Comparative Rumen and Fecal Diet Microhistological Deter- Minations of European Mouflon
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Insects of Macquarie Island. Introduction1
Pacific Insects 4 (4) : 905-915 December, 15, 1962 INSECTS OF MACQUARIE ISLAND. INTRODUCTION1 By J. Linsley Gressitt BISHOP MUSEUM, HONOLULU Abstract: Collections of land arthropods were made on Macquarie Island by J. L. Gres sitt and J. H. Calaby, 4-10 December 1960, and by Keith Watson, December 1960-Decem- ber 1961. This paper is a brief discussion of the geography and environment of Macquarie, introductory to the systematic papers describing the fauna. Watson, of the Australian Na tional Antarctic Research Expeditions, will later publish his general ecological studies, when the species are all identified. INTRODUCTION This paper is a brief description of the geography and environment of Macquarie Is land, as related to land arthropods. It is presented by way of introduction to the series of reports by various specialists on the land arthropod fauna of the island. The bulk of these reports immediately follow this article. (One Macquarie mite is discussed in the third of the preceding articles by Wallwork on Antarctic mites, and another is mentioned in his second article.) Others will appear in later issues, when they are completed. After publication of the bulk of these taxonomic reports, Keith Watson will publish his general report on the land arthropod fauna of Macquarie, incorporating his ecological studies on the fauna. Through the kindness of Mr. P. G. Law, Director of the Antarctic Division, Australian Department of External Affairs, I was permitted to join the Australian National Antarctic Research Expedition for the annual resupply trip to Macquarie Island in early December 1960. The operation, supported by the chartered Danish ice-breaker Magga Dan, was car ried on at Macquarie from 4th to lOth December. -
New Zealand Rushes: Juncus Factsheets
New Zealand Rushes: Juncus factsheets K. Bodmin, P. Champion, T. James and T. Burton www.niwa.co.nz Acknowledgements: Our thanks to all those who contributed photographs, images or assisted in the formulation of the factsheets, particularly Aarti Wadhwa (graphics) at NIWA. This project was funded by TFBIS, the Terrestrial and Freshwater Biodiversity information System (TFBIS) Programme. TFBIS is funded by the Government to help New Zealand achieve the goals of the New Zealand Biodiversity Strategy and is administered by the Department of Conservation (DOC). All photographs are by Trevor James (AgResearch), Kerry A. Bodmin or Paul D. Rushes: Champion (NIWA) unless otherwise stated. Additional images and photographs were kindly provided by Allan Herbarium; Auckland Herbarium; Larry Allain (USGS, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center); Forest and Kim Starr; Donald Cameron (Go Botany Juncus website); and Tasmanian Herbarium (Threatened Species Section, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Tasmania). factsheets © 2015 - NIWA. All rights Reserved. Cite as: Bodmin KA, Champion PD, James T & Burton T (2015) New Zealand Rushes: Juncus factsheets. NIWA, Hamilton. Introduction Rushes (family Juncaceae) are a common component of New Zealand wetland vegetation and species within this family appear very similar. With over 50 species, Juncus are the largest component of the New Zealand rushes and are notoriously difficult for amateurs and professionals alike to identify to species level. This key and accompanying factsheets have been developed to enable users with a diverse range of botanical expertise to identify Juncus to species level. The best time for collection, survey or identification is usually from December to April as mature fruiting material is required to distinguish between species. -
ACT, Australian Capital Territory
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations. -
Germination Studies Showed a Warm Day/Cold Night Regime to Be the Most Effective
SOME STUDIES ON THE GENUS ACAENA A thesis presented to the Faculty of Science and Engineering in the University of Birmingham by DAVID WINSTON HARRIS WALTON in supplication for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. September, 1974. University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. 09CC/.6 "The inner parts of the Country South Georgia was not less savage and horrible: the Wild rocks raised their lofty summits till they were lost in the Clouds and the Vallies laid buried in everlasting Snow. Not a tree or shrub was to be seen, no not even big enough to make a toothpick. I landed in three different places, displayed our Colours and took possession of the Country in his Majestys name under a descharge of small arms. Our Botanists found here only three plants, the one is a coarse strong bladed grass which grows in tufts, Wild Burnet and a Plant like Moss which grows on the rocks". The Journals of Captain Cook : vol. 2 - The Voyage of the Resolution and Adventure in 1772-1775. Cambridge University Press (1961). -
