DOCSLIB.ORG

English Perceptions of the Scots During the Regal Union by Sarah

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
English Perceptions of the Scots During the Regal Union by Sarah Talking Scot: English Perceptions of the Scots During the Regal Union By Sarah Katerina Waurechen A thesis submitted to the Department of History in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen‟s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada April 2011 © Sarah Waurechen 2011 Abstract From 1603 until 1707, England and Scotland were joined by what scholars have described as the regal union. A dynastic accident that came into being when James VI of Scotland inherited the English throne as well, it forced the two kingdoms to share a single monarch without creating a unified legal system, religious hierarchy, political structure or British culture. This dissertation re-evaluates the resultant Anglo-Scottish relationship by examining what English people actually said about the Scots and Scotland during moments when this union was strained. Specifically, it explores discourses about the Scots that circulated immediately after the regal union, and those which appeared during the Bishops‟ Wars (1638-40), the Cromwellian Union (1651-59), the Popish Plot and Exclusion Crisis (1679-81), and the parliamentary union of 1707 that renegotiated the terms of engagement. By doing so, it challenges widespread assumptions that an uncomplicated xenophobia dominated English approaches to the Scots, and illuminates the existence of a more nuanced Anglo-Scottish dynamic that still informs British politics today. The Scots were too similar to be Other, and too different to be wholly Same – their “familiar alterity” creating difficulties for the English. At the start of the regal union, the notion of what constituted a Scot was malleable and utilitarian, which encouraged the English to reject their partnership in the creation of a new British kingdom. During periods of outright Scottish assertiveness, however, the English were forced to remember their northern neighbours. At each of these moments, the Scots variously became beggars, locusts, radicals, worthy partners in empire, protestant deliverers and even role models, before the English were able to write them out of the equation again. Finally, in i 1707, a parliamentary union mandated that within official discourse, the Scots were to be interpreted as familiars and as equals, in an attempt to cement their position and thus solidify the Anglo-Scottish relationship. In many ways, this meant nothing more than a divergence between official and popular discourses, but it did permanently intertwine English and Scottish development, no matter how intense divisive pressures became. ii Acknowledgements In fulfillment of a very old promise, this dissertation is dedicated to E.A. Clarke... with love and squalor. This project was conceived, researched and written over almost six years and in the process I have amassed many debts. My supervisor, Professor Daniel Woolf has been a constant source of knowledge and encouragement. Many thanks are also due, however, to Dr. Jordan Penney, Dr. Marjon Ames, Dr. Jeffrey Collins, and Professor Brian Levack, who have all read and commented on the work as it progressed. Special thanks are also due to Professor John Morrill for the stimulating conversations near the outset of this project, and to Dr. R. Scott Spurlock who so willingly shared research and offered the pointed challenges I required to crystallize my thinking. Finally, I owe personal thanks to Dr. Michelle di Meo and her family, for sheltering me in London on multiple occasions, to Dr. Ian Hesketh for guidance and the kind of frank conversation without which one cannot finish such a lengthy project, and to Marisha Caswell, whose agreement to take over my class for a day has allowed me to defend this dissertation. The University of Alberta, Queen‟s University, the Social Sciences and Research Council of Canada, and the Killam Foundation have all provided essential funding for the completion of this project. The SSHRC-funded Major Collaborative Research Initiative, Making Publics in Early Modern Europe (MaPs), has also been central to my evolution as a scholar and to the theoretical framework of this dissertation. Not only has MaPs provided special funding, seminars and conference experiences, the expertise and friendship of their membership has been a constant source of inspiration. While it would iii be inappropriate not to acknowledge the place of each and every person associated with MaPs, it is also imperative that I highlight the