COMMENT BOOKS & ARTS

2016). It adopted a tone of magnanimity, crediting Lithuanian biochemist Virginijus Siksnys with observing early on that his findings “pave the way for engineering of universal programmable RNA-guided DNA endonucleases”, and Doudna and her CRISPR co-discoverer with noting “the potential to exploit the system for

RNA-programmable ”. GRAEME MITCHELL/REDUX/EYEVINE Lander’s clear implication was that they were laying the groundwork; Zhang’s group got CRISPR over the finish line. To many of us, such tactics made Team Broad look like the villains of CRISPR. Doudna’s book was a chance to deliver a righteous knockout blow. Instead, we get a counter-narrative just as constructed as Lander’s article. It is written entirely in the first person; co-author Samuel Sternberg, a former student in the Doudna lab, barely surfaces. In that counter-narrative, Doudna had always been interested in gene editing. Her early work was on RNA , or . She developed an impeccable pedigree, doing her PhD with Jack Szostak at Harvard and a postdoc with Tom Cech at the University of Colorado Boulder, before joining the faculty at in New helped to uncover the CRISPR–Cas gene-editing system. Haven, Connecticut. From the mid-1990s, she writes, she was exploring the basic GENOME EDITING molecular mechanisms that “would be able to unlock the full potential of gene editing”. Her work on CRISPR dates to 2006 — six years before the key papers were published — and a call from Berkeley geomicrobiol- That’s the way the ogist . Over coffee, Banfield described the clustered, regularly inter- spaced, short palindromic repeats that kept popping up in her DNA databases of bacteria CRISPR crumbles and archaea. The sequences were ubiqui- tous among these prokaryotes, but unique Nathaniel Comfort finds heroism but little nuance in to each species. This realization “sent a little Jennifer Doudna’s account of her co-discovery. shiver of intrigue down my spine”, Doudna writes. If CRISPR was so widespread, “there was a good chance that was using it he prospect of a memoir from by of the of MIT to do something important”. By 2012, she Jennifer Doudna, a key player in the and Harvard in Cambridge, Massachusetts and her co-workers CRISPR story, quickens the pulse. — did not interfere with Berkeley’s more had characterized the TAnd A Crack in Creation does indeed deliver sweeping patent on with natural CRISPR sys- a welcome perspective on the revolutionary CRISPR. tem, harnessed it as genome-editing technique that puts the Although that battle is over, the war rages a laboratory tool and power of into human hands, with on. Berkeley has already appealed against the developed a modi- many anecdotes and details that only those decision; meanwhile, the European Patent fied system that was close to her may have known. Yet it does Office has ruled in favour of Doudna and programmable, cheap not provide the probing introspection, the Berkeley. Doubtless there are many more pat- and easy to use. nuanced ethical analysis, the moral counter- ents to milk out of this versatile system. And The middle of the point that we CRISPR junkies crave. then there’s the fistful of 66-millimetre gold A Crack in book reels off the After the race for discovery comes the medals they give out in Stockholm each year. Creation: Gene obligatory breathless battle for control of the discovery narrative. So far, the Broad Institute has controlled Editing and the list of potential uses, The stakes for the CRISPR–Cas system are the CRISPR narrative. Rich in funds and tal- Unthinkable generating every- extraordinarily high. In February, the US ent, the Broad melds sleek, high-tech sexiness Power to Control thing from malaria- Evolution Patent and Trademark Office ruled against with a sense of East Coast, old-money privi- JENNIFER A. DOUDNA & free mosquitoes and Doudna and the University of California, lege. Last year, institute director SAMUEL H. STERNBERG police dogs with mus- Berkeley. It found that a patent on the appli- published a now-infamous piece entitled ‘The Houghton Mifflin: cles like Vin Diesel to cation of CRISPR to eukaryotic cells — filed heroes of CRISPR’ (E. Lander Cell 164, 18–28; 2017. the canonical cure for

30 | NATURE | VOL 546 | 1 JUNE 2017©2017 Mac millan Publishers Li mited, part of Spri nger Nature. All ri ghts reserved.

