DOCSLIB.ORG

European PROGRES Final Report, May 2014-March 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
European PROGRES Final Report, May 2014-March 2018 0 Overall objective: To contribute to sustainable development of the South East and South West Serbia through improved coordination between national and local authorities, more favourable environment for employability, business and infrastructure growth, and enhanced good governance and social inclusion. Purpose: Enhanced local governance, improved conditions for infrastructure development, better planning and management capacities, advanced business enabling environment, as well as supporting the development of social inclusion and employment policies. Total budget: 24.46 million Euros - European Union provides 19.6 million Euros and the Government of Switzerland 4.86 million Euros 17.46 million Euros - implemented by the United Nations Office for Project Services – UNOPS Seven million Euros - implemented through the Ministry of Finance’s Department for Contracting and Financing of EU Funded Programmes Start date: 8 May 2014 End date: 30 March 2018 Programme coverage: Novi Pazar, Ivanjica, Nova Varoš, Priboj, Prijepolje, Raška, Sjenica and Tutin, in the South West Serbia Prokuplje, Blace, Žitorađa, Kuršumlija in Toplica District Leskovac, Bojnik, Vlasotince, Lebane, Medveđa and Crna Trava in Jablanica District Vranje, Bosilegrad, Bujanovac, Vladičin Han, Preševo, Surdulica and Trgovište in Pčinja District Brus in Rasinska District Aleksinac, Gadžin Han, Doljevac, Merošina and Svrljig in Niški District Babušnica, Bela Palanka in Pirotski District Knjaževac in Zaječarski District. Donors: The European Union The Government of Switzerland The Government of the Republic of Serbia Implementing partner: United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS) Report date: 28 September 2018 Period covered: 8 May 2014 – 30 March 2018 1 Table of Contents ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................................. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 4 REVIEW OF PROGRESS AND PERFORMANCE ................................................................................. 6 POLICY AND PROGRAMME CONTEXT PROGRESS .................................................................................... 6 PROGRESS TOWARDS ACHIEVING OBJECTIVES ...................................................................................... 9 PROGRESS TOWARDS ACHIEVING RESULTS ........................................................................................ 12 Result 1 ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Result 1 – Activities ...................................................................................................................... 16 Result 2 ......................................................................................................................................... 21 Result 2 – Activities ...................................................................................................................... 25 Result 3 ......................................................................................................................................... 32 Result 3 – Activities ...................................................................................................................... 35 Result 4 ......................................................................................................................................... 40 Result 4 - Activities ....................................................................................................................... 41 MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION ......................................................................................... 44 CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENTS .................................................................................................... 44 PROGRAMME STEERING COMMITTEE .............................................................................................. 44 FINANCE................................................................................................................................... 45 HUMAN RESOURCES ................................................................................................................... 45 PROCUREMENT AND GRANTS ........................................................................................................ 