LegalMetric Individual Judge Report Judge Sue Lewis Robinson Patent Cases January 2000 to September 2017

This report contains confidential and proprietary information of LegalMetric, Inc. Use of this information by anyone other than the purchaser or, if the purchaser is a law firm, the purchaser's client, or disclosure of this information to persons other than the purchaser or, if the purchaser is a law firm, the purchaser's client, without the consent of LegalMetric, Inc. is prohibited.

The information contained in this report is obtained from the official docket records of the federal courts. No attempt has been made to correct that data. For example, cases may be misclassified in the official docket records. In addition, cases are classified only by the primary cause of action. Cases having multiple causes of action are analyzed only under the primary cause of action identitied on the official court docket.

LegalMetric, Inc. is not a law firm, does not provide legal advice, and is not engaged in the practice of law. No attorney-client relationship exists between LegalMetric, Inc. and any user of its products. LegalMetric provides statistical and analytical information to anyone who desires to purchase that information. Any purchaser of LegalMetric products who wants legal advice should hire an attorney.

1 Overview: Total Cases and Judgments Judge Robinson was appointed to the bench on November 18, 1991. This judge has been assigned 1408 patent cases. Of these, 1388 cases have been terminated. There have been judgments in favor of a party (includes consent and default judgments) in 201 case(s). The patent owner prevailed in 42.5% of these cases (while the accused infringer prevailed in 57.5% of these cases). (Note: In those instances where the judge previously served as a magistrate, earlier rulings issued while the judge was a magistrate are included in this report.)

Nation Robinson Total

Overall Win Rate 53.5 42.5 Overall Win Rate 42.5 Contested Win Rate 22.0 31.2 Contested Win Rate 31.2 Trial Win Rate 63.1 54.5 Trial Win Rate 54.5 Pendency (All Cases) 12.3 15.0 Pendency (All Cases) 15.0 Judgment Pendency 21.5 26.9 Judgment Pendency 26.9 Contested Pendency 27.1 30.9 Contested Pendency 30.9 Trial Pendency 37.5 36.4 Trial Pendency 36.4

Color Scheme: Red in the table above indicates a win rate more than 10% more favorable to the ACCUSED INFRINGER than the average, or a pendency time at least 6 months SLOWER than the national average. Yellow indicates a win rate from 0% to 10% more favorable to the ACCUSED INFRINGER than the national average, or a pendency time from 0 to 6 months SLOWER than the national average. Bright (lime) green indicates a win rate from 0% to 10% more favorable to the PATENTEE than the national average, or a pendency time from 0 to 6 months FASTER than the national average. And dark green indicates a win rate more than 10% more favorable to the PATENTEE than the national average, or a pendency time over 6 months FASTER than the national average.

The number of patent cases assigned to Number of Cases Filed, by Year 280 Judge Robinson by 260 year is shown in the 238 240 chart to the right. 197 Note that this includes 200 cases filed in previous years and reassigned 160 to this judge, where 120 applicable. 96

Number of Cases 83 80 67 61 47 40 40 39 38 41 40 35 31 34 34 21 6 0 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016

2 Number of Cases Decided, by Year The number of patent cases decided by 320 287 Judge Robinson by 280 year is shown in the

240 chart to the left. This 206 can include cases 200 187 decided earlier which

160 are subsequently assigned to this judge 120 106

Number of Cases 89 for post-decision 75 80 67 rulings. 49 37 38 39 37 40 30 32 34 33 28 14 0 0 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016

One- and Five-Year Percentage of Cases for This Judge Fraction of Cases Assigned to 18 This Judge, By Court: The fraction of cases assigned to 16 this judge by court (and division 14 if applicable) is shown in the chart to the left and in the table 12 below. The figures are further 10 Cases Filed in Last Five broken out by percentage of Years cases filed in the previous five 8 16.0 Cases Filed in Last Year years and by percentage of

6 cases filed in the previous year.

4 Percentage of Total Cases Filed 2 2.2 0 Wilmington Court

Total

Percentage of Cases Filed in Percentage of Cases Filed in Last Five Years Last Year

Total 16.0 2.2

Wilmington 16.0 2.2

3 Patent Case Outcomes for Judge Robinson: The chart below shows the breakdown, by case outcome, for closed cases of this judge.

Case Outcomes for Judge Bankruptcy Stay 0.4% Want of Prosecution Bench Trial 1.9% 2.9% Confirmation of Arbitration Award 0.1% Consent Judgment 3.4% Consolidated 4.4% Involuntary Dismissal 1.7% Judgment as a Matter of Law 0.1% Jury Verdict 2.7% Lack of Jurisdiction 1.6% Voluntary Dismissal MDL Transfer 73.7% 0.6%

Total

Total 1388

Bankruptcy Stay 6

Bench Trial 40

Confirmation of Arbitration 1

Consent Judgment 47

Consolidated 61

Involuntary Dismissal 23

Judgment as a Matter of L 1

Jury Verdict 37

Lack of Jurisdiction 22

MDL Transfer 9

Other Settlement 3

Other Termination 15

Remand to State Court 2

Summary Judgment 48

Transfer 23

Voluntary Dismissal 1023

Want of Prosecution 27

4 Overview: Contested Judgments There have been 154 contested judgments in these cases (does not include consent and default judgments). The patent owner prevailed in 31.2% of these cases, while the accused infringer prevailed in 68.8% of these cases. These figures are compared to the corresponding nationwide numbers below. In addition, the patentee contested win rate for the judge by year is shown in the second chart below.

Contested Win Rates, Judge v. Nation 80 78.0

70 68.8

60

50

Nation 40 Robinson 31.2 Percentage 30 22.0 20

10

0 Patent Owner Accused Infringer

Contested Win Rate by Year 70

60

50

40

30

20

10 Contested Win Rate (Percentage)

0

2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2,001.00 2,003.00 2,005.00 2,007.00 2,009.00 2,011.00 2,013.00 2,015.00 2,017.00 Year of Decision

5 Overview: Trials There have been 77 terminations by trial in these cases (includes both bench and jury trials). The patent owner prevailed in 54.5% of these case, while the accused infringer prevailed in 45.5% of these cases. Trials on which judgment has not been entered are not included in these figures. These figures are compared to the corresponding nationwide numbers below.

Trial Win Rates, Judge v. Nation 70 63.1 60 54.5

50 45.5

40 36.9 Nation Robinson 30 Percentage

20

10

0 Patent Owner Accused Infringer

6 Patentee Win Rates: By Nominating President: The number of patent cases in this district assigned to active judges and the win rates for those cases are shown below, broken out by the nominating president.

Number of Cases - by Nominating President Number of Cases: The number of Barack Obama cases assigned to active jduges in William J. Clinton 2,997 1,831 this district is shown in the chart to the left, broken out by nominating president. This includes all cases of the type covered by this report.

Barack Obama 47.3% George Bush 23.6% George W. Bush 0.2% William J. Clinton 28.9% Total: 100.0%

George W. Bush 11 George Bush 1,492

Patentee Win Rates: The win Win Rates by Nominating President rates for these cases, broken out 70 by nominating president, are shown in the chart to the right. 60 This includes overall win rates (includes consent and default 50 judgments), contested win rates (does NOT include consent and 40 Overall Win Rate default judgments), and trial win Contested Win Rate rates (cases decided by bench 30 Trial Win Rate trial or jury verdict). 20

Plaintiff Percentage of Cases Won 10

0 Barack Obama George Bush George W. Bush William J. Clinton

Total

Overall Win # of Contested Win # of Contested Trial Win # of Trial Rate Judgments Rate Judgments Rate Jugements

Barack Obama 45.6 296 36.1 205 68.6 70

George Bush 44.0 224 32.7 171 55.4 83

George W. Bush 0 0 0

William J. Clinton 58.2 176 43.4 91 62.5 52

7 Overview: Markman Rulings There were 116 Markman/claim construction rulings in these cases, not counting rulings made in connection with summary judgment motions. The average time from case filing to Markman rulings was 25.6 months. The variation from year to year is shown below. For more information, see the Markman/Claim Construction section below.

Average Time to Markman Decision 60

50

40

Judge 30 Nation

20 Months from Case Filing

10

0

1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017

Overview: Summary Judgment There were 492 summary judgment rulings on contested motions in these cases. The win rate on these contested motions was 35.4%. In this report, a decision granting a motion in part and denying it in part is treated as 1/2 a decision for the movant. The variation from year to year is shown below. For more information, see the Summary Judgment Motion section below. Contested Summary Judgment Win Rates, by Year 60

50

40

Judge 30 Nation Percentage 20

10

0

1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017

8 Overview: Stay Pending Reexamination and Stay Pending Inter Partes Review The win rate on motions to stay pending reexamination and on motions to stay pending Inter Partes Review for this judge are shown in the chart and table below. The table also includes the number of such motion decisions. In this report, a decision granting a motion in part and denying it in part is treated as 1/2 a decision for the movant. The variation from year to year is shown below. For more information, see the Stay Motion section below.

Contested Stay Pending Reexam Win Rates, by Year 100

80

Judge Stay Pending 60 Reexam Nation Stay Pending Reexam Judge Stay Pending IPR

Percentage 40 Nation Stay Pending IPR

20

0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Total

Stay Pending # of Stay Pending Stay Pending IPR # of Stay Pending IPR Reexam Win Rate Reexam Decisions Win Rate Decisions

Total 32.4 17 33.3 6

2009 0.0 1 0

2010 50.0 2 0

2011 16.7 3 0

2012 0.0 2 0

2013 0.0 1 0

2014 66.7 3 33.3 3

2015 0.0 2 33.3 3

2016 50.0 2 0

2017 100.0 1 0

9 Overview: Time to Disposition-All Cases The average time from case filing to case disposition by Judge Robinson is 15.0 months. The distribution of case terminations by month of litigation is shown below for the first 48 months of litigation. Cases still open at the end of 48 months, if any, are all lumped into month "49". Months with no closed cases are omitted from the chart.

Distribution of All Closed Cases 100

80

60

40

Number of Closed Cases 20

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 49 Month of Litigation

Overview: Time to Disposition-Cases with Judgments The average time from case filing to case disposition by judgment in favor of a party (includes consent and default judgments) in these cases is 26.9 months. The distribution of judgments by month of litigation is shown below for the first 48 months of litigation. Cases still open at the end of 48 months, if any, are all lumped into month "49". Months with no closed cases are omitted from the chart.

Distribution of Cases Closed by Judgment 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 Number of Closed Cases 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 49 Month of Litigation

10 Overview: Time to Disposition-Contested Judgments The average time from case filing to case disposition by contested judgment (does NOT include consent and default judgments) in these cases is 30.9 months. The distribution of judgments by month of litigation is shown below for the first 48 months of litigation. Cases still open at the end of 48 months, if any, are all lumped into month "49". Months with no closed cases are omitted from the chart.

Distribution of Cases Closed by Contested Judgment 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 Number of Closed Cases 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 49 Month of Litigation

Overview: Time to Disposition-Trials The average time from case filing to case disposition by trial (includes bench and jury trials) in these cases is 36.4 months. The distribution of judgments by month of litigation is shown below for the first 48 months of litigation. Cases still open at the end of 48 months, if any, are all lumped into month "49". Months with no closed cases are omitted from the chart.

Distribution of Cases Closed by Trial 11 10.5 10 9.5 9 8.5 8 7.5 7 6.5 6 5.5 5 4.5 4 3.5 3

Number of Closed Cases 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 49 Month of Litigation

11 Case Outcomes with Judgments: The win rates for patent owners and accused infringers by various outcomes are shown below. Details for each outcome are set forth in the following sections of the report.

Patentee Win Rate Accused Infringer Total 42.5 57.5 Bench Trial 42.5 57.5

Confirmation of Arbitration Award 0.0 100.0

Consent Judgment 79.8 20.2

Involuntary Dismissal 8.7 91.3

Judgment as a Matter of Law 0.0 100.0

Jury Verdict 67.6 32.4

Other Termination 25.0 75.0

Summary Judgment 6.3 93.8

Case Win Rates, by Outcome 100.0 100.0 100 91.3 93.8

79.8 80 75.0 67.6

60 57.5 Patentee 42.5 Accused Infringer 40

Percentage 32.4 25.0 20.2 20 8.7 6.3 0.0 0.0 0

Summary Bench Trial Involuntary Jury Verdict Dismissal Judgment Judgment as a Confirmation of Matter of Law Consent Judgment Other Termination Arbitration Award

12 Bench Trial There was/were 40 case(s) terminated by Bench Trial. The patentee win rate was 42.5% and the accused infringer win rate was 57.5%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 31.2. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Outcomes by Month For Bench Trial 6

5

4

3

2 Number of Cases

1

0 16 18 20 22 23 27 28 29 30 31 33 34 36 38 39 40 43 45 47 49 Month of Litigation

The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party Pendency Bayer AG, et al v. Housey 1:01cv00148 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 33.1 Pharmaceutica, et al Kao Corporation, et al v. 1:01cv00680 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 35.8 Unilever U S Inc., et al Novo Nordisk Pharm., et al 1:02cv00332 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 27.2 v. Bio-Technology Gen., et al Atofina v. Great Lakes 1:02cv01250 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 32.7 Chemical Medtronic Inc. v. Guidant 1:03cv00848 Bench Trial Patentee 22.7 Corporation, et al Praxair Inc., et al v. ATMI 1:03cv01158 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 42.3 Inc., et al Bayer AG, et al v. Dr. 1:04cv00179 Bench Trial Patentee 44.2 Reddy's Lab.Ltd., et al In re: '318 Patent 1:05cv00356 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 38.8 Infringement Litigation Vanderbilt University v. ICOS 1:05cv00506 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 42.3 Corporation Takeda Pharmaceutical 1:06cv00033 Bench Trial Both 26.4 Company LTD. et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. Bayer Healthcare AG et al v. 1:06cv00234 Bench Trial Patentee 42.5 Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. Takeda Pharmaceutical 1:07cv00331 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 29.6 Company Limited et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et al Cancer Research 1:07cv00457 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 30.4 Technology Limited v. Barr 13 Laboratories Inc. et al Bench Trial There was/were 40 case(s) terminated by Bench Trial. The patentee win rate was 42.5% and the accused infringer win rate was 57.5%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 31.2. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Outcomes by Month For Bench Trial 6

5

4

3

2 Number of Cases

1

0 16 18 20 22 23 27 28 29 30 31 33 34 36 38 39 40 43 45 47 49 Month of Litigation

The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party Pendency Senju Pharmaceutical Co. 1:07cv00779 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 30.7 Ltd. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al Medtronic Inc. v. Boston 1:07cv00823 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 39.4 Scientific Corporation et al Biacore AB, et al v. Thermo 1:97cv00274 Bench Trial Patentee 46.8 Bioanalysis Clontech Labs Inc. v. 1:98cv00750 Bench Trial Patentee 53.2 Invitrogen Union Carbide Chem, et al v. 1:99cv00274 Bench Trial Patentee 61.4 Shell Oil Company, et al Genetics Institute LLC v. 1:08cv00290 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 21.4 Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc. Cephalon Inc. et al v. 1:08cv00330 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 33.2 Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al Eurand Inc. et al v. Mylan 1:08cv00889 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 29.5 Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al OSI Pharmaceuticals Inc. et 1:09cv00185 Bench Trial Patentee 37.4 al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. Pronova BioPharma Norge 1:09cv00286 Bench Trial Patentee 37.2 AS v. Teva Pharamceuticals USA, Inc. Allergan Inc. v. Barr 1:09cv00333 Bench Trial Patentee 28.5 Laboratories Inc. Eurand Inc. et al v. Anchen 1:09cv00492 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 22.1 Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al Eurand Inc. et al v. Anchen 1:09cv00715 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 19.6 14 Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al Bench Trial There was/were 40 case(s) terminated by Bench Trial. The patentee win rate was 42.5% and the accused infringer win rate was 57.5%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 31.2. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Outcomes by Month For Bench Trial 6

5

4

3

2 Number of Cases

1

0 16 18 20 22 23 27 28 29 30 31 33 34 36 38 39 40 43 45 47 49 Month of Litigation

The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party Pendency Cephalon Inc. v. Watson 1:09cv00724 Bench Trial Patentee 17.9 Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al Eurand, Inc. et al v. Anchen 1:09cv00922 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 17.1 Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al Eurand Inc et al v. Anchen 1:09cv00923 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 17.1 Pharmaceuticals Inc et al In re: Cyclobenzaprine 1:09md02118 Bench Trial Both 17.3 Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsule Patent Litigation Cephalon Inc. et al v. Mylan 1:11cv00164 Bench Trial Patentee 28.9 Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al Senju Pharmaceutical Co. 1:11cv00271 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 28.3 Ltd. et al v. Lupin Limited et al Intendis GmbH et al v. 1:13cv00421 Bench Trial Patentee 28.4 Glenmark Generics Limited et al Fresenius Kabi USA LLC v. 1:13cv00925 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 15.5 Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. et al Forest Laboratories 1:13cv01602 Bench Trial Patentee 33.6 Holdings Ltd. et al v. Apotex Corp. et al Orexo AB et al v. Actavis 1:14cv00829 Bench Trial Patentee 28.7 Elizabeth LLC Merck Sharp & Dohme 1:14cv00874 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 28.5 Corp. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.

Aptalis Pharmatech Inc. et al 1:14cv01038 Bench Trial Patentee 27.915 v. Apotex Inc. et al Bench Trial There was/were 40 case(s) terminated by Bench Trial. The patentee win rate was 42.5% and the accused infringer win rate was 57.5%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 31.2. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Outcomes by Month For Bench Trial 6

5

4

3

2 Number of Cases

1

0 16 18 20 22 23 27 28 29 30 31 33 34 36 38 39 40 43 45 47 49 Month of Litigation

The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party Pendency Endo Pharmaceuticals 1:14cv01422 Bench Trial Patentee 26.7 Solutions Inc. et al v. Custopharm Inc. Merck Sharp & Dohme 1:15cv00250 Bench Trial Accused Infringer 22.4 Corp. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC

16 Confirmation of Arbitration Award There was/were 1 case(s) terminated by Confirmation of Arbitration Award. The patentee win rate was 0.0% and the accused infringer win rate was 100.0%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 68.2. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Outcomes by Month For Confirmation of Arbitration Award 1

0.8

0.6

0.4 Number of Cases

0.2

0 49 Month of Litigation

The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party Pendency Cordis Corporation v. 1:00cv00886 Confirmation of Accused Infringer 68.2 Medtronic Vascular Arbitration Award

17 Consent Judgment There was/were 47 case(s) terminated by Consent Judgment. The patentee win rate was 79.8% and the accused infringer win rate was 20.2%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 13.6. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Outcomes by Month For Consent Judgment 5

4

3

2 Number of Cases

1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 30 47 Month of Litigation

The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party Pendency Jupiter Media Metrix v. PC 1:00cv00874 Consent Judgment Patentee 5.8 Data Inc Original Creatine v. Twin 1:02cv00365 Consent Judgment Patentee 13.8 Laboratories Emulex Corporation v. 1:03cv00237 Consent Judgment Patentee 16.1 Qlogic Corporation Teva Pharmaceuticals, et al 1:03cv00808 Consent Judgment Patentee 11.5 v. Pharmaceutical Inc., et al Versus Technology v. 1:04cv01231 Consent Judgment Patentee 19.7 Radianse Inc. Item Development AB et al 1:05cv00336 Consent Judgment Patentee 29.1 v. SICOR Inc. et al King Pharmaceuticals 1:05cv00337 Consent Judgment Patentee 29.1 Research and Development, Inc. et al v. SICOR Inc. et al MedPointe Healthcare Inc. v. 1:06cv00164 Consent Judgment Patentee 25.4 Apotex Inc. et al CooperVision Inc. v. CIBA 1:06cv00239 Consent Judgment Patentee 19.4 Vision Corporation Block Drug Company, Inc. v. 1:06cv00350 Consent Judgment Patentee 12.8 Sedona Laboratories Inc. 3M Innovative Properties 1:06cv00375 Consent Judgment Patentee 1.4 Company et al v. Assuretec Systems Inc. Alcoa Inc. v. Alcan Inc. et al 1:06cv00383 Consent Judgment Patentee 13.4 MedPointe Healthcare Inc. v. 1:07cv00204 Consent Judgment Patentee 12.2 Apotex Inc. et al MedPointe Healthcare Inc. v. 1:07cv00407 Consent Judgment Patentee 16.2 Sun Pharmaceutical 18 Industries Ltd. Consent Judgment There was/were 47 case(s) terminated by Consent Judgment. The patentee win rate was 79.8% and the accused infringer win rate was 20.2%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 13.6. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Outcomes by Month For Consent Judgment 5

4

3

2 Number of Cases

1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 30 47 Month of Litigation

The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party Pendency Kenexa BrassRing Inc. v. 1:07cv00521 Consent Judgment Patentee 46.8 Taleo Corporation Cytyc Corporation v. 1:99cv00610 Consent Judgment Patentee 16.0 Autocyte Inc. WebXchange Inc. v. Allstate 1:08cv00131 Consent Judgment Both 1.8 Corporation et al Cordis Corporation v. Boston 1:08cv00779 Consent Judgment Patentee 15.5 Scientific Corporation et al Meda Pharmaceuticals Inc. 1:09cv00241 Consent Judgment Patentee 0.7 v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Streamlight, Inc. v. 221B 1:17cv00036 Consent Judgment Patentee 2.1 Resources LLC Armstrong World Industries, 1:10cv00081 Consent Judgment Patentee 1.0 Inc. v. Congoleum Corporation Kenexa BrassRing Inc. v. 1:11cv00516 Consent Judgment Patentee 1.4 Taleo Corporation et al Belden Inc. v. Superior 1:11cv00678 Consent Judgment Patentee 3.3 Essex Inc. et al Cephalon Inc. et al v. Impax 1:11cv01152 Consent Judgment Patentee 19.9 Laboratories Inc. Senju Pharmaceutical Co. 1:12cv00159 Consent Judgment Accused Infringer 19.7 Ltd. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al Depomed Inc. et al v. 1:12cv00492 Consent Judgment Patentee 20.7 Watson Laboratories Inc. Florida et al Astellas US LLC et al v. 1:12cv00652 Consent Judgment Patentee 4.2 Hospira Inc. 19 Consent Judgment There was/were 47 case(s) terminated by Consent Judgment. The patentee win rate was 79.8% and the accused infringer win rate was 20.2%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 13.6. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Outcomes by Month For Consent Judgment 5

4

3

2 Number of Cases

1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 30 47 Month of Litigation

The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party Pendency Astellas US LLC et al v. 1:12cv01489 Consent Judgment Patentee 3.4 Akorn Inc. Astellas US LLC et al v. 1:12cv01699 Consent Judgment Patentee 3.4 Fresenius Kabi USA LLC Depomed Inc. v. Watson 1:13cv00342 Consent Judgment Patentee 10.3 Laboratories Inc. - Florida et al HBAC MatchMaker Media 1:13cv00428 Consent Judgment Accused Infringer 23.2 Inc. v. CBS Interactive Inc. HBAC MatchMaker Media 1:13cv00429 Consent Judgment Accused Infringer 22.9 Inc. v. Inc. et al HBAC MatchMaker Media 1:13cv00430 Consent Judgment Accused Infringer 23.2 Inc. v. NBC Entertainment et al HBAC MatchMaker Media 1:13cv00433 Consent Judgment Accused Infringer 23.2 Inc. v. Disney Online et al. HBAC MatchMaker Media 1:13cv00436 Consent Judgment Accused Infringer 24.3 Inc. v. Vevo LLC HBAC MatchMaker Media 1:13cv00437 Consent Judgment Accused Infringer 24.3 Inc. v. Viacom International Inc. HBAC MatchMaker Media 1:13cv00962 Consent Judgment Accused Infringer 21.8 Inc. v. Blip Networks Inc. Poly-America L P v. API 1:14cv00599 Consent Judgment Accused Infringer 17.1 Industries Inc. Cephalon Inc. v. Actavis 1:14cv00776 Consent Judgment Patentee 11.2 Laboratories FL Inc. et al Janssen Products LP et al v. 1:14cv01056 Consent Judgment Patentee 8.6 Cipla Ltd. et al 20 Consent Judgment There was/were 47 case(s) terminated by Consent Judgment. The patentee win rate was 79.8% and the accused infringer win rate was 20.2%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 13.6. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Outcomes by Month For Consent Judgment 5

4

3

2 Number of Cases

1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 30 47 Month of Litigation

The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party Pendency Astellas US LLC et al v. 1:14cv01246 Consent Judgment Patentee 6.0 Actavis Elizabeth LLC Janssen Products LP et al v. 1:15cv00307 Consent Judgment Patentee 0.8 Cipla Ltd. et al Tervis Tumbler Company, 1:15cv00660 Consent Judgment Patentee 0.9 Inc. v. Coleman Company Inc. et al Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 1:15cv00900 Consent Judgment Patentee 21.0 et al v. Taro Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Dragerwerk AG & Co. 1:15cv00925 Consent Judgment Patentee 4.0 KGaA et al v. Allied Healthcare Products Inc. Amneal Pharmaceuticals 1:16cv00300 Consent Judgment Patentee 0.9 LLC v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al Lupin Atlantis Holdings S.A. 1:16cv00708 Consent Judgment Patentee 10.8 v. InvaGen Pharmaceuticals Inc.

21 Involuntary Dismissal There was/were 23 case(s) terminated by Involuntary Dismissal. The patentee win rate was 8.7% and the accused infringer win rate was 91.3%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 11.9. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Outcomes by Month For Involuntary Dismissal 6

5

4

3

2 Number of Cases

1

0 8 9 10 11 17 18 Month of Litigation

The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party Pendency Intersil Corporation, et al v. 1:01cv00266 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 7.2 Proxim Inc. Ellenby Technologies, et al v. 1:01cv00416 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 7.7 AT Systems Inc., et al Apotex Inc., et al v. Pfizer 1:03cv00990 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 8.0 Inc., et al Vermeer Manu. v. Deere 1:04cv01343 Involuntary Dismissal Patentee 9.9 & Company Time Warner Cable Inc. v. 1:06cv00387 Involuntary Dismissal Patentee 16.5 USA Video Technology Corp. Brinkmeier v. BIC 1:09cv00860 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 9.4 Corporation et al Brinkmeier v. Bayer 1:10cv00001 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 7.7 Healthcare LLC Senju Pharmaceutical Co. 1:11cv01171 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 9.7 Ltd. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al McDowell v. USA et al 1:12cv01302 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 7.9 Vehicle Operation 1:13cv00538 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 17.2 Technologies LLC v. BMW of North America LLC Vehicle Operation 1:13cv00539 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 17.2 Technologies LLC v. Ford Motor Company Vehicle Operation 1:13cv00540 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 17.2 Technologies LLC v. General Motors LLC Vehicle Operation 1:13cv00541 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 17.2 Technologies LLC v. Nissan North America Inc. 22 Involuntary Dismissal There was/were 23 case(s) terminated by Involuntary Dismissal. The patentee win rate was 8.7% and the accused infringer win rate was 91.3%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 11.9. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Outcomes by Month For Involuntary Dismissal 6

5

4

3

2 Number of Cases

1

0 8 9 10 11 17 18 Month of Litigation

The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party Pendency Vehicle Operation 1:13cv00542 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 17.2 Technologies LLC v. Porsche Cars North America Inc. Vehicle Operation 1:13cv00712 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 16.7 Technologies LLC v. Mitsubishi Motors North America Inc. Goodman Manufacturing 1:13cv02014 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 9.5 Company LP et al v. Carrier Corporation Drager Medical GmbH et al 1:13cv01656 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 17.7 v. Allied Healthcare Products Inc. Senju Pharmaceutical Co. 1:14cv00579 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 10.9 Ltd. et al v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. et al Parus Holdings Inc. v. Sallie 1:14cv01427 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 10.5 Mae Bank et al Parus Holdings Inc. v. PNC 1:14cv01428 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 10.5 Bank N.A. Parus Holdings Inc. v. 1:14cv01429 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 10.5 SunTrust Bank et al Cyberfone Systems LLC v. 1:14cv01489 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 9.7 Lexmark International Inc Device Enhancement LLC v. 1:15cv00762 Involuntary Dismissal Accused Infringer 8.5 .com Inc.

23 Judgment as a Matter of Law There was/were 1 case(s) terminated by Judgment as a Matter of Law. The patentee win rate was 0.0% and the accused infringer win rate was 100.0%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 84.6. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Outcomes by Month For Judgment as a Matter of Law 1

0.8

0.6

0.4 Number of Cases

0.2

0 49 Month of Litigation

The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party Pendency Cordis Corporation v. Boston 1:98cv00197 Judgment as a Matter Accused Infringer 84.6 Scientific, et al of Law

24 Jury Verdict There was/were 37 case(s) terminated by Jury Verdict. The patentee win rate was 67.6% and the accused infringer win rate was 32.4%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 42.0. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Outcomes by Month For Jury Verdict 10

8

6

4 Number of Cases

2

0 13 19 21 22 23 26 27 29 30 31 33 34 35 36 38 41 43 45 49 Month of Litigation

The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party Pendency Eaton Corporation v. 1:00cv00751 Jury Verdict Accused Infringer 34.1 Parker-Hannifin Corp Intel Corporation v. 1:00cv00796 Jury Verdict Accused Infringer 30.4 Broadcom Corporation Stambler v. RSA Security 1:01cv00065 Jury Verdict Accused Infringer 26.4 Inc., et al Elster Electricity v. 1:01cv00077 Jury Verdict Both 28.2 SchlumbergerSema Inc Intuitive Surgical, et al v. 1:01cv00203 Jury Verdict Patentee 20.4 Computer Motion Inc. ArthroCare Corp. v. Smith & 1:01cv00504 Jury Verdict Patentee 21.6 Nephew Inc., et al Symbol Technologies v. 1:01cv00801 Jury Verdict Patentee 32.0 Proxim Inc. Syngenta Seeds Inc. v. 1:02cv01331 Jury Verdict Accused Infringer 40.7 Monsanto Company, et al Cordis Corporation v. Boston 1:03cv00027 Jury Verdict Both 56.3 Scientific, et al Padcom Inc. v. Netmotion 1:03cv00983 Jury Verdict Patentee 32.5 Wireless, et al IMX, Inc. v. E-Loan, Inc., et 1:03cv01067 Jury Verdict Patentee 37.6 al TruePosition Inc. v. Andrew 1:05cv00747 Jury Verdict Patentee 22.8 Corporation McKesson Automation Inc. 1:06cv00028 Jury Verdict Accused Infringer 72.0 v. Swisslog Holding AG et al Callaway Golf Company v. 1:06cv00091 Jury Verdict Patentee 33.0 Acushnet Company 25 Jury Verdict There was/were 37 case(s) terminated by Jury Verdict. The patentee win rate was 67.6% and the accused infringer win rate was 32.4%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 42.0. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Outcomes by Month For Jury Verdict 10

8

6

4 Number of Cases

2

0 13 19 21 22 23 26 27 29 30 31 33 34 35 36 38 41 43 45 49 Month of Litigation

The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party Pendency Siemens Medical Solutions 1:07cv00190 Jury Verdict Patentee 18.0 USA Inc. v. Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics Inc. Belden Technologies Inc. et 1:08cv00063 Jury Verdict Patentee 32.1 al v. Superior Essex Inc. et al TA Instruments, et al v. 1:95cv00545 Jury Verdict Patentee 92.8 Perkin - Elmer Corp. C R Bard Inc v. Medtronic, 1:96cv00589 Jury Verdict Accused Infringer 58.2 Inc Cordis Corporation, et al v. 1:97cv00550 Jury Verdict Patentee 101.7 Advanced Cardio Sys, et al Arterial Vascular, et al v. 1:97cv00700 Jury Verdict Patentee 87.1 Cordis Corporation, et al Boston Scientific, et al v. 1:98cv00019 Jury Verdict Patentee 98.5 Johnson and Johnson, et al Abbott Cardio Sys, et al v. 1:98cv00080 Jury Verdict Patentee 84.0 Medtronic Vascular, et al Pechiney Rhenalu v. Alcoa 1:99cv00301 Jury Verdict Accused Infringer 40.3 Inc. MLMC Ltd. v. Airtouch 1:99cv00781 Jury Verdict Accused Infringer 25.3 Comm Inc., et al Scimed Life Systems, et al 1:99cv00904 Jury Verdict Patentee 33.2 v. Johnson & Johnson, et al SOITEC Silicon On Insulator 1:08cv00292 Jury Verdict Patentee 37.8 Technologies SA et al v. MEMC Electronic Materials Inc. Robert Bosch LLC v. Pylon 1:08cv00542 Jury Verdict Patentee 20.1 Manufacturing Corp 26 Jury Verdict There was/were 37 case(s) terminated by Jury Verdict. The patentee win rate was 67.6% and the accused infringer win rate was 32.4%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 42.0. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Outcomes by Month For Jury Verdict 10

8

6

4 Number of Cases

2

0 13 19 21 22 23 26 27 29 30 31 33 34 35 36 38 41 43 45 49 Month of Litigation

The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party Pendency Asahi Glass Co Ltd. et al v. 1:09cv00515 Jury Verdict Patentee 37.2 Guardian Industries Corp. ArcelorMittal France et al v. 1:10cv00050 Jury Verdict Accused Infringer 12.1 AK Steel Corporation et al Ironworks Patents LLC v. 1:10cv00258 Jury Verdict Patentee 32.6 Apple Inc. Boston Scientific 1:10cv00315 Jury Verdict Patentee 22.8 Corporation et al v. Cordis Corporation Vehicle IP LLC v. Werner 1:10cv00503 Jury Verdict Accused Infringer 42.3 Enterprises Inc. Netgear Inc. v. Ruckus 1:10cv00999 Jury Verdict Accused Infringer 35.5 Wireless Inc. Intellectual Ventures I LLC et 1:11cv00908 Jury Verdict Patentee 53.8 al v. Motorola Mobility LLC INVISTA North America 1:11cv01007 Jury Verdict Patentee 29.3 S.ar.l. v. M&G USA Corporation et al SRI International Inc. v. 1:13cv01534 Jury Verdict Patentee 44.6 Cisco Systems Inc. Amgen Inc. et al v. Sanofi et 1:14cv01317 Jury Verdict Patentee 26.6 al

27 Other Termination There was/were 4 case(s) terminated by Other Termination. The patentee win rate was 25.0% and the accused infringer win rate was 75.0%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 35.0. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Outcomes by Month For Other Termination 2

1.6

1.2

0.8 Number of Cases

0.4

0 13 18 49 Month of Litigation

The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party Pendency Housey v. Abbott Pharm 1:01cv00401 Other Termination Accused Infringer 17.4 Corp., et al Boston Sci Scimed, et al v. 1:03cv00283 Other Termination Patentee 54.4 Cordis Corporation, et al Medtronic Vascular v. 1:04cv00034 Other Termination Accused Infringer 12.6 Boston Scientific, et al Stephenson v. Game Show 1:12cv00614 Other Termination Accused Infringer 55.6 Network LLC et al

28 Summary Judgment There was/were 48 case(s) terminated by Summary Judgment. The patentee win rate was 6.3% and the accused infringer win rate was 93.8%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 29.1. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Outcomes by Month For Summary Judgment 5

4

3

2 Number of Cases

1

0 4 8 11 12 18 19 20 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 37 38 41 43 46 47 49 Month of Litigation

The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party Pendency Augustine Medical v. 1:01cv00387 Summary Judgment Patentee 22.2 Mallinckrodt Med Inc, et al Izumi Products Co v. 1:02cv00156 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 26.1 Koninklijke Philips, et al Corporation v. 1:03cv01035 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 33.6 Juniper Networks, et al Monsanto Company, et al v. 1:04cv00305 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 24.8 Syngenta Seeds Inc., et al SRI International v. Internet 1:04cv01199 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 26.0 Security, et al LP Matthews LLC v. Bath & 1:04cv01507 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 23.2 Body Works, et al Rocep Lusol Holdings 1:05cv00141 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 22.3 Limited v. Permatex Inc. et al Automated Transactions 1:06cv00043 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 64.5 LLC v. 7-Eleven Inc. et al Nuance Communications 1:06cv00105 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 50.1 Inc. et al v. Tellme Networks Inc. IGT v. Bally Gaming 1:06cv00282 Summary Judgment Patentee 48.0 International Inc. et al et al v. 1:06cv00414 Summary Judgment Patentee 29.8 Parallel Networks LLC Solvay S.A. v. Honeywell 1:06cv00557 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 27.1 International Inc. Intermec Technologies Corp. 1:07cv00272 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 45.2 v. Palm Inc. Wellman Inc. v. Eastman 1:07cv00585 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 28.4 29 Chemical Company Summary Judgment There was/were 48 case(s) terminated by Summary Judgment. The patentee win rate was 6.3% and the accused infringer win rate was 93.8%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 29.1. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Outcomes by Month For Summary Judgment 5

4

3

2 Number of Cases

1

0 4 8 11 12 18 19 20 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 37 38 41 43 46 47 49 Month of Litigation

The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party Pendency Boston Scientific 1:07cv00765 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 25.8 Corporation et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc. et al Accenture Global Services 1:07cv00826 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 42.1 GmbH et al v. Guidewire Software Inc. Manchak v. Chemical Lime 1:98cv00356 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 53.9 Co., et al Medtronic Vascular v. 1:98cv00478 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 77.7 Boston Scientific, et al Apeldyn Corporation v. AU 1:08cv00568 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 40.3 Optronics Corporation et al Autocell Laboratories Inc. v. 1:08cv00760 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 26.9 Cisco Systems Inc. Cordis Corporation v. Boston 1:10cv00039 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 31.0 Scientific Corporation et al Golden Bridge Technology 1:10cv00428 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 37.2 Inc. v. Apple Inc. et al Helicos Biosciences 1:10cv00735 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 25.2 Corporation et al v. Illumina Inc Keurig Incorporated v. Sturm 1:10cv00841 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 25.1 Foods Inc. Butamax (TM) Advanced 1:11cv00054 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 26.8 Biofuels LLC v. Gevo Inc. Apeldyn Corporation v. 1:11cv00440 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 46.5 Corporation et al Motivation Innovations LLC 1:11cv00615 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 37.0 v. Ulta Salon Cosmetics & Fragrance Inc. 30 Summary Judgment There was/were 48 case(s) terminated by Summary Judgment. The patentee win rate was 6.3% and the accused infringer win rate was 93.8%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 29.1. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Outcomes by Month For Summary Judgment 5

4

3

2 Number of Cases

1

0 4 8 11 12 18 19 20 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 37 38 41 43 46 47 49 Month of Litigation

The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party Pendency Technology Innovations LLC 1:11cv00690 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 31.8 v. Amazon.com Inc. CyberFone Systems LLC v. 1:11cv00829 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 11.1 CNN Interactive Group Inc. et al CyberFone Systems LLC v. 1:11cv00831 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 11.1 Amazon.com Inc. et al Cradle IP LLC v. Texas 1:11cv01254 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 23.6 Instruments, Inc. Cot'N Wash Inc. et al v. Sun 1:12cv00651 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 27.2 Products Corporation Joao Bock Transaction 1:12cv01138 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 27.1 Systems LLC v. Jack Henry & Associates Inc. YYZ LLC v. Hewlett Packard 1:13cv00136 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 32.4 Company Auxilium Pharmaceuticals 1:13cv00148 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 10.2 Inc. et al v. Upsher-Smith Laboratories Inc. Gevo Inc. v. Butamax (TM) 1:13cv00576 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 3.9 Advanced Biofuels LLC et al YYZ LLC v. Adobe Systems 1:13cv00579 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 29.9 Inc. YYZ LLC v. Pegasystems 1:13cv00581 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 29.9 Inc. ArcelorMittal et al v. AK 1:13cv00685 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 7.7 Steel Corporation ArcelorMittal France et al v. 1:13cv00686 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 7.7 Severstal Dearborn LLC, et al 31 Summary Judgment There was/were 48 case(s) terminated by Summary Judgment. The patentee win rate was 6.3% and the accused infringer win rate was 93.8%. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 29.1. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Outcomes by Month For Summary Judgment 5

4

3

2 Number of Cases

1

0 4 8 11 12 18 19 20 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 37 38 41 43 46 47 49 Month of Litigation

The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Prevailing Party Pendency Poly-America L P v. API 1:13cv00693 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 19.5 Industries Inc. Cloud Satchel LLC v. 1:13cv00941 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 19.0 Amazon.com Inc. Cloud Satchel LLC v. Barnes 1:13cv00942 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 19.0 Noble Inc. Motivation Innovations LLC 1:13cv00957 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 31.4 v. PetSmart Inc. Rosebud LMS Inc. v. Adobe 1:14cv00194 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 11.7 Systems Incorporated BASF Corporation v. 1:14cv01204 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 17.4 Johnson Matthey Inc. Quest Integrity USA LLC v. 1:14cv01482 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 27.4 Clean Harbors Industrial Services Inc. Quest Integrity USA LLC v. 1:14cv01483 Summary Judgment Accused Infringer 30.9 Cokebusters USA Inc.

32 Case Outcomes with No Judgments in Favor of a Party: The cases terminated without a judgment in favor of a party are identified below, including the distribution of those outcomes by month of litigation.

