1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Case 2:19-cv-00245-CJC-AFM Document 143 Filed 12/23/19 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:8605 1 HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP Colm A. Moran (Bar No. 202685) 2 [email protected] Alyssa Saviss (Bar No. 318387) 3 [email protected] 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400 4 Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: (310) 785-4600 5 Facsimile: (310) 785-4601 6 HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP Samaa Haridi (Bar No. 210938) 7 [email protected] 390 Madison Avenue 8 New York, New York 10017 Telephone: (212) 918-3000 9 Facsimile: (212) 918-3100 10 Attorneys for Defendants Automobiles Peugeot SA and Isabel Salas Mendez 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 WESTERN DIVISION 15 ALCON ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, Case No. 2:19-cv-00245 CJC (AFMx) 16 Plaintiff, The Honorable Cormac J. Carney 17 v. NOTICE OF MOTION AND 18 MOTION TO DISMISS BY AUTOMOBILES PEUGEOT SA, a DEFENDANTS AUTOMOBILES 19 France société anonyme; ISABEL PEUGEOT SA AND ISABEL SALAS SALAS MENDEZ, an individual; MENDEZ; MEMORANDUM OF 20 PUBLICIS MEDIA FRANCE, S.A., a POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN France société anonyme; HERVE SUPPORT THEREOF 21 MONTRON, an individual; MAMOU SISSOKO, an individual; and DOES 1- Date: March 2, 2020 22 10, inclusive, Time: 1:30 p.m. Courtroom 7C 23 Defendant. [Proposed Order Filed Concurrently 24 Herewith] 25 26 27 28 HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO A TTO RN EY S A T L AW (2:19-CV-00245 CJC (AFMX)) L OS A NGELES DISMISS Case 2:19-cv-00245-CJC-AFM Document 143 Filed 12/23/19 Page 2 of 16 Page ID #:8606 1 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on March 2, 2020, at 1:30 p.m., or as soon as 3 thereafter as the matter may be heard before the Honorable Judge Cormac J. 4 Carney, in Courtroom 7C of the United States District Courthouse for the Central 5 District of California, Western Division, 350 W 1st Street, Los Angeles, California, 6 Defendants Automobiles Peugeot SA (Peugeot) and Isabel Salas Mendez (Mendez) 7 will and hereby do move the Court for an order dismissing in its entirety Plaintiff’s 8 First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (ECF No. 8) without prejudice under Rule 41 9 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to plead a “short and plain 10 statement” of the claims for relief and failure to make each allegation “simple, 11 concise, and direct,” as required under Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil 12 Procedure. 13 Alternatively, Peugeot and Mendez will and hereby do move the Court for an 14 order striking the FAC pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) due to the 15 pleading containing excessive “redundant, immaterial, [or] impertinent” matter. 16 Alternatively, Peugeot and Mendez will and hereby do move the Court for an 17 order partially dismissing the FAC with prejudice as to Count 5 (Fraud) for failure 18 to state a claim for relief under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil 19 Procedure. 20 This motion is based on this Notice of Motion and Motion, the 21 accompanying Memorandum of Points and Authorities, the pleadings on file with 22 this Court, and such arguments and authorities as may be presented at or before the 23 hearing. 24 25 26 27 28 HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO A TTO RN EY S A T L AW - 2 - (2:19-CV-00245 CJC (AFMX)) L OS A NGELES DISMISS Case 2:19-cv-00245-CJC-AFM Document 143 Filed 12/23/19 Page 3 of 16 Page ID #:8607 1 This motion is made following the conference of counsel pursuant to L.R. 7- 2 3 which took place on December 16, 2019. 3 4 Dated: December 23, 2019 HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 5 6 _________________________ 7 Colm A. Moran 8 Samaa Haridi Alyssa Saviss 9 Attorneys for Defendants Automobiles Peugeot SA and Isabel Salas Mendez 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO A TTO RN EY S A T L AW - 3 - (2:19-CV-00245 CJC (AFMX)) L OS A NGELES DISMISS Case 2:19-cv-00245-CJC-AFM Document 143 Filed 12/23/19 Page 4 of 16 Page ID #:8608 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Page 3 I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1 4 5 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND .......................................................................... 2 6 III. LEGAL STANDARDS .................................................................................... 4 7 A. Rule 8 Requires Simple, Concise, Direct Allegations and a Short and Plain Statement of Claims. ........................................................................................ 4 8 B. Rule 12(f) Allows the Court to Strike from a Pleading Any Redundant, 9 Immaterial, Impertinent, or Scandalous Matter. .............................................. 4 10 C. Rule 12(b)(6) Requires Dismissal For Failure to State a Claim. ..................... 5 11 IV. ARGUMENT ................................................................................................... 