DOCSLIB.ORG

Self-Harm, Suicide and Risk: Helping People Who Self-Harm

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Self-Harm, Suicide and Risk: Helping People Who Self-Harm Royal College of Psychiatrists Self-harm, suicide and risk: helping people who self-harm Self-harm, suicide and risk: helping people who self-harm Final report of a working group College Report CR158 © 2010 Royal College of Psychiatrists Cover photograph: © 2010 iStockphoto/Natalya Filimonova College Reports have been approved by a meeting of the Central Policy Coordination Committee and constitute College policy until they are revised or withdrawn. For full details of reports available and how to obtain them, contact the Book Sales Assistant at the Royal College of Psychiatrists, 17 Belgrave Square, London SW1X 8PG (tel. 020 7235 2351, fax 020 7245 1231). Royal College of Psychiatrists The Royal College of Psychiatrists is a charity registered in England and Wales (228636) and in Scotland (SC038369). College Report CR158 Self-harm, suicide and risk: helping people who self-harm Final report of a working group College Report CR158 June 2010 Royal College of Psychiatrists London Approved by Central Policy Coordination Committee: April 2010 Due for review: 2015 DISCLAIMER This guidance (as updated from time to time) is for use by members of the Royal College of Psychiatrists. It sets out guidance, principles and specific recommendations that, in the view of the College, should be followed by members. Nonetheless, members remain responsible for regulating their own conduct in relation to the subject matter of the guidance. Accordingly, to the extent permitted by applicable law, the College excludes all liability of any kind arising as a consequence, directly or indirectly, of the member either following or failing to follow the guidance. Contents Working Group 4 Executive summary 5 Part I: Understanding the problems and the people 1 Background 17 2 What is self-harm? 21 3 Self-harm and mental or physical disorders 25 4 Wider social concerns 29 5 Interventions 37 PART II: The public health agenda 6 The cost of self-harm 45 7 Strategies for the prevention of self-harm and suicide 47 8 A public health approach specifically to address self-harm 50 9 The role of the third sector 55 10 Research 58 Part III: Working with individual people 11 Introduction 63 12 Overarching themes 64 13 What do service users and carers want from services? 68 14 The College Members’ survey: skills and services 72 needed 15 Third-sector providers 95 16 Conclusions 96 Bibliography and references 97 Appendix I: Online survey of College Members 107 Appendix II: People who gave evidence to the Working Group 133 Appendix III: Pathways to suicide behaviour 135 Royal College of Psychiatrists 3 Working Group CHAIR John, Lord Alderdice Consultant Psychiatrist in Psychotherapy, Northern Ireland HONORARY SECRETARY Dr John Morgan Consultant Psychiatrist, Leeds MEMBERS Ms Janey Antoniou Service User Dr Jim Bolton Consultant Psychiatrist, South West London and St George’s Dr Tom Brown Consultant Psychiatrist, former Chair of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, Scotland Division Dr Cathal Cassidy Chair of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, Northern Ireland Division Dr Rowena Daw Head of Policy, Royal College of Psychiatrists Dr Mick Dennis Consultant in Liaison Psychiatry for Older People, Reader in Psychiatry, Swansea Dr Kimmett Edgar Head of Research, Prison Reform Trust Mr Joe Ferns Director of Policy, Research and Development, Samaritans Mr Adrian Fisher Service User Professor Keith Hawton Oxford University Centre for Suicide Research Ms Veronica Kamerling Carer Professor Rory O’Connor British Psychological Society Ms Lucy Palmer Programme Manager, Royal College of Psychiatrists, College Research and Training Unit Dr Gemma Trainor Psychiatric Nurse and Child and Adolescent Mental Health Expert Ms Melba Wilson* National Programme Lead, Mental Health Equalities, National Mental Health Development Unit *Ms Sue Waterhouse, Deputy National Programme Lead, Mental Health Equalities, National Mental Health Development Unit was a substitute for Ms Melba Wilson at most meetings and is an expert in her own right. 4 http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk Executive summary Self-harm is poorly understood in society even among those who in their working lives as school teachers, pastors, social workers, housing officers, police, prison officers and even nurses and doctors encounter people who harm themselves. People who harm themselves are subject to stigma and hostility. In contrast to the trends in completed suicide, the incidence of self- harm has continued to rise in the UK over the past 20 years and, for young people at least, is said to be among the highest in Europe. This high level of self-harm among different age and social groups is a worrying feature of our society. The focus of this report is to enquire into and report on why people harm and kill themselves and to consider the role (including the limits of the role) that psychiatrists and other mental healthcare professionals play in their care and treatment. The experiences and views of people who harm themselves as well as those of their carers, health professionals and third-sector workers are central to this enquiry. As there is much policy and guidance on self-harm and suicide prevention, the report does not attempt to retrace this same ground but rather examines the evidence of practice on the ground, including the implementation of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines on self-harm (National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2004). This report is the second in the Royal College of Psychiatrists’ programme of work on the broad issue of risk. The College report Rethinking Risk to Others was published in July 2008 (Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2008a) and a new Working Group was set up under the chairmanship of John, Lord Alderdice, to examine risk, self-harm and suicide. This