Climatic Conditions in the Klamath Basin of Southern Oregon And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Climatic Conditions in the Klamath Basin of Southern Oregon And Projected Future Conditions and Sector Background Information for the Deschutes River Basin of Central Oregon March 2011 Page 1 Projected Future Conditions and Sector Background Information for the Deschutes River Basin of Central Oregon Geos Institute Brian R. Barr, Alan R. P. Journet, PhD, and Jessica L. Leonard Support for this project was provided by: Bella Vista Foundation Brainerd Foundations Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council Esri Conservation Grant s Program Headwaters Economics USDA Forest Service Mapped Atmosphere-Plant-Soil-Systems Team 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 2 Models and their limitations 3 Global climate change projections 5 Climate projections for Deschutes Basin 6 Temperature 8 Precipitation 11 Snowpack and streamflow 15 Vegetation, wildfire, and carbon storage 16 Sector background 20 Natural systems 22 Populations 23 Economics and education 23 Infrastructure 25 Public health 26 Conclusion 28 Literature Cited 29 INTRODUCTION The Deschutes Basin is one of the Deschutes Basin and its residents for largest river basins in Oregon, short- and long-term changes. draining 15,000 square miles and encompassing Crook, Deschutes, and This report is the first step in the Jefferson counties and portions of ClimateWise® process. It provides eight other counties. The basin’s rich baseline information going into a history, culture, and natural resources workshop that will focus on contribute to the quality of life for identifying vulnerable resources and residents. Changes to this region are populations and developing strategies underway due to climate change, to reduce those vulnerabilities and population growth, and shifts in the allow for continued quality of life for economy. The ClimateWise® process residents. By developing cohesive was created to help communities strategies across both natural and develop strategies that increase their socioeconomic systems, this process resilience in the face of inevitable results in increased collaboration and impacts of climate change. communication within the region. Strategies developed in this process Climatic changes are underway across are expected to be ecologically sound, Oregon and are likely to increase in supporting important natural services the coming decades. These changes (e.g., water filtration, flood abatement, are likely to include more intense livestock forage, fisheries, recreational storms and floods, extended drought, opportunity, etc.). increased wildfire, and more heat waves. These will affect native species, Many of the impacts of climate change agriculture, forestry, and human are inevitable due to current levels of health. Communities will need to plan greenhouse gas emissions already in for such changes to prevent the atmosphere. Preparing for these potentially catastrophic consequences impacts to reduce their severity is and/or declines in their quality of life. called “adaptation” (see box below). Preventing even more severe impacts This report provides (1) community by reducing future emissions is called members and decision-makers with “mitigation.” local climate change projections, presented in a way to help make informed, long-term planning MITIGATION: reducing the severity of decisions and (2) background climate change by reducing heat-traping information on socioeconomic and emissions and increasing their removal natural systems, allowing readers to from the atmosphere identify populations and resources that might be most vulnerable to ADAPTATION: reducing the vulnerability impacts. By identifying vulnerabilities, of natural and human systems to the local leaders and experts can develop impacts of climate change sound strategies for preparing the Page 2 MODELS AND THEIR LIMITATIONS Climate change and its associated MIROC (from Japan), and CSIRO (from impacts mean the future is no longer Australia). These models include expected to resemble the past. To specific variables needed to run a determine what conditions we might vegetation model. Discussing the expect in the future, climatologists specific inputs is beyond the scope of created models based on physical, this report, but they include such chemical, and biological processes variables as greenhouse gas that form the earth’s climate system. emissions, air and ocean currents, ice