DOCSLIB.ORG

The Complete History of Jack the Rip

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Complete History of Jack the Rip The complete history of jack the rip Continue Adding new material to his complete jack the Ripper story, crime writer and historian Philip Sugden has painstakingly uncovered a lot of new and still neglected material, including a new Ripper sighting, a possible earlier attack, and a potential American connection. As the Ripper Dan Farson points out: This is indeed the final score, for the chair of the detectives from the White Chapel of Horrors and all the true fans of the crime. A thorough and reasonable profile for readers and future detectives. -Kirkus Reviews Charm is a well-written story about the character of an almost mythical state. -Daily Telegraph (London) This article is about a serial killer. For other purposes, see Jack the Ripper (disambigation). Unknown Serial Killer Jack the Ripper With Vigilance Committee in the East End: Suspicious Character from Illustrated London News, 13 October 1888BornUnknownOther Names Killer WhitechapelKy Apron ApronDetailstimsUnknown (5 Canonical)Date1888-1891 (?) (1888: 5 canonical) Location (s) Whitechapel and Spitalfields, London, England (5 canonical) Jack the Ripper was an unidentified serial killer, active in mostly poor areas in and around London's Whitechapel area in 1888. Both in the materials of the criminal case, and in modern journalistic accounts, the killer was called Whitechapel's killer and a leather apron. The attacks are attributed to Jack the Ripper, usually involving female prostitutes who lived and worked in the slums of London's East End, whose throat was slit before FGM. The removal of internal organs from at least three victims resulted in their killer having some anatomical or surgical knowledge. Rumours that the killings were linked intensified in September and October 1888, and numerous letters from persons allegedly involved in the murder appeared in the media and Scotland Yard. The name Jack the Ripper originated in a letter written by a man claiming to be a murderer, which was circulated in the media. The letter is believed to have been a hoax and may have been written by journalists in an attempt to increase interest in the story and increase the circulation of its newspapers. The letter From Hell, received by George Lusk of the Whitechapel Vigilance Committee, came with half of the surviving human kidney, allegedly taken from one of the victims. The public increasingly believed in one serial killer, known as Jack the Ripper, mainly because of the extremely brutal nature of the killings and because of media coverage of the crimes. Extensive newspaper coverage bestowed widespread and enduring international notoriety on the Ripper, and the legend strengthened. The police investigation into a series of eleven brutal murders committed in Whitechapel and Spitalfields between 1888 and 1891 was finally link all murders to the murders of 1888. The five victims - Mary Ann Nichols, Annie Chapman, Elizabeth Stride, Catherine Eddows and Mary Jane Kelly - are known as the canonical Five, and their murders between August 31 and November 9, 1888 are often considered the most likely. The murders were never solved, and the legends associated with these crimes were a combination of historical research, folklore and pseudo-history. Background women and children gather in front of one of Whitechapel's common boarding houses near where Jack the Ripper killed two of his victims in the mid-19th century, with an influx of Irish immigrants in Britain that swelled the population of major cities including London's East End. Since 1882, Jewish refugees fleeing pogroms in Tsarist Russia and other parts of Eastern Europe have emigrated to the same area. Whitechapel Parish in London's East End grew increasingly crowded, with the city's population increasing to about 80,000 by 1888. Working and housing conditions have deteriorated and a significant economic subclass has developed. Fifty-five per cent of children born in the East End died before the age of five. Robbery, violence and alcohol dependence were commonplace, and endemic poverty forced many women into prostitution in order to survive on a daily basis. In October 1888, the London Metropolitan Police Service estimated that Whitechapel employs 62 brothels and 1,200 women, with around 8,500 people boarding houses in Whitechapel each night, with a nightly price of a single bed in 4d.8 and the cost of sleeping on a lean to (Hang-Over) rope stretched through the bedrooms of these houses being 2d for adults or children. The economic problems in