4.09 Chemical Defense and Toxins of Lower Terrestrial and Freshwater Animals Konrad Dettner, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

4.09 Chemical Defense and Toxins of Lower Terrestrial and Freshwater Animals Konrad Dettner, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany 4.09 Chemical Defense and Toxins of Lower Terrestrial and Freshwater Animals Konrad Dettner, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany ª 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 4.09.1 Introduction 387 4.09.2 Alveolata 388 4.09.3 Porifera 390 4.09.4 Cnidaria 390 4.09.5 Platyhelminthes (Flatworms) 391 4.09.6 Nemathelminthes: Nematoda 391 4.09.7 Rotatoria (Rotifers) 391 4.09.8 Nemertini 391 4.09.9 Mollusca 392 4.09.10 Annelida: Clitellata: Oligochaeta 393 4.09.11 Annelida: Clitellata: Hirudinea 394 4.09.12 Arthropoda: Onychophora 394 4.09.13 Arthropoda: Tardigrada 395 4.09.14 Arthropoda: Crustacea, Ostracoda 395 4.09.15 Arthropoda: Crustacea, Decapoda 395 4.09.16 Arthropoda: Crustacea, Amphipoda 395 4.09.17 Arthropoda: Crustacea, Isopoda 395 4.09.18 Arthropoda: Chelicerata, Scorpiones 396 4.09.19 Arthropoda: Chelicerata, Pseudoscorpiones 396 4.09.20 Arthropoda: Chelicerata, Acari (Mites) 396 4.09.21 Arthropoda: Chelicerata, Opiliones 398 4.09.22 Arthropoda: Chelicerata, Pedipalpi 400 4.09.23 Arthropoda: Chelicerata, Araneae 401 4.09.24 Arthropoda: Myriapoda: Opisthogoneata (Centipedes) 402 4.09.25 Arthropoda: Myriapoda: Progoneata: Diplopoda (Millipedes) and Symphyla 403 References 407 4.09.1 Introduction Terrestrial and freshwater animals possess various mechanisms for defense against predatory or patho- genic organisms.1,2 In all animals, defensive substances may be present in tissues, the blood (nonglandular secretion), and exocrine eversible or noneversible glands. Occasionally, such compounds are found in regurgitants or enteric discharges and defecations.3 Certainly, all developmental stages from eggs to adults,4 and also from monocellular to multicellular organisms, that is, from protozoans to vertebrates, may be chemically protected. Many of these natural products represent simple, widely distributed chemicals; however, there are also various unique products,5 frequently restricted to special taxa. The glands may represent oozing, spraying, reactor, or tracheal glands.3 It is also of interest to investigate whether animals manufacture their own toxic or distasteful compounds (intrinsic origin) or whether behavior-modifying chemicals are acquired from host plants, other animals, bacteria, or fungi (extrinsic 387 388 Chemical Defense and Toxins of Lower Terrestrial and Freshwater Animals origin). Considerable biosynthetic knowledge is especially available in insects,6 while data from other animals are less available or missing. Usually, defensive compounds may exert their effect via foul smell (repellents) or bad taste (deterrent). Very often, defensive compounds may induce cleaning behavior in theaggressor,givingthepreytimetoescape.Thereareanumberofirritantcompoundsthatmayalso induce pain. Examples include nonspecific toxicants, or hot secretions. Especially, urticating hairs and delivery of venom by injectable means, for example, stings or fangs, are widely observed. Venoms are usually complex aqueous mixtures of proteins (enzymes), peptides, carbohydrates, nucleosides, biogenic amines, amino acids, lipids, and metallic cations. Many of these toxins represent presynaptic and postsynaptic neurotoxins, cytotoxins, myotoxins, and cardiotoxins. These poisons may act immediately or may show delayed effects (e.g., emetics, vesicants). Certain animals may secrete sticky components that harden like glues and incapacitate attackers.3 The chemistry of these sticky, slimy, or resinous fluids is often not well known. This chapter focuses on low molecular defensive compounds, typical products of secondary metabolism; however, it also covers principal data on high-molecular, behavior-modifying chemicals. Taxonomically, this compilation covers all protozoan and metazoan taxa apart from Deuterostomia (especially vertebrates) and