These models vary in their level of and snow cover, plant growth, detail and the assumptions upon particulate matter, and many others which they are constructed. These (Randall et al. 2007). differences stem from the range of Model outputs were converted to local understanding of some of the Earth’s scales using fine-scale, historic data on processes and feedback systems. temperature and precipitation Modeling differences result in patterns. The climate model output variation among the model outputs was applied to the MC1 vegetation and the future scenarios indicated model (Bachelet et al. 2001), which (see insert “Climate Projection vs. provided data on natural vegetation Prediction vs. Scenario” to the right). types that future climatic conditions Most climate models project the might support, biomass consumed by future climate at global scales. For wildfire, and carbon sequestration local managers and policymakers to potential. make decisions, however, they need information about how climate change Climate projection will impact their specific, local area. A model-derived estimate of the The MAPPS (Mapped Atmosphere- future climate. Plant-Soil-System) Team as the USDA Pacific Northwest Research Station Climate prediction or forecast adjusted global model output to a A projection that is highly certain local scale (8 km x 8 km). based on agreement among multiple models. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) uses numerous Scenario models to make global climate projections. The models are developed A coherent and plausible description by different institutions and countries of a possible future state. A scenario and have slightly different inputs or may be developed using climate assumptions. The MAPSS Team chose projections as the basis, but three global climate models that offer additional information, including a range of projections for temperature baseline conditions and decision and precipitation. These three models pathways, is needed to develop a are Hadley (HADCM, from the UK), scenario. Page 3 The utility of the results presented in Projection Certainty this report lies in their ability to help communities envision what the HIGH: conditions and landscape may look Higher temperatures – Greater like in the future, including the concentrations of greenhouse gases trap magnitude and direction of change. more heat. Measured warming tracks Because model outputs vary in their model projections. degree of certainty, they are considered projections rather than Lower snowpack – Higher temperatures predictions (see insert on previous cause a shift from snow to rain at lower page). Some model outputs, such as elevations and cause earlier snow melt at temperature, have greater certainty higher elevations. than others, such as vegetation type (see insert to the left). Shifting distributions of plants & animals – Relationships between species Much of the uncertainty associated distributions and climate are well with model projections arises due to documented. uncertainty in future greenhouse gas emissions. We urge the reader to keep in mind that results are presented MEDIUM: here to explore the types of changes More severe storms – Changes to storm we may see; actual future conditions patterns will be regionally variable. may be different from those depicted in this report. Changes in precipitation – Current models show wide disagreement on Uncertainty associated with precipitation patterns, but the model projections of future conditions projections converge in some locations. should not be used as a reason to delay action on climate change. Wildfire patterns – The relationship between fire and temperature has been The likelihood that future conditions well documented, but other components will resemble historic conditions is also play a role (such as vegetation, below). very low,. Managers and policy makers are encouraged to begin to plan for an era of change, even if the LOW: precise trajectory or rate of such Changes in vegetation – Vegetation change is uncertain. may take decades or centuries to keep pace with changes in climate. Page 4 GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE PROJECTIONS The IPCC (2007) and the U.S. Global however, provide some of the warmer Change Research Program (2009) projections for the Pacific Northwest. agree that the evidence is Reducing and stabilizing greenhouse “unequivocal”, the Earth’s atmosphere gas (GHG) concentrations at lower and oceans are warming due primarily levels will