mentorship provided by Professor Lesley Cormack, Professor Robert Tittler, and Professor Brian Cowan. Equally important, the staff at the British Library, the National Archives of Scotland, the National Library of Scotland, the National Archives in Kew, The Bodleian, and the University Library at Cambridge must be thanked for fetching innumerable manuscripts and answering questions of all colours. Segments of this dissertation have been presented at conferences in North America and Europe, and I must also acknowledge the role played by those experiences and the conversations which accompanied them. Most importantly though, I feel it is necessary to pause and thank the Department of History here at Queen‟s. Although I arrived late to their doorstep – as a stranger, and a transfer student from the University of Alberta – I was always made to feel welcome. There were always graduate students and professors willing to share their ideas about teaching and research, and to encourage me during that final, difficult stretch. I am honoured to have been able to call you my colleagues. Despite the guidance of all of those people, groups and institutions, flaws no doubt remain in my manuscript. Thus, I close by acknowledging that all errors are my own. iv Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgements .................................................................................................... iii Chapter One: Introduction – The Problem of Familiar Alterity and the English Evasion of Britain ......................................................................................................... 1 Chapter Two: Imagined Polities, Failed Dreams, and the Beginnings of an Unacknowledged Britain ............................................................................................ 31 Chapter Three: The Bishops‟ Wars and the Elusiveness of National Borders ......... 83 Chapter Four: The Interregnum and Experimentation with an Incorporating Union ......................................................................................................................... 129 Chapter Five: Contemplating the Chimera – Discourses about Scotland during the Popish Plot and Exclusion Crisis ........................................................................ 181 Chapter Six: Seen but not Heard – The English Vision of Union in 1707 ............. 229 Chapter Seven: Conclusion – Persistent Evasion and the Dawning of a New Age .................................................................................................................... 280 Bibliography ............................................................................................................ 291 v Chapter 1: Introduction – The Problem of Familiar Alterity and the English Evasion of Britain From 1603 until 1707, England and Scotland were linked by what scholars have called the union of the crowns, or the regal union.1 The product of Elizabeth I‟s stalwart refusal to fulfill one of her primary duties as monarch – to provide an heir of her own body – this union came into being when her cousin, King James VI of Scotland, succeeded her on the English throne and linked the two crowns in his person and dynasty. James‟s right, as the great-grandson of Margaret Tudor, was relatively straightforward and he obtained his second crown without contest. The problem, however, was that while he saw this as the birth of a new era, in which the English and the Scots would come together in brotherly love and shared religion to rebuild the kingdom of Britain and resurrect its ancient glory, his subjects in either realm preferred to view their situation simply in terms of sharing a king. Attempts to create a unified British political infrastructure through the English and Scottish parliaments failed miserably and, in the end, James had to be content with the mere removal of the hostile laws that separated the two kingdoms and the eventual cross-border naturalization of his subjects. The relationship between these two peoples thus remained ambiguous while the Stuarts ruled. England and Scotland shared a protestant faith, but their churches upheld divergent disciplinary practices; they shared a language, but strong dialects persisted; they shared a monarch, but no legislative, religious or legal institutions; and they shared an island, but there were vast disparities in the quality and quantity of land in each 1 For surveys of the regal union, see David L. Smith, A History of the Modern British Isles: The Double Crown (Oxford: Blackwell, 1998); Brian Levack, The Formation of a British State: England, Scotland, and the Union, 1603-1707 (Oxford: Clarendon, 1987); Keith Brown, Kingdom or Province? Scotland and the Regal Union, 1603-1715 (New York: St. Martin‟s Press, 1992). 1 kingdom, as well as the levels of trade and urban development. England was stronger, bigger, and richer, but the Scots were stubbornly protective of their sovereignty and aggressively defensive of their Kirk, and so there was an