Bankruptcy Stay There was/were 6 case(s) terminated by Bankruptcy Stay. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 8.2. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Bankruptcy Stay 1

0.8

0.6

0.4 Number of Cases

0.2

0 1 2 4 10 13 21 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

FreeMarkets Inc. v. 1:02cv00162 Bankruptcy Stay 12.7 PurchasePro.com Inc., et al British Telecomm. v. Touch 1:03cv00529 Bankruptcy Stay 1.6 America Lancaster Composite v. 1:03cv00840 Bankruptcy Stay 10.0 Hardcore Composites Corporation v. Delphi 1:05cv00481 Bankruptcy Stay 4.0 Corporation et al Internet Media Interactive 1:12cv01193 Bankruptcy Stay 0.4 Corporation v. Journal Register Company E.I. du Pont de Nemours 1:14cv01078 Bankruptcy Stay 20.2 and Company v. SunEdison, Inc. et al

33 Consolidation There was/were 59 case(s) terminated by Consolidation. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 5.5. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Consolidation 10

8

6

4 Number of Cases

2

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 14 23 32 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Scimed Life Systems, et al 1:00cv00404 Consolidation 8.7 v. Johnson & Johnson, et al Informix Software v. Intl Bus 1:00cv00628 Consolidation 7.4 Machines Genzyme Corporation v. 1:01cv00229 Consolidation 2.2 Genentech Inc. FreeMarkets Inc. v. 1:02cv00164 Consolidation 2.9 B2eMarkets Inc. FreeMarkets Inc. v. Procuri 1:02cv00165 Consolidation 2.9 Inc. Abbott Laboratories, et al v. 1:04cv00047 Consolidation 1.3 Teva Pharmaceuticals Abbott Laboratories, et al v. 1:04cv00048 Consolidation 1.3 Impax Laboratories Tenneco Operating v. 1:04cv00909 Consolidation 6.0 Visteon Corporation DeKalb Genetic Corporation 1:05cv00355 Consolidation 2.7 v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc. et al Janssen Pharmaceutica N V 1:05cv00371 Consolidation 4.5 et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al Janssen Pharmaceutica N V 1:05cv00380 Consolidation 4.4 et al v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc. et al Janssen Pharmaceutica 1:05cv00381 Consolidation 4.4 N.V. et al v. Barr Laboratories, Inc. et al Janssen Pharmaceutica N V 1:05cv00382 Consolidation 4.4 et al v. Purepac Pharmaceutical Co. et al Internet Security Systems, 1:05cv00405 Consolidation 2.3 Inc. v. SRI International Janssen Pharmaceutica 1:05cv00420 Consolidation 4.0 N.V. et al v. Alphapharm Pty Ltd. 34 Consolidation There was/were 59 case(s) terminated by Consolidation. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 5.5. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Consolidation 10

8

6

4 Number of Cases

2

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 14 23 32 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Janssen Pharmaceutica N V 1:05cv00451 Consolidation 3.7 et al v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc. et al Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. 1:05cv00528 Consolidation 2.2 Intermec Technologies Corp. Bayer Healthcare AG et al v. 1:07cv00195 Consolidation 1.2 Teva Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Boston Scientific 1:07cv00333 Consolidation 31.9 Corporation et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc. et al Boston Scientific 1:07cv00348 Consolidation 31.7 Corporation et al v. Johnson and Johnson Inc. et al Boston Scientific 1:07cv00409 Consolidation 11.6 Corporation et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc. et al Elan Corporation PLC v. 1:07cv00603 Consolidation 4.7 Intellipharmaceutics Corporation et al Elan Corporation PLC et al 1:07cv00679 Consolidation 3.7 v. Actavis South Atlantic LLC Elan Corporation PLC et al 1:07cv00736 Consolidation 3.2 v. Barr Laboratories Inc. Luv N Care Ltd. v. Bamed 1:08cv00213 Consolidation 1.7 AG Kenexa BrassRing Inc. v. 1:08cv00276 Consolidation 4.9 Vurv Technology Inc. Ethypharm S.A. v. Barr 1:08cv00344 Consolidation 3.1 Laboratories Inc. et al Cephalon Inc. et al v. Barr 1:08cv00810 Consolidation 7.0 Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al Novartis Corporation et al v. 1:08cv00952 Consolidation 2.5 Teva Parenteral Medicines Inc. et al 35 Consolidation There was/were 59 case(s) terminated by Consolidation. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 5.5. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Consolidation 10

8

6

4 Number of Cases

2

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 14 23 32 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Cephalon Inc. et al v. Barr 1:09cv00074 Consolidation 3.9 Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al OSI Pharmaceuticals Inc. et 1:09cv00186 Consolidation 1.6 al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. Pronova BioPharma Norge 1:09cv00305 Consolidation 23.0 AS v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc. et al Eurand Inc. et al v. Par 1:09cv00816 Consolidation 5.5 Pharmaceutical Inc. Bristol-Myers Squibb 1:10cv00198 Consolidation 0.3 Company et al v. Teva Pharamceuticals USA, Inc. Bristol-Myers Squibb 1:10cv00264 Consolidation 1.0 Company et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. Abbott Laboratories et al v. 1:10cv00488 Consolidation 3.4 Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al Automated Transactions 1:10cv00691 Consolidation 31.9 LLC v. 7-Eleven Inc. et al Abbott Laboratories et al v. 1:10cv00766 Consolidation 1.6 Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al Abbott Laboratories et al v. 1:11cv00145 Consolidation 5.6 Sandoz Inc. Senju Pharmaceutical Co. 1:11cv00439 Consolidation 2.6 Ltd. et al v. Lupin Limited et al Apeldyn Corporation v. 1:11cv00581 Consolidation 11.7 Co. Ltd. et al Senju Pharmaceutical Co. 1:11cv00926 Consolidation 3.9 Ltd. et al v. Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co. Inc. 36 Consolidation There was/were 59 case(s) terminated by Consolidation. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 5.5. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Consolidation 10

8

6

4 Number of Cases

2

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 14 23 32 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Senju Pharmaceutical Co. 1:11cv01059 Consolidation 3.3 Ltd. et al v. Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co. Inc. Cephalon Inc. et al v. Mylan 1:11cv01111 Consolidation 0.9 Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al Cephalon Inc. v. Mylan 1:12cv00073 Consolidation 0.7 Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al Cephalon Inc. v. Mylan 1:12cv00247 Consolidation 0.4 Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al Pfizer Inc. et al v. Teva 1:12cv00815 Consolidation 3.4 Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. AbbVie Inc. et al v. Amneal 1:12cv01088 Consolidation 3.3 Pharmaceuticals LLC. et al Forest Laboratories Inc. et al 1:13cv01605 Consolidation 5.8 v. Mylan Inc. et al Forest Laboratories Inc. et al 1:13cv01606 Consolidation 5.8 v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc. Forest Laboratories, LLC et 1:14cv01266 Consolidation 4.1 al v. Hikma Pharmaceuticals LLC et al Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi et al 1:14cv01349 Consolidation 1.6 Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi et al 1:14cv01393 Consolidation 1.1 Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi et al 1:14cv01414 Consolidation 0.9 Forest Laboratories LLC et 1:14cv01504 Consolidation 1.4 al v. Breckenridge Pharmaceutical Inc. Forest Laboratories LLC et 1:15cv00158 Consolidation 1.2 al v. Alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al Forest Laboratories LLC et 1:15cv00430 Consolidation 4.1 al v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC et al Pfizer Inc. et al v. Mylan 1:15cv00960 Consolidation 13.8 Laboratories Ltd. et al 37 Consolidation There was/were 59 case(s) terminated by Consolidation. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 5.5. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Consolidation 10

8

6

4 Number of Cases

2

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 14 23 32 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

OSI Pharmaceuticals, LLC 1:15cv01063 Consolidation 3.0 et al v. Breckenridge Pharmaceutical Inc. et al

38 Lack of Jurisdiction There was/were 22 case(s) terminated by Lack of Jurisdiction. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 13.1. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Lack of Jurisdiction 5

4

3

2 Number of Cases

1

0 5 6 7 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 27 34 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

PE Corporation, et al v. 1:00cv00629 Lack of Jurisdiction 14.8 Affymetrix, Inc. DuPont Dow Elastomer v. 1:00cv00822 Lack of Jurisdiction 9.1 Greene Tweed of DE Abbott Laboratories et al v. 1:06cv00613 Lack of Jurisdiction 14.0 Johnson and Johnson Inc. et al Abbott Laboratories et al v. 1:07cv00259 Lack of Jurisdiction 6.5 Johnson and Johnson Inc. et al Innovative Therapies Inc. v. 1:07cv00589 Lack of Jurisdiction 13.4 Kinetic Concepts Inc. et al Hewlett-Packard Company 1:07cv00650 Lack of Jurisdiction 16.8 v. Acceleron LLC Human Genome Sciences 1:07cv00780 Lack of Jurisdiction 5.4 Inc. v. Immunex Corp. et al Edmunds Holding Company 1:08cv00149 Lack of Jurisdiction 11.3 et al v. Autobytel Inc. Boston Scientific 1:08cv00489 Lack of Jurisdiction 12.6 Corporation et al v. Wall Cardiovascular Technologies LLC Andrew LLC v. TruePosition 1:09cv00669 Lack of Jurisdiction 6.7 Inc. Walker Digital LLC v. 1:11cv00313 Lack of Jurisdiction 26.3 Expedia Inc. et al Mayfair Wireless LLC v. 1:11cv00772 Lack of Jurisdiction 33.1 Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless et al Walker Digital LLC v. 1:12cv00140 Lack of Jurisdiction 16.4 Amazon.com Inc. Walker Digital LLC v. Barnes 1:12cv00141 Lack of Jurisdiction 16.4 & Noble Inc. Walker Digital LLC v. 1:12cv00142 Lack of Jurisdiction 16.4 Expedia Inc. 39 Lack of Jurisdiction There was/were 22 case(s) terminated by Lack of Jurisdiction. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 13.1. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Lack of Jurisdiction 5

4

3

2 Number of Cases

1

0 5 6 7 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 27 34 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Butamax (TM) Advanced 1:12cv01301 Lack of Jurisdiction 15.7 Biofuels LLC et al v. Gevo Inc. NCR Corporation v. 1:14cv00779 Lack of Jurisdiction 9.3 Automated Transactions LLC et al Nautilus Hyosung America 1:14cv01189 Lack of Jurisdiction 6.5 Inc. v. Automated Transactions LLC et al Purdue Pharma LP et al v. 1:15cv00260 Lack of Jurisdiction 4.4 Collegium Pharmaceutical Inc. Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Sprint 1:15cv00431 Lack of Jurisdiction 8.8 Communications Company L.P. Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Sprint 1:15cv00432 Lack of Jurisdiction 8.8 Communications Company L.P. DNA Genotek Inc. v. 1:15cv00661 Lack of Jurisdiction 16.5 Spectrum DNA et al

40 MDL Transfer There was/were 9 case(s) terminated by MDL Transfer. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 4.6. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For MDL Transfer 2

1.6

1.2

0.8 Number of Cases

0.4

0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Laughlin Products v. 1:02cv00582 MDL Transfer 6.7 Chisholm, et al Laughlin Products v. 1:02cv01608 MDL Transfer 3.8 Johnson, et al Astrazeneca AB, et al v. Eon 1:04cv00205 MDL Transfer 4.7 Labs Inc. Agfa Corp., et al v. 1:04cv00818 MDL Transfer 7.7 Compression Labs Inc, et al AstraZeneca AB, et al v. 1:04cv00891 MDL Transfer 2.3 Andrx Pharmaceutical, et al Yahoo Inc. v. Compression 1:04cv00918 MDL Transfer 6.7 Labs Inc, et al Audiovox Corporation, et al 1:04cv01293 MDL Transfer 5.2 v. Compression Labs Inc, et al AstraZeneca AB, et al v. 1:04cv01533 MDL Transfer 1.6 Andrx Pharmaceutical, et al Forest Laboratories Inc. et al 1:12cv00305 MDL Transfer 3.0 v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al

41 Other Settlement There was/were 3 case(s) terminated by Other Settlement. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 27.4. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Other Settlement 1

0.8

0.6

0.4 Number of Cases

0.2

0 19 30 35 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

British Telecomm. v. Level 3 1:03cv00530 Other Settlement 18.2 Comm Inc., et al LEO Pharma A/S v. Tolmar 1:10cv00269 Other Settlement 34.3 Inc. LEO Pharma A/S v. Tolmar 1:10cv00715 Other Settlement 29.6 Inc.

42 Other Termination There was/were 11 case(s) terminated by Other Termination. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 22.9. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Other Termination 2

1.6

1.2

0.8 Number of Cases

0.4

0 6 14 17 21 30 42 45 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Ferring BV v. Teva 1:04cv00884 Other Termination 41.9 Pharmaceuticals, et al Lingamfelter v. Coca-Cola 1:04cv01261 Other Termination 41.4 Enterprise, et al Guardian Industries v. Dell 1:05cv00027 Other Termination 44.5 Inc., et al Takeda Pharmaceutical 1:09cv00917 Other Termination 20.2 Company LTD. et al v. Watson Laboratories Inc. - Florida et al Allergan Inc. v. Sandoz Inc. 1:10cv00024 Other Termination 20.4 Inc. et al v. 1:11cv00623 Other Termination 13.5 Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al Takeda Pharmaceuticals 1:12cv00419 Other Termination 29.6 U.S.A. Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc. Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01333 Other Termination 16.1 v. StarTech.com Ltd. et al Activision TV Inc. v. National 1:13cv00853 Other Termination 13.0 CineMedia LLC Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. et 1:15cv00698 Other Termination 5.5 al v. TWi Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. et 1:15cv00710 Other Termination 5.3 al v. TWi Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al

43 Remand to State Court There was/were 1 case(s) terminated by Remand to State Court. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 28.1. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Remand to State Court 1

0.8

0.6

0.4 Number of Cases

0.2

0 29 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Bio-Technology Gen. v. 1:02cv00235 Remand to State Court 28.1 Novo Nordisk A/S, et al

44 Transfer There was/were 23 case(s) terminated by Transfer. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 7.3. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Transfer 5

4

3

2 Number of Cases

1

0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 24 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Air Products v. MG Nitrogen 1:00cv00457 Transfer 9.8 Services, et al Original Creatine v. Kaizen 1:02cv00471 Transfer 7.7 Inc. Miteq Inc. v. Comtech 1:02cv01336 Transfer 5.8 Telecomm. Genfoot Inc. v. Payless 1:03cv00398 Transfer 7.5 Shoesource AstraZeneca AB, et al v. 1:04cv00080 Transfer 6.7 Andrx Pharmaceutical, et al Sumitomo Mitsubishi, et al v. 1:04cv00852 Transfer 10.1 MEMC Electronic Finkelstein v. Mardkha, et al 1:04cv01423 Transfer 2.0 Chih-Wen Chung v. 1:04cv01451 Transfer 6.5 Lumatec Industries Arrow Communication 1:05cv00357 Transfer 4.8 Laboratories Inc. v. John Mezzalingua Associates Inc. Ablaise Ltd. et al v. Bank of 1:06cv00530 Transfer 6.9 America Corporation Riverbed Technology Inc. v. 1:08cv00016 Transfer 1.6 Quantum Corporation et al Motorola Inc. v. Research In 1:08cv00104 Transfer 6.5 Motion Limited et al Belden Technologies Inc. v. 1:08cv00823 Transfer 23.7 LS Corp. et al Synthes (USA) v. Spinal 1:08cv00838 Transfer 3.9 Kinetics Inc. FuzzySharp Technologies 1:09cv00872 Transfer 4.6 Incorporated v. Nvidia Corporation et al Brinkmeier v. Exergen 1:10cv00176 Transfer 10.1 Corporation 45 Transfer There was/were 23 case(s) terminated by Transfer. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 7.3. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Transfer 5

4

3

2 Number of Cases

1

0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 24 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Medicis Pharmaceutical 1:10cv00419 Transfer 10.4 Corporation v. Nycomed US Inc. et al Medicis Pharmaceutical 1:10cv01099 Transfer 6.0 Corporation v. Nycomed US Inc. Fuisz Pharma LLC v. 1:11cv01061 Transfer 7.2 Theranos Inc. Fortinet Inc. v. FireEye Inc. 1:12cv01066 Transfer 8.8 Ponziani v. Ford Motor 1:14cv00266 Transfer 1.9 Company et al CO2 Solutions Inc. v. 1:15cv01123 Transfer 4.3 Akermin Inc. Mitchell Ellis Products, Inc. 1:16cv00367 Transfer 9.9 v. Agrinomix LLC

46 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Intl Bus Machines v. Informix 1:00cv00073 Voluntary Dismissal 17.9 Corp. Matsushita Electric v. 1:00cv00143 Voluntary Dismissal 28.6 Inverness Medical, et al Color Kinetics Inc. v. Polaris 1:00cv00160 Voluntary Dismissal 4.0 Pool Systems Softspikes Inc. v. Sure Grip 1:00cv00398 Voluntary Dismissal 11.9 Inc. Axiohm IPB Inc. v. 1:00cv00420 Voluntary Dismissal 16.1 America Inc., et al Edwards Lifesciences v. 1:00cv00621 Voluntary Dismissal 21.8 Medtronic Inc. Agilent Technologies v. 1:00cv00942 Voluntary Dismissal 5.9 Methode Electronics, et al Europaisches Lab v. ISIS 1:00cv00962 Voluntary Dismissal 12.0 Pharmaceuticals Housey Pharmaceutica, et al 1:00cv01002 Voluntary Dismissal 11.0 v. Boehringer-Ingelheim, et al Monsanto Company, et al v. 1:00cv01013 Voluntary Dismissal 34.6 Bayer Cropscience, et al IQE (Europe) Ltd., et al v. 1:00cv01069 Voluntary Dismissal 21.3 Rockwell Tech., et al Pharmacia Corp., et al v. 1:01cv00070 Voluntary Dismissal 20.5 Alcon Laboratories Allergan Inc., et al v. 1:01cv00141 Voluntary Dismissal 20.1 Pharmacia Corp., et al Proxim Incorporated v. 1:01cv00155 Voluntary Dismissal 25.2 3Com Corporation, et al Genentech Inc. v. Genzyme 1:01cv00168 Voluntary Dismissal 20.9 Corporation Cypress Semiconduct v. 1:01cv00178 Voluntary Dismissal 8.8 Philips Semiconduct Jupiter Media Metrix v. 1:01cv00193 Voluntary Dismissal 13.4 47 NetRatings, Inc Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Cypress Semiconduct, et al 1:01cv00199 Voluntary Dismissal 16.6 v. Integrated Circuit Xicor Inc. v. Catalyst 1:01cv00256 Voluntary Dismissal 14.1 Semiconduct Sandretto Industrie, et al v. 1:01cv00328 Voluntary Dismissal 4.4 Milacron Inc. Integrated Device v. GSI 1:01cv00393 Voluntary Dismissal 13.9 Technology, et al Photonetics Inc., et al v. 1:01cv00493 Voluntary Dismissal 17.8 New Focus Inc. Outdoor Optics Inc. v. Bacou 1:01cv00533 Voluntary Dismissal 5.1 USA Inc. ONDEO Nalco Company v. 1:01cv00537 Voluntary Dismissal 26.6 EKA Chemicals, Inc. Edwards Lifesciences, et al 1:01cv00628 Voluntary Dismissal 7.2 v. Medtronic Inc. Invitrogen v. Incyte 1:01cv00692 Voluntary Dismissal 56.3 Genomics Inc. Nippon Carbon Co LTD v. 1:01cv00726 Voluntary Dismissal 17.1 Nucor Corporation Pharmacia Corp., et al v. 1:01cv00835 Voluntary Dismissal 2.4 Par Pharmaceutical Corning Lasertron v. 1:01cv00838 Voluntary Dismissal 9.9 Rockwell Intl Corp., et al Matsushita Electric v. 1:01cv00882 Voluntary Dismissal 30.8 Cinram International, et al CertCo Inc. v. PayPal Inc. 1:02cv00094 Voluntary Dismissal 2.7 Pure Technologies v. 1:02cv00138 Voluntary Dismissal 26.4 Physical Acoustics Rockwell Tech LLC v. 1:02cv00338 Voluntary Dismissal 5.4 Corning Inc., et al Original Creatine v. 1:02cv00366 Voluntary Dismissal 29.3 Muscletech Research ONDEO Nalco Company v. 1:02cv00467 Voluntary Dismissal 17.0 48 EKA Chemicals Inc. Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Edwards Lifesciences, et al 1:02cv00508 Voluntary Dismissal 19.7 v. Sulzer Carbomedics Inline Connection v. Verizon 1:02cv00545 Voluntary Dismissal 3.7 Comm Inc. Applied Separations v. 1:02cv01253 Voluntary Dismissal 11.1 Dionex Corporation Pharmacia Corp., et al v. 1:02cv01344 Voluntary Dismissal 2.5 Alcon Laboratories Original Creatine v. 1:02cv01365 Voluntary Dismissal 18.1 Optimum Nutrition Pharmacia Corp., et al v. 1:02cv01381 Voluntary Dismissal 2.7 Allergan Inc., et al National Steel Ltd. v. 1:02cv01427 Voluntary Dismissal 20.2 Greenbrier Companies, et al Peer-To-Peer Systems v. 1:02cv01465 Voluntary Dismissal 14.8 Cybiko Inc. Seikoh Giken Ltd., et al v. 1:02cv01483 Voluntary Dismissal 14.4 Domaille Engineering Abbott Laboratories, et al v. 1:02cv01512 Voluntary Dismissal 74.3 Teva Pharmaceuticals Symbol Technologies v. 1:03cv00102 Voluntary Dismissal 24.8 Hand Held Products, et al Peer-To-Peer Systems v. 1:03cv00115 Voluntary Dismissal 24.6 Palm, Inc., et al Abbott Laboratories, et al v. 1:03cv00120 Voluntary Dismissal 70.8 Impax Laboratories Honeywell Intl Inc, et al v. 1:03cv00183 Voluntary Dismissal 6.7 Electrolux Home, et al NetRatings Inc. v. NPD 1:03cv00295 Voluntary Dismissal 13.9 Group Inc. Lab Corp of America, et al v. 1:03cv00364 Voluntary Dismissal 19.7 Chiron Corporation Medtronic Vascular v. Cordis 1:03cv00402 Voluntary Dismissal 40.4 Corporation 49 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Braintree Lab v. Schwarz 1:03cv00477 Voluntary Dismissal 12.6 Pharma Inc. Whatman PLC v. Schuell 1:03cv00478 Voluntary Dismissal 18.8 Inc. British Telecomm. v. SBC 1:03cv00526 Voluntary Dismissal 16.1 Communications, et al British Telecomm. v. Qwest 1:03cv00527 Voluntary Dismissal 19.2 Comm Intl Inc., et al British Telecomm. v. Verizon 1:03cv00528 Voluntary Dismissal 14.3 Comm., et al British Telecomm. v. 1:03cv00531 Voluntary Dismissal 5.8 Broadwing Comm Serv., et al Intel Corporation v. 1:03cv00726 Voluntary Dismissal 1.3 Broadcom Corporation Edwards Lifesciences, et al 1:03cv00887 Voluntary Dismissal 4.3 v. Carbomedics Inc. Guardian Industries v. 1:03cv00934 Voluntary Dismissal 16.1 Samsung Electronics, et al Tenneco Automotive v. 1:03cv01030 Voluntary Dismissal 21.2 Visteon Corporation Boston Sci Scimed, et al v. 1:03cv01138 Voluntary Dismissal 40.8 Cordis Corporation, et al KBA-GIORI v. Giesecke & 1:04cv00021 Voluntary Dismissal 12.3 Devrient Level 3 Comm LLC v. British 1:04cv00063 Voluntary Dismissal 5.9 Telecomm. Guidant Corporation, et al v. 1:04cv00067 Voluntary Dismissal 41.0 St Jude Medical Inc., et al Smithkline Beecham, et al v. 1:04cv00107 Voluntary Dismissal 12.9 Perrigo Company Emulex Design, et al v. 1:04cv00118 Voluntary Dismissal 4.1 Qlogic Corporation Syngenta Seeds Inc. v. 1:04cv00228 Voluntary Dismissal 7.6 50 Monsanto Company, et al Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

KBA-GIORI v. Giesecke & 1:04cv00244 Voluntary Dismissal 9.0 Devrient Syngenta Seeds Inc. v. 1:04cv00269 Voluntary Dismissal 7.1 Monsanto Company, et al , LLC v. 1:04cv00418 Voluntary Dismissal 21.8 Cornice Inc. Turn of the Century v. SIG 1:04cv00424 Voluntary Dismissal 6.4 Combibloc Inc. LML Patent Corp. v. 1:04cv00858 Voluntary Dismissal 20.7 Telecheck Services, et al McKesson Information v. 1:04cv01258 Voluntary Dismissal 24.0 Trizetto Group Inc. BTG Intl Inc. v. Amazon.com 1:04cv01264 Voluntary Dismissal 21.7 Inc., et al Scieran Tech. Inc. v. Bausch 1:04cv01319 Voluntary Dismissal 15.2 & Lomb Lancaster Composite v. 1:04cv01414 Voluntary Dismissal 27.3 Hardcore Composites, et al BioPay LLC v. Solidus 1:05cv00025 Voluntary Dismissal 12.5 Networks Inc, et al Ltd. v. Borgwarner 1:05cv00048 Voluntary Dismissal 26.1 Inc., et al Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. 1:05cv00147 Voluntary Dismissal 16.5 Intermec Technologies Corporation Turn of the Century Solution 1:05cv00158 Voluntary Dismissal 7.2 L.P. v. Federal Signal Corporation et al SRU Biosystems Inc. v. 1:05cv00201 Voluntary Dismissal 10.2 Hobbs et al Mars Electronics 1:05cv00239 Voluntary Dismissal 11.5 International, Inc. et al v. International Currency Technologies Corp. et al 51 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Stratagene Corporation v. 1:05cv00275 Voluntary Dismissal 21.3 Third Wave Technologies Inc. Alcatel USA Resources Inc. 1:05cv00418 Voluntary Dismissal 20.7 et al v. Foundry Networks Inc. SEZ Holding AG et al v. 1:05cv00552 Voluntary Dismissal 18.9 Applied Materials Inc. Hewlett-Packard Company 1:05cv00595 Voluntary Dismissal 8.0 v. SBC Laboratories Inc. et al Internet Media Corporation 1:05cv00633 Voluntary Dismissal 46.8 v. Dell Inc. et al Finisar Corporation v. 1:05cv00653 Voluntary Dismissal 10.3 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Boston Scientific 1:05cv00768 Voluntary Dismissal 18.9 Corporation et al v. Conor Medsystems Inc. Turn of the Century Solution 1:05cv00816 Voluntary Dismissal 12.7 L.P. v. International Rectifier Corporation Thales Airborne Systems 1:05cv00853 Voluntary Dismissal 15.9 S.A. et al v. Universal Avionics Systems Corporation Sentillion Inc. v. Carefx 1:06cv00013 Voluntary Dismissal 12.0 Corp. Teles AG 1:06cv00197 Voluntary Dismissal 43.2 Informationstechnologien v. Quintum Technologies LLC. Arcelor France v. Mittal Steel 1:06cv00307 Voluntary Dismissal 5.3 USA Inc. E.I. DuPont de Nemours and 1:06cv00316 Voluntary Dismissal 10.4 Company v. Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc. 52 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Tandberg Telecom AS v. 1:06cv00424 Voluntary Dismissal 3.2 Starbak Communications Inc. Quinstreet Inc. v. Parallel 1:06cv00495 Voluntary Dismissal 40.9 Networks, LLC ZymoGenetics Inc. v. 1:06cv00500 Voluntary Dismissal 26.9 Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. et al American Medical Systems 1:06cv00606 Voluntary Dismissal 5.0 Inc. et al v. Celsion Corporation Amberwave Systems 1:06cv00638 Voluntary Dismissal 4.5 Corporation v. Intel Corporation Southwest Airlines Co. v. 1:06cv00658 Voluntary Dismissal 4.2 Applied Interact LLC et al OSRAM GMBH et al v. 1:06cv00710 Voluntary Dismissal 7.9 Co. Ltd. et al USA Video Technolgy 1:06cv00737 Voluntary Dismissal 1.4 Corporation v. Time Warner Inc. et al Polaroid Corporation v. 1:06cv00738 Voluntary Dismissal 22.7 Hewlett-Packard Company Guardian Industries Corp. v. 1:06cv00748 Voluntary Dismissal 24.1 Innolux Display Corporation Corporation v. 1:07cv00090 Voluntary Dismissal 22.0 Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise et al Sun Optics Inc. v. FGX 1:07cv00137 Voluntary Dismissal 13.3 International Inc. Callaway Golf Company v. 1:07cv00367 Voluntary Dismissal 17.0 Acushnet Company Interdigital Communications 1:07cv00489 Voluntary Dismissal 117.3 LLC et al v. Nokia Corporation et al 53 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Aisin Seiki Co Ltd. v. 1:07cv00512 Voluntary Dismissal 6.6 BorgWarner Inc. et al Human Genome Sciences 1:07cv00526 Voluntary Dismissal 25.7 Inc. v. Amgen Inc. et al Purdue Pharma LP et al v. 1:07cv00549 Voluntary Dismissal 2.1 Apotex Inc. et al Elan Corporation PLC v. 1:07cv00552 Voluntary Dismissal 28.7 Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. MAM Babyartikel GmbH et 1:07cv00608 Voluntary Dismissal 21.1 al v. Luv n' Care Ltd. et al Cisco Systems Inc. et al v. 1:07cv00671 Voluntary Dismissal 10.8 GPNE Corp. ArthroCare Corporation v. 1:07cv00729 Voluntary Dismissal 25.7 Gyrus Medical Inc. et al Samsung Electronics Co. 1:07cv00843 Voluntary Dismissal 26.0 Ltd. v. et al Boehringer Ingelheim 1:08cv00065 Voluntary Dismissal 4.5 Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Apotex Inc. et al SmithKline Beecham 1:08cv00112 Voluntary Dismissal 26.4 Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline v. Barr Laboratories, Inc. Music Choice v. Viacom Inc. 1:08cv00130 Voluntary Dismissal 15.1 et al Kwikset Corporation et al v. 1:08cv00170 Voluntary Dismissal 16.5 Master Lock LLC JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al 1:08cv00189 Voluntary Dismissal 22.2 v. Affiliated Computer Services Inc. et al CRS LLC v. Reflexive 1:08cv00200 Voluntary Dismissal 3.2 Entertainment Inc. 54 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Hilite International Inc. v. 1:08cv00287 Voluntary Dismissal 11.9 BorgWarner Inc. et al Oxford Gene Technology IP 1:08cv00320 Voluntary Dismissal 5.7 Limited v. BioArray Solutions Ltd. W. Neudorff GmbH KG v. 1:08cv00333 Voluntary Dismissal 4.1 Falcon Lab LLC Motivation Innovations LLC 1:08cv00334 Voluntary Dismissal 17.5 v. DSW Inc. et al Takeda Pharmaceutical 1:08cv00339 Voluntary Dismissal 27.8 Company Limited et al v. Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al StreamServe AB v. 1:08cv00343 Voluntary Dismissal 19.4 Exstream Software LLC et al Cephalon Inc. et al v. Barr 1:08cv00455 Voluntary Dismissal 27.8 Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al Novartis Corporation et al v. 1:08cv00459 Voluntary Dismissal 23.5 Teva Parenteral Medicines Inc. et al Wilco AG v. Packaging 1:08cv00635 Voluntary Dismissal 19.1 Technologies & Inspection LLC NMT Medical Inc. et al v. 1:08cv00790 Voluntary Dismissal 14.4 W.L. Gore & Associates Inc. Spansion LLC v. Samsung 1:08cv00855 Voluntary Dismissal 31.1 Electronics Co. Ltd. et al Infineon Technologies AG et 1:08cv00887 Voluntary Dismissal 13.3 al v. Fairchild Semiconductor International Inc. et al Auxilium Pharmaceuticals 1:08cv00908 Voluntary Dismissal 71.3 Inc. et al v. Upsher-Smith Laboratories Inc. Eurand Inc. et al v. Impax 1:09cv00018 Voluntary Dismissal 21.1 55 Laboratories Inc. Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Xpoint Technologies Inc. v. 1:09cv00026 Voluntary Dismissal 29.2 Farstone Technology Inc. et al Sigram Schindler 1:09cv00072 Voluntary Dismissal 74.5 Beteiligungsgesellschaft v. Cisco Systems Inc. British Telecommunications 1:09cv00107 Voluntary Dismissal 16.1 plc v. Freescale Semiconductor Inc. Acushnet Company v. 1:09cv00130 Voluntary Dismissal 37.8 Callaway Golf Company Callaway Golf Company v. 1:09cv00131 Voluntary Dismissal 37.8 Acushnet Company Stiefel Laboratories Inc. et al 1:09cv00167 Voluntary Dismissal 19.5 v. Cobrek Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al British Telecommunications 1:09cv00203 Voluntary Dismissal 14.6 plc v. Texas Instruments Incorporated Eidos Communications LLC 1:09cv00234 Voluntary Dismissal 40.2 et al v. Skype Technologies SA et al Tyco Healthcare Group LP v. 1:09cv00264 Voluntary Dismissal 35.1 CR Bard Inc. et al Novartis Pharmaceuticals 1:09cv00291 Voluntary Dismissal 17.6 Corporation et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. Novartis Pharmaceuticals 1:09cv00292 Voluntary Dismissal 18.1 Corporation et al v. Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al Novartis Pharmaceuticals 1:09cv00294 Voluntary Dismissal 18.3 Corporation et al v. Anchen Pharmaceuticals Inc. Pronova BioPharma Norge 1:09cv00304 Voluntary Dismissal 23.0 AS v. Apotex Corp. et al 56 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Stiefel Laboratories Inc. v. 1:09cv00376 Voluntary Dismissal 4.6 KV Pharmaceutical Company Human Genome Sciences 1:09cv00389 Voluntary Dismissal 4.8 Inc. v. Immunex Corporation et al BASF Plant Science GmbH 1:09cv00392 Voluntary Dismissal 7.5 et al v. Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc. et al Pioneer Hi-Bred 1:09cv00393 Voluntary Dismissal 7.5 International Inc. et al v. BASF Corporation et al Synchrome Technology Inc. 1:09cv00443 Voluntary Dismissal 18.7 v. Pioneer Electronics (USA) Inc. et al Takeda Pharmaceutical 1:09cv00499 Voluntary Dismissal 1.2 Company Limited et al v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited et al Congoleum Corporation v. 1:09cv00522 Voluntary Dismissal 10.0 Tarkett Enterprises Inc. et al Arbitron Inc. v. Digimarc 1:09cv00604 Voluntary Dismissal 7.3 Corporation LadaTech LLC v. Illumina 1:09cv00627 Voluntary Dismissal 35.3 Inc. Xpoint Technologies Inc. v. 1:09cv00628 Voluntary Dismissal 23.6 Cypress Semiconductor Corporation et al Congoleum Corporation v. 1:09cv00631 Voluntary Dismissal 7.9 Cryntel Enterprises Ltd. Inc. Celgro Corporation v. 1:09cv00639 Voluntary Dismissal 5.2 Cambrex Corporation Company LTD et al v. 1:09cv00694 Voluntary Dismissal 26.8 Oki Data Corporation et al Ricoh Company Ltd. et al v. 1:09cv00695 Voluntary Dismissal 26.8 57 Oki Data Corporation et al Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Fairchild Semiconductor 1:09cv00739 Voluntary Dismissal 3.0 Corporation v. Infineon Technologies AG et al Congoleum Corporation v. 1:09cv00757 Voluntary Dismissal 5.7 Metroflor Corporation et al BASF Catalysts LLC v. 1:09cv00761 Voluntary Dismissal 7.0 Johnson Matthey Inc et al Cephalon Inc. v. Barr 1:09cv00794 Voluntary Dismissal 12.8 Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al Drager Medical GmbH et al 1:09cv00811 Voluntary Dismissal 13.5 v. Maquet Inc. et al Verizon Clinton Center Drive 1:09cv00823 Voluntary Dismissal 4.2 Corp. v. EON Corporation Takeda Pharmaceutical 1:09cv00841 Voluntary Dismissal 21.1 Company LTD. et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et al Accenture Global Services 1:09cv00848 Voluntary Dismissal 19.4 GmbH et al v. Guidewire Software Inc. Sidergas SpA v. Lincoln 1:09cv00905 Voluntary Dismissal 6.9 Electric Company Inc. et al Konarka Technologies Inc. 1:09cv00916 Voluntary Dismissal 19.8 et al Bristol-Myers Squibb 1:09cv00919 Voluntary Dismissal 22.7 Company et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. Samsung Electronics Co. 1:09cv00920 Voluntary Dismissal 2.3 Ltd. v. Sharp Corporation et al Delta Air Lines Inc. v. 1:09cv00941 Voluntary Dismissal 21.2 Applied Interact LLC LG Household & Healthcare 1:09cv00944 Voluntary Dismissal 7.2 Ltd. v. Procter & Gamble Company 58 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

KANA Software Inc. v. 1:09cv00975 Voluntary Dismissal 15.5 Versata Enterprises Inc. et al KANA Software Inc. v 1:09cv00982 Voluntary Dismissal 15.5 Versata Enterprises Inc. et al Zodiac Pool Care Inc. v. 1:10cv00016 Voluntary Dismissal 23.4 Aquatron Inc. et al Abbott Laboratories et al v. 1:10cv00057 Voluntary Dismissal 24.7 Watson Laboratories Inc. - Florida AbbVie Inc. et al v. Sun 1:10cv00112 Voluntary Dismissal 36.6 Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al Cephalon Inc. et al v. 1:10cv00123 Voluntary Dismissal 29.9 Sandoz Inc. Bayer Schering Pharma AG 1:10cv00127 Voluntary Dismissal 15.6 et al v. Lupin Ltd. et al Acceleron, LLC v. 1:10cv00128 Voluntary Dismissal 13.3 Hewlett-Packard Co., et al Verizon Clinton Center Drive 1:10cv00179 Voluntary Dismissal 8.0 Corp. v. EON Corporation Abbott Laboratories et al v. 1:10cv00302 Voluntary Dismissal 20.7 Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd et al Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. 1:10cv00306 Voluntary Dismissal 6.1 et al v. Eurand Inc. et al Medicis Pharmaceutical 1:10cv00359 Voluntary Dismissal 4.8 Corporation v. Taro Pharmaceutical USA Inc. et al Abbott Laboratories et al v. 1:10cv00373 Voluntary Dismissal 21.4 Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al Fox Ridge LLC v. L-1 1:10cv00395 Voluntary Dismissal 18.1 Identity Solutions Inc. 59 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Salient Surgical 1:10cv00494 Voluntary Dismissal 9.0 Technologies Inc. et al v. Bovie Medical Corporation AbbVie Inc. et al v. Sandoz 1:10cv00538 Voluntary Dismissal 33.0 Inc. Abbott Laboratories et al v. 1:10cv00559 Voluntary Dismissal 21.7 Mylan Inc. et al British Telecommunications 1:10cv00658 Voluntary Dismissal 43.2 plc v. Coxcom Inc. et al Minkus Electronic Display 1:10cv00666 Voluntary Dismissal 20.3 Systems Inc. v. Premier Retail Networks Inc. et al Internet Media Corporation 1:10cv00690 Voluntary Dismissal 24.9 v. Hearst Newspapers LLC Versata Software Inc. et al v. 1:10cv00781 Voluntary Dismissal 17.7 Callidus Software Inc. Pronova BioPharma Norge 1:10cv00800 Voluntary Dismissal 10.2 AS v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. Pronova BioPharma Norge 1:10cv00801 Voluntary Dismissal 10.2 AS v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc. et al Round Rock Research LLC. 1:10cv00840 Voluntary Dismissal 6.3 v. HTC Corporation et al Marvell International Ltd. v. 1:10cv00869 Voluntary Dismissal 13.8 Link A Media Devices Corp CSR plc v. Broadcom 1:10cv00876 Voluntary Dismissal 3.1 Corporation Everglades Interactive LLC 1:10cv00902 Voluntary Dismissal 13.8 v. Playfish Ltd et al Triax Pharmaceuticals LLC 1:10cv00946 Voluntary Dismissal 5.4 et al v. Glenmark Generics Inc USA et al

60 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Graphics Properties 1:10cv00992 Voluntary Dismissal 5.4 Holdings Inc. v. Dell Inc. et al Abbott Laboratories et al v. 1:10cv01029 Voluntary Dismissal 21.6 Impax Laboratories Inc. Cellectis S.A. v. Precision 1:10cv01033 Voluntary Dismissal 11.0 Biosciences Inc. NetMonitor LLC v. 1:10cv01061 Voluntary Dismissal 15.2 Compuware Corporation et al Intellectual Ventures I LLC et 1:10cv01066 Voluntary Dismissal 22.1 al v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc. et al Pronova BioPharma Norge 1:11cv00012 Voluntary Dismissal 2.8 AS v. Apotex Corp. et al Pfizer Inc. et al v. Sandoz 1:11cv00023 Voluntary Dismissal 9.7 Inc. Avago Technologies U S Inc. 1:11cv00071 Voluntary Dismissal 10.4 et al v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation et al Sharp Corporation v. AU 1:11cv00077 Voluntary Dismissal 3.1 Optronics Corp. et al Novartis Vaccines and 1:11cv00084 Voluntary Dismissal 36.3 Diagnostics Inc. et al. v. Biogen Idec Inc. et al SRI International Inc. v. 1:11cv00131 Voluntary Dismissal 14.6 Symantec Corporation Cellectis S.A. v. Precision 1:11cv00173 Voluntary Dismissal 35.1 Biosciences Inc. Siemens Medical Solutions 1:11cv00167 Voluntary Dismissal 4.0 USA, Inc. v. Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland) Inc. Alloqate LLC v. DealBase 1:11cv00403 Voluntary Dismissal 7.9 Corporation et al 61 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Abbott Laboratories et al v. 1:11cv00239 Voluntary Dismissal 9.5 Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al Abbott Laboratories et al v. 1:11cv00251 Voluntary Dismissal 10.7 Watson Laboratories Inc. - Florida Alkermes Pharma Ireland 1:11cv00255 Voluntary Dismissal 17.4 Limited v. Intellipharmaceutics Corporation et al Eurand Inc. et al v. TWi 1:11cv00268 Voluntary Dismissal 28.1 Pharmaceuticals Inc. Alkermes Pharma Ireland 1:11cv00281 Voluntary Dismissal 8.9 Limited v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. Alcon Pharmaceuticals Ltd 1:11cv00293 Voluntary Dismissal 45.5 et al v. Watson Laboratories Inc. et al Resonant Biotechnologies 1:11cv00303 Voluntary Dismissal 26.6 LLC v. Corning Inc. et al Walker Digital LLC v. 1:11cv00309 Voluntary Dismissal 46.6 Google Inc. et al. Walker Digital LLC v. 1:11cv00315 Voluntary Dismissal 23.1 Amazon.com Inc. et al Walker Digital LLC v 1:11cv00322 Voluntary Dismissal 33.1 Microsoft Corporation W. L. Gore & 1:11cv00346 Voluntary Dismissal 25.8 Associates Inc. v. EMD Millipore Corporation Alkermes Pharma Ireland 1:11cv00367 Voluntary Dismissal 15.9 Limited v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. Crayola LLC v. C2C 1:11cv00389 Voluntary Dismissal 5.5 Technologies LLC 62 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Alkermes Pharma Ireland 1:11cv00480 Voluntary Dismissal 15.4 Limited v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc. OSRAM GMBH v. Samsung 1:11cv00496 Voluntary Dismissal 15.2 Electronics Co Ltd et al Kenexa BrassRing Inc. v. 1:11cv00517 Voluntary Dismissal 1.3 Taleo Corporation Sudmo Holding GmbH v. 1:11cv00561 Voluntary Dismissal 57.0 SPX Corporation et al Alcon Pharmaceuticals Ltd 1:11cv00587 Voluntary Dismissal 27.3 et al v. Lupin Ltd. et al Mosaid Technologies Inc. v. 1:11cv00598 Voluntary Dismissal 27.8 HTC America Inc. Abbott Laboratories et al v. 1:11cv00607 Voluntary Dismissal 7.2 Watson Laboratories Inc. - Florida Samsung LED Co Ltd. v. 1:11cv00630 Voluntary Dismissal 13.9 OSRAM GmbH et al Purdue Pharmaceutical 1:11cv00695 Voluntary Dismissal 12.0 Products L.P. et al v. Hikma (Maple) Ltd. et al Abbott Laboratories et al v. 1:11cv00712 Voluntary Dismissal 4.7 Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et al EI DuPont De Nemours and 1:11cv00773 Voluntary Dismissal 25.9 Company v. Heraeus Precious Metals North America Conshohocken LLC Intellectual Ventures I LLC et 1:11cv00792 Voluntary Dismissal 51.9 al v. Canon Inc. et al Cephalon Inc. et al v. 1:11cv00821 Voluntary Dismissal 11.0 Sandoz Inc. CyberFone Systems LLC v. 1:11cv00827 Voluntary Dismissal 29.2 ZTE (USA) Inc. 63 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

