Downloads/ Category/92-Carp-Scenarios-And-Options-For-Future-Development 11 Arlanza, R.S., Gordoncillo, P.U., Meliczek, H., Palafox, J.A.F., &Peñalba, L.M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Downloads/ Category/92-Carp-Scenarios-And-Options-For-Future-Development 11 Arlanza, R.S., Gordoncillo, P.U., Meliczek, H., Palafox, J.A.F., &Peñalba, L.M GLOBAL ON THE FOCUS SOUTH Published by Focus on the Global South With support from 11.11.11 and Development and Peace-Canada Copyright @September, 2018 by Focus on the Global South Printed in the Philippines Focus on the Global South - Philippines Office #19 Maginhawa Street UP Village, Diliman, Quezon City http://focusweb.org Research Project Coordinator: Mary Ann Manahan Project Advisors: Eddie Quitoriano, Eduardo Tadem, Jenina Joy Chavez, and Jerome Patrick Cruz Authors/Contributors: Danilo Carranza, Rina Reyes, Raphael Baladad, Carmina Flores-Obanil, Ricardo Reyes, Rosanne Rutten, and Robin Thiers Editorial Team: Clarissa Militante, Jenina Joy Chavez-Malaluan, and Mary Ann Manahan Research Assistant: Reagan John Gabriel Layout Artist: Amy Tejada Photos in Front Cover: Jimmy Domingo (photo of farmer with carabao & of farmer with tractor); File photos of Focus on the Global South CONTENT 6 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 8 Introduction: Part One Thirty Years of Agrarian Reform under CARP/ER Is there Reason to Celebrate? BY MARY ANN MANAHAN 22 Introduction: Part Two The Research Project Background, Methodology, and Findings BY MARY ANN MANAHAN 35 Disaster After Disaster Agrarian Reform in Post-Yolanda Recovery in Leyte BY DANILO CARRANZA AND RINA REYES 54 Land Enclosures versus Historical Occupancy What Remedy Does CARPER Offer? BY RAPHAEL BALADAD 71 Agrarian Reform in Nueva Ecija Gains, Reversals, and Challenges in a Long-Drawn Out Process BY CARMINA FLORES-OBANIL 93 Hacienda Luisita after CARP Implementation BY RICARDO REYES 108 Beneficiaries in Negros Occidental From Hacienda Workers to Landed Laborers? BY ROSANNE RUTTEN 128 Banana Negotiations Contracting in the Davao del Norte Export Banana Sector after CARP BY ROBIN THIERS 141 ABOUT THE AUTHORS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS A&D Alienable and Disposable AMBALA Alyansa ng Manggagawang Bukid sa Asyenda Luisita AMMMA-Katipunan Aniban ng Magsasaka, Mangingisda at Manggagawa sa Agrikultura APCP Agrarian Production Credit Program ARB/s Agrarian Reform Beneficiary/ies ARBO Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries’ Organization ARC/s Agrarian Reform Community/ies ARCCESS Agrarian Reform Community Connectivity and Economic Support Services ATFI Alter Trade Foundation, Inc. ATM Automatic Teller Machine AVA/s Agribusiness Venture Agreement/s BARC Barangay Agrarian Reform Committee BFA Bugho Farmers Association BHWD Barangay Health Worker BSWM Bureau of Soils and Water Management CA Compulsory Acquisition CALABARZON Cavite, Laguna, Batangas, Rizal, and Quezon CARL Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law CARP Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program CARPER Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program Extension with Reform CB Central Bank CBFM Community-Based Forests Management CLOA Certificate of Land Ownership Award COCAR Congressional Oversight Committee on Agrarian Reform CO-OP/s Cooperative/s CPP Communist Party of the Philippines DA Department of Agriculture DALO Democratic Alliance Labor Organization DAR Department of Agrarian Reform DARAB DAR Adjudication Board DARPO Department of Agrarian Reform Provincial Office DENR Department of Environment and Natural Resources DILG Department of the Interior and Local Government DND Department of National Defense EP Emancipation Patent FARM Farmworkers Agrarian Reform Movement FB Farmer Beneficiaries FGD/s Focus Group Discussion/s FOB Freight on Board FOCUS Focus on the Global South GFI Government Finance Institution GOL/KKK Government-owned Land/Kilusang Kabuhayan at Kaunlaran GSIS Government Service Insurance System ha/s. Hectare/s