46 LOGISTICS ................................................................................................................................. 46 REPORTING ............................................................................................................................... 47 MONITORING ............................................................................................................................ 47 ASSUMPTIONS AND RISKS .......................................................................................................... 47 ASSUMPTIONS ........................................................................................................................... 47 RISKS AND ISSUES ....................................................................................................................... 48 QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ................................................................................................... 49 QUALITY .................................................................................................................................. 49 SUSTAINABILITY ......................................................................................................................... 50 LESSONS LEARNED ..................................................................................................................... 53 LFM – PROGRESS AGAINST INDICATORS IN LOGICAL FRAMEWORK MATRIX ................................ 56 2 Acronyms ACES Association of Consulting Engineers of Serbia APG Agricultural Producer Group AoR Area of Responsibility CAS Citizens’ Advisory Services CB The Government of Serbia Coordination Body for Preševo, Bujanovac, and Medveđa CIP Capital Investment Plan CFCU Department for Contracting and Financing of EU Funded Programmes CFP Call for Proposal CIF Citizens’ Involvement Fund CSO Civil Society Organisation DEU Delegation of the European Union EU European Union FIDIC The International Federation of Consulting Engineers GEM Gender Equality Mechanism GG Good Governance GI Geographical Indication GoS Government of Serbia HR Human Rights LSG Local Self Government MESTD Ministry of Education, Science, and Technological Development MEI Ministry of European Integration MCTI Ministry of Construction, Transport, and Infrastructure MSE Micro and Small Enterprises MSP Managing Successful Programmes MTTT Ministry of Trade, Tourism and Telecommunications MPALSG Ministry of Public Administration and Local Self-government (MPALSG) NGO Non-governmental Organisation PPF5 Project Preparation Facility 5 PPP Public Private Partnership PRINCE 2 Projects in Controlled Environment PB Programme Budget PSC Programme Steering Committee RFP Request for Proposals RSOC UNOPS Serbia Operations Centre SCTM Standing Conference of Towns and Municipalities SME Small and Medium Size Enterprises SEIO European Integration Office of the Government of the Republic of Serbia SIPRU Social Inclusion and Poverty Reduction Unit SME Small and Medium Enterprise TA Technical Assistance ToR Terms of Reference UN Women United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women USAID United States Agency for International Development 3 Executive summary Although the South East and South West Serbia remain less developed parts of the country, the development programme European PROGRES facilitated improvements and established solid foundation for accelerated economic growth of the area. With funding support of the European Union and the Government of Switzerland, while contributing to implementation of national policies at the local level, this Programme from May 2014 to March 2018 encompassed implementation of 254 projects that contributed to local governance, business enabling environment, infrastructure development, and social inclusion in 34 municipalities that were covered by the Action. Work on local governance produced tangible results: management of municipal finances has been enhanced through implementation of 16 grants for update of taxpayers’ registries that enabled beneficiary Local Self-governments (LSGs) to increase tax revenue by 1.35 million Euros; provision of technical assistance for programme budgeting and capital investment planning enabled 15 beneficiary LSGs to improve identification and development of capital projects, enhance access to donors’ funds, while ensuring stronger citizens’ participation in the budgeting process. LSGs’ good governance (GG) capacities have been strengthened: 23 municipalities established GG Competence Centres that will address GG issues in local policies and projects; 13 LSGs conducted reforms that included development and adoption of 21 regulations to strengthen internal planning, accountability mechanisms, public property and human resource management; 27 municipal representatives completed GG capacity building programmes; and, finally, two publications on GG, which provide insight into practices that may be useful for future GG work have been published. European PROGRES supported development of 36 detailed regulation plans (DRPs)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Republic of Serbia Ipard Programme for 2014-2020