BOOKS & ARTS COMMENT cancer. Thankfully, Doudna counterweights sensationalism with a sober accounting of the risks and responsibilities of applications Books in brief such as altering the genomes of entire pop- ulations of with ‘gene drives’. In The Matter of the Heart: A History of the Heart in Eleven Operations 2015, she sustained doubts about CRISPR Thomas Morris Bodley Head (2017) ever being safe enough for clinical trials, With the cut and thrust of cardiac surgery now demystified, we forget but she has come to embrace editing of the that venturing into the thoracic cavity once seemed as daunting human germ line — inheritable DNA modi- as polar exploration. Or more so: as Thomas Morris reveals in this fication — once it is proved safe. stirring chronicle, even touching a beating heart was long viewed as But the discussion is ultimately unsatisfy- impossible. Told through 11 pivotal operations, it’s a tale of ingenuity, ing. When it is time to “grapple with tricky from Henry Dalton, who in 1891 became the first US surgeon ethical issues”, such as human experimenta- to suture a pericardium, to artificial aortic valves implanted by tion, she baulks, unspooling instead a series robots. It’s rich, too, in alarming details — not least, the injections of of rhetorical questions. Rather than guiding strychnine and whisky that featured in early surgery. us through the ethical thickets of precision genetic engineering, or providing a candid, warts-and-all look at one of the great scien- Chief Engineer: The Man Who Built the Brooklyn Bridge tists of our time, the book mainly polishes Erica Wagner Bloomsbury (2017) her ‘good scientist’ image and rationalizes At its 1883 debut, the Brooklyn Bridge was by far the world’s longest the unfettered self-direction of human evo- suspension bridge — its construction a bravura feat founded on a lution, within liberal bounds of safety, effi- deep understanding of geology. The life of chief engineer Washington cacy and individual choice. Roebling also has a certain monumental quality, as Erica Wagner Rather than dispel the cartoon-character proves in this engrossing, exhaustive biography. The project took the feel of this epic battle, Doudna elaborates on lives of at least 20 workers and of its designer, Roebling’s truculent it. She presents us with a persona so flawless father John; Roebling himself was left with decompression sickness. that it seems more concealing than reveal- But, as Wagner reveals, the central structure and main cables remain ing. She waves away the bloody patent fight a rock-solid testament to engineering acuity and vaulting ambition. as a “disheartening twist” in the story, but the entire biomedical world knows that it was much more. As I read A Crack in Crea- Atomic Adventures tion, I was reminded of Benjamin Franklin’s James Mahaffey Pegasus (2017) “benevolent man”, who, he wrote, “should Nuclear scientist James Mahaffey’s gloriously nerdy tour of atomic allow a few faults in himself, to keep his research ranges over projects from the dead-end to the hare-brained friends in countenance” — and, I would add, (see also M. Peplow Nature 506, 292–293; 2014). Here, for instance, to give him- or herself more depth. are “obscure, third-tier scientist” Ronald Richter — who wasted The narrative often substitutes melo- US$300 million of Argentinian government money on a crackpot drama for dramatic tension. A conference scheme to build a fusion power plant in the early 1950s — as well as in Puerto Rico sees Charpentier and Doudna Mahaffey’s own serious work on the lost dream of cold fusion. You’ll strolling the cobbles of Old San Juan, with learn, too, how to use a smartphone as a Geiger counter and what to Charpentier saying earnestly, “I’m sure that pop in case of atomic attack (phosphorylated aminothiol, apparently). by working together we can figure out the activity” of what became the Cas . “I felt a shiver of excitement as I contemplated The Sum of Small Things: A Theory of the Aspirational Class the possibilities of this project,” Doudna Elizabeth Currid-Halkett Press (2017) writes. When first wrestling with the ethi- US economist Thorstein Veblen’s 1899 Theory of the Leisure cal dilemmas of gene editing, she dreams of Class held a mirror up to rich Americans deep-dyed in Gilded meeting Adolf Hitler, who demands to know Age ostentation. Here, Elizabeth Currid-Halkett updates Veblen’s the secrets of her technique. She wakes, of analysis, arguing that the leisure class is now aspirational, and that course, freshly determined to ensure that consumption has become inconspicuous — all heirloom vegetables CRISPR is not put to nefarious use. and electric cars. Yet, ‘smart’ elites contribute to inequality just as The larger purpose of A Crack in Crea- surely as yesterday’s luxury addicts. A key companion to Robert tion, clearly, is to show that Doudna is Putnam’s survey of dwindling US social mobility, Our Kids (Simon the true hero of CRISPR. And ultimately, and Schuster, 2015; see B. Kiser Nature 520, 155; 2015). despite the book’s flaws, I’m convinced. Nominators and the Nobel Committee will need to read this book. But CRISPR binge- A Hole in the Wind watchers like me still await a truly satisfying David Goodrich Pegasus (2017) account — one that is insightful, candid and At the end of a high-level career in climate , David Goodrich contextualized. ■ cycled from Delaware to Oregon looking for a “hole in the wind” — a human future in the unrelenting march of climate change. Nathaniel Comfort is of the Over a rain- and sweat-soaked 6,700 kilometres, he encountered history of at Johns Hopkins Pennsylvanians at the fracking frontline, forest fires in Wyoming and University in Baltimore, Maryland. He is scores of people in diners, labs and schools profoundly concerned working on a biography of DNA. about coming realities. Ultimately, he sees humanity’s capacity for e-mail: [email protected] economic transformation and reform as up to the job. Barbara Kiser

©2017 Mac millan Publishers Li mited, part of Spri nger Nature. All ri ghts rese1rv eJUNEd. 2017 | VOL 546 | NATURE | 31