HEIP Hermosa Ecozone Industrial Park HFCS High Fructose Corn Syrup HLI Hacienda Luisita, Inc. JEEP Joint Economic Enterprise for Productivity KABAPA Katipunan ng Bagong Pilipina KATARUNGAN Kilusan para sa Repormang Agraryo at Katarungang Panlipunan kg kilogram KII Key Informant Interview 6 REPORMANG AGRARYO AT PAGBABAGO? NARRATIVES ON AGRARIAN CONFLICTS, TRANSITIONS, AND TRANSFORMATION km kilometer KMP-Negros Kilusang Magbubukid ng Pilipinas-Negros KWACI KASUCO Workers Agricultural Cooperative LAD Land Acquisition Distribution LGU/s Local Government Unit/s LRA Land Registration Authority LSBDA Leyte Sab-A Basin Development Authority MAR Ministry of Agrarian Reform MEPI Marsman Estate Plantation, Inc. MIARBA Minoro-Isabel Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries Association NACUSIP National Congress of Unions in the Sugar Industry of the Philippines NFSW National Federation of Sugar Workers NGO/s Non-Government Organization/s NIFTF Negros Island Fair Trade Federation NIKE-NE Nagkakaisang Kababaihang Entrepreneurs-Nueva Ecija NOC Notice of Coverage NOFTA Negros Organic and Fair Trade Association NPA New People’s Army OFW Overseas Filipino Worker OIC Officer in Charge OLT Operation Land Transfer ONARBPA Occidental Negros Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries Planters Association OP Office of the President OPA Office of the Provincial Agriculturist OPARR Office of the Presidential Adviser for Reconstruction and Rehabilitation OSEC Office of the Secretary PARC Presidential Agrarian Reform Council PARCCOM Provincial Agrarian Reform Coordinating Committee PBD Program Beneficiary Development PCA Philippine Coconut Authority PD Presidential Decree PDG Paghida-et saKauswagan Development Group, Inc. Philippine Peso PhP PKKK Pambansang Koalisyon ng Kababaihan sa Kanayunan RA Republic Act RD Regional Director RDC Riverforest Development Corporation RIGHTS INC. Rural Poor Institute for Land and Human Rights Services, Inc. ROD Registry of Deeds SAC Social Action Center SANAMABASU Samahang Nagkakaisang Mamamayan ng Barangay Sumalo SC Supreme Court SDO Stock Distribution Option SEZs Special Economic Zones SIDA Sugarcane Industry Development Act sq. m Square Metre SRA Sugar Regulatory Administration SSS Social Security System STW Shallow-Tube Well TADECO Tarlac Development Corporation TCT Transfer Certificate of Title TRO Temporary Restraining Order ULWU United Luisita Workers Union UMA Unyon ng mga Mangagawa sa Agrikultura UPALs Untitled Privately-claimed Agricultural Lands USD United States Dollar VLT Voluntary Land Transfer VOS Voluntary Offer to Sell REPORMANG AGRARYO AT PAGBABAGO? NARRATIVES ON AGRARIAN CONFLICTS, TRANSITIONS, AND TRANSFORMATION 7 INTRODUCTION: PART ONE THIRTY YEARS OF AGRARIAN REFORM UNDER CARP/ER IS THERE REASON TO CELEBRATE? BY MARY ANN MANAHAN When the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP)1 was enacted 30 years ago, it was envisioned as a reform measure to fulfill the 1987 Constitution’s multiple goals to reduce rural poverty, foster rural development and industrialization, and usher in an era of lasting peace in the countryside. Since then, CARP and its two extensions have been considered as a litmus test of past and present administrations’ commitment to social justice as well as the state’s political will to break up land monopolies and control in the countryside in favor of those who work the land—the landless, small, and near-landless farmers, women in agriculture, and farmworkers. The promise of agrarian reform was change; its essence, political, i.e., the redistribution of wealth and resources in the countryside, and its implementation, therefore, a political process. It is no surprise that the program engendered impassioned public debates, strategies, and political maneuvers, for or against it. These debates continue to rage until this day—is CARP/ER a success or failure? What does it have to show for three decades? What do the whole generation of Filipino farmers and their children that grew up clamoring for its