THE ALPINE FLORA of TIERRA DEL FUEGO by D. M. MOORE
Anal. Inst. Bot. Cavanilles 32 (2): 419-440 (1975) THE ALPINE FLORA OF TIERRA DEL FUEGO by D. M. MOORE This paper is dedicated to Prof. S, Rivas Goday on his 70th birthday. Introduction Since the first known collection of Fuegian plants, made along^ the NW coast of Tierra del Fuego by George Handisyd in 1690 (More- ton-Middleton, 1909; Gunckel, 1971), more than 200 collectors have contributed to our knowledge of the flora of this region (Moore and Goodall, unpub.). Because of the importance of shipborne expeditions, most of the earlier studies were confined to coastal areas and fuller information on the interior did not become available until the expe ditions of Nordenskjold (Dusen, 1900), Skottsberg (1916) and Roivai- nen (1954) during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Since then there has, of course, been a continued accumulation of data on the flora and vegetation of Tierra del Fuego so that now, although many problems remain, the general characteristics are fairly clear. The mountainous regions of Tierra del Fuego are generally difficult of access and have uncertain and inclement weather so that even today many parts have not been visited by botanists. However, the travels of Alboff (1896, 1897), Dusen (1900), Gusinde (Skottsberg, 1926) and Skottsberg (1916) served to outline the general features of the alpine flora and these have been confirmed and amplified by more recent studies (Godley, 1960; Moore, 1969, 1970, 1971, etc; Moore and Goodall, 1973, 1974, etc.). In consequence, despite the inevitable lacunae in our knowledge, it seems appropriate to summarize current information on the alpine flora of Tierra del Fuego and this paper represents the first such attempt since that of Skottsberg (1916). -
Juncus Scheuchzerioides
Juncus scheuchzerioides SYNONYMS Juncus inconspicuus D Urv., J. scheuchzerioides var. inconspicuus (D Urv.) Hook.f. FAMILY Juncaceae AUTHORITY Juncus scheuchzerioides Gaudich. FLORA CATEGORY Vascular – Native ENDEMIC TAXON No ENDEMIC GENUS No Campbell Island. Photographer: Geoff Rogers ENDEMIC FAMILY No STRUCTURAL CLASS Rushes & Allied Plants CURRENT CONSERVATION STATUS 2012 | At Risk – Naturally Uncommon | Qualifiers: RR, SO PREVIOUS CONSERVATION STATUSES 2009 | At Risk – Naturally Uncommon | Qualifiers: SO 2004 | Range Restricted DISTRIBUTION Indigenous. Antipodes, Auckland, Campbell Islands. Also Macquarie, Falkland, South Georgia, Marion, Crozet and Kerguelen Islands. Present in South America HABITAT Sea level to 300 m a.s.l. Usually in or near running water or in open peaty turf. FEATURES Densely tufted, dark green, red green or bright green perennial. Stems 20-200 x 0.2-0.5 mm. erect, densely branched from base, often creeping. Basal nodes sending out fibrous roots. Leaves numerous, basal and cauline, 10-200 x 0.5-1.0 mm, » stems, herbaceous, narrow-linear, compressed, transversely septate, pale green, red green or bright green, leaf apex acute; sheath long, membranous, bearing two obtuse auricles. Inflorescence a simple compact head of 2-8 flowers, very rarely producing a second head. Flowers 4 mm long, tepals more or less equal, the outer acuminate, the inner ovate-oblong, obtuse or shortly acuminate, light green or light brown. Stamens 6, more or less equal in length to tepals. Capsules < or > tepals, ovoid, shortly mucronate, light brown or red-brown. SIMILAR TAXA Could be confused with J. pusillus Buch. which also grows on the Auckland Islands with J. scheuchzerioides. Juncus pusillus differs in terete rather than compressed leaves; flowers 1.5-3.0 mm rather than c.4 mm long; and leaves which are < rather than > 0.5 mm long. -
'Weeds by Nature': the Plants of Macquarie Island