    EN ANNEX Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Republic of Serbia REPUBLIC OF SERBIA IPARD PROGRAMME FOR 2014-2020 27th June 2019 1 List of Abbreviations AI - Artificial Insemination APSFR - Areas with Potential Significant Flood Risk APV - The Autonomous Province of Vojvodina ASRoS - Agricultural Strategy of the Republic of Serbia AWU - Annual work unit CAO - Competent Accrediting Officer CAP - Common Agricultural Policy CARDS - Community Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and Stabilisation CAS - Country Assistance Strategy CBC - Cross border cooperation CEFTA - Central European Free Trade Agreement CGAP - Code of Good Agricultural Practices CHP - Combined Heat and Power CSF - Classical swine fever CSP - Country Strategy Paper DAP - Directorate for Agrarian Payment DNRL - Directorate for National Reference Laboratories DREPR - Danube River Enterprise Pollution Reduction DTD - Dunav-Tisa-Dunav Channel EAR - European Agency for Reconstruction EC - European Commission EEC - European Economic Community EU - European Union EUROP grid - Method of carcass classification F&V - Fruits and Vegetables FADN - Farm Accountancy Data Network FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization FAVS - Area of forest available for wood supply FOWL - Forest and other wooded land FVO - Food Veterinary Office FWA - Framework Agreement FWC - Framework Contract GAEC - Good agriculture and environmental condition GAP - Gross Agricultural Production GDP - Gross Domestic Product GEF - Global Environment Facility GEF - Global Environment Facility GES
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Program and Plan for The
    PROGRAM AND PLAN FOR THE SOLUTION OF THE CRISIS IN PRESEVO, BUJANOVAC AND MEDVEDJA MUNICIPALITIES Annex 5: Agreement on the solution of the crisis in Bujanovac, Presevo and Medvedja municipalities This Agreement is concluded between: The Governments of the Republic of Serbia and of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and The Albanian ethnic community in the municipalities of Presevo, Bujanovac and Medvedja. The implementation of this Agreement is supported and in the framework of the Joint Commission guaranteed by the international community, under the auspices of the United Nations. 1. The subject of this Agreement is the solution of the crisis in the municipalities of Presevo, Bujanovac, and Medvedja, in a peaceful way. 2. The Parties to the Agreement agree that the common objectives for the solution of the crisis are: a) The establishment of the respect of the constitutional-legal order, i.e. of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Republic of Serbia and of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia on that part of their territory, and the assurance of full normalization of work of the organs of the state, of the organs of local self-government and of other legal organs in that territory; b) The establishment of full personal security and security of property of all citizens and of full and undisturbed freedom of their movement in all parts of the territory of these municipalities, which shall be assured by the complete disbanding and disarmament of the extremists, by the restoration of security and peace in the region, and by making possible the return of all citizens - refugees to their households; c) The development of multiethnic and multiconfessional society based on democratic principles with the respect of all human, political and minority rights and liberties according to the highest standards; d) Prosperous and rapid economic and social development of the region with international financial assistance in the best interest of all citizens who live in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • EU PROGRES Newsletter, January-March 2013, Issue 9