take decades (even with to human activities (e.g., CO2, immediate, drastic emission methane, other greenhouse gas reductions) due to their long-lived emissions, and deforestation). presence in the atmosphere. Reducing Average global air temperature has emission of these gases is vital to already increased by 1.4° F and is preventing the earth’s climate system expected to increase by 3.5 - 11.5° F from reaching a critical tipping point, within the next century (Figure 1). which may lead to sudden and irreversible climate changes. While The IPCC emission scenario used in mitigation is the ultimate remedy, this assessment was the A2 model planning for the inevitable local (Nakinovic et al. 2000), often referred climatic consequences gives residents to as the “business-as-usual” of the Deschutes Basin
Recommended publications
  • 2019 Media Kit
    2019 MEDIA KIT 2019 MEDIA KIT MAILING ADDRESS 541.948.5200 Oregon Media [email protected] 70 SW Century Drive WWW.OREGON-MEDIA.COM Suite 100-474 Bend, Oregon 97702 2019 MEDIA KIT reach The official Central Oregon Visitors Guide is the region’s most widely circulated promotional publication, reaching more than 402,500 readers through a $2.5 million, nationwide marketing campaign and exclusive placement in resorts and destinations throughout Central Oregon. Distribution • 115,000 distributed annually. Exclusive collateral piece of COVA’s annual marketing, promotion, sales and public relations Of f icial • campaigns. • Travel Oregon’s official fulfillment piece for any inquiry into Central Oregon. VISITORS Placed exclusively in more than 4,000 resort units, hotel rooms, vacation homes, condominiums GUIDE • and bed-and-breakfasts throughout Central Oregon. Sent to more than 90 visitor centers, chambers and state welcome centers, more than 40 AAA • offices throughout Oregon-Washington-Idaho, Nevada, California and Texas. CROOKED RIVER RANCH · LA PINE · MADRAS Available at both the Redmond Airport and Portland International Airport. · MAUPIN · PRINEVILLE • · REDMOND · SISTERS Showcased in all COVA press kits provided to travel editors and at all industry and consumer · WARM SPRINGS • travel shows and sales events. The COVA website VisitCentralOregon.com is receiving nearly 1 million unique visitor • views annually and features a digital version of the COVA guide with links to each partner stakeholder and advertiser. MAILING ADDRESS 541.948.5200 Oregon Media [email protected] 70 SW Century Drive WWW.OREGON-MEDIA.COM Suite 100-474 Bend, Oregon 97702 2019 MEDIA KIT audience By profiling a perfect combination of adventurous recreation opportunities and wonderful retreats, the official Central Oregon Visitors Guide impacts local and out-of-town readers who enjoy a diverse range of lifestyles.
    [Show full text]
  • Deschutes County Historical Highlights
    Deschutes County Historical Highlights First white men to enter Central Oregon: Reed and Seton from the 1813 American Pacific Fur Company. Fremont Exploration: lead by John C. Fremont and his party which 1843 included Kit Carson, Thomas "Bad hand" Fitzpatrick, and Billy Chinnook. 1848 Oregon Territory created. Clark Party camps on the bank of the Deschutes River near the future 1851 townsite of Bend. 1859 Oregon gains Statehood. Felix Scott Jr., Marion Scott, John Craig and Robert Millican bring 900 1862 head of Cattle into Central Oregon and spend the winter here. Reputed to be the first white men to do so. William P. Vandvert settles on the Deschutes River south of present site of 1874 Sunriver. 1877 Farewell Bend Ranch established by John Y. Todd. 1878 Tetherow Crossing built (oldest home standing in Deschutes County). 1882 Crook County formed from Wasco County. 1886 Post Office established at Farewell Bend Ranch by John Sisemore. Passage of Carey Act which allow free land to those who irrigate it, opens 1894 the high desert to development. Columbia Southern Railroad reaches the City of Shaniko. 1900 Alexander M. Drake arrives in the future town of Bend. City of Sisters platted. 1901 Construction begins on Pilot Butte Canal. Name of post office changed temporally from "Bend" to "Deschutes" 1902 Millard Triplett constructs Bend’s first frame building. 1903 Bend population reaches approximately 250 people. Tumalo platted as Laidlaw. 1904 Water turned on in the Pilot Butte Canal. First phone lines laid between Bend and Prineville. City of Redmond platted. 1905 City of Bend officially incorporated with 500 people (104 votes in favor - 3 in opposition).