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cloud of Witnesses
    1 CLOUD OF WITNESSES FOR THE ROYAL PREROGATIVES OF JESUS CHRIST BEING THE LAST SPEECHES AND TESTIMONIES OF THOSE WHO HAVE SUFFERED FOR THE TRUTH IN SCOTLAND. SINCE THE YEAR 1680. In het Engels beschreven door N.N. With historical and explanatory notes by John H. Thomson, 1871 STICHTING DE GIHONBRON MIDDELBURG 2007 2 Conclusions of the General Meeting at Crawfordjohn, April 21, 1697. "That a true and exact account of all the persecutors within the several quarters; of the remarkable judgments and deaths, or what hath befallen to their families or estates; be made up and brought to the next general meeting.” CRAWFORDJOHN, April 5, 1699. "That all the respective Societies send an index of all the late martyrs' testimonies, not in 'Naphtali,' to the next general meeting.” CRAWFORDJOHN, Oct. 29, 1701. "First concluded, that all the correspondences provide and make ready stones as signs of honor to be set upon the graves of our late martyrs has soon as possible; and all the names of the foresaid martyrs, with their speeches and testimonies, and by whom they were martyred or killed in house or fields, country or city, as far as possible to be brought to the next general meeting, in order for the epitaphs; and likewise an account of those martyrs' carriage and behavior in the time of their martyrdom.” "Secondly concluded, a review of the former conclusions concerning the remarkable judgments of the persecutors, and the diligence of the correspondences and Societies to be diligently brought to the next general meeting.” CRAWFORDJOHN, Oct. 21, 1710. "That an index of all the martyrs' testimonies that are not in 'Naphtali,' who were martyred in Scotland, be had from all quarters against the next general meeting; likewise an account of all the martyrs' names that suffered in this kingdom.” CRAWFORDJOHN, February 23, 1711 "The martyrs' testimonies were given into Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pre-History of Self-Determination: Union and Disunion of States in Early Modern International Law
    THE PRE-HISTORY OF SELF-DETERMINATION: UNION AND DISUNION OF STATES IN EARLY MODERN INTERNATIONAL LAW Han Liu* TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................ 2 I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 2 II. THE STATE AND THE NATION STATE ................................................................... 7 III. TERRITORIAL ACCESSION IN EARLY MODERN EUROPE ...................................... 9 A. The King and the Sovereign .......................................................................... 9 B. Land and Territory ....................................................................................... 15 1. Division of Realms ................................................................................... 17 2. Land and Sovereignty............................................................................... 18 3. Dynastic-Patrimonial Territoriality .......................................................... 20 4. Shape of Early Modern Territory ............................................................. 22 C. Aggregating Land: Conquest and Inheritance.............................................. 24 IV. OUTSIDE EUROPE: LAND APPROPRIATION AND COLONIAL EXPANSION........... 27 A. Just War as Civilizing Process: Vitoria’s Catholic Argument ..................... 29 B. Conquest or Settlement: Locke, Vattel, and the Protestant Argument ........ 31 V. THE JURIDICIAL
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Liberty in England and Revolutionary America