CyberFone Systems LLC v. 1:11cv00828 Voluntary Dismissal 11.0 Charter Communications Holding Company LLC et al CyberFone Systems LLC v. 1:11cv00830 Voluntary Dismissal 36.1 Audiocodes Inc. et al LVL Patent Group LLC v. 1:11cv00832 Voluntary Dismissal 11.0 Vlingo Corporation et al CyberFone Systems LLC v. 1:11cv00833 Voluntary Dismissal 35.4 Vizio Inc. et al Cyberfone Systems LLC v. 1:11cv00834 Voluntary Dismissal 33.3 Federal Express Corporation et al CyberFone Systems LLC v. 1:11cv00835 Voluntary Dismissal 16.3 Echostar Technologies LLC et al Comcast Cable 1:11cv00843 Voluntary Dismissal 29.8 Communications LLC et al v. British Telecommunications plc Cellectis S.A. v. Precision 1:11cv00890 Voluntary Dismissal 28.1 Biosciences Inc. Aeritas LLC v. Alaska Air 1:11cv00967 Voluntary Dismissal 26.7 Group Inc. Aeritas LLC v. Continental 1:11cv00968 Voluntary Dismissal 26.7 Airlines Inc. Aeritas LLC v. Delta Airlines 1:11cv00969 Voluntary Dismissal 26.7 Inc. Aeritas LLC v. United 1:11cv00970 Voluntary Dismissal 26.7 Airlines Inc. Sensus USA Inc. v. Nxegen 1:11cv01000 Voluntary Dismissal 32.7 LLC et al Intellectual Ventures I LLC et 1:11cv01025 Voluntary Dismissal 42.8 al v. Corporation et al

64 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Teijin Limited et al v. 1:13cv01939 Voluntary Dismissal 29.4 Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited Alkermes Pharma Ireland 1:11cv01098 Voluntary Dismissal 5.9 Limited v. Actavis Inc. et al AbbVie Inc. et al v. Sandoz 1:11cv01113 Voluntary Dismissal 34.1 Inc. Alkermes Pharma Ireland 1:11cv01119 Voluntary Dismissal 16.4 Limited v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc. Alkermes Pharma Ireland 1:11cv01186 Voluntary Dismissal 8.6 Limited v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. Abbott Laboratories et al v. 1:11cv01190 Voluntary Dismissal 14.7 Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al Cequint Inc. v. Apple Inc. 1:11cv01224 Voluntary Dismissal 17.3 Juniper Networks Inc. v. 1:11cv01258 Voluntary Dismissal 29.3 Palo Alto Networks Inc. Aeritas LLC v. US Airways 1:11cv01267 Voluntary Dismissal 24.4 Group Inc. et al AbbVie Inc. et al v. Cadila 1:12cv00065 Voluntary Dismissal 18.8 Healthcare Limited et al Gevo Inc. v. Butamax(TM) 1:12cv00070 Voluntary Dismissal 15.4 Advanced Biofuels LLC et al Cephalon Inc. v. Sandoz Inc. 1:12cv00074 Voluntary Dismissal 6.7 Abbott Laboratories et al v. 1:12cv00103 Voluntary Dismissal 31.4 Sandoz Inc. CyberFone Systems LLC v. 1:12cv00107 Voluntary Dismissal 6.4 Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC CyberFone Systems LLC v. 1:12cv00110 Voluntary Dismissal 6.4 Bright House Networks LLC 65 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

CyberFone Systems LLC v. 1:12cv00109 Voluntary Dismissal 6.4 Cequel Communications LLC CyberFone Systems LLC v. 1:12cv00111 Voluntary Dismissal 6.4 Comcast Cable Communications LLC CyberFone Systems LLC v. 1:12cv00112 Voluntary Dismissal 6.4 Cable One Inc. CyberFone Systems LLC v. 1:12cv00113 Voluntary Dismissal 6.5 Charter Communications Holding Company LLC et al CyberFone Systems LLC v. 1:12cv00114 Voluntary Dismissal 6.4 CSC Holdings LLC CyberFone Systems LLC v. 1:12cv00115 Voluntary Dismissal 6.4 Cox Communications Inc. CyberFone Systems LLC v. 1:12cv00116 Voluntary Dismissal 6.4 Knology Inc. CyberFone Systems LLC v. 1:12cv00117 Voluntary Dismissal 6.4 Insight Communications Company, Inc. CyberFone Systems LLC v. 1:12cv00118 Voluntary Dismissal 6.4 RCN Telecom Services LLC CyberFone Systems LLC v. 1:12cv00119 Voluntary Dismissal 6.4 Mediacom Broadband LLC CyberFone Systems LLC v. 1:12cv00120 Voluntary Dismissal 6.4 Time Warner Cable Inc. YYZ LLC v Hewlett-Packard 1:12cv00168 Voluntary Dismissal 11.6 Company YYZ LLC v Software AG Inc. 1:12cv00169 Voluntary Dismissal 11.7 et al. YYZ LLC v TIBCO Software 1:12cv00170 Voluntary Dismissal 10.7 Inc. Cellectis S.A. v. Precision 1:12cv00204 Voluntary Dismissal 23.3 Biosciences Inc. 66 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

AbbVie Inc. et al v. Amneal 1:12cv00235 Voluntary Dismissal 11.6 Pharmaceuticals LLC et al Cephalon Inc. v. Sandoz Inc. 1:12cv00248 Voluntary Dismissal 5.5 AbbVie Inc. et al v. Mylan 1:12cv00257 Voluntary Dismissal 23.1 Inc. et al American Registry LLC v. 1:12cv00262 Voluntary Dismissal 11.8 Showmark Media LLC Butamax(TM) Advanced 1:12cv00298 Voluntary Dismissal 41.8 Biofuels LLC v. Gevo Inc. Gevo Inc. v. Butamax (TM) 1:12cv00301 Voluntary Dismissal 41.7 Advanced Biofuels LLC et al Varia Holdings LLC v. 1:12cv00320 Voluntary Dismissal 12.7 Research in Motion Corporation et al AbbVie Inc. et al v. Watson 1:12cv00324 Voluntary Dismissal 17.9 Laboratories Inc. - Florida Alkermes Pharma Ireland 1:12cv00323 Voluntary Dismissal 8.6 Limited v. Actavis Inc. et al Acronis International GmbH 1:12cv00372 Voluntary Dismissal 24.8 et al v. Symantec Corporation Video Streaming Solutions 1:12cv00401 Voluntary Dismissal 3.1 LLC v. Cisco Systems Inc. Gevo Inc. v. Butamax (TM) 1:12cv00448 Voluntary Dismissal 40.8 Advanced Biofuels LLC et al Computer Software 1:12cv00452 Voluntary Dismissal 20.3 Protection LLC v. Autodesk Inc. Computer Software 1:12cv00454 Voluntary Dismissal 23.7 Protection LLC v. Nuance Communications Inc. Computer Software 1:12cv00455 Voluntary Dismissal 27.9 Protection LLC v. Wolfram Research Inc. 67 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

OSI Pharmaceuticals LLC et 1:12cv00465 Voluntary Dismissal 17.1 al v. Roxane Laboratories Inc. Golden Bridge Technology 1:12cv00474 Voluntary Dismissal 7.1 Inc. v. Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. Rovi Corporation et al v. LG 1:12cv00545 Voluntary Dismissal 10.2 Electronics Inc. et al Rovi Corporation et al v. 1:12cv00546 Voluntary Dismissal 9.0 VIZIO Inc. Rovi Corporation et al v. 1:12cv00547 Voluntary Dismissal 9.7 Corp. et al Round Rock Research LLC 1:12cv00569 Voluntary Dismissal 34.8 v. Sandisk Corporation Novartis Pharmaceuticals 1:12cv00595 Voluntary Dismissal 5.8 Corporation v. Lupin Ltd. et al Butamax(TM) Advanced 1:12cv00602 Voluntary Dismissal 39.7 Biofuels LLC v. Gevo Inc. Trustco Bank v. Automated 1:12cv00613 Voluntary Dismissal 13.5 Transactions LLC Selene Communication 1:14cv00126 Voluntary Dismissal 10.0 Technologies LLC v. CISCO Systems Inc. Cot'N Wash Inc. et al v. 1:12cv00650 Voluntary Dismissal 27.7 Henkel Corporation et al Kenexa BrassRing Inc. v. 1:12cv00660 Voluntary Dismissal 20.8 Akken Inc. et al AbbVie Inc. et al v. Kremers 1:12cv00703 Voluntary Dismissal 16.0 Urban Pharmaceuticals Inc. Alcorn Communications LLC 1:12cv00774 Voluntary Dismissal 10.9 v. PulsePoint Inc. Pfizer Inc. et al v. Apotex 1:12cv00809 Voluntary Dismissal 25.1 Inc. et al 68 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Pfizer Inc. et al v. Apotex 1:12cv00808 Voluntary Dismissal 25.5 Inc. et al Pfizer Inc. et al v. 1:12cv00810 Voluntary Dismissal 24.1 Breckenridge Pharmaceutical Inc. et al Pfizer Inc. et al v. Lupin Ltd. 1:12cv00811 Voluntary Dismissal 25.0 et al Pfizer Inc. et al v. Mylan 1:12cv00812 Voluntary Dismissal 25.3 Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al Pfizer Inc. et al v. Roxane 1:12cv00813 Voluntary Dismissal 25.3 Laboratories Inc. Pfizer Inc. et al v. Sandoz 1:12cv00814 Voluntary Dismissal 25.2 Inc. Pfizer Inc. et al v. Watson 1:12cv00816 Voluntary Dismissal 25.4 Laboratories Inc. Florida et al Pfizer Inc. et al v. Wockhardt 1:12cv00817 Voluntary Dismissal 23.6 Ltd. et al Pfizer Inc. et al v. Zydus 1:12cv00818 Voluntary Dismissal 25.5 Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et al Blue Sunny Skies LLC et al 1:12cv00829 Voluntary Dismissal 3.8 v. PV Thermal Solar LLC et al Alkermes Pharma Ireland 1:12cv00834 Voluntary Dismissal 10.7 Limited v. Intellipharmaceutics Corporation et al Tessera Inc. v. Amkor 1:12cv00852 Voluntary Dismissal 30.5 Technology Inc. Mobile Logistics LLC v. 1:12cv00882 Voluntary Dismissal 2.3 Americold Logistics LLC Mobile Logistics LLC v. Cost 1:12cv00883 Voluntary Dismissal 5.3 Plus Inc. 69 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Mobile Logistics LLC v. 1:12cv00885 Voluntary Dismissal 14.3 FedEx Freight Inc. et al Mobile Logistics LLC V. 1:12cv00886 Voluntary Dismissal 5.9 Kimberly-Clark Corporation Mobile Logistics LLC v. Kraft 1:12cv00887 Voluntary Dismissal 6.4 Foods Global Inc. Mobile Logistics LLC v. 1:12cv00888 Voluntary Dismissal 2.3 Marten Transport Ltd. Mobile Logistics LLC V. 1:12cv00889 Voluntary Dismissal 5.8 Nestle USA Inc. Mobile Logistics LLC v. 1:12cv00891 Voluntary Dismissal 9.2 Supervalu Inc. Lennon Image Technologies 1:12cv00901 Voluntary Dismissal 5.6 LLC v. Mattel Inc. Lennon Image Technologies 1:12cv00902 Voluntary Dismissal 2.9 LLC v. Tissot USA Inc. et al Lennon Image Technologies 1:12cv00903 Voluntary Dismissal 12.0 LLC v. Skullcandy Inc. Lennon Image Technologies 1:12cv00904 Voluntary Dismissal 12.7 LLC v. Forevermark US Inc. Lennon Image Technologies 1:12cv00905 Voluntary Dismissal 9.7 LLC v. Conde Nast Publications Inc. et al Carrier Corporation v. 1:12cv00930 Voluntary Dismissal 55.9 Goodman Global Inc. et al Versata Software Inc. et al v. 1:12cv00931 Voluntary Dismissal 28.1 Callidus Software Inc. Alcon Pharmaceuticals Ltd 1:12cv00960 Voluntary Dismissal 16.5 et al v. Apotex Inc. et al Alcon Pharmaceuticals Ltd 1:12cv00973 Voluntary Dismissal 16.3 et al v. Lupin Ltd. et al Butamax (TM) Advanced 1:12cv00999 Voluntary Dismissal 5.9 Biofuels LLC et al v. Gevo Inc. 70 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Activision TV, Inc. v. Adflow 1:12cv01006 Voluntary Dismissal 17.9 Health Networks Inc. Activision TV, Inc. v. 1:12cv01009 Voluntary Dismissal 23.5 National CineMedia LLC Mobile Logistics LLC v. 1:12cv01012 Voluntary Dismissal 1.6 Arctic Express Inc. Butamax (TM) Advanced 1:12cv01014 Voluntary Dismissal 36.9 Biofuels LLC v. Gevo Inc. Butamax(TM) Advanced 1:12cv01036 Voluntary Dismissal 36.7 Biofuels LLC v. Gevo Inc. Rosebud LMS Inc. v. Adobe 1:12cv01141 Voluntary Dismissal 17.4 Systems Incorporated Internet Media Interactive 1:12cv01194 Voluntary Dismissal 3.4 Corporation v. Philadelphia Media Network LLC Butamax (TM) Advanced 1:12cv01200 Voluntary Dismissal 35.3 Biofuels LLC v. Gevo Inc. Butamax (TM) Advanced 1:12cv01201 Voluntary Dismissal 10.4 Biofuels LLC et al v. Gevo Inc. Gevo Inc. v. Butamax (TM) 1:12cv01202 Voluntary Dismissal 10.4 Advanced Biofuels LLC et al LED Tech Development LLC 1:12cv01259 Voluntary Dismissal 11.9 v. Coleman Company Inc. Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01265 Voluntary Dismissal 15.4 v. ATM Systems Corporation Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01266 Voluntary Dismissal 6.0 v. Ltd. et al Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01267 Voluntary Dismissal 6.0 v. Canon Inc. et al Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01268 Voluntary Dismissal 16.1 v. Cardtronics Inc. et al

Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01269 Voluntary Dismissal 15.4 71 v. Epson Corp. et al Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01270 Voluntary Dismissal 4.9 v. Holdings Inc. et al Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01272 Voluntary Dismissal 9.6 v. Lexmark International Inc. Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01276 Voluntary Dismissal 10.5 v. Payment Alliance International Inc. Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01277 Voluntary Dismissal 12.2 v. Ricoh Company Ltd. et al Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01280 Voluntary Dismissal 12.6 v. Toshiba Corporation et al T5 Labs (Delaware) LLC v. 1:12cv01281 Voluntary Dismissal 18.2 Gaikai Inc. Butamax (TM) Advanced 1:12cv01300 Voluntary Dismissal 34.9 Biofuels LLC v. Gevo Inc. LED Tech Development LLC 1:12cv01316 Voluntary Dismissal 9.7 v. Apple Inc. LED Tech Development LLC 1:12cv01325 Voluntary Dismissal 13.2 v. Samsung Electronics America Inc. et al Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01326 Voluntary Dismissal 5.8 v. Best Data Products Inc. et al Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01327 Voluntary Dismissal 15.4 v. Dell Inc. Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01328 Voluntary Dismissal 15.1 v. Hiro Inc. Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01331 Voluntary Dismissal 13.0 v. Multi-Tech Systems Inc. Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01332 Voluntary Dismissal 5.8 v. Socket Mobile Inc. Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01335 Voluntary Dismissal 15.3 v. TRENDnet Inc. 72 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01336 Voluntary Dismissal 5.2 v. US Robotics Corporation Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01337 Voluntary Dismissal 15.2 v. Zoom Technologies Inc., et al. Sprogis v. JVL Ventures LLC 1:12cv01352 Voluntary Dismissal 9.4 Nestle Health Science - 1:12cv01403 Voluntary Dismissal 11.1 Pamlab Inc. et al v. Acella Pharmaceuticals LLC AbbVie Inc. et al v. Watson 1:12cv01409 Voluntary Dismissal 10.1 Laboratories Inc. - Florida FastVDO LLC v. Paramount 1:12cv01427 Voluntary Dismissal 20.3 Pictures Corporation LED Tech Development LLC 1:12cv01443 Voluntary Dismissal 14.9 v. America Inc. et al ORG Structure Innovations 1:12cv01446 Voluntary Dismissal 12.3 LLC v. Beta Systems Software of North America Inc. ORG Structure Innovations 1:12cv01449 Voluntary Dismissal 8.1 LLC v. Jericho Systems Corporation Afluo LLC v. Adobe Systems 1:12cv01459 Voluntary Dismissal 32.2 Inc. et al ORG Structure Innovations 1:12cv01463 Voluntary Dismissal 5.1 LLC v. Axiomatics Inc. ORG Structure Innovations 1:12cv01464 Voluntary Dismissal 7.0 LLC v. Fischer International Identity LLC ORG Structure Innovations 1:12cv01465 Voluntary Dismissal 10.8 LLC v. Sailpoint Technologies Inc. ORG Structure Innovations 1:12cv01466 Voluntary Dismissal 7.3 LLC v. Tools4Ever Inc. 73 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Nexans Inc. et al v. Belden 1:12cv01491 Voluntary Dismissal 44.7 Inc. et al Aeritas LLC v. Virgin 1:12cv01492 Voluntary Dismissal 13.4 America Inc. Peschke Map Technologies 1:12cv01520 Voluntary Dismissal 15.4 LLC v. Bayer Properties LLC Peschke Map Technologies 1:12cv01521 Voluntary Dismissal 14.2 LLC v. Boulevard Invest LLC Peschke Map Technologies 1:12cv01522 Voluntary Dismissal 14.1 LLC v. CenterCal Properties LLC Peschke Map Technologies 1:12cv01523 Voluntary Dismissal 17.0 LLC v. General Growth Properties Inc. Peschke Map Technologies 1:12cv01524 Voluntary Dismissal 16.1 LLC v. Irvine Company LLC Peschke Map Technologies 1:12cv01525 Voluntary Dismissal 23.7 LLC v. JJ Gumberg Co. Peschke Map Technologies 1:12cv01528 Voluntary Dismissal 19.9 LLC v. Simon Property Group LP Peschke Map Technologies 1:12cv01527 Voluntary Dismissal 20.6 LLC v. Madison Marquette Retail Services Inc. et al Peschke Map Technologies 1:12cv01531 Voluntary Dismissal 14.3 LLC v. VF Outlet Inc Peschke Map Technologies 1:12cv01532 Voluntary Dismissal 17.0 LLC v. Westfield Concession Management LLC Peschke Map Technologies 1:12cv01571 Voluntary Dismissal 16.8 LLC v. Macerich Partnership LP Peschke Map Technologies 1:12cv01572 Voluntary Dismissal 21.4 LLC v. Short Hills Associates LLC et.al. 74 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Peschke Map Technologies 1:12cv01573 Voluntary Dismissal 10.4 LLC v. MOAC Mall Holdings LLC Peschke Map Technologies 1:12cv01574 Voluntary Dismissal 20.6 LLC v. Vornado Realty LP Cellectis S.A. v. Precision 1:12cv01662 Voluntary Dismissal 13.9 Biosciences Inc. et al OSI Pharmaceuticals LLC et 1:12cv01669 Voluntary Dismissal 9.3 al v. Roxane Laboratories Inc. Alkermes Pharma Ireland 1:12cv01673 Voluntary Dismissal 17.3 Limited v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. Merz Pharmaceuticals LLC 1:12cv01723 Voluntary Dismissal 10.9 v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc. et al Gevo, Inc. v. Butamax (TM) 1:12cv01724 Voluntary Dismissal 20.1 Advanced Biofuels LLC et al Gevo, Inc. v. Butamax (TM) 1:12cv01725 Voluntary Dismissal 1.3 Advanced Biofuels LLC et al Orientview Technologies 1:12cv01745 Voluntary Dismissal 9.4 LLC v. Spy Inc. AeroScout Ltd. et al v. 1:12cv01747 Voluntary Dismissal 12.8 Centrak Inc. Brandywine 1:12cv01767 Voluntary Dismissal 22.5 Communications Technologies LLC v. MegaPath Inc. Brandywine 1:12cv01769 Voluntary Dismissal 15.0 Communications Technologies LLC v. Windstream Corporation Brandywine 1:12cv01780 Voluntary Dismissal 12.4 Communications Technologies LLC v. Aastra 75 USA Inc. et al Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Brandywine 1:12cv01782 Voluntary Dismissal 14.9 Communications Technologies LLC v. Allworx Corporation Brandywine 1:12cv01784 Voluntary Dismissal 20.4 Communications Technologies LLC v. Consolidated Communications Holdings Inc. Brandywine 1:12cv01787 Voluntary Dismissal 9.6 Communications Technologies LLC v. Zultys Inc Preservation Technologies 1:13cv00032 Voluntary Dismissal 16.8 LLC v. CSC Holdings LLC Charter Communications 1:14cv00055 Voluntary Dismissal 12.5 Inc. et al v. Rockstar Consortium US LP et al Wireless Media Innovations 1:13cv01901 Voluntary Dismissal 6.1 LLC v. Sears Holding Corporation Cloud Satchel LLC v. Kobo 1:13cv01890 Voluntary Dismissal 5.3 Inc. Data Speed Technology LLC 1:13cv00615 Voluntary Dismissal 3.9 v. Cisco Systems Inc. Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. 1:14cv00250 Voluntary Dismissal 4.1 Creative Technology Ltd. et al Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. 1:14cv00249 Voluntary Dismissal 3.0 Braven LC Teijin Limited et al v. Apotex 1:13cv01851 Voluntary Dismissal 27.1 Inc. et al

76 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Estech Systems Inc. v. 1:13cv00067 Voluntary Dismissal 5.9 Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC Automated Transactions 1:13cv00134 Voluntary Dismissal 22.0 LLC v. Cumberland Farms, Inc. YYZ LLC v. Software AG 1:13cv00137 Voluntary Dismissal 20.4 Inc. et al Activision TV, Inc. v. Wawa 1:13cv00153 Voluntary Dismissal 9.9 Inc. Activelight Inc. v. Solohealth 1:13cv00167 Voluntary Dismissal 13.7 Inc. Precision Biosciences Inc. et 1:13cv00247 Voluntary Dismissal 11.4 al v. Cellectis S.A. et al Bosch Security Systems Inc. 1:13cv00296 Voluntary Dismissal 7.5 et al v. Criminal Activity Surveillance LLC Activision TV, Inc. v. 1:13cv00302 Voluntary Dismissal 12.5 Carmike Cinemas, Inc. Jack Henry & 1:13cv00423 Voluntary Dismissal 3.5 Associates Inc. v. Sonic Industry LLC HBAC MatchMaker Media 1:13cv00427 Voluntary Dismissal 9.2 Inc. v. AOL Inc. HBAC MatchMaker Media 1:13cv00431 Voluntary Dismissal 24.9 Inc. v. Fox Broadcasting Company et al HBAC MatchMaker Media 1:13cv00432 Voluntary Dismissal 33.0 Inc. v. DirecTV Group Inc HBAC MatchMaker Media 1:13cv00434 Voluntary Dismissal 22.2 Inc. v. CNN Interactive Group et al HBAC MatchMaker Media 1:13cv00435 Voluntary Dismissal 23.4 Inc. v. Univision Interactive 77 Media Inc. Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

FundsXpress Financial 1:13cv00468 Voluntary Dismissal 4.6 Network Inc. v. Sonic Industry LLC Intellectual Ventures I LLC et 1:13cv00473 Voluntary Dismissal 33.4 al v. Canon Inc. et al. Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. 1:13cv00474 Voluntary Dismissal 45.7 Ricoh Americas Corporation et al Automated Transactions 1:13cv00502 Voluntary Dismissal 21.4 LLC v. Southbridge Savings Bank et al Automated Transactions 1:13cv00503 Voluntary Dismissal 21.4 LLC v. Mascoma Savings Bank Automated Transactions 1:13cv00504 Voluntary Dismissal 19.1 LLC v. Northfield Savings Bank Automated Transactions 1:13cv00505 Voluntary Dismissal 21.4 LLC v. New England Federal Credit Union Automated Transactions 1:13cv00506 Voluntary Dismissal 21.5 LLC v. Heritage Family Credit Union Wireless Media Innovations 1:13cv00536 Voluntary Dismissal 7.8 LLC v Americold Logistics LLC Vehicle Operation 1:13cv00537 Voluntary Dismissal 18.8 Technologies LLC v. American Honda Motor Co. Inc. Automated Transactions 1:13cv00582 Voluntary Dismissal 21.0 LLC v. Bath Savings Institution Automated Transactions 1:13cv00583 Voluntary Dismissal 21.1 LLC v. Winchester 78 Co-Operative Bank Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

YYZ LLC v. BMC Software 1:13cv00580 Voluntary Dismissal 11.5 Inc. Automated Transactions 1:13cv00584 Voluntary Dismissal 21.1 LLC v. Adams Community Bank Automated Transactions 1:13cv00587 Voluntary Dismissal 4.0 LLC v. Llewellyn-Edison Savings Bank Automated Transactions 1:13cv00588 Voluntary Dismissal 4.0 LLC v. Community Bank of Bergen County Automated Transactions 1:13cv00591 Voluntary Dismissal 5.6 LLC v. New York Community Bank Automated Transactions 1:13cv00592 Voluntary Dismissal 2.3 LLC v. Stewart's Shops, Corp. Automated Transactions 1:13cv00593 Voluntary Dismissal 2.6 LLC v. Trustco Bank Automated Transactions 1:13cv00594 Voluntary Dismissal 21.0 LLC v. Dannemora Federal Credit Union Automated Transactions 1:13cv00595 Voluntary Dismissal 5.2 LLC v. Astoria Financial Corporation et al Automated Transactions 1:13cv00596 Voluntary Dismissal 19.4 LLC v. Sunoco, Inc. et al. Data Speed Technology LLC 1:13cv00616 Voluntary Dismissal 20.3 v. EMC Corporation Data Speed Technology LLC 1:13cv00617 Voluntary Dismissal 3.7 v. Hewlett-Packard Company Data Speed Technology LLC 1:13cv00618 Voluntary Dismissal 3.8 v. International Business Machines Corporation 79 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Data Speed Technology LLC 1:13cv00619 Voluntary Dismissal 23.2 v. LexisNexis Group Data Speed Technology LLC 1:13cv00620 Voluntary Dismissal 4.1 v. Microsoft Corporation Data Speed Technology LLC 1:13cv00621 Voluntary Dismissal 3.9 v. Novell Inc. Data Speed Technology LLC 1:13cv00622 Voluntary Dismissal 3.9 v. Oracle Corporation Data Speed Technology LLC 1:13cv00623 Voluntary Dismissal 18.4 v. World Software Corporation Data Speed Technology LLC 1:13cv00624 Voluntary Dismissal 21.7 v. Xerox Corporation Data Speed Technology LLC 1:13cv00625 Voluntary Dismissal 17.2 v. Zoho Corporation Data Speed Technology LLC 1:13cv00689 Voluntary Dismissal 11.3 v. Open Text Inc. Data Speed Technology LLC 1:13cv00690 Voluntary Dismissal 3.5 v. SAP America Inc. Precision Biosciences Inc. et 1:13cv00708 Voluntary Dismissal 9.4 al v. Lonza Group Ltd. et al SRI International Inc. v. Dell 1:13cv00737 Voluntary Dismissal 28.3 Inc. et al In re: Automated 1:13md02429 Voluntary Dismissal 23.2 Transactions LLC - Patent Litigation Teijin Limited et al v. 1:14cv00117 Voluntary Dismissal 17.4 Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited et al Arris Group Inc. et al v. 1:14cv00114 Voluntary Dismissal 12.1 Constellation Technologies LLC et al IGT v. WMS Gaming Inc. 1:14cv00098 Voluntary Dismissal 4.8

Data Speed Technology LLC 1:14cv00037 Voluntary Dismissal 17.1 80 v. Saba Software Inc. Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Data Speed Technology LLC 1:14cv00036 Voluntary Dismissal 13.1 v. Perforce Software Inc. Data Speed Technology LLC 1:14cv00034 Voluntary Dismissal 5.3 v. Intuit Inc. Data Speed Technology LLC 1:14cv00033 Voluntary Dismissal 10.2 v. Egnyte Inc. Data Speed Technology LLC 1:14cv00032 Voluntary Dismissal 12.7 v. Autodesk Inc. Alcon Research Ltd. v. Micro 1:14cv00014 Voluntary Dismissal 15.5 Labs Limited et al MPHJ Technology 1:14cv00006 Voluntary Dismissal 38.6 Investments LLC v. Unum Group Takeda Pharmaceuticals 1:14cv00268 Voluntary Dismissal 24.0 USA Inc. v. Watson Laboratories Inc. et al Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. 1:14cv00255 Voluntary Dismissal 6.8 Monoprice Inc. Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. 1:14cv00253 Voluntary Dismissal 8.7 Harman International Industries Inc. Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. GN 1:14cv00252 Voluntary Dismissal 2.9 Netcom Inc. Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. 1:14cv00248 Voluntary Dismissal 10.0 Boston Acoustics Inc. MPHJ Technology 1:14cv00003 Voluntary Dismissal 38.8 Investments LLC v. Coca-Cola Company Teijin Limited et al v. Zydus 1:13cv02086 Voluntary Dismissal 26.3 Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et al Internet Media Interactive 1:13cv02084 Voluntary Dismissal 2.4 Corporation v. Gillette Company 81 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

ORG Structure Innovations 1:13cv02053 Voluntary Dismissal 10.8 LLC v. AlertEnterprise Inc. Alcon Research Ltd. v. 1:13cv02040 Voluntary Dismissal 10.6 Wockhardt Limited et al Bockstar Technologies LLC 1:13cv02020 Voluntary Dismissal 15.6 v. Cisco Systems Inc. Courtesy Products LLC v. 1:13cv02012 Voluntary Dismissal 37.9 Hamilton Beach Inc. Jernberg Dental LLC v. 1:13cv01980 Voluntary Dismissal 4.7 Integra Lifesciences Holdings Corporation et al Pfizer Inc. et al v. Fresenius 1:13cv01893 Voluntary Dismissal 24.3 Kabi USA LLC WAND Corporation v. 1:13cv01892 Voluntary Dismissal 9.8 Activision TV Inc. Teijin Limited et al v. Sun 1:13cv01852 Voluntary Dismissal 19.7 Pharma Global FZE et al Teijin Limited et al. v. Mylan 1:13cv01781 Voluntary Dismissal 32.2 Pharmaceuticals Inc. Teijin Limited et al. v. Dr. 1:13cv01780 Voluntary Dismissal 27.4 Reddy's Laboratories Ltd., et al. Activision TV Inc. v. Arby's 1:13cv01759 Voluntary Dismissal 6.6 Restaurant Group Inc. Activision TV Inc. v. Wendy's 1:13cv01758 Voluntary Dismissal 9.1 International Inc. Activision TV Inc. v. 1:13cv01757 Voluntary Dismissal 8.8 Smashburger Master LLC Forest Laboratories Inc. et al 1:13cv01737 Voluntary Dismissal 26.7 v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC et al Takeda Pharmaceuticals 1:13cv01729 Voluntary Dismissal 30.4 USA Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC 82 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Forest Laboratories Inc. et al 1:13cv01604 Voluntary Dismissal 31.6 v. Lupin Limited et al Forest Laboratories Inc. et al 1:13cv01603 Voluntary Dismissal 26.7 v. Hetero USA Inc. et al Activision TV Inc. v. Dunkin 1:13cv01597 Voluntary Dismissal 19.4 Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC Device Security LLC v. 1:13cv01478 Voluntary Dismissal 13.3 Asurion LLC Senju Pharmaceutical Co. 1:13cv00851 Voluntary Dismissal 23.3 Ltd. et al v. Strides Inc. et al Mobile Logistics LLC V 1:13cv00905 Voluntary Dismissal 4.4 Omni-ID Ltd. HBAC MatchMaker Media 1:13cv00963 Voluntary Dismissal 9.7 Inc. v. News Distribution Network Inc. HBAC MatchMaker Media 1:13cv00964 Voluntary Dismissal 4.3 Inc. v. NextPoint Inc. et al HBAC MatchMaker Media 1:13cv00965 Voluntary Dismissal 13.8 Inc. v. Ustream Inc. Pfizer Inc. et al v. Dr. 1:13cv00989 Voluntary Dismissal 18.0 Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd. et al Data Speed Technology LLC 1:13cv01049 Voluntary Dismissal 1.7 v. Adobe Systems Incorporated Data Speed Technology LLC 1:13cv01052 Voluntary Dismissal 18.9 v Toshiba America Inc. Activision TV Inc. v. 1:13cv01087 Voluntary Dismissal 9.7 Build-A-Bear Workshop Inc. Ruckus Wireless Inc. v. 1:13cv01099 Voluntary Dismissal 7.8 Netgear Inc. Par Pharmaceutical Inc. et al 1:13cv01114 Voluntary Dismissal 31.1 v Breckenridge Pharmaceutical Inc. 83 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