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation in the Intermountain Region Part 1
    United States Department of Agriculture Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation in the Intermountain Region Part 1 Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Report Service Research Station RMRS-GTR-375 April 2018 Halofsky, Jessica E.; Peterson, David L.; Ho, Joanne J.; Little, Natalie, J.; Joyce, Linda A., eds. 2018. Climate change vulnerability and adaptation in the Intermountain Region. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-375. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Part 1. pp. 1–197. Abstract The Intermountain Adaptation Partnership (IAP) identified climate change issues relevant to resource management on Federal lands in Nevada, Utah, southern Idaho, eastern California, and western Wyoming, and developed solutions intended to minimize negative effects of climate change and facilitate transition of diverse ecosystems to a warmer climate. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service scientists, Federal resource managers, and stakeholders collaborated over a 2-year period to conduct a state-of-science climate change vulnerability assessment and develop adaptation options for Federal lands. The vulnerability assessment emphasized key resource areas— water, fisheries, vegetation and disturbance, wildlife, recreation, infrastructure, cultural heritage, and ecosystem services—regarded as the most important for ecosystems and human communities. The earliest and most profound effects of climate change are expected for water resources, the result of declining snowpacks causing higher peak winter
    [Show full text]
  • What Climate Change Means for Oregon and the Northwest
    THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE May 6, 2014 FACT SHEET: What Climate Change Means for Oregon and the Northwest Today, the Obama Administration released the third U.S. National Climate Assessment—the most comprehensive scientific assessment ever generated of climate change and its impacts across every region of America and major sectors of the U.S. economy. The findings in this National Climate Assessment underscore the need for urgent action to combat the threats from climate change, protect American citizens and communities today, and build a sustainable future for our kids and grandkids. The National Climate Assessment is a key deliverable of President Obama’s Climate Action Plan to cut carbon pollution, prepare America’s communities for climate-change impacts, and lead international efforts to address this global challenge. Importantly, the plan acknowledges that even as we act to reduce the greenhouse-gas pollution that is driving climate change, we must also empower the Nation’s states, communities, businesses, and decision makers with the information they need prepare for climate impacts already underway. The Obama Administration has already taken a number of steps to deliver on that commitment to states, regions, and communities across America. In the past year alone, these efforts have included: establishing a Task Force of State, Local, and Tribal Leaders on Climate Preparedness and Resilience to advise the Administration on how the Federal Government can respond to the needs of communities nationwide that are dealing with the impacts of climate change; launching a Climate Data Initiative to bring together extensive open government data with strong commitments from the private and philanthropic sectors to develop planning and resilience tools for communities; and establishing seven new “climate hubs” across the country to help farmers and ranchers adapt their operations to a changing climate.
    [Show full text]
  • Charter Review Report
    BEND CITY GOVERNANCE COMMUNITY OPINIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON CHARTER REVIEW —Feb. 1, 2017— For more information contact: Bend 2030 Executive Director Erin Foote Morgan 541-420-8603 [email protected] Bend Chamber of Commerce Executive Vice President for Community Affairs Jamie Christman 541-382-3221 [email protected] City Club of Central Oregon Executive Director Joey Drucker 541-633-7163 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements 3 Report Overview 4 Forum One: The Issues 5 Forum Two: Public Input 10 Interactive posters 11 Free responses 15 Post-it Note exercises 21 Appendix Elected mayor comparisons across Oregon 22 Ward system comparisons across Oregon 23 Council pay and audit policies across Oregon 24 History of Bend governance structure 25 Citizen presentation to Bend City Council 26 COAR letter of support for charter review committee 40 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The 2017-2019 Bend City Council Casey Roats, Mayor Barb Campbell Sally Russell, Mayor Pro Tem Justin Livingston Bruce Abernethy Bill Moseley Nathan Boddie Charter Review Citizen Presentation Committee Jack Farley Don Leonard Bill Galaway Kathleen Meehan Coop Brent Landels Richard Ross Bend Livability Project Steering Committee Seth Anderson Richard Ross Joey Drucker Sara Q. Thompson Kim Gammond Judy Watts DeeDee Johnson Westin Webre Susanne Julber Bend Livability Project Sponsors Amplion Kollective Ascent Architecture Lead Method Bank of the Cascades Leapology BBT Louis Capozzi Bend 2030 Magento Bend Broadband Manzama Bend Chamber Miller Lumber Bend Radio Group
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Environmental Justice in Oregon's Climate Change Adaptation Planning