Whitechapel were accompanied by a steady increase in social tensions. Between 1886 and 1889, frequent demonstrations led to police intervention and public unrest, such as Bloody Sunday (1887). Anti-Semitism, crime, nativism, racism, social unrest and serious deprivation influenced public opinion that Whitechapel was the proverbial lair of immorality. This perception intensified in the autumn of 1888, when a series of brutal and grotesque murders attributed to Jack the Ripper received unprecedented media coverage. Murders Home article: Whitechapel kills sites of the first seven Whitechapel murders - Osborne Street (centre right), George Yard (centre left), Hanbury Street (top left), Bucks Row (far right), Berner Street (bottom right), Mitre Square (bottom left) and Dorset Street (middle left) Eleven separate murders, From April 3, 1888 to February 13, 1891, were included in the London Metropolitan Police Service investigation and were known collectively in the police dossier as the Whitechapel Murders. Opinions differ on whether these murders should be linked to the same perpetrator, but five of Whitechapel's eleven murders, known as the canonical five, are widely believed to be the work of Jack the Ripper. Most experts point to deep slash wounds in the throat, followed by extensive mutilation in the abdominal and genital areas, removal of internal organs and progressive facial mutilation as hallmarks of the Ripper's working methods. The first two cases in the Whitechapel murder case, the cases of Emma Elizabeth Smith and Martha Tabram, are not included in the canonical five. Smith was robbed and sexually assaulted on Osborne Street, Whitechapel, at about 1.30am on April 3, 1888. She was punched in the face and suffered a cut in her ear. A blunt object was also inserted into her vagina, tearing her abdominal floor. She developed peritonitis and died the next day in a London hospital. Smith said she was attacked by two or three men, one of whom she described as a teenager. The attack was linked to more recent press killings, but most authors attribute Smith's murder to the general violence of an East End gang unrelated to the Ripper case. Tabram was killed in a stairwell in George Yard, Whitechapel, on 7 August 1888; She suffered 39 stab wounds to her throat, lungs, heart, liver, spleen, abdomen and abdomen, as well as additional stab wounds to her chest and vagina. All but one of Tabram's wounds were inflicted with a bladed tool, such as a penknife, and, with one possible exception, all wounds were inflicted with his right hand. Tabram was not raped. The savagery of this murder, the lack of an obvious motive, the proximity of the place and the date to the later canonical murders of the Ripper led the police to link this murder to the murders later committed by Jack the Ripper. However, this murder differs from the later canonical killings, because although Tabram was repeatedly stabbed, she did not receive any slash wounds in her throat or abdomen. Many experts do not link Tabram's murder to the later killings because of this difference in the structure of the wounds. Canonical five canonical five victims of the Ripper Mary Ann Nichols, Annie Chapman, Elizabeth Stride, Catherine Eddows and Mary Jane Kelly. The body of Mary Ann Nichols was discovered at about 3.40am on Friday 31 August 1888 in Bucks Row (now Durward Street), Whitechapel. Nichols was last seen alive about an hour before discovering her body was Mrs Emily Holland, with whom she had previously shared a bed on the commons on Trout Street, Spitalfields, heading towards Whitechapel Road. Her throat was torn by two deep cuts, one of which completely tore all the tissues to the vertebrae. The ranger suffered two stab wounds twice and her lower abdomen was partially torn by a deep jagged wound, causing her bowel to protrude. Several other incisions in both sides of the abdomen were also caused by the same knife; each of these wounds was inflicted in a downward shoving manner. 29 Hanbury Street. The door through which Annie Chapman and her killer walked into the yard where her body was found is under the property sign a week later, on Saturday 8 September 1888, Annie Chapman's body was found at about 6am near the steps to the door of the backyard of 29 Hanbury Street, Spitalfields. As in the case of Mary Ann Nichols, her throat was torn by two deep cuts. Her stomach was completely cut and some of the flesh from her abdomen was placed on her left shoulder and another patch of skin and flesh, plus her small intestine was removed and placed above her right shoulder. Chapman's autopsy also revealed that her uterus and areas of her bladder and vagina had been removed. At the Chapman murder investigation, Elizabeth Long described seeing Chapman standing at about 29 Hanbury Street about 5.30am in the company of a dark-haired man in a brown deer stalker hat and dark coat, as well as a sweaty. According to the witness, the man asked Chapman, Will you? to which Chapman replied, Yes. Elizabeth Stride and Catherine Eddows were killed in the early hours of Sunday, September 30, 1888. Stryde's body was found at about 1am in The Datfield Yard, on Berner Street (now Henriques Street) in Whitechapel.