ImmerVision Inc. v. CBC Co. 1:13cv01139 Voluntary Dismissal 13.3 Ltd. et al Alpex Pharma S A et al v. 1:13cv01143 Voluntary Dismissal 16.9 Zydus Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et al Brandywine 1:13cv01192 Voluntary Dismissal 6.0 Communications Technologies LLC v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. Brandywine 1:13cv01193 Voluntary Dismissal 6.0 Communications Technologies LLC v. Aastra USA Inc. Brandywine 1:13cv01194 Voluntary Dismissal 8.6 Communications Technologies LLC v. Allworx Corporation Brandywine 1:13cv01195 Voluntary Dismissal 3.3 Communications Technologies LLC v. Zultys Inc. Alcon Pharmaceuticals Ltd 1:13cv01230 Voluntary Dismissal 8.0 et al v. Lupin Ltd. et al Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:13cv01256 Voluntary Dismissal 2.8 v. Ricoh Company Ltd. et al Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:13cv01257 Voluntary Dismissal 7.8 v. StarTech.com Ltd. et al Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:13cv01258 Voluntary Dismissal 3.0 v. Toshiba Corporation et al Intellectual Ventures I LLC et 1:13cv01274 Voluntary Dismissal 25.3 al v. Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company Aeritas LLC v. American 1:13cv01320 Voluntary Dismissal 14.0 Airlines Inc. 84 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Alcon Research Ltd. v. 1:13cv01332 Voluntary Dismissal 20.1 Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al Eclipse IP LLC v CDW 1:13cv01365 Voluntary Dismissal 7.6 Corporation Eclipse IP LLC v. Golf 1:13cv01368 Voluntary Dismissal 6.7 Warehouse Inc. Eclipse IP LLC v. L.L. Bean 1:13cv01369 Voluntary Dismissal 8.3 Inc. Eclipse IP LLC v. PetMed 1:13cv01372 Voluntary Dismissal 5.8 Express Inc. Cloud Satchel LLC v. Sony 1:13cv01381 Voluntary Dismissal 11.4 Electronics Inc. et al Activision TV Inc. v. Omni 1:13cv01395 Voluntary Dismissal 9.0 Hotels Management Corporation Data Speed Technology LLC 1:13cv01443 Voluntary Dismissal 9.0 v. Alfresco Software Ltd et al Data Speed Technology LLC 1:13cv01444 Voluntary Dismissal 7.2 v. Box Inc. Data Speed Technology LLC 1:13cv01445 Voluntary Dismissal 4.9 v. Blackboard Inc. Data Speed Technology LLC 1:13cv01447 Voluntary Dismissal 10.3 v. Dassault Systemes SolidWorks Corp. Data Speed Technology LLC 1:13cv01450 Voluntary Dismissal 15.1 v. Thomson Reuters Corporation et al Data Speed Technology LLC 1:13cv01451 Voluntary Dismissal 18.7 v. VMware Inc. Data Speed Technology LLC 1:13cv01452 Voluntary Dismissal 18.7 v. Wolters Kluwer U.S. Corporation et al Activision TV Inc. v. CDL 1:13cv01473 Voluntary Dismissal 8.5 West 45th Street LLC 85 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Activelight Inc. v. KAH 20 1:13cv01474 Voluntary Dismissal 8.5 2nd Avenue LLC Activision TV Inc. v. MGM 1:13cv01523 Voluntary Dismissal 11.5 Resorts International Takeda Pharmaceuticals 1:13cv01524 Voluntary Dismissal 28.4 USA Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical Companies Inc. et al Wireless Media Innovations 1:13cv01545 Voluntary Dismissal 8.5 LLC v. Leapfrog Enterprises Inc. Forest Laboratories Inc. et al 1:13cv01607 Voluntary Dismissal 14.8 v Ranbaxy Inc. et al Pfizer Inc. et al v. Apotex 1:13cv01613 Voluntary Dismissal 17.0 Inc. et al Forest Laboratories Inc. et al 1:13cv01642 Voluntary Dismissal 7.4 v. First Time US Generics LLC Preservation Technologies 1:13cv01689 Voluntary Dismissal 2.0 LLC v. CBS Interactive Inc. Preservation Technologies 1:13cv01690 Voluntary Dismissal 13.5 LLC v. Fox Broadcasting Company Preservation Technologies 1:13cv01691 Voluntary Dismissal 13.2 LLC v. New York Times Digital LLC Forest Laboratories Inc. et al 1:14cv00159 Voluntary Dismissal 22.4 v. Glenmark Generics Inc. USA et al Fresenius Kabi USA LLC v. 1:14cv00160 Voluntary Dismissal 12.8 Dr Reddy's Laboratories Ltd et al. Fresenius Kabi USA LLC v. 1:14cv00161 Voluntary Dismissal 13.3 Watson Laboratories Inc. et al. 86 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Teijin Limited et al v. Hetero 1:14cv00166 Voluntary Dismissal 13.3 USA Inc. et al Teijin Limited et al v. Lupin 1:14cv00184 Voluntary Dismissal 24.3 Limited et al Teijin Limited et al v. Roxane 1:14cv00189 Voluntary Dismissal 27.1 Laboratories Inc. Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. 1:14cv00190 Voluntary Dismissal 7.9 Beats Electronics LLC Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. 1:14cv00191 Voluntary Dismissal 3.6 JWIN Electronics Corp. Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. SDI 1:14cv00192 Voluntary Dismissal 5.2 Technologies Inc. Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. 1:14cv00193 Voluntary Dismissal 9.0 of America Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. 1:14cv00195 Voluntary Dismissal 8.3 Parrot SA, et al. Antares Pharma Inc. v. 1:14cv00270 Voluntary Dismissal 13.6 Medac Pharma Inc. et al Automated Transactions 1:14cv00280 Voluntary Dismissal 12.2 LLC v. Speedy Cash Automated Transactions 1:14cv00281 Voluntary Dismissal 12.2 LLC v. Goathead Saloon-AAA ATMS Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. 1:14cv00285 Voluntary Dismissal 10.4 Imation Corporation Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. 1:14cv00286 Voluntary Dismissal 9.9 Klipsch Group Inc. Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. 1:14cv00287 Voluntary Dismissal 6.7 Spectra Merchandising International Inc. Selene Communication 1:14cv00340 Voluntary Dismissal 7.1 Technologies LLC v. Dell Inc. 87 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Selene Communication 1:14cv00341 Voluntary Dismissal 12.8 Technologies LLC v. EMC Corporation Interface IP Holdings LLC v. 1:14cv00370 Voluntary Dismissal 4.5 Open Text Corporation Amount Inc. v. Amazon.com 1:14cv00390 Voluntary Dismissal 10.8 Inc. Spherix Incorporated v. 1:14cv00393 Voluntary Dismissal 20.2 Cisco Systems Inc. Selene Communication 1:14cv00403 Voluntary Dismissal 6.8 Technologies LLC v. Oracle Corporation Selene Communication 1:14cv00404 Voluntary Dismissal 16.8 Technologies LLC v. Reed Elsevier Group plc et al Intercap Capital Partners 1:14cv00417 Voluntary Dismissal 6.1 LLC v. BuildingIQ Inc. GPNE Corp. v. BP America 1:14cv00419 Voluntary Dismissal 2.2 Inc. Joao Bock Transaction 1:14cv00425 Voluntary Dismissal 24.8 Systems LLC v. Capital One Financial Corporation et al Selene Communication 1:14cv00434 Voluntary Dismissal 7.4 Technologies LLC v. Monster Worldwide Inc. Selene Communication 1:14cv00447 Voluntary Dismissal 13.9 Technologies LLC v. Thomson Reuters Corporation et al Selene Communication 1:14cv00462 Voluntary Dismissal 6.0 Technologies LLC v. Linkedin Corporation Automated Transactions 1:14cv00506 Voluntary Dismissal 9.0 LLC v. M&T Bank Corporation 88 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Certainteed Corporation v. 1:14cv00510 Voluntary Dismissal 24.9 Owens Corning Joao Bock Transaction 1:14cv00529 Voluntary Dismissal 24.1 Systems LLC v. General Electric Capital Corporation Joao Bock Transaction 1:14cv00530 Voluntary Dismissal 24.1 Systems LLC v. TradeKing Group, Inc. Selene Communication 1:14cv00534 Voluntary Dismissal 6.5 Technologies LLC v. Google Inc. Selene Communication 1:14cv00535 Voluntary Dismissal 5.8 Technologies LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Company SportBrain Holdings Inc. v. 1:14cv00553 Voluntary Dismissal 10.7 Polar Electro Inc. USA SportBrain Holdings Inc. v. 1:14cv00554 Voluntary Dismissal 10.7 Withings Inc. CryoLife Inc. v. Medafor Inc. 1:14cv00559 Voluntary Dismissal 18.7 Proximity Monitoring 1:14cv00577 Voluntary Dismissal 9.0 Innovations LLC v Voxx Electronics Corp. et al Spherix Incorporated et al. v. 1:14cv00578 Voluntary Dismissal 19.1 Juniper Networks Inc. Open Network Solutions Inc. 1:14cv00618 Voluntary Dismissal 8.9 v. Amazon Inc. Open Network Solutions Inc. 1:14cv00619 Voluntary Dismissal 5.7 v. Canon Inc. et al Alcon Research Ltd. v. 1:14cv00647 Voluntary Dismissal 7.8 Watson Laboratories Inc. Open Network Solutions Inc. 1:14cv00652 Voluntary Dismissal 3.3 v. Cavium Inc. Open Network Solutions Inc. 1:14cv00676 Voluntary Dismissal 5.9 v. DirecTV, et al. 89 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Open Network Solutions Inc. 1:14cv00702 Voluntary Dismissal 8.3 v. Yamaha Corporation of America Open Network Solutions Inc. 1:14cv00703 Voluntary Dismissal 8.5 v. Diebold Incorporated Open Network Solutions Inc. 1:14cv00704 Voluntary Dismissal 14.9 v. NCR Corporation Open Network Solutions Inc. 1:14cv00729 Voluntary Dismissal 8.0 v. Brother Industries Ltd. et al Pfizer Inc. et al v. CFT 1:14cv00781 Voluntary Dismissal 14.8 Pharmaceuticals LLC Open Network Solutions Inc. 1:14cv00782 Voluntary Dismissal 15.2 v. Xerox Corporation Open Network Solutions Inc. 1:14cv00787 Voluntary Dismissal 14.4 v. Lexmark International Inc. Teijin Limited et al v. 1:14cv00854 Voluntary Dismissal 16.4 Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc. Sequent Data LLC v. Asus 1:14cv00855 Voluntary Dismissal 9.9 Computer International Sequent Data LLC v. Buffalo 1:14cv00856 Voluntary Dismissal 8.6 Americas Inc. et al. Sequent Data LLC v. 1:14cv00858 Voluntary Dismissal 7.6 Memorex Products Inc. et al Sequent Data LLC v. 1:14cv00859 Voluntary Dismissal 8.2 Corporation of North America et al Sequent Data LLC v. 1:14cv00860 Voluntary Dismissal 13.1 Pioneer Electronics (USA) Inc., et al. Sequent Data LLC v. Plextor 1:14cv00861 Voluntary Dismissal 5.6 LLC, et al. Sequent Data LLC v. Sony 1:14cv00862 Voluntary Dismissal 8.6 Optiarc America Inc., et al. 90 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Pixion Inc. v. Blackboard 1:14cv00865 Voluntary Dismissal 6.4 Inc. Pfizer Inc. et al v. Aurobindo 1:14cv00872 Voluntary Dismissal 14.7 Pharma Ltd. et al Network Congestion 1:14cv00894 Voluntary Dismissal 15.8 Solutions LLC v. AT&T Inc., et al. Network Congestion 1:14cv00895 Voluntary Dismissal 15.8 Solutions LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC Network Congestion 1:14cv00896 Voluntary Dismissal 18.1 Solutions LLC v. Atlantic Broadband Group LLC Network Congestion 1:14cv00897 Voluntary Dismissal 18.1 Solutions LLC v. Cable One Inc. Network Congestion 1:14cv00898 Voluntary Dismissal 14.6 Solutions LLC v. CSC Holdings LLC Network Congestion 1:14cv00899 Voluntary Dismissal 15.4 Solutions LLC v. CenturyLink Communications LLC Network Congestion 1:14cv00901 Voluntary Dismissal 16.0 Solutions LLC v. Sprint Corporation Network Congestion 1:14cv00902 Voluntary Dismissal 15.4 Solutions LLC v. T-Mobile US Inc. Network Congestion 1:14cv00903 Voluntary Dismissal 20.9 Solutions LLC v. United States Cellular Corporation Network Congestion 1:14cv00904 Voluntary Dismissal 21.9 Solutions LLC v. WideOpenWest Finance 91 LLC Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Duchesnay Inc. et al v. 1:14cv00912 Voluntary Dismissal 24.2 Actavis Inc. et al Senju Pharmaceutical Co. 1:14cv00923 Voluntary Dismissal 9.3 Ltd. et al v. Actavis Inc. et al Pixion Inc. v. Saba Software 1:14cv00953 Voluntary Dismissal 10.1 Inc. Kowa Company Ltd et al v. 1:14cv00978 Voluntary Dismissal 6.9 Sawai USA Inc. et al Daravita Limited v. Sun 1:14cv00986 Voluntary Dismissal 4.9 Pharma Global FZE et al Pixion Inc. v. FuzeBox 1:14cv00992 Voluntary Dismissal 3.5 Software Corporation Pixion Inc. v. BigBlueButton 1:14cv00993 Voluntary Dismissal 17.5 Inc. et al. Pixion Inc. v. Start Meeting 1:14cv00994 Voluntary Dismissal 6.0 LLC Pfizer Inc. et al v. 1:14cv01028 Voluntary Dismissal 5.9 Intellipharmaceutics International Inc. et al Corning Inc. v. DSM 1:14cv01081 Voluntary Dismissal 16.5 Desotech Inc. et al Collabo Innovations Inc. v. 1:14cv01093 Voluntary Dismissal 13.9 Aptina (U.S.) Inc. et al Senju Pharmaceutical Co. 1:14cv01105 Voluntary Dismissal 7.9 Ltd. et al v. Micro Labs Limited et al Purdue Pharma L.P. v. 1:14cv01227 Voluntary Dismissal 24.6 Watson Laboratories Inc. Kowa Company Ltd. et al v. 1:14cv01264 Voluntary Dismissal 4.6 Apotex Inc. et al Preservation Technologies 1:14cv01293 Voluntary Dismissal 6.8 LLC vs. Viacom, Inc. Preservation Technologies 1:14cv01294 Voluntary Dismissal 14.6 LLC vs. MLB Advanced 92 Media L.P. Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Preservation Technologies 1:14cv01295 Voluntary Dismissal 17.9 LLC vs. NFL Enterprises LLC Preservation Technologies 1:14cv01296 Voluntary Dismissal 10.1 LLC v Vevo LLC Preservation Technologies 1:14cv01297 Voluntary Dismissal 14.6 LLC v World Wrestling Entertainment Inc. Scientific 1:14cv01337 Voluntary Dismissal 6.2 Telecommunications LLC v. Brocade Communications Systems Inc. Teijin Limited et al v. 1:14cv01370 Voluntary Dismissal 14.0 Unimark Remedies Ltd. Purdue Pharma L.P. v. 1:14cv01410 Voluntary Dismissal 22.9 Watson Laboratories Inc. Round Rock Research LLC 1:14cv01457 Voluntary Dismissal 13.1 v. Canon Inc. et al Round Rock Research LLC 1:14cv01458 Voluntary Dismissal 13.1 v. JVC Kenwood Corp. et al Scientific 1:14cv01462 Voluntary Dismissal 4.8 Telecommunications LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. Round Rock Research LLC 1:14cv01491 Voluntary Dismissal 15.4 v. Co. Ltd. et al Vite Technologies LLC v. 1:14cv01506 Voluntary Dismissal 26.5 Arthrex Inc. Vite Technologies LLC v. 1:14cv01507 Voluntary Dismissal 26.5 Smith & Nephew Inc. iCeutica Pty Ltd. et al v. 1:14cv01515 Voluntary Dismissal 25.6 Lupin Limited et al Pfizer Inc et al v. Mylan 1:15cv00026 Voluntary Dismissal 23.2 Laboratories Limited Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. 1:15cv00085 Voluntary Dismissal 5.1 Koss Corporation 93 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Media Bridge LLC v. Clear 1:15cv00122 Voluntary Dismissal 11.1 Channel Outdoor Holdings Inc. et al. Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. 1:15cv00143 Voluntary Dismissal 3.3 Plantronics Inc. Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. 1:15cv00144 Voluntary Dismissal 5.3 Polk Audio LLC et al Round Rock Research LLC 1:15cv00157 Voluntary Dismissal 16.5 v. Ricoh Americas Corporation et al Purdue Pharma L.P. v. 1:15cv00192 Voluntary Dismissal 19.5 Actavis Laboratories UT Inc. Draeger Medical Systems 1:15cv00248 Voluntary Dismissal 13.1 Inc. v. My Health Inc. DNA Genotek Inc. v. 1:15cv00355 Voluntary Dismissal 21.0 Ancestry.com DNA LLC Duchesnay Inc. et al v. 1:15cv00385 Voluntary Dismissal 14.1 Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. Blackbird Tech LLC v. 1:15cv00398 Voluntary Dismissal 4.5 Roadmaster, Inc. Intellectual Ventures II LLC 1:15cv00446 Voluntary Dismissal 7.2 v. Canon Inc. and Canon U.S.A., Inc. Intellectual Ventures II LLC 1:15cv00447 Voluntary Dismissal 7.2 v. Canon Inc. and Canon U.S.A., Inc. Teijin Limited et al v. 1:15cv00454 Voluntary Dismissal 8.7 Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al Alcon Research Ltd. v. 1:15cv00479 Voluntary Dismissal 1.8 Akorn Inc. Par Pharmaceutical Inc. et al 1:15cv00486 Voluntary Dismissal 7.5 v. Breckenridge Pharmaceutical Inc. et al 94 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. 1:15cv00559 Voluntary Dismissal 5.2 Spherix Incorporated R-T ech Ueno, Ltd. v. Apotex, 1:15cv00592 Voluntary Dismissal 10.2 Inc. et al Alcon Research Ltd. v. Lupin 1:15cv00621 Voluntary Dismissal 3.1 Ltd. et al Scientific 1:15cv00647 Voluntary Dismissal 21.2 Telecommunications LLC v. Adtran Inc. Allergan, Inc. v. 1:15cv00815 Voluntary Dismissal 1.6 InnoPharma, Inc. et al Spherix Incorporated v. 1:15cv00869 Voluntary Dismissal 2.3 Verizon Services Corp. et al Litera Technologies LLC v. 1:15cv00923 Voluntary Dismissal 17.0 DocsCorp LLC Alcon Pharmaceuticals Ltd. 1:15cv00948 Voluntary Dismissal 0.8 et al v. Akorn, Inc. Novanta Corporation v. 1:15cv01033 Voluntary Dismissal 16.4 Iradion Laser, Inc. Par Pharmaceutical Inc. et al 1:15cv01039 Voluntary Dismissal 2.5 v. Breckenridge Pharmaceutical Inc. Cephalon, Inc. et al v. 1:15cv01074 Voluntary Dismissal 9.1 Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC Segway Inc. et al v. Razor 1:15cv01197 Voluntary Dismissal 15.9 USA LLC Duchesnay Inc. et al v. 1:16cv00123 Voluntary Dismissal 4.5 Apotex Inc. et al Upsher-Smith Laboratories 1:16cv00248 Voluntary Dismissal 9.3 Inc. v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. et al Sound View Innovations, 1:16cv00497 Voluntary Dismissal 6.9 LLC v. LinkedIn Corp. 95 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Sound View Innovations LLC 1:16cv00652 Voluntary Dismissal 5.7 v. Twitter Inc. NM, LLC et al v. Quikrete 1:16cv00814 Voluntary Dismissal 3.4 Companies, LLC Aptalis Pharma Canada 1:16cv01069 Voluntary Dismissal 5.0 ULC et al v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. Fit4D, Inc. v. My Health, Inc. 1:16cv01076 Voluntary Dismissal 4.8 Henkel Corporation v. 1:00cv00576 Voluntary Dismissal 13.1 Oakite Products Inc. Edwards Lifesciences, et al 1:01cv00142 Voluntary Dismissal 8.9 v. Medtronic Inc. Mallinckrodt Inc., et al v. 1:01cv00219 Voluntary Dismissal 4.2 Maxtec Inc., et al Syngenta Crop v. Bayer AG 1:01cv00317 Voluntary Dismissal 3.3 Aventis Pharma Prod., et al 1:01cv00451 Voluntary Dismissal 9.4 v. Introgen Thera Inc. Armstrong World, et al v. 1:02cv00270 Voluntary Dismissal 2.1 Mannington Mills Inc TA Instruments, Inc., et al v. 1:02cv00313 Voluntary Dismissal 5.6 Perkinelmer Inc. Digimarc Corporation v. 1:02cv01573 Voluntary Dismissal 6.4 Spectra Systems Atofina v. Great Lakes 1:03cv00347 Voluntary Dismissal 2.2 Chemical Campbell Mfg v. American 1:03cv01048 Voluntary Dismissal 8.5 Granby Inc. UD Technology Corp. v. 1:04cv00025 Voluntary Dismissal 0.7 Global Solar Energy, et al Cooper Cameron Corp. v. 1:04cv00054 Voluntary Dismissal 2.5 FMC Technologies Advanced Video v. Cirrus 1:04cv00194 Voluntary Dismissal 2.8 Logic, Inc. Cooper Cameron 1:05cv00188 Voluntary Dismissal 11.0 96 Corporation v. Dril-Quip, Inc. Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Novo Nordisk A/S v. 1:05cv00645 Voluntary Dismissal 25.9 Sanofi-Aventis et al Stabler Companies Inc. et al 1:05cv00681 Voluntary Dismissal 3.7 v. Scientex Corporation Tokai Kogyo Kabushiki 1:05cv00727 Voluntary Dismissal 12.9 Kaisha v. Volkswagen of America Inc. et al Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. 1:05cv00755 Voluntary Dismissal 4.0 YDI Wireless Inc. et al Padcom Inc. v. Netmotion 1:05cv00889 Voluntary Dismissal 0.8 Wireless Inc. Secure Elements Inc. v. 1:06cv00098 Voluntary Dismissal 31.1 Citadel Security Software Inc. Avago Technologies General 1:06cv00115 Voluntary Dismissal 0.3 IP Pte Ltd et al v. Finisar Corporation Syngenta Seeds Inc. et al v. 1:06cv00622 Voluntary Dismissal 1.1 DeKalb Genetics Corporation Interlink Electronics Inc. v. 1:06cv00732 Voluntary Dismissal 3.1 Nintendo of America Celgene Corporation et al v. 1:06cv00741 Voluntary Dismissal 7.4 Abrika Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al Parker-Hannifin Corporation 1:06cv00752 Voluntary Dismissal 2.5 v. Tennrich International Corporation Parker-Hannifin Corporation 1:06cv00754 Voluntary Dismissal 13.3 v. Shieldex Trading Gmbh Syngenta Biotechnology, 1:07cv00038 Voluntary Dismissal 9.1 Inc. et al v. DeKalb Genetics Corporation et al Optium Corporation v. 1:07cv00150 Voluntary Dismissal 9.7 Emcore Corporation et al 97 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Samsung Electronics Co. 1:07cv00251 Voluntary Dismissal 11.9 Ltd. v. Renesas Technology Corp. et al Girafa.com Inc. v. Amazon 1:07cv00787 Voluntary Dismissal 33.1 Web Services LLC et al Janssen L P et al v. KV 1:07cv00825 Voluntary Dismissal 1.9 Pharmaceutical Company Fifth Market Inc. v. CME 1:07cv00840 Voluntary Dismissal 5.3 Group Inc. et al Miller v. Durney et al 1:08cv00068 Voluntary Dismissal 2.3 Edgecraft Corporation v. 1:08cv00267 Voluntary Dismissal 3.7 Luckyman Enterprise Co. Ltd. Streamlight, Inc. v. 1:17cv00037 Voluntary Dismissal 2.1 Sportsmans Guide, Inc. Channel Intelligence Inc. v. 1:08cv00437 Voluntary Dismissal 4.0 SBSH Mobile Software Ltd. et al Channel Intelligence Inc. v. 1:08cv00438 Voluntary Dismissal 4.0 Lemonade Inc. et al Janssen Pharmaceutica N V 1:08cv00511 Voluntary Dismissal 4.8 et al v. Sandoz Inc. DVDPlay Inc. v. Redbox 1:08cv00803 Voluntary Dismissal 3.9 Automated Retail LLC Pylon Manufacturing Corp v. 1:09cv00063 Voluntary Dismissal 1.9 Jamak Fabrication-Tex LLC Picsel (Research) Ltd. et al 1:09cv00100 Voluntary Dismissal 5.0 v. Apple Inc. Mr. Bar-B-Q- Inc. v. Belk Inc. 1:09cv00259 Voluntary Dismissal 1.1 Tandberg Inc. v. Multimedia 1:09cv00456 Voluntary Dismissal 9.2 Patent Trust Verizon Communications 1:10cv00216 Voluntary Dismissal 28.9 Inc. et al v. Cablevision Systems Corp. 98 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Bayer Schering Pharma AG 1:10cv00474 Voluntary Dismissal 0.9 et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited et al Industries Ltd v. 1:10cv00535 Voluntary Dismissal 1.2 Arkema SA et al KV Pharmaceutical 1:10cv00641 Voluntary Dismissal 4.6 Company et al v. Perrigo Israel Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al Lupin Atlantis Holdings SA v. 1:10cv00659 Voluntary Dismissal 2.1 Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited et al Novartis Pharmaceuticals 1:10cv00916 Voluntary Dismissal 10.4 Corporation et al v. Apotex Corp. et al Everglades Interactive LLC 1:10cv01052 Voluntary Dismissal 9.6 v. Winster Inc. et al AU Optronics Corporation et 1:11cv00180 Voluntary Dismissal 1.8 al v. Sharp Corporation et al Walker Digital LLC v. 1:11cv00434 Voluntary Dismissal 1.1 Facebook Inc. et al Seiko Epson Corporation v. 1:11cv00296 Voluntary Dismissal 4.1 Giantplus Technology, Co., Ltd. et al Walker Digital LLC v. 1:11cv00317 Voluntary Dismissal 2.3 BuyWithMe Inc. et al Sharing Sound LLC v. Audio 1:11cv00349 Voluntary Dismissal 5.4 and Video Labs, Inc. et al Walker Digital LLC v. 1:11cv00361 Voluntary Dismissal 2.0 Google Inc. Tessenderlo Kerley Inc. v. 1:11cv00506 Voluntary Dismissal 2.8 Purfresh Inc. Butamax(TM) Advanced 1:11cv00697 Voluntary Dismissal 1.2 Biofuels LLC v. Gevo Inc. 99 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Appriss Inc. v. Information 1:11cv00719 Voluntary Dismissal 6.2 Strategies Inc. Hot Headz International Inc. 1:11cv00746 Voluntary Dismissal 16.0 et al v. The Bridge Direct Inc. Digital CBT LLC v. TiVo Inc. 1:11cv00917 Voluntary Dismissal 5.5 Echopharm USA LLC v. 1:11cv01042 Voluntary Dismissal 1.0 Ralco Nutrition Inc. YYZ LLC v Fujitsu America 1:12cv00167 Voluntary Dismissal 8.7 Inc. et al. Pfizer Inc. et al v. 1:12cv00261 Voluntary Dismissal 3.9 McNeil-PPC Inc. Computer Software 1:12cv00451 Voluntary Dismissal 27.8 Protection LLC v. Adobe Systems Incorporated Computer Software 1:12cv00453 Voluntary Dismissal 2.7 Protection LLC v. Mathworks Inc. Terez v. Audience 1:12cv00539 Voluntary Dismissal 3.7 Corporation Alcorn Communications LLC 1:12cv00543 Voluntary Dismissal 4.9 v. Vocus Inc. Alcorn Communications LLC 1:12cv00576 Voluntary Dismissal 3.1 v. Implix USA INC. Novartis Pharmaceuticals 1:12cv00596 Voluntary Dismissal 6.0 Corporation v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al OSI Pharmaceuticals LLC et 1:12cv00644 Voluntary Dismissal 0.0 al v. Roxane Laboratories INC. Alcorn Communications LLC 1:12cv00705 Voluntary Dismissal 4.0 v. VerticalResponse Inc. Recognicorp LLC v. Oakley 1:12cv00844 Voluntary Dismissal 4.0 Capital Private Equity et al 100 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Mobile Logistics LLC v. 1:12cv00884 Voluntary Dismissal 1.2 Dimension Trucking Services Inc. Mobile Logistics LLC v. 1:12cv00890 Voluntary Dismissal 0.7 Shaw Industries Inc. Mobile Logistics LLC v. 1:12cv00892 Voluntary Dismissal 3.4 Transfreight LLC Lennon Image Technologies 1:12cv00900 Voluntary Dismissal 3.3 LLC v. Boucheron Joaillerie USA Inc. Alcorn Communications LLC 1:12cv00967 Voluntary Dismissal 2.3 v. Direct IQ LLC Mobile Logistics LLC v. 1:12cv01002 Voluntary Dismissal 11.2 Penske Logistics LLC Activision TV, Inc. v. 1:12cv01007 Voluntary Dismissal 5.0 Adspace Networks Inc. Activision TV, Inc. v. E-Cast 1:12cv01008 Voluntary Dismissal 16.3 Inc. Orientview Technologies 1:12cv01016 Voluntary Dismissal 13.8 LLC v. SkyMall Inc. lululemon athletica canada 1:12cv01034 Voluntary Dismissal 3.3 inc. v. Calvin Klein Inc. et al Orientview Technologies 1:12cv01095 Voluntary Dismissal 3.4 LLC v. Iconix Group Inc. Internet Media Interactive 1:12cv01192 Voluntary Dismissal 3.8 Corporation v. E.W. Scripps Company Internet Media Interactive 1:12cv01195 Voluntary Dismissal 5.0 Corporation v. Times Publishing Company LED Tech Development LLC 1:12cv01260 Voluntary Dismissal 3.9 v. Home Depot USA Inc.

101 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01271 Voluntary Dismissal 4.4 v. Document Solutions Inc. et al Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01273 Voluntary Dismissal 5.2 v. NEC Corporation et al Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01274 Voluntary Dismissal 4.1 v. Co. Ltd. et al Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01275 Voluntary Dismissal 15.4 v. Panasonic Corporation et al Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01278 Voluntary Dismissal 4.3 v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01279 Voluntary Dismissal 4.8 v. Sharp Corporation et al Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01329 Voluntary Dismissal 3.0 v. IC Intracom USA LLC et al Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01330 Voluntary Dismissal 5.7 v. Lantronix Inc. Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:12cv01334 Voluntary Dismissal 7.8 v. TP-Link Technologies Co. Ltd, et al. Sprogis v. Google Inc. 1:12cv01351 Voluntary Dismissal 8.9 Internet Media Interactive 1:12cv01408 Voluntary Dismissal 3.6 Corporation v. New York Times Company ORG Structure Innovations 1:12cv01444 Voluntary Dismissal 1.0 LLC v. Aegis USA Inc. ORG Structure Innovations 1:12cv01445 Voluntary Dismissal 7.0 LLC v. Allen Systems Group, Inc. ORG Structure Innovations 1:12cv01447 Voluntary Dismissal 6.7 LLC v. Courion Corporation 102 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

ORG Structure Innovations 1:12cv01448 Voluntary Dismissal 1.9 LLC v. Evidian Systems Inc. ORG Structure Innovations 1:12cv01450 Voluntary Dismissal 3.9 LLC v. Simeio Solutions LLC ORG Structure Innovations 1:12cv01451 Voluntary Dismissal 8.1 LLC v. Symplified Inc. Orientview Technologies 1:12cv01486 Voluntary Dismissal 3.9 LLC v. Just Fabulous Inc. Peschke Map Technologies 1:12cv01526 Voluntary Dismissal 9.7 LLC v. Lerner Corporation Peschke Map Technologies 1:12cv01529 Voluntary Dismissal 3.0 LLC v. Tarragon LLC Peschke Map Technologies 1:12cv01530 Voluntary Dismissal 24.3 LLC v. Urban Retail Properties LLC Peschke Map Technologies 1:12cv01570 Voluntary Dismissal 9.5 LLC v. Glimcher Colonial Park Mall, Inc., et al. Brandywine 1:12cv01763 Voluntary Dismissal 3.0 Communications Technologies LLC v. D.B. Solutions Inc. Brandywine 1:12cv01764 Voluntary Dismissal 1.2 Communications Technologies LLC v. Getnet Inc. Brandywine 1:12cv01765 Voluntary Dismissal 7.5 Communications Technologies LLC v. InReach Internet Inc. Brandywine 1:12cv01766 Voluntary Dismissal 3.6 Communications Technologies LLC v. LinkLine Communications Inc. 103 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Brandywine 1:12cv01768 Voluntary Dismissal 1.7 Communications Technologies LLC v. O.T.T. Communications Incorporated Princeton Digital Image 1:12cv01776 Voluntary Dismissal 4.0 Corporation v. Simbionix LTD. et al Princeton Digital Image 1:12cv01777 Voluntary Dismissal 8.3 Corporation v. CAE Healthcare USA Inc. et al Brandywine 1:12cv01781 Voluntary Dismissal 6.3 Communications Technologies LLC v. Alcatel Lucent USA Inc. Brandywine 1:12cv01783 Voluntary Dismissal 2.8 Communications Technologies LLC v. Barracuda Networks Inc. Brandywine 1:12cv01785 Voluntary Dismissal 9.1 Communications Technologies LLC v. Grandstream Networks Inc. Brandywine 1:12cv01786 Voluntary Dismissal 4.7 Communications Technologies LLC v. Mitel Networks Inc. Genetic Technologies 1:13cv00055 Voluntary Dismissal 6.5 Limited v. General Genetics Corporation Effective Exploration LLC v. 1:14cv00227 Voluntary Dismissal 2.9 Whiting Oil and Gas Corp. Effective Exploration LLC v. 1:14cv00226 Voluntary Dismissal 2.4 Petro-Hunt LLC Effective Exploration LLC v. 1:14cv00221 Voluntary Dismissal 3.6 104 EOG Resources Inc. Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

ORG Structure Innovations 1:13cv01850 Voluntary Dismissal 7.9 LLC v. Centrify Corporation Forest Laboratories Inc. et al 1:13cv01830 Voluntary Dismissal 4.0 v. Sandoz Inc. Orientview Technologies 1:13cv00065 Voluntary Dismissal 4.1 LLC v. ShoeDazzle.com Inc. Brandywine 1:13cv00108 Voluntary Dismissal 0.9 Communications Technologies LLC v. Empire One Telecommunications Inc. Alcorn Communications LLC 1:13cv00109 Voluntary Dismissal 3.4 v. PR Newswire Association LLC Alcorn Communications LLC 1:13cv00142 Voluntary Dismissal 2.9 v. eMinor Inc. Orientview Technologies 1:13cv00221 Voluntary Dismissal 2.7 LLC v. Shop It To Me Inc. North Star Innovations, Inc. 1:16cv01182 Voluntary Dismissal 1.4 v. Xilinx, Inc. Alcorn Communications LLC 1:13cv00246 Voluntary Dismissal 12.5 v. ABN Newswire LLC Apicore US LLC v. Pfizer 1:16cv01174 Voluntary Dismissal 0.5 Inc. Fidelity National Information 1:13cv00426 Voluntary Dismissal 2.1 Services Inc. v. Sonic Industry LLC Wireless Media Innovations 1:13cv00529 Voluntary Dismissal 10.8 LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Inc. Wireless Media Innovations 1:13cv00534 Voluntary Dismissal 4.7 LLC v. The Gap Inc. Wireless Media Innovations 1:13cv00535 Voluntary Dismissal 3.6 LLC v. Safeway Inc. 105 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Orientview Technologies 1:13cv00556 Voluntary Dismissal 2.4 LLC v. Beachmint Inc. Automated Transactions 1:13cv00586 Voluntary Dismissal 4.0 LLC v. Bogota Savings Bank Automated Transactions 1:13cv00589 Voluntary Dismissal 0.2 LLC v. Enterprise National Bank Automated Transactions 1:13cv00590 Voluntary Dismissal 21.2 LLC v. First Bank Automated Transactions 1:13cv00597 Voluntary Dismissal 3.7 LLC v. Buffalo Service Credit Union Automated Transactions 1:13cv00598 Voluntary Dismissal 3.8 LLC v. Buffalo Community Federal Credit Union Alcorn Communications LLC 1:13cv00755 Voluntary Dismissal 2.1 v. Business Wire Inc. Orientview Technologies 1:13cv01068 Voluntary Dismissal 4.5 LLC v. Hat World Corporation Alcorn Communications LLC 1:13cv01046 Voluntary Dismissal 1.0 v. Constant Contact Inc. Joao Bock Transaction 1:14cv00089 Voluntary Dismissal 3.3 Systems LLC v. MasterCard Incorporated Data Speed Technology LLC 1:14cv00035 Voluntary Dismissal 2.6 v. MindJet LLC Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. 1:14cv00254 Voluntary Dismissal 3.5 Logitech Inc. Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. 1:14cv00251 Voluntary Dismissal 0.8 Franklin Electronic Publishers Inc. Effective Exploration LLC v. 1:14cv00225 Voluntary Dismissal 3.2 Petro Harvester Operating Company LLC 106 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Effective Exploration LLC v. 1:14cv00224 Voluntary Dismissal 4.9 Murex Petroleum Corp. MPHJ Technology 1:14cv00005 Voluntary Dismissal 5.2 Investments LLC v. Huhtamaki Americas Inc. MPHJ Technology 1:14cv00004 Voluntary Dismissal 5.4 Investments LLC v. Dillard's Inc. ORG Structure Innovations 1:13cv02054 Voluntary Dismissal 7.3 LLC v. Agiliance Inc. Mobile Logistics LLC v. 1:13cv02028 Voluntary Dismissal 2.0 Zebra Technologies Corporation Mobile Logistics LLC v. 1:13cv02027 Voluntary Dismissal 2.7 Honeywell International Inc. Eclipse IP LLC v. CafePress 1:13cv01711 Voluntary Dismissal 1.6 Inc. Eclipse IP LLC v. American 1:13cv01710 Voluntary Dismissal 3.6 Apparel Inc. Eclipse IP LLC v. 1:13cv01709 Voluntary Dismissal 0.2 Aeropostale Inc. Internet Media Interactive 1:13cv00818 Voluntary Dismissal 1.8 Corporation v. Quantumdigital Inc. Mobile Logistics LLC v. Atlas 1:13cv00899 Voluntary Dismissal 2.0 RFID Holdings Inc., et al Mobile Logistics LLC v 1:13cv00900 Voluntary Dismissal 4.6 Confidex Inc. Mobile Logistics LLC v. 1:13cv00902 Voluntary Dismissal 3.3 Intelleflex Corporation Mobile Logistics LLC v. 1:13cv00903 Voluntary Dismissal 1.4 International Audio Visual Inc. Mobile Logistics LLC v. 1:13cv00901 Voluntary Dismissal 3.0 Fluensee Inc. 107 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Mobile Logistics LLC v 1:13cv00904 Voluntary Dismissal 3.8 Motorola Solutions Inc. Mobile Logistics LLC v 1:13cv00906 Voluntary Dismissal 4.5 RedPrairie Corp. Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:13cv00907 Voluntary Dismissal 8.1 v. Ingenico S.A. et al Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:13cv00908 Voluntary Dismissal 5.0 v. Equinox Payments LLC Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:13cv00909 Voluntary Dismissal 3.4 v. Verifone Systems Inc. Activision TV Inc. v. 1:13cv00981 Voluntary Dismissal 10.0 Harley-Davidson Inc. Activision TV Inc. v. CSG 1:13cv00982 Voluntary Dismissal 10.0 Systems Inc. Data Speed Technology LLC 1:13cv01050 Voluntary Dismissal 1.5 v. Canon U.S.A. Inc. Data Speed Technology LLC 1:13cv01051 Voluntary Dismissal 1.5 v. Fujitsu America Inc. Security Technology LLC v. 1:13cv01140 Voluntary Dismissal 1.9 Asurion LLC Activision TV Inc. v. Mazda 1:13cv01201 Voluntary Dismissal 8.8 Motor of America Inc. KeySee Software Ltd. v. 1:13cv01233 Voluntary Dismissal 4.0 Verint Systems Inc. Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:13cv01249 Voluntary Dismissal 8.4 v. ATM Systems Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:13cv01250 Voluntary Dismissal 10.1 v. Seiko Epson Corp. et al Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:13cv01251 Voluntary Dismissal 3.0 v. Equinox Payments LLC Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:13cv01253 Voluntary Dismissal 9.6 v. Dell Inc. Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:13cv01252 Voluntary Dismissal 7.8 v. Cardtronics Inc. et al 108 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:13cv01254 Voluntary Dismissal 8.2 v. Hiro Inc. Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:13cv01255 Voluntary Dismissal 10.5 v. Ingenico S.A. et al Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:13cv01259 Voluntary Dismissal 8.4 v. TP-Link Technologies Co. Ltd et al. Telecomm Innovations LLC 1:13cv01260 Voluntary Dismissal 7.7 v. TRENDnet Inc. Activision TV Inc. v. Nevada 1:13cv01360 Voluntary Dismissal 10.8 Property 1 LLC Eclipse IP LLC v Avon 1:13cv01364 Voluntary Dismissal 2.8 Products Inc. Eclipse IP LLC v. Fanatics 1:13cv01366 Voluntary Dismissal 0.7 Inc. Eclipse IP LLC v. Estee 1:13cv01367 Voluntary Dismissal 1.1 Lauder Companies Inc. Eclipse IP LLC v. Office 1:13cv01370 Voluntary Dismissal 0.9 Depot Inc. Eclipse IP LLC v. OfficeMax 1:13cv01371 Voluntary Dismissal 0.9 North America Inc. Eclipse IP LLC v. Sears 1:13cv01373 Voluntary Dismissal 1.5 Holdings Corporation Activision TV Inc. v. Colbea 1:13cv01388 Voluntary Dismissal 3.7 Enterprises LLC Activision TV Inc. v. Tri Star 1:13cv01389 Voluntary Dismissal 5.2 Energy LLC Activision TV Inc. v. Gulf Oil 1:13cv01396 Voluntary Dismissal 5.0 Limited Partnership Data Speed Technology LLC 1:13cv01446 Voluntary Dismissal 5.0 v. Cincom Systems Inc. Data Speed Technology LLC 1:13cv01448 Voluntary Dismissal 18.3 v. Document Logistix Ltd. et al 109 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Data Speed Technology LLC 1:13cv01449 Voluntary Dismissal 4.6 v. Fiserv Inc. et al Activision TV Inc. v. White 1:13cv01472 Voluntary Dismissal 12.3 Castle Management Co. Activelight Inc. v. Cosi Inc. 1:13cv01471 Voluntary Dismissal 12.3 Wireless Media Innovations 1:13cv01546 Voluntary Dismissal 2.3 LLC v. Provide Commerce Inc. Computer Software 1:13cv01638 Voluntary Dismissal 7.0 Protection LLC v. Microsoft Corporation Preservation Technologies 1:13cv01692 Voluntary Dismissal 0.2 LLC v. Target Brands Inc. Preservation Technologies 1:13cv01693 Voluntary Dismissal 0.2 LLC v. Vimeo LLC ORG Structure Innovations 1:13cv01902 Voluntary Dismissal 7.3 LLC v. Jamcracker Inc. Effective Exploration LLC v. 1:14cv00140 Voluntary Dismissal 5.4 Newfield Exploration Company Speed Monitoring 1:14cv00345 Voluntary Dismissal 4.7 Technologies LLC v. BMW of North America LLC Speed Monitoring 1:14cv00346 Voluntary Dismissal 5.5 Technologies LLC v. Volvo Cars of North America LLC Internet Media Interactive 1:14cv00347 Voluntary Dismissal 6.4 Corporation v. AARP Services Inc. Spherix Incorporated v. 1:14cv00374 Voluntary Dismissal 0.6 Cisco Systems Inc. Selene Communication 1:14cv00402 Voluntary Dismissal 3.1 Technologies LLC v. Open Text Corporation et al 110 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Joao Bock Transaction 1:14cv00528 Voluntary Dismissal 2.6 Systems LLC v. TD Bank National Association Joao Bock Transaction 1:14cv00531 Voluntary Dismissal 1.4 Systems LLC v. SunTrust Banks Inc. et al Selene Communication 1:14cv00537 Voluntary Dismissal 1.9 Technologies LLC v. Microsoft Corporation MasterCard Incorporated v. 1:14cv00603 Voluntary Dismissal 4.6 Open Network Solutions Inc. Open Network Solutions Inc. 1:14cv00620 Voluntary Dismissal 2.3 v. Google Inc. Open Network Solutions Inc. 1:14cv00621 Voluntary Dismissal 5.8 v. Microsoft Corporation Open Network Solutions Inc. 1:14cv00650 Voluntary Dismissal 3.7 v. Wincor Nixdorf International GmbH, et al. Open Network Solutions Inc. 1:14cv00651 Voluntary Dismissal 4.3 v. Advanced Digital Broadcast Holdings SA Open Network Solutions Inc. 1:14cv00653 Voluntary Dismissal 5.5 v. Seiko Epson Corporation, et al. Open Network Solutions Inc. 1:14cv00674 Voluntary Dismissal 1.9 v. Koninklijke Philips, N.V., et al. Open Network Solutions Inc. 1:14cv00675 Voluntary Dismissal 4.1 v. Nautilus Hyosung America Inc. Open Network Solutions Inc. 1:14cv00701 Voluntary Dismissal 8.1 v. Hisense Company Ltd. et al Open Network Solutions Inc. 1:14cv00831 Voluntary Dismissal 4.1 v. HTC Corporation et al 111 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Sequent Data LLC v. 1:14cv00857 Voluntary Dismissal 4.1 Hitachi-LG Data Storage Korea Inc. et al. Sequent Data LLC v. 1:14cv00863 Voluntary Dismissal 11.5 Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corporation, et al. Sequent Data LLC v. 1:14cv00864 Voluntary Dismissal 4.8 Verbatim Americas LLC, et al. Network Congestion 1:14cv00900 Voluntary Dismissal 2.3 Solutions LLC v. Mediacom Communications Corporation Alcon Pharmaceuticals Ltd 1:14cv00930 Voluntary Dismissal 2.6 et al v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. et al Recordati Rare Diseases 1:14cv00956 Voluntary Dismissal 1.6 Inc. v. Exela Pharma Sciences LLC et al Activelight Inc. v. GoGo 1:14cv00965 Voluntary Dismissal 0.7 Media Networks Inc. Alcon Pharmaceuticals Ltd 1:14cv00970 Voluntary Dismissal 6.0 et al v. Watson Laboratories Inc. et al Janssen Pharmaceuticals 1:14cv01088 Voluntary Dismissal 0.1 Inc. v. VIVUS Inc. Preservation Technologies 1:14cv01292 Voluntary Dismissal 3.8 LLC v. Mindgeek USA Incorporated Agiliance Inc. v. Telos 1:14cv01327 Voluntary Dismissal 6.7 Corporation Wireless Media Innovations 1:14cv01378 Voluntary Dismissal 18.2 LLC v. PCI of Virginia LLC Round Rock Research LLC 1:14cv01456 Voluntary Dismissal 3.7 112 v. SanDisk Corp. Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Eli Lilly and Company et al v. 1:14cv01474 Voluntary Dismissal 0.9 Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC Quest Integrity USA LLC v. A 1:14cv01481 Voluntary Dismissal 1.1 Hak Industrial Services US LLC Cyberfone Systems LLC v. 1:14cv01490 Voluntary Dismissal 11.0 Ricoh Americas Corp. et al Treehouse Avatar 1:14cv01534 Voluntary Dismissal 1.1 Technologies Inc. v. Snail Games USA Inc. Horizon Pharma Ireland 1:15cv00043 Voluntary Dismissal 3.4 Limited et al v. Paddock Laboratories LLC et al Boehringer Ingelheim 1:15cv00048 Voluntary Dismissal 3.2 Pharma GmbH & Co. KG et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et al Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. 1:15cv00069 Voluntary Dismissal 4.8 Belkin International Inc. Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. 1:15cv00070 Voluntary Dismissal 4.1 Monster Inc. B Therapy LLC v. SenoRX 1:15cv00082 Voluntary Dismissal 2.0 Inc. et al. B Therapy LLC v. Varian 1:15cv00083 Voluntary Dismissal 2.9 Medical Systems Inc. B Therapy LLC v. Xoft Inc. et 1:15cv00084 Voluntary Dismissal 1.2 al. Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. 1:15cv00086 Voluntary Dismissal 11.8 Circus World Display Ltd. Senju Pharmaceutical Co. 1:15cv00087 Voluntary Dismissal 4.4 Ltd. et al v. Paddock Laboratories LLC et al Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. 1:15cv00118 Voluntary Dismissal 3.2 113 et al. Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. 1:15cv00119 Voluntary Dismissal 3.0 Panasonic Corporation et al. Medac Pharma Inc. et al v. 1:15cv00120 Voluntary Dismissal 2.4 Antares Pharma Inc. Media Bridge LLC v. 1:15cv00123 Voluntary Dismissal 7.2 Thinaire Transmedia Network Inc. Sapphire Dolphin LLC v 1:15cv00145 Voluntary Dismissal 6.7 Velodyne Acoustics Inc. B Therapy LLC v. Best 1:15cv00167 Voluntary Dismissal 1.3 Medical International Inc. Gilead Sciences Inc. et al v. 1:15cv00289 Voluntary Dismissal 0.9 Watson Laboratories Inc. et al Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. 1:15cv00308 Voluntary Dismissal 1.3 E&S International Enterprises Inc. et al Telescope Time LLC v. 1:15cv00322 Voluntary Dismissal 3.9 Wevideo Inc. Blackbird Tech LLC v. AP 1:15cv00396 Voluntary Dismissal 4.2 Products Inc. Blackbird Tech LLC v. 1:15cv00397 Voluntary Dismissal 4.2 Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation Internet Media Interactive 1:15cv00455 Voluntary Dismissal 2.5 Corporation v. General Nutrition Investment Company et al Internet Media Interactive 1:15cv00457 Voluntary Dismissal 2.2 Corporation v. Select Comfort Corporation GovX, Inc. v. Shipping and 1:15cv00605 Voluntary Dismissal 4.5 Transit LLC Collabo Innovations Inc. v. 1:15cv00608 Voluntary Dismissal 6.9 Toshiba Corporation et al 114 Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Janssen Biotech Inc. et al v. 1:15cv00679 Voluntary Dismissal 2.8 Par Pharmaceutical Inc. et al Collabo Innovations Inc. v. 1:15cv00783 Voluntary Dismissal 5.3 Advanced Semiconductor Engineering Inc. et al Sage Labs Inc. v. 1:15cv00791 Voluntary Dismissal 2.4 Transposagen Biopharmaceuticals Inc. Internet Media Interactive 1:15cv00826 Voluntary Dismissal 1.4 Corporation v. Cuisinarts Corporation et al CommScope, Inc. of North 1:15cv00837 Voluntary Dismissal 3.2 Carolina et al v. Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd. North Star Innovations Inc. 1:15cv01105 Voluntary Dismissal 5.4 v. Arkadin Inc. et al North Star Innovations Inc. 1:15cv01106 Voluntary Dismissal 5.4 v. Polycom Inc. North Star Innovations Inc. 1:15cv01107 Voluntary Dismissal 5.4 v. Vidyo, Inc. UCB, Inc. v. Alza 1:15cv01192 Voluntary Dismissal 3.9 Corporation 6115187 Canada Inc. v. 1:16cv00002 Voluntary Dismissal 6.8 Samsung Techwin America et al Lux Products Corp. v. 1:16cv00012 Voluntary Dismissal 3.6 Elementi Moderni, LLC IP Communication 1:16cv00147 Voluntary Dismissal 2.8 Solutions, LLC v. Facebook, Inc. Eli Lilly and Company v. 1:16cv00167 Voluntary Dismissal 2.9 Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al North Star Innovations Inc. 1:16cv00446 Voluntary Dismissal 1.9 115 v. Sharp Electronics Corp. Voluntary Dismissal There was/were 1002 case(s) terminated by Voluntary Dismissal. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 12.7. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Voluntary Dismissal 80

70

60

50

40

30 Number of Cases 20

10

0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 49 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

PRO Orthopedic Devices, 1:16cv00457 Voluntary Dismissal 1.7 Inc. v. Ortho Equine LLC Segway Inc. et al v. 1:16cv00535 Voluntary Dismissal 7.7 Shenzhen Chenduoxing Electronic Technology Ltd., China Segway Inc. et al v. Nanjing 1:16cv00536 Voluntary Dismissal 7.7 Fastwheel Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Segway Inc. et al v. 1:16cv00537 Voluntary Dismissal 7.7 Hovershop Segway Inc. et al v. 1:16cv00539 Voluntary Dismissal 7.7 PhunkeeDuck, Inc., Alcon Pharmaceuticals Ltd. 1:16cv00563 Voluntary Dismissal 3.4 et al v. Imprimis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. HID Global Corporation et al 1:16cv00597 Voluntary Dismissal 5.1 v. ICEPAT AG et al Human Design Medical, LLC 1:16cv00767 Voluntary Dismissal 3.0 v. My Health, Inc. Alcon Research Ltd. v. 1:16cv00906 Voluntary Dismissal 1.8 Apotex Inc. et al Eli Lilly and Company et al v. 1:16cv01005 Voluntary Dismissal 2.9 Cipla Limited et al United Therapeutics 1:16cv01066 Voluntary Dismissal 0.4 Corporation v. Par Sterile Products, LLC et al

116 Want of Prosecution There was/were 27 case(s) terminated by Want of Prosecution. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 29.1. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Want of Prosecution 14

12

10

8

6

Number of Cases 4

2

0 9 27 33 46 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Human Genome Sciences 1:08cv00166 Want of Prosecution 8.8 Inc. v. Genentech Inc. Golden Bridge Technology 1:11cv00165 Want of Prosecution 45.7 Inc. v. Amazon.Com Inc. et al Golden Bridge Technology 1:12cv00471 Want of Prosecution 32.1 Inc. v. Motorola Mobility LLC Golden Bridge Technology 1:12cv00473 Want of Prosecution 32.1 Inc. V. Sierra Wireless Inc. et al Golden Bridge Technology 1:12cv00476 Want of Prosecution 32.1 Inc. v. Pantech Corp et al Golden Bridge Technology 1:12cv00475 Want of Prosecution 32.1 Inc. v. Dell Inc. Golden Bridge Technology 1:12cv00477 Want of Prosecution 32.1 Inc. v. HTC Corp. et al Golden Bridge Technology 1:12cv00478 Want of Prosecution 32.1 Inc. v. LG Electronics Inc. et al Golden Bridge Technology 1:12cv00479 Want of Prosecution 32.1 Inc. v. Research In Motion Limited et al Golden Bridge Technology 1:12cv00480 Want of Prosecution 32.1 Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company Golden Bridge Technology 1:12cv00481 Want of Prosecution 32.1 Inc. v. Sony Electronics Inc. et al. Golden Bridge Technology 1:12cv00482 Want of Prosecution 32.1 Inc. v. ZTE Corporation et al. Golden Bridge Technology 1:12cv00483 Want of Prosecution 32.1 Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. Golden Bridge Technology 1:12cv01157 Want of Prosecution 26.9 Inc. v. Barnes & Noble 117 Inc. et al Want of Prosecution There was/were 27 case(s) terminated by Want of Prosecution. The average time to case termination in months from case filing was 29.1. The distribution of these outcomes by month of litigation is shown below. Months with no outcomes are omitted from the chart. Cases still pending after four years (if any) are lumped into month "49".