effective and full implementation have to say? Why are farmers not in full control of their lands? To respond to these questions, Focus on the Global South and the Save Agrarian Reform Alliance, a coalition of small and landless farmers, farmworkers, and rural women that campaigns for agrarian reform, social justice, and rural development, embarked on an initiative called CARP/ER Audit (see The Research Project for details). The CARP/ER Audit aimed to critically examine various aspects of CARP/ER’s accomplishment and implementation, i.e. to unpack and understand the stories behind government’s data and narratives of the lives and perspectives of the people affected by the law and its implementing agencies. 8 REPORMANG AGRARYO AT PAGBABAGO? NARRATIVES ON AGRARIAN CONFLICTS, TRANSITIONS, AND TRANSFORMATION This introduction is divided into two parts. Part One deals with a critical interrogation of the government’s data on CARP/ER’s accomplishments, looking at both public and private agricultural lands under the Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR) and the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR). Part Two introduces the research project, its background, methodology, and findings. CARP/ER’s Dubious Records Land (re)distribution is the heart of the nationwide agrarian reform program. According to the DAR, the main government agency mandated to implement CARP and its extension with reforms (CARPER), the state has distributed close to 4.8 million hectares of private and non-private agricultural lands to about 2.8 million agrarian reform beneficiaries in the country. This represents 88 percent of the total 5.4 million hectares of agricultural lands targeted for (re)distribution by DAR, and 34 percent of certified alienable and disposable (A&D)2 lands in the country. These figures also include rice and corn lands that were earlier transferred under PD 27 through its operation land transfer. The numbers could be taken as a significant feat and for DAR, a near completion of its land distribution task. Table 1 shows that the top
Recommended publications
  • Memorandum from the Executive Secretary Dated March 21, 2018
    Republic of the Philippines DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS CENTRAL OFFICE Manila April 16, 2018 DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM ) ) ) CIRCULAR NO. __ 2_1__ ) Series of 201~ .~(,. t'f FOR / TO : Undersecretaries Assistant Secretaries Service Directors Bureau Directors Regional Directors Heads of UPMOs District Engineers This Department For information and guidance, attached is a certified copy of the Memorandum from the Executive Secretary dated March 21, 2018, re: "STRICT OBSERVANCE OF THE PHILIPPINES' ONE CHINA POLICY COMMITMENT AND UNOFFICIAL PEOPLE-TO- PEOPLE RELATIONS WITH TAIWAN." A copy of said Memorandum may also be downloaded from the DPWH website: http://dpwhweb. If an office cannot access the DPWH website, a hard copy may be obtained from the Records Management Division, HRAS, upon request. For dissemination to all concerned. B. ELI~YAP, Ph.D., CESO II Assistan~~~E~ for Support Services Encl: Memorandum from the Executive Secretary dated March 21, 2018 cc: Office of the Secretary 10.1.4 MKBA/RPE/RMB CONFIDENTIAL :In:~E~~?l 3ir-{()d I . MAR 2 6 .?~!_~_JIt .' .:: \IV fA I ~-~ •• 1~~All'f ;I TO ALL DEPARTMENT SECRETARIES AND HEADS OF A ;---'- GOVERNMENT-OWNED AND - CONTROLLED CORPORATIONS (GOCCs) AND GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS (GFls) Subject STRICT OBSERVANCE OF THE PHILIPPINES' ONE CHINA POLICY COMMITMENT AND UNOFFICIAL PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE RELATIONS WITH TAIWAN Department of Public Works and Highways Date MAR 21 2018 Office of the Secretary 1111111111111111111111111 111111II 1111 OUT8$85616 All department secretaries and heads of agencies, GOCCs and GFls are hereby directed to strictly observe and enforce the following rules and guidelines on travels to and unofficial dealings with Taiwan in line with Executive Order (EO) No.