    JANUARY-MARCH 2013 European Partnership with Municipalities The project funded through EU PROGRES enabled medical examinations to the women from the most vulnerable groups in Lebane. When medical doctor appears at your door, and at the time you do not have money for basic needs, not even for medication, it clearly shows what a great impact is achieved. Biljana Nikolić Centre for Democratic Activities Lebane Andrew Headey from the Delegation of EU and Branko Budimir from the Serbian European Integration Office mark the completion of project equipping the Kindergarten in Ivanjica Towns and Municipalities from South and South West Serbia in the “Europe, That Is You” Campaign Representatives of the Delegation of the European Union to Serbia, the Serbian European Integration Office and the European Partnership with Municipalities Programme - EU PROGRES informed mayors and presidents of municipalities in South and South West Serbia that the level of donations to be granted in the coming period depended on their capabilities, and that it was necessary therefore to upgrade the capacities of the administrations to offer the best response to EU integration challenges. Mayors and presidents of municipalities from 25 towns and municipalities gathered during a working lunch, on the occasion of launching the “Europe, That Is You“ campaign. > whole article EU PROGRES Activities to Go On Until March 2014 European Partnership with Municipalities Programme EU PROGES, implemented in 25 municipalities in South and Southwest Serbia with financial support from the European Union and the Government of Switzerland, will continue with implementation until March 2014 as announced at the tenth Programme Steering Committee Meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Characteristics of Market Production of Fruit and Grapes in Serbia
    REGIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MARKET PRODUCTION OF FRUIT AND GRAPES IN SERBIA Original scientific paper Economics of Agriculture 1/2018 UDC: 913:[346.54:641.13+634.8.076](497.11) doi:10.5937/ekoPolj1801201S REGIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MARKET PRODUCTION OF FRUIT AND GRAPES IN SERBIA1 Simo Stevanović2, Snežana Stevanović 3, Svjetlana Janković-Šoja4 Summary In the paper analyzes the trends in the development of market production of fruit (on the example of the apple and the plum) and grapes in Serbia from 1976 to 2015. The grouping of the Serbian districts according to the degree of the market production of fruit and grapes in 2015 was performed by a cluster analysis, on the basis of the six features of production, five features of the capacities, and five features of development. According to the data for 2015, the degree of the marketability of apples in Serbia was 47.7%, plums 15.9%, and grapes 18.3%. The Serbia-North Region shows a surplus in the production of apples, and a deficit in the production of plums (-181.7%) and grapes (-99.1%). The Serbia-South Region has a surplus in the production of the analyzed kinds of fruit (the apple accounting for 43.0%, and the plum 50.9%) and grapes (45.2%). Keywords: market production of fruit, economic development, I-distance, cluster analysis JEL: Q-13, O-11 Introduction Serbia is a traditionally significant producer of all kinds of continental fruit and grapes. Given the commercial, technological and nutritive characteristics of fruit production, 1 The paper is part of the research conducted on the “Serbia’s Rural Labor Market and Rural Economy – Income Diversification and Poverty Reduction” Project, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Extreme July Precipitation and Its Consequences on Crna Trava Municipality, Serbia
    Researches Reviews of the Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management 48-2/2019 Original scientific article UDC 551.577.37(497.11 Crna Trava) EXTREME JULY PRECIPITATION AND ITS CONSEQUENCES ON CRNA TRAVA MUNICIPALITY, SERBIA Marijana PetrovićA,B*, Renata FeketeA,B, Miloš OstojićA,B, Milica G. RadakovićA,B Received: September 12, 2019 | Accepted: December 27, 2019 DOI: 10.5937/ZbDght1902112P ABSTRACT: Even though climate variability, geology, and human activity are main trig- gers of landslides, based on earlier research, precipitation is considered the most impor- tant natural factor responsible for soil erosion in the landslide context. In this study land- slide activation has been correlated with precipitation in least developed municipality of Crna Trava located in South-east Serbia. The purpose of this study is analyzing the