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Malia T. Losordo for the degree of Master of Science in Water Resources Policy and Management presented on March 13, 2018. Title: The Role of Environmental Justice in Oregon's Climate Change Adaptation Planning Abstract approved: ______________________________________________________ Mary Santelmann Adell Amos Oregon has already experienced the impacts of climate change, and these impacts are expected to become increasingly severe and varied. In response, the State of Oregon has taken a number of actions to adapt to changing conditions, including coordinated planning approaches to climate change adaptation. However, climate change adaptation actions can exacerbate existing inequities when impacted communities do not participate or are not considered in the decision- making process. Oregon's Environmental Justice Law, ORS 182.535 et seq., was enacted to ensure that natural resource agencies integrate environmental justice principles—such as the equitable distribution of environmental burdens and benefits and meaningful involvement of impacted communities—into the decision-making process for every action, including climate change adaptation. This paper explores the experiences of some natural resource agencies' with applying Oregon's environmental justice law to climate change adaptation planning. Research questions addressed were (1) what role do environmental justice principles and environmental justice law play in and to what extent do they shape state-level adaptation efforts? and (2) what are potential barriers to integration of environmental justice into climate adaptation efforts? Document analysis and semi-structured interviews (n=19) were conducted to (1) describe the role that environmental justice principles and the environmental justice law played in three different state-level adaptation approaches and (2) identify perceived barriers to greater integration of environmental justice into these efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Confronting Climate Change in Oregon
    FACT SHEET Confronting Climate Change in Oregon Current Impacts and Future Risks HIGHLIGHTS From its windswept Pacific coastline to its sprawling high desert, Oregon is a Climate change is being felt in the Beaver landscape of powerful rivers, abundant waterfalls, dense evergreen forests, and State as record-breaking wildfires destroy rugged mountains. The state’s natural resources are critical to Oregon’s econo- my—supporting timber production, agriculture, and commercial fisheries, and a communities and forests, declining vibrant tourism industry that contributes nearly $10 billion annually to the state’s snowpack and earlier snowmelt in the economy (Oregon Tourism Commission 2015). This rich ecology and thriving mountains jeopardize summer water economy is also vulnerable to the impacts of global warming. supplies, and shellfish hatcheries fail Oregon residents, like people across the country, are seeing impacts from because of an acidifying ocean. global warming resulting from the buildup of heat-trapping emissions in the atmosphere. With the Pacific Northwest having warmed by at least 1.3°F since Climate models project temperatures in the 1895, climate change is already being felt in the Beaver State (Dalton, Mote, and Snover 2013). Shellfish hatcheries are failing because of an acidifying ocean, re- Pacific Northwest to increase between 3°F cord-breaking wildfires are destroying forests and communities, and declining and 9°F by the end of this century, with snowpack and earlier snowmelt in the mountains are jeopardizing summer water the range depending on whether we supplies. reduce or continue to raise our global Unless we make deep and swift cuts in heat-trapping emissions, future chang- heat-trapping emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Multi-Proxy Investigation Into Ancient Climate and Topography of the Pacific Northwest, USA
    Portland State University PDXScholar Geology Faculty Publications and Presentations Geology 3-26-2021 Molecules to Mountains: A Multi-Proxy Investigation into Ancient Climate and Topography of the Pacific Northwest, USA Alexander McLean Portland State University, [email protected] John Bershaw Portland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/geology_fac Part of the Geology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details McLean, A., & Bershaw, J. (2021). Molecules to Mountains: A Multi-Proxy Investigation Into Ancient Climate and Topography of the Pacific Northwest, USA. Frontiers in Earth Science, 9, 624961. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.624961 This Citation is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geology Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. PERSPECTIVE published: 26 March 2021 doi: 10.3389/feart.2021.624961 Molecules to Mountains: A Multi-Proxy Investigation Into Ancient Climate and Topography of the Pacific Northwest, USA Alexander McLean* and John Bershaw Department of Geology, Portland State University, Portland, OR, United States We characterize the topographic evolution of the Pacific Northwest, United States, during the Cenozoic. New paleosol carbonate stable isotope (δ18O) results from central Oregon are presented, along with published proxy data, including fossil teeth, smectites, and carbonate concretions. We interpret a polygenetic history of Cascade Mountain topographic uplift along-strike, characterized by: 1) Steady uplift of the Washington Cascades through the Cenozoic due long-term arc rotation and shortening against a Canadian buttress, and 2) Uplift of the Oregon Cascades to similar-to-modern elevations Edited by: by the late Oligocene, followed by topographic stagnation as extension developed into the Alexis Licht, Neogene.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Palouse and Canyon Grasslands: Putting Back the Missing Pieces