    [Show full text]
  • Agrarian Reform in the Philippines (Newest Outline)
    Politics and Economics of Land Reform in the Philippines: a survey∗ By Nobuhiko Fuwa Chiba University, 648 Matsudo, Matsudo-City, Chiba, 271-8510 Japan [email protected] Phone/Fax: 81-47-308-8932 May, 2000 ∗ A background paper prepared for a World Bank Study, Dynamism of Rural Sector Growth: Policy Lessons from East Asian Countries. The author acknowledges helpful comments by Arsenio Balisacan. Introduction Recent developments in both theoretical and empirical economics literature have demonstrated many aspects of the negative socio-economic consequences of high inequality in the distribution of wealth. High inequality tends to hinder subsequent economic growth (e. g., Persson and Tabellini 1994?), inhibits the poor from realizing their full potential in economic activities and human development through credit constraints (e. g., Deininger and Squire 1998), encourage rent-seeking activities (e. g., Rodrik 1996), and seriously hinder the poverty reduction impact of economic growth (e. g., Ravallion and Dutt ??). The Philippines is a classic example of an economy suffering from all of these consequences. The Philippines has long been known for its high inequality in distribution of wealth and income; unlike many of its Asian neighbors characterized by relatively less inequality by international standards, the Philippine economy has often been compared to Latin American countries which are characterized by high inequality in land distribution. Partly due to its historically high inequality there has long been intermittent incidence of peasant unrest and rural insurgencies in the Philippines. As a result, the issue of land reform (or ‘agrarian reform’ as more commonly called in the Philippines, of which land reform constitutes the major part) has continuously been on political agenda at least since the early part of the 20th century; nevertheless land reform in the Philippines has been, and still is, an unfinished business.
    [Show full text]
  • Sugarcane Roadmap 2020
    SUGARCANE ROADMAP 2020 CY 2014-2015 to 2019-2020 Version SEPTEMBER 2015 Sugarcane Roadmap 2020 “A Medium-Term Plan for the Philippine Sugarcane Industry” Released by the Sugar Regulatory Administration (SRA) on September 2015 through the Support and Guidance of the Department of Agriculture (DA) and the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI). Page 2 of 309 ACKNOWLEDGMENT The Sugar Regulatory Administration acknowledges the support of the sugarcane industry stakeholders especially the MDDCs, the services and efforts of those who provided the data, prepared and developed the contents of the “Sugarcane Roadmap 2020” and those who guided and assisted during the stakeholders consultations down to the sugarcane mill district level. Rafael L. Coscolluela DTI Consultant / Facilitator USEC Adrian Cristobal Jr. Undersecretary for Industry Development & Trade Policy Group, DTI Managing Head, BOI USEC Segfredo Serrano Undersecretary of Policy, Planning, Research and Development & Regulations, DA Director Nestor Arcansalin Resource-Based Industries Department, BOI-DTI Dr. Rolando Dy and Ms. Florence Sevilla DA Consultant / Facilitator BOI Secretariat Rosemarie Ilagan Elizabeth Cristina Pahilan Mario Pocholo Orense SRA Secretariat Rosemarie S. Gumera Leilani S. Abacan Digna R. Gonzales Nina Belen Concepcion C. Ruby Magdalena D. Palanca Felina M. Quiambao Alice Maliwat Loida S. Abcede Zenaida E. Tubiera Page 3 of 309 ENDORSEMENT OF SRA TO DA & DTI Page 4 of 309 ENDORSEMENT OF SRA TO DTI ENDORSEMENT OF INDUSTRY GROUP TO DTI & DA Page 5 of 309 Page 6
    [Show full text]
  • Agrarian Reform and the Difficult Road to Peace in the Philippine Countryside
