Mastrogiuseppe ** Deceased love the Midwest, I was ready to venture west Douglasia Staff WNPS Staff for college. I earned Business Manager a Bachelor of Science Acting Editor Walter Fertig Denise Mahnke degree in Wildlife Biol- [email protected] 206-527-3319 [email protected] ogy from Colorado State Layout Editor University, where I really Mark Turner Office and Volunteer Coordinator [email protected] Elizabeth Gage got interested in native [email protected] plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Legumes of the North-Central States: C
    LEGUMES OF THE NORTH-CENTRAL STATES: C-ALEGEAE by Stanley Larson Welsh A Dissertation Submitted, to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Subject: Systematic Botany Approved: Signature was redacted for privacy. Signature was redacted for privacy. artment Signature was redacted for privacy. Dean of Graduat College Iowa State University Of Science and Technology Ames, Iowa I960 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii INTRODUCTION 1 HISTORICAL ACCOUNT 3 MATERIALS AND METHODS 8 TAXONOMIC AND NOMENCLATURE TREATMENT 13 REFERENCES 158 APPENDIX A 176 APPENDIX B 202 iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer wishes to express his deep gratitude to Professor Duane Isely for assistance in the selection of the problem and for the con­ structive criticisms and words of encouragement offered throughout the course of this investigation. Support through the Iowa Agricultural Experiment Station and through the Industrial Science Research Institute made possible the field work required in this problem. Thanks are due to the curators of the many herbaria consulted during this investigation. Special thanks are due the curators of the Missouri Botanical Garden, U. S. National Museum, University of Minnesota, North Dakota Agricultural College, University of South Dakota, University of Nebraska, and University of Michigan. The cooperation of the librarians at Iowa State University is deeply appreciated. Special thanks are due Dr. G. B. Van Schaack of the Missouri Botanical Garden library. His enthusiastic assistance in finding rare botanical volumes has proved invaluable in the preparation of this paper. To the writer's wife, Stella, deepest appreciation is expressed. Her untiring devotion, work, and cooperation have made this work possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth and Reproduction in an Alpine Cushion Plant: Astragalus Kentrophyta Var
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 55 Number 2 Article 3 4-21-1995 Growth and reproduction in an alpine cushion plant: Astragalus kentrophyta var. implexus Wayne R. Owen University of California, Davis and White Mountain Research Station, University of California, Las Angeles Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Owen, Wayne R. (1995) "Growth and reproduction in an alpine cushion plant: Astragalus kentrophyta var. implexus," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 55 : No. 2 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol55/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Great Basin Naturalist 55(2), © 1995, pp. 117-123 GROWTH AND REPRODUCTION IN AN ALPINE CUSHION PLANT: ASTRAGALUS KENTROPHYTA VAR. IMPLEXUS Wayne R. Owen1 ABSTRACf.-A two-year field experiment was conducted to investigate factors hypothesized to affect the reproduc­ tive potential ofAstragalus kentrophyta var. implexus and to test the importance oftrade-offs between growth and repro­ duction in this species. Levels of mineral nutrients, water, herbivory, and competition were manipulated. Seed output R."1d growth of individuals in treatment groups were compared against control plants. Neither water nor mineral nutri­ ents alone were shown to affect growth or reproduction. Herbivory was shown to be similarly unimportant in affecting growth and reproduction. Competition with other species influenced growth but not reproduction. No significant trade­ offs between growth and reproduction were detected within years.
    [Show full text]
  • Identity of Mertensia Oblongifolia (Nutt.) G. Don (Boraginaceae) and Its Allies in Western North America
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 58 Number 1 Article 4 1-30-1998 Identity of Mertensia oblongifolia (Nutt.) G. Don (Boraginaceae) and its allies in western North America Ahmed M. Warfa Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Warfa, Ahmed M. (1998) "Identity of Mertensia oblongifolia (Nutt.) G. Don (Boraginaceae) and its allies in western North America," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 58 : No. 1 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol58/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Great Basin Naturalist 58(1), © 1998, pp. 38-44 IDENTITY OF MERTENSIA OBLONGIFOLIA (NUTT) G. DON (BORAGINACEAE) AND ITS ALLIES IN WESTERN NORTH AMERICA Ahmed M. Warfal ABSTRACT.-The current status of Mertensia oblongifoUa (Nutt.) G. Don and its allied taxa is surveyed. On the bases of continuously coherent morphological characters and/or regionally correlated variations, more than 30 taxa, including species, subspecies, varieties, and 1 forma, previously considered different from M. oblongifolia, are now placed under synonymy of this species. Those taxa currently known as M. fusiformis Greene, M. bakeri Greene, and M. bakeri var. osterhoutii Williams are among the new synonyms. Typification, taxonomy, and morphological problems ofM. oblongifo­ lia are discussed. Key words: Mertensia oblongifolia, typification, Wxorwmy, morphology, allied taxa. Nuttall (1834) described and depicted Pul­ represents an important additional morpholog­ monaria oblongifolia from a collection ofplants ical feature in the taxon.