Insecta. Allelochemicals of insects and vertebrates are not included as these have been recently reviewed,7,8 and the actual data will be published elsewhere. Whenever possible, actual reviews are cited and updated. Chemical structures of chiral compounds depicted here reflect the relative or absolute configurations of the substances as far as they are known today. Concerning a wide array of organisms, there exist actual surveys of chemical defenses of insects,3,11–15 arthropods,2,3,4–7,9,10–16 or animals in general.13–15 However, until now, many taxonomically lower animal taxa have never been reviewed with respect to chemical defense. Therefore, here such phenomena are cited in selected taxa even if no or scarce chemical data on the relevant natural compounds are available. Various reviews approach venoms and toxins of animals more generally,15–21 and sometimes may include low molecular defensive com- pounds.16 Taxonomic data are especially taken from Dettner and Peters,22 Storch and Welsch,23 Westheide and Rieger,24 and Resh and Carde´.25 Chemicals of extrinsic origin are not dealt with in detail; however, they may be of special interest if they are chemically modified during metabolic processes. 4.09.2 Alveolata Alveolata include the former unicellular Dinoflagellata, Ciliophora (Ciliata), and Apicomplexa (Sporozoa). It is interesting to note that toxic species within unicellular eukaryotes seem to be restricted to representatives of Alveolata. Among 2500 species of Dinoflagellata, several mostly photosynthetic and marine species produce or accumulate toxins.26 Only representatives of the freshwater and marine genus Gymnodinium are known to 27 produce the pentacyclic imine gymnodimine (1), which is moderately toxic (LD50: intraperitoneal injection, mouse, 96 mg kgÀ1). Some heterotrich ciliates possess specialized exocytotic organelles, the extrusomes. Upon molestation, these structures may discharge material to the cell surface. Especially in ciliates, there are haptocysts (with toxic enzymes), mucocysts (with a protective coat), trichocysts (spindle-shaped bodies with paracrystalline matrix), and toxicysts (tubular structures).28 Recently, it was discovered that the blue and red pigments stentorin (2) and blepharismin (3), two polyketides from the exocytotic organelles of Stentor and Blepharisma, primarily act as chemical defense of these Ciliophora against small predators.29 The same function was ascribed to climacostol (4, 5-(Z)-non-2-enylresorcinol) and the two congeners of climacostol (5, 5-(Z,Z)-undeca-2,5-dienylresorcinol; 6, 5-(Z,Z,Z)-undeca-2,5,8-trienylresorcinol), three colorless lipids isolated from the heterotrich ciliate Climacostomum.30 In addition, spirostomin, spiro[(2.5-dimethyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydronaphthalene-1,4-dione)-8,69-(pyrane-29,59- dione)], was identified from the ciliate Spirostomum teres.31 It exhibits toxic activities against predatory ciliates. As shown by bioassays, the karyorelictid ciliate Loxodes striatus may release toxin-containing yellow-brown extrusomes, which repel predators such as Dileptus (Ciliata) and Stenostomum (Turbellaria).32 Other high molecular toxins were recorded from the Apicomplexa (Sporozoa). A protein–hyaluronic acid complex (toxotoxin) was described from peritoneal exudates of mice, which is probably produced by hosts in OH O OH OH O OH H OH O O HO O HO OH OH HO HO OH OH HO N OH [1] [2][3] OH O OH OH O OH HO [4] OH OH HO HO [5] [6] 390 Chemical Defense and Toxins of Lower Terrestrial and Freshwater Animals response to coccid infections.33 Moreover, there are known toxic Toxoplasma lysates, such as toxoplasmine, extracts from the cysts of Sarcocystis (Sarcocystin), or an Eimeria toxin.34 A further toxofactor, a glycoprotein (molecular mass (MM) 50 000–100 000), was found to be associated with Toxoplasma gondii.35 [8] HOOC N [9] [13] HOOC N [10] HOOC CO OH HN O O O HO S [11] HOOC OH O O OH [12] HOOC [7] 4.09.3 Porifera The sessile sponges (10 000 species), especially marine species36 and also dry powders of freshwater species,37 may contain a large