    P1: IwX/KaD 0521827450agg.xml CY395B/Ward 0 521 82745 0 May 7, 2004 7:37 The Politics of Liberty in England and Revolutionary America LEE WARD Campion College University of Regina iii P1: IwX/KaD 0521827450agg.xml CY395B/Ward 0 521 82745 0 May 7, 2004 7:37 published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom cambridge university press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cb2 2ru, uk 40 West 20th Street, New York, ny 10011-4211, usa 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, vic 3207, Australia Ruiz de Alarcon´ 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, South Africa http://www.cambridge.org C Lee Ward 2004 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2004 Printed in the United States of America Typeface Sabon 10/12 pt. System LATEX 2ε [tb] A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Ward, Lee, 1970– The politics of liberty in England and revolutionary America / Lee Ward p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and index. isbn 0-521-82745-0 1. Political science – Great Britain – Philosophy – History – 17th century. 2. Political science – Great Britain – Philosophy – History – 18th century. 3. Political science – United States – Philosophy – History – 17th century. 4. Political science – United States – Philosophy – History – 18th century. 5. United States – History – Revolution, 1775–1783 – Causes.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Canongate 1.1. Background Canongate's Close Proximity to The
    Edinburgh Graveyards Project: Documentary Survey For Canongate Kirkyard --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Canongate 1.1. Background Canongate’s close proximity to the Palace of Holyroodhouse, which is situated at the eastern end of Canongate Burgh, has been influential on both the fortunes of the Burgh and the establishment of Canongate Kirk. In 1687, King James VII declared that the Abbey Church of Holyroodhouse was to be used as the chapel for the re-established Order of the Thistle and for the performance of Catholic rites when the Royal Court was in residence at Holyrood. The nave of this chapel had been used by the Burgh of Canongate as a place of Protestant worship since the Reformation in the mid sixteenth century, but with the removal of access to the Abbey Church to practise their faith, the parishioners of Canongate were forced to find an alternative venue in which to worship. Fortunately, some 40 years before this edict by James VII, funds had been bequeathed to the inhabitants of Canongate to erect a church in the Burgh - and these funds had never been spent. This money was therefore used to build Canongate Kirk and a Kirkyard was laid out within its grounds shortly after building work commenced in 1688. 1 Development It has been ruminated whether interments may have occurred on this site before the construction of the Kirk or the landscaping of the Kirkyard2 as all burial rights within the church had been removed from the parishioners of the Canongate in the 1670s, when the Abbey Church had became the chapel of the King.3 The earliest known plan of the Kirkyard dates to 1765 (Figure 1), and depicts a rectilinear area on the northern side of Canongate burgh with arboreal planting 1 John Gifford et al., Edinburgh, The Buildings of Scotland: Pevsner Architectural Guides (London : Penguin, 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • POLITICS, SOCIETY and CIVIL WAR in WARWICKSHIRE, 162.0-1660 Cambridge Studies in Early Modern British History
    Cambridge Studies in Early Modern British History POLITICS, SOCIETY AND CIVIL WAR IN WARWICKSHIRE, 162.0-1660 Cambridge Studies in Early Modern British History Series editors ANTHONY FLETCHER Professor of History, University of Durham JOHN GUY Reader in British History, University of Bristol and JOHN MORRILL Lecturer in History, University of Cambridge, and Fellow and Tutor of Selwyn College This is a new series of monographs and studies covering many aspects of the history of the British Isles between the late fifteenth century and the early eighteenth century. It will include the work of established scholars and pioneering work by a new generation of scholars. It will include both reviews and revisions of major topics and books which open up new historical terrain or which reveal startling new perspectives on familiar subjects. It is envisaged that all the volumes will set detailed research into broader perspectives and the books are intended for the use of students as well as of their teachers. Titles in the series The Common Peace: Participation and the Criminal Law in Seventeenth-Century England CYNTHIA B. HERRUP Politics, Society and Civil War in Warwickshire, 1620—1660 ANN HUGHES London Crowds in the Reign of Charles II: Propaganda and Politics from the Restoration to the Exclusion Crisis TIM HARRIS Criticism and Compliment: The Politics of Literature in the Reign of Charles I KEVIN SHARPE Central Government and the Localities: Hampshire 1649-1689 ANDREW COLEBY POLITICS, SOCIETY AND CIVIL WAR IN WARWICKSHIRE, i620-1660 ANN HUGHES Lecturer in History, University of Manchester The right of the University of Cambridge to print and sell all manner of books was granted by Henry VIII in 1534.