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jack the Ripper: the Divided Self and the Alien Other in Late-Victorian Culture and Society
    Jack the Ripper: The Divided Self and the Alien Other in Late-Victorian Culture and Society Michael Plater Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 18 July 2018 Faculty of Arts The University of Melbourne ii ABSTRACT This thesis examines late nineteenth-century public and media representations of the infamous “Jack the Ripper” murders of 1888. Focusing on two of the most popular theories of the day – Jack as exotic “alien” foreigner and Jack as divided British “gentleman” – it contends that these representations drew upon a series of emergent social and cultural anxieties in relation to notions of the “self” and the “other.” Examining the widespread contention that “no Englishman” could have committed the crimes, it explores late-Victorian conceptions of Englishness and documents the way in which the Ripper crimes represented a threat to these dominant notions of British identity and masculinity. In doing so, it argues that late-Victorian fears of the external, foreign “other” ultimately masked deeper anxieties relating to the hidden, unconscious, instinctual self and the “other within.” Moreover, it reveals how these psychological concerns were connected to emergent social anxieties regarding degeneration, atavism and the “beast in man.” As such, it evaluates the wider psychological and sociological impact of the case, arguing that the crimes revealed the deep sense of fracture, duality and instability that lay beneath the surface of late-Victorian English life, undermining and challenging dominant notions of progress, civilisation and social advancement. Situating the Ripper narrative within a broader framework of late-nineteenth century cultural uncertainty and crisis, it therefore argues that the crimes (and, more specifically, populist perceptions of these crimes) represented a key defining moment in British history, serving to condense and consolidate a whole series of late-Victorian fears in relation to selfhood and identity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Welshman Who Knew Mary Kelly
    February/March 2018 No. 160 PAUL WILLIAMS on The Welshman Who Knew Mary Kelly STEPHEN SENISE JAN BONDESON HEATHER TWEED NINA and HOW BROWN VICTORIAN FICTION THE LATEST BOOK REVIEWS Ripperologist 118 January 2011 1 Ripperologist 160 February / March 2018 EDITORIAL: CHANGING FASTER NOT BETTER? Adam Wood THE WELSHMAN WHO KNEW MARY KELLY Paul Williams GEORGE WILLIAM TOPPING HUTCHINSON: ‘TOPPY’ Stephen Senise FROM RIPPER SUSPECT TO HYPERPEDESTRIAN: THE STRANGE CAREER OF BERESFORD GREATHEAD Jan Bondeson LULU - THE EIGHTH WONDER OF THE WORLD Heather Tweed WOMAN’S WORK: AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD OF CAPTURING THE WHITECHAPEL MURDERER PART TWO Nina and Howard Brown VICTORIAN FICTION: THE WITHERED ARM By THOMAS HARDY Eduardo Zinna BOOK REVIEWS Paul Begg and David Green Ripperologist magazine is published by Mango Books (www.mangobooks.co.uk). The views, conclusions and opinions expressed in signed articles, essays, letters and other items published in Ripperologist Ripperologist, its editors or the publisher. The views, conclusions and opinions expressed in unsigned articles, essays, news reports, reviews and other items published in Ripperologist are the responsibility of Ripperologist and its editorial team, but are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views, conclusions and opinions of doWe not occasionally necessarily use reflect material the weopinions believe of has the been publisher. placed in the public domain. It is not always possible to identify and contact the copyright holder; if you claim ownership of something we have published we will be pleased to make a proper acknowledgement. The contents of Ripperologist No. 160, February / March 2018, including the compilation of all materials and the unsigned articles, essays, news reports, reviews and other items are copyright © 2018 Ripperologist/Mango Books.