Distribution of Closed Cases by Month For Want of Prosecution 14

12

10

8

6

Number of Cases 4

2

0 9 27 33 46 Month of Litigation The supporting data is shown below. Case Name Case Number Outcome Pendency

Golden Bridge Technology 1:12cv01158 Want of Prosecution 26.9 Inc. v. HTC Corp. et al Golden Bridge Technology 1:12cv01159 Want of Prosecution 26.9 Inc. v. Motorola Mobility LLC Golden Bridge Technology 1:12cv01160 Want of Prosecution 26.9 Inc. v. Pantech Corp., et al. Golden Bridge Technology 1:12cv01161 Want of Prosecution 26.9 Inc. v. Sierra Wireless Inc., et al. Golden Bridge Technology 1:12cv01162 Want of Prosecution 26.9 Inc. v. ZTE (USA) Inc., et al. Golden Bridge Technology 1:12cv01163 Want of Prosecution 26.9 Inc. v. Dell Inc. Golden Bridge Technology 1:12cv01164 Want of Prosecution 26.9 Inc. v. Lenovo (United States) Inc. et al Golden Bridge Technology 1:12cv01165 Want of Prosecution 26.9 Inc. v. LG Electronics Inc. et al Golden Bridge Technology 1:12cv01166 Want of Prosecution 26.9 Inc. v. Research In Motion Limited et al Golden Bridge Technology 1:12cv01167 Want of Prosecution 26.9 Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et al Golden Bridge Technology 1:12cv01168 Want of Prosecution 26.9 Inc. v. Sony Electronics Inc. et al Golden Bridge Technology 1:12cv01169 Want of Prosecution 26.9 Inc. v Amazon.Com Inc. Golden Bridge Technology 1:12cv01170 Want of Prosecution 26.9 Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al.

118 Awards and Settlement Amounts: The awards or settlement amounts found in these cases (if any) are shown below.

Case Name Case Number Case Outcome Date of Decision Amount

Bayer AG, et al v. Housey 1:01cv00148 Bench Trial 12/8/2003 $1,874,571 Pharmaceutica, et al Kao Corporation, et al v. 1:01cv00680 Bench Trial 10/4/2004 $6,306 Unilever U S Inc., et al Alcoa Inc. v. Alcan Inc. et al 1:06cv00383 Consent Judgment 7/26/2007 $5,000 Cordis Corporation v. Boston 1:08cv00779 Consent Judgment 2/2/2010 $1,725,000,000 Scientific Corporation et al Symbol Technologies v. 1:01cv00801 Jury Verdict 8/4/2004 $25,917,669 Proxim Inc. IMX, Inc. v. E-Loan, Inc., et 1:03cv01067 Jury Verdict 1/10/2007 $8,691,600 al TruePosition Inc. v. Andrew 1:05cv00747 Jury Verdict 9/18/2007 $45,300,000 Corporation Siemens Medical Solutions 1:07cv00190 Jury Verdict 10/2/2008 $50,469,703 USA Inc. v. Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics Inc. Boston Scientific 1:10cv00315 Jury Verdict 3/13/2012 $41,500,000 Corporation et al v. Cordis Corporation Elster Electricity v. 1:01cv00077 Jury Verdict 6/20/2003 $22,300,028 SchlumbergerSema Inc SRI International Inc. v. 1:13cv01534 Jury Verdict 5/25/2017 $56,954,830 Cisco Systems Inc. Intuitive Surgical, et al v. 1:01cv00203 Jury Verdict 12/11/2002 $4,442,605 Computer Motion Inc.

119 Appeal Outcomes: There have been 130 appealed cases. The results of those appeals (if any) are shown below. Note that the appeal may be an interlocutory appeal or an appeal of a final judgment. The complete affirmance rate (affirmance with no other action), affirmed at least in part rate, and the reversed at least in part rate are shown below.

Win Rates on Appeal 90 80.2 80

70

60 58.1

50

40 Percentage 30 22.1 20

10

0 Complete Affirmance Affirmed at Least in Part Reversed at Least in Part

Case Name Case Number Case Outcome Appeal Outcome

Cephalon Inc. v. Watson 1:09cv00724 Bench Trial Affirmed Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al Takeda Pharmaceutical 1:06cv00033 Bench Trial Affirmed Company LTD. et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. Endo Pharmaceuticals 1:14cv01422 Bench Trial Pending Solutions Inc. et al v. Custopharm Inc. Praxair Inc., et al v. ATMI 1:03cv01158 Bench Trial Affirmed,Reversed,Remand Inc., et al ed Forest Laboratories 1:13cv01602 Bench Trial Pending Holdings Ltd. et al v. Apotex Corp. et al Senju Pharmaceutical Co. 1:07cv00779 Bench Trial Affirmed Ltd. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al Cancer Research 1:07cv00457 Bench Trial Reversed Technology Limited v. Barr Laboratories Inc. et al Cephalon Inc. et al v. Mylan 1:11cv00164 Bench Trial Dismissed Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al Kao Corporation, et al v. 1:01cv00680 Bench Trial Affirmed Unilever U S Inc., et al Pronova BioPharma Norge 1:09cv00286 Bench Trial Reversed,Remanded AS v. Teva Pharamceuticals USA, Inc. Intendis GmbH et al v. 1:13cv00421 Bench Trial Affirmed Glenmark Generics Limited et al Vanderbilt University v. ICOS 1:05cv00506 Bench Trial Affirmed Corporation 120 Aptalis Pharmatech Inc. et al 1:14cv01038 Bench Trial Pending v. Apotex Inc. et al Medtronic Inc. v. Boston 1:07cv00823 Bench Trial Affirmed,Vacated,Remanded Scientific Corporation et al Bayer AG, et al v. Housey 1:01cv00148 Bench Trial Affirmed,Vacated,Remanded Pharmaceutica, et al Takeda Pharmaceutical 1:07cv00331 Bench Trial Affirmed Company Limited et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et al Atofina v. Great Lakes 1:02cv01250 Bench Trial Affirmed,Reversed Chemical Merck Sharp & Dohme 1:15cv00250 Bench Trial Pending Corp. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC In re: Cyclobenzaprine 1:09md02118 Bench Trial Affirmed,Reversed,Vacated, Hydrochloride Dismissed Extended-Release Capsule Patent Litigation OSI Pharmaceuticals Inc. et 1:09cv00185 Bench Trial Dismissed al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. In re: '318 Patent 1:05cv00356 Bench Trial Affirmed Infringement Litigation Merck Sharp & Dohme 1:14cv00874 Bench Trial Pending Corp. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. Genetics Institute LLC v. 1:08cv00290 Bench Trial Affirmed Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc. Medtronic Inc. v. Guidant 1:03cv00848 Bench Trial Affirmed Corporation, et al Senju Pharmaceutical Co. 1:11cv00271 Bench Trial Affirmed Ltd. et al v. Lupin Limited et al Bayer Healthcare AG et al v. 1:06cv00234 Bench Trial Dismissed Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. Allergan Inc. v. Barr 1:09cv00333 Bench Trial Affirmed Laboratories Inc. Cephalon Inc. et al v. 1:08cv00330 Bench Trial Affirmed,Reversed Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al Novo Nordisk Pharm., et al 1:02cv00332 Bench Trial Affirmed,Vacated v. Bio-Technology Gen., et al HBAC MatchMaker Media 1:13cv00430 Consent Judgment Vacated,Remanded Inc. v. NBC Entertainment et al Poly-America L P v. API 1:14cv00599 Consent Judgment Pending Industries Inc. HBAC MatchMaker Media 1:13cv00436 Consent Judgment Vacated,Remanded Inc. v. Vevo LLC Cephalon Inc. et al v. Impax 1:11cv01152 Consent Judgment Affirmed Laboratories Inc. HBAC MatchMaker Media 1:13cv00429 Consent Judgment Vacated,Remanded Inc. v. Google Inc. et al HBAC MatchMaker Media 1:13cv00962 Consent Judgment Vacated,Remanded Inc. v. Blip Networks Inc. HBAC MatchMaker Media 1:13cv00433 Consent Judgment Vacated,Remanded Inc. v. Disney Online et al. HBAC MatchMaker Media 1:13cv00437 Consent Judgment Vacated,Remanded Inc. v. Viacom International 121 Inc. HBAC MatchMaker Media 1:13cv00428 Consent Judgment Vacated,Remanded Inc. v. CBS Interactive Inc. Senju Pharmaceutical Co. 1:12cv00159 Consent Judgment Dismissed Ltd. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al Vehicle Operation 1:13cv00539 Involuntary Dismissal Dismissed Technologies LLC v. Ford Motor Company Vehicle Operation 1:13cv00712 Involuntary Dismissal Dismissed Technologies LLC v. Mitsubishi Motors North America Inc. Vehicle Operation 1:13cv00541 Involuntary Dismissal Dismissed Technologies LLC v. Nissan North America Inc. Parus Holdings Inc. v. PNC 1:14cv01428 Involuntary Dismissal Pending Bank N.A. Apotex Inc., et al v. Pfizer 1:03cv00990 Involuntary Dismissal Vacated,Remanded,Dismiss Inc., et al ed Vehicle Operation 1:13cv00538 Involuntary Dismissal Dismissed Technologies LLC v. BMW of North America LLC Vehicle Operation 1:13cv00540 Involuntary Dismissal Dismissed Technologies LLC v. General Motors LLC Parus Holdings Inc. v. Sallie 1:14cv01427 Involuntary Dismissal Pending Mae Bank et al Drager Medical GmbH et al 1:13cv01656 Involuntary Dismissal Pending v. Allied Healthcare Products Inc. Goodman Manufacturing 1:13cv02014 Involuntary Dismissal Pending Company LP et al v. Carrier Corporation Vehicle Operation 1:13cv00542 Involuntary Dismissal Dismissed Technologies LLC v. Porsche Cars North America Inc. Parus Holdings Inc. v. 1:14cv01429 Involuntary Dismissal Pending SunTrust Bank et al Senju Pharmaceutical Co. 1:11cv01171 Involuntary Dismissal Affirmed Ltd. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al Boston Scientific 1:10cv00315 Jury Verdict Affirmed Corporation et al v. Cordis Corporation Intellectual Ventures I LLC et 1:11cv00908 Jury Verdict Pending al v. Motorola Mobility LLC Syngenta Seeds Inc. v. 1:02cv01331 Jury Verdict Affirmed Monsanto Company, et al Stambler v. RSA Security 1:01cv00065 Jury Verdict Affirmed Inc., et al Callaway Golf Company v. 1:06cv00091 Jury Verdict Affirmed,Reversed,Remand Acushnet Company ed SOITEC Silicon On Insulator 1:08cv00292 Jury Verdict Dismissed Technologies SA et al v. MEMC Electronic Materials Inc. Siemens Medical Solutions 1:07cv00190 Jury Verdict Affirmed,Vacated,Remanded USA Inc. v. Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics Inc. Ironworks Patents LLC v. 1:10cv00258 Jury Verdict Affirmed,Reversed,Vacated, Apple Inc. Remanded Asahi Glass Co Ltd. et al v. 1:09cv00515 Jury Verdict Dismissed Guardian Industries Corp. 122 McKesson Automation Inc. 1:06cv00028 Jury Verdict Affirmed v. Swisslog Holding AG et al Amgen Inc. et al v. Sanofi et 1:14cv01317 Jury Verdict Pending al Robert Bosch LLC v. Pylon 1:08cv00542 Jury Verdict Reversed,Remanded Manufacturing Corp Belden Technologies Inc. et 1:08cv00063 Jury Verdict Dismissed al v. Superior Essex Inc. et al IMX, Inc. v. E-Loan, Inc., et 1:03cv01067 Jury Verdict Dismissed al ArthroCare Corp. v. Smith & 1:01cv00504 Jury Verdict Affirmed,Reversed,Vacated, Nephew Inc., et al Remanded,Dismissed Intel Corporation v. 1:00cv00796 Jury Verdict Dismissed Broadcom Corporation INVISTA North America 1:11cv01007 Jury Verdict Affirmed S.ar.l. v. M&G USA Corporation et al Cordis Corporation v. Boston 1:03cv00027 Jury Verdict Affirmed,Reversed,Remand Scientific, et al ed ArcelorMittal France et al v. 1:10cv00050 Jury Verdict Affirmed,Reversed,Vacated, AK Steel Corporation et al Remanded Elster Electricity v. 1:01cv00077 Jury Verdict Affirmed SchlumbergerSema Inc TruePosition Inc. v. Andrew 1:05cv00747 Jury Verdict Affirmed Corporation Netgear Inc. v. Ruckus 1:10cv00999 Jury Verdict Dismissed Wireless Inc. Walker Digital LLC v. 1:12cv00140 Lack of Jurisdiction Affirmed Amazon.com Inc. Abbott Laboratories et al v. 1:06cv00613 Lack of Jurisdiction Affirmed Johnson and Johnson Inc. et al DNA Genotek Inc. v. 1:15cv00661 Lack of Jurisdiction Pending Spectrum DNA et al Walker Digital LLC v. 1:12cv00142 Lack of Jurisdiction Affirmed Expedia Inc. Innovative Therapies Inc. v. 1:07cv00589 Lack of Jurisdiction Affirmed Kinetic Concepts Inc. et al Walker Digital LLC v. 1:11cv00313 Lack of Jurisdiction Affirmed Expedia Inc. et al Walker Digital LLC v. Barnes 1:12cv00141 Lack of Jurisdiction Affirmed & Noble Inc. Human Genome Sciences 1:07cv00780 Lack of Jurisdiction Dismissed Inc. v. Immunex Corp. et al Hewlett-Packard Company 1:07cv00650 Lack of Jurisdiction Reversed,Remanded,Dismis v. Acceleron LLC sed Housey v. Abbott Pharm 1:01cv00401 Other Termination Affirmed Corp., et al Boston Sci Scimed, et al v. 1:03cv00283 Other Termination Reversed Cordis Corporation, et al Medtronic Vascular v. 1:04cv00034 Other Termination Affirmed Boston Scientific, et al Bio-Technology Gen. v. 1:02cv00235 Remand to State Court Dismissed Novo Nordisk A/S, et al Oracle Corporation et al v. 1:06cv00414 Summary Judgment Vacated,Remanded Parallel Networks LLC Quest Integrity USA LLC v. 1:14cv01483 Summary Judgment Pending Cokebusters USA Inc. Apeldyn Corporation v. AU 1:08cv00568 Summary Judgment Affirmed Optronics Corporation et al 123 Joao Bock Transaction 1:12cv01138 Summary Judgment Pending Systems LLC v. Jack Henry & Associates Inc. Rocep Lusol Holdings 1:05cv00141 Summary Judgment Dismissed Limited v. Permatex Inc. et al Helicos Biosciences 1:10cv00735 Summary Judgment Dismissed Corporation et al v. Illumina Inc Cordis Corporation v. Boston 1:10cv00039 Summary Judgment Affirmed,Vacated Scientific Corporation et al Monsanto Company, et al v. 1:04cv00305 Summary Judgment Affirmed Syngenta Seeds Inc., et al Rosebud LMS Inc. v. Adobe 1:14cv00194 Summary Judgment Affirmed Systems Incorporated Cloud Satchel LLC v. 1:13cv00941 Summary Judgment Affirmed Amazon.com Inc. ArcelorMittal et al v. AK 1:13cv00685 Summary Judgment Affirmed,Reversed,Remand Steel Corporation ed IGT v. Bally Gaming 1:06cv00282 Summary Judgment Affirmed International Inc. et al Quest Integrity USA LLC v. 1:14cv01482 Summary Judgment Pending Clean Harbors Industrial Services Inc. Cot'N Wash Inc. et al v. Sun 1:12cv00651 Summary Judgment Affirmed Products Corporation LP Matthews LLC v. Bath & 1:04cv01507 Summary Judgment Dismissed Body Works, et al Cradle IP LLC v. Texas 1:11cv01254 Summary Judgment Affirmed Instruments, Inc. Boston Scientific 1:07cv00765 Summary Judgment Affirmed Corporation et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc. et al CyberFone Systems LLC v. 1:11cv00831 Summary Judgment Affirmed Amazon.com Inc. et al Butamax (TM) Advanced 1:11cv00054 Summary Judgment Reversed,Vacated,Remande Biofuels LLC v. Gevo Inc. d Poly-America L P v. API 1:13cv00693 Summary Judgment Affirmed Industries Inc. Solvay S.A. v. Honeywell 1:06cv00557 Summary Judgment Affirmed,Reversed,Remand International Inc. ed Golden Bridge Technology 1:10cv00428 Summary Judgment Affirmed Inc. v. Apple Inc. et al Automated Transactions 1:06cv00043 Summary Judgment Affirmed LLC v. 7-Eleven Inc. et al Auxilium Pharmaceuticals 1:13cv00148 Summary Judgment Dismissed Inc. et al v. Upsher-Smith Laboratories Inc. Wellman Inc. v. Eastman 1:07cv00585 Summary Judgment Affirmed,Reversed,Remand Chemical Company ed Keurig Incorporated v. Sturm 1:10cv00841 Summary Judgment Affirmed Foods Inc. Izumi Products Co v. 1:02cv00156 Summary Judgment Affirmed Koninklijke Philips, et al BASF Corporation v. 1:14cv01204 Summary Judgment Pending Johnson Matthey Inc. SRI International v. Internet 1:04cv01199 Summary Judgment Affirmed,Vacated,Remanded Security, et al Accenture Global Services 1:07cv00826 Summary Judgment Affirmed GmbH et al v. Guidewire Software Inc. Toshiba Corporation v. 1:03cv01035 Summary Judgment Affirmed 124 Juniper Networks, et al Cloud Satchel LLC v. Barnes 1:13cv00942 Summary Judgment Affirmed Noble Inc. CyberFone Systems LLC v. 1:11cv00829 Summary Judgment Affirmed CNN Interactive Group Inc. et al Intermec Technologies Corp. 1:07cv00272 Summary Judgment Affirmed v. Palm Inc. ArcelorMittal France et al v. 1:13cv00686 Summary Judgment Affirmed,Remanded Severstal Dearborn LLC, et al Braintree Lab v. Schwarz 1:03cv00477 Voluntary Dismissal Dismissed Pharma Inc. Marvell International Ltd. v. 1:10cv00869 Voluntary Dismissal Reversed Link A Media Devices Corp CryoLife Inc. v. Medafor Inc. 1:14cv00559 Voluntary Dismissal Dismissed Medtronic Vascular v. Cordis 1:03cv00402 Voluntary Dismissal Vacated,Remanded Corporation Sun Optics Inc. v. FGX 1:07cv00137 Voluntary Dismissal Dismissed International Inc. Antares Pharma Inc. v. 1:14cv00270 Voluntary Dismissal Affirmed Medac Pharma Inc. et al Lab Corp of America, et al v. 1:03cv00364 Voluntary Dismissal Affirmed Chiron Corporation Human Genome Sciences 1:08cv00166 Want of Prosecution Dismissed Inc. v. Genentech Inc.

125 Motion Outcomes: The number of contested motion decisions, win rate, and time in months from motion filing to decision by Judge Robinson in these cases are shown below, broken out by motion type and movant. The movant for Markman decisions is listed as "Unknown" in LegalMetric's system because there is not requirement for an actual motion to initiate the claim construction process, and the win rate is arbitrarily set to "0". The stay motions listed below include all stay motions, not just stay pending IPR or stay pending reexamination motions. See following sections for details. For all motion types, the average win rate on plaintiff's motions was 44.7%, the average win rate on defendant's motions was 37.4% and the difference was 7.2%. The nationwide difference on plaintiff v. defendant motion win rates in patent cases is 6%.

Number Win Rate Pendency Bifurcation Total 14 64.3 2.6 Defendant 7 71.4 2.7

Plaintiff 7 57.1 2.5 Consolidate Total 29 27.6 2.8 Defendant 9 0.0 3.3

Plaintiff 20 40.0 2.5 Contempt Total 2 50.0 7.4 Plaintiff 2 50.0 7.4 Default Motion Total 9 77.8 1.0 Plaintiff 9 77.8 1.0 Discovery Total 166 61.7 1.9 Defendant 67 61.2 2.3

Plaintiff 91 61.0 1.5

Third Party 7 71.4 2.6

Unknown 1 100.0 0.0 Dismissal Total 270 43.3 6.0 Defendant 217 43.1 6.3

Plaintiff 52 43.3 4.8

Third Party 1 100.0 2.6 Exceptional Case Total 13 15.4 8.2 Defendant 10 20.0 8.2

Plaintiff 3 0.0 8.3 Expert/Daubert Total 172 43.0 2.2 Defendant 86 40.1 2.3

Plaintiff 85 45.3 2.1

Third Party 1 100.0 1.7 126 Number Win Rate Pendency Increased Damages Total 1 100.0 9.1 Plaintiff 1 100.0 9.1 Intervention Total 7 78.6 1.6 Plaintiff 1 100.0 0.2

Third Party 6 75.0 1.9 Judgment on the Total 13 50.0 4.8 Pleadings Defendant 11 59.1 5.0

Plaintiff 2 0.0 3.4 Markman Decision Total 112 0.9 25.7 Unknown 112 0.9 25.7 Permanent Injunction Total 19 47.4 7.7 Defendant 1 0.0 8.8

Plaintiff 18 50.0 7.6 Post-trial Total 118 14.4 8.2 Defendant 81 11.1 8.7

Plaintiff 37 21.6 7.1 Preliminary Injunction Total 34 35.3 5.7 Defendant 2 50.0 4.2

Plaintiff 32 34.4 5.8 Remand Motion Total 1 100.0 7.6 Plaintiff 1 100.0 7.6 Sanctions/Attorneys Fees Total 42 33.3 6.6 Defendant 27 14.8 6.3

Plaintiff 14 64.3 7.2

Third Party 1 100.0 7.6 Sever Total 29 34.5 4.4 Defendant 23 21.7 4.6

Plaintiff 6 83.3 3.6 Stay Total 133 49.2 3.5 Defendant 106 48.1 3.7

Plaintiff 26 51.9 2.4

Third Party 1 100.0 8.3 Summary Judgment Total 443 36.6 4.4 Defendant 266 36.5 4.3

Plaintiff 177 36.7 4.5 127 Number Win Rate Pendency Temporary Restraining Total 6 50.0 2.9 Order Motion Plaintiff 6 50.0 2.9 Transfer Motion Total 81 29.0 5.3 Defendant 79 27.8 5.3

Plaintiff 2 75.0 5.4

128 Bifurcation There were 14 Bifurcation contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 64.3%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 2.6. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

Distribution of Decisions by Month For Bifurcation 5

4

3

5

2

3 Number of Decisions 1 2

1 1 1 1

0 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 Month of Litigation from Motion Filing The supporting data is shown below.

Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision 1:09cv00264 Granted in Plaintiff 7.4 1/20/11 part, Denied in Part 1:02cv00156 Denied Defendant 2.6 2/27/03 1:08cv00542 Granted Defendant 1.9 8/26/09 1:08cv00292 Denied Plaintiff 1.4 12/21/09 1:08cv00292 Granted Defendant 2.0 12/21/09 1:06cv00028 Granted Plaintiff 1.1 9/16/08 1:05cv00768 Denied Plaintiff 1.4 11/29/06 1:03cv01035 Granted Defendant 1.1 6/28/06 1:03cv00983 Granted Defendant 0.9 2/22/06 1:02cv00332 Granted in Plaintiff 2.0 11/21/02 part, Denied in Part 1:01cv00882 Denied Defendant 6.2 12/15/03 1:01cv00882 Granted Plaintiff 3.7 8/27/02 1:01cv00504 Granted Defendant 4.1 11/27/02 1:01cv00203 Granted Plaintiff 0.5 7/30/02

129 Consolidate There were 29 Consolidate contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 27.6%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 2.8. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

Distribution of Decisions by Month For Consolidate 12

10

8

6 12

4 Number of Decisions 5 2 4 3 3 1 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 7 13 Month of Litigation from Motion Filing The supporting data is shown below.

Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision 1:02cv01331 Denied Plaintiff 4.4 8/27/04 1:03cv00237 Denied Plaintiff 1.3 6/15/04 1:03cv00526 Denied Plaintiff 6.2 1/29/04 1:03cv01030 Granted Plaintiff 4.8 1/26/05 1:04cv00118 Denied Plaintiff 1.4 6/15/04 1:05cv00147 Granted Plaintiff 1.0 9/14/05 1:06cv00414 Denied Defendant 6.9 3/26/07 1:06cv00495 Denied Defendant 6.9 3/26/07 1:97cv00712 Denied Plaintiff 0.5 2/13/01 1:98cv00080 Denied Defendant 0.9 5/5/04 1:98cv00478 Denied Plaintiff 0.9 5/5/04 1:99cv00570 Denied Plaintiff 0.5 2/13/01 1:99cv00846 Granted Plaintiff 20.0 9/28/01 1:06cv00197 Denied Plaintiff 0.6 5/13/09 1:09cv00072 Denied Plaintiff 0.6 5/13/09 1:09cv00185 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 5/8/09 1:09cv00917 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 1/29/10 1:09cv00841 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 1/29/10 1:10cv00691 Denied Plaintiff 3.8 12/21/10 1:09cv00695 Denied Plaintiff 2.8 6/9/11 1:10cv00428 Denied Defendant 2.9 8/16/11 without Prejudice 1:11cv00165 Denied Defendant 2.8 8/16/11 without 130 Prejudice 1:10cv00658 Denied Plaintiff 1.1 3/12/12 1:11cv00843 Denied Defendant 1.1 3/12/12 1:11cv00165 Denied Defendant 2.8 8/16/11 without Prejudice 1:15cv00026 Denied Defendant 4.3 8/9/16 1:16cv00025 Denied Defendant 1.1 5/31/16 1:15cv00902 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 8/24/16 1:16cv00628 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 8/24/16

131 Contempt There were 2 Contempt contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 50.0%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 7.4. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

Distribution of Decisions by Month For Contempt 2

1.6

1.2

2

0.8 Number of Decisions 0.4

0 8 Month of Litigation from Motion Filing The supporting data is shown below.

Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision 1:95cv00545 Denied Plaintiff 7.6 3/28/02 1:95cv00545 Granted Plaintiff 7.2 7/31/03

132 Default Motion There were 9 Default Motion contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 77.8%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 1.0. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

Distribution of Decisions by Month For Default Motion 7

6

5

4 7 3

2 Number of Decisions

1 1 1 0 1 2 7 Month of Litigation from Motion Filing The supporting data is shown below.

Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision 1:01cv00537 Denied Plaintiff 1.6 12/12/02 1:07cv00787 Granted Plaintiff 0.2 4/21/08 1:07cv00787 Denied Plaintiff 6.4 8/4/10 1:11cv00830 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 9/11/12 1:11cv00830 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 9/11/12 1:12cv01765 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 4/5/13 1:12cv01008 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 8/19/13 1:13cv00246 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 8/5/13 1:13cv00902 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 7/15/13

133 Discovery There were 166 Discovery contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 61.7%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 1.9. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

Distribution of Decisions by Month For Discovery 100

80

60

94 40 Number of Decisions 20 24 23 5 6 0 3 3 4 1 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 12 13 Month of Litigation from Motion Filing The supporting data is shown below.

Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision 1:00cv01002 Denied Defendant 2.6 6/22/01 1:01cv00203 Denied Defendant 0.5 7/30/02 1:01cv00504 Granted Defendant 4.1 11/27/02 1:02cv00162 Granted Plaintiff 0.3 5/30/02 1:02cv00164 Granted Plaintiff 0.3 5/30/02 1:98cv00080 Denied Plaintiff 3.5 2/16/00 1:04cv01258 Granted Defendant 0.7 10/21/05 1:04cv01258 Granted Defendant 0.7 10/21/05 1:04cv01258 Granted Plaintiff 0.6 10/21/05 1:04cv01258 Denied Plaintiff 0.6 10/21/05 1:04cv01258 Granted Defendant 0.5 10/21/05 1:09cv00167 Denied Plaintiff 1.0 5/14/09 1:08cv00292 Denied Defendant 5.4 10/19/10 1:08cv00292 Denied Plaintiff 6.9 7/13/11 1:10cv00128 Denied Plaintiff 0.8 12/16/10 1:11cv00322 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 7/3/12 1:15cv00157 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 10/6/15 1:15cv00525 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 3/14/16 1:15cv00262 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 7/5/16 1:15cv00543 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 6/22/16 1:15cv00634 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 8/11/16 1:15cv00760 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 7/26/16 1:15cv00542 Granted Plaintiff 1.3 9/27/16 1:15cv00543 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 8/19/16 134 1:15cv00544 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 8/19/16 1:15cv00545 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 8/19/16 1:15cv00546 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 8/19/16 1:15cv00547 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 8/19/16 1:15cv00525 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 10/7/16 1:15cv00760 Granted Plaintiff 0.6 11/29/16 1:15cv00546 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 1/30/17 1:15cv00634 Granted Defendant 0.0 3/2/17 1:15cv00634 Granted Plaintiff 0.3 3/2/17 1:15cv01031 Granted Defendant 0.0 2/16/17 1:15cv01031 Granted Plaintiff 0.2 2/8/17 1:15cv01031 Granted Plaintiff 0.3 1/5/17 1:15cv01033 Granted Plaintiff 0.4 2/6/17 1:16cv00666 Granted Defendant 0.3 2/1/17 1:14cv01268 Granted Defendant 0.1 6/2/17 1:15cv00288 Granted Plaintiff 0.2 5/23/17 1:15cv00427 Granted Plaintiff 0.2 5/24/17 1:15cv01031 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 5/30/17 1:16cv00666 Granted Defendant 1.1 5/9/17 1:15cv00218 Granted Defendant 0.7 5/25/17 1:15cv00288 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 3/30/17 1:15cv00542 Granted Defendant 0.0 5/30/17 1:15cv00543 Granted Third Party 0.0 5/30/17 1:15cv00544 Granted Defendant 0.0 5/30/17 1:15cv00545 Granted Defendant 0.0 5/30/17 1:15cv00546 Granted Defendant 0.0 5/30/17 1:15cv00547 Granted Defendant 0.0 5/30/17 1:16cv00275 Granted Defendant 0.0 3/24/17 1:16cv00650 Granted Defendant 0.0 3/20/17 1:99cv00781 Denied Defendant 1.7 6/28/01 1:99cv00781 Denied Plaintiff 1.2 5/24/01 1:01cv00065 Granted Plaintiff 7.0 6/20/02 1:01cv00141 Granted Defendant 2.3 5/17/02 1:01cv00148 Granted Third Party 0.2 1/30/02 1:01cv00193 Granted Defendant 1.2 1/4/02 1:01cv00203 Granted Defendant 0.0 2/7/02 1:01cv00203 Granted Defendant 0.5 4/8/02 1:01cv00401 Granted Defendant 3.0 6/20/02 1:01cv00493 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 12/17/01 1:01cv00537 Granted Defendant 1.0 12/12/02 1:01cv00882 Denied Defendant 1.7 8/1/03 1:02cv00156 Granted Third Party 6.3 2/9/04 1:02cv00471 Denied Defendant 0.6 1/22/03 without Prejudice 1:02cv01250 Denied Defendant 0.0 12/18/03 1:03cv00402 Denied Plaintiff 0.9 5/5/04

1:03cv00477 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 2/12/04 135 1:03cv00526 Denied Defendant 0.0 6/9/04 1:03cv00527 Denied Defendant 0.0 6/9/04 1:03cv00528 Denied Defendant 0.0 6/9/04 1:03cv00530 Denied Defendant 0.0 6/9/04 1:03cv00530 Denied Defendant 0.7 7/27/04 1:03cv00848 Granted in Defendant 2.5 7/8/04 part, Denied in Part 1:03cv00983 Granted in Plaintiff 1.2 5/20/05 part, Denied in Part 1:03cv00983 Granted in Plaintiff 0.5 5/20/05 part, Denied in Part 1:03cv01030 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 5/26/04 1:03cv01030 Granted in Plaintiff 1.2 3/11/05 part, Denied in Part 1:04cv00034 Denied Plaintiff 0.9 5/5/04 1:04cv00305 Granted Plaintiff 0.3 6/29/05 1:04cv01258 Granted Third Party 1.3 7/6/05 1:05cv00528 Denied Defendant 1.8 9/14/05 1:96cv00101 Granted Defendant 7.6 1/8/02 1:98cv00080 Denied Defendant 40.1 1/13/04 1:98cv00478 Denied Plaintiff 0.9 5/5/04 1:98cv00478 Granted Plaintiff 1.8 8/26/04 1:05cv00645 Granted Plaintiff 0.2 9/13/06 1:05cv00595 Granted Defendant 0.2 2/22/06 1:03cv00983 Granted Defendant 0.3 3/13/06 1:06cv00358 Granted Plaintiff 0.5 3/9/07 1:06cv00105 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 3/23/07 1:06cv00239 Granted in Plaintiff 0.7 7/19/07 part, Denied in Part 1:06cv00239 Granted Unknown 0.0 8/23/07 1:07cv00787 Granted Defendant 0.1 7/21/08 1:06cv00414 Granted Plaintiff 1.4 11/17/08 1:10cv00050 Granted Defendant 3.5 12/15/10 1:08cv00568 Denied Plaintiff 2.3 6/20/12 1:10cv00658 Denied Defendant 2.1 1/8/13 1:11cv00843 Denied Plaintiff 2.1 1/8/13 1:12cv00703 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 12/13/12 1:11cv00309 Denied Plaintiff 2.6 12/14/12 1:13cv00474 Granted Plaintiff 3.8 5/23/16 1:08cv00568 Granted Third Party 0.9 6/8/16 1:15cv00218 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 7/14/16 1:15cv01077 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 6/24/16 1:14cv01483 Denied Plaintiff 5.5 3/28/17 136 1:15cv00262 Granted Defendant 0.1 9/13/16 1:15cv00654 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 11/16/16 1:16cv00275 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 1/10/17 1:16cv00666 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 2/7/17 1:00cv00796 Denied Third Party 7.9 3/25/02 1:01cv00801 Granted Plaintiff 6.0 5/2/03 1:03cv00477 Granted Plaintiff 0.5 9/14/04 1:04cv01264 Granted in Defendant 1.6 1/10/06 part, Denied in Part 1:11cv01254 Denied Plaintiff 2.6 4/29/13 1:13cv00473 Denied Third Party 1.7 9/9/14 1:00cv00143 Granted in Defendant 2.0 5/23/01 part, Denied in Part 1:00cv00143 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 3/27/01 1:00cv00751 Denied Plaintiff 0.2 1/29/03 1:00cv00796 Denied Plaintiff 12.3 3/25/02 1:00cv00796 Denied Plaintiff 12.3 3/25/02 1:00cv00796 Denied Plaintiff 11.9 3/25/02 1:00cv00796 Denied Plaintiff 6.9 3/25/02 1:01cv00065 Granted Defendant 7.6 6/20/02 1:01cv00077 Granted in Plaintiff 4.6 2/13/03 part, Denied in Part 1:01cv00141 Granted Defendant 2.2 5/17/02 1:01cv00141 Denied Plaintiff 1.3 5/17/02 1:01cv00148 Granted in Plaintiff 2.0 6/20/02 part, Denied in Part 1:01cv00148 Granted Plaintiff 1.6 6/20/02 1:01cv00148 Granted Defendant 1.4 6/20/02 1:01cv00148 Denied Defendant 3.2 8/13/02 1:01cv00168 Granted in Defendant 1.6 8/16/02 part, Denied in Part 1:01cv00203 Denied Plaintiff 1.0 11/9/01 1:01cv00203 Granted Defendant 0.4 11/9/01 1:01cv00504 Denied Defendant 4.7 4/14/03 1:01cv00801 Denied Defendant 6.5 5/2/03 1:02cv00156 Denied Defendant 5.9 2/9/04 1:02cv01331 Granted in Defendant 2.0 4/21/04 part, Denied in Part 1:02cv01331 Denied Plaintiff 0.8 4/21/04 1:03cv00115 Granted Defendant 1.8 2/3/04 1:03cv00477 Denied Defendant 2.1 3/11/05 1:03cv00848 Denied Plaintiff 2.8 4/21/04 137 1:03cv01138 Granted in Defendant 2.2 8/4/04 part, Denied in Part 1:05cv00355 Denied Plaintiff 0.5 6/17/05 1:05cv00355 Denied Plaintiff 0.5 6/17/05 1:05cv00528 Denied Plaintiff 1.3 8/31/05 1:99cv00904 Granted in Defendant 2.9 6/8/01 part, Denied in Part 1:99cv00904 Denied Plaintiff 0.7 8/6/01 1:04cv01258 Denied Defendant 0.3 10/21/05 1:03cv01158 Granted Defendant 7.1 8/17/06 1:04cv01414 Granted in Plaintiff 1.8 3/16/06 part, Denied in Part 1:01cv00065 Denied Defendant 2.5 6/20/02 1:99cv00904 Granted in Defendant 2.9 6/8/01 part, Denied in Part 1:99cv00904 Denied Plaintiff 0.7 8/6/01 1:08cv00568 Granted Plaintiff 2.1 1/7/11 1:10cv00128 Denied Plaintiff 0.8 12/16/10 1:11cv00313 Denied Plaintiff 2.3 12/14/12 1:11cv00309 Denied Plaintiff 1.1 12/14/12 1:11cv00309 Denied Plaintiff 1.7 12/14/12 1:11cv01254 Granted Plaintiff 2.4 4/29/13 1:14cv01317 Granted Plaintiff 0.8 11/23/15 1:15cv00634 Granted Defendant 1.6 11/30/16 1:12cv00487 Granted Plaintiff 2.5 7/26/17 1:12cv00487 Granted Defendant 3.4 8/9/17

138 Dismissal There were 270 Dismissal contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 43.3%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 6.0. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

Distribution of Decisions by Month For Dismissal 40

35

30

25

20 39 34 15 31 28 25 26 23 Number of Decisions 10 15 12 12 13 5 7 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Month of Litigation from Motion Filing The supporting data is shown below.

Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision 1:00cv00457 Denied Defendant 5.0 2/28/01 1:00cv00629 Granted Defendant 7.9 9/27/01 1:00cv00886 Denied Plaintiff 8.2 9/25/01 1:00cv01002 Granted Defendant 4.1 6/22/01 1:00cv01013 Denied Defendant 3.6 5/16/01 1:00cv01013 Granted in Plaintiff 9.7 9/30/02 part, Denied in Part 1:00cv01013 Granted Defendant 9.4 9/30/02 1:00cv01069 Denied Defendant 3.4 5/23/01 1:01cv00070 Granted Defendant 1.3 5/29/01 1:01cv00070 Denied Defendant 1.1 5/29/01 1:01cv00077 Granted Plaintiff 8.0 6/11/02 1:01cv00148 Denied Defendant 6.7 10/17/01 1:01cv00148 Granted Plaintiff 6.0 10/17/01 1:01cv00266 Granted Defendant 6.3 11/28/01 1:01cv00387 Granted Plaintiff 3.3 7/31/02 1:01cv00401 Granted Defendant 2.4 2/15/02 1:01cv00401 Granted in Defendant 5.1 6/20/02 part, Denied in Part 1:01cv00416 Granted Defendant 6.8 2/8/02 1:01cv00537 Granted Plaintiff 7.0 6/10/02 1:01cv00537 Denied Plaintiff 1.6 12/12/02 139 1:01cv00801 Granted in Plaintiff 4.8 6/25/02 part, Denied in Part 1:01cv00801 Denied Plaintiff 5.6 1/29/03 1:01cv00801 Granted Plaintiff 5.0 1/29/03 1:02cv00467 Denied Plaintiff 5.2 1/27/03 1:02cv00471 Denied Plaintiff 5.1 1/22/03 1:02cv01331 Denied Plaintiff 1.6 11/22/04 1:02cv01427 Denied Defendant 3.5 3/4/04 1:02cv01427 Denied Defendant 3.5 3/4/04 without Prejudice 1:03cv00364 Denied Defendant 1.8 8/4/03 1:03cv00477 Granted in Plaintiff 3.6 9/14/04 part, Denied in Part 1:03cv00526 Granted Defendant 6.8 2/24/04 1:03cv00527 Granted Defendant 6.8 2/24/04 1:03cv00530 Granted Defendant 1.7 5/5/04 1:03cv00983 Denied Defendant 5.2 5/24/04 1:03cv00990 Granted Defendant 5.7 6/28/04 1:03cv00990 Granted Defendant 2.9 6/28/04 1:03cv01067 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 2/24/04 1:04cv00067 Denied Plaintiff 5.1 10/26/04 without Prejudice 1:04cv00269 Denied Defendant 10.0 3/18/05 without Prejudice 1:04cv00305 Granted in Defendant 10.7 8/7/06 part, Denied in Part 1:04cv00305 Granted Defendant 8.5 8/7/06 1:04cv00818 Denied Defendant 6.3 2/15/05 without Prejudice 1:04cv00852 Denied Defendant 5.3 3/31/05 1:04cv01199 Denied Defendant 5.9 4/13/05 without Prejudice 1:04cv01231 Denied Plaintiff 5.1 4/13/05 1:04cv01258 Denied Plaintiff 4.9 4/20/05 without Prejudice 1:04cv01293 Denied Defendant 4.1 2/15/05 without Prejudice 1:04cv01343 Granted Defendant 7.5 8/3/05 1:04cv01414 Denied Defendant 1.8 1/14/05 1:04cv01451 Denied Defendant 1.7 2/18/05 without Prejudice 1:04cv01507 Denied Defendant 12.6 10/19/06 140 1:05cv00239 Denied Defendant 9.1 3/27/06 without Prejudice 1:05cv00336 Granted in Defendant 7.7 3/31/06 part, Denied in Part 1:05cv00337 Granted in Defendant 7.7 3/31/06 part, Denied in Part 1:95cv00709 Granted Defendant 1.0 1/15/03 1:97cv00550 Granted Plaintiff 7.7 3/22/00 1:98cv00424 Denied Defendant 4.4 2/24/00 1:98cv00478 Denied Plaintiff 7.1 3/30/01 1:98cv00478 Denied Defendant 1.8 4/5/04 without Prejudice 1:99cv00274 Denied Plaintiff 8.0 9/29/00 1:99cv00274 Granted Plaintiff 4.7 7/8/03 1:99cv00301 Granted in Defendant 2.6 12/13/00 part, Denied in Part 1:04cv01507 Denied Defendant 10.4 10/19/06 1:06cv00383 Denied Defendant 6.7 3/7/07 without Prejudice 1:04cv00884 Granted Plaintiff 2.6 1/19/07 1:05cv00725 Denied Defendant 22.3 9/30/08 1:07cv00137 Denied Defendant 3.9 8/2/07 1:05cv00645 Granted Defendant 2.2 9/10/07 1:07cv00333 Denied Defendant 6.3 1/25/08 1:06cv00613 Granted Defendant 2.9 11/28/07 1:06cv00028 Denied Defendant 13.1 11/5/08 without Prejudice 1:07cv00190 Granted Defendant 3.0 3/7/08 1:07cv00552 Denied Plaintiff 3.1 3/7/08 without Prejudice 1:07cv00650 Granted Defendant 14.7 3/11/09 1:07cv00779 Granted Defendant 1.2 2/27/08 1:07cv00780 Granted Defendant 3.8 5/12/08 1:07cv00826 Granted Defendant 8.0 10/8/08 1:08cv00016 Denied Defendant 0.4 2/27/08 1:07cv00589 Granted Defendant 7.8 11/5/08 1:07cv00826 Granted Plaintiff 6.5 10/8/08 1:08cv00330 Denied Defendant 8.6 4/3/09 1:08cv00330 Denied Defendant 8.6 4/3/09 1:06cv00091 Granted Defendant 3.0 11/10/08 1:07cv00823 Denied Plaintiff 6.3 11/21/08 1:07cv00840 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 6/3/08 1:08cv00166 Granted Defendant 6.7 12/17/08 141 1:08cv00290 Denied Defendant 6.2 2/18/09 1:08cv00292 Denied Defendant 7.4 2/20/09 1:08cv00334 Denied Defendant 1.9 9/26/08 1:08cv00542 Granted Defendant 3.1 7/10/09 1:08cv00489 Granted Defendant 5.8 8/24/09 1:06cv00495 Denied Defendant 6.3 5/29/09 1:06cv00495 Denied Defendant 4.1 5/29/09 1:08cv00635 Granted in Plaintiff 5.7 5/19/09 part, Denied in Part 1:08cv00823 Denied Defendant 4.6 6/17/09 1:06cv00028 Denied Defendant 11.5 5/18/10 1:06cv00495 Denied Defendant 4.1 11/3/09 1:08cv00290 Granted Defendant 5.2 2/24/10 1:09cv00022 Denied Defendant 10.6 3/31/10 without Prejudice 1:09cv00072 Denied Plaintiff 1.8 10/16/09 1:09cv00234 Granted Defendant 6.8 2/24/10 1:01cv00155 Granted Defendant 0.0 6/18/01 1:08cv00823 Granted Defendant 9.5 9/30/10 1:09cv00628 Granted in Defendant 7.9 8/12/10 part, Denied in Part 1:09cv00628 Granted in Defendant 7.8 8/12/10 part, Denied in Part 1:09cv00628 Granted in Defendant 7.8 8/12/10 part, Denied in Part 1:09cv00694 Denied Plaintiff 5.7 9/30/10 1:09cv00264 Denied Plaintiff 5.9 11/22/10 1:10cv00001 Granted Defendant 5.1 8/25/10 1:10cv00001 Granted Defendant 6.0 8/25/10 1:09cv00234 Denied Defendant 7.5 11/9/10 1:09cv00860 Granted Defendant 6.8 8/25/10 1:10cv00666 Granted Defendant 3.7 3/16/11 1:10cv00666 Granted Defendant 3.1 3/16/11 1:10cv00666 Granted Defendant 3.1 3/16/11 1:10cv00666 Granted Defendant 2.8 3/16/11 1:10cv00666 Granted Defendant 2.5 3/16/11 1:10cv00666 Granted Defendant 2.4 3/16/11 1:10cv00666 Granted Defendant 2.4 3/16/11 1:10cv00666 Granted Defendant 2.2 3/16/11 1:10cv00666 Granted Defendant 2.0 3/16/11 1:10cv00690 Denied Defendant 6.7 6/28/11 1:10cv00812 Granted in Defendant 5.7 7/12/11 part, Denied in Part 142 1:10cv00812 Granted in Defendant 5.1 7/12/11 part, Denied in Part 1:10cv00841 Denied Defendant 3.1 3/10/11 1:10cv01028 Denied Defendant 8.4 9/30/11 1:10cv01028 Denied Defendant 6.1 9/30/11 1:10cv01028 Denied Defendant 4.6 9/30/11 1:10cv01028 Denied Defendant 4.6 9/30/11 1:10cv01028 Denied Defendant 4.6 9/30/11 1:11cv00107 Granted Plaintiff 3.3 7/28/11 1:11cv00165 Denied Defendant 2.2 8/16/11 without Prejudice 1:10cv00690 Granted in Plaintiff 10.3 9/6/12 part, Denied in Part 1:10cv00999 Denied Defendant 7.5 3/29/12 1:11cv00084 Denied Defendant 12.9 8/2/12 1:11cv00313 Denied Defendant 7.7 4/4/12 1:11cv00440 Denied Defendant 8.2 4/4/12 1:11cv00615 Denied Defendant 8.5 5/17/12 1:11cv00623 Granted Defendant 11.9 8/28/12 1:11cv00690 Denied Defendant 6.8 4/25/12 without Prejudice 1:11cv00821 Denied Defendant 4.2 3/1/12 1:11cv00773 Granted Defendant 12.0 10/23/12 1:11cv00773 Granted Defendant 9.4 10/23/12 1:11cv00827 Granted in Defendant 4.3 4/30/12 part, Denied in Part 1:11cv00828 Denied Defendant 4.3 4/30/12 1:11cv00829 Granted in Defendant 4.3 4/30/12 part, Denied in Part 1:11cv00829 Denied Defendant 4.3 4/30/12 1:11cv00831 Granted in Defendant 4.3 4/30/12 part, Denied in Part 1:11cv00833 Granted in Defendant 4.3 4/30/12 part, Denied in Part 1:11cv00835 Granted in Defendant 4.3 4/30/12 part, Denied in Part 1:11cv01152 Granted Defendant 8.8 9/6/12 1:11cv01171 Granted Defendant 8.3 9/17/12 1:11cv00830 Denied Defendant 4.3 4/30/12

143 1:11cv00834 Granted in Defendant 3.1 4/30/12 part, Denied in Part 1:11cv00967 Granted in Defendant 8.3 9/28/12 part, Denied in Part 1:10cv00999 Granted in Defendant 9.4 3/14/13 part, Denied in Part 1:12cv00614 Granted Defendant 9.5 3/27/13 1:10cv00258 Denied Defendant 5.5 8/16/12 1:11cv00054 Denied Plaintiff 5.0 6/21/12 1:11cv00829 Denied Defendant 4.3 4/30/12 1:12cv00159 Granted in Plaintiff 9.0 2/6/13 part, Denied in Part 1:10cv00841 Granted Plaintiff 1.6 9/13/12 1:11cv01025 Granted Defendant 12.9 4/1/13 1:11cv01025 Granted Defendant 12.9 4/1/13 1:12cv00613 Denied Defendant 9.6 3/27/13 1:11cv00313 Granted Defendant 6.6 6/19/13 1:12cv00931 Denied Defendant 7.7 5/16/13 1:12cv01138 Denied Plaintiff 5.5 6/13/13 1:12cv01281 Denied Defendant 3.7 4/29/13 1:12cv01302 Granted Defendant 7.1 6/5/13 1:12cv01302 Granted Defendant 5.8 6/5/13 1:11cv00690 Granted Plaintiff 3.9 8/15/13 1:12cv00140 Granted Defendant 4.3 6/19/13 1:12cv00142 Granted Defendant 4.3 6/19/13 1:12cv00660 Denied Defendant 4.3 6/26/13 without Prejudice 1:12cv01277 Denied Defendant 5.2 8/6/13 1:12cv01491 Denied Defendant 6.2 8/6/13 1:12cv01491 Denied Defendant 5.9 8/6/13 1:12cv01724 Granted Defendant 4.6 7/8/13 1:12cv00141 Granted Defendant 4.3 6/19/13 1:10cv00658 Granted Defendant 2.3 7/22/13 1:11cv00313 Granted Defendant 3.4 10/25/13 1:11cv00843 Granted Plaintiff 2.3 7/22/13 1:12cv00140 Denied Defendant 3.2 10/16/13 without Prejudice 1:12cv01141 Granted in Defendant 4.4 1/17/14 part, Denied in Part 1:12cv01265 Granted Third Party 2.6 5/9/13 1:12cv01301 Granted Defendant 7.4 1/28/14

144 1:13cv00453 Granted in Defendant 14.8 9/3/14 part, Denied in Part 1:13cv00474 Granted in Defendant 14.9 9/12/14 part, Denied in Part 1:13cv00597 Granted Plaintiff 0.2 8/8/13 1:13cv00616 Denied Defendant 10.1 4/8/14 1:13cv00624 Denied Defendant 10.1 4/8/14 1:13cv01052 Denied Defendant 8.1 4/8/14 1:13cv01452 Denied Defendant 5.2 4/8/14 1:12cv01301 Denied Defendant 5.8 5/2/13 1:12cv00142 Granted Defendant 3.4 10/25/13 1:12cv00301 Denied Plaintiff 0.9 12/16/13 1:12cv00448 Denied Plaintiff 0.9 12/16/13 1:13cv01274 Granted in Defendant 12.5 12/18/14 part, Denied in Part 1:13cv01450 Denied Defendant 5.0 4/8/14 1:13cv02014 Granted Defendant 7.6 9/23/14 1:14cv00033 Denied Defendant 2.2 4/8/14 1:13cv00625 Denied Defendant 3.6 4/8/14 1:13cv02012 Granted in Defendant 8.0 11/5/14 part, Denied in Part 1:14cv00036 Denied Defendant 1.1 4/8/14 1:14cv00034 Denied Defendant 0.5 4/8/14 1:13cv02020 Denied Plaintiff 2.9 10/10/14 without Prejudice 1:14cv00393 Granted Defendant 7.8 3/31/15 1:14cv00559 Granted in Defendant 7.9 3/10/15 part, Denied in Part 1:14cv00578 Granted Defendant 7.7 3/31/15 1:14cv00579 Granted Defendant 7.8 3/30/15 1:14cv00617 Granted Defendant 7.5 3/30/15 1:14cv00779 Granted Defendant 7.6 3/30/15 1:14cv00874 Granted Defendant 11.7 7/22/15 1:14cv00894 Denied Defendant 8.5 6/5/15 without Prejudice 1:14cv00895 Denied Defendant 8.5 6/5/15 without Prejudice 1:14cv00896 Denied Defendant 8.5 6/5/15 without Prejudice 1:14cv00897 Denied Defendant 8.5 6/5/15 without Prejudice 145 1:14cv00899 Denied Defendant 8.5 6/5/15 without Prejudice 1:14cv00901 Denied Defendant 8.5 6/5/15 without Prejudice 1:14cv00902 Denied Defendant 8.5 6/5/15 without Prejudice 1:14cv00903 Denied Defendant 8.5 6/5/15 without Prejudice 1:14cv01081 Denied Defendant 7.1 4/16/15 1:13cv02049 Denied Plaintiff 7.5 3/12/15 1:14cv01081 Denied Defendant 4.9 4/16/15 1:14cv01189 Granted Defendant 4.7 3/30/15 1:13cv00619 Denied Defendant 0.7 10/28/14 1:13cv02012 Denied Defendant 12.7 1/28/16 1:13cv02012 Granted in Plaintiff 11.0 1/28/16 part, Denied in Part 1:14cv01427 Granted Defendant 8.4 10/8/15 1:14cv01428 Granted Defendant 8.4 10/8/15 1:14cv01429 Granted Defendant 8.4 10/8/15 1:13cv01893 Denied Plaintiff 0.5 4/16/15 1:14cv01482 Granted Plaintiff 3.7 7/22/15 1:14cv01483 Denied Plaintiff 3.7 7/22/15 1:15cv00026 Denied Defendant 14.6 6/15/16 without Prejudice 1:15cv00260 Denied Defendant 4.0 8/6/15 1:14cv00903 Denied Defendant 7.7 3/22/16 1:14cv00904 Denied Defendant 7.7 3/22/16 1:14cv01295 Denied Defendant 0.7 5/27/15 1:15cv00218 Denied Defendant 7.4 1/12/16 1:15cv00248 Denied Defendant 7.4 3/3/16 1:15cv00262 Denied Defendant 9.2 3/22/16 1:15cv00288 Denied Defendant 10.1 3/28/16 without Prejudice 1:15cv00431 Granted Defendant 7.1 2/19/16 1:15cv00432 Granted Defendant 7.1 2/19/16 1:15cv00486 Denied Defendant 2.4 9/10/15 1:10cv00050 Denied Plaintiff 3.0 12/4/15 1:13cv00453 Denied Plaintiff 5.6 4/7/16 1:14cv01268 Granted Defendant 7.6 5/18/16 1:15cv00427 Denied Defendant 7.5 3/22/16 1:15cv00545 Granted Defendant 6.5 4/6/16 1:15cv00647 Granted Plaintiff 8.3 7/25/16 1:15cv00654 Granted in Defendant 9.6 8/11/16 part, Denied in Part 146 1:15cv00661 Denied Defendant 5.0 2/4/16 without Prejudice 1:15cv00762 Granted Defendant 6.6 5/17/16 1:15cv00808 Denied Defendant 4.7 4/25/16 1:13cv00685 Denied Defendant 3.0 4/19/16 1:15cv00634 Denied Defendant 9.6 9/29/16 1:15cv00760 Denied Defendant 7.6 9/29/16 1:15cv00960 Denied Defendant 6.1 8/12/16 1:15cv00355 Granted in Defendant 1.1 3/22/16 part, Denied in Part 1:15cv00661 Granted Defendant 6.4 12/14/16 1:15cv00760 Denied Defendant 5.5 9/29/16 1:15cv01034 Granted Defendant 6.8 10/31/16 1:16cv00208 Denied Defendant 13.1 7/11/17 1:15cv00288 Denied Defendant 7.5 3/1/17 1:15cv00634 Granted Plaintiff 6.9 3/20/17 1:16cv00197 Granted in Defendant 7.9 2/14/17 part, Denied in Part 1:16cv01240 Denied Defendant 3.0 5/15/17

147 Exceptional Case There were 13 Exceptional Case contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 15.4%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 8.2. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

Distribution of Decisions by Month For Exceptional Case 5

4

3

5

2 Number of Decisions 1 2 2

1 1 1 1

0 3 5 6 8 10 12 13 Month of Litigation from Motion Filing The supporting data is shown below.

Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision 1:02cv01250 Denied Defendant 16.2 8/11/06 1:08cv00568 Denied Defendant 3.0 5/3/12 without Prejudice 1:08cv00568 Denied Defendant 3.0 5/3/12 without Prejudice 1:09md02118 Granted Defendant 7.6 1/12/12 1:10cv00315 Denied Plaintiff 9.6 3/13/12 1:11cv00440 Denied Defendant 11.5 3/31/16 1:11cv01007 Denied Plaintiff 7.6 3/31/14 without Prejudice 1:11cv01007 Denied Plaintiff 7.6 3/31/14 without Prejudice 1:11cv01007 Denied Defendant 7.6 3/31/14 without Prejudice 1:12cv00451 Denied Defendant 7.4 3/31/15 1:12cv01138 Granted Defendant 14.8 3/31/16 1:12cv00282 Denied Defendant 4.9 10/30/14 without Prejudice 1:12cv00614 Denied Defendant 5.7 7/11/17

148 Expert/Daubert

There were 172 Expert/Daubert contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 43.0%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision (or in the case of Markman rulings, from case filing to decision) was 2.2. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

Distribution of Decisions by Month For Expert/Daubert 70

60

50

40

64 30

20 Number of Decisions 32 10 22 22 20 7 0 2 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 13 Month of Litigation from Motion Filing

The supporting data is shown below. The table below identifies motion subjects ("What") and grounds ("Why") and includes the designation GIP for those subjects and grounds which were granted in part and denied in part.

Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date What Why 1:99cv00274 Granted Defendant 1.6 9/26/03 1:99cv00274 Granted Plaintiff 0.5 7/24/03 1:99cv00781 Denied Defendant 0.7 11/9/01 1:99cv00274 Granted Plaintiff 0.5 7/24/03 1:00cv00751 Granted Defendant 0.6 1/24/03 1:01cv00065 Granted Defendant 0.5 2/5/03 1:01cv00203 Denied Defendant 0.5 7/30/02 1:01cv00203 Denied Plaintiff 0.5 7/30/02 1:01cv00504 Denied Defendant 0.9 4/14/03 1:01cv00504 Granted Plaintiff 0.4 4/14/03 1:01cv00504 Granted Defendant 0.4 4/14/03 1:01cv00537 Granted Defendant 2.4 3/21/03 1:01cv00537 Denied Defendant 0.4 3/21/03 1:01cv00537 Denied Defendant 0.4 3/21/03 1:01cv00537 Denied Plaintiff 0.4 3/21/03 1:01cv00537 Denied Plaintiff 0.4 3/21/03 1:01cv00537 Denied Plaintiff 0.4 3/21/03 1:01cv00801 Granted Plaintiff 0.5 7/30/03 1:01cv00801 Granted Defendant 0.5 7/30/03 1:02cv00235 Granted Plaintiff 0.5 6/17/03 1:02cv00332 Granted Plaintiff 0.5 6/17/03 149 1:02cv00366 Granted Defendant 4.6 2/12/03 1:02cv01250 Granted Defendant 2.0 12/18/03 1:02cv01250 Denied Plaintiff 0.5 12/18/03 1:02cv01250 Granted Defendant 0.5 12/18/03 1:02cv01250 Granted in Plaintiff 0.2 1/12/04 part, Denied in Part 1:02cv01331 Granted Plaintiff 3.9 9/8/04 1:02cv01331 Denied Defendant 3.6 9/27/04 1:02cv01331 Denied Plaintiff 0.6 11/19/04 1:02cv01331 Denied Plaintiff 0.6 11/19/04 1:03cv00115 Denied Defendant 4.9 10/7/04 1:03cv00283 Denied Plaintiff 1.1 9/29/05 1:03cv00477 Denied Defendant 12.4 9/27/06 1:03cv00477 Denied Defendant 12.4 9/27/06 1:03cv00848 Granted Plaintiff 0.4 10/6/04 1:04cv01507 Granted Defendant 3.9 10/19/06 1:04cv01507 Granted Plaintiff 3.9 10/19/06 1:04cv01507 Denied Plaintiff 3.9 10/19/06 1:03cv01158 Granted Plaintiff 5.4 11/8/05 1:03cv01158 Granted Plaintiff 3.0 11/8/05 1:04cv00034 Granted Defendant 1.4 8/26/04 1:04cv00034 Granted Defendant 1.1 1/5/05 1:04cv00858 Granted Plaintiff 6.2 3/28/06 1:04cv00858 Granted Plaintiff 5.7 3/28/06 1:04cv00858 Denied Plaintiff 5.0 3/28/06 1:04cv00858 Denied Plaintiff 5.0 3/28/06 1:04cv00858 Denied Plaintiff 5.0 3/28/06 1:04cv00858 Denied Plaintiff 5.0 3/28/06 1:04cv01507 Denied Defendant 3.9 10/19/06 1:04cv01507 Denied Plaintiff 3.9 10/19/06 1:97cv00550 Denied Defendant 5.8 10/12/00 1:97cv00700 Denied Plaintiff 4.2 10/12/00 1:98cv00080 Granted Plaintiff 1.5 8/26/04 1:98cv00080 Granted Plaintiff 1.1 1/5/05 1:98cv00424 Granted Defendant 0.5 2/24/00 1:98cv00424 Granted in Defendant 0.5 2/24/00 part, Denied in Part 1:98cv00478 Granted Defendant 1.4 8/26/04 1:98cv00478 Granted Defendant 1.4 8/26/04 1:98cv00478 Denied Plaintiff 1.1 1/5/05 1:98cv00478 Granted Defendant 1.1 1/5/05 1:98cv00750 Denied Defendant 0.2 2/7/00 1:98cv00750 Denied Defendant 0.2 2/7/00 1:98cv00750 Denied Defendant 0.9 9/12/02 1:99cv00274 Granted Plaintiff 2.5 7/8/03

150 1:99cv00301 Granted in Defendant 0.8 12/22/00 part, Denied in Part 1:99cv00904 Denied Defendant 0.6 8/6/01 1:04cv01258 Denied Defendant 3.5 4/5/06 1:04cv01258 Granted in Defendant 3.5 4/5/06 part, Denied in Part 1:04cv01258 Denied Plaintiff 3.5 4/5/06 1:04cv01258 Granted Defendant 0.0 4/13/06 1:04cv01258 Granted Defendant 0.1 4/13/06 1:04cv01507 Denied Plaintiff 3.9 10/19/06 1:04cv00305 Denied Defendant 0.9 11/8/06 without Prejudice 1:04cv00305 Denied Plaintiff 0.9 11/8/06 without Prejudice 1:04cv00305 Denied Plaintiff 0.9 11/8/06 without Prejudice 1:05cv00552 Denied Plaintiff 2.2 1/10/07 1:96cv00589 Denied Defendant 1.1 8/29/01 1:05cv00747 Granted Defendant 3.2 8/23/07 1:06cv00091 Granted in Defendant 2.3 11/20/07 part, Denied in Part 1:06cv00091 Granted Plaintiff 2.3 11/20/07 1:06cv00414 Denied Plaintiff 4.1 12/4/08 1:06cv00414 Denied Plaintiff 4.1 12/4/08 1:07cv00457 Granted Defendant 0.6 3/4/09 1:00cv00751 Granted Defendant 0.5 1/21/03 1:01cv00077 Denied Defendant 0.6 4/16/03 1:01cv00077 Denied Defendant 0.6 4/16/03 1:01cv00148 Granted in Defendant 0.5 11/20/02 part, Denied in Part 1:02cv01250 Denied Defendant 0.4 12/18/03 1:03cv00848 Denied Plaintiff 0.4 10/6/04 without Prejudice 1:04cv00034 Denied Plaintiff 1.1 1/5/05 1:96cv00589 Granted Defendant 0.6 8/14/01 1:97cv00550 Granted Defendant 1.0 2/23/05 1:97cv00712 Granted in Plaintiff 0.7 3/8/01 part, Denied in Part 1:98cv00080 Granted Defendant 1.1 1/5/05 1:98cv00080 Denied Defendant 1.1 1/5/05 1:98cv00424 Denied Plaintiff 0.5 2/24/00 151 1:98cv00478 Denied Plaintiff 1.1 1/5/05 1:98cv00478 Denied Plaintiff 1.1 1/5/05 1:98cv00478 Granted Plaintiff 1.1 1/5/05 1:98cv00478 Granted Plaintiff 1.1 1/5/05 1:98cv00478 Granted Plaintiff 1.1 1/5/05 1:98cv00478 Granted Plaintiff 1.1 1/5/05 1:98cv00478 Granted Plaintiff 1.1 1/5/05 1:98cv00478 Granted Plaintiff 1.1 1/5/05 1:99cv00274 Granted Plaintiff 2.6 9/26/03 1:99cv00274 Granted Plaintiff 2.6 9/26/03 1:99cv00301 Denied Defendant 0.8 12/22/00 1:99cv00781 Granted in Defendant 0.7 11/9/01 part, Denied in Part 1:99cv00781 Denied Defendant 0.7 11/9/01 1:07cv00333 Denied Plaintiff 4.1 1/20/10 1:07cv00409 Denied Plaintiff 4.1 1/20/10 1:08cv00112 Denied Plaintiff 2.2 9/23/09 1:08cv00112 Denied Defendant 1.1 1/26/10 1:09cv00264 Denied Plaintiff 4.6 1/20/11 1:09cv00724 Denied Defendant 7.8 3/24/11 1:06cv00028 Denied Plaintiff 0.2 3/18/11 without Prejudice 1:10cv00315 Denied Defendant 2.8 4/13/11 1:10cv00315 Granted Plaintiff 2.8 4/13/11 1:09cv00515 Granted in Plaintiff 4.4 10/3/11 part, Denied in Part 1:04cv01199 Granted in Defendant 0.8 10/31/11 part, Denied in Part 1:04cv01199 Granted in Plaintiff 0.8 10/31/11 part, Denied in Part 1:06cv00557 Granted in Plaintiff 0.7 9/8/11 part, Denied in Part 1:09cv00627 Granted Plaintiff 2.5 11/4/11 1:09cv00627 Granted Plaintiff 5.2 1/24/12 1:10cv00269 Denied Defendant 1.4 4/20/12 1:10cv00269 Denied Defendant 1.4 4/20/12 1:10cv00269 Granted Plaintiff 0.3 4/20/12 1:09cv00627 Denied Defendant 5.2 1/24/12 1:10cv00735 Denied Defendant 2.3 8/28/12 1:10cv00258 Denied Defendant 4.6 11/8/12 1:10cv00841 Granted in Defendant 1.6 9/13/12 part, Denied in Part 152 1:10cv00841 Granted Defendant 1.6 9/13/12 1:10cv00841 Denied Defendant 1.6 9/13/12 1:10cv00428 Denied Defendant 3.6 4/9/13 1:11cv00054 Denied Plaintiff 0.0 10/10/12 1:11cv00054 Denied Plaintiff 2.7 3/19/13 1:10cv00428 Granted Plaintiff 2.4 4/9/13 1:10cv00428 Granted in Defendant 2.4 4/9/13 part, Denied in Part 1:10cv00428 Denied Plaintiff 2.4 4/9/13 1:11cv00173 Denied Plaintiff 2.2 4/9/13 1:13cv00576 Denied Defendant 3.3 7/26/13 1:11cv01007 Granted in Plaintiff 3.1 6/25/13 part, Denied in Part 1:11cv01007 Denied Defendant 2.8 6/25/13 1:11cv01007 Granted Defendant 3.6 6/25/13 1:10cv00503 Granted Plaintiff 3.5 9/9/13 Invalidity 1:10cv00503 Denied Defendant 1.7 9/9/13 1:10cv00658 Granted in Defendant 5.7 1/13/14 Infringement part, Denied in Part 1:11cv01254 Granted Defendant 1.8 11/20/13 1:11cv01254 Denied Plaintiff 1.1 11/20/13 1:11cv01254 Granted in Defendant 0.9 11/20/13 part, Denied in Part 1:10cv00999 Denied Defendant 5.5 9/30/13 1:11cv00615 Granted in Defendant 6.6 7/22/14 part, Denied in Part 1:11cv00792 Denied Defendant 3.1 4/10/14 1:11cv00792 Denied Plaintiff 3.1 4/10/14 Obviousness 1:11cv00792 Denied Plaintiff 3.1 4/10/14 Testing 1:12cv00282 Denied Plaintiff 3.4 5/14/14 1:12cv00930 Granted Plaintiff 0.2 9/8/14 1:13cv00693 Denied Plaintiff 3.2 11/25/14 1:13cv00473 Denied Defendant 4.5 11/9/15 1:14cv00874 Granted Third Party 1.7 9/3/15 Infringement 1:13cv01524 Granted Plaintiff 0.5 11/24/15 FDA Procedures 1:13cv01524 Granted Plaintiff 0.5 11/24/15 Infringement; FDA Approved Label 1:14cv01317 Granted in Defendant 0.5 2/18/16 Written Description; part, Reasonable Royalties Denied in Part 1:14cv01317 Granted in Plaintiff 0.5 2/18/16 part, Denied in Part 1:14cv01317 Granted Plaintiff 0.5 2/18/16 Technical 153 1:10cv00258 Denied Defendant 2.6 7/21/16 1:10cv00258 Denied Defendant 2.6 7/21/16 1:13cv00453 Denied Defendant 4.1 12/19/16 Infringement 1:13cv00453 Denied Plaintiff 4.1 12/19/16 1:13cv02072 Denied Defendant 4.2 2/22/17 1:13cv02072 Denied Defendant 4.2 2/22/17 1:13cv02073 Granted Defendant 4.3 2/22/17 Survey

154 Increased Damages There were 1 Increased Damages contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 100.0%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 9.1. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

Distribution of Decisions by Month For Increased Damages 1

0.8

0.6

1

0.4 Number of Decisions 0.2

0 10 Month of Litigation from Motion Filing The supporting data is shown below.

Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision 1:10cv00315 Granted Plaintiff 9.1 3/13/12

155 Intervention There were 7 Intervention contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 78.6%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 1.6. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

Distribution of Decisions by Month For Intervention 3.2

2.8

2.4

2

1.6 3

1.2 2

Number of Decisions 0.8 1 1 0.4

0 1 2 3 4 Month of Litigation from Motion Filing The supporting data is shown below.

Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision 1:07cv00787 Granted Third Party 0.8 10/23/08 1:95cv00575 Granted in Third Party 3.7 6/29/00 part, Denied in Part 1:98cv00424 Granted Third Party 1.1 5/2/00 1:11cv00690 Granted Plaintiff 0.2 5/6/14 1:12cv00282 Denied Third Party 1.8 10/30/14 without Prejudice 1:14cv01457 Granted Third Party 2.1 5/1/15 1:14cv00874 Granted Third Party 1.7 9/3/15

156 Judgment on the Pleadings There were 13 Judgment on the Pleadings contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 50.0%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 4.8. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

Distribution of Decisions by Month For Judgment on the Pleadings 3.2

2.8

2.4

2

1.6 3 3

1.2 2 2

Number of Decisions 0.8 1 1 1 0.4

0 1 2 3 6 8 9 10 Month of Litigation from Motion Filing The supporting data is shown below.

Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision 1:99cv00301 Denied Defendant 7.7 12/14/00 1:09cv00072 Denied Plaintiff 1.8 10/16/09 1:11cv00054 Denied Plaintiff 5.0 6/21/12 1:11cv00271 Granted in Defendant 2.0 12/7/12 part, Denied in Part 1:13cv00693 Denied Defendant 8.9 4/10/14 1:13cv02072 Granted Defendant 7.2 3/17/15 1:14cv00787 Granted Defendant 0.4 10/17/14 1:14cv01489 Granted Defendant 8.8 10/8/15 1:13cv00957 Granted Defendant 9.6 1/12/16 1:13cv00474 Denied Defendant 7.6 3/22/16 1:13cv02073 Granted Defendant 0.6 6/4/15 1:14cv01204 Granted Defendant 0.2 2/29/16 1:15cv00542 Denied Defendant 2.7 10/31/16

157 Markman Decision There were 112 Markman Decision contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 0.9%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 25.7. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

Distribution of Decisions by Month For Markman Decision 120

100

80

60 108

40 Number of Decisions

20

0 2 2 11 12 13 Month of Litigation from Motion Filing The supporting data is shown below.

Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision 1:04cv01507 Markman Unknown 22.3 10/19/06 Decision 1:03cv00283 Markman Unknown 31.1 10/14/05 Decision 1:03cv00283 Markman Unknown 26.7 6/3/05 Decision 1:97cv00550 Markman Unknown 35.2 9/7/00 Decision 1:98cv00080 Markman Unknown 82.6 1/5/05 Decision 1:98cv00197 Markman Unknown 28.8 9/7/00 Decision 1:98cv00336 Markman Unknown 22.5 5/1/00 Decision 1:99cv00301 Markman Unknown 19.4 12/22/00 Decision 1:99cv00904 Markman Unknown 19.9 8/17/01 Decision 1:05cv00506 Markman Unknown 16.8 12/13/06 Decision 1:00cv00751 Markman Unknown 28.8 1/10/03 Decision 1:01cv00065 Markman Unknown 23.9 1/29/03 Decision 1:01cv00077 Markman Unknown 25.4 3/27/03 Decision 1:01cv00077 Markman Unknown 25.4 3/27/03 Decision 1:01cv00148 Markman Unknown 20.2 11/12/02 Decision 158 1:01cv00203 Markman Unknown 15.4 7/12/02 Decision 1:01cv00504 Markman Unknown 20.5 4/9/03 Decision 1:01cv00537 Markman Unknown 19.3 3/21/03 Decision 1:01cv00801 Markman Unknown 19.8 7/30/03 Decision 1:01cv00882 Markman Unknown 24.5 1/5/04 Decision 1:02cv00156 Markman Unknown 25.9 4/27/04 Decision 1:02cv01331 Markman Unknown 27.9 11/19/04 Decision 1:03cv00983 Markman Unknown 27.9 2/22/06 Decision 1:03cv01030 Markman Unknown 19.6 6/30/05 Decision 1:03cv01035 Markman Unknown 31.5 6/28/06 Decision 1:03cv01067 Markman Unknown 24.7 12/16/05 Decision 1:03cv01158 Markman Unknown 22.6 11/8/05 Decision 1:04cv00034 Markman Unknown 11.7 1/5/05 Decision 1:04cv01199 Markman Unknown 25.7 10/17/06 Decision 1:05cv00747 Markman Unknown 21.9 8/23/07 Decision 1:06cv00091 Markman Unknown 21.3 11/20/07 Decision 1:99cv00781 Markman Unknown 23.7 11/1/01 Decision 1:03cv00027 Markman Unknown 28.6 6/3/05 Decision 1:01cv00077 Markman Unknown 25.7 4/15/03 Decision 1:01cv00077 Markman Unknown 22.8 5/6/03 Decision 1:01cv00537 Markman Unknown 19.5 3/27/03 Decision 1:98cv00080 Markman Unknown 82.3 1/5/05 Decision 1:97cv00712 Markman Unknown 38.0 3/8/01 Decision 1:06cv00414 Markman Unknown 29.2 12/4/08 Decision 1:05cv00141 Markman Unknown 22.3 1/19/07 Decision 1:02cv01512 Markman Unknown 30.5 4/22/05 Decision 1:07cv00787 Markman Unknown 21.4 9/15/09 Decision 1:04cv01258 Markman Unknown 18.7 4/5/06 Decision 1:06cv00105 Markman Unknown 50.0 4/20/10 Decision 1:07cv00272 Markman Unknown 39.9 9/14/10 Decision 1:07cv00348 Markman Unknown 31.7 1/20/10 159 Decision 1:07cv00779 Markman Unknown 30.5 6/14/10 Decision 1:07cv00826 Markman Unknown 26.5 3/5/10 Decision 1:08cv00063 Markman Unknown 30.8 8/24/10 Decision 1:08cv00290 Markman Unknown 21.3 2/24/10 Decision 1:08cv00292 Markman Unknown 28.8 10/13/10 Decision 1:08cv00542 Markman Unknown 19.1 3/30/10 Decision 1:09cv00072 Markman Unknown 17.8 7/26/10 Decision 1:06cv00043 Markman Unknown 61.5 3/9/11 Decision 1:07cv00521 Markman Unknown 38.7 11/18/10 Decision 1:08cv00760 Markman Unknown 26.9 1/5/11 Decision 1:09cv00515 Markman Unknown 27.1 10/18/11 Decision 1:08cv00568 Markman Unknown 39.3 12/19/11 Decision 1:09cv00627 Markman Unknown 29.1 1/24/12 Decision 1:10cv00039 Markman Unknown 29.1 6/19/12 Decision 1:11cv00165 Markman Unknown 25.5 4/9/13 Decision 1:11cv00792 Markman Unknown 31.0 4/10/14 Decision 1:11cv00792 Markman Unknown 31.8 5/5/14 Decision 1:12cv01525 Markman Unknown 18.4 6/3/14 Decision 1:12cv00282 Markman Unknown 26.2 5/14/14 Decision 1:11cv00615 Markman Unknown 36.3 7/22/14 Decision 1:12cv00569 Markman Unknown 26.6 7/21/14 Decision 1:12cv00650 Markman Unknown 27.1 8/26/14 Decision 1:12cv00930 Markman Unknown 24.8 8/14/14 Decision 1:12cv01138 Markman Unknown 21.5 6/30/14 Decision 1:12cv01572 Granted Unknown 18.2 6/3/14 1:11cv00908 Markman Unknown 39.8 1/30/15 Decision 1:11cv01025 Markman Unknown 40.4 3/10/15 Decision 1:12cv01036 Markman Unknown 30.4 2/24/15 Decision 1:12cv01200 Markman Unknown 29.0 2/24/15 Decision 1:13cv00136 Markman Unknown 22.6 12/12/14 Decision 1:13cv00473 Markman Unknown 22.0 1/23/15 Decision 160 1:13cv02072 Markman Unknown 15.6 4/9/15 Decision 1:13cv00473 Markman Unknown 24.0 3/27/15 Decision 1:13cv00737 Markman Unknown 24.6 5/14/15 Decision 1:13cv01524 Markman Unknown 21.0 6/1/15 Decision 1:14cv00599 Markman Unknown 14.6 7/31/15 Decision 1:14cv01038 Markman Unknown 10.2 6/18/15 Decision 1:14cv01038 Markman Unknown 10.9 7/8/15 Decision 1:13cv02012 Markman Unknown 23.3 11/18/15 Decision 1:14cv00829 Markman Unknown 15.3 10/6/15 Decision 1:14cv00874 Markman Unknown 14.0 9/3/15 Decision 1:14cv00912 Markman Unknown 16.3 11/18/15 Decision 1:14cv01317 Markman Unknown 12.1 10/20/15 Decision 1:13cv00453 Markman Unknown 32.9 12/17/15 Decision 1:13cv00474 Markman Unknown 33.4 1/7/16 Decision 1:14cv01083 Markman Unknown 16.6 1/8/16 Decision 1:14cv01119 Markman Unknown 16.9 1/29/16 Decision 1:14cv01204 Markman Unknown 16.8 2/9/16 Decision 1:14cv01227 Markman Unknown 17.3 3/4/16 Decision 1:14cv01410 Markman Unknown 15.6 3/4/16 Decision 1:14cv01515 Markman Unknown 14.2 2/29/16 Decision 1:15cv00192 Markman Unknown 12.2 3/4/16 Decision 1:12cv00487 Markman Unknown 47.1 3/21/16 Decision 1:15cv00026 Markman Unknown 15.9 5/6/16 Decision 1:14cv01482 Markman Unknown 18.4 6/28/16 Decision 1:15cv00288 Markman Unknown 18.8 10/24/16 Decision 1:15cv00542 Markman Unknown 16.7 11/14/16 Decision 1:15cv00647 Markman Unknown 15.8 11/21/16 Decision 1:15cv01159 Markman Unknown 11.1 11/18/16 Decision 1:15cv00525 Markman Unknown 20.0 2/22/17 Decision 1:15cv00218 Markman Unknown 26.3 5/19/17 Decision 1:15cv00262 Markman Unknown 24.2 3/30/17 161 Decision 1:15cv00634 Markman Unknown 20.9 4/19/17 Decision 1:15cv01031 Markman Unknown 17.6 4/24/17 Decision 1:16cv00275 Markman Unknown 13.4 6/1/17 Decision 1:12cv00487 Markman Unknown 60.9 5/15/17 Decision

162 Permanent Injunction There were 19 Permanent Injunction contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 47.4%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 7.7. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

Distribution of Decisions by Month For Permanent Injunction 3.2

2.8

2.4

2

1.6 3 3 3

1.2 2 2 2

Number of Decisions 0.8 1 1 1 1 0.4

0 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Month of Litigation from Motion Filing The supporting data is shown below.

Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision 1:05cv00747 Granted Plaintiff 1.9 4/30/09 1:00cv00751 Granted Plaintiff 8.9 11/18/03 1:00cv01013 Denied Defendant 8.8 9/30/02 1:01cv00070 Denied Plaintiff 1.3 5/29/01 1:01cv00203 Denied Plaintiff 1.8 2/11/03 without Prejudice 1:01cv00504 Granted Plaintiff 9.7 3/10/04 1:01cv00504 Granted Plaintiff 3.0 6/9/04 1:03cv01067 Denied Plaintiff 11.3 1/10/07 without Prejudice 1:03cv01158 Denied Plaintiff 10.6 3/27/07 without Prejudice 1:05cv00747 Granted Plaintiff 10.0 8/1/08 1:06cv00091 Granted Plaintiff 9.8 11/10/08 1:97cv00550 Denied Plaintiff 11.3 3/28/02 1:98cv00080 Denied Plaintiff 15.0 9/29/08 1:99cv00274 Granted Plaintiff 5.3 6/9/04 1:06cv00282 Denied Plaintiff 6.2 12/22/09 1:08cv00542 Denied Plaintiff 5.3 11/3/10 1:08cv00063 Denied Plaintiff 9.6 8/12/11 1:11cv01007 Granted Plaintiff 7.1 3/31/14 1:14cv01317 Granted Plaintiff 8.5 1/5/17 163 Post-trial

There were 118 Post-trial contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 14.4%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision (or in the case of Markman rulings, from case filing to decision) was 8.2. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

Distribution of Decisions by Month For Post-trial 20

16

12

18 8 15 15 14 14 13 11 Number of Decisions 9 4

4 2 2 1 0 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Month of Litigation from Motion Filing

The supporting data is shown below. The table below identifies motion subjects ("What") and grounds ("Why") and includes the designation GIP for those subjects and grounds which were granted in part and denied in part.

Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date What Why 1:00cv00751 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 2/14/03 Validity; Anticipation 1:00cv00751 Denied Plaintiff 8.5 11/18/03 Willfulness 1:00cv00751 Denied Plaintiff 8.5 11/18/03 Infringement; Willfulness 1:00cv00751 Denied Defendant 8.5 11/18/03 Noninfringement 1:00cv00751 Denied Defendant 8.5 11/18/03 Invalidity; Best Mode 1:00cv00751 Denied Defendant 8.5 11/18/03 No Willfulness 1:00cv00751 Denied Defendant 8.5 11/18/03 Invalidity; Obviousness 1:00cv00796 Denied Defendant 13.2 2/13/03 Noninfringement 1:00cv00796 Granted in Plaintiff 13.2 2/13/03 part, Denied in Part 1:00cv00796 Denied Plaintiff 13.2 2/13/03 1:01cv00065 Granted in Defendant 1.6 4/21/03 part, Denied in Part 1:01cv00065 Granted in Defendant 1.6 4/21/03 part, Denied in Part 1:01cv00065 Denied Plaintiff 6.4 11/14/03 1:01cv00504 Denied Defendant 8.3 3/10/04 1:01cv00504 Denied Defendant 8.3 3/10/04 164 1:02cv01331 Denied Defendant 0.1 12/10/04 Noninfringement 1:02cv01331 Granted in Defendant 0.1 12/9/04 Noninfringement part, Denied in Part 1:02cv01331 Denied Plaintiff 6.5 12/8/05 Validity; Obviousness 1:02cv01331 Denied Defendant 6.5 12/8/05 Noninfringement; Invalidity; Written Description; Indefiniteness 1:03cv00027 Denied Defendant 10.3 5/11/06 Noninfringement; invalidity 1:03cv00027 Denied Plaintiff 8.5 5/11/06 Noninfringement; DOE; Invalidity; Obviousness 1:03cv00027 Denied Plaintiff 6.9 9/24/07 Infringement 1:03cv00027 Denied Defendant 0.3 10/19/07 Noninfringement 1:03cv00283 Denied Defendant 9.6 6/15/06 Noninfringement; Invalidity 1:03cv01067 Denied Defendant 11.2 1/10/07 Noninfringement - Literal; Invalidity - Anticipation; No Willfulness 1:03cv01158 Denied Defendant 7.9 8/17/06 Noninfringement; Invalidity - Anticipation 1:95cv00545 Denied Defendant 7.2 7/31/03 1:95cv00545 Denied Defendant 7.2 7/31/03 1:96cv00589 Denied Defendant 6.6 4/23/01 1:97cv00550 Granted in Defendant 15.6 3/28/02 part, Denied in Part 1:97cv00550 Denied Plaintiff 12.4 3/28/02 1:97cv00550 Granted Defendant 12.4 3/28/02 1:97cv00550 Denied Defendant 12.3 3/28/02 1:97cv00550 Denied Plaintiff 4.1 2/17/04 1:97cv00550 Denied Defendant 0.1 3/11/05 Noninfringement 1:97cv00550 Denied Defendant 11.4 3/27/06 Noninfringement; Invalidity - Obviousness 1:97cv00550 Denied Defendant 11.4 3/27/06 Noninfringement 1:97cv00700 Granted Defendant 12.4 3/28/02 1:97cv00700 Denied Defendant 0.1 3/11/05 Noninfringement 1:97cv00700 Denied Defendant 11.4 3/27/06 Noninfringement 1:98cv00019 Denied Plaintiff 11.4 3/27/06 Noninfringement; Invalidity - Obviousness 1:98cv00080 Denied Defendant 0.2 2/17/05 Not Available 1:98cv00080 Denied Defendant 0.0 2/17/05 Infringement 1:98cv00080 Granted in Defendant 0.0 2/17/05 Validity - Anticipation; 112; part, Obviousness Denied in Part 1:98cv00080 Denied Defendant 23.4 3/30/07 Improper Claim Construction 1:98cv00080 Denied Defendant 23.4 3/30/07 Noninfringement; Ownership; Invalidity - Obviousness 1:98cv00197 Granted in Defendant 12.4 3/28/02 part, Denied in Part 1:99cv00274 Granted Plaintiff 4.9 8/28/01

1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 4.9 8/28/01 Inequitable Conduct165 1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 5.2 7/8/03 Noninfringement 1:99cv00274 Denied Plaintiff 4.7 7/8/03 Validity - Obviousness 1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 7.2 6/9/04 Noninfringement - Direct 1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 7.2 6/9/04 Limitation on Damages 1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 7.2 6/9/04 Noninfringement - Contributory 1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 7.2 6/9/04 Invalidity - Indefiniteness 1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 7.2 6/9/04 Invalidity - Enablement 1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 7.2 6/9/04 No Willfulness 1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 7.2 6/9/04 Invalidity - Anticipation; Obviousness 1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 5.6 6/9/04 Noninfringement - Contributory 1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 5.6 6/9/04 Noninfringement - Direct 1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 5.6 6/9/04 Invalidity - Anticipation; Obviousness 1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 5.6 6/9/04 Invalidity - Indefiniteness 1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 5.6 6/9/04 Limitation on Damages 1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 5.6 6/9/04 Invalidity - Enablement 1:99cv00274 Denied Plaintiff 5.6 6/9/04 Willfulness 1:99cv00274 Denied Plaintiff 0.1 7/1/04 Willfulness 1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 0.1 7/1/04 1:99cv00781 Granted Plaintiff 7.0 8/9/02 Validity - Anticipation - On-Sale 1:99cv00781 Denied Plaintiff 7.0 8/9/02 Infringement 1:99cv00904 Granted in Plaintiff 10.9 9/27/02 Noninfringement; Invalidity part, - Written Description Denied in Granted - Obviousness - Part Denied 1:00cv00751 Denied Plaintiff 9.1 11/18/03 Willfulness 1:00cv00751 Granted in Plaintiff 0.2 2/19/03 part, Denied in Part 1:00cv00751 Denied Defendant 9.1 11/18/03 Invalidity; Best Mode 1:00cv00751 Denied Defendant 9.1 11/18/03 No Willfulness 1:00cv00751 Denied Defendant 9.1 11/18/03 Noninfringement 1:97cv00700 Denied Defendant 64.4 3/27/06 Noninfringement 1:97cv00550 Denied Plaintiff 3.2 9/15/08 Damages - Non-infringing Substitutes 1:08cv00542 Denied Defendant 5.3 11/3/10 Invalidity - Obviousness 1:06cv00091 Denied Plaintiff 11.8 4/21/11 Validity - Anticipation; Obviousness 1:08cv00542 Granted in Plaintiff 5.3 11/3/10 Validity - Derivation part, (Denied); Obviousness Denied in (Granted); Infringement Part (Granted 1:08cv00542 Denied Defendant 9.4 3/9/11 Inequitable Conduct 1:08cv00542 Denied Defendant 5.3 11/3/10 Invalidity - Obviousness 1:08cv00063 Granted in Defendant 9.9 8/12/11 Invalidity - Anticipation part, (Denied); Obviousness Denied in (New Trial Granted) Part

166 1:08cv00063 Granted in Plaintiff 9.6 8/12/11 Validity - Anticipation part, (Granted); Obviousness Denied in (Denied) Part 1:08cv00292 Denied Defendant 7.0 7/13/11 Invalidity - Enablement; Obviousness 1:08cv00292 Denied Plaintiff 6.9 7/13/11 Invalidity - Anticipation; Obviousness 1:10cv00050 Denied Plaintiff 6.2 8/25/11 Validity - Anticipation; Obviousness 1:10cv00050 Denied Plaintiff 6.2 8/25/11 Validity - Anticipation; Obviousness; Evidence not previously disclosed; Improper and Prejudicial Statements; Erroneous Jury instructions; Claim Construction 1:06cv00028 Denied Plaintiff 8.5 1/12/12 Infringement 1:06cv00028 Denied Plaintiff 8.5 1/12/12 Failure to Construe Claim; Inconsistent Expert Testimony 1:09md02118 Denied Plaintiff 0.2 5/24/11 Validity - Obviousness 1:10cv00315 Denied Defendant 9.1 3/13/12 Limitation on Damages 1:06cv00557 Denied Plaintiff 9.6 8/20/12 Validity - Anticipation; Obviousness 1:06cv00557 Denied Plaintiff 9.6 8/20/12 Claim Construction; Jury Instruction - 102(g); Exclusion of Evidence 1:09cv00515 Denied Defendant 9.1 8/20/12 Invalidity - Obviousness; Improper Inventorship 1:09cv00515 Denied Defendant 8.9 8/20/12 Erroneous Jury Instruction; Evidentiary Error; Weight of the Evidence 1:98cv00197 Granted in Defendant 12.4 3/28/02 part, Denied in Part 1:10cv00258 Granted in Defendant 7.7 9/5/13 Noninfringement - GIP; part, Invalidity - GIP Denied in Part 1:11cv01007 Denied Defendant 7.1 3/31/14 Invalidity 1:11cv01007 Denied Defendant 7.1 3/31/14 Noninfringement 1:11cv00792 Denied Defendant 11.2 5/18/15 Noninfringement 1:11cv00792 Granted in Defendant 11.2 5/18/15 Invalidity - Anticipation part, Denied in Part 1:11cv00908 Granted in Defendant 7.8 10/28/14 part, Denied in Part 1:12cv00930 Granted in Defendant 16.3 2/22/16 Noninfringement - Denied; part, Invalidity - Obviousness Denied in Part 1:11cv00908 Denied Defendant 11.3 3/31/16 1:11cv00908 Denied Defendant 11.3 3/31/16 1:11cv00908 Denied Plaintiff 11.1 3/31/16

1:11cv00908 Denied Defendant 11.1 3/31/16 167 1:11cv00908 Denied Defendant 11.1 3/31/16 1:10cv00315 Granted Plaintiff 9.1 3/13/12 Increase Damage Award Amount 1:14cv01317 Denied Defendant 8.6 1/3/17 1:14cv01317 Denied Defendant 8.6 1/3/17 1:14cv01317 Granted Defendant 0.1 3/16/16 1:14cv01317 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 3/14/16 1:13cv01534 Denied Defendant 11.5 5/25/17 1:13cv01534 Denied Defendant 11.5 5/25/17 1:10cv00258 Denied Defendant 7.7 6/12/17 1:10cv00258 Granted in Plaintiff 7.7 6/12/17 part, Denied in Part

168 Preliminary Injunction There were 34 Preliminary Injunction contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 35.3%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 5.7. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

Distribution of Decisions by Month For Preliminary Injunction 8

7

6

5

4 8

3

Number of Decisions 2 4 3 3 3 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 Month of Litigation from Motion Filing The supporting data is shown below.

Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision 1:00cv00404 Denied Plaintiff 11.5 3/30/01 1:00cv00886 Granted Plaintiff 3.5 3/31/05 1:00cv01069 Granted Plaintiff 3.0 5/23/01 1:02cv00332 Granted Plaintiff 1.1 6/7/02 1:03cv00283 Denied Plaintiff 8.1 11/21/03 1:03cv00364 Granted Plaintiff 2.2 8/4/03 1:03cv00402 Granted Plaintiff 7.4 12/11/03 1:04cv01414 Granted in Plaintiff 1.7 1/14/05 part, Denied in Part 1:99cv00833 Denied Plaintiff 5.8 5/31/00 1:05cv00853 Granted in Plaintiff 5.6 6/22/06 part, Denied in Part 1:07cv00137 Denied Plaintiff 4.9 8/2/07 1:06cv00613 Denied Plaintiff 6.4 11/28/07 1:07cv00137 Denied Plaintiff 3.9 8/2/07 1:07cv00190 Denied Plaintiff 6.0 1/9/08 1:07cv00585 Denied Plaintiff 9.0 10/3/08 1:07cv00787 Denied Plaintiff 8.9 12/9/08 1:10cv00841 Denied Plaintiff 4.7 3/10/11 1:11cv00173 Granted Plaintiff 13.4 5/3/12 1:11cv00054 Denied Plaintiff 8.9 6/19/12 1:12cv00613 Granted Plaintiff 9.6 3/27/13 169 1:12cv01491 Granted Plaintiff 7.8 8/6/13 1:09cv00018 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 9/19/12 1:09md02118 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 9/19/12 1:13cv01656 Denied Plaintiff 4.9 3/24/14 1:14cv00270 Denied Plaintiff 2.7 7/10/14 1:14cv00559 Granted Defendant 5.7 3/10/15 1:14cv01268 Denied Plaintiff 1.0 11/4/14 1:14cv01482 Denied Plaintiff 5.8 6/12/15 1:14cv01483 Denied Plaintiff 5.8 6/12/15 1:15cv00661 Denied Plaintiff 5.4 2/4/16 without Prejudice 1:15cv01031 Denied Plaintiff 5.6 6/2/16 1:15cv01031 Denied Defendant 2.7 6/2/16 1:16cv00171 Denied Plaintiff 15.1 7/12/17 without Prejudice 1:17cv00014 Denied Plaintiff 5.6 7/6/17

170 Remand Motion There were 1 Remand Motion contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 100.0%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 7.6. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

Distribution of Decisions by Month For Remand Motion 1

0.8

0.6

1

0.4 Number of Decisions 0.2

0 8 Month of Litigation from Motion Filing The supporting data is shown below.

Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision 1:99cv00449 Granted Plaintiff 7.6 3/21/00

171 Sanctions/Attorneys Fees

There were 42 Sanctions/Attorneys Fees contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 33.3%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision (or in the case of Markman rulings, from case filing to decision) was 6.6. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

Distribution of Decisions by Month For Sanctions/Attorneys Fees 6

5

4

3 6 6 5 2 4 4 4

Number of Decisions 3 3 1 2 2 2 1 0 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Month of Litigation from Motion Filing

The supporting data is shown below. The table below identifies motion subjects ("What") and grounds ("Why") and includes the designation GIP for those subjects and grounds which were granted in part and denied in part.

Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date What Why 1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 4.9 8/28/01 Attorney fees Post-Judgment 1:99cv00781 Granted Defendant 8.5 9/19/02 Attorney Fees Partial 1:01cv00401 Denied Defendant 2.2 11/20/02 Sanctions Unknownw 1:04cv01258 Granted Defendant 0.1 4/13/06 Sanctions Unknown 1:01cv00148 Granted Plaintiff 4.5 5/4/04 Attorney Fees Post-Judgment 1:02cv01250 Denied Defendant 16.2 8/11/06 Attorney fees 35 USC 285 1:95cv00545 Granted Plaintiff 7.2 7/31/03 Attorney Fees Post-Judgment 1:03cv01067 Granted in Plaintiff 10.8 1/10/07 Attorney fees Post-Judgment part, Denied in Part 1:04cv00305 Denied Defendant 5.0 11/8/06 Sanctions Unknown 1:04cv01199 Denied Defendant 16.6 3/31/08 Attorney Fees Post-Judgment 1:05cv00506 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 11/14/06 Sanctions Discovery 1:05cv00747 Granted Plaintiff 10.0 8/1/08 Attorney Fees Post-Judgment 1:07cv00787 Denied Defendant 3.8 1/28/09 Sanctions Unknown 1:08cv00568 Granted Plaintiff 5.6 8/2/11 Sanctions 1:08cv00568 Granted Plaintiff 5.2 8/2/11 Sanctions 1:09md02118 Granted Third Party 7.6 1/12/12 Attorney Fees 35 USC 285 1:10cv00315 Denied Plaintiff 9.6 3/13/12 Attorney Fees 35 USC 285 1:11cv00690 Denied Defendant 5.9 4/25/12 Sanctions without Prejudice 172 1:08cv00568 Denied Defendant 3.0 5/3/12 Attorney Fees 35 USC 285 without Prejudice 1:08cv00568 Denied Defendant 3.0 5/3/12 Attorney Fees 35 USC 285 without Prejudice 1:09cv00515 Granted Plaintiff 6.2 3/11/13 Attorney Fees Post-Judgment 1:10cv00039 Denied Defendant 0.5 8/7/12 Attorney Fees Post-Judgment without Prejudice 1:11cv00313 Denied Defendant 3.4 10/25/13 Attorney Fees 35 USC 285 1:11cv01007 Denied Plaintiff 7.6 3/31/14 Attorney Fees 35 USC 285 without Prejudice 1:11cv01007 Denied Plaintiff 7.6 3/31/14 Attorney Fees Exceptional Case without Prejudice 1:11cv01007 Denied Defendant 7.6 3/31/14 without Prejudice 1:13cv00428 Denied Defendant 3.1 11/18/13 Sanctions 1:12cv00142 Denied Defendant 3.4 10/25/13 Attorney Fees 35 USC 285 1:11cv00690 Granted Defendant 3.3 7/23/14 Attorney Fees Post-Judgment 1:12cv00282 Denied Defendant 4.9 10/30/14 Attorney Fees 35 USC 285 without Prejudice 1:12cv00451 Denied Defendant 7.4 3/31/15 Attorney Fees 35 USC 285 1:12cv00651 Denied Defendant 12.1 9/14/15 Attorney Fees Post-Judgment 1:13cv02072 Denied Defendant 11.3 9/10/15 Sanctions Rule 11 1:07cv00823 Granted in Plaintiff 5.7 5/27/15 Attorney Fees Contractual part, Denied in Part 1:12cv01138 Granted Defendant 14.8 3/31/16 Attorney Fees 35 USC 285 1:11cv00440 Denied Defendant 11.5 3/31/16 Attorney Fees 35 USC 285 1:12cv01138 Denied Defendant 3.9 3/31/16 Attorney Fees Supplemental 1:13cv00581 Denied Defendant 6.1 5/2/16 Attorney Fees 35 USC 285 1:13cv01534 Granted Plaintiff 11.9 5/25/17 Attorney Fees 35 USC 285 1:13cv01534 Denied Defendant 0.9 4/11/16 Sanctions 1:12cv01491 Denied Plaintiff 9.0 5/26/17 Attorney Fees 35 USC 285 1:12cv00614 Denied Defendant 5.7 7/11/17 Attorney Fees 35 USC 285

173 Sever There were 29 Sever contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 34.5%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 4.4. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

Distribution of Decisions by Month For Sever 8

7

6

5

4 8

3 6

Number of Decisions 2 4 4 4 3 1

0 1 3 4 5 6 9 Month of Litigation from Motion Filing The supporting data is shown below.

Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision 1:04cv01199 Denied Defendant 5.9 4/13/05 1:04cv00305 Denied Plaintiff 0.2 4/13/05 1:08cv00889 Granted Plaintiff 8.0 10/2/09 1:07cv00348 Granted Plaintiff 0.7 4/22/09 1:07cv00333 Granted Plaintiff 2.8 6/25/09 1:06cv00495 Granted Defendant 4.1 11/3/09 1:04cv01199 Denied Defendant 5.9 4/13/05 1:03cv00102 Granted Defendant 8.3 12/1/04 1:01cv00155 Granted Plaintiff 5.9 11/28/01 1:01cv00065 Granted Defendant 1.0 2/20/03 1:10cv00735 Denied Defendant 6.0 12/22/11 1:11cv00827 Denied Defendant 4.3 4/30/12 1:11cv00828 Denied Defendant 4.3 4/30/12 1:11cv00829 Denied Defendant 4.3 4/30/12 1:11cv00830 Denied Defendant 4.3 4/30/12 1:11cv00831 Denied Defendant 4.3 4/30/12 1:11cv00834 Denied Defendant 3.5 4/30/12 1:11cv00834 Denied Defendant 3.1 4/30/12 1:11cv00054 Granted Plaintiff 3.9 6/21/12 1:11cv00829 Denied Defendant 4.3 4/30/12 1:11cv00831 Denied Defendant 4.3 4/30/12 1:12cv00487 Denied Defendant 8.6 3/27/13 1:10cv01028 Granted Defendant 5.5 5/15/12 1:13cv00453 Denied Defendant 9.0 9/3/14 174 1:13cv00473 Denied Defendant 3.8 9/9/14 1:14cv00340 Granted Defendant 0.5 8/5/14 1:15cv00486 Denied Defendant 2.4 9/10/15 1:13cv00473 Denied Defendant 2.2 11/9/15 1:15cv00760 Denied Defendant 5.5 9/29/16

175 Stay

There were 133 Stay contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 49.2%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision (or in the case of Markman rulings, from case filing to decision) was 3.5. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

Distribution of Decisions by Month For Stay 35

30

25

20

32 15

10 19 Number of Decisions 18 16 14 11 5 9 7 4 2 0 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 Month of Litigation from Motion Filing

The supporting data is shown below. The table below identifies motion subjects ("What") and grounds ("Why") and includes the designation GIP for those subjects and grounds which were granted in part and denied in part.

Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date What Why 1:02cv00156 Denied Defendant 2.6 2/27/03 Stay of Discovery Unknown 1:01cv00882 Granted Plaintiff 3.7 8/27/02 Stay of Discovery 1:01cv00801 Granted Defendant 1.1 9/17/04 Stay Execution of Unknown Judgment 1:99cv00696 Granted Defendant 0.8 6/11/01 Case Pending Reexam 1:99cv00449 Denied Defendant 8.0 3/21/00 Stay of Litigation 1:99cv00274 Granted Defendant 0.1 7/1/04 Case/Enforceme Pending Appeal nt of Judgment 1:99cv00274 Denied Defendant 5.6 6/9/04 Case/Execution Pending post-trial motions of Judgment 1:98cv00080 Denied Plaintiff 3.2 8/26/04 Stay of Litigation Pending Arbitration 1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 4.2 11/18/05 Case Other Litigation 1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 4.2 11/18/05 Case Other Litigation 1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 4.2 11/18/05 Case Other Litigation 1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 4.2 11/18/05 Case Other Litigation 1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 4.7 11/18/05 Case Other Litigation 1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 4.7 11/18/05 Case Other Litigation 1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 5.0 11/18/05 Stay of Litigation Pending Resolution of Another Action 1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 5.3 11/18/05 Case Other Litigation 1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 5.2 11/18/05 Case Other Litigation 1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 5.4 11/18/05 Stay of Litigation Pending Resolution of Another Action 176 1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 5.4 11/18/05 Stay of Litigation Pending Resolution of Another Action 1:04cv00918 Denied Defendant 5.7 2/15/05 Stay of Litigation Pending Resolution of without MDL Prejudice 1:04cv00884 Granted Plaintiff 1.4 4/27/05 Case Pending other litigation 1:04cv00852 Denied Defendant 5.3 3/31/05 Stay of Litigation Unknown 1:04cv00818 Granted Defendant 6.3 2/15/05 1:04cv00418 Granted Plaintiff 1.6 11/9/04 Stay of Discovery 1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 5.1 11/18/05 Case Other Litigation 1:04cv01293 Granted Defendant 4.1 2/15/05 Stay of Litigation Pending Resolution of MDL 1:98cv00478 Denied Defendant 3.1 8/26/04 Case Pending Arbitration 1:98cv00478 Denied Defendant 3.1 8/26/04 Judgement Pending Arbitration 1:02cv01427 Denied Plaintiff 3.8 6/19/03 Case Other Litigation 1:00cv00886 Granted Defendant 6.6 9/25/01 Stay of Litigation Pending Appeal 1:00cv00886 Denied Defendant 3.9 3/31/05 Stay of Lititgation Pending Arbitration 1:00cv00886 Denied Defendant 3.9 3/31/05 Stay of Litigation Pending Arbitration 1:01cv00504 Granted in Defendant 1.5 4/28/04 Stay of Injunction Unknown part, Denied in Part 1:01cv00504 Granted Defendant 4.1 11/27/02 Discovery 1:01cv00628 Granted in Defendant 2.1 2/1/02 Stay of Litigation Pending Resolution of part, Another Action Denied in Part 1:01cv00504 Denied Defendant 0.4 11/27/02 Case Pending Reexam 1:01cv00387 Denied Plaintiff 1.2 4/10/02 Case Pending Reexam 1:01cv00148 Denied Defendant 0.8 1/29/04 Attorney Fees Pending Appeal Motion 1:01cv00203 Granted Defendant 0.1 12/27/02 Stay of Unknown Judgement 1:05cv00027 Granted Defendant 4.1 11/18/05 Case Other Litigation 1:04cv01258 Granted Defendant 0.0 6/7/06 Stay of Injunction Unknown 1:04cv00305 Granted Plaintiff 2.5 11/8/06 Trial Pending Appeal 1:05cv00768 Denied Defendant 7.4 8/17/06 Stay of Litigation Unknown 1:03cv00402 Denied Defendant 6.0 12/11/03 Stay of Litigation Pending Arbitration 1:03cv00364 Denied Defendant 1.1 9/29/03 Order Pending Appeal 1:03cv00364 Denied Defendant 1.8 8/4/03 Unknown 1:03cv00027 Denied Plaintiff 0.2 6/14/05 Stay of Trial Pending Joinder of Litigant 1:03cv00027 Denied Defendant 0.9 5/19/05 Stay of Litigation Unknown 1:06cv00105 Denied Defendant 8.7 12/20/06 Stay of Litigation Pending Arbitration 1:04cv00305 Denied Plaintiff 0.2 4/13/05 Stay of Litigation Unknown 1:04cv00034 Denied Defendant 3.1 8/26/04 Stay of Litigation Pending Arbitration 1:03cv00527 Denied Defendant 6.3 2/24/04 Stay of Discovery Unknown without Prejudice 1:03cv00526 Denied Defendant 6.2 2/24/04 Stay of Litigation Unknown without Prejudice 1:03cv00102 Granted Third Party 8.3 12/1/04 Stay of Litigation Unknown 1:05cv00768 Denied Plaintiff 1.4 11/29/06 Stay of Unknown Discovery/Litigati 177 on 1:06cv00530 Denied Defendant 2.3 3/2/07 Stay of Litigation Pending Resolution of Another Action 1:07cv00251 Granted Defendant 0.1 6/20/07 Stay of Litigation Pending Resolution of ITC 1:06cv00091 Denied Defendant 8.5 11/10/08 Case/Permanent Pending Appeal Injunction 1:06cv00197 Granted Plaintiff 0.0 9/14/07 Stay of Litigation Pending Settlement 1:07cv00843 Granted Defendant 0.2 2/25/08 Stay of Litigation Unknown 1:07cv00843 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 3/11/08 Stay of Litigation Pending Resolution of ITC 1:06cv00197 Denied Defendant 0.4 5/21/08 1:08cv00334 Denied Defendant 3.0 7/2/09 Case Pending Reexam 1:07cv00521 Denied Defendant 2.5 2/18/09 Case Unknown 1:08cv00889 Granted Plaintiff 4.5 10/2/09 discovery 1:09cv00639 Denied Defendant 1.4 11/3/09 1:09md02118 Denied Defendant 1.3 8/23/10 Case UNknown 1:09cv00695 Granted Defendant 0.0 11/19/09 Case 1:10cv00503 Granted Defendant 4.7 11/22/10 Case Pending Reexam 1:09cv00264 Denied Plaintiff 5.9 11/22/10 Subject Matter Jurisdiction 1:09cv00872 Denied Plaintiff 2.7 4/6/10 Case 1:06cv00414 Denied Plaintiff 1.5 9/8/10 Case Pending Appeal 1:10cv00315 Denied Defendant 6.6 4/13/11 Case Pending Reexam 1:08cv00063 Denied Defendant 0.2 9/2/10 Case Pending Reexam 1:10cv00039 Denied Defendant 1.4 3/16/11 Case Pending Ruling on Appeal 1:07cv00521 Granted in Defendant 0.1 6/17/11 Case Pending Reexam part, Denied in Part 1:09md02118 Denied Defendant 0.0 5/25/11 Injunction 1:09md02118 Denied Defendant 0.0 5/25/11 Injunction 1:10cv00123 Granted Plaintiff 1.2 5/5/11 Case Pending Related Litigation 1:10cv00428 Granted Defendant 2.9 8/16/11 Case Pending Mediation 1:10cv00735 Denied Defendant 7.7 12/16/11 Case Pending Reexam 1:10cv00735 Denied Defendant 6.0 12/22/11 Particular Claims 1:11cv00165 Granted Defendant 2.8 8/16/11 Case Pending Mediation 1:11cv00173 Denied Defendant 12.0 8/7/12 Case Pending Reexam 1:11cv00303 Denied Defendant 7.6 4/5/12 Claims Against Party 1:11cv00440 Denied Defendant 8.2 4/4/12 Case Pending Related Litigation 1:11cv00496 Granted Defendant 0.1 7/25/11 Case Pending ITC Proceeding 1:11cv00623 Denied Plaintiff 11.2 8/28/12 Case Pending ITC Proceeding 1:11cv00827 Denied Defendant 4.3 4/30/12 Claims Against Pending Manufacturer Suit without Party Prejudice 1:11cv00581 Denied Defendant 1.4 5/3/12 Case Pending Related Litigation without Prejudice 1:11cv00890 Granted Defendant 5.8 8/7/12 Case First to File Rule 1:12cv00394 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 5/15/12 Case Pending MDL Transfer 1:10cv00269 Granted Defendant 0.1 5/4/12 Claims as to One Pending Appeal Patent 1:10cv00269 Denied Defendant 0.8 4/25/12 Case Pending Reexam 1:10cv00039 Denied Defendant 1.4 3/16/11 Case Pending Other Litigation 178 1:11cv00165 Denied Defendant 2.8 8/16/11 Case Consolidation without Prejudice 1:11cv00309 Denied Defendant 6.7 4/11/13 Case Pending Reexam 1:12cv00204 Granted Defendant 4.1 8/7/12 Case First to File Rule 1:12cv00545 Granted Defendant 0.1 6/13/12 Case Pending ITC Proceeding 1:12cv00547 Granted Defendant 0.1 6/15/12 Case Pending ITC Proceeding 1:12cv00930 Denied Defendant 9.0 5/8/14 Case Pending Reexam 1:12cv00931 Granted in Defendant 8.2 5/8/14 Case Pending CBM Review part, Denied in Part 1:12cv01491 Denied Plaintiff 6.4 3/12/14 Case Pending Inter Partes without Review Prejudice 1:12cv01767 Granted Plaintiff 0.9 7/2/13 Case Pending JPML Decision 1:12cv00301 Granted Plaintiff 1.5 2/18/14 Case Pending Reexam 1:12cv00448 Granted Plaintiff 1.5 2/18/14 Case Pending Reexam 1:12cv01525 Granted Defendant 4.3 4/24/14 Case Pending Inter Partes Review 1:06cv00043 Denied Plaintiff 0.5 4/17/14 Case Pending New Counsel 1:11cv00054 Granted Defendant 2.5 7/11/14 Case Pending Related Litigation 1:13cv00473 Denied Defendant 3.8 9/9/14 Case Pending Inter Partes Review 1:14cv00014 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 6/9/14 Case Pending Related Litigation 1:14cv00425 Granted Defendant 2.7 1/12/15 Case Pending Related Litigation 1:14cv00530 Granted Defendant 2.5 1/12/15 Case Pending Related Litigation 1:14cv00529 Granted Defendant 2.3 1/12/15 Case Pending Related Litigation 1:11cv01007 Denied Defendant 2.3 1/14/15 Damages Pending Reexam 1:14cv00617 Granted Defendant 8.6 7/31/15 Claims Against Pending Manufacturer Particular Parties Action 1:14cv01142 Granted Defendant 8.3 7/31/15 Claims Against Pending Manufacturer Particular Parties Action 1:14cv01143 Granted Defendant 8.3 7/31/15 Claims Against Pending Manufacturer Particular Parties Action 1:14cv01144 Granted Defendant 8.3 7/31/15 Claims Against Pending Manufacturer Particular Parties Action 1:13cv00453 Denied Defendant 7.6 5/15/15 Particular Counts Pending Inter Partes Review 1:13cv00453 Granted in Plaintiff 4.5 3/20/15 Counterclaims Pending Decision on part, Patent Issues Denied in Part 1:11cv00908 Denied Defendant 0.0 3/25/15 Particular Count Pending Reexam 1:13cv02012 Denied Defendant 5.7 9/1/15 Case Pending Inter Partes Review 1:13cv02073 Granted Defendant 2.5 10/13/15 Case Pending Inter Partes Review 1:13cv00473 Denied Defendant 2.2 11/9/15 Particular Counts 1:12cv00930 Denied Defendant 1.5 4/11/16 Case Pending Reexam 1:13cv00685 Denied Defendant 3.0 4/19/16 Case Pending Related Litigation 1:15cv00856 Granted Defendant 5.9 9/20/16 Case Pending Reexam 1:16cv00533 Granted Defendant 1.9 9/23/16 Case Pending ITC Proceeding 1:16cv00056 Granted Defendant 9.3 7/31/17 Case Pending Reexam; Pending Appeal 179 1:16cv00531 Granted Defendant 0.1 10/21/16 Case Pending ITC Proceeding 1:16cv00534 Granted Defendant 0.1 10/17/16 Case Pending ITC Proceeding 1:14cv01317 Denied Defendant 0.1 1/9/17 Permanent Pending Appeal Injunction

180 Summary Judgment

There were 443 Summary Judgment contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 36.6%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision (or in the case of Markman rulings, from case filing to decision) was 4.4. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

Distribution of Decisions by Month For Summary Judgment 160

140

120

100

80 148 60

88 Number of Decisions 40 76

20 32 24 23 26 9 10 0 3 1 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Month of Litigation from Motion Filing

The supporting data is shown below. The table below identifies motion subjects ("What") and grounds ("Why") and includes the designation GIP for those subjects and grounds which were granted in part and denied in part.

Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date What Why 1:00cv00751 Granted Defendant 2.2 1/15/03 Invalidity 1:01cv00065 Denied Defendant 3.5 1/29/03 Invalidity 1:01cv00077 Denied Defendant 3.6 3/27/03 Invalidity 1:01cv00077 Granted Defendant 3.6 3/27/03 Invalidity 1:01cv00203 Denied Defendant 3.0 7/30/02 Invalidity Best Mode 1:01cv00504 Denied Defendant 1.2 4/9/03 Invalidity Prior Art 1:01cv00882 Denied Defendant 3.6 1/5/04 Invalidity 1:02cv00156 Granted in Defendant 3.1 4/27/04 Invalidity 102(g) part, Denied in Part 1:02cv00332 Denied Plaintiff 6.1 6/9/03 Judicial Estoppel Invalidity 1:03cv00027 Denied Defendant 2.3 6/3/05 Invalidity 1:03cv00983 Denied Defendant 4.8 2/22/06 Invalidity 112 1:03cv00983 Denied Defendant 4.8 2/22/06 Invalidity 102; Anticipation 1:03cv00983 Denied Plaintiff 4.8 2/22/06 Validity 102; 103 1:03cv00983 Granted in Plaintiff 4.8 2/22/06 Validity 112 part, Denied in Part 1:04cv01507 Denied Defendant 3.4 10/19/06 Invalidity 102 1:04cv01507 Denied Defendant 3.7 10/19/06 Invalidity Obviousness 1:03cv01067 Denied Defendant 4.8 12/16/05 Invalidity; Content Anticipation; Obviousness of Prior Art 181 1:03cv01158 Denied Defendant 3.4 11/8/05 Invalidity Prior Art 1:04cv00034 Denied Defendant 4.8 1/5/05 Invalidity 1:04cv00067 Denied Defendant 7.9 1/6/06 Invalidity Recapture 1:04cv01507 Denied Defendant 3.4 10/19/06 Invalidity 112 1:04cv01507 Denied Defendant 3.4 10/19/06 Invalidity 103 1:03cv01035 Denied Defendant 5.0 6/28/06 Invalidity Indefiniteness 1:04cv01199 Granted Defendant 4.0 10/17/06 Invalidity 102; 103 1:04cv01507 Denied Defendant 3.7 10/19/06 Invalidity Written Description 1:05cv00747 Granted Plaintiff 6.7 8/23/07 Validity Anticipation 1:05cv00747 Denied Defendant 6.6 8/23/07 Invalidity Indefiniteness 1:06cv00557 Denied Plaintiff 7.4 9/29/08 Validity 102(g) without Prejudice 1:06cv00557 Denied Defendant 7.4 9/29/08 Invalidity without Prejudice 1:06cv00414 Denied Plaintiff 4.1 12/4/08 Invalidity Anticipation; Obviousness 1:06cv00028 Denied Defendant 0.9 11/5/08 Invalidity without Prejudice 1:06cv00282 Denied Defendant 6.1 4/28/09 Invalidity Anticipation; Obviousness 1:06cv00282 Denied Defendant 5.1 4/28/09 Invalidity Anticipation; Obviousness 1:06cv00105 Granted Defendant 7.8 4/20/10 Invalidity Anticipation; Obviousness 1:07cv00272 Granted in Plaintiff 12.1 9/14/10 Validity; Anticipation-GIP; Best part, Enforceability Mode-Granted; Denied in Enablement-Denied; Part Written Description-Denied; Inequitable Conduct-Granted; Inventorship-Granted 1:07cv00333 Granted Plaintiff 4.1 1/20/10 Invalidity Enablement; Indefiniteness; Written Description 1:07cv00333 Denied Plaintiff 4.1 1/20/10 Invalidity 103; Obviousness 1:07cv00787 Denied Defendant 3.5 9/15/09 Invalidity 103 1:07cv00787 Denied Defendant 3.5 9/15/09 Invalidity 103 1:07cv00826 Denied Defendant 2.6 3/5/10 Invalidity On-Sale; Anticipation 1:08cv00063 Granted Plaintiff 8.6 8/24/10 Validity Anticipation 1:08cv00063 Granted in Defendant 8.6 8/24/10 Invalidity Anticipation-GIP; part, Obviousness-Denied Denied in Part 1:08cv00542 Granted Plaintiff 4.5 3/30/10 Validity; Derivation; Inequitable Enforceability Conduct 1:08cv00292 Denied Plaintiff 3.6 10/19/10 Invalidity Enablement 1:08cv00292 Granted in Defendant 3.6 10/19/10 Invalidity 35 USC 255-Granted; part, Indefiniteness-Granted; Denied in Anticipation-Denied; Part Obviousness-Denied 1:09cv00072 Denied Defendant 3.5 7/26/10 Invalidity Obviousness 1:09cv00072 Granted in Defendant 3.6 7/26/10 Invalidity; No Enablement; Written part, Priority Date Description Denied in Part