    Report December 2015 Agrarian reform and the difficult road to peace in the Philippine countryside By Danilo T. Carranza Executive summary Agrarian reform and conflict in the rural areas of the Philippines are closely intertwined. The weak government implementation of the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program, inherent loopholes in the law, strong landowner resistance, weak farmers’ organisations, and the continuing espousal by the New People’s Army of its own agrarian revolution combine to make the government’s agrarian reform programme only partially successful in breaking up land monopolies. This is why poverty is still pronounced in many rural areas. The rise of an agrarian reform movement has significantly contributed to the partial success of the government’s agrarian reform programme. But the government has not been able to tap the full potential of this movement to push for faster and more meaningful agrarian reform. The agrarian reform dynamics between pro- and anti-agrarian reform actors create social tensions that often lead to violence, of which land-rights claimants are often the victims. This is exacerbated and in many ways encouraged by the government’s failure to fulfil its obligation to protect the basic human rights of land-rights claimants. This report outlines the pace and direction of agrarian reform in the Philippines and its role in fighting poverty and promoting peace in rural areas. It emphasises the importance of reform-oriented peasant movements and more effective government implementation to the success of agrarian reform. The report also asserts the need for the government and the armed left to respect human rights and international humanitarian law in promoting the full participation of land-rights claimants in shaping and crafting public policy around land rights.
    [Show full text]
  • The Small Powers in World Politics Contours of an African-Asian Critical Realism
    African and Asian Studies �3 (�0�4) �3-3� AFRICAN AND ASIAN STUDIES brill.com/aas The Small Powers in World Politics Contours of an African-Asian Critical Realism Pak Nung Wong Department of Applied Social Studies, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China [email protected] George Klay Kieh Jr. Department of Political Science and Planning, University of West Georgia, GA, USA Abstract This paper aims to conceptualize a framework for better understanding the challenges, actions and rationales of the African and Asian small powers in the post-1989 global order. The paper will be divided into three parts. First, it will review the literature on small power/state studies. Second, following a critique of the major approaches in small power studies, we will argue for the need for a critical realist perspective to better cap- ture the relationships between domestic politics and foreign relations of the small power in Africa and Asia. Third, against the comparative trajectories in which the U.S. has attained global hegemony after 1991 and China has gradually become a great power after 2000, in light of the recent U.S. containment policy shift towards China which has stirred up versatile dynamics of East Asian small power politics, in favor of a global multi-polarity, we will highlight the foundation of our approach for building the strong small powers in terms of two main aspects of economic nationalism: resource-focused and sovereignty-asserting. Keywords African and Asian politics – African-Asian critical realism – hegemony and multi- polarity – international relations – small power politics – U.S.-China relations © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���4 | doi �0.��63/�569��08-��34��Downloaded83 from Brill.com10/02/2021 11:56:42AM via free access 14 Wong and Kieh Introduction Pressured by internal public demand, the early 1990s witnessed the Philippines successfully negotiated for the withdrawal of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • World Leaders October 2018
    Information as of 29 November 2018 has been used in preparation of this directory. PREFACE Key To Abbreviations Adm. Admiral Admin. Administrative, Administration Asst. Assistant Brig. Brigadier Capt. Captain Cdr. Commander Cdte. Comandante Chmn. Chairman, Chairwoman Col. Colonel Ctte. Committee Del. Delegate Dep. Deputy Dept. Department Dir. Director Div. Division Dr. Doctor Eng. Engineer Fd. Mar. Field Marshal Fed. Federal Gen. General Govt. Government Intl. International Lt. Lieutenant Maj. Major Mar. Marshal Mbr. Member Min. Minister, Ministry NDE No Diplomatic Exchange Org. Organization Pres. President Prof. Professor RAdm. Rear Admiral Ret. Retired Sec. Secretary VAdm. Vice Admiral VMar. Vice Marshal Afghanistan Last Updated: 20 Dec 2017 Pres. Ashraf GHANI CEO Abdullah ABDULLAH, Dr. First Vice Pres. Abdul Rashid DOSTAM Second Vice Pres. Sarwar DANESH First Deputy CEO Khyal Mohammad KHAN Second Deputy CEO Mohammad MOHAQQEQ Min. of Agriculture, Irrigation, & Livestock Nasir Ahmad DURRANI Min. of Border & Tribal Affairs Gul Agha SHERZAI Min. of Commerce & Industry Homayoun RASA Min. of Counternarcotics Salamat AZIMI Min. of Defense Tariq Shah BAHRAMI Min. of Economy Mohammad Mustafa MASTOOR Min. of Education Mohammad Ibrahim SHINWARI Min. of Energy & Water Ali Ahmad OSMANI Min. of Finance Eklil Ahmad HAKIMI Min. of Foreign Affairs Salahuddin RABBANI Min. of Hajj & Islamic Affairs Faiz Mohammad OSMANI Min. of Higher Education Najibullah Khwaja OMARI Min. of Information & Culture Mohammad Rasul BAWARI Min. of Interior Wais Ahmad BARMAK Min. of Justice Abdul Basir ANWAR Min. of Martyred, Disabled, Labor, & Social Affairs Faizullah ZAKI Min. of Mines & Petroleum Min. of Parliamentary Affairs Faruq WARDAK Min. of Public Health Ferozuddin FEROZ Min. of Public Works Yama YARI Min.
    [Show full text]
  • (EIS) for Manila Third Sewerage Project
    Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Manila Third Sewerage Project Public Disclosure Authorized Volume 4: Annex on Septage/Sludge Disposal in Lahar Area February 11, 2005 Public Disclosure Authorized (Revised Draft) Public Disclosure Authorized Manila Water Company, Inc. Manila, Philippines ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR SLUDGE/SEPTAGE-USE AS SOIL CONDITIONER FOR SUGAR CANE GROWTH IN LAHAR-LADEN AREAS Prepared by: Prepared for: 7th Floor, CLMC Building, 259-269 EDSA, Greenhills, Mandaluyong City Since 1955 in association with Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System (MWSS) Ground Floor, MWSS Bldg., Katipunan Road, Balara, Quezon City Lichel Technologies, Inc. Unit 1910 Antel Global Corporate Center #3 Doña Julia Vargas Avenue Ortigas Center, Pasig City and MAIN REPORT Rm. 1021, 10/F Cityland Shaw Tower St. Francis Street cor. Shaw Blvd., Mandaluyong City TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS PAGE VOLUME 1 – MAIN REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES–1 BACKGROUND..................................................................................................................................................I ES-2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION..................................................................................................................................I ES-3 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE CONDITIONS .........................................................................................IV ES-4 SEPTAGE AND SLUDGE CHARACTERISTICS ........................................................................................VI ES-5
    [Show full text]
  • Ensuring Services of the Pesos Secretary Silvestre H. Bello III Luzon Island Cluster Conference, LMP October 23, 2018, SMX Convention Center, Davao City
    Ensuring services of the PESOs Secretary Silvestre H. Bello III Luzon Island Cluster Conference, LMP October 23, 2018, SMX Convention Center, Davao City DAR Secretary John Castriciones, DSWD Secretary Rolando Bautista, DILG Secretary Eduardo Ano, Secretary Bong Go, Secretary Francis Tolentino, Secretary General Gene Mamondiong, former Senator Jinggoy Estrada, Ilocos Norte Governor Imee Marcos, the other provincial governors present, the municipal chief executives, guests, my co-workers in government, ladies and gentlemen, good morning! Allow me to congratulate the distinguished men and women of the League of Municipalities of the Philippines on your Luzon Island Cluster Conference. Cheers to National President Mayor Ma. Fe “Bubut” Brondial, Vice President Mayor Maria Angela Garcia and Secretary General Mayor Abraham “Jess” Burnham. This assembly enhances the potentials of our local chief executives. I am convinced no less that ang “Kaunlaran ng Bansa, sa Bayan Nagmumula.” I am delighted to be part of this assembly because this is an opportunity for us to bring across labor and employment programs that are beneficial to our municipalities. One such important program is the Public Employment Service Office or the PESO. Republic Act 10691, the amended PESO Act of 1991 was enacted in October 2015, pursuant to the policy of the State to promote full employment in the country. This was authored by the then Chair of the Senate Committee on Labor and Employment, Senator Jinggoy Estrada, who happens to be with us today. Ito ang mahalagang legacy ni Senator Jinggoy sa ating mga LGUs. The Department of Labor and Employment has embarked on several initiatives to address unemployment and underemployment.