    [Show full text]
  • Swivel-Eyed Loons Had Found Their Cheerleader at Last: Like Nobody Else, Boris Could Put a Jolly Gloss on Their Ugly Tale of Brexit As Cultural Class- War
    DOWNLOAD CSS Notes, Books, MCQs, Magazines www.thecsspoint.com Download CSS Notes Download CSS Books Download CSS Magazines Download CSS MCQs Download CSS Past Papers The CSS Point, Pakistan’s The Best Online FREE Web source for All CSS Aspirants. Email: [email protected] BUY CSS / PMS / NTS & GENERAL KNOWLEDGE BOOKS ONLINE CASH ON DELIVERY ALL OVER PAKISTAN Visit Now: WWW.CSSBOOKS.NET For Oder & Inquiry Call/SMS/WhatsApp 0333 6042057 – 0726 540141 FPSC Model Papers 50th Edition (Latest & Updated) By Imtiaz Shahid Advanced Publishers For Order Call/WhatsApp 03336042057 - 0726540141 CSS Solved Compulsory MCQs From 2000 to 2020 Latest & Updated Order Now Call/SMS 03336042057 - 0726540141 Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power & Peace By Hans Morgenthau FURTHER PRAISE FOR JAMES HAWES ‘Engaging… I suspect I shall remember it for a lifetime’ The Oldie on The Shortest History of Germany ‘Here is Germany as you’ve never known it: a bold thesis; an authoritative sweep and an exhilarating read. Agree or disagree, this is a must for anyone interested in how Germany has come to be the way it is today.’ Professor Karen Leeder, University of Oxford ‘The Shortest History of Germany, a new, must-read book by the writer James Hawes, [recounts] how the so-called limes separating Roman Germany from non-Roman Germany has remained a formative distinction throughout the post-ancient history of the German people.’ Economist.com ‘A daring attempt to remedy the ignorance of the centuries in little over 200 pages... not just an entertaining canter
    [Show full text]
  • National Self-Determination in Times of Shared Sovereignty: Goals and Principles from Catalonia to Europe in the 21St Century
    Informe National Self-determination in Times of Shared Sovereignty: Goals and Principles from Catalonia to Europe in the 21st Century AUTHOR: Simon Toubeau PEER REVIEWER: Pere Almeda Aquest informe forma part del programa Llegat Pasqual Maragall que rep el suport de: Contents Part I. The Sources of Deadlock 1. The Ambiguity of Sovereignty 2. Conflicting Claims to National Sovereignty 3. National Minorities have no Right to Self-determination 4. The Persistence of Claims to National Self-Determination 5. The Difficulties of Accommodating Multiple Identities 6. National Self-Determination is equated with Secession 7. Domestic Consent as the Condition for Recognition 8. Protecting the Constitutional Identity of EU Member-States Part II. Scenarios, Proposals and Pathways to Reform 1. An Ambitious Hope: Internal Enlargement in the EU 2. A Bad Alternative: External Secession 3. The Cost of the Status Quo: Informal Politics 4. Dis-Aggregating Sovereignty and Statehood 5. The European Framework: Differentiated Integration 6. A Realistic Proposal (I): Domestic Recognition and Tri-Partite Federalism 7. A Realistic Proposal (II): Functional and Relational Sovereignty in the EU 8. The International Autonomy and Recognition of Non-State Groups Conclusion Bibliography I. The Sources of Deadlock - There is right to national self-determination under international law - collective rights of nation- territorial cultural community (ethnic, linguistic, religious) to choose its own state - not exclusively belonging to nations that form states (e.g decolonization), can be about forging your own state. - about giving consent to form of government - democratic choice via referendum, exercising popular sovereignty - it is about a claim to a collective right about forms of government that are exercised through democratic mechanisms (elections, referendums).
    [Show full text]
  • Christopher Upton Phd Thesis
    ?@A374? 7; ?2<@@7?6 81@7; 2IQJRSOPIFQ 1$ APSON 1 @IFRJR ?TCMJSSFE GOQ SIF 3FHQFF OG =I3 BS SIF ANJUFQRJSX OG ?S$ 1NEQFVR '.-+ 5TLL MFSBEBSB GOQ SIJR JSFM JR BUBJLBCLF JN >FRFBQDI0?S1NEQFVR/5TLL@FWS BS/ ISSP/%%QFRFBQDI#QFPORJSOQX$RS#BNEQFVR$BD$TK% =LFBRF TRF SIJR JEFNSJGJFQ SO DJSF OQ LJNK SO SIJR JSFM/ ISSP/%%IEL$IBNELF$NFS%'&&()%(,)* @IJR JSFM JR PQOSFDSFE CX OQJHJNBL DOPXQJHIS STUDIES IN SCOTTISH LATIN by Christopher A. Upton Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of St. Andrews October 1984 ýýFCA ýý£ s'i ý`q. q DRE N.6 - Parentibus meis conjugique meae. Iý Christopher Allan Upton hereby certify that this thesis which is approximately 100,000 words in length has been written by men that it is the record of work carried out by me and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. ý.. 'C) : %6 date .... .... signature of candidat 1404100 I was admitted as a research student under Ordinance No. 12 on I October 1977 and as a candidate for the degree of Ph. D. on I October 1978; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 1977 and 1980. $'ý.... date . .. 0&0.9 0. signature of candidat I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate to the degree of Ph. D. of the University of St Andrews and that he is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree.