clinical issue is an integral part of the role of the psychiatrist in ensuring the good care and treatment of patients. Our central theme is that the needs, care, well-being and individual human dilemma of the person who harms themselves should be at the heart of what we as clinicians do. Public health policy has a vital role to play and psychiatrists must be involved and not leave these crucial political and managerial decisions to those who are not professionally equipped to appreciate the complexities of self-harm and suicide. But we must never forget that we are not just dealing with social phenomena but with people who are often at, and beyond the limit of what they can emotionally endure. Their aggressive acts towards themselves can be difficult to understand and frustrating to address, but this is precisely why psychiatrists need to be involved to bring clarity to the differing causes for the self-destructive ways in which people act and to assist in managing the problems for the people concerned, including family, friends and professional carers, who sometimes find themselves at the end of their tether in the face of such puzzling and destructive behaviour. Royal College of Psychiatrists 5 College Report CR158 The report is divided into three parts. In Part I, we give some background information on self-harm in the UK and on understanding why people harm themselves. In Part II, we examine some of the public health policy issues, and in Part III we concentrate on the practice of healthcare professionals and others who work with people who have harmed themselves and are at risk of harming themselves, as evidenced particularly by a survey and consultations with College Members and Faculties. The important role of the third sector is also examined. PART I: UN D ERSTAN D ING THE P ROBLEMS AN D THE P EO P LE For the purpose of this report we define self-harm as an intentional act of self-poisoning or self-injury irrespective of the type of motivation or degree of suicidal intent. Thus it includes suicide attempts as well as acts where little or no suicidal intent is involved (e.g. where people harm themselves to reduce internal tension, distract themselves from intolerable situations, as a form of interpersonal communication of distress or other difficult feelings, or to punish themselves.) An act of self-harm is a not necessarily an attempt or even indicator of suicide, indeed it can sometimes be a bizarre form of self-preservation. Nevertheless it covers a wide spectrum of behaviour, with harmful physical effects, and a person who repeatedly self-harms is at a higher risk of suicide. Self-harm is a behaviour, a manifestation of emotional distress. It is an indication that something is wrong rather than a primary disorder. For each person the contributing circumstances are individual. However, commonly they include difficult personal circumstances, past trauma (including abuse, neglect or loss), or social or economic deprivation together with some level of mental disorder. A person’s self–harming behaviour may often be associated with the misuse of drugs or alcohol. The rate of self-harm is higher among women and girls than among men and boys, although completed suicide is more prevalent among men and boys. People of all ages and from all social and cultural backgrounds may harm themselves but some groups are especially vulnerable because of life experiences, personal or social circumstances, physical factors or a combination of these elements. There is a higher incidence of self-harm among prisoners, asylum seekers, veterans from the armed forces, people bereaved by suicide, some cultural minority groups and people from sexual minorities. The assessment and management of a person who has harmed themselves therefore requires a biopsychosocial approach which assesses their problems, needs and in so far as is possible understands the risks of further harm to this individual and provides a person-centred management plan. Helping this person address their current and ongoing problems with whatever help can be made available to them in their context should be the key principle informing the care and treatment of the individual.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Deinstitutionalization: Its Impact on Community Mental Health Centers and the Seriously Mentally Ill Stephen P
    Page 40 Deinstitutionalization: Its Impact on Community Mental Health Centers and the Seriously Mentally Ill Stephen P. Kliewer Melissa McNally Robyn L. Trippany Walden University Abstract Deinstitutionalization has had a significant impact on the mental health system, including the client, the agency, and the counselor. For clients with serious mental illness, learning to live in a community setting poses challenges that are often difficult to overcome. Community mental health agencies must respond to these specific needs, thus requiring a shift in how services are delivered and how mental health counselors need to be trained. The focus of this article is to explore the dynamics and challenges specific to deinstitution- alization, discuss implications for counselors, and identify solutions to respond to the identified challenges and resulting needs. State run psychiatric hospitals have traditionally been the primary component in the treatment of people with severe and persistent mental illness. For many years, individuals with severe mental illness (SMI) were kept out of the community setting. This isolation occurred for many reasons: a) the attitude of the public about people with mental illness, b) a belief that the mentally ill could only be helped in such settings, and c) a lack of resources at the community level (Patrick, Smith, Schleifer, Morris & McClennon, 2006). However, the institutional approach was not without its problems. A primary problem was the absence of hope and expecta- tion that patients would recover (Patrick, et al., 2006). In short, institutions seemed to become warehouses where mentally ill were kept for long periods of time with little expectation of improvement.