array of bioactive molecules and may be even used as pharmaceuticals. Also freshwater species of the family Spongillidae contain more than 100 novel unusual and rare fatty acids, lipids, and sterols.38 From the freshwater species Ephydatia syriaca, syriacin (7) was isolated. It is a novel unusual sulfated ceramide glycoside containing a branched long-chain fatty acid, that is, (all Z)-34S-methylhexatriaconta-5,9,12,15,18,21- hexaenoic acid.39 Syriacin showed a distinct antifeeding activity against goldfish. Other freshwater species of the genera Ephydatia, Nudospongilla, and Cortispongilla produce multibranched polyunsaturated and long-chain fatty acids (8–12) that are active against Gram-positive bacteria and have been proved to be toxic against the shrimp Artemia salina.40 Among these compounds, 9 shows an unusual carbon skeleton as the 6,9-methyl branching includes two unsubstituted carbons, which is not in line with a typical biosynthetic scheme involving acetate and propanoate. Finally, a Lubomirskia species from the Lake Baikal and its symbiotic dinoflagellates, which are related to Gymnodinium sanguineum (see gymnodimine (1)), contain the polyether toxin okadaic acid. In the sponge, this strong protein phosphatase 2A inhibitor is present in the free form as well as in a protein- bound state. The authors suppose that the toxin may contribute to the cold resistance of the sponge.41 4.09.4 Cnidaria Just as Porifera, the sessile, predatory, and often soft-bodied Cnidaria (9200 species) depend on offensive and defensive allomones for prey capture and survival. This is also true for the small group of freshwater species belonging to Hydrina (Capitata). The nematocyst venom of Hydra vulgaris has been reported
Recommended publications
  • Archiv Für Naturgeschichte
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Archiv für Naturgeschichte Jahr/Year: 1905 Band/Volume: 71-2_2 Autor(en)/Author(s): Lucas Robert Artikel/Article: Arachnida für 1904. 925-993 © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at Arachnida fiir 1904. Bearbeitet von Dr. Robert Lucas. A. Publikationen (Autoren alphabetisch). d'Agostino, A. P. Prima nota dei Ragni deU'Avelliiiese. Avellino 1/8 4 pp. Banks, Nathan (1). Some spiders and mites from Bermuda Islands. Trans. Connect. Acad. vol. XI, 1903 p. 267—275. — {%), The Arachnida of Florida. Proc. Acad. Philad. Jan. 1904 p. 120—147, 2 pls. (VII u. VIII). — (3). Some Arachnida from CaUfornia. Proc. Californ. Acad. III No. 13. p. 331—374, pls. 38—41. — (4). Arachnida (in) Alaska; from the Harriman Alaska Ex- pedition vol. VIII p. 37—45, 11 pls. — Abdruck der Publikation von 1900 aus d. Proc. Washington Acad. vol. II p. 477—486. Berthoumieu, L' Abbe. Revision de l'entomologie dans 1' Antiquite. Arachnides p. 197—200 (Chelifer, Scorpiones, Galeodes, Aranea, Ixodes, Tyroglyphus et Cheyletus). Eev. Sei. Bourbonnais 1904, p. 167. Bolton, H. The Palaeontology of the Lancashire Goal Measures. Manchester. Mus. Owens Coli. Publ. 50. Mus. Handb. p. 378—415. — Abdruck aus Trans. Manchester geol. min. Soc. vol. 28. Brown, Rob. (I). Rectifications tardives mais necessaires. Proc- verb. Soc. Linn. Bordeaux, vol. 59 p. LXVIII—LXX. — Auch über Arachniden. Calman, W. T. Arachnida in Zool. Record for 1903 vol. XL. XI 47 pp. Cambridge, F. 0. Pickard. 1901. Further Contributions towards the Knowledge of the Arachnida of Epping Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Subterranean Biodiversity and Depth Distribution of Myriapods in Forested Scree Slopes of Central Europe