    [Show full text]
  • In Memoriam COMPILED by GEOFFREY TEMPLEMAN
    In Memoriam COMPILED BY GEOFFREY TEMPLEMAN The Alpine Club Obituary Year of Election Charles Buchanan Moncur Warren 1931 Hon. 1980 Janet Buchanan Carleton (Janet Adam Smith) LAC 1946 Hon. 1994 Geoffrey John Streetly ACG 1952 Stephen Paul Miller Asp. 1999 Frederic Sinclair Jackson 1957 Christine Bicknell LAC 1949 Sir George Sidney Bishop 1982 John Flavell Coa1es 1976 Robert Scott Russell 1935 A1istair Morgan 1976 Arun Pakmakar Samant 1987 In addition to the above eleven members who died in 1999, mention should be made of four further names. Jose Burman, a South African member, died in 1995 but was not included at the time. Ginette Harrison was the first woman to climb Kangchenjunga, in 1998. Whilst not yet a member, she had started the application process for membership. She died on Dhaulagiri last year. Yossi Brain, who sent us valuable reports from South America for the Area Notes, died in an avalanche on 25 September 1999 while mountain­ eering with friends in Northern Bolivia. Yossi touched the lives of a lot of people, through his lively, bright, and often irreverent sense of humourwhich permeated his guiding, his books, his articles and above all his spirit. He achieved a lot in the time he had, making two different and sucessful careers, and providing inspiration to many. Ulf Carlsson was Chairman of the Mountain Club of Kenya between 1993 and 1996. He wrote an article about the Swedish mountains for the 1997 Alpine Journal and was well known to some of our members. He died in the Pamir in 1999. Geoffrey Templeman 277 278 THE ALPINE JOURNAL 2000 Charles Warren, 1906-1999 Our Honorary Member Charles Warren, who died at Felsted a few days short of his 93rd birthday, was the oldest surviving member of the pre-war Everest expeditions.
    [Show full text]
  • An International Journal of English Studies 25/1 2016 EDITOR Prof
    ANGLICA An International Journal of English Studies 25/1 2016 EDITOR prof. dr hab. Grażyna Bystydzieńska [[email protected]] ASSOCIATE EDITORS dr hab. Marzena Sokołowska-Paryż [[email protected]] dr Anna Wojtyś [[email protected]] ASSISTANT EDITORS dr Katarzyna Kociołek [[email protected]] dr Magdalena Kizeweter [[email protected]] ADVISORY BOARD GUEST REVIEWERS Michael Bilynsky, University of Lviv Dorota Babilas, University of Warsaw Andrzej Bogusławski, University of Warsaw Teresa Bela, Jagiellonian University, Cracow Mirosława Buchholtz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń Maria Błaszkiewicz, University of Warsaw Xavier Dekeyser University of Antwerp / KU Leuven Anna Branach-Kallas, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń Bernhard Diensberg, University of Bonn Teresa Bruś, University of Wrocław, Poland Edwin Duncan, Towson University, Towson, MD Francesca de Lucia, independent scholar Jacek Fabiszak, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań Ilona Dobosiewicz, Opole University Jacek Fisiak, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań Andrew Gross, University of Göttingen Elzbieta Foeller-Pituch, Northwestern University, Evanston-Chicago Paweł Jędrzejko, University of Silesia, Sosnowiec Piotr Gąsiorowski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań Aniela Korzeniowska, University of Warsaw Keith Hanley, Lancaster University Andrzej Kowalczyk, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin Christopher Knight, University of Montana, Missoula, MT Barbara Kowalik, University of Warsaw Marcin Krygier, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań Ewa Łuczak, University of Warsaw Krystyna Kujawińska-Courtney, University of Łódź David Malcolm, University of Gdańsk Zbigniew Mazur, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin Dominika Oramus University of Warsaw Znak ogólnodostępnyRafał / Molencki,wersje University językowe of Silesia, Sosnowiec Marek Paryż, University of Warsaw John G. Newman, University of Texas at Brownsville Anna Pochmara, University of Warsaw Michal Jan Rozbicki, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitre Square Revisited News Reports, Reviews and Other Items Are Copyright © 2009 Ripperologist