    [Show full text]
  • English Radicalism and the Struggle for Reform
    English Radicalism and the Struggle for Reform The Library of Sir Geoffrey Bindman, QC. Part I. BERNARD QUARITCH LTD MMXX BERNARD QUARITCH LTD 36 Bedford Row, London, WC1R 4JH tel.: +44 (0)20 7297 4888 fax: +44 (0)20 7297 4866 email: [email protected] / [email protected] web: www.quaritch.com Bankers: Barclays Bank PLC 1 Churchill Place London E14 5HP Sort code: 20-65-90 Account number: 10511722 Swift code: BUKBGB22 Sterling account: IBAN: GB71 BUKB 2065 9010 5117 22 Euro account: IBAN: GB03 BUKB 2065 9045 4470 11 U.S. Dollar account: IBAN: GB19 BUKB 2065 9063 9924 44 VAT number: GB 322 4543 31 Front cover: from item 106 (Gillray) Rear cover: from item 281 (Peterloo Massacre) Opposite: from item 276 (‘Martial’) List 2020/1 Introduction My father qualified in medicine at Durham University in 1926 and practised in Gateshead on Tyne for the next 43 years – excluding 6 years absence on war service from 1939 to 1945. From his student days he had been an avid book collector. He formed relationships with antiquarian booksellers throughout the north of England. His interests were eclectic but focused on English literature of the 17th and 18th centuries. Several of my father’s books have survived in the present collection. During childhood I paid little attention to his books but in later years I too became a collector. During the war I was evacuated to the Lake District and my school in Keswick incorporated Greta Hall, where Coleridge lived with Robert Southey and his family. So from an early age the Lake Poets were a significant part of my life and a focus of my book collecting.
    [Show full text]
  • James VI and I and Rule Over Two Kingdoms: an English View*
    JamesBlackwellOxford,HISRHistorical0950-3471©20037621000OriginalConrad Institute VI UKRussellArticle andResearchPublishing of Historical I and rule Ltd Research over two kingdoms2003 VI and I and rule over two kingdoms: an English view* Conrad Russell King’s College London Abstract This article compares English and Scottish responses to the union of the crowns in 1603 following the accession of James VI and I. It examines the reluctance of the English to rethink their ideas on sovereignty, and the problems inherent in an ‘imperfect union’. When King James VI of Scotland inherited the throne of England in March 1603, it meant profound institutional and political changes in the distribu- tion of power in Scotland. Yet paradoxically, because of Scottish views on the nature of power and of the state, it meant a comparatively small intel- lectual adjustment of those views. By contrast, in England, the accession of a Scottish king made little difference to the course of English political life, but it offered a far-reaching challenge to English views about the nature of sovereignty and of the state. Seen from south of the border, the troubles caused by the union were those resulting from the failure of the English to rethink their ideas on sovereignty. This failure prevented them from thinking constructively about the new relationship into which they had entered through the union of the crowns. Indeed, it often prevented them from admitting that they had entered into any relationship at all. In the terminology of the day, the union of the crowns in 1603 was an ‘imperfect union’, between two sovereign states under a common authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Irish and Scottish Studies Cultural Exchange: from Medieval