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys Subterranean930: 117–137 (2020) biodiversity and depth distribution of myriapods in forested scree slopes of... 117 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.930.48914 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Subterranean biodiversity and depth distribution of myriapods in forested scree slopes of Central Europe Beáta Haľková1, Ivan Hadrián Tuf 2, Karel Tajovský3, Andrej Mock1 1 Institute of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia 2 De- partment of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic 3 Institute of Soil Biology, Biology Centre CAS, České Budějovice, Czech Republic Corresponding author: Beáta Haľková ([email protected]) Academic editor: L. Dányi | Received 28 November 2019 | Accepted 10 February 2020 | Published 28 April 2020 http://zoobank.org/84BEFD1B-D8FA-4B05-8481-C0735ADF2A3C Citation: Haľková B, Tuf IH, Tajovský K, Mock A (2020) Subterranean biodiversity and depth distribution of myriapods in forested scree slopes of Central Europe. In: Korsós Z, Dányi L (Eds) Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Myriapodology, Budapest, Hungary. ZooKeys 930: 117–137. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.930.48914 The paper is dedicated to Christian Juberthie (12 Mar 1931–7 Nov 2019), the author of the concept of MSS (milieu souterrain superficiel) and the doyen of modern biospeleology Abstract The shallow underground of rock debris is a unique animal refuge. Nevertheless, the research of this habitat lags far behind the study of caves and soil, due to technical and time-consuming demands. Data on Myriapoda in scree habitat from eleven localities in seven different geomorphological units of the Czech and Slovak Republics were processed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Planktonic Protist Interactome: Where Do We Stand After a Century of Research?
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/587352; this version posted May 2, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Bjorbækmo et al., 23.03.2019 – preprint copy - BioRxiv The planktonic protist interactome: where do we stand after a century of research? Marit F. Markussen Bjorbækmo1*, Andreas Evenstad1* and Line Lieblein Røsæg1*, Anders K. Krabberød1**, and Ramiro Logares2,1** 1 University of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Section for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology (Evogene), Blindernv. 31, N- 0316 Oslo, Norway 2 Institut de Ciències del Mar (CSIC), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 37-49, ES-08003, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain * The three authors contributed equally ** Corresponding authors: Ramiro Logares: Institute of Marine Sciences (ICM-CSIC), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta 37-49, 08003, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. Phone: 34-93-2309500; Fax: 34-93-2309555. [email protected] Anders K. Krabberød: University of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Section for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology (Evogene), Blindernv. 31, N-0316 Oslo, Norway. Phone +47 22845986, Fax: +47 22854726. [email protected] Abstract Microbial interactions are crucial for Earth ecosystem function, yet our knowledge about them is limited and has so far mainly existed as scattered records. Here, we have surveyed the literature involving planktonic protist interactions and gathered the information in a manually curated Protist Interaction DAtabase (PIDA). In total, we have registered ~2,500 ecological interactions from ~500 publications, spanning the last 150 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Order Number 9111799 Evolutionary morphology of the locomotor apparatus in Arachnida Shultz, Jeffrey Walden, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Malelane Safari Lodge, Kruger National Park
    INVERTEBRATE SPECIALIST REPORT Prepared For: Malelane Safari Lodge, Kruger National Park Dalerwa Ventures for Wildlife cc P. O. Box 1424 Hoedspruit 1380 Fax: 086 212 6424 Cell (Elize) 074 834 1977 Cell (Ian): 084 722 1988 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 3 2. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT .................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Safari Lodge Development .................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.2 Invertebrate Specialist Report ............................................................................................................... 5 2.2 TERMS OF REFERENCE ......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.3 DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND SURROUNDING ENVIRONMENT ......................................................................................... 8 3. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................. 9 3.1 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • INSECTA MUNDIA Journal of World Insect Systematics