    [Show full text]
  • Taseko Prosperity Gold-Copper Project
    Taseko Prosperity Gold-Copper Project Appendix 5-5-C BASELINE RARE PLANT SURVEY REPORT FOR THE TASEKO MINES LTD. PROSPERITY PROJECT SITE A summary of the results of rare plant surveys completed by Mike Ryan and Terry McIntosh on behalf of Madrone Consultants in 1997 June 3, 2006 Terry McIntosh Ph.D. AXYS Environmental Consulting Ltd. Biospherics Environmental Inc. 2045 Mills Rd. 3-1175 E. 14th Ave. Sidney, BC Vancouver, BC V8L 3S8 V5T 2P2 Attn.: Scott Trusler M.Sc., R.P.Bio. 1.0 INTRODUCTION This document summarizes the objectives, methods, and results of a rare plant inventory undertaken in 1997 at the Prosperity Mine Site near Taseko Lake in the western Cariboo Region (Madrone 1999). This inventory was completed in order to satisfy part of the requirements of a broad-based environmental assessment in preparation for the development of a mine in the area. AXYS Environmental Consulting Ltd. has requested this summary for use a baseline for incremental rare plant surveys that will be completed in 2006. The proposed work will both update and expand upon the previous inventory. Accordingly, AXYS has also requested recommendations for the proposed plant inventory. 2.0 SUMMARY OF 1997 RARE PLANT PROJECT 2.1 Objectives The main objectives of the rare plant inventory were to survey the proposed Prosperity Mine footprint to determine whether provincially rare species of plants, as determined by the British Columbia Conservation Data Center (CDC), were present in the area, and, if found, to identify any potential impacts to these elements and to develop mitigation accordingly. The search effort focused on vascular plant species, bryophytes (mosses and liverworts), and lichens.
    [Show full text]
  • August 2015.Pub
    “Environment is but our looking glass.” James Allen August 2015 Lethbridge Waste Diversion Policy SAGE Meetings—no The City of Lethbridge approved Council members were also tion followed by the introduc- meeting in August. a Waste Diversion Policy on briefed on potential five-, sev- tion of surcharges on tipping June 20th which sets a five-year en- and 10 year implementa- fees for targeted materials at Riparian Restoration Work- target of a 30-per-cent overall tion schedules for a diversion the landfill and, in the final shops. August 21st, 28th per-capita waste disposal reduc- strategy for waste from the phase, regulations which could and 29th in Turner Valley. tion by 2021 and a 15-year tar- local ICI/C&D sectors, which include mandatory recycling Registration $50 at Sustain- get of 50 per cent by 2030. together comprise about 75 per and/or disposal bans.” ability Resources. cent of the waste that enters the From the City of Lethbridge: landfill each year. Each pro- The Industrial, Commercial Lethbridge Sustainable Liv- “Existing residential recycling posed implementation schedule and Institutional Recycling ing Association is planning programs divert about 20 per would include a three-phase Implementation Strategy de- AppleFest for August 29th. cent of residential waste from approach, starting with educa- scribes the plan which includes See their website for details the landfill. The draft policy focused stakeholder engage- and apple-picking opportu- proposes to increase residential ment and the development of nities: waste diversion to 50 per cent by best practices to help Leth- www.lethbridgesustainableli 2021 and 65 per cent by 2030.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Jay, Vol.55, Issue 3
    THE EVENING-PRIMROSES OF SASKATCHEWAN DIANA BIZECKI ROBSON, 811 Avenue E North, Saskatoon, SK S7L 1S7 Introduction total. The common name tends to cause some confusion. One would This article describes some of the think that the evening-primroses are general characteristics of the Evening- primroses which bloom in the eve¬ primroses (genus Oenothera) and ning.11 In fact, they are unrelated to presents a taxonomic treatment of the primroses (Primula species), and the genus consisting of a dichoto¬ while some species do bloom in the mous key, descriptions and habitat early evening, others bloom in the information. morning.11 Those species which flower in the evening are pollinated The common name evening- by nocturnal insects like moths.6 In primrose refers to both the family some species, the flowers will bloom Onagraceae and the genus Oeno¬ in one colour and then fade to a dif¬ thera. In this article it will refer to the ferent colour as the day wears on. latter. The evening-primroses are For example, Rock Rose (Oenothera closely related to the Willow-herbs caespitosa) (Figure 1) and White (Epilobium species), Butterfly-weeds Evening-primrose (O. nuttallii) (Fig¬ (Gaura species) and Enchanter’s ure 2) have white flowers that turn Nightshades (Circaea species). pink later in the day.7 Yellow Lau- Evening-primroses are widespread vauxia (O. flava) blooms yellow and throughout the world. In Saskatche¬ then turns pink.7 wan, there are seven species in Evening-primroses occur on dry, eroded areas and around slough margins. Yellow Evening-primrose (O. biennis) (Figure 3) and White Evening-primrose are the most com¬ mon species due to their “weedy” na¬ ture; they are found at the edges of fields and roads in sandy soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Squilchuck State Park