6 12 A. The FAC Is So Prolix That The Peugeot Defendants Cannot Fairly Be Required To Respond, And It Should Be Dismissed. ...................................... 6 13 B. In the Alternative, the Court Should Strike the FAC. ...................................... 9 14 C. The Fifth Count For Fraud Based On An Alleged Contractual Duty Is Barred 15 As A Matter Of Law. ........................................................................................ 9 16 V. CONCLUSION .............................................................................................. 10 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP A TTO RN EY S A T L AW TABLE OF CONTENTS - i - (2:19-CV-00245 CJC (AFMX)) L OS A NGELES Case 2:19-cv-00245-CJC-AFM Document 143 Filed 12/23/19 Page 5 of 16 Page ID #:8609 1 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES 2 Page(s) 3 Cases 4 5 Applied Equip. Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd., 7 Cal. 4th 503 (1994) ............................................................................................. 9 6 Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 7 556 U.S. 662 (2009) .............................................................................................. 5 8 Audigier Brand Mgmt. v. Perez, 9 2012 WL 5470888 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 5. 2012) ........................................................ 9 10 Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 11 550 U.S. 544 (2007) .............................................................................................. 5 12 Cates Constr., Inc. v. Talbot Partners, 13 21 Cal. 4th 28 (1999) ............................................................................................. 9 14 Chubb Custom Ins. Co. v. Space Sys./Loral, Inc., 710 F.3d 946 (9th Cir. 2013) ................................................................................. 6 15 16 Erlich v. Menezes, 21 Cal. 4th 543 (1999) ........................................................................................... 9 17 Freeman & Mills, Inc. v. Belcher Oil Co., 18 11 Cal. 4th 85 (1995) ............................................................................................. 9 19 Hatch v. Reliance Ins. Co., 20 758 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1985) ................................................................................. 6 21 Karabajakyan v. Schwarzenegger, 22 No. CV 06-0541-ODW, 2007 WL 9706273 (C.D. Cal. June 1, 2007) ...................................................................................................................... 4 23 24 Mann v. Boatright, 477 F.3d 1140 (10th Cir. 2007) ............................................................................. 4 25 McHenry v. Renne, 26 84 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 1996) ......................................................................... 4, 6, 8 27 Mendez v. Draham, 28 182 F. Supp. 2d 430 (D.N.J. 2002) ........................................................................ 6 HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP A TTO RN EY S A T L AW TABLE OF AUTHORITIES - i - (2:19-CV-00245 CJC (AFMX)) L OS A NGELES Case 2:19-cv-00245-CJC-AFM Document 143 Filed 12/23/19 Page 6 of 16 Page ID #:8610 1 Neilson v. Union Bank of Cal., N.A., 2 290 F. Supp. 2d 1101 (C.D. Cal. 2003) ................................................................. 5 3 Nevijel v. North Coast Life Ins. Co., 4 651 F.2d 671 (9th Cir. 1981) ................................................................................. 4 5 Sibley v. Choice Hotels Int’l, Inc. 304 FRD 125 (ED NY 2015)................................................................................. 8 6 7 Sidney–Vinstein v. A.H. Robins Co., 697 F.2d 880 (9th Cir. 1983) ................................................................................. 5 8 Starr v. Baca, 9 652 F.3d 1202 (9th Cir. 2011) ............................................................................... 5 10 Whitsitt v. Industrial Empl. Dist. Ass’n, 11 No. C 13-00396 ..................................................................................................... 6 12 Other Authorities 13 Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 .............................................................................................. 1, 4, 6, 9 14 Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a) ..................................................................................................... 6 15 16 Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2)............................................................................................. 4, 6 17 Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(d) ..................................................................................................... 4 18 Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) .......................................................................................... 1, 5 19 Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) ..........................................................................................