    INSECTA MUNDI A Journal of World Insect Systematics 0573 A fourth account of centipede (Chilopoda) predation on bats T. Todd Lindley 3300 Teton Lane Norman, OK 73072 USA Jesús Molinari Departamento de Biología Universidad de Los Andes Mérida 5101 Venezuela Rowland M. Shelley Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology University of Tennessee Knoxville, TN 37996 USA Barry N. Steger 107 Saint James Street Borger, TX 79007 USA Date of Issue: August 25, 2017 CENTER FOR SYSTEMATIC ENTOMOLOGY, INC., Gainesville, FL T. Todd Lindley, Jesús Molinari, Rowland M. Shelley, and Barry N. Steger A fourth account of centipede (Chilopoda) predation on bats Insecta Mundi 0573: 1–4 ZooBank Registered: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:53C2B8CA-DB7E-4921-94C5-0CA7A8F7A400 Published in 2017 by Center for Systematic Entomology, Inc. P. O. Box 141874 Gainesville, FL 32614-1874 USA http://centerforsystematicentomology.org/ Insecta Mundi is a journal primarily devoted to insect systematics, but articles can be published on any non-marine arthropod. Topics considered for publication include systematics, taxonomy, nomenclature, checklists, faunal works, and natural history. Insecta Mundi will not consider works in the applied sciences (i.e. medical entomology, pest control research, etc.), and no longer publishes book reviews or editorials. Insecta Mundi publishes original research or discoveries in an inexpensive and timely manner, distributing them free via open access on the internet on the date of publication. Insecta Mundi is referenced or abstracted by several sources including the Zoological Record, CAB Ab- stracts, etc. Insecta Mundi is published irregularly throughout the year, with completed manuscripts assigned an individual number. Manuscripts must be peer reviewed prior to submission, after which they are reviewed by the editorial board to ensure quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa,A New Species of Mastigoproctus
    Zootaxa 1463: 39–45 (2007) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2007 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A new species of Mastigoproctus Pocock, 1894 (Thelyphonida: Thelyphonidae) from Venezuela CARLOS VIQUEZ1 & LUIS F. DE ARMAS2 1Investigador Asociado. Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad (INBio), Santo Domingo, Heredia, P. O. Box 22-3100, Costa Rica. E-mail: [email protected] 2P. O. Box 4327, San Antonio de los Baños, La Habana 32500, Cuba. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract A new species of Venezuelan whip scorpions belonging to the genus Mastigoproctus Pocock is herein described from Bolivar state. This new species mainly differs from the Venezuelan Mastigoproctus formidabilis Hirst, and the Colom- bian Mastigoproctus colombianus Mello-Leitão in male pedipalp sculpture and proportions as well as in female genitalia. Now, Mastigoproctus is represented in Venezuela by two apparently very related species. Key words: Thelyphonida, Uropygi, Mastigoproctus, taxonomy, South America, Venezuela Introduction Whip scorpions (Thelyphonida) form one of the smaller arachnid orders (Harvey, 2002, 2003), representing only 0.1% of the arachnids of the world. However, their large size (most are longer than 40 mm length from the pedipalps to the base of the flagellum) and distinctive vinegary odor make them better known for the peo- ple than some of its relatives, e.g., the ricinuleids and schizomids. Whip scorpions are represented in South America by only two genera: Mastigoproctus Pocock and Thely- phonellus Pocock, the first of which shows a higher species richness. A third genus, Amauromastigon Mello- Leitão, was synonymized with Mastigoproctus by Rowland (2002).