precip- itation in thirteen surrounding settlements: Vranje, Leskovac, Babušnica, Bela Palanka, Pirot, Dimitrovgrad, Kalna, Kriva Feja, Vladičin Han, Vučje, Vlasotince, Grdelica, Bresto- vac and finding its correlation to landslide occurrences. Precipitation for seven decades (period 1946-2017) has been interpolated by IDW method in the software ArcMap 10.5 and correlated to Crna Trava slope map. Potential locations of landslides were deter- mined and compared to the recent landslides which occurred in July in 2018, in Bankov- ci village. Potential years for landslide activation were compared to calculated values of The Precipitation Concentration Index (PCI), The Modified Fournier Index (MFI), and Lang Aridity Index (AILang). The case study was done based on fieldwork which happened in a period from 20 to 26 of July 2018 in the village of Bankovci. On the 25 of July landslides were activated because of the extreme weather conditions, which affected wider region in Central and South-east Serbia: 100 liters of rain fell during the three-hour period.
    [Show full text]
  • IRIS Network Case Studies on Innovative Social Inclusion Practices
    Project is funded by European Union IRIS Network Case studies on innovative social inclusion practices October 2016 Project is funded by European Union IRIS Network Case studies on innovative social inclusion practices October 2016 ABOUT IRIS NETWORK What is IRIS Network? Founded in 2012, IRIS Network is the unique regional network that brings together CSOs social service providers in SEE. The Network is based on vision of equal rights and opportunities for decent living for all. It is created to ensure the social inclusion by enabling the environment for the provision of high quality services trough support to the developmental policies focused. Also, important part of Networks’ mission is to support the national members and decision makers in creation of developmental policies, lobbing and advocacy focused on ensuring access to quality services. Since 2014, IRIS Network has seven national secretariats in SEE. IRIS in numbers national 150+ Case studies on innovative social inclusion practices organizations from 7 networks SEE region are The experiences, best practices and lessons learned through the project “Improving the provision of Social in Bosnia and Herzegovina, connected along with Service Delivery in South Eastern Europe through the empowerment of national and regional CSO Croatia, Serbia, Montenegro, having their capacities networks” are represented within Case studies on innovative social inclusion practice. Kosovo, FYROM and Albania enriched thru provided social services; The social engagement and good cooperation between national IRIS network members in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, FYR Macedonia, Kosovo, Montenegro and Serbia, resulted in development of 6 national innovative case studies. The studies are promoting inventive and sustainable solutions based on a social investment approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Management Plan
    CONTRACT ID: RRSP/CS3-RRD4-1/2017-03 PREPARATION OF MAIN DESIGNS FOR HEAVY MAINTENANCE (ROAD REHABILITATION- UPGRADING) OF THE STATE ROADS IA 1 AND IB 22: LOT 1: IA 1, BRESTOVAC (INTERCHANGE) – DOLJEVAC (INTERCHANGE), L=6.022 KM LOT 2: IB 22, UŠĆE-RAŠKA (KOSOVSKA MITROVICA), L=32.127 KM LOT 3: IB 22, NOVI PAZAR (BRDJANI) - RIBARIĆE, L=24.360 KM ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN: FINAL VERSION: LOT 1: IА1, BRESTOVAC (INTERCHANGE) – DOLJEVAC (INTERCHANGE), KM 457+272 – KM 451+250, L=6.022 KM - December 2020. Environmental and Social Management Plan Document quality information General information Author Мarina Komad, dipl. Civil Engineer Milica Milenković, MSc Spatial Planner CONTRACT ID: RRSP/CS3-RRD4-1/2017-03 Project title PREPARATION OF MAIN DESIGNS FOR HEAVY MAINTENANCE (ROAD REHABILITATION-UPGRADING) OF THE STATE ROADS IA 1 AND IB22 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN: Final version: Document title LOT 1: IA 1, BRESTOVAC (INTERCHANGE) – DOLJEVAC (INTERCHANGE), KM 457+272 – KM 451+250 L=6.022 KM Date December 2020. Addressed on: Sending to Name Organization Date PE „‟Roads of Serbia‟‟ 22.12.2020. Igor Radovic, dipl. ing. (C.E.) PE „‟Roads of Serbia‟‟ 22.12.2020. Jelena Cvetkovic, mast.geogr. Copy to Name Organization Date Gordana Subotički Đorđević, PE „‟Roads of Serbia‟‟ 22.12.2020. dipl.ing. (C.E.) PE „‟Roads of Serbia‟‟ 22.12.2020. Dragan Vuković, dipl.ing. (C.E.) PE „‟Roads of Serbia‟‟ 22.12.2020. Marko Stevanović, dipl.ing. (C.E.) Ţivan Novitović, dipl.ing. (C.E.) Arup d.o.o. Serbia 22.12.2020. Milutin Štrbić, dipl.ing.