    TECHNICAL BULLETIN NO. 01-15 IDAHO BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT AUGUST 2001 RESTORING PALOUSE AND CANYON GRASSLANDS: PUTTING BACK THE MISSING PIECES Compiled and Edited by Bertie J. Weddell Restoring Palouse and Canyon Grasslands: Putting Back the Missing Pieces A. Restoration of Palouse and Canyon Grasslands: A Review. B.J. Weddell and J. Lichthardt B. Soil Biological fingerprints from Meadow Steppe and Steppe Communities with Native and Non-native Vegetation. B.J. Weddell, P. Frohne, and A.C. Kennedy C. Experimental Test of Microbial Biocontrol of Cheatgrass. B.J. Weddell, A. Kennedy, P. Frohne, and S. Higgins D. Experimental Test of the Effects of Erosion Control Blankets on the Survival of Bluebunch Wheatgrass Plugs. B.J. Weddell Complied and edited by Bertie J. Weddell dRaba Consulting 1415 NW State Street Pullman, WA 99163 March 2000 for the Bureau of Land Management Cottonwood Field Office Route 3, Box 181 Cottonwood, ID 83522 Table of Contents Contributors ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- iii Acknowledgments ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- iv Overview --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- v 1. Restoration of Palouse and Canyon Grasslands: A Review, B.J. Weddell and J. Lichthardt -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1.1 Introduction ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Adapting to Climate Change on the Oregon Coast
    ADAPTING TO CLIMATE CHANGE ON THE OREGON COAST A CITIZEN’S GUIDE A PROJECT OF THE Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition A Citizen’s Guide to Climate Change on the Oregon Coast March 2015 Copyright © 2015 by Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition LINKS TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: This Citizen’s Guide is intended to serve as an introduction to the vast amount of information available on topics related to climate change effects on the Oregon coast, as well as a sourcebook for citizens interested in helping their communities to begin the long process of adapting to these effects. In publishing the Guide, the Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition anticipates that most readers will access and read it online with Internet access or in an electronic format, such as a PDF, which will enable easy access to additional information. The Guide has two parts: Part One, A Primer, presents an overview of the topics pertaining to adapting to climate change on the Oregon coast. The Primer contains numerous embedded hyperlinks to enable readers to click directly to external websites or online PDF documents for additional information. Part Two, Scientific and Policy Considerations, is a set of papers written by Oregon experts in science, law, and policy. These papers, commissioned by Oregon Shores for this project in 2012, also contain references to further information. Although readers of a paper version of the Guide will be unable to directly link to external documents, a list of those external web-based sources at the end of Part One will enable the reader to enter those Internet addresses directly via a keyboard at their convenience.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate and Health in Oregon 2020 Report
    Climate and Health in Oregon 2020 Report PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION Contents » Contents ...............................................................................................................2 » Executive summary .............................................................................................3 » Opening letter from Pat Allen and Rachael Banks ..............................................6 » Introduction ..........................................................................................................7 » Racial inequity and climate justice ...................................................................13 » Cross-cutting impacts .......................................................................................17 » Economic instability, impacts to workers and food insecurity .............................................19 » Mental health, substance use and violence .......................................................................24 » Housing, displacement and migration ................................................................................26 » Climate hazards .................................................................................................28 » Storms, floods, landslides and sea-level rise .....................................................................30 » Wildfire ............................................................................................................................32 » Infectious disease ............................................................................................................34
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Central Oregon Economic Profile
    ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOR CENTRAL OREGON 2020 CENTRAL OREGON ECONOMIC PROFILE 705 SW BONNETT WAY EDCOINFO.COM SUITE 1000 #EDCOINFO BEND, OR 97702 @EDCOINFO 541.388.3236 Table of Contents Welcome........................................................................................................ 2 Central Oregon Overview................................................................................ 3 Population..................................................................................................... 4 Move.............................................................................................................. 6 Relocate / Expand.......................................................................................... 7 Start................................................................................................................ 8 Entrepreneurial Support................................................................................. 9 Grow............................................................................................................... 10 Workforce...................................................................................................... 11 Delivering What Is Expected......................................................................... 12 Transportation............................................................................................... 13 Services / Infrastructure................................................................................ 14 Top Employers..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]