    [Show full text]
  • A Sacrificial Millipede Altruistically Protects Its Swarm Using a Drone
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN A sacrificial millipede altruistically protects its swarm using a drone blood enzyme, mandelonitrile Received: 05 January 2016 Accepted: 29 April 2016 oxidase Published: 06 June 2016 Yuko Ishida1,2, Yasumasa Kuwahara1,2, Mohammad Dadashipour1,2, Atsutoshi Ina1,2, Takuya Yamaguchi1,2, Masashi Morita1,2, Yayoi Ichiki1,2 & Yasuhisa Asano1,2 Soldiers of some eusocial insects exhibit an altruistic self-destructive defense behavior in emergency situations when attacked by large enemies. The swarm-forming invasive millipede, Chamberlinius hualienensis, which is not classified as eusocial animal, exudes irritant chemicals such as benzoyl cyanide as a defensive secretion. Although it has been thought that this defensive chemical was converted from mandelonitrile, identification of the biocatalyst has remained unidentified for 40 years. Here, we identify the novel blood enzyme, mandelonitrile oxidase (ChuaMOX), which stoichiometrically catalyzes oxygen consumption and synthesis of benzoyl cyanide and hydrogen peroxide from mandelonitrile. Interestingly the enzymatic activity is suppressed at a blood pH of 7, and the enzyme is segregated by membranes of defensive sacs from mandelonitrile which has a pH of 4.6, the optimum pH for ChuaMOX activity. In addition, strong body muscle contractions are necessary for de novo synthesis of benzoyl cyanide. We propose that, to protect its swarm, the sacrificial millipede also applies a self- destructive defense strategy—the endogenous rupturing of the defensive sacs to mix ChuaMOX and mandelonitrile at an optimum pH. Further study of defensive systems in primitive arthropods will pave the way to elucidate the evolution of altruistic defenses in the animal kingdom. Swarm-forming animals have unique defense systems for protection.
    [Show full text]
  • The Whip Scorpion, Mastigoproctus Giganteus
    500 Florida Entomologist 92(3) September 2009 THE WHIP SCORPION, MASTIGOPROCTUS GIGANTEUS (UROPYGI: THELYPHONIDAE), PREYS ON THE CHEMICALLY DEFENDED FLORIDA SCRUB MILLIPEDE, FLORIDOBOLUS PENNERI (SPIROBOLIDA: FLORIDOBOLIDAE) JAMES E. CARREL1 AND ERIC J. BRITT2, 3 1University of Missouri, Division of Biological Sciences, 209 Tucker Hall, Columbia, MO 65211-7400 USA 2University of South Florida, Division of Integrative Biology, 4242 East Fowler Avenue, SCA 110, Tampa, FL 33620 USA 2, 3Current address: Archbold Biological Station, 123 Main Drive, Venus, FL 33960 The rare Florida scrub millipede, Floridobolus intervals in 96 pitfall traps arranged in sets of 12 penneri Causey, is confined to xeric, sandy scrub each at 8 randomly chosen sites in scrubby flat- habitats in the southern part of the narrow Lake woods near the southern end of the Archbold Bio- Wales Ridge in Polk and Highlands Counties, logical Station, Highlands County, Florida (rang- Florida (Deyrup 1994). Although large in size ing from 27°08” 20” N, 81°21’ 18” W to 27°07’ 19” (adult body length of about 90 mm and width of N, 81°21’ 54” W, elevation 40-43 m). Each trap about 11.5 mm), little is known about this cylin- consisted of a plastic bucket (17.5 cm diameter × drical animal because it is restricted in distribu- 19 cm depth, 3.8 liter capacity) placed in the tion and is nocturnally active aboveground only in ground so that the rim was flush with the sandy mid-summer; it spends most of its secretive life soil and filled with 3-5 cm of sandy soil. During buried in sand (Deyrup 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Araneae, Dipluridae, Masteriinae
    Universidade de São Paulo Victor Passanha Revisão taxonômica das espécies neotropicais de Masteriinae Simon, 1889 (Araneae, Dipluridae, Masteriinae). Taxonomic revision of neotropical Masteriinae Simon, 1889 (Araneae, Dipluridae, Masteriinae) São Paulo 2015 Victor Passanha Revisão taxonômica das espécies neotropicais de Masteriinae Simon, 1889 (Araneae, Dipluridae, Masteriinae). Taxonomic revision of neotropical Masteriinae Simon, 1889 (Araneae, Dipluridae, Masteriinae) Dissertação apresentada ao Instituto de Biociências da Universidade de São Paulo, para a obtenção de Título de Mestre em Ciências, na Área de Zoologia. Orientador(a): Antonio D. Brescovit São Paulo 2015 RESUMO O objetivo principal deste trabalho é a revisão das espécies neotropicais de Masteriinae. Após análise de um extenso material de coleções, Masteriinae é redefinida e apresenta hoje três gêneros: Masteria L. Koch, 1873 com 21 espécies neotropicais, Striamea Raven, 1981 com duas e Siremata gen. nov. com três espécies, são exclusivas da região Neotropical. Masteria é revisada e diagnosticada com base na espécie-tipo e separa-se dos demais gêneros por apresentar padrão ocular retangular em um cômoro baixo, presença de processo prolateral na tíbia da perna I dos machos e depressão basal e megaespinho basal no metatarso I dos machos. Masteria hirsuta L. Koch, 1873 é aqui redescrita e diagnosticada para comparação, uma vez que é da fauna asiática. A genitália da fêmea é estudada com detalhes, uma vez que pela primeira vez seus caracteres internos foram analisados. As espécies neotropicais de Masteria são separadas em quatro grupos, definidos pelo formato do bulbo, exceto M. pecki, da qual o macho é desconhecido. As fêmeas de M. golovatchi Alayón, 1995 e M.