    [Show full text]
  • Parallel Report
    Parallel Report On t he Occasion of t he Review of t he ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Philippines Com bined 5t h and 6t h Periodic Report s t o t he UN CESCR at t he 59t h Session Sept em ber 2016 FIAN Philippines 91 Madasalin St reet , Sikat una Village, Quezon Cit y - Philippines ht t p:/ / w w w.fianphilippines.org/ FIAN Int ernat ional PO Box 10 22 43 69012 Heidelberg - Germ any w w w.fian.org Cover phot o: Beringer, Ast rud. "Hacienda Mat ias peasant s finally harvest ing peacefully". July 2015. Sept em ber 2016 ACRONYMS 4Ps Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program A&F Agriculture and Fisheries AFMA Agriculture and Fisheries Modernization Act A.O. Administrative Order ARBO Agrarian reform Beneficiaries Organizations ARMM Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao CADT Certificate of Ancestral Domain Title CARL Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law CARP Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program CARPER Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program Extension with Reform CESCR Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights CCT Conditional Cash Transfer CEDAW Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women CEO Chief Executive Officer CHR Commission on Human Rights CLOA Certificate of Land Ownership Award CRAF Commission on the Right to Adequate Food CRC Convention on the Rights of the Child CRPD Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities CSOs Civil Society Organizations DAR Department of Agrarian Reform DARAB DAR Adjudication Board DBM Department of Budget and Management DENR Department of Environment and Natural Resources DSWD Department
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila EN BANC
    Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila EN BANC HACIENDA LUISITA, G.R. No. 171101 INCORPORATED, Petitioner, Present: LUISITA INDUSTRIAL PARK CORONA, C.J., CORPORATION and RIZAL CARPIO, COMMERCIAL BANKING VELASCO, JR., CORPORATION, LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, Petitioners-in-Intervention, BRION, PERALTA, - versus - BERSAMIN, DEL CASTILLO, PRESIDENTIAL AGRARIAN ABAD, REFORM COUNCIL; SECRETARY VILLARAMA, JR., NASSER PANGANDAMAN OF THE PEREZ, DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN MENDOZA, and REFORM; ALYANSA NG MGA SERENO, MANGGAGAWANG BUKID NG REYES, HACIENDA LUISITA, RENE PERLAS-BERNABE, JJ. GALANG, NOEL MALLARI, and JULIO SUNIGA[1] and his SUPERVISORY GROUP OF THE HACIENDA LUISITA, INC. and WINDSOR ANDAYA, Promulgated: Respondents. November 22, 2011 x-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x R E S O L U T I O N VELASCO, JR., J.: For resolution are the (1) Motion for Clarification and Partial Reconsideration dated July 21, 2011 filed by petitioner Hacienda Luisita, Inc. (HLI); (2) Motion for Partial Reconsideration dated July 20, 2011 filed by public respondents Presidential Agrarian Reform Council (PARC) and Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR); (3) Motion for Reconsideration dated July 19, 2011 filed by private respondent Alyansa ng mga Manggagawang Bukid sa Hacienda Luisita (AMBALA); (4)Motion for Reconsideration dated July 21, 2011 filed by respondent-intervenor Farmworkers Agrarian Reform Movement, Inc. (FARM); (5) Motion for Reconsideration dated July 21, 2011 filed by private respondents Noel Mallari, Julio Suniga, Supervisory Group of Hacienda Luisita, Inc. (Supervisory Group) and Windsor Andaya (collectively referred to as “Mallari, et al.”); and (6) Motion for Reconsideration dated July 22, 2011 filed by private respondents Rene Galang and AMBALA.[2] On July 5, 2011, this Court promulgated a Decision[3] in the above- captioned case, denying the petition filed by HLI and affirming Presidential Agrarian Reform Council (PARC) Resolution No.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Land Rights and Land Governance in Eight Asian Countries