    [Show full text]
  • Standpoints on Psychiatric Deinstitutionalization Alix Rule Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degre
    Standpoints on Psychiatric Deinstitutionalization Alix Rule Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2018 © 2018 Alix Rule All rights reserved ABSTRACT Standpoints on Psychiatric Deinstitutionalization Alix Rule Between 1955 and 1985 the United States reduced the population confined in its public mental hospitals from around 600,000 to less than 110,000. This dissertation provides a novel analysis of the movement that advocated for psychiatric deinstitutionalization. To do so, it reconstructs the unfolding setting of the movement’s activity historically, at a number of levels: namely, (1) the growth of private markets in the care of mental illness and the role of federal welfare policy; (2) the contested role of states as actors in driving the process by which these developments effected changes in the mental health system; and (3) the context of relevant events visible to contemporaries. Methods of computational text analysis help to reconstruct this social context, and thus to identify the closure of key opportunities for movement action. In so doing, the dissertation introduces an original method for compiling textual corpora, based on a word-embedding model of ledes published by The New York Times from 1945 to the present. The approach enables researchers to achieve distinct, but equally consistent, actor-oriented descriptions of the social world spanning long periods of time, the forms of which are illustrated here. Substantively, I find that by the early 1970s, the mental health system had disappeared from public view as a part of the field of general medicine — and with it a target around which the existing movement on behalf of the mentally ill might have effectively reorganized itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading List
    Psychiatric Epidemiology Dr. William W. Eaton Textbook Tsuang MT & Tohen M. Textbook in Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2nd ed. New York, Wiley-Liss, 2002. Available online at: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/booktoc/104527540 Session 1 Topic: Introduction, Nosology, and History of Psychiatric Epidemiology Assigned Readings: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). 4th ed. Washington, DC, APA Introduction, XV-XXV. Use of the manual, 1-11. Multiaxial Assessment, 25-35. Available online at: http://online.statref.com/TOC.aspx?grpalias=JHU&FxId=37 Recommended Additional Readings: o Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). 4th ed. Washington, DC, APA. o Choose any other single chapter on mental disorders. Session 2 Topic: Measurement of Psychopathology in Populations Assigned Readings: Tsuang, M.T.& Cohen, M. (2002). Textbook in Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2nd ed. Wiley- Liss. Ch12. Murphy JM. Symptom scales and diagnostic schedules in adult psychiatry. 273-332. Recommended Additional Readings: Choose one Tsuang, M.T.& Cohen, M. (2002). Textbook in Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2nd ed. Wiley- Liss. o Ch 9. Eaton, WW. Studying the Natural History of Psychopathology. 215-238. o Ch 11. Robins, LN. Birth and development of psychiatric interviews. 257-272. o Ch 14. Kessler RC and Walters E. The National Comorbidity Survey. 343-362. Session 3 Topic: Epidemiology of Anxiety Disorders Assigned Readings: Tsuang, M.T.& Cohen, M. (2002). Textbook in Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2nd ed. Wiley- Liss. Ch16. Horwath E, Cohen RS, Weissman MM. Epidemiology of depressive and anxiety disorders. 389-426 Recommended Additional Readings: Choose one o Eaton, W.W. (1995) Progress in the epidemiology of anxiety disorders.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinically Useful Brain Imaging for Neuropsychiatry: How Can We Get There?