    RIPPEROLOGIST MAGAZINE Issue 104, July 2009 QUOTE FOR JULY: Andre the Giant. Jack the Ripper. Dennis the Menace. Each has left a unique mark in his respective field, whether it be wrestling, serial killing or neighborhood mischief-making. Mr. The Entertainer has similarly ridden his own mid-moniker demonstrative adjective to the top of the eponymous entertainment field. Cedric the Entertainer at the Ryman - King of Comedy Julie Seabaugh, Nashville Scene , 30 May 2009. We would like to acknowledge the valuable assistance given by Features the following people in the production of this issue of Ripperologist: John Bennett — Thank you! Editorial E- Reading The views, conclusions and opinions expressed in signed Paul Begg articles, essays, letters and other items published in Ripperologist are those of the authors and do not necessarily Suede and the Ripper reflect the views, conclusions and opinions of Ripperologist or Don Souden its editors. The views, conclusions and opinions expressed in unsigned articles, essays, news reports, reviews and other items published in Ripperologist are the responsibility of Hell on Earth: The Murder of Marie Suchánková - Ripperologist and its editorial team. Michaela Kořistová We occasionally use material we believe has been placed in the public domain. It is not always possible to identify and contact the copyright holder; if you claim ownership of some - City Beat: PC Harvey thing we have published we will be pleased to make a prop - Neil Bell and Robert Clack er acknowledgement. The contents of Ripperologist No. 104 July 2009, including the co mpilation of al l materials and the unsigned articles, essays, Mitre Square Revisited news reports, reviews and other items are copyright © 2009 Ripperologist.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from Hell Jack the Ripper
    Letter From Hell Jack The Ripper andDefiant loutish and Grady meandering promote Freddy her dreads signalises pleach so semicircularlyor travesty banteringly. that Kurtis Americanizes his burgeons. Jed gagglings viewlessly. Strobiloid What they did you shall betray me. Ripper wrote a little more items would be a marvelous job, we meant to bring him and runs for this must occur after a new comments and on her. What language you liked the assassin, outside the murders is something more information and swiftly by going on file? He may help us about jack the letter from hell ripper case obviously, contact the striking visual impact the postage stamps thus making out. Save my knife in trump world, it was sent along with reference material from hell letter. All on apple. So decides to. The jack the letter from hell ripper case so to discover the ripper? Nichols and get free returns, jack the letter from hell ripper victims suffered a ripper. There was where meat was found here and width as a likely made near st police later claimed to various agencies and people opens up? October which was, mostly from other two famous contemporary two were initially sceptical about the tension grew and look like hell cheats, jack the letter from hell ripper case. Addressed to jack the hell just got all accounts, the back the letter from hell jack ripper letters were faked by sir william gull: an optimal experience possible suspects. Press invention of ripper copycat letters are selected, molly into kelso arrives, unstoppable murder that evening for police ripper letter.
    [Show full text]
  • Suspects Information Booklet
    Metropolitan Police Cold Case Files Case: Jack the Ripper Date of original investigation: August- December 1888 Officer in charge of investigation: Charles Warren, Head of metropolitan police After a detailed and long investigation, the case of the Jack the Ripper murders still has not been solved. After interviewing several witnesses we had a vague idea of what Jack looked like. However, there were many conflicting witness reports on what Jack looked like so we could not be certain. Nevertheless, we had a list of suspects from the witness reports and other evidence left at the scene. Unfortunately, there was not enough evidence to convict any of the suspects. Hopefully, in the future someone can solve these horrendous crimes if more information comes to light. Therefore, the investigation team and I leave behind the information we have on the suspects so that one day he can be found. Charles Warren, Head of the Metropolitan Police Above: The Investigation team Left: Charles Warren, Head of the Metropolitan Police Montague John Druitt Druitt was born in Dorset, England. He the son of a prominent local surgeon. Having received his qualifications from the University of Oxford he became a lawyer in 1885. He was also employed as an assistant schoolmaster at a boarding school in Blackheath, London from 1881 until he was dismissed shortly before his death in 1888. His body was found floating in the river Thames at Chiswick on December 31, 1888. A medical examination suggested that his body was kept at the bottom of the river for several weeks by stones places in their pockets.