    State of Land Rights and Land Governance in Eight Asian Countries Forty Years after the World Conference on Agrarian Reform and Rural Development Asian NGO Coalition for Agrarian Reform and Rural Development (ANGOC) Founded in 1979, the Asian NGO Coalition for Agrarian Reform and Rural Development (ANGOC) is a regional association of national and regional networks of civil society organizations (CSOs) in Asia actively engaged in promoting food sovereignty, land rights and agrarian reform, sustainable agriculture, participatory governance, and rural development. ANGOC member networks and partners work in 10 Asian countries together with 3,000 CSOs and community-based organizations (CBOs). ANGOC actively engages in joint field programs and policy discussions with national governments, intergovernmental organizations (IGOs), and international financial institutions (IFIs). The complexity of Asian realities and diversity of CSOs highlight the need for a development leadership to service the poor of Asia—providing a forum for articulation of their needs and aspirations as well as expression of Asian values and perspectives. ANGOC is a member of the Global Land Tool Network (GLTN), Global Forum on Agricultural Research (GFAR), Indigenous Peoples’ and Community Conserved Areas and Territories (ICCA) Consortium and the International Land Coalition (ILC). Land Watch Asia (LWA) is a regional campaign to ensure that access to land, agrarian reform and sustainable development for the rural poor are addressed in national and regional development agenda. The campaign involves civil society organizations in Bangladesh, Cambodia, India, Indonesia, Kyrgyzstan, Nepal, Pakistan and the Philippines. LWA aims to take stock of significant changes in the policy and legal environments; undertake strategic national and regional advocacy activities on access to land; jointly develop approaches and tools; and, encourage the sharing of experiences on coalition-building and actions on land rights issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Ratio: Official Land Redistribution Data in Search of Corroborating Evidence
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive ‘Farm holding redistribution’ ratio: Official land redistribution data in search of corroborating evidence Dy, Kenneth Academia Sinica – Institute of Economics 8 July 2021 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/109029/ MPRA Paper No. 109029, posted 04 Aug 2021 03:17 UTC ‘Farm holding redistribution’ ratio: Official land redistribution data in search of corroborating evidence Dy, Kenneth Bicol aAcademia Sinica – Institute of Economics Abstract The accomplishments of the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) have been criticised for inaccurately portraying the land redistribution in the Philippines. Evidence has largely been anecdotal in nature. Examining the breakdown of the accomplishments as to region and type may reveal several important findings that aggregate accomplishment numbers conceal. But cross-validating official redistribu- tion results with data from a different government agency offers an even more unique way to prove or disprove the claims of agrarian reform authorities. This study com- plements earlier investigative studies by examining whether the decennial Census of Agriculture and Fisheries can offer corroboratory or contradictory evidence to pub- lished accomplishments. A ‘farm holding redistribution’ ratio and ‘land use change’ ratio were computed for this purpose, and analysed together with regional average farm size, farm holding Gini, tenure arrangements across time. Furthermore, it looks at the change in farmland distribution before and during the CARP implementation. After scrutinising the official accomplishments and CAF data, the findings reveal that indeed, CARP accomplishments failed to translate into landownership for small farm operators. However, there is a dim reflection of achieving its stated goals in regions that implemented more compulsory acquisition and in continuing past programs prior to the enactment of CARP.
    [Show full text]