1:08cv00292 Denied Plaintiff 3.6 10/19/10 Invalidity Obviousness 182 1:06cv00043 Granted in Defendant 5.0 3/9/11 Invalidity Indefiniteness-Granted; part, Anticipation-Denied Denied in Part 1:07cv00521 Denied Defendant 2.5 11/18/10 Priority Date; Anticipation; Obviousness Invalidity 1:08cv00760 Denied Defendant 2.7 1/5/11 Invalidity Anticipation 1:08cv00760 Denied Defendant 2.7 1/5/11 Invalidity Anticipation; Obviousness 1:08cv00760 Denied Defendant 2.7 1/5/11 Invalidity Written Description; Enablement 1:06cv00557 Denied Defendant 4.7 8/26/11 Invalidity 102(g) 1:08cv00568 Denied Defendant 4.5 11/15/11 Invalidity Anticipation; Obviousness; Best Mode 1:09cv00515 Denied Defendant 4.1 9/26/11 Invalidity Written Description; Enablement; Obviousness 1:09cv00627 Denied Defendant 4.2 1/24/12 Invalidity; Anticipation Expiration 1:10cv00735 Granted in Defendant 3.0 8/28/12 Invalidity - GIP Written Description - part, Granted; Anticipation - Denied in Denied Part 1:11cv00829 Granted Defendant 2.8 8/16/12 Invalidity 101 1:10cv00258 Granted in Defendant 5.8 11/8/12 Invalidity Anticipation; Obviousness part, Denied in Part 1:10cv00258 Granted in Plaintiff 5.2 11/8/12 Validity Anticipation - GIP; part, Obviousness - Denied Denied in Part 1:11cv00827 Granted Defendant 2.8 8/16/12 Invalidity 101 1:10cv00428 Denied Defendant 4.0 4/9/13 Invalidity Anticipation; Obviousness 1:11cv00054 Granted in Defendant 3.6 3/19/13 Invalidity Anticipation - Denied; part, Obviousness - Denied; Denied in Indefiniteness - Denied; Part Enablement - Denied; Written Description - GIP 1:11cv00054 Granted in Plaintiff 3.1 3/19/13 Validity Anticipation - Denied; part, Obviousness - Denied; Denied in Indefiniteness - Granted; Part Enablement - Denied; Written Description - Denied 1:13cv00576 Granted in Defendant 3.3 7/26/13 Invalidity Written Description - part, Granted; Enablement - Denied in Granted; 102(g)(2) - Part Denied 1:10cv00658 Granted in Defendant 5.6 1/13/14 Validity part, Denied in Part 1:10cv00999 Granted in Defendant 4.8 9/30/13 Invalidity Indefiniteness - Granted; part, Patentable Subject Matter Denied in - GIP; Written Description - Part Denied; Enablement - Denied 1:11cv00690 Granted Defendant 7.6 3/31/14 Invalidity Indefiniteness 1:11cv00690 Denied Plaintiff 7.1 3/31/14 Validity Indefiniteness 1:11cv00792 Granted in Defendant 5.3 4/10/14 Invalidity Anticipation - Denied; part, Indefiniteness - Granted Denied in 183 Part 1:11cv00908 Granted in Defendant 4.4 1/2/14 Invalidity Obviousness - GIP; part, Anticipation - Denied; Denied in Enablement - Denied; Part Written Description - Denied 1:11cv01254 Denied Defendant 4.6 11/20/13 Invalidity Anticipation; Obviousness 1:12cv01138 Denied Defendant 5.2 6/30/14 Collateral Estoppel 1:11cv00615 Denied Defendant 4.6 7/22/14 Invalidity Indefiniteness; Anticipation 1:12cv00650 Denied Defendant 5.5 8/26/14 Invalidity 1:12cv00651 Denied Defendant 5.5 8/26/14 Invalidity 1:12cv00930 Denied Defendant 3.6 8/14/14 Invalidity Indefinitenss; Anticipation; Obviousness 1:11cv00440 Granted Defendant 6.4 4/2/15 Invalidity; Claim Anticipation Construction 1:12cv00569 Denied Defendant 2.1 12/17/14 Invalidity Anticipation 1:12cv01138 Granted Defendant 2.5 12/15/14 Invalidity 35 USC 101 1:12cv01138 Denied Plaintiff 2.5 12/15/14 Validity 35 USC 101 1:12cv00569 Granted Defendant 2.5 2/4/15 Invalidity Anticipation 1:13cv00693 Denied Defendant 3.5 11/25/14 Invalidity Obviousness 1:13cv00941 Granted Defendant 1.2 12/18/14 Invalidity 35 USC 101 1:13cv00942 Granted Defendant 1.2 12/18/14 Invalidity 35 USC 101 1:12cv01036 Granted in Defendant 3.5 8/3/15 Invalidity Indefiniteness - GIP; part, Written Description - Denied in Denied Part 1:12cv01200 Granted in Defendant 3.5 8/3/15 Invalidity Indefiniteness - GIP; part, Written Description - Denied in Denied Part 1:12cv01300 Granted Defendant 3.5 8/3/15 Invalidity Indefiniteness - GIP; Written Description - Denied 1:13cv00473 Denied Defendant 5.4 11/9/15 Invalidity Indefiniteness; Anticipation 1:13cv00473 Granted in Defendant 5.2 11/9/15 Invalidity Anticipation - GIP; 101 - part, Denied; Enablement - Denied in Denied; Written Part Description - Denied 1:13cv00473 Granted in Plaintiff 5.2 11/9/15 Validity Anticipation - GIP part, Denied in Part 1:10cv00050 Granted Defendant 3.0 12/4/15 Invalidity Obviousness 1:13cv01534 Denied Defendant 6.8 4/11/16 Invalidity 35 USC 101 1:13cv00453 Granted Defendant 5.0 12/19/16 Invalidity; Priority Anticipation Date 1:13cv02073 Denied Plaintiff 4.1 2/22/17 Validity Obviousness 1:14cv01482 Granted Defendant 3.4 3/28/17 Invalidity Anticipation 1:14cv01483 Granted in Defendant 3.4 3/28/17 Invalidity Anticipation part, Denied in Part 1:00cv00751 Denied Plaintiff 2.1 1/15/03 Infringement; Literal Willfulness 1:01cv00065 Granted in Defendant 3.5 1/29/03 Noninfringement- Literal-Granted; Doctrine part, GIP; of Equivalents-Denied Denied in Invalidity-Denied Part 184 1:01cv00065 Granted in Defendant 3.4 1/29/03 Noninfringement Literal-GIP; Doctrine of part, Equivalents-Denied Denied in Part 1:01cv00077 Denied Defendant 3.6 3/27/03 Limitation of Damages 1:01cv00077 Denied Defendant 3.6 3/27/03 Noninfringement 1:01cv00077 Denied Defendant 3.6 3/27/03 Noninfringement 1:01cv00077 Denied Defendant 3.6 3/27/03 Noninfringement 1:01cv00077 Denied Defendant 3.6 3/27/03 Noninfringement 1:01cv00077 Granted in Plaintiff 3.6 3/27/03 Infringement; Literal part, Validity Denied in Part 1:01cv00148 Denied Defendant 5.2 11/12/02 Infringement Literal 1:01cv00504 Denied Defendant 1.2 4/9/03 Noninfringement 1:01cv00537 Granted Defendant 1.5 3/21/03 Noninfringement 1:01cv00801 Granted in Plaintiff 3.6 7/30/03 Noninfringement part, Denied in Part 1:01cv00801 Denied Defendant 3.6 7/30/03 Infringement 1:01cv00882 Denied Defendant 3.6 1/5/04 Noninfringement 1:02cv00156 Denied Plaintiff 3.1 4/27/04 Infringement Literal 1:02cv00156 Granted in Defendant 3.1 4/27/04 Noninfringement part, Denied in Part 1:02cv01331 Denied Defendant 3.3 11/19/04 Noninfringement 1:03cv00027 Denied Plaintiff 2.3 6/3/05 Noninfringement 1:03cv00027 Denied Defendant 2.3 6/3/05 Noninfringement 1:03cv00027 Denied Plaintiff 2.3 6/3/05 Infringement 1:03cv00115 Denied Defendant 7.2 10/7/04 Noninfringement Inducing 1:03cv00115 Denied Defendant 7.2 10/7/04 Invalidity; Prior Art Noninfringement 1:03cv00115 Denied Defendant 7.2 10/7/04 Invalidity; Prior Art Noninfringement 1:03cv00983 Granted in Defendant 4.8 2/22/06 Noninfringement Literal-GIP; part, Inducing-Denied; Denied in Contributory-Denied; Part Doctrine of Equivalents-Granted 1:03cv00983 Granted in Plaintiff 4.8 2/22/06 Infringement Literal-GIP; part, Inducing-Denied; Denied in Contributory-Denied Part 1:03cv01030 Granted in Defendant 3.0 6/30/05 Noninfringement part, Denied in Part 1:04cv01507 Denied Plaintiff 3.4 10/19/06 Infringement Literal; Doctrine of Equivalents 1:04cv01507 Denied Plaintiff 3.4 10/19/06 Infringement Literal; Doctrine of Equivalents 1:03cv01067 Denied Plaintiff 4.8 12/16/05 Infringement Literal; Doctrine of Equivalents 1:03cv01067 Denied Defendant 4.8 12/16/05 Noninfringement Literal 1:03cv01158 Denied Defendant 3.4 11/8/05 Noninfringement 185 1:04cv00034 Granted Defendant 4.8 1/5/05 Noninfringement 1:04cv01199 Granted in Defendant 4.0 10/17/06 Noninfringement Literal part, Denied in Part 1:04cv01507 Granted Defendant 3.7 10/19/06 Noninfringement Literal; Doctrine of Equivalents 1:95cv00545 Denied Plaintiff 7.6 3/28/02 Noninfringement 1:97cv00550 Denied Plaintiff 6.3 10/12/00 Infringement 1:97cv00550 Denied Defendant 6.3 10/12/00 Noninfringement 1:97cv00712 Denied Plaintiff 10.4 9/29/00 Infringement 1:98cv00336 Granted in Plaintiff 2.2 5/1/00 Infringement part, Denied in Part 1:98cv00478 Granted Defendant 5.9 1/11/05 Noninfringement 1:98cv00717 Denied Plaintiff 7.6 6/29/00 Validity; Enforceability; Infringement 1:99cv00301 Denied Plaintiff 2.6 12/14/00 Invalidity; Anticipation Noninfringement 1:99cv00570 Denied Plaintiff 7.0 9/29/00 Infringement 1:99cv00904 Denied Defendant 3.3 8/17/01 Noninfringement 1:99cv00904 Denied Defendant 3.3 8/17/01 Noninfringement 1:99cv00904 Denied Plaintiff 3.3 8/17/01 Infringement Literal 1:04cv00305 Granted Defendant 3.9 5/10/06 Noninfringement Method Steps Partially Performed by the Patentee 1:04cv01258 Granted in Defendant 3.6 4/5/06 Noninfringement Literal part, Denied in Part 1:04cv01258 Denied Plaintiff 3.6 4/5/06 Infringement Literal 1:04cv01507 Granted Defendant 3.4 10/19/06 Noninfringement Literal; Doctrine of Equivalents 1:03cv00283 Granted Defendant 12.7 4/4/07 Noninfringement; Invalidity 1:05cv00747 Denied Defendant 6.6 8/23/07 Noninfringement Literal 1:06cv00557 Denied Plaintiff 7.4 9/29/08 Infringement without Prejudice 1:06cv00557 Denied Defendant 7.4 9/29/08 Noninfringement without Prejudice 1:06cv00414 Granted Plaintiff 4.1 12/4/08 Noninfringement Literal 1:06cv00414 Denied Defendant 4.1 12/4/08 Infringement Literal 1:99cv00904 Denied Defendant 3.3 8/17/01 Noninfringement 1:99cv00904 Denied Defendant 3.3 8/17/01 Noninfringement 1:06cv00028 Denied Defendant 1.4 11/5/08 Noninfringement without Prejudice 1:06cv00028 Denied Defendant 1.4 11/5/08 No Willfulness without Prejudice 1:06cv00282 Granted in Plaintiff 6.1 4/28/09 Infringement Literal part, Denied in Part 186 1:06cv00282 Granted in Defendant 6.1 4/28/09 Noninfringement Literal part, Denied in Part 1:06cv00105 Granted in Defendant 7.8 4/20/10 NonInfringement Literal-Denied; part, Control-Denied; Denied in lnducing-Denied; Part Contributory-Granted 1:07cv00272 Denied Plaintiff 12.1 9/14/10 Infringement Literal; Doctrine of Equivalents 1:07cv00272 Granted in Plaintiff 12.1 9/14/10 Infringement and Anticipation-GIP; Best part, Validity Mode-Granted; Denied in Enablement-Denied; Part Written Description-Denied; Inequitable Conduct-Granted; Inventorship-Granted 1:07cv00272 Granted Defendant 12.1 9/14/10 Noninfringement Doctrine of Equivalents; Literal 1:07cv00272 Granted in Plaintiff 24.1 9/15/11 Noninfringement - Literal - GIP; Indefiniteness part, GIP; Invalidity - - Denied; Enablement - Denied in Denied Denied; Written Part Description - Denied; Anticipation - Denied 1:07cv00272 Granted in Defendant 24.1 9/15/11 Infringement - Indefiniteness; part, Denied; Validity - Enablement; Written Denied in Granted Description; Anticipation Part 1:07cv00333 Denied Plaintiff 4.1 1/20/10 Noninfringement Literal 1:07cv00826 Denied Defendant 2.6 3/5/10 Noninfringement 1:08cv00063 Granted in Plaintiff 8.6 8/24/10 Infringement Literal part, Denied in Part 1:08cv00063 Granted Defendant 8.6 8/24/10 Limitation on Patent Marking Damages; No Willfulness 1:08cv00063 Granted in Defendant 8.6 8/24/10 Noninfringement Literal part, Denied in Part 1:08cv00542 Granted Plaintiff 4.5 3/30/10 Infringement Literal 1:08cv00542 Granted Plaintiff 4.5 3/30/10 Noninfringement Literal 1:08cv00542 Granted in Defendant 4.5 3/30/10 Invalidity-Denied; Anticipation; Obviousness; part, Noninfringement- Literal Denied in GIP Part 1:09cv00072 Granted Defendant 3.6 7/26/10 Noninfringement Literal; Doctrine of Equivalents 1:08cv00292 Granted Plaintiff 3.6 10/19/10 Noninfringement Literal 1:09cv00072 Denied Plaintiff 3.6 7/26/10 Infringement Literal; Doctrine of Equivalents 1:08cv00292 Granted in Defendant 3.6 10/19/10 Noninfringement Literal part, Denied in Part 1:06cv00043 Denied Plaintiff 5.0 3/9/11 Infringement Literal; Doctrine of Equivalents 1:06cv00043 Granted Defendant 5.0 3/9/11 Noninfringement Literal; Doctrine of Equivalents 187 1:07cv00521 Granted in Plaintiff 2.5 11/18/10 Infringement Literal part, Denied in Part 1:08cv00760 Denied Plaintiff 2.7 1/5/11 Infringement Literal 1:08cv00760 Granted Defendant 2.7 1/5/11 Noninfringement Literal 1:09cv00264 Granted in Defendant 4.3 1/20/11 Noninfringement Literal-Granted; Doctrine part, of Equivalents-Denied Denied in Part 1:10cv00315 Granted Plaintiff 2.8 4/13/11 Infringement 1:08cv00568 Granted Defendant 4.5 11/15/11 Noninfringement Inducing 1:08cv00568 Granted Defendant 4.5 11/15/11 Noninfringement 1:08cv00568 Granted in Defendant 4.5 11/15/11 Noninfringement part, Denied in Part 1:09cv00515 Granted Plaintiff 4.1 9/26/11 Infringement 1:09cv00515 Granted in Defendant 4.1 9/26/11 Noninfringement part, Denied in Part 1:06cv00557 Granted Defendant 0.9 8/26/11 No Willfulness 1:10cv00735 Denied Defendant 2.5 8/28/12 Noninfringement 1:10cv00039 Granted Defendant 4.5 6/19/12 Noninfringement 1:10cv00258 Granted in Defendant 5.2 11/8/12 Noninfringement part, Denied in Part 1:10cv00841 Granted Defendant 3.1 9/13/12 Noninfringement 1:10cv00428 Denied Plaintiff 4.0 4/9/13 Infringement 1:10cv00428 Granted Defendant 3.6 4/9/13 Noninfringement 1:11cv00054 Denied Plaintiff 3.6 3/19/13 Infringement 1:11cv00054 Granted in Defendant 3.1 3/19/13 Noninfringement Doctrine of Equivalents part, Denied in Part 1:11cv00173 Denied Plaintiff 2.7 4/9/13 Infringement 1:11cv00173 Denied Defendant 2.2 4/9/13 Noninfringement Literal 1:13cv00576 Granted Defendant 3.3 7/26/13 Noninfringement 1:10cv00503 Granted in Defendant 3.5 9/9/13 Noninfringement part, Denied in Part 1:10cv00503 Denied Plaintiff 3.5 9/9/13 Infringement 1:10cv00658 Granted Plaintiff 5.0 1/13/14 No Estoppel 1:10cv00658 Granted in Defendant 5.0 1/13/14 Noninfringement part, Denied in Part 1:10cv00999 Denied Plaintiff 4.8 9/30/13 Infringement 1:10cv00999 Granted in Defendant 4.2 9/30/13 Noninfringement part, Denied in Part

188 1:11cv00792 Granted in Plaintiff 5.3 4/10/14 Infringement - Obviousness part, Denied; Validity - Denied in Granted Part 1:11cv00792 Granted in Defendant 5.3 4/10/14 Noninfringement part, Denied in Part 1:11cv00908 Granted in Defendant 3.7 1/2/14 Noninfringement part, Denied in Part 1:11cv01254 Granted in Defendant 4.6 11/20/13 Noninfringement part, Denied in Part 1:11cv01258 Denied Plaintiff 5.6 2/6/14 Infringement 1:11cv01258 Granted in Defendant 4.8 2/6/14 Noninfringement part, Denied in Part 1:13cv00148 Granted Defendant 8.0 12/4/13 Noninfringement 1:10cv00050 Granted Defendant 4.6 10/25/13 Noninfringement 1:10cv00050 Granted Defendant 4.6 10/25/13 Noninfringement 1:12cv00282 Granted Defendant 3.4 5/14/14 Noninfringement 1:11cv00615 Granted Defendant 4.6 7/22/14 Noninfringement 1:12cv00650 Granted in Defendant 5.5 8/26/14 Noninfringement part, Denied in Part 1:12cv00651 Granted Defendant 5.5 8/26/14 Noninfringement 1:12cv00930 Denied Defendant 3.9 8/14/14 Noninfringement 1:08cv00889 Granted Defendant 1.8 8/14/14 No Willfulness 1:11cv00440 Granted Defendant 6.4 4/2/15 Noninfringement Collateral Estoppel 1:12cv00569 Denied Defendant 2.1 12/17/14 Noninfringement 1:12cv00569 Granted in Plaintiff 2.1 12/17/14 Infringement part, Denied in Part 1:12cv01138 Granted Defendant 2.1 12/15/14 Noninfringement 1:12cv01138 Denied Plaintiff 2.1 12/15/14 Infringement 1:13cv01656 Granted Defendant 9.2 3/27/15 Noninfringement 1:12cv00569 Denied Defendant 2.5 2/4/15 Noninfringement 1:13cv00693 Granted Defendant 3.5 11/25/14 Noninfringement 1:12cv01036 Denied Plaintiff 3.5 8/3/15 Infringement 1:12cv01036 Granted Defendant 2.9 8/3/15 Noninfringement; DOE No Willfulness 1:12cv01200 Denied Plaintiff 3.5 8/3/15 Infringement 1:12cv01200 Granted Defendant 2.9 8/3/15 Noninfringement; No Willfulness 1:12cv01300 Denied Plaintiff 3.5 8/3/15 Infringement 1:12cv01300 Granted Defendant 2.9 8/3/15 Noninfringement; DOE No Willfulness 1:13cv00473 Denied Defendant 5.4 11/9/15 Noninfringement

189 1:13cv00473 Granted in Defendant 5.2 11/9/15 Noninfringement part, Denied in Part 1:10cv00050 Granted Defendant 3.0 12/4/15 Noninfringement 1:10cv00258 Denied Defendant 5.7 4/11/16 Invalidity; Indefiniteness Noninfringement 1:13cv00453 Denied Defendant 5.0 12/19/16 Noninfringement 1:13cv02072 Granted in Defendant 4.4 2/22/17 Noninfringement Direct; Indirect part, Denied in Part 1:13cv02073 Granted Defendant 4.1 2/22/17 Noninfringement 1:14cv01482 Granted Defendant 3.4 3/28/17 Noninfringement 1:14cv01482 Denied Plaintiff 3.4 3/28/17 Infringement 1:14cv01483 Granted in Defendant 3.4 3/28/17 Noninfringement - part, GIP; No Denied in Willfulness - Part Denied 1:97cv00700 Denied Defendant 3.7 1/27/05 Invalidity Obviousness 1:00cv00751 Denied Plaintiff 2.1 1/15/03 Content of Prior Art 1:00cv00751 Granted Plaintiff 2.1 1/15/03 Validity Prior Art 1:00cv00886 Denied Plaintiff 8.2 9/25/01 1:00cv00886 Denied Plaintiff 11.3 3/31/06 without Prejudice 1:00cv01013 Denied Plaintiff 3.0 5/16/01 No License 1:00cv01013 Granted in Plaintiff 8.4 9/30/02 Validity; No part, License Denied in Part 1:01cv00065 Granted Plaintiff 3.0 1/14/03 Validity Anticipation 1:01cv00065 Granted Plaintiff 3.0 1/14/03 No Prosecution Laches 1:01cv00077 Denied Defendant 3.6 3/27/03 1:01cv00148 Granted Defendant 3.8 10/22/02 No Patent Misuse 1:01cv00148 Denied Plaintiff 3.8 10/22/02 Unenforceability Patent Misuse 1:01cv00148 Denied Plaintiff 3.8 10/22/02 Unenforceability Inequitable Conduct 1:01cv00203 Denied Defendant 3.0 7/30/02 Lack of Standing 1:01cv00203 Denied Defendant 3.0 7/30/02 Prosecution Laches 1:01cv00203 Denied Defendant 3.0 7/30/02 Invalidity Enablement 1:01cv00203 Granted in Plaintiff 2.9 7/30/02 Infringement Literal-Granted; part, Inducing-Denied; Denied in Contributory-Denied Part 1:01cv00387 Granted Plaintiff 2.8 4/9/03 1:01cv00504 Denied Plaintiff 1.2 4/9/03 Validity Anticipation; On-Sale; Public use; Obviousness 1:01cv00504 Denied Plaintiff 1.2 4/9/03 Infringement 1:01cv00504 Denied Plaintiff 1.2 4/9/03 Infringement 1:01cv00504 Denied Defendant 1.2 4/9/03 Invalidity Enablement; Indefiniteness; Written Description

190 1:01cv00504 Denied Defendant 1.2 4/9/03 Enforce Settlement Agreement 1:01cv00537 Denied Defendant 1.7 3/21/03 Enforceability Inequitable Conduct 1:01cv00537 Denied Defendant 1.7 3/21/03 Validity On-Sale; Anticipation 1:01cv00537 Granted in Plaintiff 1.5 3/21/03 part, Denied in Part 1:01cv00801 Granted Plaintiff 4.1 7/30/03 No Lanham Act Violation; No Unfair Competition 1:01cv00801 Denied Plaintiff 3.7 7/30/03 Invalidity Anticipation; On-Sale 1:01cv00801 Granted in Defendant 3.6 7/30/03 Noninfringement part, Denied in Part 1:01cv00882 Granted Plaintiff 5.8 1/5/04 1:01cv00882 Granted Plaintiff 3.6 1/5/04 No License 1:01cv00882 Denied Plaintiff 3.6 1/5/04 Validity Prior Art 1:01cv00882 Granted Plaintiff 3.6 1/5/04 Enforceability Inequitable Conduct 1:01cv00882 Granted Plaintiff 3.6 1/5/04 Validity Best Mode 1:01cv00882 Denied Defendant 3.6 1/5/04 License 1:01cv00882 Granted Plaintiff 2.9 1/5/04 Validity Indefiniteness 1:02cv00156 Granted Plaintiff 3.1 4/27/04 Validity Anticipation 1:02cv00156 Granted Plaintiff 3.1 4/27/04 Validity Anticipation; On-Sale 1:02cv00156 Denied Defendant 3.1 4/27/04 Laches 1:02cv00156 Granted in Defendant 3.1 4/27/04 Limitation of Lost Profits part, Damages Denied in Part 1:02cv00156 Denied Defendant 2.5 4/27/04 Invalidity Anticipation 1:02cv00332 Granted Defendant 4.5 6/9/03 No Judicial Validity Estoppel 1:02cv00332 Denied Defendant 3.2 6/9/03 No Priority Date; Judicial Estoppel 1:02cv00332 Denied Plaintiff 1.6 6/9/03 Priority Date; No Judicial Estoppel 1:02cv01331 Granted in Plaintiff 3.3 11/19/04 Infringement-Deni part, ed; Denied in Validity-Granted Part 1:02cv01331 Granted in Plaintiff 3.4 11/22/04 Infringement; part, Validity Denied in Part 1:02cv01331 Granted in Defendant 3.3 11/19/04 Invalidity Double Patenting part, Denied in Part 1:02cv01331 Granted in Defendant 3.4 11/22/04 Invalidity 102(e); 102(g) part, Denied in Part 1:02cv01331 Granted in Defendant 3.4 11/22/04 Invalidity Anticipation part, Denied in Part 191 1:02cv01331 Denied Defendant 3.4 11/22/04 Invalidity Written Description 1:02cv01331 Denied Defendant 3.4 11/22/04 Invalidity 112-2 1:02cv01331 Denied Plaintiff 7.2 3/18/05 Enforceability Inequitable Conduct 1:03cv00027 Granted in Plaintiff 2.3 6/3/05 Validity part, Denied in Part 1:03cv00027 Denied Defendant 2.3 6/3/05 Noninfringement 1:03cv00027 Denied Defendant 2.3 6/3/05 Limitation on Lost Profits Damages 1:03cv00115 Denied Defendant 7.2 10/7/04 Lack of Remedy 1:03cv00283 Denied Plaintiff 2.3 6/3/05 Infringement 1:03cv00283 Granted in Plaintiff 2.3 6/3/05 Validity Anticipation part, Denied in Part 1:03cv00283 Denied Defendant 2.3 6/3/05 Noninfringement Doctrine of Equivalents 1:03cv00283 Denied Defendant 4.1 10/14/05 Invalidity 112 1:03cv00283 Denied Defendant 4.1 10/14/05 Noninfringement 1:03cv00528 Granted Defendant 4.4 2/24/04 Noninfringement 271(g) 1:03cv00983 Granted in Defendant 4.8 2/22/06 No Unfair part, Competition Denied in Part 1:03cv00983 Granted in Plaintiff 4.8 2/22/06 No Tortious part, Interference Denied in Part 1:03cv01030 Granted in Plaintiff 2.9 6/28/05 No Laches; No part, Equitable Denied in Estoppel; No Part Implied License 1:03cv01030 Granted Plaintiff 2.9 6/28/05 Enforceability Inequitable Conduct 1:03cv01030 Denied Defendant 2.9 6/28/05 Limitation on Lost Profits; Marking Damages; No Willfulness 1:03cv01030 Denied Defendant 2.9 6/28/05 Implied License 1:03cv01067 Granted Defendant 4.8 12/16/05 Limitation on 287(a) Damages 1:03cv01138 Denied Defendant 4.1 10/14/05 Invalidity 112 1:03cv01138 Denied Defendant 4.1 10/14/05 Noninfringement 1:03cv01158 Granted in Defendant 3.4 11/8/05 Invalidity Indefiniteness part, Denied in Part 1:04cv00034 Denied Plaintiff 4.8 1/5/05 Infringement 1:04cv01507 Denied Defendant 3.5 10/19/06 Lack of Standing 1:04cv01199 Denied Defendant 4.0 10/17/06 Noninfringement Literal 1:95cv00545 Denied Defendant 6.2 3/28/02 Infringement 1:96cv00589 Denied Defendant 3.2 8/14/01 1:97cv00550 Denied Plaintiff 6.3 10/12/00 Priority Date 1:97cv00550 Granted in Plaintiff 6.3 10/12/00 Enforceability part, Denied in Part 1:97cv00550 Denied Defendant 3.3 9/21/04 Prosecution 192 History Estoppel 1:97cv00550 Denied Plaintiff 3.7 1/27/05 Invalidity Obviousness 1:97cv00712 Granted in Plaintiff 6.5 9/29/00 No Unfair part, Competition Denied in Part 1:97cv00712 Granted in Plaintiff 2.7 2/20/01 Limitation on part, Damages; No Denied in Injunction; No Part Attorney Fees 1:98cv00080 Denied Plaintiff 4.1 12/17/04 Collateral Estoppel 1:98cv00164 Denied Defendant 8.5 9/24/01 1:98cv00336 Denied Plaintiff 3.5 5/1/00 No Laches; No Equitable Estoppel 1:98cv00336 Granted in Plaintiff 3.5 5/1/00 Validity part, Denied in Part 1:98cv00336 Granted in Defendant 3.5 5/1/00 part, Denied in Part 1:98cv00424 Denied Defendant 2.8 2/24/00 Limitation on Damages 1:98cv00717 Granted Plaintiff 6.2 6/29/00 Infringement 1:98cv00717 Denied Defendant 6.2 6/29/00 1:98cv00717 Denied Defendant 5.6 6/29/00 1:98cv00750 Denied Defendant 1.7 2/7/00 1:99cv00301 Granted Defendant 2.6 12/14/00 No Tortious Interference 1:99cv00301 Denied Plaintiff 2.6 12/14/00 Validity Indefiniteness 1:99cv00301 Denied Plaintiff 2.6 12/14/00 Enforceability Inequitable Conduct 1:99cv00301 Denied Plaintiff 2.6 12/14/00 Invalidity On-Sale; Anticipation 1:99cv00904 Denied Defendant 3.3 8/17/01 Limitation on Lost Profits Damages 1:99cv00904 Granted Plaintiff 3.3 8/17/01 Content of Prior Art 1:99cv00904 Granted Plaintiff 3.3 8/17/01 Validity Anticipation 1:03cv01035 Denied Defendant 6.1 7/31/06 Unenforceability without Prejudice 1:04cv00305 Granted Defendant 3.9 5/10/06 Invalidity Enablement 1:04cv01258 Denied Plaintiff 3.6 4/5/06 Enforceability Inequitable Conduct 1:04cv01258 Denied Plaintiff 3.6 4/5/06 No Laches; No Equitable Estoppel 1:04cv01258 Denied Defendant 3.6 4/5/06 Laches; Equitable Estoppel 1:04cv01507 Denied Defendant 3.4 10/19/06 Unenforceability Inequitable Conduct 1:04cv01199 Denied Plaintiff 4.0 10/17/06 Content of Prior Printed Publication Art 1:03cv00283 Denied Plaintiff 12.7 4/4/07 Validity Anticipation 1:05cv00356 Denied Plaintiff 1.6 1/5/07 Invalidity Anticipation

193 1:05cv00747 Granted in Plaintiff 6.6 8/23/07 No Fraud-Denied; Preemption part, No Unfair Denied in Competition-Gran Part ted; No Equitable or Promissory Estoppel-Denied; No Implied License-Denied 1:06cv00091 Granted Plaintiff 3.4 11/20/07 Breach of Contract 1:06cv00091 Granted Plaintiff 3.4 11/20/07 Validity Anticipation 1:06cv00091 Denied Defendant 3.4 11/20/07 Incorporation by Reference 1:06cv00091 Denied Defendant 3.4 11/20/07 No Breach of Contract 1:06cv00557 Denied Plaintiff 7.4 9/29/08 Enforceability Inequitable Conduct without Prejudice 1:06cv00557 Denied Plaintiff 7.4 9/29/08 No Laches; No without Equitable Prejudice Estoppel; No Prosecution Laches 1:02cv01512 Denied Plaintiff 3.4 8/18/08 Relevant Market 1:02cv01512 Granted in Plaintiff 4.7 9/25/08 No Sham part, Litigation Denied in Part 1:06cv00414 Granted in Defendant 4.1 12/4/08 Validity Anticipation part, Denied in Part 1:99cv00904 Denied Defendant 3.3 8/17/01 Limitation on Lost Profits Damages 1:99cv00904 Granted Plaintiff 3.3 8/17/01 Validity Anticipation 1:06cv00028 Denied Plaintiff 1.4 11/5/08 Enforceability Inequitable Conduct without Prejudice 1:06cv00028 Denied Defendant 1.4 11/5/08 Laches; Equitable Failure to Mark without Estoppel; Prejudice Limitation on Damages 1:06cv00028 Denied Plaintiff 0.9 11/5/08 Validity 112 without Prejudice 1:06cv00282 Granted Plaintiff 6.1 4/28/09 Validity Anticipation; Obviousness 1:06cv00282 Granted Plaintiff 6.1 4/28/09 No License Implied 1:08cv00779 Denied Plaintiff 8.3 7/22/09 Collateral Estoppel; Res Judicata; Infringement 1:06cv00282 Denied Defendant 5.1 4/28/09 License Implied 1:07cv00272 Granted in Defendant 12.1 9/14/10 Invalidity Indefiniteness part, Denied in Part 1:07cv00333 Denied Defendant 4.1 1/20/10 Infringement Literal 1:07cv00826 Denied Defendant 2.6 3/5/10 Invalidity Indefiniteness 1:07cv00826 Granted Defendant 17.4 5/31/11 Invalidity 101; Subject Matter

1:07cv00826 Denied Defendant 2.6 3/5/10 Statute of 194 Limitations 1:08cv00292 Granted Plaintiff 3.6 10/19/10 Validity Best Mode 1:08cv00292 Granted Plaintiff 3.6 10/19/10 Validity Anticipation 1:08cv00292 Denied Plaintiff 3.6 10/19/10 Enforceability Inequitable Conduct 1:09cv00072 Denied Plaintiff 3.6 7/26/10 Enforceability Inequitable Conduct 1:08cv00292 Denied Plaintiff 3.6 10/19/10 Validity 35 USC 255 1:08cv00292 Granted Plaintiff 3.6 10/19/10 Validity Written Description 1:06cv00043 Granted in Plaintiff 5.0 3/9/11 Validity Indefiniteness-Denied; part, Anticipation-Denied; Denied in Obviousness-Granted Part 1:09cv00264 Granted Plaintiff 4.3 1/20/11 Validity Double Patenting 1:09cv00264 Granted Defendant 4.3 1/20/11 False Marking 1:10cv00315 Denied Defendant 2.8 4/13/11 Limitation on Reasonable Royalty; Date Damages of Hypothetical Negotiation 1:11cv00131 Denied Defendant 10.6 3/30/12 Res Judicata 1:09cv00627 Granted Plaintiff 3.6 1/24/12 Validity Anticipation 1:09cv00627 Granted in Defendant 3.6 1/24/12 Noninfringement part, Denied in Part 1:10cv00735 Denied Plaintiff 3.0 8/28/12 Infringement 1:10cv00039 Granted in Defendant 4.5 6/19/12 Patent Anticipation - Denied part, Exhaustion - Denied in Granted; Priority Part Date - Denied; Invalidity - Denied; Noninfringement - Granted 1:10cv00039 Granted Plaintiff 3.6 6/19/12 Validity Anticipation 1:10cv00258 Granted Plaintiff 5.8 11/8/12 Equitable Estoppel; Waiver; Prosecution History Estoppel 1:10cv00841 Denied Plaintiff 3.8 9/13/12 Infringement 1:10cv00841 Granted Defendant 3.8 9/13/12 Patent Exhaustion 1:10cv00841 Denied Defendant 3.8 9/13/12 Unfair Competition; Unclean Hands 1:10cv00841 Denied Plaintiff 3.1 9/13/12 No Patent Exhaustion 1:10cv00841 Denied Defendant 3.1 9/13/12 No Trademark Violation; No False Designation; No Trade Dress Violation; No Unfair Trade Practices; No False Advertising 1:10cv00841 Granted Plaintiff 3.1 9/13/12 No False Advertising 1:11cv00173 Denied Plaintiff 2.2 4/9/13 Validity Anticipation 1:13cv00576 Denied Plaintiff 3.3 7/26/13 Validity Enablement; Written Description; 102(g)(2) 1:11cv01007 Granted in Plaintiff 3.6 6/25/13 Infringement part, Denied in 195 Part 1:11cv01007 Denied Defendant 3.6 6/25/13 Invalidity Obviousness; Written Description; Enablement 1:11cv01007 Granted in Plaintiff 3.0 6/25/13 Validity Obviousness - Granted; part, Written Description - GIP; Denied in Enablement - GIP; Part Indefiniteness - Denied 1:11cv01007 Granted in Defendant 3.0 6/25/13 Noninfringement part, Denied in Part 1:10cv00503 Denied Plaintiff 3.5 9/9/13 Content of Prior Art 1:10cv00658 Granted in Defendant 5.6 1/13/14 License part, Denied in Part 1:10cv00658 Denied Defendant 5.6 1/13/14 Exhaustion 1:10cv00658 Granted Plaintiff 5.0 1/13/14 No Breach of Contract 1:10cv00658 Denied Plaintiff 5.0 1/13/14 No Exhaustion 1:10cv00658 Granted in Plaintiff 5.0 1/13/14 No License part, Denied in Part 1:10cv00658 Denied Plaintiff 5.0 1/13/14 Validity Anticipation; Indefiniteness 1:10cv00999 Denied Plaintiff 4.9 10/4/13 No License without Prejudice 1:10cv00999 Granted in Plaintiff 4.8 10/16/13 Validity Anticipation part, Denied in Part 1:11cv01258 Granted Plaintiff 5.6 2/6/14 Assignor Estoppel 1:12cv00282 Granted Defendant 3.4 5/14/14 Invalidity Indefiniteness; Enablement; Written Description 1:12cv00930 Denied Plaintiff 3.5 8/14/14 Validity Indefinitenss; Anticipation; Obviousness 1:08cv00889 Denied Defendant 1.8 8/14/14 Limitation on Lost Profits Damages 1:12cv00487 Granted Plaintiff 2.5 5/15/15 Invalidity Indefiniteness 1:12cv00569 Granted Plaintiff 2.5 2/4/15 Validity Anticipation 1:13cv00136 Granted Defendant 7.9 10/8/15 Invalidity 35 USC 101 1:13cv00136 Denied Plaintiff 7.3 10/8/15 Validity 35 USC 101 1:13cv00579 Granted Defendant 7.9 10/8/15 Invalidity 35 USC 101 1:13cv00579 Denied Plaintiff 7.3 10/8/15 Validity 35 USC 101 1:13cv00581 Granted Defendant 7.9 10/8/15 Invalidity 35 USC 101 1:13cv00581 Denied Plaintiff 7.3 10/8/15 Validity 35 USC 101 1:13cv00693 Granted Plaintiff 3.5 11/25/14 Validity; Not Anticipation; Functionality Exceptional Case 1:14cv00194 Granted Defendant 1.8 2/5/15 No Provisional Rights 1:11cv00908 Denied Defendant 1.4 2/24/15 Invalidity 101; Indefiniteness 1:12cv00487 Granted in Plaintiff 7.6 3/21/16 Noninfringement Literal - Granted; DOE - part, Denied without prejudice Denied in Part 1:13cv01534 Denied Defendant 5.7 4/11/16 Invalidity; Laches; Anticipation; Obviousness196 Noninfringement 1:13cv01534 Granted in Plaintiff 4.8 4/11/16 Content of Prior part, Art Denied in Part 1:10cv00258 Denied Defendant 2.6 7/21/16 Limitation on Damages 1:13cv00453 Granted in Plaintiff 5.0 12/19/16 No Available Anticipation; Obviousness part, Noninfringing Denied in Alternatives Part (Denied); Validity (Denied); Reference Estoppel (GIP) 1:13cv00685 Granted Defendant 5.1 1/19/17 Noninfringement Collateral Estoppel 1:13cv02072 Granted in Plaintiff 4.4 2/22/17 Validity 102(a) (Granted); part, Obviousness (Granted); Denied in 102(g) Denied) Part 1:13cv02073 Denied Defendant 4.1 2/22/17 No Willfulness 1:14cv01482 Denied Plaintiff 3.4 3/28/17 Validity Anticipation

197 Temporary Restraining Order Motion There were 6 Temporary Restraining Order Motion contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 50.0%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 2.9. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing. Distribution of Decisions by Month For Temporary Restraining Order Motion 4

3.5

3

2.5

2 4

1.5

Number of Decisions 1

0.5 1 1

0 1 2 13 Month of Litigation from Motion Filing The supporting data is shown below.

Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision 1:02cv00332 Granted Plaintiff 1.1 6/7/02 1:05cv00356 Denied Plaintiff 0.0 8/27/08 1:09md02118 Granted Plaintiff 0.3 5/24/11 1:11cv00271 Denied Plaintiff 0.5 8/26/13 1:14cv01268 Granted Plaintiff 0.1 10/9/14 1:16cv00171 Denied Plaintiff 15.1 7/12/17 without Prejudice

198 Transfer Motion There were 81 Transfer Motion contested decisions by Judge Robinson. The overall contested win rate on these motions was 29.0%. The average time (in months) from motion filing to decision was 5.3. The distribution of time to decision for the first 12 months of motion pendency is shown below, with any motions remaining pendency after 12 months lumped into month "13". Months with no decisions are not included in the chart. Note that the first month includes all decisions occurring less than 1 month from motion filing.

Distribution of Decisions by Month For Transfer Motion 18

16

14

12

10 17 8 15 6 11 Number of Decisions 4 7 6 5 2 4 4 3 3 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Month of Litigation from Motion Filing The supporting data is shown below.

Case Number Decision Movant Pendency Date of Decision 1:00cv00457 Granted Defendant 5.0 2/28/01 1:01cv00199 Denied Defendant 5.3 11/28/01 1:01cv00203 Denied Defendant 5.1 11/9/01 1:01cv00692 Denied Defendant 5.3 5/1/02 1:02cv00471 Granted Defendant 4.8 1/22/03 1:02cv01336 Granted Defendant 5.1 1/23/03 1:03cv00364 Denied Defendant 1.8 8/4/03 1:03cv00398 Granted Defendant 4.8 12/2/03 1:03cv00983 Denied Defendant 5.2 5/24/04 1:03cv01158 Denied Defendant 1.2 4/20/04 1:04cv00067 Denied Defendant 3.7 8/27/04 1:04cv00852 Denied Defendant 5.3 3/31/05 1:04cv00918 Denied Defendant 5.7 2/15/05 without Prejudice 1:04cv01199 Denied Defendant 5.9 4/13/05 1:04cv01199 Denied Defendant 5.9 4/13/05 1:04cv01293 Denied Defendant 4.1 2/15/05 without Prejudice 1:04cv01423 Granted Plaintiff 1.2 1/6/05 1:04cv01451 Denied Defendant 1.7 2/18/05 without Prejudice 1:04cv01451 Granted Defendant 1.7 6/3/05 1:05cv00201 Denied Defendant 2.4 9/13/05 199 1:05cv00357 Granted Defendant 3.3 10/26/05 1:97cv00049 Denied Defendant 4.6 3/22/00 1:05cv00853 Denied Defendant 5.1 6/22/06 1:06cv00414 Denied Defendant 6.9 3/26/07 1:00cv01013 Granted in Plaintiff 9.7 9/30/02 part, Denied in Part 1:05cv00816 Denied Defendant 3.4 6/15/06 1:06cv00495 Denied Defendant 6.9 3/26/07 1:07cv00038 Granted Defendant 7.5 9/10/07 1:07cv00333 Denied Defendant 1.2 1/25/08 1:07cv00348 Denied Defendant 1.2 1/25/08 1:07cv00409 Denied Defendant 1.2 1/25/08 1:07cv00671 Denied Defendant 3.0 4/17/08 1:07cv00765 Denied Defendant 1.2 1/25/08 1:08cv00016 Granted Defendant 0.4 2/27/08 1:08cv00104 Granted Defendant 4.9 8/26/08 1:06cv00197 Denied Defendant 0.4 5/21/08 1:08cv00290 Denied Defendant 6.2 2/18/09 1:08cv00838 Granted Defendant 1.9 2/24/09 1:09cv00022 Denied Defendant 1.9 4/2/09 1:06cv00495 Granted Defendant 4.1 11/3/09 1:10cv00176 Granted Defendant 6.1 1/3/11 1:09cv00872 Granted Defendant 2.7 4/6/10 1:10cv00419 Granted Defendant 7.9 3/31/11 1:10cv00595 Denied Defendant 6.8 6/8/11 1:10cv00869 Denied Defendant 6.3 6/8/11 1:10cv00902 Denied Defendant 4.2 6/8/11 1:10cv01099 Granted Defendant 4.0 6/16/11 1:10cv00999 Denied Defendant 2.7 7/28/11 1:11cv00173 Denied Defendant 12.8 5/3/12 1:11cv00598 Denied Defendant 9.5 8/16/12 1:11cv00623 Denied Defendant 11.9 8/28/12 1:10cv00735 Denied Defendant 4.6 5/3/12 1:11cv01000 Denied Defendant 19.4 7/19/13 1:11cv01061 Granted Defendant 5.0 6/7/12 1:12cv00372 Denied Defendant 4.0 8/20/12 1:11cv01254 Denied Defendant 11.3 2/13/13 1:12cv00614 Denied Defendant 9.5 3/27/13 1:12cv00487 Denied Defendant 8.6 3/27/13 1:12cv00931 Denied Defendant 8.0 5/16/13 1:10cv01028 Denied Defendant 5.5 5/15/12 1:12cv00613 Denied Defendant 9.6 3/27/13 1:12cv01066 Granted Defendant 7.2 5/16/13 1:12cv01427 Denied Defendant 4.5 6/4/13 1:14cv00874 Denied Defendant 11.7 7/22/15 1:14cv01483 Denied Defendant 5.5 7/8/15 200 1:15cv00260 Denied Defendant 4.0 8/6/15 1:15cv00218 Denied Defendant 7.4 1/12/16 1:15cv00486 Denied Defendant 2.4 9/10/15 1:15cv00427 Denied Defendant 4.7 3/22/16 1:15cv00647 Denied Defendant 6.1 4/25/16 1:15cv00808 Granted Defendant 4.7 4/25/16 1:15cv00808 Granted Defendant 6.0 4/25/16 1:15cv01031 Denied Defendant 2.3 2/29/16 1:15cv00856 Denied Defendant 5.3 9/2/16 1:15cv01123 Granted Defendant 0.6 4/13/16 1:16cv00197 Denied Defendant 9.0 2/14/17 1:16cv00290 Denied Defendant 10.4 3/29/17 1:16cv00367 Granted Defendant 9.2 3/16/17 1:16cv00056 Denied Defendant 4.2 10/19/16 1:16cv01176 Granted Defendant 5.9 8/2/17 1:12cv00487 Denied Defendant 5.5 8/28/17

201