    Journal of Irish and Scottish Studies Volume 1: Issue 1 Cultural Exchange: from Medieval to Modernity AHRC Centre for Irish and Scottish Studies JOURNAL OF IRISH AND SCOTTISH STUDIES Volume 1, Issue 1 Cultural Exchange: Medieval to Modern Published by the AHRC Centre for Irish and Scottish Studies at the University of Aberdeen in association with The universities of the The Irish-Scottish Academic Initiative and The Stout Research Centre Irish-Scottish Studies Programme Victoria University of Wellington ISSN 1753-2396 Journal of Irish and Scottish Studies Issue Editor: Cairns Craig Associate Editors: Stephen Dornan, Michael Gardiner, Rosalyn Trigger Editorial Advisory Board: Fran Brearton, Queen’s University, Belfast Eleanor Bell, University of Strathclyde Michael Brown, University of Aberdeen Ewen Cameron, University of Edinburgh Sean Connolly, Queen’s University, Belfast Patrick Crotty, University of Aberdeen David Dickson, Trinity College, Dublin T. M. Devine, University of Edinburgh David Dumville, University of Aberdeen Aaron Kelly, University of Edinburgh Edna Longley, Queen’s University, Belfast Peter Mackay, Queen’s University, Belfast Shane Alcobia-Murphy, University of Aberdeen Brad Patterson, Victoria University of Wellington Ian Campbell Ross, Trinity College, Dublin The Journal of Irish and Scottish Studies is a peer reviewed journal, published twice yearly in September and March, by the AHRC Centre for Irish and Scottish Studies at the University of Aberdeen. An electronic reviews section is available on the AHRC Centre’s website: http://www.abdn.ac.uk/riiss/ahrc- centre.shtml Editorial correspondence, including manuscripts for submission, should be addressed to The Editors,Journal of Irish and Scottish Studies, AHRC Centre for Irish and Scottish Studies, Humanity Manse, 19 College Bounds, University of Aberdeen, AB24 3UG or emailed to [email protected] Subscriptions and business correspondence should be address to The Administrator.
    [Show full text]
  • Bonnie Prince Charlie and the Jacobites Teacher & Adult Helper
    Bonnie Prince Charlie and the Jacobites Teacher & Adult Helper Notes Contents 1 Visiting the Exhibition 2 The Exhibition 3 Answers to the Trail Page 1 – Family Tree Page 2 – 1689 (James VII and II) Page 3 – 1708 (James VIII and III) Page 4 – 1745 (Bonnie Prince Charlie) 4 After your visit 5 Additional Resources National Museums Scotland Scottish Charity, No. SC011130 illustrations © Jenny Proudfoot www.jennyproudfoot.co.uk Bonnie Prince Charlie and the Jacobites Teacher & Adult Helper Notes 1 Introduction Explore the real story of Prince Charles Edward Stuart, better known as Bonnie Prince Charlie, and the rise and fall of the Jacobites. Step into the world of the Royal House of Stuart, one dynasty divided into two courts by religion, politics and war, each fighting for the throne of thethree kingdoms of Scotland, England and Ireland. Discover how four Jacobite kings became pawns in a much wider European political game. And follow the Jacobites’ fight to regain their lost kingdoms through five challenges to the throne, the last ending in crushing defeat at the Battle of Culloden and Bonnie Prince Charlie’s escape to the Isle of Skye and onwards to Europe. The schools trail will help your class explore the exhibition and the Jacobite story through three key players: James VII and II, James VIII and III and Bonnie Prince Charlie. 1. Visiting the Exhibition (Please share this information with your adult helpers) Page Character Year Exhibition sections Important information 1 N/A N/A The Stuart Dynasty and the Union of the Crowns • Food and drink is not permitted 2 James VII 1688 Dynasty restored, Dynasty • Photography is not allowed and II divided, A court in exile • When completing the trail, ensure pupils use a pencil 3 James VIII 1708- The challenges of James VIII and III 1715 and III, All roads lead to Rome • You will enter and exit via different doors.
    [Show full text]