    [Show full text]
  • Invest in LESKOVAC 143 7 503 22 13
    Invest in LESKOVAC Located at Pan-European Corridor X in the CITY ID south of Serbia, City of Leskovac holds favorable geo-strategic position for duty free CITY OF LESKOVAC, SERBIA exports to various European markets. Large number of highly qualified workforce and Area 1.025 km²; 37% arable land, 27% forests, 36% roads and other young professionals live and work in the Population 144.206 region, representing exceptional intellectual Number of businesses 958 companies, 3.268 entrepreneurs potential. The region is well known for its Key industries Food, textile, wood, chemical industry great wealth in natural resources: land, water, mineral wealth, forests, and organic City budget (EUR) 29.651.652 EUR; capital investments 11,26% agriculture potential. Major production se- Contact Pana Đukića 9-11, 16 000 Leskovac, Serbia, +381 16 200 804, Berlin ctors in the food industry include fruit, vege- [email protected], [email protected] table and meat processing. Total number of companies and entrepreneurs in the sector is 189. Annual crop yield is 356.246 tons, in Munich addition to vegetable yields and fruit pro- Budapest Vienna duction of 156.892 and 212.401 tons respe- ctively. In order to promote investments and exports in agriculture and fruit-processing Zagreb Belgrade industry, the City of Leskovac has developed Milan new industrial “Green Zone” covering the Sarajevo Leskovac area of 971.500 m² just 4 km from the city Sofia Istanbul center in the vicinity of E75 Highway. Being Skopje certified as business-friendly municipality, Thessaloniki Leskovac provides high quality service and support to investors interested to develop their business in South East Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Uredba O Utvrđivanju Jedinstvene Liste Razvijenosti Regiona I Jedinica Lokalne Samouprave Za 2014
    UREDBA O UTVRĐIVANJU JEDINSTVENE LISTE RAZVIJENOSTI REGIONA I JEDINICA LOKALNE SAMOUPRAVE ZA 2014. GODINU ("Sl. glasnik RS", br. 104/2014) Član 1 Ovom uredbom utvrđuje se jedinstvena lista razvijenosti regiona, koji su prema stepenu razvijenosti razvrstani u razvijene i nedovoljno razvijene regione i jedinica lokalne samouprave, koje su razvrstane u prvu, drugu, treću i četvrtu grupu i devastirana područja na osnovu podataka organa nadležnog za poslove statistike i finansija. Član 2 Razvrstavanje regiona vrši se na osnovu vrednosti bruto-domaćeg proizvoda po glavi stanovnika u regionu u odnosu na republički prosek, za referentni period. Razvijeni regioni su regioni koji ostvaruju vrednost bruto-domaćeg proizvoda iznad vrednosti republičkog proseka, i to: 1) Beogradski region; 2) Region Vojvodine. Nedovoljno razvijeni regioni su regioni u kojima je vrednost bruto-domaćeg proizvoda ispod vrednosti republičkog proseka, i to: 1) Region Šumadije i Zapadne Srbije; 2) Region Južne i Istočne Srbije. Pored regiona iz stava 3. ovog člana, status nedovoljno razvijenog regiona ima Region Kosova i Metohije. Član 3 Prema stepenu razvijenosti jedinica lokalnih samouprava prvu grupu čini 20 jedinica lokalne samouprave čiji je stepen razvijenosti iznad republičkog proseka, i to: 1) Bačka Palanka; 2) Beograd; 3) Beočin; 4) Bor; 5) Valjevo; 6) Vrbas; 7) Vršac; 8) Kanjiža; 9) Kragujevac; 10) Lajkovac; 11) Niš; 12) Novi Sad; 13) Pančevo; 14) Pećinci; 15) Požarevac; 16) Senta; 17) Stara Pazova; 18) Subotica; 19) Užice; 20) Čačak. Prema stepenu razvijenosti
    [Show full text]
  • National Report of the Republic of Serbia to the Habitat Iii Conference
    NATIONAL REPORT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA TO THE HABITAT III CONFERENCE BELGRADE, SEPTEMBER 2016 0 MINISTRY OF CONSTRUCTION, TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE Minister prof. Dr. Zorana Mihajlović Department for housing and architectural policies, public utilities and energy efficiency Deputy Minister Jovanka Atanacković Working team of the Ministry: Svetlana Ristić, B.Sc. Architecture Božana Lukić, B.Sc. Architecture Tijana Zivanovic, MSc. Spatial Planning Siniša Trkulja, PhD Spatial Planning Predrag I. Kovačević, MSc. Demography Nebojša Antešević, MSc. Architecture Assistance provided by the working team of the Professional Service of the Standing Conference of Towns and Municipalities: Klara Danilović Slađana Grujić Dunja Naić Novak Gajić Aleksandar Marinković Rozeta Aleksov Miodrag Gluščević Ljubinka Kaluđerović Maja Stojanović Kerić The report was prepared for the UN Conference on Settlements Habitat III in Serbian and English language 1 CONTENT I Urban Demography ................................................................................................................... 