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/115097; this version posted March 9, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Clinically Useful Brain Imaging for Neuropsychiatry: How Can We Get There? Michael P. Milham1,2, R. Cameron Craddock1,2 and Arno Klein1 1Center for the Developing Brain, Child Mind Institute, New York, NY 2Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, New York, NY Corresponding Author: Michael P. Milham, MD, PhD Phyllis Green and Randolph Cowen Scholar Child Mind Institute 445 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 [email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/115097; this version posted March 9, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Abstract Despite decades of research, visions of transforming neuropsychiatry through the development of brain imaging-based ‘growth charts’ or ‘lab tests’ have remained out of reach. In recent years, there is renewed enthusiasm about the prospect of achieving clinically useful tools capable of aiding the diagnosis and management of neuropsychiatric disorders. The present work explores the basis for this enthusiasm. We assert that there is no single advance that currently has the potential to drive the field of clinical brain imaging forward.
    [Show full text]
  • (Tdcs) for Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder White Paper
    White paper Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for treatment of major depressive disorder Mode of action Brain stimulation with tDCS can be used to induce chang- In brief es in neuronal excitability in a polarity-dependent manner: positive anodal stimulus increases cortical excitability (de- • Non-invasive tDCS relieves symptoms in polarization) without triggering action potentials, whereas depressed patients by modulating cortical negative cathodal stimulus decreases excitability (hyperpo- excitability through a weak current larization)4 (Figure 1). To date, several studies have demon- strated hypoactivity of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex • tDCS can be used both as a monotherapy (DLPFC) in depressed patients.7,8 Accordingly, the antide- or as an adjunct to antidepressant pressant effects of tDCS may be due to the increased excit- medication and psychotherapy ability of the DLPFC, which further balances the left-right prefrontal activity and subsequently leads to symptom relief • Meta-analyses have found active tDCS in depressed patients.3 treatment to be significantly superior to sham tDCS in depressed patients Neurobiological studies have demonstrated that tDCS me- diates a cascade of events at a cellular and molecular level, • tDCS is well tolerated, and no serious including effects on the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors.9,10 side effects have been reported In addition to acute transient membrane potential chang- es that can last up to one hour, tDCS is associated with longer-lasting synaptic changes.11–12 Further studies eluci- dating the detailed mechanism of tDCS in therapeutic neu- romodulation are currently ongoing. Major depressive disorder (MDD) has an estimated life- time prevalence of 8–12% and is associated with signifi- cant morbidity and mortality.1 Standard treatments for Cathodal Anodal MDD include psychological therapies and antidepressant electrode (-) electrode (+) medication, which are often only moderately effective and Decreased neuronal Increased neuronal may have adverse effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Epidemiology of Psychotic Disorders
    Jonna Perälä Jonna Perälä Epidemiology of Psychotic Disorders Jonna Perälä Epidemiology of Psychotic Disorders Epidemiology of Psychotic Disorders Epidemiology of Psychotic Schizophrenia and other psychoses are among the most severe medical diseases. There are few general population surveys of psychotic disorders. Most studies have focused on schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder, while data of many other specific psychotic disorders are scarce. This study investigated the lifetime prevalence and epidemiological features of psychotic disorders in the adult Finnish general population. The lifetime preva- lence of psychotic disorders was higher than has been estimated in most recent general population studies. The most common disorder was schizophrenia. RESEARCH Psychoses were generally associated with socioeconomic disadvantage. The RESEARCH highest lifetime prevalence was found in northern and eastern parts of Finland, which should be taken into account when resources are allocated to health care. Alcohol-induced psychotic disorders were common in working aged men and associated with high mortality. Clinical features of delusional disorder were differ- ent from schizophrenia. Disorganized schizophrenia was a schizophrenia subtype associated with poor outcome. With a high lifetime prevalence exceeding 3%, psychotic disorders are a major public health concern. Publication sales www.thl.fi/bookshop 97 97 97 Telephone: +358 29 524 7190 2013 ISBN 978-952-245-825-4 Fax: +358 29 524 7450 RESEARCH 97 • 2013 Jonna Perälä Epidemiology of Psychotic
    [Show full text]
  • Psychiatric Epidemiology and Neuroscience Unite in the Pursuit of Reformulated Schizophrenia Nosologies Karyn Groth