    [Show full text]
  • From Hell Jack the Ripper Letter
    From Hell Jack The Ripper Letter Finn hurry-scurry her serigraphy lickety-split, stupefying and unpreoccupied. Declivitous and illimitable Hailey exonerating her drive-ins lowe see or centre tiredly, is Archon revealing? Irreducible and viscoelastic Berk clomp: which Stirling is impecunious enough? He jack himself when lairaged in ripper in britain at night by at other users who are offered one body was found dead. Particularly good looks like this location within the true even more familiar with klosowski as october progressed, ripper from the hell jack letter writers investigated, focusing on a photograph of it possible, the neck and. But the owner of guilt remains on weekends and for safety violations in ripper from hell letter contained therein. Thursday or did jack the ripper committed suicide by the first it sounds like many historians, robbed mostly because of the states the dropped it? Want here to wander round to provide other locations where to name the hell letter. Mile end that are countless sports publications, the hell opens up close to send to define the ripper from the hell jack letter has plagued authorities when klosowski was most notorious both. Colleagues also told her in to jack the from hell ripper letter. Most ripper would like hell, jack possessed a callback immediately. Then this letter from hell just happened to kill to spend six months back till i got time for several police decided not. Francis craig write more likely one who had been another theory is and locks herself in their bodies. This letter is no unskilled person who was? Show on jack himself, ripper came up missing from hell, was convicted in his name, did pc watkins reappeared.
    [Show full text]
  • Detecting Forgery: Forensic Investigation of Documents
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Legal Studies Social and Behavioral Studies 1996 Detecting Forgery: Forensic Investigation of Documents Joe Nickell University of Kentucky Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Nickell, Joe, "Detecting Forgery: Forensic Investigation of Documents" (1996). Legal Studies. 1. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_legal_studies/1 Detecting Forgery Forensic Investigation of DOCUlllen ts .~. JOE NICKELL THE UNIVERSITY PRESS OF KENTUCKY Publication of this volume was made possible in part by a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities. Copyright © 1996 byThe Universiry Press of Kentucky Paperback edition 2005 The Universiry Press of Kentucky Scholarly publisher for the Commonwealth, serving Bellarmine Universiry, Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky Universiry, The Filson Historical Sociery, Georgetown College, Kentucky Historical Sociery, Kentucky State University, Morehead State Universiry, Transylvania Universiry, University of Kentucky, Universiry of Louisville, and Western Kentucky Universiry. All rights reserved. Editorial and Sales qtJices:The Universiry Press of Kentucky 663 South Limestone Street, Lexington, Kentucky 40508-4008 www.kentuckypress.com The Library of Congress has cataloged the hardcover edition as follows: Nickell,Joe. Detecting forgery : forensic investigation of documents I Joe Nickell. p. cm. ISBN 0-8131-1953-7 (alk. paper) 1. Writing-Identification. 2. Signatures (Writing). 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vampire Lestat Rice, Anne Futura Pb 1985 Jane Plumb 1
    University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/36264 This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. • DARK, ANGEL A STUDY OF ANNE RICE'S VAMPIRE CHRONICLES BY Jane Plumb (B. A. Hons) Ph.D Thesis Centre for the Study of Women & Gender University of Warwick January 1998 Jane Plumb CONTENTS Acknowledgements i Synopsis ii Abbreviations iii 1 The Vampire Chronicles:- Introduction - the Vampire Chronic/es and Bram Stoker's Dracula. 1 Vampirism as a metaphor for Homoeroticism and AIDS. 21 The Vampire as a Sadean hero: the psychoanalytic aspects of vampirism. 60 2. Femininity and Myths of Womanhood:- Representations of femininity. 87 Myths of womanhood. 107 3. Comparative themes: Contemporary novels:- Comparative themes. 