4 1. Managing rapid urbanization ............................................................................................. 4 2. Managing rural-urban linkages .......................................................................................... 6 3. Addressing urban youth needs ........................................................................................... 7 4. Responding to the needs of the aged .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SERBIE G R I E (Plus De 1 100 000 Hab.) O N SZEGED H MAKÓ V
    vers BUDAPEST 20° vers BÉKÉSCSABA vers BUDAPEST vers ORADEA 22° 21° vers BUCAREST Capitale d'État SERBIE G R I E (plus de 1 100 000 hab.) O N SZEGED H MAKÓ v. BUDAPEST 19° NADLAC ARAD Plus de 200 000 hab. E PÉCS B Plus de 100 000 hab. ) SÂNNICOLAU MARE Mures U A N Kanjiza A N 46° D U Subotica Novi R LIPOVA Plus de 50 000 hab. D vers CRAIOVA ( nca Knezevac ra A 46° MOHÁCS BAČKA DU NORD K B A N A T r Coka O Plus de 25 000 hab. i B A Č K A v a a ic j Senta t a a D E L ’ O U E S T l D U N O R D Z Plus de 10 000 hab. Bačka Topola Kikinda U BELI MANASTIR Ada (SEVERNI JIMBOLIA vers VARAZDIN Sombor (SEVERNA BAČKA) Autre ville ou localité I I BANAT) I a DRA I g V I Mali Idos TIMISOARA e M E I B I V I e Crvenka ( li I k Nova D i I VOÏVODINE I Pirot Chef-lieu d'okrug (district) R k I Crnja A I a (province autonome) Apatin n Kula s I LUGOS V a I i j A I l I m ) M e i (Z A P A D N A I Becej Novi Becej l T OSIJEK I I I g a I a I I e n A Autoroute a l I I I B k i CRAIOVA B A Č K A) I I I i I I I I Vrbas I I I r I i T ta k k I S s a I I j vers I e n S g Srbobran B A I N A T a A e Route principale I CRUCENI l B Odzaci I BAČKAI DU SUD C R O A T I E GATAIA I Bîrza v a Zitiste N I s i V I u D Temerin ka Backi A Bac m Route secondaire N I C E N T R A L a DETA ( I D Petrovac U I T U B I I N Zabali Boka E I I Secanj VINKOVCI A I I I V Zrenjanin Autre route VUKOVAR I ) Novi Sad I I (SREDNJI BANAT) I I vers ZAGREB I I I I JAMU (JUŽNI BAČKA) I Backa Palanka Plandiste Futog K I MARE Titel a I Voie ferrée n I B a l I o sut Beocin D I u E I 641 vers CRAIOVA n D a
    [Show full text]
  • ODLUKU O Izboru Pravnih Lica Za Poslove Iz Programa Mera Zdravstvene Zaštite Životinja Za Period 2014–2016
    Na osnovu člana 53. stav 5. Zakona o veterinarstvu („Službeni glasnik RS”, br. 91/05, 30/10, 93/12), Ministar poljoprivrede, šumarstva i vodoprivrede donosi ODLUKU o izboru pravnih lica za poslove iz Programa mera zdravstvene zaštite životinja za period 2014–2016. godine Poslovi iz Programa mera za period 2014–2016. godine, koji su utvrđeni kao poslovi od javnog interesa, ustupaju se sledećim pravnim licima: Grad Beograd 1. VS „Tika Vet” Mladenovac Rabrovac, Jagnjilo, Markovac Amerić, Beljevac, Velika Ivanča, Velika Krsna, Vlaška, Granice, Dubona, Kovačevac, Koraćica, Mala Vrbica, 2. VS „Mladenovac” Mladenovac Međulužje, Mladenovac, selo Mladenovac, Pružatovac, Rajkovac, Senaja, Crkvine, Šepšin Baljevac, Brović, Vukićevica, Grabovac, Draževac, VS „Aćimović– 3. Obrenovac Zabrežje, Jasenak, Konatica, LJubinić, Mislođin, Piroman, Obrenovac” Poljane, Stubline, Trstenica Belo Polje, Brgulice, Veliko Polje, Dren, Zvečka, Krtinska, 4. VS „Dr Kostić” Obrenovac Orašac, Ratari, Rvati, Skela, Ušće, Urovci 5. VS „Simbiosis Vet” Obrenovac Obrenovac, Barič, Mala Moštanica 6. VS „Nutrivet” Grocka Begaljica, Pudarci, Dražanj Umčari, Boleč, Brestovik, Vinča, Grocka, Živkovac, 7. VS „Grocka” Grocka Zaklopača, Kaluđerica, Kamendo, Leštane, Pudraci, Ritopek Baroševac, Prkosava, Rudovci, Strmovo, Mali Crljeni, 8. VS „Arnika Veterina” Lazarevac Kruševica, Trbušnica, Bistrica, Dren Vrbovno, Stepojevac, Leskovac, Sokolovo, Cvetovac, 9. VS „Artmedika Vet” Lazarevac Vreoci, Veliki Crljeni, Junkovac, Arapovac, Sakulja Lazarevac, Šopić, Barzilovica, Brajkovac, Čibutkovica, VS „Alfa Vet CO 10. Lazarevac Dudovica, Lukovica, Medoševac, Mirosaljci, Zeoke, Petka, 2007” Stubica, Šušnjar, Županjac, Burovo 11. VS „Ardis Vet” Sopot Slatina, Dučina, Rogača, Sibnica, Drlupa 12. VS „Uniprim Vet” Barajevo Arnajevo, Rožanci, Beljina, Boždarevac, Manić 13. VS „Vidra-Vet” Surčin Bečmen, Petrovčić, Novi Beograd, Bežanija Surčin Surčin, Dobanovci, Boljevci, Jakovo, Progar 14.
    [Show full text]