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn UCHC Graduate School Masters Theses 2003 - University of Connecticut Health Center Graduate 2010 School 6-1-2007 Psychiatric Epidemiology and Neuroscience Unite in the Pursuit of Reformulated Schizophrenia Nosologies Karyn Groth Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/uchcgs_masters Recommended Citation Groth, Karyn, "Psychiatric Epidemiology and Neuroscience Unite in the Pursuit of Reformulated Schizophrenia Nosologies" (2007). UCHC Graduate School Masters Theses 2003 - 2010. 139. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/uchcgs_masters/139 Psychiatric Epidemiology and Neuroscience Unite in the Pursuit of Reformulated Schizophrenia Nosologies Karyn Groth B.A., Quinnipiac College, 1999 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Public Health at the University of Connecticut 2007 APPROV AL PAGE Master of Public Health Thesis Psychiatric Epidemiology and Neuroscience Unite in Pursuit of Reformulated Schizophrenia Nosology Presented by Karyn Groth, B.A. Major Advisor __----"-~.J--_~_'_ ..... i--_Jvv-....._-_ .. _&_"V_A_S._:..-______ Jonathan Covault Associate Advisor --~~~~~~~~--------------- Associate Advisor ---4~~--~-----= __~------------ n University of Connecticut 2006 11 Acknowledgements Page Thanks to Jonathan Covault for his willingness to mentor a public health student and for the time and effort involved in the process. Thanks to Howard Tennen for graciously serving as a reader and associate advisor in my time of need. Special thanks to Vince Calhoun for guiding me through the statistical theory and hands on data analysis over the past year of this project. Special thanks to Godfrey Pearlson for providing me several years of interest and education in schizophrenia and the foundation for formulating my ideas about the benefits of collaboration between epidemiology and neuroscience.
    [Show full text]
  • In Relation to Psychiatric Epidemiology
    Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.41.477.401 on 1 July 1965. Downloaded from POSTGRAD. MED. J. (1965), 41, 401 STUDIES OF SOCIAL ATTITUDES AND VALUES IN RELATION TO PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY K. RAWNSLEY, M.B., M.R.C.P., D.P.M. Professor of Psychological Medicine, Welsh National School of Medicine, (formerly member of scientific staff, M.R.C. Social Psychiatry Research Unit, Llandough, Penarth, S. Wales). FOR MANY years the annual rate of first admis- cases are defined in the community, recognised sions to psychiatric hospitals in England and by community members and by medical and Wales has shown a steady rise (Registrar social agencies, and dealt with by one means General 1964). Changes in the legal and ad- or other. Studies of this kind are very relevant ministrative arrangements for the care and treat- to the epidemiology of mental disorder since, ment of mental disorders are probably account- by the nature of such illness, the detection and able for the greater part of this rising influx. The enumeration of cases is intimately linked with Mental Treatment Act 1930 established volun- prevailing social "yardsticks" pertaining to the tary admission and enabled local authorities to acceptable bounds of "normal' behaviour and set up out-patient clinics. The development of experience and also to the categorisation of the National Health Service brought a sub- deviant behaviour as falling within the doctors' stantial enlargement of the specialist establish- province. by copyright. ment in psychiatry. More recently the Mental Health Act 1959 has abolished the special status Attitudes to the Psychiatric In-patient of psychiatric hospitals and has removed all A feature of post-war British psychiatry has formality from the admission procedure for all been the mobilisation and rehabilitation of except a minority of patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Mental Health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
    Mental Health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health A History of the Department Karen Kruse Thomas, PhD Historian of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health copyright 2013 Contents 1. Origins of Mental Hygiene at Johns Hopkins ......................................................... 1 2. Research on child development and developmental disabilities ......................... 14 3. Mental Hygiene and Behavioral Sciences in the 1960s ....................................... 22 4. Treating substance abuse ................................................................................... 27 5. Mental Hygiene in the 1980s and ’90s ................................................................ 35 6. The Department of Mental Health in the 21st Century ......................................... 44 Selected Honors and Awards ................................................................................... 53 Selected Faculty Publications of the Department of Mental Health .......................... 54 Chairs of the Department of Mental Hygiene (1961-2004) and Department of Mental Health (2004-present) Paul V. Lemkau, MD, MPH Alan D. Miller, MD, MPH 1941-74 interim 1955-57 Abraham M. Lilienfeld, MD, MPH Ernest Gruenberg, MD, DrPH interim 1974-1975 1975-81 1 Wallace Mandell, MD, MPH Sheppard G. Kellam, MD interim 1993-97 1982-93 John C. S. Breitner, MD William W. Eaton, PhD 1997-2001 interim 2001-03; 2003-2013 2 M. Daniele Fallin, PhD 2013- 3 1. Origins of Mental Hygiene at Johns death, perhaps because mental hygiene
    [Show full text]
  • What Drives Changes in Institutionalised Mental Health Care? a Qualitative Study of the Perspectives of Professional Experts
    Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (2019) 54:737–744 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1634-7 ORIGINAL PAPER What drives changes in institutionalised mental health care? A qualitative study of the perspectives of professional experts Winnie S. Chow1 · Ali Ajaz2 · Stefan Priebe1 Received: 4 July 2018 / Accepted: 17 November 2018 / Published online: 23 November 2018 © The Author(s) 2018 Abstract Background Since 1990, the provision of mental healthcare has changed substantially across Western Europe. There are fewer psychiatric hospital beds and more places in forensic psychiatric hospitals and residential facilities. However, little research has investigated the drivers behind these changes. This study explored qualitatively the perspectives of mental health professional experts on what has driven the changes in Western Europe. Methods In-depth interviews were conducted with twenty-four mental health experts in England, Germany and Italy, who as professionals had personal experiences of the changes in their country. Interviewees were asked about drivers of changes in institutionalised mental health care from 1990 to 2010. The accounts were subjected to a thematic analysis. Results Four broad themes were revealed: the overall philosophy of de-institutionalisation, with the aim to overcome old- fashioned asylum style care; finances, with a pressure to limit expenditure and an interest of provider organisations to increase income; limitations of community mental health care in which most severely ill patients may be neglected; and emphasis on risk containment so that patients posing a risk may be cared for in institutions. Whilst all themes were mentioned in all three countries, there were also differences in emphasis and detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychiatrization of Society: a Conceptual Framework and Call for Transdisciplinary Research
    CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS published: 04 June 2021 doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.645556 Psychiatrization of Society: A Conceptual Framework and Call for Transdisciplinary Research Timo Beeker 1*, China Mills 2, Dinesh Bhugra 3, Sanne te Meerman 4, Samuel Thoma 1, Martin Heinze 1 and Sebastian von Peter 1 1 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf, Germany, 2 School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom, 3 King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom, 4 School of Education, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, Netherlands Purpose: Worldwide, there have been consistently high or even rising incidences of Edited by: diagnosed mental disorders and increasing mental healthcare service utilization over the Hector Wing Hong Tsang, last decades, causing a growing burden for healthcare systems and societies. While Hong Kong Polytechnic more individuals than ever are being diagnosed and treated as mentally ill, psychiatric University, China Reviewed by: knowledge, and practices affect the lives of a rising number of people, gain importance in Rakesh Kumar Chadda, society as a whole and shape more and more areas of life. This process can be described All India Institute of Medical as the progressing psychiatrization of society. Sciences, India Daniel Kwasi Ahorsu, Methods: This article is a conceptual paper, focusing on theoretical considerations Hong Kong Polytechnic and theory development. As a starting point for further research, we suggest a basic University, China model of psychiatrization, taking into account its main sub-processes as well as its major *Correspondence: Timo Beeker top-down and bottom-up drivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Pushing the Boundaries of Psychiatric Neuroimaging to Ground Diagnosis in Biology
    Opinion | Cognition and Behavior Pushing the boundaries of psychiatric neuroimaging to ground diagnosis in biology https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0384-19.2019 Cite as: eNeuro 2019; 10.1523/ENEURO.0384-19.2019 Received: 20 September 2019 Revised: 22 October 2019 Accepted: 23 October 2019 This Early Release article has been peer-reviewed and accepted, but has not been through the composition and copyediting processes. The final version may differ slightly in style or formatting and will contain links to any extended data. Alerts: Sign up at www.eneuro.org/alerts to receive customized email alerts when the fully formatted version of this article is published. Copyright © 2019 Saggar and Uddin This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed. Manuscript Title Pushing the boundaries of psychiatric neuroimaging to ground diagnosis in biology Abbreviated Title Pushing the boundaries of psychiatric neuroimaging List all Author Names and Affiliations in order as they would appear in the published article Manish Saggar1, Ph.D. and Lucina Q. Uddin2, Ph.D. 1Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University 2Department of Psychology, University of Miami Author Contributions: Both authors contributed to literature survey, discussion and writing of the manuscript Correspondence should be addressed to Manish Saggar 401 Quarry Rd, Stanford CA 94305 Email: [email protected] Number of figures: 2 Number of tables: 0 Number of words for Abstract: 47 Number of words for Significance Statement: 79 Number of words for Introduction: 590 Number of words for Discussion: 3,134 Acknowledgements: We thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable feedback.
    [Show full text]