    Rare Plant Inventory and Community Vegetation Survey Squilchuck State Park Cypripedium montanum,mountain lady’s-slipper, on the state Watch list, present at Squilchuck State Park Conducted for The Washington State Pakrs and Recreation Commission PO Box 42650, Olympia, Washington 98504 Conducted by Dana Visalli, Methow Biodiversity Project PO Box 175, Winthrop, WA 98862 In Cooperation with the Pacific Biodiversity Institute December 31, 2004 Rare Plant Inventory and Community Vegetation Survey Squilchuck State Park In the summer of 2004, at the request of and under contract to the Washington State Parks Commission, a rare plant inventory and community vegetation survey was conducted at Squilchuck State Park by Dana Visalli and assisting botanists and GIS technicians. Squilchuck State Park is a 263 acre park on the east slope of the Cascade Mountains in Central Washington, located largely in the transition zone between shrub-steppe and montane forest. Plant community polygons were delineated prior to the initiation of field surveys using or- thophotos and satellite imagery. These polygons were then ground checked during the vegetation surveys, which were conducted simultaneously with the rare plant inventories. All plant associa- tions were determined using theField Guide for Forested Plant Associations of the Wenatchee National Forest(Lilybridge et al, 1995) The Douglas-fir dominated forest above the lodge, on the eastern slopes of the park. The forest on this east slope is in places heavily overstocked and the trees supressed. Vegetation surveys and plant inventories were conducted by two field personnel (one bota- nist, one GIS technician) on June 11th, and again by 4 field workers on August 13 (two botanists and two GIS technicians).
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants and a Brief History of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands
    United States Department of Agriculture Vascular Plants and a Brief Forest Service Rocky Mountain History of the Kiowa and Rita Research Station General Technical Report Blanca National Grasslands RMRS-GTR-233 December 2009 Donald L. Hazlett, Michael H. Schiebout, and Paulette L. Ford Hazlett, Donald L.; Schiebout, Michael H.; and Ford, Paulette L. 2009. Vascular plants and a brief history of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS- GTR-233. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 44 p. Abstract Administered by the USDA Forest Service, the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands occupy 230,000 acres of public land extending from northeastern New Mexico into the panhandles of Oklahoma and Texas. A mosaic of topographic features including canyons, plateaus, rolling grasslands and outcrops supports a diverse flora. Eight hundred twenty six (826) species of vascular plant species representing 81 plant families are known to occur on or near these public lands. This report includes a history of the area; ethnobotanical information; an introductory overview of the area including its climate, geology, vegetation, habitats, fauna, and ecological history; and a plant survey and information about the rare, poisonous, and exotic species from the area. A vascular plant checklist of 816 vascular plant taxa in the appendix includes scientific and common names, habitat types, and general distribution data for each species. This list is based on extensive plant collections and available herbarium collections. Authors Donald L. Hazlett is an ethnobotanist, Director of New World Plants and People consulting, and a research associate at the Denver Botanic Gardens, Denver, CO.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 2 – Fruticose Species
    Appendix 5.2-1 Vegetation Technical Appendix APPENDIX 5.2‐1 Vegetation Technical Appendix Contents Section Page Ecological Land Classification ............................................................................................................ A5.2‐1‐1 Geodatabase Development .............................................................................................. A5.2‐1‐1 Vegetation Community Mapping ..................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐1 Quality Assurance and Quality Control ............................................................................ A5.2‐1‐3 Limitations of Ecological Land Classification .................................................................... A5.2‐1‐3 Field Data Collection ......................................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐3 Supplementary Results ..................................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐4 Rare Vegetation Species and Rare Ecological Communities ........................................................... A5.2‐1‐10 Supplementary Desktop Results ..................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐10 Field Methods ................................................................................................................. A5.2‐1‐16 Supplementary Results ................................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐17 Weed Species
    [Show full text]