    [Show full text]
  • Pusillus Poseidon's Guide to Protozoa
    Pusillus Poseidon’s guide to PROTOZOA GENERAL NOTES ABOUT PROTOZOANS Protozoa are also called protists. The word “protist” is the more general term and includes all types of single-celled eukaryotes, whereas “protozoa” is more often used to describe the protists that are animal-like (as opposed to plant-like or fungi-like). Protists are measured using units called microns. There are 1000 microns in one millimeter. A millimeter is the smallest unit on a metric ruler and can be estimated with your fingers: The traditional way of classifying protists is by the way they look (morphology), by the way they move (mo- tility), and how and what they eat. This gives us terms such as ciliates, flagellates, ameboids, and all those colors of algae. Recently, the classification system has been overhauled and has become immensely complicated. (Infor- mation about DNA is now the primary consideration for classification, rather than how a creature looks or acts.) If you research these creatures on Wikipedia, you will see this new system being used. Bear in mind, however, that the categories are constantly shifting as we learn more and more about protist DNA. Here is a visual overview that might help you understand the wide range of similarities and differences. Some organisms fit into more than one category and some don’t fit well into any category. Always remember that classification is an artificial construct made by humans. The organisms don’t know anything about it and they don’t care what we think! CILIATES Eats anything smaller than Blepharisma looks slightly pink because it Blepharisma itself, even smaller Bleph- makes a red pigment that senses light (simi- arismas.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Entelegyne Spiders: Affinities of the Family Penestomidae
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 55 (2010) 786–804 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogeny of entelegyne spiders: Affinities of the family Penestomidae (NEW RANK), generic phylogeny of Eresidae, and asymmetric rates of change in spinning organ evolution (Araneae, Araneoidea, Entelegynae) Jeremy A. Miller a,b,*, Anthea Carmichael a, Martín J. Ramírez c, Joseph C. Spagna d, Charles R. Haddad e, Milan Rˇezácˇ f, Jes Johannesen g, Jirˇí Král h, Xin-Ping Wang i, Charles E. Griswold a a Department of Entomology, California Academy of Sciences, 55 Music Concourse Drive, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA b Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum Naturalis, Postbus 9517 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands c Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales – CONICET, Av. Angel Gallardo 470, C1405DJR Buenos Aires, Argentina d William Paterson University of New Jersey, 300 Pompton Rd., Wayne, NJ 07470, USA e Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa f Crop Research Institute, Drnovská 507, CZ-161 06, Prague 6-Ruzyneˇ, Czech Republic g Institut für Zoologie, Abt V Ökologie, Universität Mainz, Saarstraße 21, D-55099, Mainz, Germany h Laboratory of Arachnid Cytogenetics, Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic i College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China article info abstract Article history: Penestomine spiders were first described from females only and placed in the family Eresidae. Discovery Received 20 April 2009 of the male decades later brought surprises, especially in the morphology of the male pedipalp, which Revised 17 February 2010 features (among other things) a retrolateral tibial apophysis (RTA).
    [Show full text]