Twelfth Australian Weeds Conference ‘WEEDS BY NATURE’: THE PLANTS OF MACQUARIE ISLAND Mark Fountain, Alan Macfadyen, Natalie Papworth and Jim Cane Royal Tasmanian Botanical Gardens, Queens Domain, Hobart, Tas. 7000 Abstract Subantarctic Macquarie Island is a small, which the annual temperature varies little from the very isolated island in the Southern Ocean 1500 km mean of 4.8°C, rain falls nearly every day but there is south-southeast of Tasmania. It is a relatively young little persistent snow. Westerly winds predominate, landmass, emerging from the sea between 200,000 and frequently reach gale force for prolonged periods, and 90,000 years ago, and like other subantarctic islands cloud covers the island for most of the year. only has a small number (41 species) of flowering SOIL DYNAMICS plants. All species on the island have travelled there by long distance dispersal, often showing biogeo- The key characteristic of Macquarie Island soil is that graphical links to the other subantarctic islands and of instability, and the two factors of seismic activity land masses to the west and north. Many could be and gravity interplay here. Earthquakes 6.2 on the characterised as obligate colonisers or ‘weeds by na- Richter scale or stronger occur at least annually (Jones ture’ since they come from ‘weedy’ genera with cos- and McCue 1988), and are responsible for mass move- mopolitan distributions such as Galium, Epilobium, ment in the form of landslips typified in the ridgetop Cardamine and Stellaria. peatbeds (Selkirk et al. 1988). The steep slopes ex- posed to the constant rain and wind are susceptible to The island’s soils are essentially skeletal at high alti- gradual downward movement, aided on a more local tude or highly organic loam or peat at low altitude. -
Studies on Colombian Grasses (Poaceae): Twenty Chorological Novelties
www.unal.edu.co/icn/publicaciones/caldasia.htm Caldasia 27(1):131-145.García 2005et al. ESTUDIOS EN GRAMÍNEAS (POACEAE) DE COLOMBIA: VEINTE NOVEDADES COROLÓGICAS 1 Studies on Colombian grasses (Poaceae): Twenty chorological novelties JOHN ALEJANDRO GARCÍA-ULLOA Departamento de Biología, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Ciudad Universitaria, Bogotá D. C., Colombia. [email protected], [email protected] CAMILO LASTRA CÉSAR SALAS Herbario de la Facultad de Agronomía “HFAB”, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Ciudad Universitaria, Bogotá D. C., [email protected], ecocambiol@yahoo. es; [email protected], [email protected] MÓNICA MEDINA MERCHÁN Departamento de Biología-Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Apartado 7495, Bogotá D. C., Colombia. [email protected] RESUMEN Se dan a conocer veinte novedades para la flora de Colombia: Agrostis mertensii, Agrostis perennans, Agrostis stolonifera, Agrostis subrepens, Agrostis tolucensis, Aristida schiedeana, Arundo donax, Bouteloua aristidoides, Bouteloua simplex, Cenchrus ciliaris, Cortaderia selloana, Cynodon dactylon, Cynodon nlemfuensis, Heteropogon contortus, Microchloa kunthii, Paspalidium geminatum, Pharus parvifolius, Tragus berteronianus, Urochloa distachya y Zoysia matrella. Se presentan la distribución geográfica, las preferencias ecológicas, los nombres comunes, los usos y las afinidades morfológicas para cada una de las especies. Asimismo, se excluyen de la flora de Colombia las siguientes especies: Agrostis araucana (= Agrostis magellanica), -
The Vegetation Communities Macquarie Island Vegetation
Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark The Vegetation Communities Macquarie Island vegetation Pleurophyllum hookeri Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark 1 Macquarie Island vegetation Community (Code) Page Coastal slope complex (QCS) 4 Coastal terrace mosaic (QCT) 6 Kelp beds (QKB) 8 Macquarie alpine mosaic (QAM) 10 Mire (QMI) 12 Short tussock grassland/rushland with herbs (QST) 14 Tall tussock grassland with megaherbs (QTT) 16 General description the surface and is part of its identified value as a World Heritage Area. The vegetation mapping of Macquarie Island was prepared by P.M. Selkirk and D.A. Adamson in 1998 All of the vegetation of Macquarie Island is and is based on vegetation structure rather than herbaceous, with no woody species present. community composition. Vegetation categories Megaherbs are a distinctive and unique feature of indicate foliage density and foliage height, similar to the sub-Antarctic, occurring nowhere else in the scheme of Specht (Specht et al. 1995). Using Tasmania. There are two megaherbs on Macquarie Specht’s classes, ‘closed vegetation’ equates to Island – Stilbocarpa polaris (Macquarie Island foliage projective cover >70%; and ‘open vegetation’ cabbage) and Pleurophyllum hookeri. In tall tussock equates to foliage projective cover <70%. ‘Tall grasslands dominated by Poa foliosa, there are often vegetation’ describes vegetation where the foliage swathes of Stilbocarpa polaris. stands higher than 0.4 to 0.5m above the ground, The vegetation communities that make up the while ‘short vegetation’ has foliage <0.4m high. Coastal terrace mosaic are much more widespread Seven structural vegetation types have been than currently mapped. Components of this mosaic identified in the mapping of Macquarie Island (mire, herbland, tall grassland, bryophytes, lakes, vegetation. -