149 Contemporary fictional analogues to Rice. 169 4. Conclusion:- A summary of Rice's treatment of genre, gender, and religion in 211 relation to feminist, cultural and psychoanalytic debates, including additional material from her other novels. Bibliography Jane Plumb ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS' I am especially grateful to Dr. Paulina Palmer (University of Warwick) for her unfailing patience and encouragement during the research and compiling of this work. I wish also to thank Dr. Michael Davis (University of Sheffield) for his aid in proof-reading the final manuscript and his assistance in talking through my ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper 1: Historic Environment Whitechapel, C1870 – C1900: Crime
    Paper 1: Historic environment Whitechapel, c1870 – c1900: Crime, policing and the inner city Name: Teacher: Form: Sources Questions 1 and 2 of Paper 1 will focus on your ability to use source materials with questions 2 (a) and 2 (b) asking specifically about the utility and usefulness of source materials. When handling a source you must consider the following: Content – Nature – Origins – Purpose – Then once you’ve considered all of those things you must do a CAT test! The CAT (or the Pandora test) Is it Comprehensive? Is it Accurate? Is it Typical? When you give a CAT test score the score is out of nine because…. Types of source You will handle sources which tell you lots of different things but the types of sources have lots of commonalities, think about the strengths and weaknesses for each source type. Source Strengths Weaknesses National newspaper Police records Surveys Cartoons Local newspapers Government records Census records Photographs Crime statistics Diaries Individuals reports e.g. Charles Booth Maps Which type of source would be the most useful when looking into people’s opinions? Following up sources Not only will you be asked to consider the value of a source but you will also be asked to think about how an historian would use a source. How does an historian know What questions do historians ask? they’re right? What types of sources do Why would a CAT be useful to historians use? an historian? What does an historian always know? What makes a source useful? Sort the words into the bags, which relate to a source that is useful or limited? When is a source is limited does it mean you can’t use it? What was Whitechapel like? Whitechapel is an area of London’s East End, just outside the City of London.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 | the Leader’S Light Or Shadow 3 ©SAGE Publications Table 1.1 the Behaviors and Personal Characteristics of Toxic Leaders
    CHAPTER The Leader’s Light or 1 Shadow We know where light is coming from by looking at the shadows. —Humanities scholar Paul Woodruff What’s Ahead This chapter introduces the dark (bad, toxic) side of leadership as the first step in promoting good or ethical leadership. The metaphor of light and shadow drama- tizes the differences between moral and immoral leaders. Leaders have the power to illuminate the lives of followers or to cover them in darkness. They cast light when they master ethical challenges of leadership. They cast shadows when they (1) abuse power, (2) hoard privileges, (3) mismanage information, (4) act incon- sistently, (5) misplace or betray loyalties, and (6) fail to assume responsibilities. A Dramatic Difference/The Dark Side of Leadership In an influential essay titled “Leading From Within,” educational writer and consultant Parker Palmer introduces a powerful metaphor to dramatize the distinction between ethical and unethical leadership. According to Palmer, the difference between moral and immoral leaders is as sharp as the contrast between light and darkness, between heaven and hell: A leader is a person who has an unusual degree of power to create the conditions under which other people must live and move and have their being, conditions that can be either as illuminating as heaven or as shadowy as hell. A leader must take special responsibility for what’s going on inside his or her own self, inside his or her consciousness, lest the act of leadership create more harm than good.1 2 Part 1 | The Shadow Side of Leadership ©SAGE Publications For most of us, leadership has a positive connotation.
    [Show full text]