Spatial Distribution, Habitat Preference and Colonization Status of Two Alien Terrestrial Invertebrate Species in Antarctica KEVIN A
Antarctic Science 22(3), 221–231 (2010) & Antarctic Science Ltd 2010 doi:10.1017/S0954102009990770 Spatial distribution, habitat preference and colonization status of two alien terrestrial invertebrate species in Antarctica KEVIN A. HUGHES* and M. ROGER WORLAND* British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK [email protected] Abstract: The introduction of invasive species is one of the greatest threats to Earth’s biodiversity, as they can reduce native biodiversity and alter ecosystem structure and function. Currently, the only two known non-native terrestrial invertebrates in Antarctica are the chironomid midge Eretmoptera murphyi and the enchytraeid worm Christensenidrilus blocki. These invertebrates were probably introduced to ground near Signy Research Station, South Orkney Islands, during transplantation experiments in the late 1960s. Between 2007 and 2009, this study surveyed the area around the introduction site for midge larvae and worms to assess any change over the last four decades in their spatial distribution, habitat preference and colonization status. Eretmoptera murphyi was found in concentrations up to 4.1 3 105 larvae m-2 (mean 2.1 3 104 larvae m-2) at distances of up to 220 m from the probable introduction site (c. 35 000 m2), while C. blocki was only found close to the introduction site in low numbers. Significantly more E. murphyi larvae were found in peat and dead organic material (3.34 3 104 m-2) than in stony soil and gravel (1.52 3 104 m-2) or living moss and other plant material (1.16 3 104 m-2). Eretmoptera murphyi can no longer be considered a persistent alien as it clearly expanding its distribution, while C. -
South, Tasmania
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Guide to Users Background What is the summary for and where does it come from? This summary has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. It highlights important elements of the biodiversity of the region in two ways: • Listing species which may be significant for management because they are found only in the region, mainly in the region, or they have a conservation status such as endangered or vulnerable. • Comparing the region to other parts of Australia in terms of the composition and distribution of its species, to suggest components of its biodiversity which may be nationally significant. The summary was produced using the Australian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. The list of families covered in ANHAT is shown in Appendix 1. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are are not not included included in the in the summary. • The data used for this summary come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. -
The Spatial Distribution of Alien and Invasive Vascular Plant Species on Sub-Antarctic Marion Island
The spatial distribution of alien and invasive vascular plant species on sub-Antarctic Marion Island by Tshililo Ramaswiela Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Botany) at Stellenbosch University Department of Botany and Zoology Faculty of Science Supervisor: Prof. Steven L. Chown Co-supervisor: Dr. Justine D. Shaw December 2010 DECLARATION By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the owner of the copyright thereof (unless to the extent explicitly otherwise stated) and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: September 2010 Copyright © 2010 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved i ABSTRACT The patterns of spread of non-indigenous species and the factors influencing their distribution have been studied infrequently on Southern Ocean Islands, where the prevention and control of biological invasions is a priority for conservation management. Owing to its remoteness and relatively small size, sub-Antarctic Marion Island provides an ideal opportunity to investigate the patterns of spread of invasive species and the factors likely influencing the distribution of alien species. Therefore, this study provides a spatially explicit documentation of the alien and invasive vascular plant species on Marion Island, the change in their distribution patterns through time, an assessment of the correlates of the current distributions, documentation of species rich areas, and provides recommendations for control based on these data and life history data available for each species. To ensure comprehensive coverage for the current estimate of distributions, a combination of a systematic (spatially explicit) survey and an ad hoc data collection method was used to examine the abundance and occupancy of each alien plant species across the island.